You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

The Fed Finger: More Observations On The ESH0 Incident

Tyler Durden's picture




Fidel Sarcastro submits:

What happened at 12:03pm Eastern Time?  There were no reports out, the 10-YR Note auction wasn’t until 12pm, and the S&P500 was a bit stonewalled just under 1137.00 after a rally from the day’s low.  As the market advanced slowly through the congestion it hit: a MASSIVE order, or series of orders, lifted the offer in the e-minis.  But it wasn’t your garden variety large order of 2,000 mini’s – I’m talking about 114 times that size.

At 11:03am today at the Chicago Board of Trade (12:03pm EST) over a quarter of a million mini-S&P500 orders traded north of 1137.00!  (228,000 last count)

I looked at the attached chart in disbelief.  Could this be real I wondered?  Was it some sort of computer malfunction that added too many zeros to the reported, yet smaller, trades? 

No, that’s not what happened.  In fact, a bit of a hullabaloo occurred around my trading booth on the floor of the CBOT as many locals, brokers, and compliance members stared at the aforementioned volume chart in disbelief.  As it turns out, all of the trades were indeed valid.  None were busted.  Moreover, as one of the compliance members told me, he saw the trades listed sequentially (1,000 or 2,000 lot orders) and they all occurred with milliseconds of one another until the massive order was completed.

This order size takes a SERIOUS bankroll to get done.  If you are wrong by one-point on a 228,000 lot ES order, you can say goodbye to $11,400,000.00.  If you contemplate this size your margin requirement is $1,282,500,000.00, while the notional value is $12,961,800,000.00.

Has a new “playha” hit the scene?  Is his nickname “Helicopter?”  Has high frequency trading (HFT) taken root in the mini-S&P in a huge way?

In the end it may turn out to have been a “cross trade,” where one institutional firm prearranges a large order with another to clear it in an orderly fashion.

As of now I don’t have a firm answer, but whether it was HFT activity, the “Helicopter,” or a massive cross trade, it sure set the bottom in for the afternoon.  Everyone in the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P pits were talking about it and nobody was willing to sell into that massive bid.

Trade well and follow the trend, not the so-called “experts.”




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 01/13/2010 - 23:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/13/2010 - 23:38 | Link to Comment Deep
Deep's picture

sorry guys i admit it ,it was me, i was placed the trade, meant to be 200 contacts, not 200,000. sorry for the trouble i may have caused.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 02:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 09:28 | Link to Comment E pluribus unum
E pluribus unum's picture

Hey, I can take three or four of those off your hands if you want to diversify your portfolio a little. You take food stamps?

Wed, 01/13/2010 - 23:43 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

Well when you don't have a PR then a "Fat Finger" will have to do.

It's not like anybody is going to waste any investigative resources on it... not with Mary handling the SEC, besides nobody listens to the blogs anyway....

Wed, 01/13/2010 - 23:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 09:00 | Link to Comment huntergvl
huntergvl's picture

The only current position I have in the stock market is a S&P short and I even feel foolish having that hanging. I need to do a gut check on why I am still calling my investing strategies, 'investing,' instead of fantasy lotto or some similar strategy. Market transparency is zero, fundamental correlations change with the weather, even the obvious manipulations seem to have no consistency. I have to admit I don't trade on the hour, but in reality I don't feel comfortable making trades by the day, week, month, or even year. The stock market has become a charade, a ponzi, a confidence game where even the grifters aren't sure who the marks are. I can't compete with Bernanke, Geithner, HFTs, and when the president of the United States recommends that I buy equities in a national televised speech, I am positive, it is all just one giant shell game. I have come to the conclusion that the most important investment strategy I can employ at this time is to have assets outside the boundaries and reach of the US government. Japan will our Weimar republic event and when their currency goes bust, so will all others with inherent weakness. Hard assets are the only alternative I see, but our country has a history of simply confiscating these during periods of crisis, so my hard assets must be located outside the continental US, and of course they sure won't be located at UBS. Is there any chance the Large Hadron Collider can project a singularity into the center of Washington DC and just suck all the scum into a black hole? Maybe even that wouldn't be enough as the slime covering most of them would probably allow them to slither past the event horizon, unscathed. Our leaders have become untouchable, our economy is a sham, and tensions around the world are beginning to resemble a hornet's nest. Thank god for good Puerto Rican Rum.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 09:22 | Link to Comment blueskyscottsdale
blueskyscottsdale's picture

re: last sentence. Try Gosling's Black Seal Bermuda rum. In Bermuda they mix it with Coke and call it "Dark 'n Stormy" with good reason.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/15/2010 - 12:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/13/2010 - 23:51 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

I don't believe a cross trade would be handled through the exchange like that. Maybe some deep pockets figured out how to mind-f$ck the HFT computers into hyperventilating?

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:25 | Link to Comment fox
fox's picture

That would be cool

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:01 | Link to Comment TaggartGalt
TaggartGalt's picture

A friend forwarded this after the close:

ESH0 Event today-Between 11:03 and 11:04 CT today, there were a series of transactions in ESH0 in which a market participant appears to have inadvertently traded approximately 200,000 contracts as both buyer and seller.

From: CME Globex Control Center [mailto:swnalert@sendwordnow.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 3:54 PM
Subject: ESH0 Event
 
Between 11:03 and 11:04 CT today, there were a series of transactions in ESH0 in which a market participant appears to CME maintains trade practice and risk management rules and procedures respecting such matters.  In keeping with standard practices and CME's self-regulatory responsibilities, CME is reviewing the circumstances of this event.

So, if these rapid-fire 1000, 2000 lot trades were between the same entity, but at sequentially higher prices, this would indicate blatant market manipulation.  At a cost of $11.4 million per point in a worse case scenario, this is peanuts from the helicoper above.

Investigate, identify, and prosecute these criminals!

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:03 | Link to Comment ptuomov
ptuomov's picture

Thanks for this note.  Now this makes more sense.  When do the index options expire again?  Is it in any way possible that the maximum pain point was above the Wednesday 12 noon ET?  ;-)

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:10 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

Why wouldn't two institutional buyers handle this off-market in a dark pool transaction?Wash trades give the appearance of volume, but carry no risk to the manipulator, only that margin be posted.  $1.2B would be a large player, but who says the CBOE required that margin?  Compliance?  Yeah, I'm sure they were all over it.  The trades were meant to lift the bid.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:00 | Link to Comment ptuomov
ptuomov's picture

$12 billion of equities would be a 6% tactical weight shift in a $200 billion asset allocation program (if I can do basic math right).  There are some but not many asset allocation programs with $200 billion notional.

If the offers were being lifted, I guess it's right that this was a buyer initiated move.  I am less surprised about some overconfident GTAA manager swinging for the fences; but who the hell had the balls and the capital to sell it to them?  That shows some confidence in one's computer trading the index basket!  ;-)

 

 

 

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:00 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

Whoever did the trade is up $77,000,000.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:13 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

There was only one counterparty trading with itself.  Come to think of it, that may be the future of the entire market.  Just the FRB trading with itself.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:32 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

To infinity and beyond!

 

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 09:12 | Link to Comment spanish inquisition
spanish inquisition's picture

Wohoo, FRB record profits. That is a special 50% tax I could get behind, FED profits.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 13:21 | Link to Comment Fidel Sarcastro
Fidel Sarcastro's picture

You *SET* the trend?

Wow - Nice to meet you Chuck Norris.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:35 | Link to Comment Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Golden Slacks did it to pay for Overlord B's inconvenience having to be in DC all day drinking tap water out of a dirty glass.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 03:16 | Link to Comment Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

+1111...hilarious, Jim.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:37 | Link to Comment Oso
Oso's picture

Sarcastro, thanks for this.  All of us stared in disbelief at what we were seeing, and you are definitely right, no one in his right mind would sell into this ridiculousness.

 

this begs the question: WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE REGULATORS?!?!!

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 03:18 | Link to Comment Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

They look more like bond vigilantes...

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 00:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 01:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:25 | Link to Comment Fidel Sarcastro
Fidel Sarcastro's picture

It happened an hour before the auction, but right at important chart resistance, thus a new high.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 01:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 01:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 02:08 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

No wonder the Fed is generating such record profits.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 02:45 | Link to Comment RiskAverseAlertBlog
RiskAverseAlertBlog's picture

A mighty big order for a lousy 0.83% gain in SPX, wouldn't you say? Per the cross trade possibility, then, might someone be building a large short position? Seems in this environment a move like this might be construed much as it apparently was. ("Everyone in the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P pits were talking about it and nobody was willing to sell into that massive bid.") Perfect if your intention is to be filled "in an orderly fashion."

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 02:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 03:21 | Link to Comment Rick64
Rick64's picture

Where is the SEC? Well they are busy investigating BOA but not going to indict anybody. They will get to this and discover it was nothing of substance. They always go for the big fish like Martha Stewart. Remember, they nailed her. Good job.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 03:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 05:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 06:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 06:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:01 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

Arrogance has some interesting side effects, particularly when there exists virtually no check and balance.

 

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 15:29 | Link to Comment Cpl Hicks
Cpl Hicks's picture

Yeah, like the health care bill going through Congress(D) right now.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 07:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 07:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 09:53 | Link to Comment mtremus
mtremus's picture

Looking at that ESH0 trade yesterday, with the benefit of this morning's jobless claims, and retail sales numbers leads me to the conclusion that if indeed it was the HELEICOPTER who was responsible for the trade he was no doubt front running this mornings numbers with full knowledge that the news was negative.  He was attempting to put a floor under the market at 1137. Right now 1137 is being challenged.  Will it hold?  We shall see.

 

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:07 | Link to Comment crosey
crosey's picture

I still favor the view that, with a little incentive, algos sparked, took over, scalped, repeated.

We watch this during the upward bias.

When the downward bias ensues, the viewing will be that of epic proportions.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:10 | Link to Comment crosey
crosey's picture

Oh, I almost forgot...when the downward bias ensues, THAT'S when we'll see intervention from the SEC, et.al.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:25 | Link to Comment Instant Karma
Instant Karma's picture

My bad, the trade was mine. It was a mistake though. I meant to buy 1 contract and accidentally bought 223,000. What's the big deal? I'll just dump 'em today. 8-)

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:28 | Link to Comment dan22
dan22's picture

Forcast 2020-Top Officials in the Federal Reserve Criminally Investigated

- A silent change that started after the financial collapse of 2008 gained momentum with the bill to audit the Fed. After the bill was approved everyone could know who got all the money that Ben Bernanke printed during the great panic days of 2008. The public was outraged and demanded an investigation of the Federal Reserve activist throughout the last 100 years. A special investigation was held and millions of pages where opened to public's eye reveling very close ties between the Federal Reserve and the financial elite of the United Stated dating back to 1913. A special committee of subprime court judges announces that part of the activities held by top fed officially where " criminal by no doubt"
http://israelfinancialexpert.blogspot.com/search/label/predictions%202010

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:30 | Link to Comment Fidel Sarcastro
Fidel Sarcastro's picture

It is moments before the open. I have asked around the floor for an answer & there isn't one.  Everyone is in the dark.

On to the open.

 

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:43 | Link to Comment Fidel Sarcastro
Fidel Sarcastro's picture

OK, spoke to someone on the board of the CME and he says it was an error - period.  As in "move along - no more questions please."

Odd thing though - whenever I make an error I seem to be underwater instantly. How did a 228,000 lot order not MOVE the market? How did they cover it so fast?  Come on.

 

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 11:40 | Link to Comment jedwards
jedwards's picture

It seems like all the trades occured at 12:03:37 in the span of 1 second.

So, this tells us a lot, because it's not the case where a trader started an algo, and then realized somethign was wrong and stopped it.  It happened literally in the blink of an eye. 

1 second isn't enough time for someone to react that quickly.  This leads me to believe that whatever the intent of the algo was, it finished to completion.

The other thing to consider is that this didn't move the markets at all, maybe 1 tick.  Since this streamed onto the markets, it should have cleared out all existing trades at those levels, but that's not what you see, even amongst these trades of 200-2000 contracts you can still see small trades of 1-2 contracts in that second.  Each bid this algo sent out was matched for each ask and vice versa, which is the only way that it wouldn't move the markets.

What kind of algo is set up to do something like that?  What sort of algo is set up to exactly match bids and act like a big vacuum cleaner like that?

I'm of half a mind to put on my conspiracy nerd hat and suggest that it could have been an inadvertent test of a PPT-like algo that ensures an orderly matching of all bids coming in, to stop the markets from plummeting too quickly.

I'm not a super-conspiracy nerd but it's simply wrong that the markets didn't move with that level of volume.  Someone showed their hand yesterday, I'm curious to know who that was.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 12:07 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

GOOO!!!  GET TO THE CHOPPER!!!!

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 12:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 12:09 | Link to Comment master che
master che's picture

 

 

 

1/14/10

8:25EST

In short we developed a new pattern yesterday

C/T (Irregular)

Neutral

Equalizer: 1137.25

Up Price Target: 1161.25

Down Price Target: 1113.25

 

Irregular C/T’s majority of the times are reversal patterns

Soon I’ll give the failure/success ratio statistics on this pattern

 

Immediate term : 60 to 120 minutes

I’m expecting a move up to 1145.75.

1146.00 is a key level in order to determine if we continue up

 

The overnight session FR (Federal Reserve was not in the market)

Yesterday they were 14% of the total volume (ES only)

Since the GM bankruptcy and an incredible rally upon the news, I’ve been tracking all the volume on the S.P. Minis; attempting to formulate a conclusion regarding Federal Reserve intervention in the marketplace. In addition I’m currently trying to get a major reputable newspaper to write an article with my volume data (without a address, electronic trading)

 

In my estimate the Federal Reserve currently are long 1,231,295 contracts on the March contract, their average price is 1104.00.

Their margin is hard to say, everyone pays a different price.

Their profit margin is $50.00 per point per contract

Which is roughly $2,000 per contract.

 

The demise or downfall of this market will be the reckless tenor of the Federal Reserve trading the marketplace.  They are not traders. When push comes to shove they will fuck-up up big time, which in turn crashes the market.

This reckless policy jeopardizes the entire financial foundation of the U.S. Government and the U.S. and World Economy.

 

This is extremely dangerous.

 

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 15:15 | Link to Comment 1TAAT
1TAAT's picture

Nice Work Che!! I agree completly

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 18:46 | Link to Comment fox
fox's picture

umm how do you figure?

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 12:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 12:40 | Link to Comment the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

So where would the market have gone if there hadn't been a buyer waiting to handle the block? If you intent is to move the market you could do it with a lot less trading capital. Which points out an inconsistency with trading floors, that is you are big enough to find a buyer for your block, you can do it near or at the market, if you are half big enough you take a beating either buying or selling into the average volume flow. And of course if you're super big like Goldman, maybe the order never passes on the ticker. Inclination is to believe this is a small order, or one of the big boys couldn't find someone to pick up the phone at the other end, AND maybe somebody is in trouble.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 16:17 | Link to Comment Fidel Sarcastro
Fidel Sarcastro's picture

Hmmm, I have heard from two different sources now that 4 banks were involved in this.  It just gets weirder by the moment.

Thu, 01/14/2010 - 19:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/14/2010 - 22:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!