FHFA Makes a Big Bet

Bruce Krasting's picture

There were several releases from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) this past week including:

-A speech by acting FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco.
-A report on the efforts by Fannie and Freddie regarding restructuring exiting mortgages.

First consider this from the restructuring report:

Trial loan modifications under HAMP more than tripled from June to August, from 66,200 to 202,200.

addition, the Agencies restructured 58,000 outside of HAMP. The average
loan is close to $200,000. That means that the GSE’s have restructured
$52 billion in loans. $39 billion of that was in the three months
ending in August. Their rate for September must have been close to $20
billion. The total is north of $70 billion. As a percentage of their
total book this comes to 1.25%, or 5+% annually.

From the speech this slide:

numerous occasions the FHFA has used this type of graph to demonstrate
how well they are doing. They point to the relatively low default rate
they are experiencing compared to the private sector and other
government lenders. DeMarco said in his speech:

Mae and Freddie Mac have a combined 57 percent share of mortgages
Outstanding, that accounts for only 25 percent of serious delinquencies.

FHFA is blowing smoke at us. Their default rate looks good by
comparison because they are not recognizing losses. They are just
rolling them forward. They have done $70billion already and now that
they have it figured out they will continue the process. How much of
the 5% annualized rate should go on top of their stated numbers? Over
time, more than half . The Agency default rate is understated in the
report as a result.

Most of the restructured loans are from
seriously delinquent borrowers. Those in payment default by 90 days.
When these loans are restructured they go off of the Delinquent list.
Therefore the more the Agencies restructure, the lower their
delinquency rate looks. Mr. DeMarco said this about his ability to
restructure dead mortgages:

HARP, these barriers have been addressed. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
today will refinance mortgages they currently hold, even up to a
current loan-to-value of 125 percent.

The ‘barriers’ he
is referring to are prudent lending standards. Recent data shows that
one half of these loans will re-default.If real estate prices do not
make a significant recovery, the very high re-default rate will

Also from the speech this slide on the balance sheets of the Agencies:

funded portfolio at the Agencies has been static. This is because there
are limits on the size of the portfolio. These were mandated as a
result of the conservatorship. But there are no limits on the amount of
MBS that is guaranteed. They are using that loophole to maximum
advantage. Who owns this guaranteed MBS? Increasing it is the Federal
Reserve through their non-stop POMO buys. The Fed is mixing its QE
monetary policy objectives with support for bad credits. Agency MBS is
not money good at par unless Treasury funds the losses. Agency MBS is
still not full faith and credit paper. With the absence of a full
guaranty the Fed would normally have to haircut this paper. The Fed
typically requires ‘two ways out’. (1) The promise to pay by the
borrower and (2) the collateral that backs up that promise. As of today
there is only one certain way out of this MBS. And that is not worth par.

The Fed's POMO buys have facilitated HAMP. That is well outside of traditional monetary policy.

From the speech, a comment by Mr. DeMarco:

is an opportunity today to help many more homeowners strengthen their
own balance sheets by taking advantage of the HARP program.

can lending someone 125% of the value of their home improve a balance
sheet? At best it improves cash flow for the borrower for a short
period of time. This is at the expense of a larger principal
obligation. Underwater borrowers are bad credits. Rolling over bad
loans is a bet on the come. The FHFA is playing at the big casino on
the hope of a RE recovery. It isn't an even money bet.