Scientists note that fear of terrorism makes people stupid.
As I've repeatedly noted,
FBI agents and CIA intelligence officials, constitutional law expert
professor Jonathan Turley, Time Magazine, Keith Olbermann and the
Washington Post have all said that U.S. government officials "were
trying to create an atmosphere of fear in which the American people
would give them more power".
Indeed, the former Secretary of Homeland Security - Tom Ridge - admits that he was pressured to raise terror alerts to help Bush win reelection.
In the real world, as the National Safety Council notes:
-- You are 17,600 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack
-- You are 12,571 times more likely to die from cancer than from a terrorist attack
-- You are 11,000 times more likely to die in an airplane accident than from a terrorist plot involving an airplane
-- You are 1048 times more likely to die from a car accident than from a terrorist attack
--You are 404 times more likely to die in a fall than from a terrorist attack
-- You are 87 times more likely to drown than die in a terrorist attack
-- You are 13 times more likely to die in a railway accident than from a terrorist attack
--You are 12 times more likely to die from accidental suffocation in bed than from a terrorist attack
--You are 9 times more likely to choke to death on your own vomit than die in a terrorist attack
--You are 8 times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a terrorist
--You are 8 times more likely to die from accidental electrocution than from a terrorist attack
-- You are 6 times more likely to die from hot weather than from a terrorist attack
(Moreover, the chair of the 9/11 Commission said that the attack was preventable).
Indeed, much of our debt is due to the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and elsewhere.
So by over-reacting, we are causing real, substantial and lasting damage to our country. (It is admitted
by Bush, Cheney and others that the Iraq war was actually about oil,
and the Afghanistan war was planned before 9/11, but this essay takes at
face value the government's claims that the wars have been for
Reason noted in 2006:
security measures—pervasive ID checkpoints, metal detectors, and
phalanxes of security guards—increasingly clot the pathways of our
public lives. It's easy to overreact when an atrocity takes place—to
heed those who promise safety if only we will give the authorities the
"tools" they want by surrendering to them some of our liberty. As
President Franklin Roosevelt in his first inaugural speech said,
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself— nameless, unreasoning,
unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat
into advance." However, with risks this low there is no reason for us
not to continue to live our lives as though terrorism doesn't
matter—because it doesn't really matter. We ultimately vanquish
terrorism when we refuse to be terrorized.
In April, Reason pointed out:
people will focus, much of the time, on the emotionally perceived
severity of the outcome, rather than on its likelihood.” They add, “With
respect to risks of injury or harm, vivid images and concrete pictures
of disaster can ‘crowd out’ the cognitive activity required to conclude
and consider the fact that the probability of disaster is really small.”
Activating the emotional centers in the amygdala shuts down the
operation of the executive functions of the pre-frontal cortex. Taking
advantage of this flaw in reasoning, the researchers observe, “In this
light, it should not be surprising that our public figures and our cause
advocates often describe tragic outcomes. Rarely do we hear them quote
probabilities.” In other words, politicians and activists deploy sob
stories to scare the public into demanding regulations on activities
“If we look across dozens of cases, we
can observe a pattern in which salient but extremely low probability
risks are sometimes met with excessive responses,”
H.L. Mencken memorably summarized this democratic dynamic: “The whole
aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of
hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”
Indeed, politicians have known for thousands of years that playing the fear card gives them more power and makes their subjects more compliant:
"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector."
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
- U.S. President James Madison
"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death".
- Adolph Hitler
of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the
leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ...
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of
terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal
security is threatened".
- Josef Stalin
Unfortunately, while politicians regularly terrify people with gruesome reminders of 9/11 and exaggerated stories about future terrorism risk, they ignore the high-probability risks - like the destruction to the economy through unchecked fraud and corruption, nuclear plant and deep sea oil rig operators which cut every corner in the book, and the loss of our liberties and the rule of law.