You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

On Fed Intervention and the Blogs

Bruce Krasting's picture




A week ago a great debate was stirred in the financial blog world. As is often the case Zero Hedge was in the middle of the fracas. Mr. Durden penned a piece
that suggested that the Fed was manipulating the auctions in such a way
as to benefit the primary dealers. It got to be a very sophisticated
discussion that brought in some thinking from Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism and John Jansen at Across the Curve.

The
debate is over is far as I am concerned. The Treasury had another
successful auction today of the 30 year. But in order to make it a
success the Fed bought
$27 billion of 15-30 year mortgage paper. The curve is the curve. If
Treasury sells duration while at the same time the Fed buys duration
the net impact to the market is negligible. The near simultaneous
supply and demand is expressed in the Agency MBS/Treasury swap market.
The numbers are so large that only pros are allowed to play. A $27
billion swap trade only benefits the dealers.

This is timed intervention. That is a polite way to say manipulation.










Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 08/14/2009 - 13:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 08/14/2009 - 01:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 08/14/2009 - 12:14 | Link to Comment Neo of Zion
Neo of Zion's picture

Here is your mindf#&%..

if we have a huge stock selloff again (and by huge I mean HUGER) watch the risk trade run TO tres, not away. Tres has amazing power now and the ability to raise taxes, avenues of liquidity that do not exist for other developed nations.

So, US is not as sick relative to the rest of the world, hence capital flows in not out. Despite the financial perversity, US wins for a few more years.

Fri, 08/14/2009 - 13:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 08/14/2009 - 01:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 23:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 21:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 20:23 | Link to Comment rapier
rapier's picture

Did they buy the MBS paper from the PD's? No. They are buying a lot of it from the GSE's. In other words shoveling it into a black hole never to be seen again.

In the big scheme of things the auctions always are a success and 90% of the time the buyers are in the green for at least a few days after the auction. That's been the story since 1983 when heavy Treasury borrowing became a real issue.  It's all same old same old. A well rehearsed dog and pony show.  Attention is directed at one trotting pony this time, another next. 

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 19:56 | Link to Comment halfLife (not verified)
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 18:53 | Link to Comment leathaface
leathaface's picture

The question i have is: if the Fed knowingly implements policy that would be counterproductive, what is the end game for them?

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 19:05 | Link to Comment Rari Nantes In ...
Rari Nantes In Gurgite Vasto's picture

If they mange to get the consumers back to the shops by creating a feel good factor before China find a way to disinvest their massive holding of US treasuries, they will claim  to have saved the World. This is the biggest financial gamble undertaken ever....will it pay off? time will tell. The end game is that they though we were on the verge of financial collapse and that social unrest would have followed, with this gamble the outcome may be the same or not, effectively if they were right about the incoming financial collapse, what they are doing now is buying the biggest digital option available. the result would either 1 or 0.

Fri, 08/14/2009 - 06:15 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

With China's exports down 23% in July (their numbers, so you gotta know it's worse than that), it seems we are not keeping up our end of the symbiotic/parasitical deal.  Businesses here will not be buyers of Chinese goods to hold in inventory going forward in anywhere near the volumes of pre-2008.  At the very least, China has a very real excuse to step down its investment in its No. 1 trading partner.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 18:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 18:16 | Link to Comment cocoablini
cocoablini's picture

Quantitative Easing IS rigging the market. They are creating a supply issue when there is no demand for lower yielding trash

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 18:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 18:14 | Link to Comment cocoablini
cocoablini's picture

I don't think they keep it quiet at all. All the information is scattered across the internet and their behavior patterns. The issue is recourse. Just like the Goldman 'bot, what's the recourse for illegal behavior if it's not enforced or not "illegal." Remember-American Business is legalized stealing.

Look at yesterday's auction:

1) to sell hot shorter notes the market goes down. The risk trade is back on Monday and all those shorter notes sell briskly

2) Somehow, the 10 year auction does OK considering the disfavor bonds are in. Insinuation is primary dealers throw this shit out on the open market and the FED mops it up.

3) The FED then hoses buyers of Tuesdays 10 year bonds by announcing an "end" to easing about 10 minutes after the auctions close. There's a scam right there

4) The dollar races up in reaction to the easing announcement-with bonds crashing-and then the dollar instantaneously crashes back to low 78 DXY again. Somebody dumped right after the minutes were released. That sent Bond prices back up and the dollar cratered

5) In the meantime, the stock market which tries to sell off every morning, gets "trading errors" after dips to prevent a race to cash with an expected dive in the market.

6) Everytime there is sell volume, a miracle hand comes and bids prices up and turns on the NYSE "gremlins" that just can't execute sell orders in a timely fashion.

This is the PPT gone insane with their mandate. It's a Soviet-style control economy and there is zero price discovery in the markets(except for too expensive!)

 

Fri, 08/14/2009 - 06:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 22:44 | Link to Comment Bubby BankenStein
Bubby BankenStein's picture

Interesting summary.

Any predictions of what to expect going forward?

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 18:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 17:51 | Link to Comment robbonds
robbonds's picture


the fed bought mtgs but the durations dont compare to that of a 30yr treasury..on the run 30yr has a 16 year duration...oad of 30yr 5S and 5.5s are are approx 4.2 and 3.5yrs - depending on seasoning etc..they could go longer if rates spike...

the fed did not rig the auctions..thats crazy..you seriously think they could keep that quiet?  come on guys..

Fri, 08/14/2009 - 15:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 20:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 08/14/2009 - 00:27 | Link to Comment datad (not verified)
Thu, 08/13/2009 - 20:17 | Link to Comment Steak
Steak's picture

I profess my ignorance on this topic but to the best of my understanding there are few if any entities that would hold a 30-yr to maturity.  Please elaborate on your point so we can better understand where you're coming from on this.

Thu, 08/13/2009 - 17:40 | Link to Comment cocoablini
cocoablini's picture

I guess a follow up question is in regards to the "open market" purchases of bonds after the auction. Zerohedge also published an article stating that a reader discovered that the FED was buying more treasuries 1-2 weeks after the auction to keep prices from crashing. As such, that is still quantitative easing, just through a backdoor. If so, then the FED is crooning about easing off the easing while still manipulating prices through primary dealer buybacks. The article insinuates that the primary dealers have no interest in owning the bonds and that they are "Asked" to purchase bonds to "front the market" and then passes it off to the Fed later on.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!