Congressman Markey's subcomittee held a hearing Thursday on seafood and the oil spill.
Markey got the Food and Drug Administration to admit that fish are not being tested from oiled areas:
The FDA also admitted that it is not testing for mercury, arsenic or other toxic heavy metals, because - wait for it - the FDA doesn't expect to see an increase of these toxins from the oil spill:
But in the real world:
As Bloomberg notes:
is a complex mixture containing substances like benzene, heavy metals,
arsenic, and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons -- all known to cause
human health problems such as cancer, birth defects or miscarriages,”
said Kenneth Olden, founding dean of New York’s CUNY School of Public
Health at Hunter College, who is monitoring a panel on possible delayed
The FDA's statement is similar to NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco's recent assertion that oil doesn't bioaccumulate in fish, and that fish naturally "degrade and process" the oil.
As a former long-time NOAA scientist points out, NOAA hasn't exactly been neutral and objective with regards to Gulf oil spill science:
Ian R. MacDonald, an oceanographer at Florida State University ... sees this latest incident as part of an ongoing problem.
worked with NOAA essentially all my career and I have many good friends
there, and people I respect in the agency, scientists who are really
solid," MacDonald said.
"Throughout this process, it's been
troubling to me to see the efforts of people like that passed through a
filter where the objective seems to be much more political and public
relations than making comments to inform the public.
consistent theme," MacDonald said, "seems to be to minimize the impact
of the oil -- and to act as a bottleneck for information."
Unfortunately, this is how government today operates ... its main activity is simply to try to cover up crises.
The FDA also admitted that it is not testing for the most toxic bioaccumulating metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Hat tip Florida Oil Spill Law.