You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Dylan Ratigan Discusses The Stockholm Syndrome Relationship Between America And Wall Street

Tyler Durden's picture




The only person who in the past made CNBC even remotely watchable, Dylan Ratigan, is out with a scathing review of the anti-symbiotic relationship between the American people and the Wall Street/DC Lobby/Regulatory complex, in a piece titled "Americans Have Been Taken Hostage."

The American people have been taken hostage to a broken system.

It is a system that remains in place to this day.

A system where bank lobbyists have been spending in record numbers to make sure it stays that way.

A system that corrupts the most basic principles of competition and fair play, principles upon which this country was built.

It is a system that so far has forced
the taxpayer to provide the banks with the use of $14 trillion from the
Federal Reserve, much of the $7 trillion outstanding at the US Treasury
and $2.3 trillion at the FDIC.

A system partially built by the very people who currently advise our
President, run our Treasury Department and are charged with its reform.

And most stunningly -- it is a system that no one in our government has yet made any effort to fundamentally change.

Zero Hedge applauds Dylan's effort to awake more people to the systemic threat that is not only the TBTF complex, but the effectively monopolistic concentration of every financial power imaginable in such glaring examples as Goldman Sachs, whose domination of sales, flow trading, prop trading, market making, liquidity provisioning, underwriting, corporate advisory, "analysis", and selective information release to key clients, all the while backstopped from any potential loss compliments of what has become an implicit balance sheet guarantee footed by the American people, is now nothing less than a monopolistic anti-trust issue.

Continuing with the Ratigan piece:

Last fall was an awakening for me, as it was for many in our country.

And yet, our Congress has yet to open its eyes, much less do
anything about it. In fact conditions have never been better for the
banks or worse for the rest of us.

Why is this? Who does our Government work for? How much longer will
we as Americans tolerate it? And what, if anything, can we do about it?

As we approach the anniversary of the bailouts for our banks and
insurers -- and watch the multi-trillion taxpayer-funded programs at
the Federal Reserve continue to support banks and subsidize their
multibillion bonus pools, we must ask if our politicians represent the
interests of America? Or those who would rob America of its money and
its future?

As a country, we must demand that our politicians stop serving those
whose business models are based on systemic theft and start serving
those who seek to create value for others -- the workers, innovators
and investors who have made this country great.

A new generation of Americans has to emerge from behind the scenes: one that is untainted with the immense legacy conflicts of Wall Street lobby interests: individuals such as Ron Paul, Judge Rakoff, Elizabeth Warren, Alan Grayson, Senator Kaufman and many others, who we all know deep down inside speak the truth, and even if they have their own particular axe to grind, do so (at least for now) with the American public's interest at heart. Yet more have to step up to the plate. We welcome Dylan's piece as a rallying call for all those who share in the pursuit of integrity yet are ambivalent about the success of seeking truth in a world which rewards only cronyism, collusion, greed, speculation, fraud and excess. Those are not the qualities that have made America great, and if left unchecked, guarantee a decline and end in the American way of life, with nothing but a lasting memory of the virtues that drove America's founding fathers to make it the great country it once used to be.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:10 | Link to Comment KeyserSöze
KeyserSöze's picture

Dylan,

    It is the FEDERAL RESERVE Dylan not the politicians. Until you do do something about that my friend your rhetoric gets laughed at not only by those in Washington but our friends over in London that own the Federal Reserve.  Politicians are whore's and if they see the money drying up they will abandon the Fed...till then I admire your calls but you have to come up with a few trillion dollares to out bid the private Central Bank for Congress.  Concentrate on the real issue...

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:26 | Link to Comment I am a Man I am...
I am a Man I am Forty's picture

The congress gave the Fed their powers, it is the congress that must take it away.    

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:53 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

The congress gave the Fed their powers, it is the congress that must take it away.

A correct statement of fact.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:01 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

Unfortunately it's always easier to give something than to take it away. I don't think congress is up to the job quite yet.

When the people put a blowtorch to their feet... then maybe. What channel did that guy say Idol was on?

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist? 

Tue, 09/15/2009 - 18:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Noth

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not that

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not that I

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not that I think

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not that I think Congress

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not that I think Congress would

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not that I think Congress would do

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:15 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Article I Section 8 of the Constitution:  The legistlative branch has the power to "coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"

I ask how is it even constitutional for the Fed to exist?  Not that I think Congress would do anything

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:21 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

SORRY FOR MULTIPLE POSTS - SOMETHING HAPPENED WITH MY KEYBOARD!!

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:39 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

Ha ha ha ha ha... we are tied at 10!

Same thing happened to me last week on Tyler's Rakoff piece. Each iteration had one extra word. Then I used edit to remove the text and put a dot (.) in. I don't feel so stupid now.

Welcome to the club!

Next Chapter In Rakoff - BofA - SEC Love Triangle Gets Interesting; Cuomo's Arrival Adds Another Vertex

Tue, 09/15/2009 - 18:53 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

LOL... Read Andrew Jackson and what he had to say about the SECOND Central Bank of the United States.

 

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/ajveto01.asp

 

 

But beware what might happen if we try to take down the Fed -

Richard Lawrence gave the doctors several reasons for the shooting. He had recently lost his job painting houses and somehow blamed Jackson. He claimed that with the President dead, "money would be more plenty" (a reference to Jackson’s struggle with the Bank of the United States) and that he "could not rise until the President fell." Finally, he informed his interrogators that he was actually a deposed English King—specifically, Richard III, dead since 1485—and that Jackson was merely his clerk. He was deemed insane, institutionalized, and never punished for his assassination attempt.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:29 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

An amazing article - but even more amazing is where it was published in the very left of center HuffPost and more amazing than that - the hundreds of comments almost all in support of what Ratigan is saying - some comments decrying Pres. Obama's selections of Summers and friends - 

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:49 | Link to Comment JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

No one really knows what right and left mean anymore, the masses have been conditioned only for conflict, righties go after lefties and vice versa. Divide and conquer is the elites' game plan and it's working but with almost everyone being conquered financially, I believe that many are waking up and seeing the folly that they have been acting out. It looks like more are coming out of a too-much-comfort induced sleep.

Petty squabbles about political philosophy are a luxury few can afford anymore, they just want this thing fixed before it gets worse, the wolf is at the door.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:51 | Link to Comment curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

69025....get off your ever so pious high horse and realize something.  IT IS NO LONGER A RIGHT vs. LEFT THING anymore.  It is an US vs. THEM thing now.  We are losing. 

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 09/15/2009 - 07:39 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

...Pretty sure that's what he was saying...

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:55 | Link to Comment Philologus TaXitus
Philologus TaXitus's picture

Unfortunately still too many Americans are unaware of the extent that the peasant/elite dichotomy influences their lives and continue to get all riled up from the MSM promoting 'US vs. Them' liberal/conservative shtick.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 09/15/2009 - 08:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:25 | Link to Comment Sardonicus
Sardonicus's picture

It's all we got left as a country and an economy.

You know the game is over when the Chinese are better at capitalism than the rest of the world.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:42 | Link to Comment gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

What has Prince Charles got to do with this?

;)

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:03 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

You missed a step.

Most people are too afraid of losing what little they have left to do anything risky to the system on which they depend entirely.

The missing step is: We have to lose everything.

Only when all is lost will people turn in anger and demand change at the end of a sword.

Until then... dream on.

cougar

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 19:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:44 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

Or pitchfork... on sale at WalMart right now by the way!

Tue, 09/15/2009 - 17:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:26 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Or maybe we are getting what we deserve.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:11 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Nothing changes until the game is up, the winners and losers are sorted, and the winners are found to be vulnerable, and the losers go after them.

Then, things change.

So long as everyone thinks they might be a winner, so long as the music plays and the number of chairs left looks about right, we go around. A big part of the "green shots" myth is about pretending that there are enough chairs for everyone when the music stops. Problem is, these are deck chairs on the Titanic and the entire system is sinking.

There will be no winners.

At worst, there won't even be any change. Just a total collapse of Everything and a gradual restoration of local economic processes operating at a human scale. My eggs for your bacon, on the street corner, and remembering the old days. Well I guess that isn't so bad really. Bring it on.

cougar

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:56 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

You just stole the Titanic analogy I was working on.

In the event of systemic collapse however I think you may be overly optimistic about restoration of economic processes. At least in urban areas. You are discounting the real possibility of social anarchy.

If L.A. was torched over the Rodney King verdict, how do you think the already marginalized are going to respond to this clusterf&ck?

They'll have to imprison a heck of a lot of people ... and the only thing that will evolve from that is a totalitarian police state.

But then again maybe I'm wrong...

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:46 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

If a protest occurred in Washington and the press wasn’t there to cover it ……

 

http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2009/sep/13/if-protest-occurred-washingto...

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 21:03 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

WTF? Looks like the 5 dudes (excluding Murdoch this time) that own the MSM are in collusion here.

A conspiracy of silence speaks louder than words.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:44 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Nobody who might be down enough to stage a sit-in knows who GS is, where they are located, or what role they have played in all this. To their credit, GS and their spokesdrones have done a great job of painting Congress and the Chinese as the culprits.

My guess is GS will skate. Congress will be emptied of incumbants over the next two elections, and nothing will change at all.

Or else, the economy will totally implode and GS will like the rest of us wake up one morning and nothing will be left of it. At which point the struggle will be to secure a supply of food and fuel as winter sets in and nobody will have the kind of spare cycles to stage a protest over something as abstract as corporate regulation.

cougar

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:28 | Link to Comment blackebitda
blackebitda's picture

now i suspect i can guess why he left CNBC. one he knew the ratings did not justify his passion, and second, he could no longer look himself in the mirror because he knew that what he reported and knew where different. he took a stand down a path where he could look himself in the mirror and move closer toward reporting truth. and while he had to stay under wraps as CNBC forced him to due to his non-compete, he was patient and now works toward his goals. i wish you well Dylan and no longer think you are an idiot reporter from CNBC. may your passion help you do great and right things. 

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:44 | Link to Comment gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

+1

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:12 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

He was never an idiot reporter and continued to press on long after anyone cared about Goldman being made whole by AIG. He was also at the end of his contract.  Ratigan was way too noisy as a voice of reason amid the cheerleaders. He stated shortly after he left that he was going to find a broader audience for his message. I wish him well.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:32 | Link to Comment Danz Gambit
Danz Gambit's picture

He still draws a check from GE .. just sayin

Great article though. Now if only we could find a leader. 1000's of various blogs and such, everyone one of them with scores of pissed off commentors; if only there was some way to organize .. we could be a force to be reckoned with. Is there a John Conner out there?

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 22:00 | Link to Comment Bolweevil
Bolweevil's picture

Jonathan E.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 22:48 | Link to Comment TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

I believe he left because at the end of his contract he wanted to do an investigation into Goldman's cheating ways.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:34 | Link to Comment MountainHawk
MountainHawk's picture

3:27 PM Moody's delinquency tracker for commercial mortgage-backed securitiesticks up again, though by a smaller margin. But even Moody's isn't selling the "less bad" angle: "We expect that the monthly change in the delinquency rate will resume an upward trend over the next several months as troubles compound in the commercial real estate sector." (seechart)

-SeekingAlpha

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:38 | Link to Comment Sardonicus
Sardonicus's picture

Empty freighters off Indonesia means a whole bunch of nothing is for sale.

The line of slumbering rail cars near where I live recently went from being a mile long to almost two miles long.  Has been there about a year and they keep piling up.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:38 | Link to Comment mattco
mattco's picture

Singapore not Indonesia.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:39 | Link to Comment Daedal
Daedal's picture

Ratigan is the man. One of the very few people in front of the camera that understands, instead of distorts, reality.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:43 | Link to Comment tjfxh
tjfxh's picture

Among the "many others" are Dennis Kucinich in the House. Kucinich has been pushing this as hard from the left and Ron Paul from the right. Kucinich's economic advisor was Michael Hudson, who has been warning about the macro implications of debt-driven finance and continues to do so. It is the establishments of both parties that have been rented by Wall Street and other powerful interests, while people of both parties who have been calling for accountability and reform have been marginalized.

 

Until there is comprehensive reform that gets the money out of politics, legalized bribery in the form of campaign finance and lobbying will continue to dominate US domestic and foreign policy.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:48 | Link to Comment They steal from...
They steal from us everyday's picture

Dylan is saying in a left of center forum what Tyler and most of us have been saying for a year.  Good stuff!

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:47 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Oh well, it was nice knowing you, Dylan.

I am Chumbawamba.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:49 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

The average person is still hostage to the system because the average person has their 401(k), their personal IRA and their company pension all tied into the stock/real estate/bond market.

The average Joe is so frightened of the possibility that it will all blow up that they're begging the powers that be to restore everything to what is once was.

This is the real power that is being held over the average Joe's head and exactly why the average Joe will do nothing, at least until they have nothing else to loose.

Until then, as long as the average Joe can be held hostage, the looting will continue. Everyone wants reform AFTER they are safely retired or at least not until their investment accounts have returned to the October 2007 highs.

The average ZH reader forgets how it feels to be uninformed and helpless when it comes to investing.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:49 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

+1

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:49 | Link to Comment tradertim
tradertim's picture

u da man dylan. cheers to ya!!

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 15:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

The first person to do so in a serious, definitive way will be jailed and labeled a fruitcake.

I'm not ever remotely joking.

cougar

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:53 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

No, not wierd. It's the difference between being a thoughtful person attuned to the reality on the ground, and being part of a cult of personality.

Thoughtful people can and do change their mind.

cougar

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 19:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:59 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

It very much is free speech, but it decends from the wrong premise.

The original premise was that corporations were granted most or all of the same rights as individuals by the passage of the 14th ammendment. After that decision, our doom was sealed.

Now the entire Constitution is tainted and will have to  be thrown out and redone from basic principles. Among the basics must be the notion that freedom of speech accrues only to sentient beings -- real humans -- and not to synthetic entities like corporations.

We'll get that, after the next civil war. I give it 60 years.

cougar

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:20 | Link to Comment solarsense
solarsense's picture

so the answer is, pass some new regs, so that the feds and big corp become even more powerful? that is how we got into this situation in the first place.

ratigan is selling the State of Fear, i shall not buy. get rid of federalism and there will be more competition from growing companies, simple. you are no rebel if you want to be coddled by bureaucrats

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:22 | Link to Comment Mr. Anonymous
Mr. Anonymous's picture

TD, this is the sort of essential material the FaceBook crowd might be able to understand, along with Taibbi, etc.  Is there a FaceBook link, a la YouTube, I'm not aware of to get this sort of thing more easily out to the HoiPolloi?  MySpace obviously unnecessary.  Or do we wish ZH HQ to remain more 'exclusive'?  Though I'd argue the math Captcha largely solves that. 

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:23 | Link to Comment Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

Click on the green square below the post for bookmark links including facebook.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:29 | Link to Comment Mr. Anonymous
Mr. Anonymous's picture

Sweet.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 17:05 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Most Americans also don't buy into the idea that the planet is being warmed by CO2 emissions (including probably every single reader here, if the averages hold) nor are they aware that more people are killed in auto accidents than by terrorists, gangs, and drug dealers.

It's not because they are stupid. It's because the media is working with the government and corporations to keep people doing the things they need to do to maintain all-important BAU.

Because there is money in it.

A man will not take a stand on a subject in which he has a personal financial investment, other than to improve his personal return.

cougar

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 21:23 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

I could be wrong but...

I'll shave myself bald if the global tropospheric temperature does not fall below the 1979 temps within the next 12 months. It made it there in 2008 already!

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_Aug_091.jpg

Goldman is all for the trillion dollar carbon markets. That should be a clue... but you are correct about the rest Coug.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 16:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 17:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 17:59 | Link to Comment Zippyin Annapolis
Zippyin Annapolis's picture

Thievery pays. All you need is a wad of cash and a willing orifice.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 18:25 | Link to Comment lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

I'm sorry but did I miss a class? When did this mediocrity become Thomas Jefferson?

 

Dylan Ratigan. The new Keith Olberman.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 18:34 | Link to Comment Commander Cody
Commander Cody's picture

Dylan Ratigan - Superman (for truth, justice & the American Way).

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:17 | Link to Comment lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

I can't believe what I'm reading here. Ratigan is a member of the same group of financial "journalists" that sat there and said nothing until finally it was too late. Now that he's moved to another network he's has an epiphany. Okey Dokey.

You won't find truth on television. And if you watch too much your brains turn to mush.

Tue, 09/15/2009 - 17:29 | Link to Comment Commander Cody
Commander Cody's picture

Is brain mush good to eat?

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 18:35 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

This is the endgame of the kleptocracy, where the looting is conducted out in plain sight because speed is of the essence.  There's not much time left.  Corruption is in your face, whatcha gonna do about it, huh?  Plenty of cops to pull you over and steal $300 bucks from you for expired vehicle inspection, but no one to keep Wall Street from stealing $20 Trillion from you.

A new generation of Americans has to emerge from behind the scenes: one that is untainted

I think rather we need a new generation that is undaunted, and unafraid.  Fear is "their" most potent weapon, and they are using it liberally.  Our generation is still trying to cling to our comfortable lifestyles, our stuff, and (y)our trophy women.  When we reach the stage of geniunely pledging our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor, then we will be willing to do what is needed to actually reclaim our liberty, and our future along with it.

Please start thinking about it.

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 18:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 18:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 20:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/14/2009 - 22:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!