This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Fed's Racket Exposed

Tyler Durden's picture




 

A reader provides us with the following letter he received from Senator Mikulski in response to dissatisfaction expressed about Bernanke's reconfirmation. The response from the Senator demonstrates precisely the type of intellectual racket that the Fed is exposing gullible and incompetent senators to, in forcing them to pass law after law that is only in the Fed's, and thus Wall Street's interests, as the alternative would always be a "market nose dive." Enough with the pandering. If senators can not think and verify independently, they should be replaced immediately with people who are capable and qualified to make critical decisions about this country without Wall Street's influence.

Thank you for getting in touch with me about Ben Bernanke's nomination to chair the Federal Reserve.  It's great to hear from you.

Americans are angry and they are anxious.  In diners and at the dry cleaners, I'm hearing tremendous anxiety about the economy.  People are feeling like their middle class way is slipping away, and that brings a lot of anger, fear and frustration.

When Chairman Bernanke thought Wall Street was on the verge of a crisis, he acted dramatically.  He used new powers for new programs.  Well, the job market is in a crisis now.  But the Fed's response has been tame and tepid.  We need the same urgency from the Federal Reserve to jumpstart the job market that was given to Wall Street to jump start the financial markets.

I voted to confirm Mr. Bernanke because he is not a man of ideology.  When we needed him the most, his expertise and level-head probably helped prevent a catastrophe.  Bernanke didn't panic and he took his lessons from economic history, a subject which he has studied closer than anyone else.  No one understands the risks the economy faces better than he does.

I was advised that rejecting his nomination would cause markets to nose dive, which would hurt retirees and families saving for their future.  I am not enthusiastic in my support.  But I think Mr. Bernanke understands the job that he still has to do.

We need bold new approaches - and I'll fight for them.   I let Mr. Bernanke know that I am focused on three things to get our economy going again: creating jobs, getting more lending to the middle economy and small businesses, and helping people get out from under the threat of foreclosure.

Thanks again for getting in touch with me.  Knowing of your views was helpful to me.  Please let me know if I can be of any assistance to you in the future.

Sincerely,
Barbara A. Mikulski
United States Senator

And for the counterpoint, here is an example of a Senator who does not fall for the Fed's racket:

Dear Friend:

Thank you for contacting me. I appreciate hearing your thoughts about President Obama's decision to nominate Ben Bernanke for another four-year term as Chairman of the Federal Reserve (the Fed). I voted against approving Mr. Bernanke, who was nevertheless confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 70-30.

My opposition to Mr. Bernanke is based on a number of concerns about his actions during both the run up to the financial crisis and the crisis itself. Before the financial crisis hit in 2008, Mr. Bernanke failed to either diagnose the housing bubble or adequately protect consumers from many of the abusive financial products, especially credit cards and mortgage loans, which helped to contribute to that bubble. These mistakes helped to precipitate the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, and while Mr. Bernanke has taken bold and creative steps to help stop the bleeding, I believe that his record prior to the crisis does not warrant him a second term as Chairman.

In the midst of the crisis, I am also concerned that the Fed has provided an unknown number of financial institutions with billions of dollars at almost zero interest without appropriate transparency or accountability, including to the insurance giant AIG. While the current economic crisis has certainly made increased action by the Fed understandable, it is inexplicable to me that the Fed has taken such unprecedented action without putting conditions on these loans that would require the funds to be used to make loans to small businesses, or would restrict the payment of unwarranted bonuses. In addition, the Fed has refused to inform Congress or the public the extent of these financial commitments. For this reason, I am a cosponsor of S. 604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act of 2009. This legislation would require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct an audit of the Federal Reserve and submit those findings to Congress to determine what commitments the Fed has made in response to the financial crisis.

Finally, I am troubled that, in the wake of the financial crisis, Mr. Bernanke has argued against creating an independent consumer financial protection agency. It is painfully clear to me that the Fed's failure to protect consumers from abusive products in areas like credit cards and mortgage loans helped to fuel the spiral of debt that contributed to the economic downturn. Given the Fed's abysmal failure in this area, I find it remarkable that Mr. Bernanke wants to give the Fed more authority. This neglect for adequate consumer protections is unacceptable to me, and I am not convinced that Mr. Bernanke would behave any differently now than he did before the crisis.

While I have heard the concerns of many that the failure to confirm Mr. Bernanke would have damaged the financial markets and jeopardized our economy recovery, I do not believe that anyone, including Mr. Bernanke, is too big to be replaced. We should not hold our economy hostage to the Wall Street threat that total economic collapse is the sure result of not doing everything they want.

Thanks again for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to do so again about this or any other issue that may concern you.

Sincerely,
 
Tom Harkin
United States Senator

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:26 | 366191 Duuude
Duuude's picture

Intellectually honest?!?!

She's an idiot.

If she admits that...hmmm...well, she did...Jesuit training here...well then, you are right.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:36 | 366220 I am a Man I am...
I am a Man I am Forty's picture

geez, she's not a sunday school teacher, she's a senator, which makes her a liability

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:49 | 366265 akak
akak's picture

"Actually Barbara Mikulski isn't that bad. Oh, she's left of Lenin in her views, but she sincerely believes she's helping; ie. she is intellectually HONEST, and not dishonest as you know many in Congress are."

Dammit, was that ANOTHER good intention that I just tripped over?

This road to Hell is just LITTERED with those damned things!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:56 | 366288 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

*snort* funny.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:03 | 366314 Ragnarok
Ragnarok's picture

+10

 

Road to hell = serfdom ?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 16:00 | 366457 merehuman
merehuman's picture

no friend , the road to hell is paved with lies , greed and stupidity.

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:32 | 366388 dumpster
dumpster's picture

listen in...  she got a drivers license .

and drove a big rig over the cliff... but dang she can drive a toyota just fine

just because the wreck caused 45 deaths doesn't mean .. she was not current on renewing the license

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:23 | 367080 bigkahuna
bigkahuna's picture

Alright, fuck 'em--let me get my torch.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:09 | 366136 AxiosAdv
AxiosAdv's picture

Another politician that can't tie her own shoes.  None of these folks save for a very distinct few understand that taking our medicine NOW is better than kicking the can down the road.  The longer the problems exist the worse they get eventually making it impossible to recover.  We need to consider stricter requirements on serving in office.  Too many ignorant people in DC.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:08 | 366137 Wynn
Wynn's picture

For the loser now
Will be later to win
For the times they are a-changin'

Sooner than they think

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:40 | 366232 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

My guess is that a lot of these worthless congress-people will be hanged in their hometowns, and they honestly won't understand why. They really won't.

How sad is that?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:08 | 366140 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

If senators can not think and verify independently, they should be replaced immediately with people who are capable and qualified to make critical decisions about this country without Wall Street's influence.

Seriously, I can count the number of people on one hand who can think and verify independently (present company included). 

As long as a Senator or Congresspersons election (reelection) is primarily based on how much money they can raise for their campaign, i expect nothing to change (in fact expectations would dictate a deterioration from here).

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:51 | 366431 Muir
Muir's picture

Good point Lucy

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 16:04 | 366468 Vix_Noob
Vix_Noob's picture

how many fingers did you lose on that hand?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 20:39 | 367016 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

As long as she still has her thumb and at least two others does it mater?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:09 | 366141 johnmilan
johnmilan's picture

Scared ass congressmen           Does any of them really have any clue or just go with the flow?  There is no one with a logical dominant voice.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:53 | 366278 akak
akak's picture

This statement from Mikulski could not have been any more laughably demeaning and intellectually insulting if she had just simply summed it up as:

"I wanna make things gooder better, and I'm gonna!"

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:28 | 366375 Mark McGoldrick
Mark McGoldrick's picture

You betcha!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:43 | 366409 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

you guys are on a roll today (SP reference appreciated...)

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 02:54 | 367356 John_Coltrane
John_Coltrane's picture

She's got the "audacity of Hope" though!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:12 | 366142 silvertrain
silvertrain's picture

Jesus christ.wtf is going on here...

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:28 | 366201 Duuude
Duuude's picture

WTF is going on here?!?

I'm actually gettin emotional about all of this, gotta Slide...

As Time Goes By......

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:12 | 366143 Great Depressio...
Great Depression Trader's picture

Seriously her perspective on the matter sounds like she reads CNN money for her information. We need jobs, we need to lend to consumers and businesses? How the fuck are we going to lend to already overleveraged consumers and businesses? How the fuck are we going to "create" jobs if the US CONgress continues to allow multinationals to outsource american labor to 3rd world sweatshops?

This bitch, alongside the majority of CONgress, know nothing about how the system works, let alone what it is.

 

EPIC EPIC FAIL

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:12 | 366144 FitBusinessman.com
FitBusinessman.com's picture

"I was advised that..."

Read: I was too dumb to think for myself and do my own research regarding the topic.

Please: Get an education. You swore to uphold the constitution and do what is in the best interest of the American people.

Bottom Line: Don't step in the arena unless you are ready to fight. If you are voting on important issues that you know nothing about, you better actually read what you are voting on and spend every waking minute educating yourself on the fallout that can happen from listening to your "advisors".

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:55 | 366286 John Self
John Self's picture

And Stan O'Neal, Jimmy Cayne and Dick Fuld were all advised that real estate would forever go higher.  Does she really think there's any legitimacy to that clause?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:12 | 366146 Hansel
Hansel's picture

I am now dumber for having read that drivel.  Not a man of ideology?  We averted catastrophe?  We need more lending (debt)?  This is hopeless.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:16 | 366159 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Was there ever any hope?

Accept defeat and move on.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:35 | 366212 Hansel
Hansel's picture

I, defeated.  Where should I move to?  I'm too young to have profited handsomely from the ponzis.  I am stuck where I am for at least a while, it seems.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:47 | 366254 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Stay put. Wait. Pay attention.

Shortly the walls are going to come down and the barbarians of Want and Desperation and Anger will come streaming in. Stay put, keep a weathereye on the walls. And when the barbarians are at the gates turn to your compatriots and remind them of what made this country great, once. Of hard work, of creating value, of passing on something real and worthwhile to one's children. Of making the world a place to thrive foremost, and not a place to get rich quickly. People will want at that very point, as the gates come off the hinges, to know what they should do.

What they should do is, start over. From the beginning. With feeling.

You tell them that, because in the end starting over is all you have.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:53 | 366279 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

I was just reading my little Cato copy of the Declaration of Independence this morning. Inspiring and dangerous stuff.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:59 | 366302 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Written by hard-assed fuckers ready to die for an ideal, but more interested in having that other guy die for his ideals, or else GTFO.

With that behind you, words ring. And true words are true power.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:10 | 366328 Ragnarok
Ragnarok's picture

"hard-assed fuckers"  LOL

 

I wish I could remember the name, but one of the delegates lost both his sons and all his fortune fighting the revolution.  Talk about sacrifice.  I imagine when push comes to shove the barbarians will just want to start the ponzi scheme all over again.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:21 | 366364 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

The Swamp Fox, Francis Marion I believe.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:35 | 366391 Duuude
Duuude's picture

Cougar

Superb post.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 16:02 | 366464 hedgeless_horseman
hedgeless_horseman's picture

Fuck-n-a Bubba.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:13 | 366148 Kat
Kat's picture

If they're so gullible and incompetent, WTF are the doing in the Senate passing laws?

If we elect these incompetent boobs, then we get what's coming to us.

bend over, people.  Bend over.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:01 | 367055 Mr Creosote
Mr Creosote's picture

Those who can do.

Those who can't teach.

Those who can't teach run for Congress.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:14 | 366152 Au Member
Au Member's picture

Vote monkey get monkey

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:14 | 366153 BlackBeard
BlackBeard's picture

Nice.  If this is leadership, then we're so fucked.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:28 | 366196 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

The evisceration of Congress started 40 years ago.

Money and business and Martha Stewart won out. The country lost out. Obama is the crowning achievement of 40 years of beating the fuck out of anyone with a spine.

It's just downhill from now, freinds. At the end of the empire, the women won't allow you to fight to survive.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 16:52 | 366629 PhD
PhD's picture

Indeed, in death we will all be equal.

 

Mission accomplished.

 

A small sacrifice for such a grand cause

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 17:26 | 366701 Hulk
Hulk's picture

spot on cougar.pretty soon boys will be born with no balls, as nature gets rid of that which is no longer used...

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:16 | 366157 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

In a similar vein, here is the letter I received from Dianne "Worthless" Feinstein regarding my support for 'Audit the Fed' language (i.e. original Sanders amendment, or Vitter amendment) in the financial "reform" bill. It is clear to me that the watered-down Sanders amendment was designed as lip service to the public clamoring for Fed Transparency.

Thank you for contacting me to express support for legislation to increase transparency at the Federal Reserve.  I appreciate hearing from you, and I welcome the opportunity to respond. 

 

The Senate is currently debating Wall Street reform legislation (S. 3217).  On May 11, 2010, I supported an amendment to this bill offered by Senator Bernard Sanders (I-VT) that would significantly increase transparency at the Federal Reserve and require an audit of its emergency lending activities.  Specifically, it would require the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct an audit of the Federal Reserve within one year of the bill's enactment.  However, it would not allow the GAO to audit the Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions or normal lending activities through the "discount window."  Additionally, it would require the Federal Reserve to disclose the names of financial institutions and foreign banks that received emergency financial assistance dating back to the start of this economic downturn.  This amendment passed the Senate by a vote of 96-0. 

 

As you may know, Senator David Vitter (R-LA) offered a similar amendment that would have required an audit of all Federal Reserve activities, except for unreleased transcripts from meetings of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.  I joined 61 of my Senate colleagues in opposing this amendment because such disclosure could have harmful impacts.  For example, exposing the Federal Reserve's normal lending functions could lead to a run on a bank perceived to be in poor health.  Additionally, such disclosure could prevent the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors from making interest rate decisions free of outside influence. 

 

I agree that the trillions of dollars lent out by the Federal Reserve to stabilize the economy should be accounted for.  The amendment offered by Senator Sanders would bring transparency to these activities, which is where I believe it is most needed.

 

The House-passed version of Wall Street reform legislation includes a provision that is similar to the amendment offered by Senator Vitter.  The House and Senate will likely reconcile the differences between their respective versions of this legislation in a conference committee in the coming months.   Please know that I will keep your concerns in mind as I monitor these negotiations as they relate to the Federal Reserve. 

 

Once again, thank you for writing.  I hope that you will continue to share your views with me.  If I can be of any further assistance, please contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841.  Best regards.

Sincerely yours,
 Dianne Feinstein
         United States Senator

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:19 | 366168 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Ah yes, Feinstein.  That cuntwhore will make a sad lamp post look bright and happy again once she's dangling from it.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:30 | 366204 Duuude
Duuude's picture

If They're In They're Out

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:37 | 366223 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

+1000

brutal! I like it!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:57 | 366292 akak
akak's picture

I'll bring the tar and feathers!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 18:06 | 366785 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Knocked that one out of the park.

Take a bow, Mr. High Potentate.

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 10:31 | 367551 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

I have had six good laughs reading these comments, that's my Sat. morning quota.  Thanks.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:16 | 366160 chet
chet's picture

Advised by the Fed itself, no doubt.  Wall Street is using legal blackmail in Congress every day.  "The market will tank, the market will tank."

We need the market to tank now so that this argument will be toothless.  See how much pull the bankers have when the S&P is already at 400.  "Best and brightest creating value" my ass.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:21 | 366177 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

Agreed...and this means the Fed, Treasury, Primary Dealers, and anyone else pulling strings behind the scenes, will be in total Plunge Protection mode. I wonder how much gas they have left in the tank?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:39 | 366229 silvertrain
silvertrain's picture

They dont have any more gas on this system, but are going in for a fresh fill up..SDR's..Which, btw, is printed out of thin air, without being backed up by anything..There going to try to do the same thing all over again from scratch, yeeppiieee, we get a mulligan...

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:56 | 366290 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

I just heard one of the talking heads on Bloomberg asking someone about the probability of a global coordinated central bank intervention. The person didn't think we were there "yet". But that might be something they try before moving on to the SDR's, Amero's, Obama-bucks, etc.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:58 | 366294 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

I wouldn't assume the blackmail is legal. I'd like to see her letter forwarded to the Justice Department, we need to know who is offering these "advisements" and in what manner. This may be illegal.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:20 | 366169 MacedonianGlory
MacedonianGlory's picture

She must be the next PM in Greece. How long G-Pap is going to be in power? There is going to be a lack good servants in Greece soon.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:28 | 366171 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

"his expertise and level-head probably helped prevent a catastrophe.  Bernanke didn't panic and he took his lessons from economic history, a subject which he has studied closer than anyone else."

Wow. This guy thinks Ben is some kind of "expert" who really knows what he is doing. This is so comical.

"I do not see a housing bubble" Ben Bernanke circa 2007

"Sub-prime is contained and will not spread" Ben Bernanke circa 2007

With "experts" like this who needs complete fuck ups who don't learn from history and get it wrong every step of the way?

1. Ben did not "prevent catastophe" - open your eyes you blind mouse. The U.S and Global economy are in almost the worst shape in history.

2. The FED is the reason the economy is fucked up in the first place.

3. Ben is making it much, much, much worse with every dollar he prints on his HP desktop. Moral hazard? fuck it, no such thing.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:29 | 366202 dumpster
dumpster's picture

This guy lol

Barbara,,  . 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:57 | 366293 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

did you see 'her' picture? the jury might still be out...

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:00 | 366304 akak
akak's picture

Suddenly, for some strange reason, I have a hankering for a pear.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:36 | 366396 Duuude
Duuude's picture

Only Bellysnort of tha day. Thanks Akak.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:47 | 366422 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

i dunno - must be my coffee. i've been rolling this entire thread.

lol

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:07 | 367065 Tapeworm
Tapeworm's picture

Can you imagine what the poor slob from the escort service that is paid for by "her" contributors thinks when he pulls that number?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:35 | 366392 dumpster
dumpster's picture

LOL

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:57 | 366297 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

I wanted to say "this used piece of travel luggage" but I gave her the benefit of the doubt and just called her a man.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:20 | 366173 Traianus Augustus
Traianus Augustus's picture

I got a similiar response from Bill Nelson.  These ass-clowns continue to push this end of the world/only man for the job bs.  These civil servants will soon understand their place in history.  Their lack of understanding/judgement has provided them with just enough rope.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:22 | 366178 Gobsmacked
Gobsmacked's picture

<sadpanda>

 

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:24 | 366184 Manbarepig
Manbarepig's picture

Surprised this post doesn't have a FAIL tag...

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:35 | 366214 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Hmm, that's a good suggestion.  Instead of "flag as junk" it should instead be "FAIL".

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:24 | 366185 Stu
Stu's picture

ot but ...

S. Korea to convene emergency meeting of top military generals

http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2010/05/20/0200000000AEN20100520002100315.HTML

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:25 | 366190 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves.

Andrew Jackson

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:11 | 367070 Mr Creosote
Mr Creosote's picture

+1

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 10:34 | 367554 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

"You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out."
- Andrew Jackson upon evicting from the Oval Office a delegation of international bankers. 1862

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 12:57 | 367693 Mr Creosote
Mr Creosote's picture

Andrew Jackson died June 8, 1845.

Should I prepare for the 2nd coming of FDR?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:26 | 366192 MaxVernon
MaxVernon's picture

Unfortunately for me I cannot write my Senator since I'm not located in the USA.

 

You people who can write a Senator, and who apparently already have, are you attempting to actually educate them as to why they are so wrong?  It would seem to me the next logical step.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:41 | 366234 Cincitucky
Cincitucky's picture

Why bother wasting time educating these cronies? 

These spineless government officials are the definition of incompetence, that's why they're there.  To do the bidding of their masters.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:50 | 366252 hedgeless_horseman
hedgeless_horseman's picture

Through disintermediation one can dramatically reduce the impact these morons have on one's life. 

If you don't approve, then stop feeding them.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:53 | 366268 anony
anony's picture

How old are you Max?  Just asking becaue no mature person would think for a second that learning disabled multiple peronsality disordered sociopaths can be 'educated'.  Witness, George W., B. Clinton, and thousands of others.

They have an agenda. Which is top secret.

The right way to think of our government is: EVERYONE in our government from the Bamster to the lowliest bureaucrat is part of a gigantic orchestra. An orchestra made up thousands of people playing thousands of instruments.

But who is the one person in an orchestra that doesn't make one, single solitary sound?  Not even peep?  And upon whom without which the entire orchestra would fall into discordant sound?

The Conductor.

Our 'conductors' are the men behind a curtain, unelected, unseen, unheard, and totally in control of our courts, our laws, our politicians. 

The conductors, the Maestros (Greenspan was actually called by that illustrious title while he was engineering the most devastating financial crisis in global history) are allied with each other and live in an entirely different world than the people they rule. They can actually borrow money for nothing and lend it out at 33%.  Now how difficult would it be for you, Max, to become a gazillionare if you could manage to do that? Think of the power it must take to simply sit at your desk make a call and get a trillion dollars no questions asked to do whatever you want with it. 

There are many other examples but just to help disabuse you of the notion that our votes, letter, phone calls, e-mails, faxes, threats, and bribes mean much, I thought I'd list at least a couple.

 

 

 

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 20:06 | 366962 Apostate
Apostate's picture

How is it top secret?

Plenty of new recruits to the military have high clearance ratings.

Material gets leaked to the press, friends, and family constantly. No one can keep their mouths shut - they all tend to spill their "master plans" in their autobiographies and to favored members of the press.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:12 | 366338 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

I doubt my representatives actually read my letters - they probably have staff do it, or maybe even sort them electronically with keyword searches. In fact I know the letters I send via a website are already sorted by topic, because they make you click a box (Economy, Unemployment, etc.).

Regardless, I provide enough information in my letters that the addressee should see I know what I'm talking about, and I tell them clearly why what they're about to do is wrong for the country. I have seen no evidence that they understand anything further than perhaps poll numbers one way or the other, which are in any event secondary to campaign contributions and the Party line.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 16:58 | 366640 Apostate
Apostate's picture

The staff read the letters. Only the Washington staff will generally deal with political issues. Local offices usually handle casework and relations with municipal governments.

If you want to get an audience with a Congressman or a Senator, you need to represent a voting bloc that can be counted on to vote a certain way every time.

A sort-of good way to get attention is to create a petition with a lot of mass. As in - physical mass. Something that weighs 20 pounds that's difficult for the office to ignore.

Single letters and anything electronic will be easily ignored.

High quality letterhead (like the kind used by lawyers) can also get you more attention.

If you're just a rabble that can't be counted on to vote in a bloc every election (for decades on end) no congressman will be interested in pandering to you.

That's the way the system works. 

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 01:17 | 367279 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

so... you're saying that in order to be noticed by the person we elected to represent our interests to our leadership...

we we need to group together into a like-minded group, formally establish our interests (show of hands?), formulate a specific message, then elect someone to carry that message to our ...

wait a minute...

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:13 | 367071 Tapeworm
Tapeworm's picture

It does zero good to contact them. All that I get is a "thanks for sharing..." reply.

 All that is left now is to show the correspondence to my valued employees and to help them prepare. From 85% of them that found me to be nuts in 2007, I don't have a one that finds me to be over the top, which is scary enough in itself.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:26 | 366193 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

The market crash is INEVITABLE. Using it as a poltical pessure tool is FUNNY.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:32 | 366206 rmsnickers
rmsnickers's picture

She sounds like the female version of Lennie from Mice and Men.  Mentally retarded with great physical power...wait, that sounds like all of CONgress and politicians in general.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:31 | 366207 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Why is this story not the basis for a racketeering investigation? "You'll vote the way I want you to if you know what's good for you."

We will look back on these sad days and we will talk openly and knowlingly of the great treasons that brought the country down. It won't help us feel any better about it, but it will be the truth.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:48 | 366255 Busy-Body
Busy-Body's picture

I'll consider it a modest victory if we can look back at these days and talk openly................

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:03 | 366318 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

It could go either way, couldn't it, from here.

Fear can liberate, and fear can enslave. I sense we are already far down the path to enslavement. Perhaps we can turn that around. I'm confident we will. I am not confident we can turn it around without hanging some people, though.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:44 | 366414 Crab Cake
Crab Cake's picture

We're not being robbed.  We are indentured servants being told we're free.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:36 | 366213 Astute Investor
Astute Investor's picture

"I was advised that rejecting his nomination would cause markets to nose dive, which would hurt retirees and families saving for retirement..."

I would like Senator Mikulski to explain how ZIRP is helping retirees and families "save" for retirement....?

If she had two brains, she'd be twice as stupid!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:35 | 366215 SilverIsKing
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:13 | 366344 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

My eyes!! The goggles do nothing!!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 16:17 | 366509 Al Huxley
Al Huxley's picture

Awesome, I just choked on my coffee from laughing.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 16:36 | 366572 akak
akak's picture

That's not Barbara Mikulski, that's Benny Hill!

But I can see where one might be confused.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 17:00 | 366646 Shrimp Head
Shrimp Head's picture

Brilliant!

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 18:08 | 366786 nuinut
nuinut's picture

she(?) clearly shares some dna with his guy... jabba.jpg

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:36 | 366217 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

NOVEMBER INCUMBENT BLOODBATH

MAKE IT HAPPEN!!!

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:00 | 366305 hound dog vigilante
hound dog vigilante's picture

I'll second that motion...

These corrupt establishment two-party asshats still think this is a Red/Blue thing... and the media has been trained to reinforce the two-party meme, ad nauseum.

 

The US is a one-party state, and that one party is the corporate fascist party. 

Citizens are starting to figure this out. The useless incumbants from both parties MUST be voted from office. The Mass. election and this week's primaries are/were paradigm changing events, yet the media and DC beltway crowd STILL AREN'T GETTING THE MESSAGE. The toothless, pointless financial "reform" bill is definitive proof of this fact.

INCUMBANT BLOODBATH in NOVEMBER. 

It's time to take scalps and display them with pride and determination.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:45 | 366418 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

It will take 3 cycles of gerneral elections to get all of the current vermin out.

Any new vermin will need to be dealt with. When you want to stop street supply you focus on the wholesale connections and take them out. By the same token, we need to focus on the lobbyists and take them out. Only an anti-lobbying bill with teeth can stop it. Only an electorate that DEMANDS IT will get it done.

And it will take 3 general elections to convince this filth that only cares about money and wealth that the electorate has had ENOUGH OF THIS FUCKING SHIT.

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:17 | 367079 Tapeworm
Tapeworm's picture

I see that you find legislation to be the key to fixing this.

 Grow up.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:38 | 366222 Seal
Seal's picture

Dear Mr. B: Thank you for contacting me to express support for legislation to increase transparency at the Federal Reserve. I appreciate hearing from you, and I welcome the opportunity to respond. The Senate is currently debating Wall Street reform legislation (S. 3217). On May 11, 2010, I supported an amendment to this bill offered by Senator Bernard Sanders (I-VT) that would significantly increase transparency at the Federal Reserve and require an audit of its emergency lending activities. Specifically, it would require the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct an audit of the Federal Reserve within one year of the bill's enactment. However, it would not allow the GAO to audit the Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions or normal lending activities through the "discount window." Additionally, it would require the Federal Reserve to disclose the names of financial institutions and foreign banks that received emergency financial assistance dating back to the start of this economic downturn. This amendment passed the Senate by a vote of 96-0.

 

As you may know, Senator David Vitter (R-LA) offered a similar amendment that would have required an audit of all Federal Reserve activities, except for unreleased transcripts from meetings of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. I joined 61 of my Senate colleagues in opposing this amendment because such disclosure could have harmful impacts. For example, exposing the Federal Reserve's normal lending functions could lead to a run on a bank perceived to be in poor health. Additionally, such disclosure could prevent the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors from making interest rate decisions free of outside influence. I agree that the trillions of dollars lent out by the Federal Reserve to stabilize the economy should be accounted for. The amendment offered by Senator Sanders would bring transparency to these activities, which is where I believe it is most needed. The House-passed version of Wall Street reform legislation includes a provision that is similar to the amendment offered by Senator Vitter. The House and Senate will likely reconcile the differences between their respective versions of this legislation in a conference committee in the coming months.

 

Please know that I will keep your concerns in mind as I monitor these negotiations as they relate to the Federal Reserve. Once again, thank you for writing……………. Sincerely yours, Dianne Feinstein United States Senator

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:15 | 366349 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

As I suspected. Fucking form letter sent to the (likely) hundreds who wrote in supporting Audit the Fed.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 17:00 | 366644 Apostate
Apostate's picture

Aw.

Every congressional staff member who's been around for a while can forge their boss' signature by rote. For everyone else, there's a rubber stamp.

Man, her interns must be slipping... what a crappy letter.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:40 | 366231 Common_Cents22
Common_Cents22's picture

We deserve CONgress when we don't do any due diligence and keep re-electing total idiots.

 

The propagandist left wing media doesn't help any either as most of the population doesn't get past a one sentence sound byte, headline, or tweet.

 

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:46 | 366247 economicmorphine
economicmorphine's picture

It's not the left wing media's fault that the public doesn't care.  It took a concerted effort on the part of government to dumb down the schools, make narcotics readily available and keep the checks coming to pull that off.  The left wing media is just a bit player in this here drama.  I mean, with ratings going down the toilet, nobody believes the left wing matters any more except, of course, the left wing media.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:12 | 366336 SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

Exactly.  Most people have their heads buried in the sand and remain clueless as to what's going on in the world.  If people did their homework rather than basing their decisions on what they see on the 11 o'clock news, we'd be in a much better place.  It is truly unbelievable how horrific many of the incumbents truly are.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:26 | 366371 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

When was the last time you voted against someone promising lower taxes, more jobs, better climate for business, and less government.

Because I don't think I've yet to hear a candidate espouse anything less, nor anything remarkably challenging. People like to think they can vote themselves a better life, and politicians feed that weakness.

When you want a revolution, you won't be able to vote it in. You'll have to lead it yourself.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:49 | 366426 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

that pretty much covers it.

"When you want a revolution, you won't be able to vote it in. You'll have to lead it yourself."

bumber-sticker of the YEAR!

+++

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 17:46 | 366747 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

prophetic, poetic on our country pathetic

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 17:46 | 366748 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

dup

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 18:59 | 366857 tip e. canoe
tip e. canoe's picture

your turn to be on a friday roll cougar.

you should contribute a post on this very topic.

could stimulate some meaningful discussion.

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 03:13 | 366859 tip e. canoe
tip e. canoe's picture

dupe

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 19:12 | 366881 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

I vote against people promising that shit every time, because I know they don't mean it. Especially if they're either a Democrat or a Republican.

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 01:21 | 367287 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

or independent?, or libertarian?, or green?, or ... ???

heh

dad always said that anyone interested in political position has inherently proven their lack of qualification.

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 01:48 | 367311 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

no doubt. I do vote libertarian when I have the option though.

The only guy in our current government I would vote for now is Ron Paul. But I don't live in Texas.

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 02:06 | 367329 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

that's been my 'protest' vote for years (libertarian/constitutionalist). locally, we've got a 100-year dem regime here. never gonna change. still proudly have my Dr Paul-2008 decal on my car to this day.

kind of a "i told you so" to the traffic. i don't think they get it yet, tho'.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 19:41 | 366918 calltoaccount
calltoaccount's picture

   speaking of total idiots, msmedia is not left wing--but corporate.  They protect themselves and their advertisers and business models and advance pov's that profit them w no concern for truth or public interest.  

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:42 | 366236 economicmorphine
economicmorphine's picture

Mikulski's explanation is almost identical to my Congresspimp's explanation about why he had no choice but to vote for TARP.  That's about when I figured out that the time writing to my elected officials was better spent at Tractor Supply Company looking for pitchforks, torches and good strong rope.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:44 | 366240 Gloomy
Gloomy's picture
The Swiss franc defence cost a billion a day in April

The Swiss Central Bank has just released its monthly statistics — things which are likely to attract plenty of interest, given recent rumours of central bank currency intervention.

The raw data is available here.

But we’ll leave it to the ever-eloquent Sean Corrigan, of Diapason Commodities, to break it down:

Data just released show that the SNB increased its holdings of foreign currency by an extraordinary CHF28.5 billion in April – almost CHF1 billion a day. This means that, in the first four months of this year, Herr Hildebrand had gobbled up CHF58.9 billion of a money nobody else much wanted to own – on top of which we have to add what is likely to be a sizeable sum of flight capital ‘absorbed’ in the first turbulent weeks of May (€9.5 billion on Wednesday morning alone, according to market rumour).

Making a simple estimate that the overall intervention this month has at least matched that undertaken in April (a decidedly conservative guess), the Bank will have amassed around CHF80 billion so far this year, a total of which the mighty PBoC would not be ashamed and one, even more remarkably, equivalent to around 45% of the Confederation’s entire private national income for the period.

Not only has the SNB therefore seriously diluted its existing citizen-shareholders’ equity stake in their own country (think about it), it has gone some good way into turning the Swissy into the Hong Kong Dollar of Europe, since fast approaching 70% of the asset side of its balance sheet is currently being held in the form of forex (160% of the monetary base, 38% of M1), putting the once-proud Swissy well on track to degenerating to mere currency board status.

With Hildebrand maintaining the stance in the Swiss press that reserves were, if anything, too low, before his shopping spree – and with the ECB’s ability to create extra Euros being both essentially limitless and in inverse proportion to its Northern members’ desire to hold them – the Swiss are in danger of selling out their remaining economic and monetary independence in the name of a mercantilist desire to buffer their admittedly important exporters from the malfeasance of their neighbours’ governments.

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2010/05/21/239446/the-swiss-franc-defence-cost-a-billion-a-day-in-april/

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:44 | 366244 sheeple
sheeple's picture

I was advised that rejecting his nomination would cause markets to nose dive, which would hurt retirees and families saving for their future.  I am not enthusiastic in my support

 

What she really mean: I was advised that ... , which would hurt my retirement and my stock portfolio ... 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:44 | 366413 earnyermoney
earnyermoney's picture

Bingo.

 

The bailout was to preserve the wealth of the political class.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:49 | 366262 belogical
belogical's picture

So why do we have elections if the politicians are taking their cues from the Market?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:54 | 366282 hidingfromhelis
hidingfromhelis's picture

Translation & synopsis of Sen. Mikulski's text: 

I don't have an effin' clue what I'm talking about, so I'm just going to parrot what my handlers told me to say.  Sure hope my meaningless answer satisfies you, but I really don't give a crap if it doesn't.  Have a nice day.

"I voted to confirm Mr. Bernanke because he is not a man of ideology."  WTF?

"But I think Mr. Bernanke understands the job that he still has to do."  I don't think that she fully understands the truth of what she's saying here.

 

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:02 | 366311 AllYourBaseAreB...
AllYourBaseAreBelongToUs's picture

Isn't 'not a man of ideology' akin to 'she's ugly and stupid, but has a heart of gold'?

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 00:28 | 367246 ArmchairRevolut...
ArmchairRevolutionary's picture

I am not a man of ideology, because I have a brain.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:55 | 366284 johnmilan
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:31 | 367097 Mr Creosote
Mr Creosote's picture

Isn't Max really Norm MacDonald in a vest?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:58 | 366301 lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

Dear (fill in blank):

Thank you for getting in touch with me about (fill in blank)'s (fill in blank) to (fill in blank). In diners and dry cleaners, warehouses and whorehouses, from one star-spangled shining sea to the other, Americans are anxious, angry and alliterative about (fill in blank). I support (fill in blank) because (fill in blank).

If you have any more questions, and if you contact my office again, and I will definitely (fill in) your (blank).

Sincerely,

(fill in blank)

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:53 | 366435 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

"and I will definitely (fill in) your (blank)."

ow... my stomach hurts from laughing so hard.

++

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:01 | 366307 ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

On along enough timeline everything is related...

To that end: http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/05/house-committee-on-ho...

Mr. Beck - NO NOT THAT ONE - ought not look too hard less he discover that the Treserve is aiding and abetting (financial) terrorism which could lead to Timmah and HeloBen - if Senator Lieberman had his way - losing their US Citizenship.  Oh my...maybe we ought not close Gitmo.

Pete

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:02 | 366310 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

90% of this country is going to turn into Detroit 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:40 | 366405 earnyermoney
earnyermoney's picture

The other 10% rings D.C. and Manhatten

Sat, 05/22/2010 - 11:11 | 367583 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

Beirut, Sariavo, Mogadishu are more likely comparisons.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:03 | 366316 gravenewworld
gravenewworld's picture

Dear Friend:

Thank you for contacting me regarding the Federal Reserve System. I welcome your thoughts and comments.

Since its inception in 1913, the Federal Reserve System has served an important role in our financial system. Recently, to address our nation’s current economic downturn, the Federal Reserve system has taken extraordinary and unprecedented actions that have resulted in a dramatic expansion of its balance sheet. As a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, which has oversight of our nation’s financial system, I have expressed my concerns to Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke about the risks of these actions, especially with regard to potential future inflation. I am troubled by the lack of transparency and by news of the many newly created Federal Reserve System programs.

I am a co-sponsor of S. 604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act of 2009. Introduced by Senator Bernard Sanders (I-VT) on March 16, 2009, this important legislation would give the Government Accountability Office (GAO) authority to audit every item on the Federal Reserve's balance sheet. As a result, S. 604 would reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited and the manner in which such audits are reported.

The Federal Reserve Sunshine Act has been referred to the Banking Committee. As Congress considers S. 604 and other legislation to stabilize our financial system and improve the disclosure and accountability of financial regulatory authorities, you may be certain I will keep your views in mind.

I appreciate hearing from you, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me on any issue that is important to you.

Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:19 | 366356 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

S.604 was fine...this letter must have been sent prior to Sanders knuckling under from some sort of pressure from Dodd (i.e. his puppet masters).

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:47 | 366421 Crab Cake
Crab Cake's picture

"Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out."

- Andrew Jackson

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:55 | 366442 i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

+1776

(i'm aware he presided later...)

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:06 | 366323 jkruffin
jkruffin's picture

Here is Kay Hagan response to me,  another typical pawn who does what she is told to do and when.  I can't believe people voted for this woman, including myself.  At the time, I guess she was the lesser of two evils. These puppet Senators, who have no mind of their own, are really destroying this country.

 

     May 6, 2010

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your message regarding the confirmation of Ben Bernanke as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important nomination. I apologize for my delayed response.

On September 17, 2009, President Barack Obama nominated Ben Bernanke to serve a second four year term as the head of the Federal Reserve. His nomination was subsequently approved with bipartisan support by the members of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Chairman Bernanke was confirmed by the full Senate, again with bipartisan support, on January 28, 2010, by a vote of 70-30.

Chairman Bernanke first assumed his role as head of the Federal Reserve in February 2006 and has shown tremendous leadership during his tenure. While I certainly believe that the Federal Reserve made mistakes leading up to our recent economic crisis, Chairman Bernanke took critical steps to avert a deeper financial crisis in 2008. By cutting interest rates decisively and establishing targeted lending programs, Chairman Bernanke staved off financial panic. I believe that Chairman Bernanke is the best possible individual to head our nation's central bank during this economic recovery.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

  Sincerely,

  

  Kay R. Hagan

Please do not reply to this email. Instead, if you have further questions, please visit www.hagan.senate.gov and fill out my web form for your inquiry. Thank you.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:38 | 366401 earnyermoney
earnyermoney's picture

Thanks for posting. At least you got a response. I have written Senator Hagan on several occasions and have never received a response from her office. I'm convinced my Independant party affiliation is the reason for the hostility. It's clear that Democrats have representation but everyone else can drive into a bridge support.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:10 | 366330 HomemadeLasagna
HomemadeLasagna's picture

Harkin also voted for the "reform" bill, but issued this statement:

“I voted for this measure because it is a step in the right direction. This bill will create a strong consumer financial protection bureau that will put a stop to a whole range of predatory financial practices targeting ordinary Americans.

“I am particularly pleased that language requiring commercial banks to spin off their derivatives operations remained in the bill in its original form as reported from the Senate Agriculture Committee. This is a very important part of the bill and I hope it remains in the conference-reported bill.

“I am disappointed, however, that other amendments in line with Chairman Lincoln’s provision were not included. In particular, Senator Cantwell’s proposal to reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act was not even considered. I was one of eight senators to vote against financial deregulation in 1999 that did away with Glass-Steagall. Reconsidering this issue had a place in this debate. Also, Senators Brown and Kaufman offered an amendment that would have dramatically reduced the size of the largest financial institutions. Unfortunately, the amendment was defeated.

“The problem in the financial sector, as with so many areas of our economy, is that the ground rules and oversight have been lax. Too many in the financial industry put profits ahead of people. As a direct consequence, tens of millions of ordinary Americans have lost their jobs, their homes, and, their livelihoods. This legislation will help restore some balance to our financial sector.”

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:10 | 366331 The Alarmist
The Alarmist's picture

And they tell us the Al Quaeda is the terrorist threat.  It seems to me like we are living more in fear of a market meltdown than of the next strike on a city.

 

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:10 | 366332 jkruffin
jkruffin's picture

My favorite is this one, where Kay Hagan openly admits that Congress knows the FED is hiding very bad stuff, and if the people found out what it was, it would tank the economy.  Hence, she cannot support S.604.   Reposting this for those who may have missed it.  She contradicts herself at least 4 times in this letter.

 

 April 29, 2010

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your message expressing support for the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

The Federal Reserve Sunshine Act (S. 604 / H.R. 1207) was introduced in the Senate on March 16, 2009, and in the House of Representatives on February 26, 2009. The Senate bill was referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House bill was referred to the Committee on Financial Services. Both bills reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the General Accountability Office (GAO) and the manner in which such audits are reported.

Under the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (PL 95-320), the GAO has the authority to conduct financial and performance audits of the Board of Governors, and the Federal Reserve banks and branches. However, such audits are limited, as the law stipulates that monetary policy operations, foreign transactions, and the Federal Open Market Committee operations are excluded from the scope of the GAO audits. The Federal Reserve Sunshine Act seeks to expand the GAO's authority by removing these limitations.

As the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act is currently written, I am opposed to the legislation. Under common usage of the term audit -- an examination of accounts and records -- there is already a 100 percent audit of the Federal Reserve. Furthermore, Congress already reviews semi-annual reports on monetary policy submitted by the Board of Governors as required under the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act (PL 95-523).

When Congress passed the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act in 1978, the legislation attempted to balance the need for public accountability of the Federal Reserve with the need to insulate the Reserve's monetary policy function from political pressures. I believe this balance must be maintained going forward.

The formulation of monetary policy is a decision-making process that involves information gathering from a host of foreign governments and central banks. The information provided from those exchanges is critical and extremely sensitive. The immediate and broad disclosure that S. 604 would require could disrupt the financial markets, and jeopardize our country's international finance relationships. Ultimately, it would be taxpayers who would bear the brunt of any losses resulting from policies caused by untimely disclosure of sensitive information. Because of this, I do not believe the benefits of legislation like the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act outweigh the costs.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

  Sincerely,

  

  Kay R. Hagan

Please do not reply to this email. Instead, if you have further questions, please visit www.hagan.senate.gov and fill out my web form for your inquiry. Thank you.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:22 | 366366 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

"Please do not ask what is in the sausages. What you don't know won't hurt you...trust me."

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:36 | 367101 Mr Creosote
Mr Creosote's picture

The immediate and broad disclosure that S. 604 would require could disrupt the financial markets, and jeopardize our country's international finance relationships. Ultimately, it would be taxpayers who would bear the brunt of any losses resulting from policies caused by untimely disclosure of sensitive information.

Hasn't this already happened?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:11 | 366334 Steaming_Wookie_Doo
Steaming_Wookie_Doo's picture

"I was advised that rejecting his nomination would cause markets to nose dive, which would hurt retirees and families saving for their future.  I am not enthusiastic in my support."

And yet, this (assumably) college educated woman did not realize that:

1. By that remark she is in a 'hostage' situation

2. By rewarding hostage taking she will ensure that this will happen again

3. That those retirees being hurt are really holding worthless assets anyway (but I know you don't want to break it to them just yet).

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:15 | 366350 crosey
crosey's picture

Fear

...of losing campaign funding

...of losing your job

...of no more beltway parties

...of having to get a real job

...of losing the adulation of your constituents

...of losing your comfort

...of facing reality

can be a very powerful, persuasive tool.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:28 | 366354 Crab Cake
Crab Cake's picture

Global Stock Rout Halts as U.S. Banks, Euro Climb on View Selloff Overdone

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awgmirRc1g8A&pos=1

Whose view is it that the selloff is overdone?

The Fed cartel of private banksters, and world wide CB conglomerate I presume?

Drawing a line in the sand are they?

What!? The land of the free!?  Whoever told you that is your enemy!

Know Your Enemy - RATM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4smim2MNvF8

Compromise, conformity, assimilation, submission
Ignorance, hypocrisy, brutality, the elite
All of which are American dreams
All of which are American dreams
All of which are American dreams
All of which are American dreams
All of which are American dreams
All of which are American dreams
All of which are American dreams
All of which are American dreams

A woman was shot by two police officers late Thursday in south Yuba City after she approached them with a shotgun and refused to put down her weapon, according to a department press release.

http://www.appeal-democrat.com/news/family-95100-city-woman.html

So remember kiddos, if you are going to answer the door armed when it's a cop doing the knocking, and you aren't prepared to set down the firearm; go ahead and pull the trigger.

Blaze Of Glory - Bon Jovi (Edit: Do not watch this video, just listen :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upenR6n7xWY

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:20 | 366360 SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

Where does one find how a particular congressperson/senator voted on various issues?

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:24 | 366370 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Dont want to sound racist, but that's typical.

 

One is a politician passing the bucket. Knows her position wont make her popular.

Prefers to launch a rumour on how she was coerced into a decision (ridiculous, how strange the phrasing "I was advised" is), the other is a guy who perfectly knew Bernanke would collect a majority and was then safe to vote against him in order to sell his 'tough' position to his clients, huh, his voters.

Did Bernanke practise rowing when he was young? This guy has such a large back to collect all this non sense.

Fri, 05/21/2010 - 15:27 | 366373 Bitch Tits
Bitch Tits's picture

Puppet Senators with reams of form letters and overpaid staffers. I guarantee you Ms. Hagan never even saw it.

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!