This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

ECB To Withdraw €16.5 Billion In Liquidity Injected Last Week Even As Pritchard Says Only QE Can Save Euro

Tyler Durden's picture




 

In yet another attempt to blur the fine line between sterilization and quantitative easing, the ECB has announced it will carry out a one week variable rate liquidity operation on Tuesday to absorb the €16.5 billion in cash that was spent on bond purchases (don't you dare suggest this is QE) until last Friday. This will be followed with another liquidity extraction procedure the following week. From the press release: "As decided by the Governing Council on 10 May, the ECB will conduct specific operations in order to re-absorb the liquidity injected through the Securities Market Programme." The amount of the extraction takes "into account transactions with settlement at or before Friday 14 May." The logic of immediately extracting rescue liquidity for a continent that is still on the verge of a liquidity crisis eludes us. Market News solidifies the point: "The ECB has not disclosed the total volume it intends to spend on the programme but had promised repeatedly before today that it would drain all additional liquidity injected." Zero Hedge contributor Bruce Krasting points out "To me this an AWACs. The ECB is not playing ball. They are doing some lip service on tv but no fx intervention and no QE tells me they want a much lower Euro and an ultimate blow up that lets them kick out a few members and create a two tiered Euro. Deutschland Uber Alas." We do not disagree. And across the Atlantic Evans-Pritchard agrees that only full blown QE can, paradoxically, do anything to restore confidence in the euro.

From the Telegraph:

There is a way out of this crisis, but it is not the policy of wage deflation imposed on Ireland, Greece, Portugal, and Spain, with Italy now also mulling an austerity package. This can only lead to a debt-deflation spiral. The IMF admits that Greece’s public debt will rise to 150pc of GDP even after its squeeze, and that Spain’s budget deficit will still be 7.7pc of GDP in 2015.

The only viable policies – short of breaking up EMU or imposing capital controls – is to offset fiscal cuts with monetary stimulus for as long it takes.
Will it happen, given the conflicting ideologies of Germany and Club Med? Probably not. The ECB denies that it is engaged in Fed-style quantitative easing, vowing to sterilise its bond purchases “euro for euro”. If they mean it, they must doom southern Europe to depression. No democracy will immolate itself on the altar of monetary union for long.

Which means that the EURUSD is likely going not only to parity, but much lower. Unless, of course, Bernanke finally comes up with some mechanism to put the final stake throough the heart of the dollar. Because, as Doug Kass points out, "the eurozone accounts for about 15% of S&P profits. A declining euro could lead to negative foreign-exchange translation and lower imports. The lower euro should shave about 3% to 3.5% off of this year's and about 4% off of next year's S&P profits." 3% off the estimated ~$80 in 2010 EPS is equivalent to 45 points in the S&P at a 15x multiple. Our estimate is that this will be a wildy optimistic estimate as the underlying 80 EPS in the S&P will very likely be a one time pick and once the stimulus, both monetary and fiscal, benefits run out, S&P earnings will plunge by about 40%.

Place your bets.

 

 

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 05/17/2010 - 10:59 | 356277 Henry Chinaski
Henry Chinaski's picture

Like putting toothpaste back in the tube.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:02 | 356281 deadparrot
deadparrot's picture

All these eggheads preach more liquidity and more stimulus when economies are fragile, but none of them suggest the opposite when economies are strong. Even Keynesians are not good Keynesians.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:38 | 356360 aint no fortuna...
aint no fortunate son's picture

So the only one buying the EURO is Bernanke. The logic is glittering.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:04 | 356284 john_connor
john_connor's picture

Rock, meet hard place.  Illusions can be illusory for only so long when the wind is blowing violently in all directions.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:04 | 356285 youngandhealthy
youngandhealthy's picture

Its not that difficult...liquidity can dry up in different places. Now it was Sovereign/Corp Bonds from Club Med. That doesn't mean the Finns need more for their credit cards.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:07 | 356293 pros
pros's picture

The Euro is dead, because the U.S. needs it to be dead.

 

let's go to a more interesting question.

 

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:08 | 356296 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

Can't concentrate now.

Too busy staring at Mandy...

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:12 | 356305 silvertrain
silvertrain's picture

what did she say?

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:37 | 356358 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

You mean she talks? Don't care what she says. 

Its the accent and cleavage that I'm paying attention to.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:59 | 356397 Oracle of Kypseli
Oracle of Kypseli's picture

Is she inflatable?

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:13 | 356307 Double down
Double down's picture

So they too have the ability, no, no,no,no, the gift of doing something horribly wrong and improve on the error? 

Outfuckingstanding Private Gump 

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:20 | 356318 John McCloy
John McCloy's picture

Shake em down for the QE boys. A true bankster never loses a bet

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 12:28 | 356342 bob resurrected
bob resurrected's picture

It seems to me parity could be on balance, good. Europe would become more competitive. Bernanke would have no pressure to raise fed fund rates. China would have no pressure to raise the yuan. Banks would still get free money to buy Treasuries, continuing to shore up their balance sheets getting their cut as middle man. Treasury sales would have no fear of failure. Main St would have longer to take advantage of the low rates, if we ever see private credit creation again. But, that is a big IF as long as public credit creation is running full steam ahead. Yet, the markets do seem eager to find other markets other than sovereign. The multi-nationals have had a relative field day over the last year, maybe now it is Main St’s turn. Yes, companies like Coke would take a hit, but can adjust. Companies like Caterpillar, „only slightly.“

 

„As the dollar strengthens, sales in foreign countries tend to taper off as products get relatively more expensive. Because of that, investors should be worried about a strengthening dollar, but only slightly, since the majority of the impact was taken out of the equation through the use of derivative contracts.“

http://www.thestreet.com/story/10712425/caterpillar-coke-one-currency-tw...

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/%22we-are-lending%22-huntington-ban...,^bkx,xlf,skf,^ixic,faz,KEY&sec=topStories&pos=9&asset=&ccode=

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 12:51 | 356515 plongka10
plongka10's picture

Managing European Distribution for a US company, I can tell you that parity would be a disaster.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:04 | 356540 pros
pros's picture

to plongka10:my comment yesterday:

In this round of the game:

1. Remaining U.S. manufacturers of tradables are decimated (no..not the defense contractors, Pharma, energy producers or agribusness) as Euro exports boom, and U.S. cannot compete..even Chinese goods will be more expensive in Europe

2. U.S. bankers get much richer and the NY base consolidates control of the increasingly dollar-based GFS.

 

The rounds of the game are getting geometrically shorter in duration of time...and also more exciting in many respects:

 

The next BIG QUESTION?????-

Probably--

How can the U.S. appropriate the wealth of Emerging Market countries (without a "hot war") to reduce its debt and support a standard of living for its plebes/prols sufficient to maintain control of U.S. domestic regime by the reigning elite?   I never have bought the argument that the U.S. can declare China to be terrorists and nuke them, but I admit that since we are rapidly building bases next door in Afghanistan the chore is becoming easier.

 

It seems like every day the U.S. governing elite proves that not only are they greediest and most corrupt, they are also the most effective and efficient.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 15:38 | 356656 bob resurrected
bob resurrected's picture

Do you currently not have derivatives in place or are you priced out going forward? Tomorrow or within a couple of months, could you borrow 10 years of your gross profit in Euros? Curious and thank you.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:34 | 356343 THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

I appreciate the breathless quotes from Evans-Pritchard as much as anyone - he is a excellent writer.

But he does work for the Telegraph - his reporting may be coloured by certain London interests..

My understanding of this crisis is that its origins Lie in the monetarist megalomania of Milton and others - the Anglo saxon world has pursued this ideology with zeal and its policies have also infected continental Western Europe.

Britain has always fought a good fight with very little resources but once upon a time it had some muscle - now it has nothing but the power of the pen.

The Holy Roman empire empire has never really disappeared and in its present manifestation will resist even more the siren call of the illusionists in London and New York.

Britain is now a Hollow shell with no capacity to produce anything but houses - its industrial traditions have been abandoned for the more amorous charms of pirate prostitutes who fuck everyone for a price.

London might win this battle again but it will be a pyrrhic victory as there is no more worlds to conquer.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:34 | 356349 JacksCompleteLa...
JacksCompleteLackOfSuprise's picture

So when does China sell some USD to raise EURUSD and protect the competitiveness of its USD pegged Yuan?

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:41 | 356366 youngandhealthy
youngandhealthy's picture

@Jack....thats a good question...The trade between the US/China and EU/china is about the same size (China export)...but China import is little bit bigger from EU. It will come...I am sure

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:26 | 356579 topshelfstuff
topshelfstuff's picture

I think you just descibed about as good a Barometer to watch for than any other I've heard. A good idea to look at the Import/Export Flow between China & EU versus China & US. I would also add a positive bent to the EU simply because the current Balance is not as wide as that of the US, and when the EU Buys they don't add to the Deficit to the degree the US does.

There is one other Point I believe we should all remember, You should all recall how during the past 8 years or so, circa 2001 and Forward, much of the seen Strength in the EURO was more a reflection of the Weakness in the USD --- not really a Fundamental play on the EURO.

The EURO was seen as the DEFAULT Currency, the only other Paper Currency with the necessary Liquidity to consider as a replacement for the USD as the Reserve Currency of the World, the next in line [I'm sure you all remember that and probably used this term yourself, or remember how often it was used]. Like OIL, for example; anytime a "diferent" currency was considered, or used, as the Payment currency for OIL it was the EURO. Next will be the IMF's SDR's and how the formula will be altered. I believe its this year, 2010, when the current weighting conmes up for an adjustment....the USD, GBP<< UK, EURO, and YEN, are all heavily Paperized. A funny thing I was thinking about...I'll explain. I was trying to think of what would be the Safest way to hold Cash Totals. Well, though this would be very hard to do, and the "funny" part, I thought that putting All your Cash in US Pennies and Nickels would be one way to preserve Purchasing Power. But not very Feasible is it. How the heck can someone do that w/o needing the storage needed, not to mention just how you would go about using this "Money"...but, think about it, these Pennies & Nickels do contain the Copper, Zinc and Nickel that may just turn out to be the best protection versus FRN's, feasibilty set aside.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:59 | 356653 youngandhealthy
youngandhealthy's picture

Just wait until the Rmb is set free....there you have it

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:35 | 356352 doggis
doggis's picture

liquidity? huh? - i thought this was solvency? how do you get solvency - AUSTERITY!! how do you provide for long run future growth, rather than a short run monetary printing orgasim - is through being solvent.  they are willing to implement true austerity for the long run growth, yes?

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:19 | 356560 downrodeo
downrodeo's picture

True, but the concept of perpetual growth may be a fatal flaw itself. I think that until we become a type I civilization, we have to realize that we cannot grow indefinitely, forever, and without restraint (or consequences). It is my belief that at least some of the problems we are facing today lie in fact that, due to the structure of the system, we are only prospering when we are growing. We can prosper and thrive in a state of mere balance without constant growth (that is, we have the potential to do so), we just need to think of ways we can do that. We need to eliminate the waste and drag on the system. We need a new paradigm that accounts for the fact that we are living on a finite planet with finite resources that contain within them natural limits to the capacity of each individual system and the system as a whole.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:33 | 356595 pros
pros's picture

DownRodeo:

US grows as the leech, the tick grow..or the vampire squid--sucking life from others

 

this country was founded on the basis of/has thrived by appropriating the property of "others" by whatever means necessary...

no different form other major empires in history.

 

now we use the financial mechanism

 

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:42 | 356615 downrodeo
downrodeo's picture

quite right! I absolutely agree.

 

Is it possible for us to evolve beyond governments and systems?

 

It is my view that it's not only possible, it is imperitive...

Evolution is our only escape pod this time, IMHO.

 

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 14:41 | 356711 ThreeTrees
ThreeTrees's picture

Free Markets and sound money, there's your balance.  Let the price mechanism do its thing to make increasingly scarce resources increasingly expensive, curbing their consumption.

Pare government down to the maintenance of law and order and the need for exponential growth in the monetary base and perpetual growth in the economy vanishes.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 11:52 | 356388 Ropingdown
Ropingdown's picture

The so-called sterilizing deposits can immediately be turned around as ECB loan collateral.  No sterilizing here, really.  Smoke and mirrors.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 12:35 | 356488 pros
pros's picture

Look at commodities....

forget gold...

 

deflationary impact of IMF's Euro package is crushing prices across the board

 

 

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 12:37 | 356492 Miyagi_san
Miyagi_san's picture

fractional liquidity

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 12:56 | 356524 Husk-Erzulie
Husk-Erzulie's picture

If anyone would care to explain how this liquidity extraction is meant to work I would appreciate it.  Seriously, simple explanation anyone?

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:07 | 356541 M.B. Drapier
M.B. Drapier's picture

The ECB is not playing ball. They are doing some lip service on tv but no fx intervention and no QE tells me they want a much lower Euro and an ultimate blow up that lets them kick out a few members and create a two tiered Euro.

I don't get it. Why buy PIIGS debt - at a cost to the Eurosystem's own soundness, a cost which is increased by sterilising the purchases - if the intention is to push the PIIGS to default? And that €16.5bn is nowhere near being the beginning, or the end, of the ECB's largesse to the PIIGS. For that matter, isn't a weaker Euro likely to benefit the PIIGS? And what about those commercial banks in the Eurozone core which can't withstand a PIIGS-initiated wave of defaults? The FT quotes someone as saying

…perhaps having the ECB buy up this debt will make an orderly debt restructuring easier sometime down the road. The ECB is certainly in a better position to take a haircut than the European banks.

but even this time last year it seems that the Eurosystem was in a … poor position to take a PIIGS haircut without a fat cheque from the Eurogroup - or some gonzo monetarisation. Deutschland how are yeh!

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:20 | 356562 pros
pros's picture

To:

Drapier:

This is all a smokescreen for the competitve devaluation to boost Euro economy..

"beggar thy neighbor" deflation...like a slightly new twist on the '30's tariffs

 

US industry will be killed..but anybody manufacturing in the US is a fool and we have no sympathy for fools.

 

dollar will reign supreme for foreseeable future.

 

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:39 | 356603 youngandhealthy
youngandhealthy's picture

@pros:...or the Europeans (maybe together with the Chinese) are calling Bernankes bluff?

Take your attitude at your own peril...its your money

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:40 | 356608 M.B. Drapier
M.B. Drapier's picture

I can certainly buy the idea that the ECB wants (or maybe is resigned to) a lower Euro. What I can't see is how it's scheming to bring about the departure of Greece or other peripheral Euro members.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 13:47 | 356629 youngandhealthy
youngandhealthy's picture

@Drapier.....Because they don't

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 14:51 | 356735 pros
pros's picture

at a 90 cent Euro Greece will be loaded with tourists and exports will fly out the doors of all Euro countries-a boom economy scenario

happens every time a pegged currency devalues.

Mon, 05/17/2010 - 19:46 | 357295 DavidC
DavidC's picture

Yeah right, so Ambrose is on the button when there are STILL people arguing over whether we are in an inflationary or deflationary environment.

DavidC

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!