This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Game On | Deutsche Bank, Akerman Sentertfitt Sues Lynn Szymoniak's Son With No Financial Interest In Her Case
Again, for those of you that do not know the term, “It’s On Like Donkey Kong” I provide the definition below…
“A
phrase to denote that it’s time to throw down or compete at a high
level; something is about to go down. The use of the comical video game
character Donkey Kong provides comic relief but the phrase itself has
greater or more significance than simply its on.”
Okay, now they have gone too far. And sorry, this is absolutely BULLSHIT.
Look,
I get it. The intimidation, the threats, the indictments, the lawsuits,
the lies, but now you people want to mess with someone who has NOTHING
to do with what you fraudsters created in the first place.
This is a kids life you are trying to destroy. Have you no shame?
This
is ABSOLUTELY unacceptable and now you, yes Akerman Sentertfitt, are in
our sites... We will track your every move on this and expose it to the
public as best we can.
I already monitor your ip addresses, your
visits to this site from inside your offices, I even have a contact on
the "inside" of your firm who is DISGUSTED on how you people operate.
They love to talk... We even know things about your firm that you
probably do not know.
You remember how Stern went down? Well...
See you in hell...
From the Huffington Post...
Deutsche Bank Sues Foreclosure Fraud Expert's Son With No Financial Interest In Her Case
After
she'd been sued, Szymoniak said, she began investigating the
documentation on Florida foreclosures, uncovering alarming
irregularities, including signatures that were apparently forged. If so,
those signatures allowed banks to push foreclosures through overly
quickly, charge improper fees and assert improperly inflated borrower
debts.
Shortly after appearing on "60 Minutes" Szymoniak won a
major victory in her own foreclosure case. The court found that Deutsche
Bank was unable to demonstrate ownership of her mortgage, which had
originally been issued by the defunct subprime mortgage lender Option
One, and threw the case out.
Deutsche Bank was permitted to refile
their case if they could obtain proper documentation, however. And on
Friday, May 6, Szymoniak received a notification from the bank's lawyers
that she was again being sued for foreclosure.
But Deutsche Bank
wasn't just going after her. The bank was also attempting to sue her
son, Mark Cullen, who is currently pursuing a graduate degree in poetry
at the New School in New York. Cullen hasn't lived in Szymoniak's house
for seven years and is not a party to any aspect of her mortgage -- he
has no interest in either the property or the loan, and never has had
any such interest, according to Szymoniak.
"It is just absolute
harassment," Szymoniak said. "He doesn't own anything, for god's sake!
He's getting a masters in poetry. He not only doesn't have any money,
he's never going to have any money."
If you can stand it, you can check out the rest here...
And again, I apologize for the language but, FUCK YOU Akerman Sentertfitt / Deutsche Bank.
www.4closureFraud.org
Foreclosure Fraud on 60 Minutes
»
- advertisements -
Sheila Shaking up and down head Bair said they need a cleanup fund, my ass.
She supported Dodd-frank bill to give Fed a whole shit load of power. A story for another day.
They need a RTC 2 dump all assets from these insolvent banks into it. Schedule an auction for every Saturday and have an absolute sale. Get rid of these asshole asset managers and the entire mortgage cluster fucking system handlers. It’s a delay to collect debt and keep the chain of payments continuing. You want cheap affordable housing let cash buyers show you where market prices really are.
Mark to market cash sales amounts will be way lower than what Fannie, Freddie sales as they will fuck you with no money down and slam you back in their debt sales program. To get people back in affordable housing gov needs to stop intervening in housing sales.
Gov needs to prosecute the regulators in OCC and bankers for fraud that started when Bush needed a economy booster. Now they are trying to cover their tracks as public finds out how fucked they really are.
Reading this reminds why I resist the philosophy of "Survival of the Fittest".
who knew that natural selection in sapiens would mean the ascendancy of psychosociopathy. Something doesn't fit there. either darwin was wrong at least when it comes to humans, or human society is wrong(that is, anti-natural selection), or humans as a species are an evolutionary mistake, a dead end.
Any process, that in sapiens apparently leads to the selection and propagation of individuals and groups of individuals who for nothing but short term gain absolutely destroy other individuals, including the longer term viability of their own living environment; such a process, has to be a mistake.
at least if we are to take darwin seriously, because how can destroying one's own house be an evolutionary advantage? something has to give, there is something very wrong here.
440 individuals in US represent 1% of gdp.
http://www.zcommunications.org/end-of-the-wild-by-stephen-m-meyer
That's what you get when you have a system that provides bread, but without a moral basis. Not that I am advocating Theocracy; a blend of Kropotkin and Tommy Douglas would do nicely though.
INDIANAPOLIS | Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.
In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer's entry.
"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," David said. "We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."
David said a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.
The court's decision stems from a Vanderburgh County case in which police were called to investigate a husband and wife arguing outside their apartment.
When the couple went back inside their apartment, the husband told police they were not needed and blocked the doorway so they could not enter. When an officer entered anyway, the husband shoved the officer against a wall. A second officer then used a stun gun on the husband and arrested him.
Professor Ivan Bodensteiner, of Valparaiso University School of Law, said the court's decision is consistent with the idea of preventing violence.
"It's not surprising that they would say there's no right to beat the hell out of the officer," Bodensteiner said. "(The court is saying) we would rather opt on the side of saying if the police act wrongfully in entering your house your remedy is under law, to bring a civil action against the officer."
Justice Robert Rucker, a Gary native, and Justice Brent Dickson, a Hobart native, dissented from the ruling, saying the court's decision runs afoul of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
"In my view the majority sweeps with far too broad a brush by essentially telling Indiana citizens that government agents may now enter their homes illegally -- that is, without the necessity of a warrant, consent or exigent circumstances," Rucker said. "I disagree."
Rucker and Dickson suggested if the court had limited its permission for police entry to domestic violence situations they would have supported the ruling.
But Dickson said, "The wholesale abrogation of the historic right of a person to reasonably resist unlawful police entry into his dwelling is unwarranted and unnecessarily broad."
This is the second major Indiana Supreme Court ruling this week involving police entry into a home.
On Tuesday, the court said police serving a warrant may enter a home without knocking if officers decide circumstances justify it. Prior to that ruling, police serving a warrant would have to obtain a judge's permission to enter without knocking.
lie down and bend over bitchezzz. why even have the quaint old 4th? let's just take everything to civil court. probable cause? reasonable suspicion? factual predicate? pfffft.
Next time you could summarize and provide a link.
Here is a link to the Indiana Supreme Court Order
You fuck an old lady's son, like an ewe.
So, screw you Douche bank...and fuck you too.
Then when you die, we hope you fit
in the ring of hell filled with shit.
comments worth repeating. hope banks, wall street, politicians are reading this:
Deutsche Bank, Citi Bank, Bank of America, all of the rest of you to big to fail banks: you have declared war on my country and my people, you have declared war on me. It is that simple. You have fomented usury, hatred, inequity on my people and done so with a smile and a bentley. I will not do business with you. I will tell as many people as I can what you do and I will take as many people with me as I can. You can rear back like the snake you are and strike at my country and my people as much as you want, but we are going to win, and you are going to lose. This goes for all of you, in the end, you'll take your spoils to hell....like I've said before, the only way this is going to change with corrupt banks, corrupt government, corrupt judicials, is for some people to die, period........Holy fuck.
Um...
These banks no longer exist. The only thing between these banks existing and not, is time. These guys are going to zero.
Not only are their "assets" marked to fantasy. They don't even have the assets in the first place. I mean, wow, that is so far beyond incompetence. It's criminal.
Are you a shareholder in these places? You should be suiing the management right now. The executive officers should be in court having their posessions seized. Why are these people still walking the streets?
Were you dumb enough to buy MBS? You have nothing. You were sold nothing, there is no Mortgage. You've been defrauded.
Are you a supplier to one of these guys? They have no assets, people are simply going to stop paying these mortgages which don't exist. You think you are going to be paid?
But of course, you should "have confidence" in the banks. And the authorities? The regulation? The FDIC? LOL that doesn't exist either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a year or so ago when I regularly made comments such as those above I got mega-junked. Now it's par for the course to read such comments on zh and elsewhere.
That's what I call progress.
i fought banksters as my way of life,
I die broken backed, a slave to debt., my children carry the burden.
After watching this eviction video I can't decide whether to turn off my pc or throw it away.
Pacific Street Films - Foreclosure Diaries
I can't imagine being that cop evicting those people. Talk about selling your soul. Can you say police state
We are witnessing an era where "absolute power corrupts absolutely". We are minnows living in a shark tank and unless you are a big bank or powerful politician forget fairness of law. My advice to 4closure fraud, L.S. and all others who wish to stop this insanity: Go viral with this info and get others to do the same. The costs of bad publicity outweigh the costs of what the bank can recover from you and others.
The pen has never in history been mightier than the sword as it is today via the internet.
like I've said before, the only way this is going to change with corrupt banks, corrupt government, corrupt judicials, is for some people to die, period........
Everyone dies, says so up in the right hand corner.
AND STOP THAT Motherfucking AD FROM TURNING ON AS SOON AS I OPEN!!!!!
But what you don't say, is several dozen have to experience a shortened lifespan thru the intervention of a vigilante.
I don't see anyone among our most supposedly aggressive revolutionaries----the men with guns that they sleep with---- taking out even one Lord Blankfeind, or Joe Csssano, or Dick Fuld in the last three years.
So it looks like they get away with it, and who knows what other ripoffs they are practicing even now.
noscript will take care of your problem
no, not that one.
NY FED Spin Machine (My Title)
What a bunch of shit.
All the idiot talks about is low cost for banks and mortgagees. What they should be talking about is protection of property rights.
But the Fed doesn't give a damn about others' property rights.
Do you realize what you just linked to? The equivalent of the Green Bay Packers playbook.
It is a clear and concise (and full of lies - the first paragraph contains a half-dozen) plan to change state laws to benefit the big Banks at the expense of property rights using the Uniform Law Commission and the American Law Institute, both, "whose mission is to clarify and update state laws".
This kind of stuff isn't supposed to happen here. Unless we stand up to this our future is bleak. This document needs to be spread far and wide. The Founding Fathers warned us this day would come.
Everyone that bought a house who is no longer in that house having lost it (or given it back) in foreclosure has a nightmare story to tell about a bank (s). There are no organs of government that are looking out for us either individually or collectively no matter what you might think or how the shitheads in DC like to crow about consumer financial protection.
In my case I needed to move and could not sell after my house dropped in value to about half the mortgage principal balance. So I packed and moved, cleaned it like it was a rental, and mailed the keys back to the bank. That was May of 2010 and as of now it is still in my name, in Oregon I am legally responsible for the property till it is sold. The bank will never sell that house, at least not until the price they can get will exceed all past due payments, all fees and dues, as well as the principal, there is no law forcing them to sell it at auction on the courthouse steps, I can't compel sale. This means they have bought an insurance policy on the house for more than 300% what I paid for a homeowner policy, probably from a related company, and I can't get around that by buying insurance on a house I do not reside in.
I was notified months ago of a auction sale to be held but every month they cancel it, last month of the 140 foreclosures to be sold on the steps of the courthouse all but one was postponed and that one was at a reserve price nobody was interested in. In fact aside from me there was only one other person that bothered to show up.
I had read the advice on all the blogs, examined the laws and studied news stories about strategic default before deciding to leave, in all of it the bottom line was that if you do it you can clean up your credit within three years. But that three years starts once all is said and done and the house has been disposed of. I consulted an attorney and was told that my best option at this point would be to move back in and live there free till I am evicted, and carry my own insurance of course.
What this will do is have the effect of forcing me into bankruptcy to rid myself of the debts related to the mistake of buying that house. Once I file chapter 7 I can include any debts related to the house and bank even if they have not yet accrued, in other words the bank would no longer be able to stick me with all future costs associated with that address. At that point they will sell since from a legal point of view they will be responsible for the house and the costs. The larger problem for me and the wider economy is that if forced to go to bankruptcy court to extract myself from the games Chase likes to play I will also be forced by economic reality to dump all other debts at the same time. Three credit cards with about 5,000 balance between them, the car loan (and with it the car). From that point I can live quite comfortably on a smaller scale.
Do I feel bad for the bank, no, they were the ones that intentionally created this mess, it was they that started it by listing foreclosures so far below market price no one else in any neighborhood could afford to sell. In my neighborhood houses that had sold for over 200k in 2007 were selling for 129k in 2008 and banks were listing foreclosures in 2009 for half of that though they refused to sell them. No appraiser will bring in an appraisal for 130k or more when there are similar (or identical) units in the area for half that, they would lose their license, ditto RE agents. It is as if the banks got pissed about having a few foreclosures and so decided to get back at us by making sure nobody could sell but all would be taken in foreclosure.
And the really stinky part of it from you the taxpayers point of view? You put up the money for the mortgage in the first place, Chase did not put a dime of their own money into the deal, the original funding was Ginny Mae, but you did bailout Chase to the tune of tens of billions anyway, and my mortgage is guaranteed by USDA Rural Development so even if Chase did have some skin in the game the government will eventually make them whole. You put up the money, you bailed them out, and you will buy the house from them when all is said and done and they have racked up more in fraudulent fees for lawyers, court costs, insurance ans such than the house is worth. Do not blame me because I did not set the system up the way it is. It is my credit that is wrecked and I do not feel sorry for the banks or the taxpayers, when you have to move you have to move. Until they simply wipe the slate and force the banks to use proper accounting methods we will be in this mess, move over Japan because we are following right exactly in the footsteps of Tokyo and their 20 year depression.
When China tries to recapture all those delinquent loans to the "bad ol USA",
all the same tactics will be used . No doubt you and I will be named in the international lawsuit while Giethner, Paulson, Bernanke and Greenspan will be enjoying the sun in the Virgin Islands.
Bair can't even look him or the camera in the eye... Not as twitchy as the creatures in the film inside job -- but clearly knows something... Oh gee: "Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairperson Sheila Bair says she will leave the agency in July.." Hmmm... Thank you CBS!!!
she's so blase' about it. contrast that with all the petty laws enforced on the sheeple by the goons in blue.
A masters degree in poetry? Out of state? Hmmmm. It's kind of expensive going to school out of state, isn't it?
Hmmm. I wonder how he paid for it? Loans obviously, but what if, what if, Mom took out equity in her house to pay for sonny's schooling? While he was an emancipated adult?
I'm no lawyer, but if mom used a lot of money from the house equity to pay for the undergraduate and graduate degrees, then I could be convinced that there was reason to pursue the son for recapture.
I'm not saying that the law allows such tactics, but what is the difference if your parents borrowed against their home, and gave their kids the money, and then the parents went bankrupt? A bankruptcy court, i would think, would allow the recapture of the money, even if the kids spent it.
Maybe this is what's going on here.
That being said, Fuck you Deutshe Bank!
What if she used the mortgage advance to pay for the house? What if she used it to buy furniture, or a car? Can the bank get the money back from the seller of the house, the furniture, or the car? I don't think so.
They have the right to go after the borrower, period. I don't see where they have a leg to stand on.
Unless the son cosigned or they can prove some kind of criminal or fraudulent conspiracy (by the borrower not the bank).
I had the same thought. The mom took money out of the house and 'gave' it to the son. The bank wants it back, rightfully so.
Also, I do not generally agree with '4closure'. Most banks relied on electronic records of mortgages (just as the DTC does for securities) and now after the fact some municipalities are second guessing the process.
I understand the chain of title, and filings, but some of this is nonsense. It should be clear, if you are not paying your mortgage you lose the house. The banks have no problem sorting out who has rights to the mortgage.
I have a mortgage that I pay. It disgusts me that others are trying to keep a house that they are not paying for, and blaming everyone else. That is stealing.
Of course you had that same thought, not knowing what actually happened you think you can make up stories in your head! When and until you know the truth, then you can remark; until then you are a self righteous moron who may be next. Judging by your pretentious remarks you have not been paying attention at all to foreclosuregate!
(If you read the article, it says the son has no interest in either the property or the loan, and never has had any such interest)
Are you aware that the spate of quick foreclosures were mostly by the banks that no longer hold the original notes? Few have fought as hard as this person against foreclosure and you should be thanking her because she and others have exposed that many banks didn't hold the notes and were/are using fraudulent documents and what better way to launder it then to foreclose quickly to hide that evidence.
And shall we wish you to lose your job or become ill so that you are next and can eat your better than thou words? It is only nonsense until it happens to YOU?
They would have to show that the son had intent to comply with mom's plan to use the equity to pay for school in NYC. Good luck with that. If the son has no idea where the money came from they can not touch him. Play dumb, the banks do it all the time. Anyone with a loan should have a copy of their note from the closing. Take a look at it and then ask your mortgage holder to see a copy of the original note. If they don't match or the title transfers have not been made, you own the property. They play dumb throughout the process, even if they still actually hold the original note. I can't decide if it really is an evil conspiracy or if these people are really fucking retards in fancy clothes.
If the son has no idea where the money came from they can not touch him.
He's a poet so of course he has no idea where money comes from. Case closed.
Anyone who has ever had the pleasure of meeting Lynn Szymoniak knows she is about the nicest person you'll ever meet. As such she'd likely disapprove of this message.
FUCK YOU Akerman Senterfitt and FUCK YOU too Deutsche Bank. Rot in Hell you bastards.
Big Banks setting up fraud factories to fake (il)legal documents on a mass-produced scale...you need not know anymore ...they are criminal scum
Akerman Sentertfitt / Deutsche Bank must go to JAIL
Akerman Sentertfitt / Deutsche Bank must go to the GUILLOTINE.
fixed.
We have two choices over the next 200 years.
1. Stay here and eliminate them ... and we all die together
2. Leave
Sorry that might be a little too esoteric for this crowd.
I'm good with the fuck you part...It's this part that that I don't get:
I already monitor your ip addresses, your visits to this site from inside your offices, I even have a contact on the "inside" of your firm who is DISGUSTED on how you people operate. They love to talk... We even know things about your firm that you probably do not know.
Don't ever show your cards.
Well said. These people are despicable at all levels.
I know a trader in deutsche bank, brother of an ex-friend.
he's got no qualifications apart from going to the right school, knowing the right people and playing rugby.
He was in tokyo but got out of there on the first flight out of there after the earthquake.
Some say sensible, i say ...pussy.
well a pussy who plays rugby is a false nut lover who has never been a a pussy lover...
Ahem!
"are in our sites"
try sights!!
Deutsche Bank, Citi Bank, Bank of America, all of the rest of you to big to fail banks: you have declared war on my country and my people, you have declared war on me. It is that simple. You have fomented usury, hatred, inequity on my people and done so with a smile and a bentley. I will not do business with you. I will tell as many people as I can what you do and I will take as many people with me as I can. You can rear back like the snake you are and strike at my country and my people as much as you want, but we are going to win, and you are going to lose. This goes for all of you, in the end, you'll take your spoils to hell to be with your god, lucifer.
re: FUCK YOU
Glad someone finally fucking said it.
the bank just needs more money... its not their fault
Douche Bank is one giant turd.
And I won't apologize for the language.
lol. Holy fuck.
Um...
These banks no longer exist. The only thing between these banks existing and not, is time. These guys are going to zero.
Not only are their "assets" marked to fantasy. They don't even have the assets in the first place. I mean, wow, that is so far beyond incompetence. It's criminal.
Are you a shareholder in these places? You should be suiing the management right now. The executive officers should be in court having their posessions seized. Why are these people still walking the streets?
Were you dumb enough to buy MBS? You have nothing. You were sold nothing, there is no Mortgage. You've been defrauded.
Are you a supplier to one of these guys? They have no assets, people are simply going to stop paying these mortgages which don't exist. You think you are going to be paid?
But of course, you should "have confdence" in the banks. And the authorities? The regulation? The FDIC? LOL that doesn't exist either.
One day they're going to make a mistake and sue someone who not only has nothing to do with the case, but also has absolutely nothing to lose.
That's gonna be awkward.
"I apologize for the language but, FUCK YOU Akerman Sentertfitt / Deutsche Bank."
i don't apologize for the language, so FUCK YOU sentertfitt and deutsche bank.....may god try this case in heaven....in fact i will request it and i guarantee you that the results will not be pretty....what a bunch of fucking arrogant horseshit....
Amen. Two or more, just saying.
hm. so , she can't pay her mortgage, and her kid is paying 30k, or more likley BORROWING, 30k from the gov to study poetry , which really is cheap to study , ginsburg didn't pay 30k to become a great poet. he dropped out of school. (nyu i think).
i applaud zh's general tack on exposing fraudclosure. but seriously, i think they sued him to point out that this woman's kid is borrowing money he shouldn't be.
responsibility goes both ways. just because there is a HUGE ass education bubble, doesn't mean you should just jump into it sans personal responsibility. i do NOT sympathize with the wall street menality of blaming the victim. but i do recognize what kind of behaviour these parasites feed their self rationlizing bullshit on. and it is stuff like this. the drug dealer of cheap money (who are themselves addicted to that competitive game of building wealth by usury and speculation) is always going to blame the consumer/addict.
So children are responsible for their parents debts? Not.
One fucking big Hand Jobs Folks in the USA. Fraud is the law of the land and guess what the Politicians are part of the shitzzzzzzzzz too. You want to clean up this shit, hang the bankers and politicians and their families
I hope a law firm takes her case pro bono and fights DB who has paid a team of lawyers probably $500 per lawyer per hour (and that's with out the padding).
...and "Yes, Judge, we request a jury trial!"