• Leo Kolivakis
    07/30/2010 - 17:29
    In the first quarter, the US economy grew by 3.7%, revised up from an originally reported 2.7% increase. But growth estimates all the way back to the start of 2007 were revised lower. Moreover, the level of real GDP in Q1 was revised down by $100 billion. Does this mean the secular bull market in bonds will continue? And are Treasuries the "last diversifier left"?
  • Vitaliy Katsenelson
    07/30/2010 - 13:51
    The Japanese economy operates on the assumption, soon to be proved false, that the government will always be able to borrow at low interest rates. As internal demand evaporates, the government will have to start hawking its debt outside Japan — in a more realistic world, where interest rates are a lot higher.
  • Phoenix Capital Research
    07/30/2010 - 09:55
    Dear Mr. President, You don’t know me, but I was one of the millions of Americans who voted for you in the last election. I have since been fairly critical of your Presidency largely because I, like many others, feel betrayed by the policies you have enacted upon winning said election.

Extension Of TARP Now Official: TARP Maturity To Suspiciously Coincide With Mid-Term Elections

Tyler Durden's picture




Treasury Department Releases Text of Letter from Secretary Geithner
to Hill Leadership on Administration’s Exit Strategy for TARP

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of the Treasury released the text of identical letters sent today from Secretary Tim Geithner to Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid outlining the Administration's exit strategy for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) established by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA). The text of the letter to Speaker Pelosi follows.

December 9, 2009

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker          
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Madam Speaker:

I am writing to update you on the status of the Obama Administration's financial policies, including programs initiated under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) established by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), the results they have achieved, the challenges ahead, and our plan for exiting TARP.

These policies are working.  When the Obama Administration took office, the financial system was extremely fragile and the economy was contracting sharply.  The Administration's financial and economic policies have helped to shore up confidence in our financial system.  Credit is starting to flow again to consumers and businesses, and the economy is growing.  Further, private capital is replacing public capital in our major institutions.

As a result of improved financial conditions and careful stewardship of the program, losses on TARP investments are likely to be significantly lower than previously expected.  We now expect a positive return from the government's investments in banks.  These banks will soon have repaid nearly half of the TARP funds they received.  We also expect to recover all but $42 billion of the $364 billion in TARP funds disbursed in FY2009.  Further, we plan to use significantly less than the full $700 billion in EESA authority.  As a result, we expect that TARP will cost taxpayers at least $200 billion less than was projected in the August Mid-Session Review of the President's Budget.

But significant challenges remain.  Too many American families, homeowners, and small businesses still face severe financial pressure.  Although the economy is recovering, foreclosures are increasing, and unemployment is unacceptably high.  Businesses are still cautious in the face of uncertainty about the strength of the recovery, and many small businesses face very difficult credit conditions.  Although bank lending standards are starting to ease, many categories of bank lending continue to contract.  This contraction has hit small businesses very hard because they rely heavily on such lending, and do not have the ability to substitute credit from securities issuance.  Commercial real estate losses also weigh heavily on many small banks, impairing their ability to extend new loans.

Further, the recovery of our financial system remains incomplete.  And near-term shocks to that system could undermine the economic recovery we have seen to date.

Exit Strategy for TARP

Our exit strategy for TARP balances the mandate of EESA to address these challenges with the need to exercise fiscal discipline and reduce the burden on current and future taxpayers.  There are four broad elements to our strategy.

First, we will continue terminating and winding down many of the government programs put in place last fall.  In September, Treasury ended its Money Market Fund Guarantee Program, which guaranteed at its peak over $3 trillion of assets.  The program incurred no losses, and generated $1.2 billion in fees.  The Capital Purchase Program, through which the majority of TARP investments in banks have been made, is effectively closed.  Before this Administration took office, nearly $240 billion in TARP funds had been committed to banks.  Since January 20, we have committed about $7 billion to banks, much of which went to small institutions.  Major U.S. banks subject to the "stress test" conducted last spring have raised over $110 billion in high-quality capital from the private sector.  And banks will soon have repaid $116 billion of TARP funds

Second, we will limit new commitments in 2010 to three areas.

  • We will continue to mitigate foreclosure for responsible American homeowners as we take the steps necessary to stabilize our housing market.
  • We recently launched initiatives to provide capital to small and community banks, which are important sources of credit for small businesses.  We are also reserving funds for additional efforts to facilitate small business lending.
  • Finally, we may increase our commitment to the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which is improving securitization markets that facilitate consumer and small business loans, as well as commercial mortgage loans.  We expect that increasing our commitment to TALF would not result in additional cost to taxpayers.

Beyond these limited new commitments, we will not use remaining EESA funds unless necessary to respond to an immediate and substantial threat to the economy stemming from financial instability.  As a nation we must maintain capacity to respond to such a threat.  Banks are still experiencing significant new credit losses, and the pace of bank failures, which tend to lag economic cycles, remains elevated.  At the same time, many of the Federal Reserve and FDIC programs that have complemented TARP investments are ending.  This creates a financial environment in which new shocks could have an outsized effect – especially if an adequate financial stability reserve is not maintained.  As we wind down many of the government programs launched initially to address the crisis, it is imperative that we maintain this capacity to respond if financial conditions worsen and threaten our economy.  However, before using EESA funds to respond to new financial threats, I would consult with the President and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board and submit written notification to the Congress.  This capacity will bolster confidence and improve financial stability, thereby decreasing the probability that it will need to be used.  This is the third element of our exit strategy.

In order to accomplish these goals, pursuant to Section 120(b) of EESA, I certify that I am hereby extending the authority provided under the Act to October 3, 2010.  This extension is necessary to assist American families and stabilize financial markets because it will, among other things, enable us to continue to implement programs that address housing markets and the needs of small businesses, and to maintain the capacity to respond to unforeseen threats, as described above.

While we are extending the $700 billion program, we do not expect to deploy more than $550 billion.  We also expect up to $175 billion in repayments by the end of next year, and substantial additional repayments thereafter.  The combination of the reduced scale of TARP commitments and substantial repayments should allow us to commit significant resources to pay down the federal debt over time and slow its growth rate.

Even with this extension, we expect that TARP will cost taxpayers at least $200 billion less than was projected in the August Mid-Session Review of the President's Budget, including $25 billion in potential costs from new TARP commitments in 2010.  We expect that the vast majority of these potential costs would come from mitigating foreclosure for responsible American homeowners as we take the steps necessary to stabilize our housing market.

The final element to our exit strategy is how we manage equity investments acquired through EESA while protecting taxpayers.  We will continue to manage those investments in a commercial manner and seek to dispose of them as soon as practicable.  We will exercise our voting rights only on core issues such as election of directors, and we will not interfere in the day-to-day management of individual companies.  In addition, as the steward of taxpayers' funds, Treasury will continue to manage investments in a manner that ensures accountability, transparency and oversight.  And we will work with recipients of EESA funds and their supervisors to accelerate repayment where appropriate.  We want to see the capital base of our financial system return to private hands as quickly as possible, while preserving financial stability and promoting economic recovery.

History suggests that exiting prematurely from policies designed to contain a financial crisis can significantly prolong an economic downturn.  We must not waver in our resolve to ensure the stability of the financial system and to support the nascent recovery that the Administration and the Congress have worked so hard to achieve.  Improvements in the financial performance of EESA programs put us in a better position to address the economic and financial challenges many Americans still face.  I look forward to continuing to work with you to achieve these goals.                                                               

Sincerely,

Timothy F. Geithner

Identical copy of this letter sent to:
            The Honorable Harry Reid

cc:       The Honorable Barney Frank
           The Honorable Spencer Bachus
           The Honorable David Obey
           The Honorable Jerry Lewis

0
Your rating: None



by mr brincq
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:08
#157810

with what fairytale does the "recovery church" now come up with to support these markets....I will wait patiently on the sideline...

by Divided States ...
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:54
#157886

None of those dipshits should have the word HONORABLE in front of their names. Makes me effin sick.

 

by john bougerel
on Thu, 12/10/2009 - 01:09
#158688

"These policies (read slush funds) are working."

 

Remember TARP was to buy "troubled assets" not inject capital willy-nilly into bankrupt and insolvent financial firms. The initial goal was to "save the banking system" the latter goal was to save the banksters. HUGE DIFFERENCE not just in short term outcomes but in long term outcomes for which the American public will pay dearly for Paulson's ginormous indiscretion

by ChickenTeriyakiBoy
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:14
#157817

by Chumly
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:17
#157818

The same clowns who brought about the disaster claim to have saved us from it.

The only thing TTT will have to do next year is change the date on the letter to "October 3, 2011" and add $100 billion here and subtract $100 billion there.

by aint no fortuna...
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:16
#157819

"This extension is necessary to assist American families and stabilize financial markets because it will, among other things, enable us to continue to implement programs that address housing markets and the needs of small businesses..."

Hmm, how noble... to assist American families and small businesses... so, that's what they've been doing... I was kinda curious about their motives there for awhile but that clears it up just fine. 

OK folks, move on...

by tip e. canoe
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:35
#157853

"to assist American families and small businesses..."

...by encouraging them to take on more debt...

by Assetman
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:10
#157983

Wasn't TARP orginally designed to purchase auctioned toxic assets in the financial system?  And then it was actually used... for what?

So now... we are being led to believe that TARP will be used for American families and small businesses.  Yet, the original $700 billion remains in place to make sure the TBTF's get their next capital injections when needed.

Who does Turbo Timmy think he is fooling?

Oh, yeah-- nevermind-- it's CONgress.

 

by digalert
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 13:00
#158027

It's TOXIC

TTGeithner: "TARP will be refocused to aid homeowners facing foreclosure"

This was sold as a family foreclosure saving measure. It's amazing how memories work and these beliefs tend to follow party lines. Everyone, CONgress, talks like this was a bank rescue bill, when at the time only shifty Paulson and bubble Ben knew this was a bank buddy rescue fund.

Toxic turned troubled turned legacy loans, BBBernanke puts $500 bil on a swift boat to foreign banks never to be seen again, AIG, GM, FNM, FRE, MBS... blah blah blah

Here we are a year later and the tax cheat say's we need to help the families in foreclosure. While CONgress (screw the taxpayer) say's we need this slush fund for job creation (magic) and anywhere else we may have bungled and need to cover up.

To further help you forget, let us never use HAMP, HARP, HOPE...in the same discussion with TARP because we know how well that is working.

by Selah
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:16
#157820

Why does Barney Frank have "Honorable" in front of his name?

And why wasn't Dean Martin CC'd?

by TumblingDice
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:31
#157845

This is not a surprise.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:33
#157850

There is nothing honorable about Harry Reid. He has a legitimate chance to be judged by history as the most foul, self centered, and damaging politician in American history...it's a three horse race between him, Pelosi, and Jesus Obama for that title.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:34
#157852

Also, a majority of the Recovery Act funds remain to be disbursed:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/57617
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10223.pdf

- Heretic

by Mad Max
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:39
#157863

I want to see this run through ZH's fraudspeak-to-truth translator.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:42
#157866

In a letter to House and Senate leaders, Geithner said the extension is "necessary to assist American families and stabilize financial markets." Timmy

"The recovery of our financial system remains incomplete," Geithner told lawmakers. "And, near-term shocks to that system could undermine the economic recovery we have seen to do." Timmy

Get ready for a big bang. I smell trouble lurking.

by TheGoodDoctor
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 21:39
#158538

From what I heard from Bob Chapman is that FASB is requiring the banks go back to mark to market at the beginning of next year. 1/1/10.

Also, they will require any loans to be capitalized with 50% cash and 50% collateral to the total of 125% of the loan or no loan.

Now what I am fearing is that they pass the health care bill before the end of the year with some crazy shit on the end of it regarding 401k's, IRA's etc.

I also read that Pelosi is looking to tack on a repeal of the Bush tax cuts ASAP.

Can anyone confirm or deny these items?

by Ragnarok
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:46
#157873

Does thid still have to be voted on?  If so won't there be a shit tonne of opposition? I mean they still haven't raised the debt ceilling yet for fear of backlash before getting healthcare passed (which is looking more likely everyday).

by Cursive
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:04
#157895

According to his letter, Geithner has the authority under the law to extend it without further Congressional approval.  I found this to be the most interesting part of the letter since TARP has always been a Trojan Horse of sorts:

"Finally, we may increase our commitment to the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which is improving securitization markets that facilitate consumer and small business loans, as well as commercial mortgage loans.  We expect that increasing our commitment to TALF would not result in additional cost to taxpayers."

 

by docj
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:05
#157902

What makes you think that this Administration has any intention, or even inclination, of bring CONgress on board for this?  I mean, the EPA is now going to regulate the products of respiration without so much as a debate on crap-n-tax.  I doubt they have any concerns about the extra-Constitutional prolonging this never-really-above-board piece of "legislation".

by Ragnarok
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:52
#157955

I thought I felt something poking me in the ass..... thanks for the clarification.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 10:55
#157887

From the President's speech yesterday:

"So to help support these efforts, we’re going to wind down the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP – the fund created to stabilize the financial system so banks would lend again."

From Timmay's letter today:

"While we are extending the $700 billion program, we do not expect to deploy more than $550 billion."

I remember reading somewhere that whatever President Obama says it is a good bet to expect that the intent is the exact opposite.

This is not only about the midterms but also about TALF and CMBS as Timmay so eloquently states.

Is any of this a surprise, it shouldn't be, so the question is how does one play this for maximum profit.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:01
#157896

Can someone please tell me why no one in congress will ask the most obvious question.

If the Economy is recovering. Then why do we need to extend these programs? Please someone ask the question.

by Taxmetodeath
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:11
#157909

Can someone please tell me why no one in congress will ask the most obvious question.

If the Economy is recovering. Then why do we need to extend these programs? Please someone ask the question.

 

by Silver-Is-Better
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:31
#157919

Can someone please tell me why no one in congress will ask the most obvious question.

If the Economy is recovering. Then why do we need to extend these programs? Please someone ask the question.

They are afraid to ask the question, for they know the answer already.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:38
#157931

Tim probably doesn't have the authority to extend the program. Only congress does but if congress doesn't want a new debate then extend and pretend you have the authority.

by Guy Fawkes
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:46
#157945

Failure! ... giant, ass-sucking failure.

The taxpayer gave Wall Streets biggest banks money with which to gamble. Some still loss while others invested and made money. Woo Hoo ... so fucking what. Wall Street generating positive cash flow is nothing new.

The problem is still the toxic debt which has not gone away. It has been transfered to the Fed's balance sheet in exchange for UST or still sits on the banks balance sheets at 100 cents on the $. It has not gone away! It is only by FASB accounting gimmicks that they have not collapsed under the weight of their unbridled greed.

 

by JR
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:48
#157948

Will the real chief executive please stand up?  Is it the Senator from Illinois who was elected last November?  Or is it someone else whose message Timothy Geithner brings to us in the name of Barack Obama?  Just who is using Mr. Obama’s name to take taxpayer money and give it to_________?  (Fill in the blank.)

by Mad Max
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:03
#157967

The "chief executive" is not the partial-term Senator from Hawaii/Indonesia/Nawlins on the Lake.  Who exactly he/she is isn't clear, but if you look at billionaires who contributed to his campaign you might start getting some ideas.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 11:53
#157957

The 'Taxpayer Ass Raping Program' or 'Toxic Asset Relief Program' or whatever they want to call it has become such a clusterfuck that even 'ole Hank what be impressed by what it has morphed into. I listened to damned near every hearing on this last fall in both the house and senate; TARP was going to be used exclusively to relieve the banks of their 'toxic assets'. Has that even happened? As far as I know, they are still there, waiting for their 'real value' to be recognized. These toxic assets had value, maybe in some alternate universe, and their price just hadn't been discovered yet.

Instead, they just shoveled the TARP money over to the banks in order for them to use to recapitalize themselves. Then it was used to bail out two auto companies that should have been put to rest years ago. Now it is going to be used to 'create jobs'.

I just don't even know what to say anymore.... Just when you begin to think that the ship is about to right itself, this group of jokers we have in office find another means to extend the charade a little bit longer. I wish I had the kind of 'jack' Cash-n-carry has so I could build my own retreat away from this madness, because when this all blows-up, the shock waves are going to be epic.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:36
#158005

If Corzine couldn't buy an election in N.J. what makes them think it's gonna work in 2010.

by JR
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:38
#158007

It’s going to break!  The reason the Fed/Treasury is continuing TARP is because they’re under water.  And it’s getting deeper and deeper and they don’t know what to do.  You know how bad it is? Multiply everything they say by 10.

It’s like a giant iceberg and they’re only chipping away at the top.  They have a massive crisis that now extends to the rest of world.  Otherwise, they would not be taking chances of going deeper and deeper into the economic abyss, of getting people angrier and angrier.  The whole country is turning against them, as well as other nations.  In Britain the people are so opposed to the bailouts that benefit the bankers that they’ve demanded a tax on banker bonuses and pushed parliament into it. 

It’s the government and the bankers working together that have created this. And it’s getting worse.  They are developing a public relations problem you can’t believe.  Why are several politicians all of a sudden speaking out against Bernanke? Why would any politician berate such a kindly, gentle man?  Why don’t the people love someone who’s kept them out of another Great Depression?  It’s because the politicians’ constituents are pushing them and beating them around the head. Every time the government/bankers say they have worked out a program, an agreement, that’s going to do more and cost less, the people know they’re going to get cheated. After a while the people just won’t take it anymore.

The bankers and the Obama Administration have a whale underneath the Good Ship Lollipop. Something’s going to break

by trav777
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 14:10
#158138

they are keeping TARP open because there is no political will for another "Porkulus" bill in the trillion dollar range.

They had 2 9-figure appropriations in the span of a few months, and the people can still do basic math.

Everyone has this sense that we're bankrupt, but wait till it percolates up into the higher consciousness.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 18:18
#158378

I think the "threat" is indeed that posited in the article.
It's time to rush everything that can (still) be gotten with a 60 vote Senate and a compliant House.
After 2010, the Dems will still have the White House and the media. The 2 houses of CONgress are in doubt.

by Zippyin Annapolis
on Wed, 12/09/2009 - 19:21
#158419

What ever happened to the awful CRE  problem? Did Valerie Jarret fix that when no one was looking?

by rayen36
on Thu, 12/10/2009 - 20:16
#159674

Timothy Fuckmythroat Geithner

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.