This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Federal Reserve Modern History 101

PragmaticIdealist's picture




 

If Americans (or other citizens) ever hope to regain some semblance of control over their monetary system, they must be able to clearly understand exactly how the federal reserve system functions and its destructive potential. People must understand that, in times of 'loose' monetary policy, 'setting a target federal funds rate' can be more accurately characterized as effectively 'printing and giving away enough money to provide subsidization for unnaturally low lending and borrowing rates'.

Further, when the Fed engages in sustained low interest rate targeting, this is akin to an "all-clear" signal to the larger member-banks that now is the time to load up on Treasuries and other useless assets that the Fed mindlessly pays cash for to achieve policy goals. This effect is especially pronounced in the midst of a struggling economy, when banks can be more certain that the Fed will be under intense pressure to maintain rock-bottom interest rates. Talk about moral hazard.

If primary dealers can clearly gauge the extent of the Fed's interest in maintaining abnormal levels of liquidity (such as during a financial crisis or struggling economy), they can increase their demand for both risk assets and Treasuries accordingly to benefit from the imminent Fed action. Seeing a higher federal funds rate as a result of irresponsible lending and leverage, the Fed will be obliged to purchase over-valued Treasuries from the primary dealers thereby rewarding them! If the Primary Dealers predict the action of the Fed (which is based on their own irrational action), they will make a lot of profit. Even when the Fed uses a reverse-auction mechanism to buy the Treasuries, the total demand for Treasuries has risen to an unnatural level in the described scenario. The difference between the value of Treasuries that could be sold naturally and the value of Treasuries actually sold is the amount of monetary inflation created.

There are currently 18 primary dealers in the US, and each one has the capacity to manipulate the federal funds rate at will. The more that these banks are able to borrow from each other and "invest" in anything from subprime mortgages to Pets.com, the more that the federal funds rate is likely to spike and induce further Fed intervention (read: free money!) Member-bankers are able to leverage themselves to their eyeballs, investing in whatever garbage comes across their desks and, as long as the "assets" invested in are of sufficiently large duration, they will continue to be highly profitable for a long while as the Fed diligently prints money and floods the system with artificial liquidity incited by the excessive risk-taking.

But don't take my word for it, look what the Fed themselves have to say in their publication entitled `The Federal Reserve System: Purposes and Functions`:

During most of the 1970s, the Federal Reserve targeted the price of Federal Reserve balances. The FOMC would choose a target federal funds rate that it thought would be consistent with its objective for M1 growth over short intervals of time. The funds-rate target would be raised or lowered if M1 growth significantly exceeded or fell short of the desired rate. At times, large rate movements were needed to bring money growth back in line with the target, but the extent of the necessary policy adjustment was not always gauged accurately. Moreover, there appears to have been some reluctance to permit substantial variation in the funds rate. As a result, the FOMC did not have great success in combating the increase in inflationary pressures that resulted from oil-price shocks and excessive money growth over the decade.

In other words, once the Fed had decided to target interest rates on reserves, the Banks were off to the races with their lending and borrowing activities and counting on the Fed to continue a policy of rate suppression (i.e., conduct open market purchases to keep rates low, essentially giving out free cash and replenished reserves in exchange for already bidded-up Treasuries). The Fed told the banks: "Don't lend unscrupulously, or else I will continue to buy your inventory of overpriced junk with freshly printed coin. Oh, and I'll make sure interest rates are tantalizingly low for you." What is a prudent bank to do but to go bananas? The bankers' response? "Sure, our loans may not perform over decades, but imagine all the free money we will be inciting once the Fed reacts! And interest rates are so low it's practically a steal!"

Of course, until the unexpected Mr. Paul 'the Party Pooper' Volker stepped in at least.

By late 1979, the FOMC recognized that a change in tactics was necessary. In October, the Federal Reserve began to target the quantity of reserves—the sum of balances at the Federal Reserve and cash in the vaults of depository institutions that is used to meet reserve requirements—to achieve greater control over M1 and bring down inflation. In particular, the operational objective for open market operations was a specific level of nonborrowed reserves, or total reserves less the quantity of discount window borrowing. A predetermined target path for nonborrowed reserves was based on the FOMC’s objectives for M1. If M1 grew faster than the objective, required reserves, which were linked to M1 through the required reserve ratios, would expand more quickly than nonborrowed reserves. With the fixed supply of nonborrowed reserves falling short of demand, banks would bid up the federal funds rate, sometimes sharply. The rise in short-term interest rates would eventually damp M1 growth, and M1 would be brought back toward its targeted path.

 

In other words, the bankers, desiring to incite the Federal Reserve into flooding the system with ever-increasing liquidity, had tried their damndest to manipulate the federal funds rate and get the Federal Reserve to cave in and further debase the currency. However, the Federal Reserve academics had learned their lesson! They would simply allow the interest rate to spike and wait for the bankers to slow down their demand for borrowing once they realized they could not cause the Fed to budge.  After admitting defeat in this battle, do the bankers go back to the drawing board? Is the Pope Catholic?

By late 1982, it had become clear that the combination of interest rate deregulation and financial innovation had weakened the historical link between M1 and the economic objectives of monetary policy.

Translation: bankers realized that they could indirectly influence the price of credit by "innovating" new and unconventional sources of funding such as swaps, repos and other goodies. These new channels for leverage made the Fed sit up and take note:

The FOMC began to make more discretionary decisions about money market conditions, using a wider array of economic and financial variables to judge the need for adjustments in short-term interest rates.

Check mate! Or...

Beginning in the mid-1980s, spreading doubts about the financial health of some depository institutions led to an increasing reluctance on the part of many institutions to borrow at the discount window, thus weakening the link between borrowing and the federal funds rate. Consequently, the Federal Reserve increasingly sought to attain a specific level of the federal funds rate rather than a targeted amount of borrowed reserves. In July 1995, the FOMC began to announce its target for the federal funds rate.

In a circular turn of events, we end up at the original strategy we discussed, with the only caveat being that the bankers now have complete awareness as to what is in store. Bravo, Fed. Bravo.

And once the bad lending finally caught up with the banks and they started taking massive write-downs, what better way to make sure the Fed keeps interest rates abnormally supressed than for the TBTF banks to engineer a global financial crisis. Especially since the Fed now takes "a wider array of economic and financial variables" into account when deciding monetary policy.

Of course, as the Fed does not disclose the details of its operations, all of this is pure speculation.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 11/10/2010 - 06:14 | 715606 cheap uggs for sale
cheap uggs for sale's picture

It’s a interesting news,i like it.Additionally,wellcome to my website prettyboots.org ,here are so many UGGS On Sale such as:UGG Elsey wedge|UGG Elsey wedge black|UGG Elsey wedge chestnut|UGG Elsey wedge espresso|UGG Langley|UGG Langley black|UGG Langley chestnut|UGG Lo Pro Button|UGG Lo Pro Button black|UGG Lo Pro Button blue|UGG Lo Pro Button cream|UGG Mayfaire|UGG Mayfaire black|UGG Mayfaire chestnut|UGG Mayfaire chocolate|UGG Mayfaire sand|UGG Mayfaire red|UGG Nightfall|UGG Nightfall black|UGG Nightfall chestnut|UGG Nightfall chocolate|UGG Nightfall sand|UGG Sundance II|UGG Sundance II black|UGG Sundance II chestnut|UGG Sundance II chocolate|UGG Sundance II sand|UGG Ultimate Bind|UGG Ultimate Bind black|UGG Ultimate Bind chestnut|UGG Ultimate Bind chocolate|UGG Ultimate Bind sand|UGG Ultra Short|UGG Ultra Short chocolate|UGG Ultra Short sand|UGG Ultra Short black|UGG Ultra Tall|UGG Ultra Tall chestnut|UGG Ultra Tall sand|UGG Ultra Tall balck|UGG Ultra Tall chocolate|UGG Suede|UGG Suede black|UGG Suede chestnut|UGG Suede sand|UGG upside|UGG upside black|UGG upside chestnut|UGG upside mocha|UGG Roxy Tall|UGG Roxy Tall black|UGG Roxy Tall chestnut|UGG Roxy Tall chocolate|UGG Roxy Tall sand|UGG seline|UGG seline black|UGG seline chestnut|UGG Corinth Boots|UGG Liberty|UGG Liberty black|UGG Liberty cigar|UGG Highkoo|UGG Highkoo amber brown|UGG Highkoo espresso|UGG Highkoo grey|UGG Highkoo black|UGG Knightsbridge|UGG Knightsbridge black|UGG Knightsbridge chestnut|UGG Knightsbridge grey|UGG Knightsbridge sand|UGG Knightsbridge chocolate|UGG Adirondack|UGG Adirondack brown|UGG Adirondack chocolate|UGG Suburb Crochet|UGG Suburb Crochet black|UGG Suburb Crochet chestnut|UGG Suburb Crochet chocolate|UGG Suburb Crochet grey|UGG Suburb Crochet white|UGG Kensington|UGG Kensington black|UGG Kensington chestnut|UGG Roseberry|UGG Roseberry black|UGG Roseberry sand|UGG Gaviota|UGG Gaviota black|UGG Gaviota chestnut|UGG Gaviota chocolate|UGG Desoto|UGG Desoto black|UGG Desoto chestnut|UGG Desoto chocolate|UGG Brookfield Tall|UGG Brookfield Tall black|UGG Brookfield Tall chocolate|UGG Gissella|UGG Gissella black|UGG Gissella chestnut|UGG Gissella espresso|UGG Payton|UGG Payton black|UGG Payton chestnut|UGG Payton red|UGG Bailey Button Triplet|UGG Bailey Button Triplet black|UGG Bailey Button Triplet chestnut|UGG Bailey Button Triplet chocolate|UGG Bailey Button Triplet grey|UGG Bailey Button Triplet sand|There are so much style of cheap uggs for sale ,so once you go to my website you will be very surprise.

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 07:19 | 594289 skippy9
skippy9's picture

The Fed is not the enemy. They merely try to repair the damage done by the egocentrics in Washington who use the money of hard working Americans to help any so=called minority that will vote them back into office. "Every American should have the right to own their homes." Really! "Every American has a right to free health care." Really!Need I continue?

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 06:38 | 594269 Pseudo Anonym
Pseudo Anonym's picture

Primary Dealers do not predict actions of the Fed to front-run the Fed. They find out what Fed's puppeteer's plans are. Whose hand is up Reb Shalom Bernookystein's ass? That's what I want to know.

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 06:15 | 594263 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

So the Fed is obviously rigging the value of the dollar yet the USA accuses China of doing the same thing.

Pot meet Kettle.

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 05:21 | 594247 Moonrajah
Moonrajah's picture

Once we start seeing a change in citizenship (paperwise and/or real) of prominent names in the US financial system, we will know for sure that the endgame is just around the corner.

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 04:48 | 594237 Djirk
Djirk's picture

Ridiculous that the country looks to the Fed to solve the economic problems.

The FED is a bank, banks "make" money.

The big daddy bank is going to take care of the other banks first and foremost. Inflating away debt is the best way to save face and "make" more money. We will all be richer!!!

Fjukin Free basers

Fed should clear checks, keep enough liquidity in the system for commerce and stay away from the rest of the economy.

And Ben, get a hair cut, you look like Crusty the Clown

 

 

 

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 04:43 | 594234 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

Anybody wants to buy some MAGIC BEANS?

If you put them in the ground, they will grow money trees!! 100$bills, 50$ bills ANY BILLS!!!! 12 HARVESTS A YEAR!

They only cost 100oz of gold!!!

BARGAIN PRICE!!! DON'T MISS THIS ONE OUT!!! YOUR NEIGHBOURS MIGHT ALREADY HAVE ONE!!

 

PS: WE DO NOT EXCEPT PENSION IOU'S

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 00:15 | 594008 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

The Fed has bullets left.  The only problem is that they are putting them in the suicide weapon.  Strike "problem" and make that "solution".

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 04:41 | 594235 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

BULLET THROUGHT THE HEAD!!!!

 

Tue, 09/21/2010 - 00:15 | 594007 rumblefish
rumblefish's picture

"

Good article. The only problem is that the author refers to the Federal Reserve being separate from the banks. They are the same entity. The Fed is comprised of the big U.S. banks.

This must be made clear to the public, for the public doesn't read or understand monetary policies. We must speak in layman's terms to John Q Citizen."

maybe a cliffnotes version of The Creature from Jekyll Island.

Mon, 09/20/2010 - 23:20 | 593928 dot_bust
dot_bust's picture

Good article. The only problem is that the author refers to the Federal Reserve being separate from the banks. They are the same entity. The Fed is comprised of the big U.S. banks.

This must be made clear to the public, for the public doesn't read or understand monetary policies. We must speak in layman's terms to John Q Citizen.

When Bernanke refers to the system or calls banks systemically important, he's referring to the banks whose officers sit on the board of directors of the Fed. These are the banks that are insolvent. These are also the banks that control Congress and the country itself.

So, once again, tell the American people that the big U.S. banks are the Federal Reserve. Then tell them that it's time to dissolve the Fed.

Mon, 09/20/2010 - 23:12 | 593917 doolittlegeorge
doolittlegeorge's picture

good speculation tho.  what is more interesting and factually true since the guys who did have "admitted to their crimes" are all the uber-profitable businesses who were obliterated because "there was no credit from 68-83" who then due to access to "free money from the government" were had for cents on the dollar by former treasury officials from the Reagan days.  these "lost industries" were then sold "for hundreds of millions" thus creating among others "the thing called KKR" which still has one of the world's most awesome buildings.  needless to say "this was just the beginning."  we were minting billionaires by the late 90's mainly by "buying some failing business and selling off subset so and so for a fortune."  these business were always in the "high rent areas of indiana and tennesee" (ha, ha.)

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!