This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Fed Throws $3 Billion At Market Via Second-To-Last POMO

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Today the Fed repurchased $2.949 billion of 7 year bonds via its second to last POMO. There is $2.7 billion of dry powder left: one last arrow in the QE quiver, best used on yet another down day.

Here is the cumulative UST balance: $2.7 billion left. QE2?

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:19 | 97569 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Chump change.  Beat this, $4B a day.

http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/mbs/

Gross purchases from October 1 through October 7: $51,840 million
Net purchases from October 1 through October 7: $20,000 million


Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:15 | 97648 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

I liken it to chemotherapy. The Fed trades the banksters cash for poisoned mortgage backed securities and other crap, and hopes the systemic effect of all those toxic assets sickens the dollar just enough to kill the cancer (by creating inflation) without flat lining the entire economy.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:27 | 97580 ArkansasAngie
ArkansasAngie's picture

There is no way they can shut the printing press off unless ... they stop spending money.

The fact that there are no buyers is not a problem.

Since all currencies are relative ... in the process of devaluing the dollar ... we do so to the world as well.

Dang ... I hope they don't get pissed off.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:30 | 97581 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The end is very fucking nigh.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:31 | 97582 rhinotrader
rhinotrader's picture

So what happens when that is done? Has it happened before? 

 

Sincerely,

 

Still short

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:40 | 97587 uno
uno's picture

Ok ZeroHedge Community, I respect most everyone here.  Could you give me feedback to the following which I sent to Rep Grayson and Rep Ron Paul.  I am not a redistribute the wealth fan, however in WALL Street this year I have to make an exception.  Here is what I sent to Rep Grayson:

 

Message Text: Mr. Grayson, I have much respect for you and Ron Paul for your efforts on exposing Wall Street Corruption. I emailed Ron Paul a minute ago, and wanted to include you also with a thought. I know Wall Street companies are going to announce RECORD bonuses this year AFTER being BAILED OUT. How about taking that bonus money (hopefully 100%) and putting it to the SERVICEMEN and SEVICEWOMAN mortgages. Wall Street Caused and PROFITTED from their horrible mistakes, please let's reward good people and NOT REWARD corruption. THANKS
Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:55 | 97606 Oso
Oso's picture

+1

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:55 | 97607 Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Why are servicemen/women more deserving than the rest of us?  It's an all-volunteer military.  I'm a good person too, and I do a lot more for the country than many of the more mundane military job classes who nonetheless qualify as "servicemen."  Not a whole lot of the military is personally facing enemy fire any more.  Some of them have jobs not far removed from getting paid to play videogames.

I took a mortgage I could afford and have made all the payments on time.  I even completed my mortgage application truthfully!  Why don't I deserve a bailout?  I'm far more worthy than all those NINJAs who probably should be in prison or deported to some place like Guam.  Thanks to them, the mortgage-fraud-enabler industry (aka "FIRE") and the banksters, my house is worth less than I paid for it, my cash is worth less in spending power or gold than it was, my stock portfolio is slaughtered, and my country is sliding downhill fast.  Bail me out.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:05 | 97627 serendipitous_one
serendipitous_one's picture

No slight to our servicemen/women...I'm a veteran of the first Gulf War....but have to agree with Mad Max's post.  Just because they have volunteered to serve, shouldn't make them any more deserving of a bailout than the rest of us. 

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:08 | 97631 uno
uno's picture

I especially think the soldiers facing fire, daily patrols in Afghanistan and Iraq deserve special treatment, as well as the ones who have been serverely injured, handicapped.  Some jobs are support, logistics in the states, I do feel they should not be the priority.

These soldiers (facing fire) do sacrifice much more than you and I sitting here.  We are safer because of them.  I am not in the military.  It seems they are forgotten or taken for granted by the MSM and citizens in general.

I feel we have a responsibily to help them first.  I guess you either feel like this or not.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:19 | 97653 uno
uno's picture

I am very grateful for the responses.  The pay the soldiers receive is horribly small, many take this path because of the high unemployment.

I understand this is a dangereous precedent, I cannot fathom seeing the leeches on Wall Street profitting from the mess they cause.  If it cannot be returned to the tax payer (who bailed them out), then let's help those who are most deserving, I think it's the soldiers.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:53 | 97711 koaj
koaj's picture

how about returning it to the kids of taxpayers who funded this crap?

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 14:16 | 97772 Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

"These soldiers (facing fire) do sacrifice much more than you and I sitting here.  We are safer because of them.  I am not in the military.."

Let me state that I am in no way anti-military.  I seriously considered joining the army, and I have numerous relatives who have served.  I would like to make some pragmatic comments:

-conditions for front-line troops and the more endangered supply line troops in 'Stan and Iraq do suck.  Perhaps a change in the level of combat pay would be a more reasonable and fair approach to this than some byzantine bailout scheme.  Also keep in mind that most soldiers get moved around every 2-3 years, generally between communities with a large military presence, so their mortgage situation might be quite different from the rest us.

-Another great thing to do would be shortening their tours of duty!

-While we're at it, why not provide adequate funding and oversight of the VA hospital system?

-How about adequate equipment for the troops, like body armor and armored vehicles?  I guess this is mostly taken care of now, but sure wasn't a few years ago.

-Best of all, why not bring them home from W. Bush's fantastic wars of foreign conquest.  He gets a special prize for picking the country where empires go to die.  Alexander the Great was the last outsider who could make any claim on having conquered that country, and even that didn't hold.

There is also the fundamental issue that excessively glorifying the military tends to be a tool of dictators and tends to result in a totalitarian state.  There are a few small exceptions (US propoganda during WW2, maybe) but this is the general rule.  It's much better to keep the military small by keeping the need for military force small.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 14:46 | 97828 uno
uno's picture

I know the responses are in no way anti-military.  My fear is next we would be buying mortgages for public school teachers; then some other special interest category.  Paying more and the veteran hospitals are very good suggestions.  Bringing them home I agree with, Iraq overwhelmingly does not want us there.

The spending by this government (republicans and democrats) can only end in disaster, either a new currency or purchasing power decline of 50%.  Anyway, thanks Mad Max, serendipitous_one, koaj, oso and Anonymous (for the funny picture).  I'm sure nothing will come of my email, I did not send money with it.

Wed, 10/14/2009 - 05:59 | 98509 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Let's support our troops by removing them from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Please don't tell me about fighting those big bad terrorists over there so we don't fight them over here. This is bullshit propaganda. These wars are wars of empire and imperialism. We want to control that part of the world. Thus we fight wars there.

Bring the troops home.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:46 | 97690 Anonymous
Tue, 10/13/2009 - 14:39 | 97823 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

excellent idea because i know the wall street conservatives in NYC would never want to be seen as not supporting our men and women in uniform...and yes extend the program to all veterans

ps all exxon mobil oil profits from oil procured from iraq should also be devoted to veterans

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:44 | 97591 Stuart
Stuart's picture

 2nd last POMO...right!   My A$$!

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:45 | 97593 TraderMark
TraderMark's picture

2nd to last?

lets not count our chickens...

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 12:58 | 97614 ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

Ya mean penultimate?

From Wiki..

The related words penultimate and antepenultimate refer to the second-to-last and the third-to-last item in a series, respectively.

Just showin that we too can obfuscate the simpler things ;-)

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:13 | 97644 FLETCH
FLETCH's picture

Anyone who thinks this is the last POMO better think again

Within 3 months the next 500B will be allocated

 

 

 

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:27 | 97666 deadhead
deadhead's picture

Within 3 months the next 500B will be allocated

I'm guessing your timing might be a bit early but we will need Rahm Emanuel to clear that up depending how he sees the mid terms unfolding.

Though it is said that only a fool can make market calls, I'll take that risk and say this: do not even think of shorting the u.s. equity markets next september, october, and early november.  don't.even.think.about.it.

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:29 | 97669 Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

+1

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 13:44 | 97686 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

ghost beat me to it.....

Considering the amount still thrown at the MBS market you also need to consider that the QE "policy" is what is reported. They have bought MUCH more than they report...bet on it.

MS

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 14:40 | 97826 deadhead
deadhead's picture

i wonder if the spy shares held at stt are considered off balance sheet?

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 14:13 | 97766 BennyBoy
BennyBoy's picture

One more POMO then the market needs its annual October "rest".

It'll make sure there won't be a big coupon spike.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Just like last year.

BB

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 14:14 | 97769 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Once the S&P drops below 900 another round of QE will be announced which should probably be right around the end of this year or early next yr. Do you really think Ben Bernanke is going to say no to these thugs on wall street?

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 16:18 | 97958 George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

I know that to be a trick question, but I'm going to answer....Ben won't say no to the thugs.

Am I right? Am I?

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 17:48 | 98074 Bear
Bear's picture

Sorry George, Ben is a thug!

Wed, 10/14/2009 - 01:01 | 98463 George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Ben is the thug, why didn't I answer, Ben is the thug.  Ask me again?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!