You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Edolphus Towns Is Latest Shark In Ken Lewis Chum-Filled Pool

Tyler Durden's picture




There is blood in the water... that of Ken Lewis, and the sharks are all over it. The latest to join the dismemberment party of one Bank Of America Chief Executive Officer, is New York Representative, and Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Edolphus Towns. And while the traditional defense provided by Lewis, BofA, and respective lawyers, has been one which delegates any wrongdoing to the attorney-client privilege gray area, Towns has told the bank it "cannot use attorney-client privilege when dealing with Congress." The last piece of armor that Lewis had has just been torn off. From a strategic point of view, the question now becomes whether Ken Lewis, soon to be faced with the traditional prisoner's dilemma, will out his "dealer" Hank Paulson, in exchange for a slap on the wrist, as the alternative could be a much more gruesome fate easily involving an 8x10 cell.

From the New York Times:

In a sternly worded letter on Friday, Mr. Towns, a New York Democrat, said the bank must divulge when it became aware of the enormous losses at Merrill last year, when it received a commitment from the federal government for a second round of bailout money and what legal advice its management received about whether it had to disclose those developments to the bank’s shareholders.

Mr. Towns gave the bank until noon on Monday to provide answers and relevant legal documents. He said it seemed that the bank was “hiding information.” The bank replied to Mr. Towns’s committee late on Saturday, asking him to delay that request until after Tuesday, when Mr. Towns meets with Anne Finucane, the bank’s chief strategy and marketing officer, who oversees public policy at the bank. But a spokesman for Mr. Towns said on Sunday that he was sticking to the deadline.

At this point Lewis is done. Whether it is the judicial track spearheaded by Rakoff, the criminal one where Andrew Cuomo shows no signs of relenting, or the Congressional, now that Towns has joined the fray, the CEO is over. The question is will he go down quietly, and be the sacrificial lamb for a confluence of many different interests, or will his fall be one of flames not only for the former Treasury Secretary but also for the current Chairman of the Fed, both of whom have been indirectly implicated in a massive conspiracy to defraud BofA shareholders in exchange for the "greater good" (and Ken Lewis' job). Maybe the BAC CEO has had enough and is about to squeal. If so, this has been the best coordinated attack against the old guard ever witnessed, which by focusing on the weakest link could easily reach to the very top of the Wall Street oligarchy. David Skeel, a Penn law professor, is dead right in his description of the situation that a witless Lewis has been thrown in, courtesy of Hank Paulson:

"What makes it complicated is it’s not just two parties, it’s not just three parties, it’s six or seven parties. It’s like a multiplayer chess game where each party is making different moves from a different strategic position and each party has a huge amount at stake."

Furthermore, the lines of inquiry have expanded. At some point even Lewis will forget just what it is he is purposefully "not recalling" at any given occasion:

There is also a maze of issues underlying the investigations. While the S.E.C. case focused only on the bonuses paid out at Merrill before the merger, Mr. Towns and Mr. Cuomo are looking at surprise losses at Merrill as well as Bank of America’s suggestion that it considered backing out of the deal last year as a result of the losses. Mr. Towns instructed the bank to tell its current and former employees that they should not assert attorney-client privilege when they are interviewed by his committee.

As to whether Towns really has jurisdiction to revoke the Attorney-Client shield behind which all guilty parties in this affair are now hiding:

While Bank of America acknowledged that Congress had the authority to disregard attorney-client privilege, the bank’s Washington law firm, WilmerHale, argued that that would set a bad precedent and referred Mr. Towns’s staff to the Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act, which passed in the House but never became law.

Would a massive alleged shareholder fraud orchestrated by the bank's executive committee and possibly its board of directors not have a worse precedent? We leave that one to the much less conflicted law firms than WilmerHale, someone like Wachtell Lipton for example.

(Zero Hedge is trying to obtain the actual letter sent by Rep. Towns. If any readers have encountered it, please bring it to our attention).




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 09/20/2009 - 23:30 | Link to Comment JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

Just put John Thain in The CEO seat already, GS needs to run Citibank.

Sun, 09/20/2009 - 23:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/20/2009 - 23:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/20/2009 - 23:46 | Link to Comment JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

Lewis already sunk his ship with his "I didn't perceive it as a threat" testimony, poor guy probably thought he was taking one for the team not knowing he wasn't on the team. Hanky Panky and Kamikaze Ben are probably having a few chuckles.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 01:38 | Link to Comment Joe Sixpack
Joe Sixpack's picture
Proclamation on the Federal Reserve System of the United States of America


 

www.RevokeTheFed.com



March 2008

WHEREAS, Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States of America authorizes Congress "To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures";

WHEREAS, on December 13th, 1913 the US Congress enacted the Federal Reserve System;

WHEREAS, the Federal Reserve System is considered an independent agency within the federal government, with oversight of Congress and containing appointed public officials on its board of directors;

WHEREAS, the Federal Reserve System Controls the Federal Reserve Note, the official currency of the great nation of the United States of America;

WHEREAS, there may be controversies regarding the legality and constitutionality of the Federal Reserve System, it is recognized that the said system has operated continuously as the central banking system of the United States since the inception of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913;

WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States of America granted Congress the authority to create the current Federal Reserve System, it also does grant Congress the authority to modify or revoke the Federal Reserve System;

WHEREAS, the actions of the Fedreral Reserve System represent the credit and currency of the United Stated of America to the citizens of this great nation and to the world;

WHEREAS, the Federal Reserve System, acting independently within the federal government allowed, supported, and even promoted parasitical and non-productive uses of the money and credit of the United States of America;

WHEREAS, the United States and likely the entire world's financial system is undergoing massive de-leveraging of the said parasitical and non-productive uses of the credit and money of the United States of America (as well as other nations' currencies);

WHEREAS, the US dollar, the "Federal Reserve Note" is declining in value due to these parasitical activites, as well as potentially other causes;

WHEREAS, it is recognized that the citizens of the United States and other nations did willingly participate at some level in the creation and propogation of said parasitical activities;

WHEREAS, it is also recognized that the United States of America, a sovereign nation, has the legal, moral, and God given authority to take actions to benefit its citizens and to protect its good name, credit and money in times of difficulty;

WHEREAS, it is recognized that the current time is such a time of great difficulty;

WHEREAS, it is recognized the parasitical financial institutions and their activities are at odds with citizens of the United States of America and the good credit and money thereof;

WHEREAS, the current indications are that the Federal Reserve System is acting to preserve the financial system currently flooded with the parasitical activities;

WHEREAS, the current indications are that the neither the Federal Reserve System, nor the Congress of the United States, nor the people of the United States have access to the books of the institutions being preserved by the Federal Reserve, and therefor the degree of inter-connectivity and risk associated with the institutions and other entities cannot be determined;

WHEREAS, the Federal Reserve System is accepting non-performing assets as collateral for credit with ultimate taxpayer responibility to entities not under its legislative mandate;

IT MUST BE CONCLUDED, that the Federal Reserve System is not acting to the benefit of the people of the United States of America, its credit, money, and good name;

WHEREAS, it is recognized that the political will and capability of the government of the United States of America may not be up to the task of prosecuting this proclamation ; It is also recognized that this may be the only hope for the continued survival of the United States of America as the great nation as it has historically existed.

NOW THEREFORE, it is PROCLAIMED by those supporting this Proclamation that the Congress of the United States of America FULLY NATIONALIZE the Federal Reserve System, and take full control of the credit and money of our great nation; The Congress must take whatever action necessary to seperate out, sequester, disown, or otherwise neutralize the effect of the parasitical financial activities which led to the current crisis; The Congress of the United States of America must reorganize, replace, or terminate the Federal Reserve System as appropriate; or otherwise devise a system for creation of the national currency.

IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED, that the Congress of the United States of America in cooperation with the Executive of the United States of America contact allied nations and any other nation willing to participate in the overhaul of the failing and parastical financial sytem currently in operation and create new treaties and alliances as necessary to create a sane and productive system of finance with the express goal of supporting a productive national, and by extension and through voluntary cooperation, world economy;

FURTHERMORE, it is PROCLAIMED that it should be the goal of such an international effort to maintain fair international trading practices allowing for protection in national interest of labor, resources, and productive capabilities;

WHEREAS, it is recognized that such a move on the part of the United States of America may result in the necessity of an isolationist policy IF the other developed nations do not follow our lead; If such occurs, so be it.

SO HELP US GOD!

Sun, 09/20/2009 - 23:44 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

So BAC is paying a WilmerHale partner $900 per hour to give legal advice based on a PROPOSED law that the legislative branch never voted in to law?

If that's the best he come come up with, I would expect Kenny boy to plead the fif.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 09:35 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Pointing to a proposed law that was passed by the house is political code for saying we have some political support, just look at who voted for the bill in the house.

However, does the term "grasping at straws" ring a bell?

Sun, 09/20/2009 - 23:51 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

While this poor guy apologizes for robbing a Bank of America branch to pay his mortgage and buy medicine for his 73 year old wife, the Bankstas pay themselves multi-million $ bonuses, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/09/elderly-bank-robber-in-san-diego-says-mortgage-drove-him-to-crime.html

 

 

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:01 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

what a great way to go to bed.  there is hope. 

let's get the truth out.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:52 | Link to Comment Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

I couldn't agree more...Start with the moron and let his fear of Bubba open up Pandora's Box. 

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:07 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

Roland Arnall got to be ambassador to the Netherlands. Angelo Mozilo is still floating around on his yacht. Hank Paulson still has his tax free $700M and GW Bush still has his 90k acres in paraguay. Ben Bernanke is still hiding the salami, the Oman is still frying the skin off of children. Yeah, Ken Lewis is the culprit, I wonder which CONgreffcritter lost money in BAC stock? :rolls eyes:

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:12 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

It's all a jigsaw. Every piece counts.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:21 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

To say this is a multi-layered chess game with different & competing players and interests is the understatement of the week.  Wheels within wheels.

Too Many Secrets are now at potential of creating a cascading effect of disintegrating window dressing.

Thanks TD.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:52 | Link to Comment bonddude
bonddude's picture

Well, it looks like Cuomo's price has been met. Obama wants one of only 2 blach governors to step 

down so Cuomo may ascend. It was an even bet whether or not he was serious about pursuing 

his targets. It seems we have our answer on which way he's breaking. It will take a large rug to

sweep the B of A stuff under. And what of the judge?

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:31 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

BofA and the attendent swirls are simply symptoms or indicators of the larger issues at hand.  You are quite correct that we have arrived at the point where either there is not a rug big enough or there is insufficient space created by the rug.  Regardless, the quantum universe is exerting itself in the actions of the judge and others.  Just as a two year olds temper tantrum in a supermarket check out runs out of steam when its attention is diverted by new events, so will the corrupted powers that be attention be diverted by newer and more attention grabbing events as they unfold. However, the preceding events will be left hanging and unresolved as the condition of overwhelmed panic is more fully achieved.

Facts of life.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 01:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 01:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 08:37 | Link to Comment DaddyWarbucks
DaddyWarbucks's picture

Since the topic is banks don't forget Louis T. McFadden. My bet is that KL takes the hit and gets comped by a family promotion into the club. The payoff will be delivered to his progeny long after the dust has settled.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 15:51 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

The progeny may get a title, but never will they really belong.  After all, real membership is defined by actions taken once membership is attained and as far as title holders are concerned, holding title is the be all and end all.

Facts of life

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:44 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

The simple fact of the matter is that there is an ever increased portion of those encompassed by events that are aware.  The situations that are developing can no longer be so easily controlled.  Although the news media is simply one more survivor series in practice, it has also been compromised in the minds of the aforementioned target audience of the aware.  a target audience that is growing by the very minute.

The "fat cats" appreciate this fact quite well, but are left with only the old tools in their tool bags to deal with these new developments.  After all, it would be difficult for them to kill everyone since to do so would eliminate their source of power.  The basis of the current structure rested upon the willful compliance of those encompassed by the system in return for sustainable increases in living standards and security of the person & society.  This quid pro quo has been destroyed by the actions of the so called fat cats themselves.  Advantage, opposition of the current structure of compromised systems and structures.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 00:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 01:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 01:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 01:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 02:08 | Link to Comment laughing_swordfish
laughing_swordfish's picture

Kenny:

Take da fifth before Congress or develop a faulty memory.

Start measuring yourself for a 42L orange jumpsuit, and get ready to spend a lot of quality time with some guys named Bubba and Jojo.

Don't worry - Bermonkey and HankPo will shortly be joining you.

 

 

 

 

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 03:31 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Now THAT was hilarious!

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 02:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 04:13 | Link to Comment Eduardo
Eduardo's picture

Someone is selling, selling, selling in Italy

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 06:19 | Link to Comment jwalker46
jwalker46's picture

Tyler, Your conclusion that "the CEO is done" is a bit over-wrought. Anyone can be compelled to appear before Congress...and anyone can invoke the 5th Amendment, and refuse to testify. Since the 5th applies prospectively and to "any criminal case" (including state cases), Congress can't grant immunity to circumvent that right, either.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 06:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 06:41 | Link to Comment Brick
Brick's picture

Reggie Middleton has a few more details and copies of teh letters I think.

http://boombustblog.com/Reggie-Middleton/1146-Those-Giuys-from-Brooklyn-...

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 07:04 | Link to Comment chinaguy
chinaguy's picture

Excuse me, but does anyone here really think this will lead to meaningful disclosure? These guys call the tune. If they sacrifice Lewis it will only be for a much larger win. 

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 07:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 07:11 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

JWalker: invoking the Fifth is but the first step in a rapidly closing net. If Lewis invokes the 5th, we are looking at an immunity deal in exchange for testimony on the other participants in the securities fraud conspiracy. Again: the prosecution's theory is very simple, and the easy part is the crime: there was an intentional and deliberate intent to defraud by the omission of both of both the Merrill bonuses and the massive losses in the BofA proxy solicitation.  If the losses and bonuses had been disclosed, the shareholders would not have approved the deal. Now that we have the crime, who committed it? Those who signed the registration statement, and those who had knowledge of it, aided it, encouraged it, demanded it, threatened if it did not appear, etc. etc. and employed any insturmentality of interstate commerce (wire, telphone, email etc.) to accomplish it. Remember that phone call bertween Paulson and Ken?

Standard of proof to prove the crimes is high, and Ken's testimony, which suffers from the infirmity of being contrary to his prior, sworn testimony, is absolutely necessary.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 07:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 07:47 | Link to Comment jwalker46
jwalker46's picture

NedZeppelin: Two comments:

(1) Please distinguish between federal and state charges, since the 5th applies to /both/, and please note that the topic is a Congressional inquiry.

Thus, Lewis can take the 5th on the grounds that his testimony would be self-incrimination on the federal or state level.

Net: congressman Towns can go jump off a bridge, he has no leverage over Lewis. (Fastow from Enron is an example; Congress could not compel his testimony.)

However, if you believe a blanket (fed+state) immunity could be granted by /Congress/, then /please/ cite statute, reg or case law. (That is /not/ an argument or challenge; I'd like to learn!)

(2) Back to Tyler's post being over-wrought: if Lewis does receive a blanket immunity (fed+state), then perhaps he is not "done" as Tyler wrote, but "free as a bird"?

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 10:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 07:32 | Link to Comment Eduardo
Eduardo's picture

Rosie is going to be in Bloomberg in minutes.

PS.: the request of some zerohedge commenter was satisfied and deidre is wearing glasses today. She even has a little less of a robotic look today.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 08:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 08:25 | Link to Comment River Tam
River Tam's picture

Towns just needs to look good for his next election. Populist politics. As long as he looks good he doesnt need results.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 08:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 08:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 08:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 10:51 | Link to Comment AR
AR's picture

It is easy to jump on the populist bandwagon and pummel Ken Lewis.  Pause first. The public knows few of the facts of this deal, and the "extreme pressure" that was placed on the bank and board to consummate this deal (on December 5th). Look for the hand behind the curtain pulling the puppet's strings (namely: Paulsen and Bernanke). The only question that remains in our mind is, will Lewis really be forced to "out" Bernanke and Paulsen -- both of who were directly and intimately involved in dictating the terms of this deal (including disclosures). ZH has discussed at great length the government's direct hand, and manipulation, in our markets today. Does anyone realistically believe the U.S. Government stood passively by last November on the BAC/Merrill deal.  Answer: NO.  There is a lot more to this story...

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 11:36 | Link to Comment JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

John Thain is out doing reputation repair, calling KL a liar. So, I guess we know what card is going to be played by hanky panky and bendover benny.

“When I got fired in January and they said ‘John Thain secretly accelerated these bonuses,’ they were lying,” Thain said. “And that has now trapped them into a lot of trouble, because there is a document that says yes, in fact, they agreed to this in September.” Thain declined to answer when an audience member asked his opinion of Lewis. A Bank of America spokesman, Scott Silvestri, didn’t have an immediate comment on Thain’s remarks.

Thain angling for something??

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 12:23 | Link to Comment DrPsycho
DrPsycho's picture

 

     What's not to like ?  The thieves turning on each other......the only way to get           to   them  !!

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 13:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 15:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 15:54 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 19:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!