You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Geithner: 'We Saved the Economy, But We Kind of Lost the Public Doing It' | Me: We Can Save the Economy, But Only If We Kind of Lose Geithner

George Washington's picture




Tim Geithner claims:

We saved the economy but kind of lost the public doing it.

Simon Johnson wrote: a more accurate essay entitled:

They Saved The Big Banks But Kind Of Lost The Economy Doing It.

My take on it is pretty straightforward:

We can save the economy, but only if we kind of lose Geithner.

As I have repeatedly pointed out, Geithner and Summers are the worst possible economic leaders for our country. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

Congressman DeFazio summed it up pretty well last November:

We think it is time, maybe, that we turn our focus to Main Street ...

 

Unfortunately,
the President has an adviser from Wall Street, Larry Summers, and a
Treasury Secretary from Wall Street, Timmy Geithner, who don't like
that idea. They want to keep the TARP money either to continue to bail
out Wall Street...or to pay down the deficit. That's absurd...

 

"[Obama] is being failed by his economic team ... We may have to sacrifice just two more jobs to get millions back for Americans.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 03:40 | Link to Comment Privatus
Privatus's picture

"We saved the economy". Megalomaniac much?

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 03:34 | Link to Comment Alexandra Hamilton
Alexandra Hamilton's picture

We saved the economy but kind of lost the public doing it.

Depends on how you define 'economy'. Obviously it's not the real economy that real people depend on. That wasn't saved at all. So I guess what he really is saying

We saved Wall Street but kind of lost the public doing it (but who cares).

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 03:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 03:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 02:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 00:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 03/09/2010 - 00:03 | Link to Comment Bear
Bear's picture

Oh so you think Obama is capable of appointing someone better than Geithner? Rubbish!

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 22:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 22:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 22:33 | Link to Comment BlackBeard
BlackBeard's picture

When Timmy said "saved" he meant that he "saved" Loyd Blankfein's semen in his mouth after their AIG tryst.

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 22:22 | Link to Comment bchbum
bchbum's picture

Kinda lost the public???  Is that like 'kinda pregnant?'

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 21:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 21:03 | Link to Comment MileMarker17
MileMarker17's picture

From Carrol Quigley's 1966 opus "Tragedy and Hope"

 

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.”

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 22:03 | Link to Comment macfly
macfly's picture

The money changers have taken over the temple, and we are now living in a time of great evil.

 

The people have to throw off this mantle of debt slavery and usury before all is lost forever. A world ruled by these awful Rhodes-Fabianist bankers will be a terrible nightmare, and it is hurtling at us at break neck speed.

 

This crisis is no accident, it is all part of a great design that is playing out exactly as they want it to. By taking all our money they are sucking away both our freedom and our power. I hope that we the people will wake up and overthrow them before it is to late.

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 22:13 | Link to Comment Chumly
Chumly's picture

It won't happen - it's too late!   There will be grand "protest and revolution" of any real meaning after the fact (the big kaboom where the whole world credit system goes kaput), sometime probably inside of a few years.

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 20:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 20:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 20:14 | Link to Comment doublethink
doublethink's picture

 

We may have to sacrifice just two more jobs to get millions back for Americans.

 

Golly...I can think of a third.

 

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 20:06 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Geez, Timmy must have been reading a bunch of Andy Mellon quotes from the 30s. I'm sure that wily old dude's playbooks are all over the UST somewhere...... getting dusted off no doubt. Andy ALSO lost the public because they didn't like where he and Hoover were taking them. And the people were right and Andy was found to be dead wrong....his idea of recovery was focused on banking and Wall St. ( surprise !! ) and a wait out while they looted even more.

Mellon at least left taxpayers the National Gallery of Art and a priceless art collection to assuage his guilt.....paid for with a small fraction of the loot he accumulated. Unluckily, Andy died shortly before the grand opening.

Timmy and Barry will leave just two things .....a mountain of bad decisions and no leadership.

Every day the comparisons to GD ONE become more vivid.  

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 20:45 | Link to Comment Gromit
Gromit's picture

Mellon wanted an RTC type resolution, liquidate the foolish, build back with strong hands.

What he got was his pink slip and IRS investigation into his personal finances, after several years he was exonerated.

 

 

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 20:00 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

 I think he means they saved the Obama administration by inflating the equities market. He's still pushing the obsolete theory that the markets reflect the economy.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 00:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:47 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

I have been watching "The Tudors" on Showtime. Interesting because it was a pivatol pint in history.

The reason I bring it up is that back in the day Geithner would have been rushed through a a trial and beheaded (or burned at the stake) by now.

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:42 | Link to Comment Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

I think this is an example of preaching to the choir :)

 

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:34 | Link to Comment Catullus
Catullus's picture

I think by economy they mean the economy of those that matter to them. When they say "we're in a recovery" they mean the only "we" that matters to them.

But geithner is right. They saved the system. They know what could have happened. They know damn well a global bank run would have destroyed the government's ability to operate. They also know under a failed fiat currency is a failed state. And there's no way to regain the trust when you wipe out everyone's wealth denominated in that currency. They're not ready for the global currency yet, they need this dollar ponzi to keep going for a few more years.

It's a very interesting position to be in. Geithner and bernanke saved a system that is inherently flawed. There really were no good answers. Given that 40% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, a distruption for even 6 months (a quick depression and quick recovery a la 1920-1921) would still have been a major social distruption and major loss of quality of life for 120 million people.

Nothing that has gone on the past 3 years has given a solution that will last 40-50 years. Anyone under the age of 30 should be demanding a real alternative to this monetary regime. But not many people really understand what money even is. Or what banking is. They have no way of seeing what beyond the immidiate non-issue of the day.

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 20:00 | Link to Comment bchbum
bchbum's picture

They couldn't get elected.

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 22:06 | Link to Comment Chumly
Chumly's picture

> Orszag in 2004 with Sinai and Rubin produced a research paper on the dangers of deficit spending saying it possibly could lead to "financial disarray" - now the Administration has quadrupled what Orszag at the time felt was unsustainable deficit levels.

It ain't over yet either (the debt thing), but it will be soon (total disarray and chaos).


 

 

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:00 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

DeFazio; I shook his hand outside of a resturuant just several weekends ago. 

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 18:55 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Add in Bernanke, and we might get a real economy sometime.

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:24 | Link to Comment mynhair
mynhair's picture

Add in every moron that voted for these morons instead of writing in Mickey Mouse.

Gulag bitchez!

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 18:55 | Link to Comment Rick64
Rick64's picture

I think he meant "we saved the banks but fucked the taxpayers".

Mon, 03/08/2010 - 21:56 | Link to Comment Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

"I think he meant 'we saved the banks but fucked the taxpayers'."

And on that score I give Obama an A++ on his presidency.

He has fucked the taxpayer supremely at every turn... and his little Wall Street TBTF patsy Timmay G., too.

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 03:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 03/08/2010 - 19:02 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Did he have that stupid wide eyed, high browed look on his face?  Or was he smiling?  or was it both?  UGH!  Vampires!  All of them!

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 01:39 | Link to Comment ElvisDog
ElvisDog's picture

Oh my Lord I hate that thing Geithner does with his forehead. What is it? Surprise? Confusion? Incredulousness?

Tue, 03/09/2010 - 01:46 | Link to Comment fromthebleachers
fromthebleachers's picture

kinda looks like a Kling-on when he does that. Gives me the hee-bee-jeebies.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!