This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Geithner: "Fed Audit Would Be Problematic For The Country"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

It is the esteemed Treasury Secretary's opinion, that anything that has to do with demystifying why the Fed is hell bent on destroying the US dollar, killing the middle class, and allowing Lloyd Blankfein to purchase Larry Ellison's yacht collection, is squarely in the "problematic for the country" camp. Never mind that more than half the country (in fact almost two-thirds) have indirectly voiced their support for HR 1207. But at least it is good to know where Geithner's allegiances lie, and even better to see how good at totally perverting facts (not just taxes) the SecTres is.

And the punchline: "The true test of the Fed is the market." Is there a way to give Mr. Geithner an economics test because it seems he might have graduated with a biz-econ degree from Devry.

 

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:38 | 47799 economessed
economessed's picture

You know what's problematic for Tim?   The truth.

 

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:50 | 47992 . . .
. . .'s picture

I don't worry about Geithner, Bernanke, and their ilk.  At some point, some point the hicks they laugh at will start lynching them.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:02 | 48015 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

independent of politics-RIGHT...

-BUT what about being independent of Goldman ?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:56 | 48085 Thurifer
Thurifer's picture

Absolutely...I mean there are some people who like to do their audits with torches and pitchforks.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 01:15 | 48475 mgarrett84
mgarrett84's picture

This scares me,  the situation has been bad and extraordinary measures have been taken for all of our well being.  This needs to be handled outside of the spotlight. 

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 06:13 | 48535 . . .
. . .'s picture

Don't be selfish.  You might want to punish Geithner and Bernanke in private.  But why should you have all the fun.  The public is entitled to share.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 13:46 | 48882 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

just poison that rat fink 

Fri, 11/20/2009 - 16:29 | 137749 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Apparently both Geithner and Bernanke earned their degree in Zimbabwe economics school.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:05 | 48097 eggy123
eggy123's picture

I really, really hope so. I'll be in line to throw of few stones at the rotting corpse of this ass-clown and his douchebag buddies.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 09:43 | 48613 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

And after that the mob will come for the jews, blacks, gays, and anyone else that the corporate media convinces them are responsible for their own short-sighted stupidity.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 11:28 | 48727 . . .
. . .'s picture

When Geithner, Kohn, Bernanke, and Paulson started lying and arguably breaking the law to give handouts to rich bondholders, they took on the risk of being punished as lawbreakers by politicians, vigilantes, or otherwise.

They arguably acted like Oliver North conducting illegal wars, and G Gordon Liddy conducting illegal campaign operations.  If that is what they did, then they need to be punished by judge, jury, and prosecutor.  If they didn't want to be tried and prosecuted, or risk vigilante justice, they should have thought about that before arguably breaking the law to give  handouts to rich bondholders.

Sun, 11/01/2009 - 17:56 | 116791 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

awesome

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:01 | 48218 albion402
albion402's picture

The degree was Fiz Head from DeVry.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:57 | 48267 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I thought he was a GSU alum.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:58 | 48268 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I thought he graduated from GSU.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 21:10 | 48276 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

This fucker is pathological. I knew somebody who made national headlines for a weird, non-violent crime back in the early 2000's who spoke just like Geithner does in this piece. Why is that relevant? That fucker was a pathological lier too! (BTW - that person remains in prison to this day)
I can guarantee you that if the interviewer was screaming these questions in Timmy's face, he'd respond the same way. "That's completely understandable...That's a logical question from the American people..." If you've ever had the opportunity to witness anyone who you absolutely KNOW is lying and watch/hear them answer questions like this, it is eerily similar.

I would love to see the slowed down, high-speed video version of this questioning and see the look(s) on Geithner's face as he's speaking. That would be priceless. Anybody recall Kato Cailin's facial expressions from the O.J. testimony when shown at slow speed/paused?

The beautiful thing about all of this is that people are waking up. They realize the wool has slowly been pulled over their eyes for decades and the Manchurian candidate has moved so quickly that it has startled them from their comfortable semi-slumber. The back-pedaled at first not really believing what they were seeing. They then tried to organize a bit and speak out in groups. Now they're starting to speak up on their own and let everybody know how they feel. That number is growing and growing. Probably in some sort of relation to the increasing gun sales across the country. As other commenters have mentioned, it is an odd feeling to watch the pre-revolution organize.
Many of us, being logical, rational and relatively up-standing individuals are looking forward and planning on how we can contribute to stop this mess. 2010 is the next stop for most of us. We think that by casting our vote in a different direction, we can stem the effects that all that has been initiated. From there, we think 2012 will be the time to wipe the slate clean and 'start fresh'.

Problem is...that's all playing by the rules.

Who's playing by the rules in Washington? Wall St?

I hate to say it folks, but my gut tells me things are going to get ugly. This administration will do all it can to try and move as quickly as possible to get their way. What happens the next time they act counter to what the American people want (i.e: Healthcare)? When that happens, things could very quickly spiral downward and out of control. We'll rapidly discover what it felt like during the previous darkest times in our worlds history.

It is the very last thing I want. I like living in the Matrix! I hope the answer is that we act decisively in 2010 and 2012 and gain some sense of 'normalcy' again. I just fear it's not going to be that simple and/or easy. I fear the 'Tree of Liberty' will be needing to be refreshed...

The fucked up thing is that I really don't think I'm crazy! If things do go down bad, believe me, I, my family, my acquaintances and relatives are prepared. Just some good old fashioned CYA. I hope you're all doing the same.

Time to go watch Red Dawn...

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 22:40 | 48361 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

My wife was friends with a pathological liar until the lies were mentioned and confronted. I've never seen anyone fight so hard to maintain their false reality. It's always someone else's fault and they will never admit or apologize for being wrong. To expose the fantasy they live in is to destroy their world and they will lie, cheat, steal to maintain it -- and vindicate and convince themselves that it's the right thing to do.

I don't know if Geithner is that way, but God help us if ANYONE in power is.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 02:54 | 48514 ED
ED's picture

My God man! It's prerequisite!

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 07:39 | 48549 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The problem with your 2010 and 2012 thesis is that there is nobody to vote for. A viable third party would be the only solution, but the power brokers in both currently bought and paid for parties won't allow that.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 04:39 | 48524 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Apocalypse Now-

They just need a new slogan, and perhaps Vegas is appropriate:

What happens in the Fed, stays in the Fed.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:38 | 47800 B_Movie
B_Movie's picture
Giethner ~ I too am captured do not look at me for change.
Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:38 | 47801 Joanito
Joanito's picture

Why you hatin' on Devry like that? 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:40 | 47804 Rex Havoc
Rex Havoc's picture

I believe he went to ITT Technical Institute, but who cares.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:34 | 47887 fandoo (not verified)
fandoo's picture

he issue is: When will file the second coming bankruptcy petition? Now that no lenders dare to loan

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:41 | 47806 Pickdog
Pickdog's picture

This POS will be strung up along with the rest.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:42 | 47807 TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

Poltical independence. Poltical independence. Poltical independence. Poltical independence. Poltical independence.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:29 | 47935 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Appointed by the President. Confirmed by Congress.
Appointed by the President. Confirmed by Congress.
Appointed by the President. Confirmed by Congress.
Appointed by the President. Confirmed by Congress.
Appointed by the President. Confirmed by Congress.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:42 | 47809 BuffaloBull
BuffaloBull's picture

Off Topic:

Zero Hedge has one the First Ammendment award for best blog.....

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:06 | 47863 bchbum
bchbum's picture

One?  wtf?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:24 | 47924 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

ROTFLMAO; i cant stop laughing + trillion

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 06:54 | 48545 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

'Idiocracy' is in effect.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:42 | 47810 Cindy_Dies_In_T...
Cindy_Dies_In_The_End's picture

He didn't mean to say that out loud. He was actually thinking about if HE ever got audited more extensively than previously. That might be problematic.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:46 | 47819 Rex Havoc
Rex Havoc's picture

He was thinking that a Fed audit would be problematic for the Fed!

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:32 | 47943 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Oh my Gawd... So you are accusing the private FED of not paying its corporate taxes either?? Oh... My... Gawd...

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:33 | 48190 agrotera
agrotera's picture

oh...my...gawd, love you anony!

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:43 | 47811 Thoreau
Thoreau's picture

Geithner looks kinda Vulcan in that first frame... until he opens his mind via his mouth, that is.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:45 | 47979 cocoablini
cocoablini's picture

Acutally, he looks more like a Romulan. A conniving, pointy-eared, belligerant troll.

Who wants to bet that the Admin will pull exec. privilege on this and save Goldman,Geithner and Bernanke

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 02:23 | 48509 Spartacus
Spartacus's picture

hahahahahaha, i LOVED THIS POST.

I agree, exec. priviledge will save them.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 02:31 | 48511 agrotera
agrotera's picture

Who can save anyone if they are being accused of treason? 

Paulson/Bernake/Geithner all claim that what they did was to protect our republic, but, clearly, conflicts of interest were acted upon, and companies were given money verses allowing them to fail, and this appears to be the definition of breech of their fiduciary obligation to the people of the United States. 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:44 | 47813 D.O.D.
D.O.D.'s picture

"You want to keep politics out of monetary policy", that's odd, with Goldman donating $999,000 to the Obama campaign, with the bait and switch played on congress by former Treasury secretary, with Tim being Bernankes "man in the house", how is politics NOT in monetary policy?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:45 | 47816 Humble Gentleman
Humble Gentleman's picture

He clearly dodged the tax fraud question by scapegoating congress' consideration of his appointment -- what a slimeball. Also, his extolling of Goldmanites is clearly nepotistic, which means his reference to them as "statesmen" is inherently a whole lot of nonsense. It's time to purge the system of the corrupt and restore the constitution!

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 03:08 | 48518 ED
ED's picture

With repect to leaving IR too low - "everybody did it".

And yes - complete f****** messes are "complicated" Tim

Tools? What kinda tool you lookin for now, boy? Would something nuclear satisfy your puerile sadistic little urges?

BOLLOCKS!

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:45 | 47817 MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

Are you sure he is actually graduated?  A Devry dropout more likely...

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:41 | 47965 Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Yeah but he also had all those credits from the University of Phoenix though.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:45 | 47818 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Geithner: "Fed Audit Would Be Problematic For The Country CLUBERS at GS's Pitch and Putt"

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:46 | 47820 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

This moron does not represent the American people but only Wall St. bankers and in particular Goldman Sachs! He needs to be run out office by the public as soon as possible!! Stop the insanity!!!

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:42 | 48067 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Hopefully by this time next year, the lynchings will be in full swing. I still can't believe that I'm witnessing pre - revolutionary conditions being built in this country.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:59 | 48090 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Not likely. He's still there. Evidently, the weakness of The American public has been exposed. Just look at the astroturf protests at the town hall meetings regarding health care.

Yes, corporations paid them to protest at the meetings and the morons don't even realize it.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:46 | 47821 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

This interview would have been better if conducted in a room with 200 Chinese students punctuating some of Mr. Geithner's more salient points with outbursts of laughter.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:21 | 47915 bonddude
bonddude's picture

Oh, that's good. That WAS hilarious.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:32 | 48189 Joe Sixpack
Joe Sixpack's picture

Someone should obtain the video and add a laugh track.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:47 | 47822 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

I bet they would suck all the liquidity from the system and crash the world if HR 1207 gets enacted. Look at the issue of draining 550 billion in TWO HOURS in Sep. '08. I promise you they WILL do it again do save their own skin; and POTUS will call them back to sort out the mess. This is a dangerous game being played. Although a little pain ( rampant 2 yr depression and possibly war ) is , in my book, a good price to pay if we want to see FED audited and finally abolished.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:52 | 47837 Steak
Steak's picture

Speaking of war, how about Russian built missiles for India to sink Chinese built boats for Pakistan:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrahMos

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22P

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:59 | 47847 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

ditto; im actually extremely worried about that; there is a silent war going on in Pakistan; and remember both of those countries are crazy enough to go ape-shit insane with nukes and blow a new asshole on the face of the Earth. Also, there is a possibility that the Taliban's nuke one of the major US cities in retaliation. Its pretty wild there and i don't see any exit strategy being structured to bring, if not peace, then a treaty to the region. And there is the question of Israels ultimatum when it comes to Iran. If only one bullet flies there; Russia will nuke Israel out of existence via proxies ( Lebanon, Syria ).

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:13 | 47860 Steak
Steak's picture

Nukes are where it would end, but conventional means are where it would start.  That BrahMos is the among the first cruise missiles in the world with a ramjet.  It's enough to give the Indians balls of steel since nothing in Pakistan's arsenal could stop it.  As the article notes the Indians are testing this missile specifically to hit small targets in dense urban areas. 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:28 | 47916 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

you are correct; the type of warfare would be a mix of urban guerrilla/hard terrain/old style strategic ( something like a mix of Baghdad, Afghanistan ). And I'm not so much worried about Ind/Pak conflict as I'm worried about Israelis; they are using the same bullshit tactics like G.Bush in 02 when preparations for Iraq INVASION were underway. That's the hot spot of the globe IMHO.

 

EDIT: nice to see you I Heart Goldies; you fuckin asshole.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:32 | 47940 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Sustained high-intensity conflict is problematic.  The damned weapons are too expensive, and troops take too long to be trained to use them.  We have proven in Iraq that the world's most capable military is not capable of subduing an area the size of Texas when a large portion of the population doesn't want them there and has access to small arms and explosives.

Massed troop concentrations are little more than targets.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:45 | 47978 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

i usually agree with you; but not this time; it is not a question of incapability; but deliberate prolongation; they are waiting for Afghanistan to be secured completely. If you know someone from the military or from the intelligence community ask them why was the war in Iraq prolonged for so long, and why is Afghanistan probably, the most important geo-political location on the face of the planet Earth. I don't feel comfortable to write about that here; but the reasons are; lets say; interesting. Oh, and the war with Iran also fits perfectly in the picture painted above.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:51 | 47994 Tesla
Tesla's picture

"I don't feel comfortable to write about that here; but the reasons are; lets say; interesting."

Do you have any links to any stories along the lines of what you're discussing?

Some of us live in the middle of nowhere and don't get access to the kind of people that you do...

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:53 | 48000 . . .
. . .'s picture

Stratfor has had speculation about Afganistan, Iran, etc.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:57 | 48008 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

would be more than glad to link the articles to you; but unfortunately there are none; except for those from the people you would not trust; but REAL consequences of both the Iraq war and the conflict in Afghanistan will be fully visible in some 20-30 yrs. Sooner if Israel and Iran go to war.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:01 | 48013 . . .
. . .'s picture

I think the neocons and neolibs will be lynched before they stir up that much trouble.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:10 | 48020 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

actually, it really has nothing to do with them anymore. Oh, and the consequences should be good; actually they should secure the Empire and enslave the rest. It really could be one of the greatest strategic and tactical plays in the history of mankind; something in the tune of Alexander the Great or Caesar. And no, I'm really not kidding.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:38 | 48057 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

That is true. The only question is whether it will succeed or fail. You know what would happen should it fail. The empire will be reduced to a regional power in NA. The speculation of war against Iran appears to be only a bargaining ploy.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:47 | 48072 Gwaihir
Gwaihir's picture

If the US is involved the "great strategic plan" this will fail as soon it is supposed to be implemented. Besides sitting through the implosion of the Warzaw pact, where has ingeneous US strategy in the last decades stabilized anything? Grenada. Okay, that one, yes.

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:50 | 48075 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

you don't get it; do you; its already put in action. but ill stop here i have no intention to discuss this matter with someone who only sees 2 yrs into the future.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:08 | 48101 Gwaihir
Gwaihir's picture

LOL - how can we discuss if you don't provide any insight besides secret grand schemes and arm waiving?  Feel free to send me some of the stuff you're smoking.

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:15 | 48109 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

who said i want to discuss anything ? 

 

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:22 | 48237 Tesla
Tesla's picture

Well, if you find anything worthwhile at some point, please send it my way.

 

All the best,

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:27 | 48119 AndItsGone
AndItsGone's picture

Afghanistan is one of the two countries on Earth that border both China and Iran. It's about oil pipelines.

 

The other is, of course, Pakistan.

 

 

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 00:05 | 48427 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

and of course you can only get that pipeline to the sea via Pak or Iran! Those limey brits who drew those maps didnt foresee Iran no longer being a puppet. They were pretty smart with Kuwait though...nice to see how that 'country' is carved right out of Iraq's access to the gulf

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:47 | 47986 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I thought it was pretty funny that Bush lost two wars in two years to two countries that had no fucking armies.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 23:43 | 48414 John Self
John Self's picture

Seems to me that the U.S. defeated the states of Afghanistan and Iraq pretty easily.  Then in each case, it got bogged down in separate wars against jihadists that had relatively little connection with the countries in which they waged war.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:51 | 48077 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The fact of the matter, in Iraq, The U.S. Military is not allowed to do the job properly. Being constrained by politicians and the fantasy of civilized "Rules of War".

Of course, Bush (the military idiot) did not even bother to follow his own war plan. Seems he left a heavy division somewhere in The Med. That, and the militant neo-cons never followed the original plan laid out by The Pentagon in the 1990's. i.e. 650,000 troops.

Iraq, indeed, any war can be won. It is the measure of brutality and fear you are willing to inflict upon your enemy in targeted and coldly calculated fashion.

Of course, we should have never been there in the first place. At one time, 50% of the nation believed that it was Saddam Hussein you was REALLY responsible for 9/11.

Iraq II is not meant to be won. Oil, and destabilization, are the names of the game.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 16:02 | 49040 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

real war isn't polite like these war profiteering 'conflicts' of recent memory

you would see way more results if the shit hit the fan and we had to really turn it on

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:56 | 48006 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The Iranians have accurate medium range missile. They could destroy Dimona which would spread radiactivity over much of Israel. They have recently threatened to do just that.

That has restrained some of the more warlike Israelis, to some extent.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:07 | 47871 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Hey Cheeky,

What makes you say Russia would nuke Israel out of
its existence should Israel bombs Iran?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:40 | 47964 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

historical connotations and present geo-political strengthening and positioning; but i said via proxies not directly; think about it like the situation in Afghanistan in the 80s, but with Nukes and grade-A missiles and all other neat stuff.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 02:20 | 48507 texpat
texpat's picture

Any insight into why Iran gave up their plan on settling oil in Euros?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:22 | 48038 DaylightWastingTime
DaylightWastingTime's picture

didn't Israel have defense contracts with Georgia?

"Nor did the Russians fail to notice. "Israel armed the Georgian army," grumbled General Anatoly Nogovitsyn, deputy chief of staff of the Russian military"

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:56 | 48086 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Israel is playing all sides. Sibel Edmonds, anyone?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:28 | 47931 bonddude
bonddude's picture

Under normal circumstances people would care about wind patterns but i guess that's out the window down there.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:53 | 48080 MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

I don't know if I agree with that premise... with the Palestinians interwoven so closely into Israel's geography I think they would have to stick with the standard SCUDS... to much collateral damage... but yet again if they used the nukes then Hillary could cross that entire region off her 'to do list'... and move onto the other unsolvable problems in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.  But I do agree that something 'bad' is going to happen in that region in the next year... it is like a silent tinderbox.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:10 | 47885 Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

The supersonic cruise missiles (Brahmos, Onyx, Sunburn, etc) are probably the most important tactical innovation of the past 50 years.   I guess we will find out during the next war.    But hopefully not, and we recall these corrupt politicans before they start another war.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:07 | 48025 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I would disagre. The very accurate 'Iskander' type medium and now Chinese long range non nuclear ICBMs have changed the game considerably. There is no useful defense. The cruise missiles are much easier to destroy.

American carrier groups may be obsolete if the Chinese stuff pans out and it probably will. The Iskander is a big part of why there will be no missile shield in Poland. It is so accurate the radars and missiles involved would be gone very quickly when they decided to do so.

Any type of concentration at all is vulnerable.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 22:59 | 48384 straightershooter
straightershooter's picture

It is said sunburn will render Us navy obsolete. It will be interesting to see if that assertion is true.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 01:18 | 48478 defender
defender's picture

here is a nice write-up that agrees with you on that:

http://www.rense.com/general59/theSunburniransawesome.htm

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:30 | 47939 agrotera
agrotera's picture

Fortunately, enough people are  on to the game, that those evil tactics are not going to work for them...their gig is up. 

But, there is a power vacuum which will hamper the process of abolishing the privately held Federal Reserve, and one big part of it, is the shills of the Fed saying that without them, we will have "socialism"...so careful articulation and constantly combating this lie, is essential. 

Just like paulson and bernake used the idea that we would never want to "socialize" our banks in the fall to throw people off of the fact that these toobigtofail entities were indeed failed!!! and accomplish the world's biggest bank heist, a careful articulation of the difference between a massive unregulated/allpowerful/sacrosanct/monopolistic cartel/ and a capitalistic system with true competition is not socialism.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:04 | 47969 Frank Owen
Frank Owen's picture

`Look at the issue of draining 550 billion in TWO HOURS in Sep. '08` - I didn`t know that. thanks for mentioning it CB, and here is a link for others who might be interested:

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/how-world-almost-came-end-2pm-september-18

Can anyone shed any light on WHO it was that withdrew this money??????? This seems like a huge piece of the puzzle and I can find no answers on the net...

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:07 | 48026 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

No one ( meaning the majority ) has any clue; i would place my bet on the FED and ECB.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:23 | 48039 Frank Owen
Frank Owen's picture

I remember Max Keiser going on about Paulson being a part time arsonist, full time fire fighter..   Fire Chief I guess.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 22:25 | 48340 Marley
Marley's picture

Second that.  I use to have a link to an article questioning The Fed's actions in removing (liquidity?) but made no mention to reason, basically asking the "Why".  Then it gave the dates in question and they were close to "the day the world almost came to an end".  I'll keep looking for the link and post if I find it.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 01:25 | 48480 defender
defender's picture

That sounds like one that Karl Denninger wrote.  He was talking about the markets crashing 3 days after the liquidity was removed.  I couldn't find the link on his blog unfortunately.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:09 | 48029 . . .
. . .'s picture

Money market funds withdrawing cash they lent to banks on repos.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:00 | 48091 Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Geithner in particular is a virulent parasite tightly latched onto our world, a suppurating syncophant for the oligarchs whose feet and toenails he cleans nightly with his forked tongue just before removing his Sim suit and relaxing in his pool of primordial ooze like all good Reptilikons. They're such scum. Half the galaxy despises them.  

That's what Robert Plant says anyway - I'm too busy playing my Les Paul Custom. Now bugger off, you colonists.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:04 | 48159 walküre
walküre's picture

They will have to drain liquidity this fall.

Make no mistake, it will have to be done. The scripts have already been written and delivered to news agencies across the world. They have it on their shelves and the headlines will appear within minutes to "educate" the public about the fact that the stock market was simply overbought. Nevermind severe underlying liquidity problems which are the root of all problems.

Some idiot flagged your post as junk by the way.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:30 | 48187 Joe Sixpack
Joe Sixpack's picture

Technically, the congress and/or president could restore it by creating US currency.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 05:11 | 48528 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Hey CB. Do you remember what day that event occured?

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 05:31 | 48530 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

"On Thursday Sept 15, 2008 at roughly 11 AM"

 

Irrational runs on money market mutual funds began. For the week ending on Wednesday September 17, 2008, investors redeemed $145 billion from their money market mutual funds. On Thursday September 18, 2008, institutional money managers sought to redeem another $500 billion, but Secretary Paulson intervened directly with these managers to dissuade them from demanding redemptions. Nevertheless, investors still redeemed another $105 billion. If the federal government were not to act decisively to check this incipient panic, the results for the entire U.S. economy would be disastrous

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxz6gYIiFHc


Wed, 08/26/2009 - 06:54 | 48546 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Ok. I got a funny feeling about that event. I'm going to do some progressions on that chart and stare really hard into the abyss until the bitch blinks. It just wreaks of cover story to me.

http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2009/02/11/kanjorski-...

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:47 | 47823 pigpen
pigpen's picture

Fuck him - audit the god dam institution. Stop the distraction, red herrings and straw man arguments. I am not an idiot. Stop raping me and audit the fucking place already.

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:15 | 47899 Rex Crotch
Rex Crotch's picture

+100! what he said

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:16 | 47902 Haywood Jablowme
Haywood Jablowme's picture

A-fawkin'-men....

Is it me or is Timmy G. the kind a person you just look at and prejudge by thinking to yourself, "Yeah this guy's a sleezeball." 

Then he opens his mouth and you say, "See.  I told you."

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:26 | 47926 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

Timmay probably got t-bagged in every college party he went to.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:24 | 48115 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

he's still getting t-bagged today, only now its his Goldman buddies doing the bagging

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:45 | 48132 Uros Slokar
Uros Slokar's picture

While I certainly don't disagree with your assertion, it does rest on the highly improbably assumption that he actually got invited to parties.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:00 | 48154 Stink_Pickle
Stink_Pickle's picture

It wouldn't be the first time one of Obama's staff got t-bagged (remember Reggie Love as a Duke B-ball player passing out at a UNC Frat).

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 05:12 | 48529 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Gotta learn to juggle balls to work for the FED.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:30 | 47938 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Yes. Yes. YES.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:47 | 47824 D.O.D.
D.O.D.'s picture

I love every one of these smug little assholes I really do.  Let me rephrase Tims first answer.

Money is very complicated, and if we told you how we did it, you would all die from a brain explosion due to your lack of intellectual capacity to understand it's true meaning.  We are here to protect you, and ingnorance is bliss.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:12 | 47888 Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

haha brain explosion... These people are irritating... I say we send Tim Geithner and Kissinger back to Asia to some remote island where they can't do any damage to the world.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:05 | 48227 Anonymous
Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:06 | 48228 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

He's yours, not ours. Hasn't your lot done enough already sending us Britney Spears and CDO's? (Baywatch was okay, though.) Please wash your own dirty laundry and don't spoil our nice little island.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 15:51 | 49027 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

Brittany's back  -  where you've been>?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:47 | 47825 TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

The whole argument he makes has no merit. "We obviously can't have politicians making decisions ragarding our money." Yet he does not explain why the non-politicians are the better option.

Its sort of like the "well we can't have bums off the street run this company...but my friend Steve does a great job! Nevermind the abyss you are staring at."

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:23 | 47922 dcb
dcb's picture

You just misunderstood. we can have congress and the sanate getting in the way of profits ensured by the tax payer and socialized losses. If we did how could lloyed afford to continue his camoaign contributions

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:48 | 47987 Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

The whole argument he makes has no merit. "We obviously can't have politicians making decisions ragarding our money."

 

Yeah.  Instead "We'll have crony bankers picked by the politicians make these decisions."

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 15:58 | 49037 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

that's the point Timmy;  there is no reason it is complicated EXCEPT to rob the people. Let it blow up - it would be good to go back to a barter system and let these weasels starve for a few generations

I'l use my pool to breed catfish and use my half acre for apples, corn etc

 

 

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:39 | 48062 Quantum Noise
Quantum Noise's picture

"We obviously can't have politicians making decisions ragarding our money."

Every time Timmay comes up with this BS someone should roll up the consitution and force it up Timmay's ass until it sinks in his dumb head that monetary policy is actually Congress' business.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:50 | 48139 Uros Slokar
Uros Slokar's picture

Here here!

Although, since I'm a Canadian, my constitutional document of choice would be the Charter. But fear not, it was sufficiently long that I chose to only skim it during my time in law school, so it should do the job just fine.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:21 | 48182 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Ya. We can't have people having input into the creative process that they are a part of. That would be utterly insane and non dictatorial. Come on.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:47 | 47826 peoplesdemocrat...
peoplesdemocraticsocialistrepublicofmaryland's picture

Clearly the conversation is a misdirection play.

Just look at the photo, no volume.

If you look at sectres position, Giethner is obviously dreaming that he had been a part of those glorious times of Camalot. He is giving his best impersonation of a Kennedy (quarterback) awaiting the snap from center. No doubt talking about the good ole days when JFK and the gang would play a quick game of tag football. Knock down a few drinks and drive off a bridge.

Seems fairly obvious to me.

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:56 | 47843 Rex Havoc
Rex Havoc's picture

In the photo he was doing the disappearing coin trick to explain his point. Ahh, if only we were as smart and good looking as Tim.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:48 | 47827 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

Tammy was spotted at an Arlington, VA Safeway earlier today with a basket full of Depends

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:50 | 47828 B_Movie
B_Movie's picture

I think you know this works ... I am merelya prop in this exercise ...

So am I ... should have been

Geithner's follow up

edited.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:48 | 47829 docj
docj's picture

All the more reason to go forward with the audit, methinks.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:48 | 47830 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

God I can't stand this liar and idiot. The worst Sec. of Treasury ever!

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:34 | 47882 fandoo (not verified)
Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:53 | 48207 Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

You mean after that sniveling GS mole Hank Paulson, right? Where's that $13 billion of AIG money? Pay that back, GS. Fuckers.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:50 | 47833 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The dude is hiding the bezzle!

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:50 | 47836 Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

Incoming Geithner tantrum.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:54 | 47838 speculator
speculator's picture

What's the big deal about an audit anyway? Does anyone think it would be any more honest than any other Congressional "investigation"?

Besides, the Fed keeps us pretty well informed about how they rip us off -- it's right there on their website.

I think this campaign is a red herring. An audit won't change a thing. The public outrage would be better directed towards ending the Fed and getting rid of the legal tender laws and capital gains taxes that prevent the free circulation of gold and silver.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:54 | 47839 grey
grey's picture

He actually graduated from Hollywood Upstairs College of Finance - and funny, so did Greenspan.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:54 | 47840 TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

The "Deeply honorable men." line...

makes me want to puke.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:05 | 48022 Humble Gentleman
Humble Gentleman's picture

No doubt; sycophants generally subscribe to the school of odiousness.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 18:46 | 48131 TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

If I pat myself on the back enough times the American people will come around to liking us. I just know it.

Breaking: Ben Bernanke is awesome.

Hehe, that should do it. Now where is the confetti?

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:56 | 47841 max2205
max2205's picture

He's a Moron.  What's left to destroy after what has happened.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 19:38 | 48195 agrotera
agrotera's picture

...all of us, our lives our property and every hope we have to maintain the chance of regaining our hard won republic and liberty.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:58 | 47844 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

(timmy with a thought bubble) Upon his re-appointment, Ben bought my house. That's why.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:58 | 47845 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

"Is there a way to give Mr. Geithner an economics test because it seems he might have graduated with a biz-econ degree from Devry."

I just crushed the Level I CFA exam after taking a prep class at Devry. Excellent instructors.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:08 | 47879 pivot
pivot's picture

i think you just confirmed TD's point about devry.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 17:32 | 48051 berlinjames02
berlinjames02's picture

I think the comment about Timmy attending DeVry is insulting to DeVry...

After all, not everyone can go to Harvard. My brother went to DeVry for computers and he received a great education IMO. They taught things that were actually applicable as opposed to theory. Even his 'electives', such as finance and accounting, are highly useful regardless of the major. Upon graduation in 2001, he had several offers and was able to find a job without any problem.

On the flip side... I attended a prestigious college. I had many friends that could tell you all the theory, but no application. Many of them were also highly indebted upon graduation and were unable (or had extreme difficulty) to find work.

 

The bottom line is this: the school doesn't make the person. What the person does with the education is most important. Being from a poor area, I grew up with many smart people that chose their college based on the scholarship. I saw many similar situations in the military.

Ok... I'll get off my soapbox. I just feel bad when people arrogantly make fun of Tier 4 schools.

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 20:01 | 48220 Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

You are correct, sir.  The "tier" of the school does not matter in the long run, and not all that much in the short run either.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 15:58 | 47846 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Who invented the thumb pointing thing? Clinton? Damn...that's annoying. I think it is taught in white house tv does/don't 101.

Geithner is a dorky little puppet who sucks on Blankfein's junk.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:34 | 47949 bonddude
bonddude's picture

What's next "NO,NO,NO,NO,NO,NO !!!"-WJC ?

Gots ta be sportin' a tomata red face too.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:46 | 47982 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Clinton and/or his political handlers came up with the thumb-point. Focus groups proved that pointing a finger was perceived as aggressive, and garnered a negative reaction. The thumb-point, however, was seen a authoritative but not overly aggressive, suggesting that the speaker was strong and knowledgeable. The world of political science was giddy over this masterstroke.

Lost in all this tawdry economic news is the sad degree to which tactics-obsessed political consultants have begun to drive policy decisions in the era of the permanent campaign. Maybe after we abolish the fed we can do something about that...

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:52 | 47998 Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Plus his index finger always smelled like fish anyways.

 

(sorry.  couldn't resist)

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:00 | 47849 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

psycho-banker Timmay!

 

We trust you bro!

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:00 | 47850 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I can literally throw Geithner farther than I trust him...

...and obviously an audit is a good idea in the long run.

However, IMO, if the entire world knew tomorrow what the Fed has been up to, and we achieved complete, honest transparency, the dollar's value would get cut by 50% by lunch time...maybe worse...

We might have a rather ugly scenario, at least temporarily.

Tue, 08/25/2009 - 16:01 | 47852 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

And the punchline: "The true test of the Fed is the market." Is there a way to give Mr. Geithner an economics test because it seems he might have graduated with a biz-econ degree from Devry.

That line is the best of the day.  And that benchmark is high.  Greatest insult to a douchebag like timmy is to suggest that he is not a proper member of the "club".

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!