This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Fed Must Be Audited: The Fraudulent Practices of the Federal Reserve

George Washington's picture




 

Washington’s Blog

In March 2004, when Alan Greenspan was Fed chairman, he suppressed the opinions of those Fed officials who knew that there was a housing bubble.

Congressman Alan Grayson points out that - because the Fed unilaterally decided to hand out half a trillion to foreigners without any Congressional oversight, and that Bernanke testified that he didn't know who got the loot - the Fed must be subject to an audit.

Yves Smith and Tom Adams - in analyzing the Fed's lack of full disclosures regarding its extraordinary rescue operations - conclude:

Even a cursory inspection of the Fed’s disclosures of its extraordinary rescue operations shows them to have been made only under duress, and then to be incomplete and deliberately unhelpful.

The reason this matters, is that, contrary to the Fed’s claims of independence, it has been operating as an extra-legal off balance sheet entity of the Treasury, circumventing normal Constitutionally-stipulated budget processes. And rather than make adjustments in its practices to reflect its enlarged and now overtly political role, the Fed has instead been engaging in cynical, blatant misrepresentation, giving lip service to the idea of greater transparency in public, while fighting disclosure tooth and nail.

Since the Fed has entered into an openly political stance (and this dates back to Greenspan) and cannot be relied upon to make truthful and complete disclosures, the only recourse is to put it on a much shorter leash, which includes greater scrutiny, including third party validation. The Fed has brought on the audit demands via the unabashed and repeated abuse of its privileged role.

 

***

 

The Fed seems awfully keen to steer clear of the fate that befell Lehman. Lehman was grossly and verifiably misvaluing some investments, namely Archstone and SunCal, that confirmed doubts about the veracity of its accounting. If you can’t check any particular valuations, it’s a lot harder to ask difficult questions. And unlike Lehman, the Fed can continue to account to no one.

The Fed is engaging in same practices that caused the crisis: failure to make timely disclosures, obfuscation, use of off balance sheet vehicles to distance itself from losses. This posture alone should disqualify the central bank from assuming a greater regulatory role.

The Fed and Treasury’s three card monte operation is anti-democratic and possibly illegal, and to add insult to injury, voters are treated as if they have no right to know when they are ultimately footing the bill. The Fed’s persistent stonewalling and deep seated hostility toward the public provide ample proof of the need for an audit.

The Fed argues that an audit would interfere with its monetary policy decisions. That is incorrect for at least two reasons.

Initially, the bills to audit the Fed specifically provide that no outside agency will interfere with the Fed's monetary policy decisions.

More importantly, decisions about what toxic assets should be accepted by the Fed as collateral, how such assets should be valued, and who bailout funds should be given to are wholly separate from the Fed's core monetary policy decision: raising or lowering interest rates.

Adjustment of interest rates has been the primary lever the Fed has applied to the economy since it's formation in 1913.

The Fed has also recently started using a radical new tool: replacing the money multiplier with interest payments for excess reserves deposited with the Fed. Personally, I strongly disagree with this as a policy tool because I believe that - in the name of preventing inflation - the Fed is guaranteeing prolonged deflation and the lack of a sustainable recovery. However, this is arguably an exercise of core monetary policy by the Fed.

But funneling hundreds of billions to foreign nations and foreign banks, accepting worthless junk from the too big to fails and marking it at unrealistic valuations, and doing the other things which the Fed has been doing recently are not core monetary functions. Congress never authorized these actions when they passed the Federal Reserve Act.

Therefore, the Fed's actions must be made transparent and subject to the light of day.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 05/05/2010 - 08:21 | 332209 silvertrain
silvertrain's picture

 yes, all gold must be tested by hong kong..

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 05:18 | 332115 Rick64
Rick64's picture

The FED and the government will sacrifice every bank and even the TBTF's to avoid this at all costs. The markets and economy would free fall. The pain would be severe, but the long term potential of setting the course for the future would be well worth it. The citizens would have to remain active or we would repeat the present corrupt and futile system. We have to demand accountability.

 Another basic reason to audit the FED (which would be the first step in dismantling it), they have been very unsuccessful in their monetary policies despite having no downside.

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 05:01 | 332111 RighteousRampage
RighteousRampage's picture

We all know this only ends one way.... It may take a while, but eventually the US Gov't will be forced to nationalize the Fed, and the cycle will start anew.  Maybe the fourth time will be the charm.

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 08:52 | 332252 mikla
mikla's picture

"Eventually" means in the next twenty-four months.  And, agree that the cycle starts anew.

The only difference is that I give better-than-odds that the US Federal government will go into default, and break up, with the states coming out as sovereigns.

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 09:50 | 332418 koaj
koaj's picture

the states are already soverigns. they just need to adjust their skirts a bit

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 04:10 | 332101 CEOoftheSOFA
CEOoftheSOFA's picture

If you read "The Smartest Guys In the Room", substitute "Enron" with "The FED", and you will have a good idea of what is going on. 

 

Either the FED is dismantled, or the United States will be. 

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 16:02 | 333160 farang
farang's picture

Sounds good to me. Can for the life of me see what their function is except to makes us all debtors, and savers be damned.

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 16:08 | 333173 akak
akak's picture

What is truly pathetic is how even so many of the supposed defenders of "capitalism" in the USA instinctively and explicitly support what is essentially a Soviet-style central planning committee, i.e., the Federal Reserve.  Such an unaccountable, cronyistic, monopolistic central planning committee has NO place whatsoever in any free-market system.  Their existence is a travesty of every precept of free-market capitalism, and a crime against the American people.

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 17:42 | 333338 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

"Such an unaccountable, cronyistic, monopolistic central planning committee has NO place whatsoever in any free-market system."

 

The main reason our markets don't function anymore and why the economy is so fucked.

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 16:22 | 333199 Whizbang
Whizbang's picture

being able to spend money without raising taxes, essentially stealing through stealth, proves extremely hard for most politicians to resist after getting a taste for the first time. After that they are hooked. Think of the fed money as crack for politicians. In exchange for free "rock" they'll let the fed do what ever it wants to them, and their families.

Very sad.

Thu, 05/06/2010 - 03:55 | 333965 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Very sad maybe still dont see how it is bad to the US. Some US citizens might not profit from the deal but the US is built on the dichotomy winner/loser and the FED cannot turn every US citizen in a winner in an absolute way (as it turns them in a relative way)

Arent politicians supposed to do what is good for their country?

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 03:45 | 332089 Tic tock
Tic tock's picture

Step-by-step; in the first instance any administration needs to have reliable measurements: so let the GAO do a full and frank audit. I would like to see an OECD working group formed specifically to suggest multilateral reforms.  

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 18:14 | 333384 Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

I'd like to see ZH staffers do the audit. I wouldn't trust the GAO to know what they were looking at.

Audit the Fed Mugs and Tshirts available at the Zh fundraiser

www.zazzle.com/Howard_Beale

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 03:03 | 332081 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

I am wondering when the administration is going to start selling private shares in the Defense and Justice Departments to enhance their independence from politics...?

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 09:01 | 332275 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

DOD and DOJ IPO

Brilliant!

How do I get on the preferred list? For the stock, not the screwing. :>)

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 13:39 | 332885 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Oh, don't forget the real power calf's . . The obtaining of shares in other semi-private ventures that will interface with the newly freed departments. Law firms, courts, armaments manufactures, the banks & insurance firms that fund these activities.....   Oh, damn, now we would have the basis for "balancing" between the independent agencies and departments...

Privatize !!! ROFLMAO

Wed, 05/05/2010 - 07:54 | 332188 hardmedicine
hardmedicine's picture

oh, plus 10 .... haha

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!