This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Fed's Total 2-10 Year UST Monetization Over Next 12 Months: $340 Billion

Tyler Durden's picture




 

BofA's Jeffrey Rosenberg provides the breakdown of the total amount of securities that roll off (MBS, Agency and USTs) over the next 12 months: the total is $340 billion, including the $230 billion (and possibly more) in MBS. Alas, this means that on a straight line monthly basis (and the finally outcome will likely be far more jagged), there will be on average just under $30 billion a month in incremental 2-10 Year Treasury Purchases. As Joseph Abate said earlier, this is not nearly enough to be considered a new stimulus, and at best seeks to retain the status quo. What is notable is that BofA believes today's action should have been priced into the market. Judging by the kneejerk reaction in stocks and bonds, the reality is anything but.

From Jeffrey Rosenberg:

We would distinguish between an expansion of quantitative easing – QE2 – and an extension of QE1. The latter is more likely and in our view largely factored into credit market asset prices over the past few weeks. Extending the existing QE program means reinvesting paydowns and maturities. That simply postpones the implicit tightening of monetary policy from letting these paydowns roll off. Declining Treasury rates and the higher refinanceablity of the Fed’s mortgage holdings lead to a potential of $230bn of paydowns over the next twelve months on top of the already slated nearly $60 and $50 bn of Treasury and Agency debt maturing over the same time period. Left uninvested, that total amounts to $340bn, or nearly 20% of the portfolio purchases.

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:34 | 513352 assumptionblindness
assumptionblindness's picture

Thank you, FASB 157!  We have money to burn, bitchez!!!!

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:36 | 513358 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Looks like the Fed is cutting the diminishing supply of Viagra into quarters to keep the er....... eruptions down to a minimum. Of course, everything changes the day after the elections. Of course.

I hope the Fed's ole lady is too disappointed in the (lack of) results for the next few months.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:40 | 513370 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

If your raging inflation continues for more than four quarters, please consult a physician. 

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:46 | 513391 Mitchman
Mitchman's picture

Great avatar!

Wed, 08/11/2010 - 09:47 | 515011 EB
EB's picture

Fed mentioned nothing about maturing securities, only reinvesting principal payments from Agency and Agency MBS.  The Fed already replaces Treas & Agency by purchasing directly from the issuer at auction, pursuant to the Reserve Act.  So, you can wipe all but $6.0 billion (actual principal payments over the next year) from that $46.9 billion in Agencies and get rid of the $62.4 billion in Treas entirely.  Based on current interest rates, MBS principal payments would be $170.9 billion over the next year, so my total is $176.9 or half Rosenberg's.  Not much, though I do look forward to reading the word POMO again.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:36 | 513364 jvota
jvota's picture

I know what you're thinking. "Did we fire six shots or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement we kind of lost track ourselves. But being as this is the Federal Reserve, the most powerful central bank in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

Nope.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:14 | 513469 william the bastard
william the bastard's picture

Actually 5 because the default ratio underlying the average MBS is more like 1/6.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:34 | 513515 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Out of bullets... it's time to throw the gun.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 21:01 | 514192 Tahoe
Tahoe's picture

a great line from a great actor in a great movie - and your adaption for the circumstances gave me a big ole fashion cheek ta cheek smile ..... thanks!

Wed, 08/11/2010 - 00:15 | 514519 tom a taxpayer
tom a taxpayer's picture

Using the BLS birth-death mathematical model, I figure your five shots is actually 11.5 shots. So, Dirty Harry, I ain't afraid of you. I'm walking straight to you now. I'm gonna grab your gun and pistol whip you til you cry "Momma". [Fade to black]

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:39 | 513365 Citizen of an I...
Citizen of an IKEA World's picture

So the shit sandwich is something like 70% bigger than originally thought?

Swell.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:16 | 513473 John Self
John Self's picture

There are brown shoots [sic] breaking out all over.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:42 | 513376 kaiten
kaiten's picture

Idiocy up - dollar down.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:44 | 513386 Mitchman
Mitchman's picture

Maybe I'm reading the charts wrong, but the dollar is up against every currency on the board:

http://netdania.com/products/live-streaming-currency-rates-foreign-exchange/real-time-quotes/QuoteList.aspx

The masters of manipulation?

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:56 | 513417 kaiten
kaiten's picture

in long term, dude

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:42 | 513381 papaswamp
papaswamp's picture

Can't wait to hear China's statement...much less their reaction.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:44 | 513384 Catullus
Catullus's picture

So oblama and the decepticons can promote the agency refis and that will allow the fed to purchase more treasuries from the banks? It's cool. Everyone can get paid in this circle jerk.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:45 | 513385 101 years and c...
101 years and counting's picture

all the latest stimulus, now QE....does nothing but maintain the status quo.  it does nothing to boost sales, jobs, etc..

instead of kicking the can to 2011, they've kicked it to tomorrow.

LMAO!

 

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:58 | 513422 Rogerwilco
Rogerwilco's picture

Exactly, this isn't QE2 or QELite, it's a squirrel fart in a hurricane.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:44 | 513388 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

I suppose they can pay themselves interest as well.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:04 | 513443 flacon
flacon's picture

And taxes. 

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:47 | 513394 jesusonline
jesusonline's picture

I don't quite get it, is it 340 bln like BofA says in this chart or is it 200 bln $?

In March, Brian Sack, Manager of the Open Market Desk, indicated that this shrinkage would be in the neighborhood of $200bn from that time through the end of 2011 (roughly a 21-month period, so just short of $10bn per month)

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:49 | 513398 Bankster T Cubed
Bankster T Cubed's picture

"priced into the market"   hahahahahaha!

as if the markets are priced by investors and not "THE BOT"

gimme a break

everything is exactly where the globalist bankster crooks want it all to be

stocks, yield curve, commodities, everything

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:52 | 513403 aheady
aheady's picture

Hell yes.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:08 | 513441 George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Had a good chuckle at that idiotic phrase as well. 

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:56 | 513401 EllisWyattOTC
EllisWyattOTC's picture

Unlike Atlantis... We Will Drown In a Ocean of Monetary Base...

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:51 | 513405 LePetomane
LePetomane's picture

Extra ZIRPy

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 15:57 | 513424 rubearish10
rubearish10's picture

Ummmm, w/ MBS isn't there an issue with P/L due to toxicity?? In other words, the MBS's were mispriced and no paydown due to defaults etc... Aren't these losers for the FED P/L which remains on the BS?

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 17:21 | 513652 chinaguy
chinaguy's picture

Humm, yes., seems they are playing both sides. When these were bought - at parity - that money went into the system - at parity. When they are exchanged for treasuries - at parity - that money Will go into the system - at parity.

So...to close out the accounts the Fed has to create money out of thin air to cover the losses...and I might be wrong here...but the Fed does not have the authority to print out of thin air - exchange FRNs for treasuries,yes, but not just make FRNs - out of thin air - to cover their losses. That is up to the Treasury.

Someone more versed on "legal" monetary policy please chime in. If the Fed just trades parity for parity when losses obviously occurred. I'm thinking that is (was) illegal.

 

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 18:14 | 513767 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

You think the Fed had the legal authority to bail out AIG?  Or buy shit paper from Freddie/Fannie?

What makes you think they need legal authority to do anything in this Wild West environment?

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 18:45 | 513822 chinaguy
chinaguy's picture

Requesting specific statues, not rhetoric.

Realized after I posted this it was a waste of my time. All of the folks who could answer this question left this blog 6 months ago

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 19:59 | 514038 duncecap rack
duncecap rack's picture

Any idea where they went?

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 20:23 | 514102 chinaguy
chinaguy's picture

Yeah, but I ain't saying where. This blog got a solid 6 months before the hoi polli chased the traders & analysts out. That's several more months than most blogs get & I assume that's because ZH doesn't dumb down it's commentary, but you have to do your own leg work to find the next one.

Hey, TD how about a paid site, with exactly the same concent, just a cover charge to keep the penny stinkers out?

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:01 | 513436 Brahms Third Racket
Brahms Third Racket's picture

Anyone notice that while TNX bounced slightly off 2.75 before it closed, TYX shot back up when it was announced that the FED would concentrate on 2s through 10s?  LOL.

Poor long bond. If the Fed doesn't want you, nobody does.

Buyer of last resort indeed.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:02 | 513437 ZackAttack
ZackAttack's picture

I asked this some time ago on one of Leo's threads, I believe, in the context of QE:

Does anyone have an example in all of human history where debt monetization has actually worked? I can't think of one, but I can name many, many counterexamples.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:05 | 513447 flacon
flacon's picture

Bernanke: "Ye of little faith. There's always a FIRST time for everything to work." :)

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:12 | 513460 nwskii
nwskii's picture

Exactly, he thinks the last country that did this just did it wrong Ben knows how to do it right and better than the last guy or country. Seems like communism

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:17 | 513475 surferexx
surferexx's picture

any chance that today's policy is an admission of ineffectiveness?  What are the chances that QE2 never happens?

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:42 | 513531 Dismal Scientist
Dismal Scientist's picture

Zero. Following the deaths of legends Bob Hope and Johnny Cash, the US now has no hope and no cash. Sell the USD...

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 16:59 | 513586 HEHEHE
HEHEHE's picture

I don't see how you get a sustainable stock rally off of this hit off the QE crack pipe like you did the last one.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 17:05 | 513612 Thunder Dome
Thunder Dome's picture

I just want to grow up to be, to be a Debaser...

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 17:38 | 513691 max2205
max2205's picture

I guess Ben doesn't want the Dems to keep the majority. I love the squirt gun pulled today.

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 17:45 | 513709 Hunch Trader
Hunch Trader's picture

Quote from Jeffrey Rosenberg is spot on, this is not QE2.0 at all. Stocks are a sell unless you think we're at an equilibrium now.

Did Fed just give their seal of approval for Double Dip? They probably cannot launch QE2.0 without a very good reason. DD would be one.



Tue, 08/10/2010 - 20:28 | 514114 duncecap rack
duncecap rack's picture

My gut feeling is that Bernanke doesn't want to launch any sort of QE 2. I think he would like the politicians to get moving with some sort of meaningful action. I got high for the first time in many years on the week end and suddenly thought about Bernanke in a totaly different light. I always read zero hedge for my economic news so I am used to thinking about him as the enemy but when I thought back about the things he has said recently I am not so sure. He recently has asked (in his polite way) that the government do something meaningful about the defecit and to do something about unemployment. I think he has been trying to speak truth to power.I think he will do his best to keep the economy functional but I do not think he wishes to take action.

I think if the markets are being gamed to cause QE2 it is more likely the banks are freelancing. That's just my opionion and it shouldn't take too long to get junked out for it.

Wed, 08/11/2010 - 03:34 | 514681 susiesss
susiesss's picture

hi?can you send the original report to susiesss910@gmail.com thanks a lot !

Wed, 08/11/2010 - 03:43 | 514684 TraderTimm
TraderTimm's picture

Pack your parachutes for tomorrow. So much red out there, I need to make some cherry koolaid.

Pac-man is about to fall down the tempest-chasm and de-rez in a poof of pixels.

Fri, 02/25/2011 - 07:34 | 996415 george22
george22's picture

Fed mentioned nothing about maturing securities, only reinvesting principal payments from Agency and Agency MBS. The Fed already replaces Treas & Agency by purchasing directly from the issuer at auction, pursuant to the Reserve Act. So, you can wipe all but $6.0 billion (actual principal payments over the next year) from that $46.9 billion in Agencies and get rid of the $62.4 billion in Treas entirely. Based on current interest rates, MBS principal payments would be $170.9 billion over the next year, so my total is $176.9 or half Rosenberg's. Not much, though I do look forward to reading the word POMO again.
cheap christian audigier watch|642-145|000-153|pandora

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!