This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
George Soros: The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly Decline Of The Dollar, The Coming Global Currency And The New World Order
George Soros: The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly Decline Of The Dollar, The Coming Global Currency And The New World Order
Courtesy of Michael Snyder of Economic Collapse
In the video you are about to see, George Soros talks about "the creation of a New World Order", he discusses the need for a "managed decline" of the U.S. dollar and he talks at length of the global need for a true world currency. So just who is George Soros? Well, he is a billionaire "philanthropist" who came to be known as "the Man Who Broke the Bank of England" when he raked in a staggering one billion dollars during the 1992 "Black Wednesday" currency crisis. These days Soros is most famous for being perhaps the most "politically active" (at least openly) billionaire in the world. His Open Society Institute is in more than 60 countries and it spends approximately $600 million a year promoting the ideals that Soros wants promoted. Soros and his pet organizations have played a key role in quite a few "revolutions" around the globe over the last several decades, but these days the main goal of George Soros is to bring political change to the United States.
So exactly what is it that George Soros is trying to accomplish? Well, in a nutshell, what he wants is a Big Brother-style one world government based on extreme European-style socialism, strict population control and the radical green agenda. It would be a world where the state tightly regulates everything that we do for the greater benefit of the environment and of society as a whole.
However, Soros is not the "mastermind of the New World Order" that some have tried to make him out to be. The truth is that to those in the international banking elite, Soros is considered to be something of a "black sheep" and an "outsider". Much of what Soros is trying to accomplish lines up with the goals of the international banking elite, but what they don't like is that Soros won't stop publicly talking about a global currency and a "New World Order". Of course the international banking elite very much want a global currency and a "New World Order", but what they don't need is a "squeaky wheel" like Soros running around drawing unneeded attention to those goals.
Also, Soros does not seem to understand that both sides of the political spectrum in the United States are deeply influenced by the international banking elite. Sadly, the truth is that the same handful of elitist organizations has dominated the cabinets of every single president that we have had since World War II. If you doubt this, just check out how many members of each presidential administration over the last 40 years have belonged to either the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Group. If you have never looked into this before, you will be absolutely shocked. No matter what president we elect, it is always the exact same organizations that always dominate their cabinets.
But Soros still seems very much trapped within the left/right paradigm and he seems absolutely obsessed with destroying the Republican Party. For example, Soros spent an insane amount of money attempting to defeat George W. Bush back in 2004. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, George Soros donated $23,581,000 during that election cycle to political organizations that were trying to keep Bush from being reelected.
Soros has also been a tremendous backer of Barack Obama, although lately Soros seems a bit disenchanted with him. Through organizations such as the Center for American Progress and MoveOn.org, Soros is constantly trying to influence the state of American politics.
So what is George Soros thinking about these days? Well, in the video posted below you will see Soros discussing "an orderly decline" of the U.S. dollar, the coming global currency and the importance of the New World Order....
Did you noticed how uncomfortable Soros was when he was saying the term "New World Order"?
The truth is that he knows exactly what that phrase means. He knows that it is a phrase that he probably shouldn't say and that will get a lot of attention.
But he said it anyway.
Soros also seemed a bit uncomfortable as he discussed "an orderly decline" of the U.S. dollar.
Soros has been saying the the U.S. dollar needs to go down for quite a while now, and he speaks of the coming fall of the dollar as if it is inevitable.
The only thing that Soros seems to fear is that the "managed decline" of the dollar could "get out of hand" and could lead to global financial chaos.
Soros even had the gall to say that having the dollar be the reserve currency of the world is not in our national interest and that a move to a global currency is "a healthy, if painful, adjustment" that we are just going to have to endure for the greater good of the world economy.
But shouldn't the American people have something to say about all of this?
Perhaps the American people do not want a "managed decline" of the U.S. dollar.
Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a new "global currency".
Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a "New World Order".
But to men like George Soros, it doesn't really matter what "the little people" think. In the world that Soros lives in, those with overwhelming amounts of money and power know what is best for the rest of us, and if "the little people" don't seem to want to go along initially then public opinion can be bought if you just spend enough money.
The sad truth is that we already live in a global economy. Just go into just about any store across the United States and start picking up products to see where they were made. Very few of the things we buy are still made in the United States.
Today, labor is a global commodity. American workers must now directly compete for jobs with those making slave labor wages in China and India. The fact that millions of U.S. jobs are being offshored and outsourced does not bother advocates of globalism at all because it is supposedly a beneficial thing for the overall global economy.
And most Americans have little to no idea just how much influence international organizations such as the United Nations, the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO have over our daily lives.
The truth is that we already live in a world that has been deeply, deeply integrated. As this continues, at some point it will only seem "natural" for America to agree to a true global currency and full global political integration.
Let us hope that day never arrives. Or at least let us hope that the American people wake up enough to not just go passively into a "New World Order".
A global economy is bad for America and a global government would be really bad for America.
But perhaps you disagree. Perhaps you believe that integrating our economy, our currency and our government with the rest of the world would be a wonderful thing. If that is the case, please feel free to leave a comment explaining exactly why globalism is such a wonderful thing for all of us....
»
- ilene's blog
- 19151 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
I agree with you on Soros and the pound. But his doesn't invalidate the hard money argument. I think you know this.
Where I disagree with you is on generalizing the ZH population as rightwing nuts. I am certainly not a right wing nut. I'm not a democrat, I'm not a republican, in fact, I'm not American. I just like reading out of consensus ideas. This is the best spot to do it, even though some articles and posters are ridiculous. Find me a blog where this isn't the case... BTW: Krugman is the antichrist because he is a neoclassical hack. Neoclassical economics are partly bunk and thus very dangerous to rely on. His prescriptions are those of a witchdoctor (as are Bernanke's - see J Hussmans latest comments for more on this) and should not be filled by congress (the big drugstore which some people foolishly think have the remedy for whatever ails us, at any given time). Happy New Year to all Zerohedgers, right, left and center.
Control in Washington: The Dems took over in 2007 So Stop Blaming Bush
Democrats took over on January 3, 2007 in the House of Representatives and the Senate, controlling both chambers for the first time since the end of 1995.
When the Democrats took over in 2007, these figures were true:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77 (today it is up to 11,345.35, from low of 9,614 over the past year)
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5% (spending went from 34.98% to 43.85% - up nearly 10% in the 4 years of Democrat control)
The Unemployment rate was 4.6% (currently over 9%)
On January 3, 2007, Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee. Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee. They controlled the finances of this country, so explain to me how the economic meltdown that happened 15 months later Bush’s fault?
When did this crisis start?
Was it when 5-6 trillion dollars in toxic loans were dumped onto the economy from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
Was it when Obama took the third highest pay-off from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
Was it when Obama and the Democrat Congress fought against the reform of Fannie and Freddie?
Or was it when Bush asked Congress 17 times to stop Fannie and Freddie (starting in 2001).
.
.
.
http://www.examiner.com/republican-in-fort-collins/control-washington-th...
P.S. This economic crisis began earlier than you think, and only became desperate in the Fall of 2008, while Bush was at the helm.
BT
You are right - started way before 2008.
http://mortgageblues.us/news/398
Clinton repeal of Glass-Steagall faulty as seen today...
Economist Robert Kuttner has criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act as contributing to the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis.
Even earlier than this with 2001 Housing act passed by dems. Many things contributed the crisis we are experiencing today.
I won't go into everything - too much time - don't have it.
LTJ,
Fannie and Freddie don't originate loans, you know. They buy mortgages from the banks, in order to give the banks more money to lend. They are pubicly traded, government sponsored financial entities. Moreover, they were not backed by Government guarantees, although they have been placed in conservatorship run by the Federal Housing Financial Agency since September or 2008.
Well said - since you are obviously a Soros remora (the kindest thing I could think to say). Time to go pick up your check from George. Ka Ching! More of that easy money!
Could work, then again, could precipitate a currency crisis which would be most unpleasant. If/when China decides to break the peg, we'll have to see what follows.
Zero Hedge is above the false left-right paradigm. If I wanted to hear monkeys "eeking" about "left" and "right" wings I wouldn't be here.
Of course not, this site is not over the real left-right claim over power paradigm.
The site overall population is fragmented.
People for whom the left-right paradigm is still vivid because it translate into concrete advantages. So you get the usual partisan bickering between right and left wingers, who are members of their respective gangs.
Then people who want to sell the idea that the left vs right paradigm is false because no matter who they vote for, they are on the loser side. They are no longer members of the right or left gangs, therefore targets of theirs gang actions no matter what and they equate their existence as a third party with the left-right paradigm does not exist.
Then, a tiny population that is not concerned by the left-right paradigm.
Double Post.
+++. This is one of the few places where "right" and "left" actually find some occasional common ground, or at least bother to objectively look at an opposing viewpoint. One thing I try to do is read comments without first looking at the name of the poster. I find myself kind of surprised at some of the people I am agreeing with, or at the very least beginning to understand their position.
Any fool can see the US has problems. The battle ground as I see it is the role of government in the solution. Progressives believe we need more 2,000 page pieces of legislation while conservatives feel government is the root of the problem and the reason why bubbles are so severe.
And no, I'm not an anarchist. Government certainly plays a role but lets try enforcing the rules we do have.
Libertarians. Conservatives have been co-opted by neo-cons.
Nice reality distortion field you have there. I'd estimate that 80-90% of the commenters on ZH voted for the republican ticket in 2000, 2004 and 2008.
Most articles are very strongly slanted in a pro-republican and anti-progressive fashion. Liberals like Krugman are the anti-Christ here. Central bankers like Bernanke are being ridiculed for the incredible sin of trying to ease and lower interest rates and kick-start the economy. The desire of providing health-care to citizens (which in most civilized countries is provided as a natural form of personal security) is being derided as some sort of left-wing conspiracy and 'freeloading'. (I'm sure people will be flocking to have extra heart operations, just to 'freeload', right? :-) ) Allowing the rich to free-load on the rest of society via incredibly low US income taxes is being hailed as some sort of essential freedom on the other hand.
I couldn't make all that stuff up if I wanted to :-) Right now ZH is so far down the right-wing propaganda hole as it gets.
The game is still being played, a little early to call it propaganda don't you think?
Isn't it horrible that people can see the direction the country is moving and draw their own conclusions?
I know you progressives think Ben is doing God's work and saving us all, but many conservatives think he is merely kicking the can down the road. At very least it would be helpful if you could provide some historical references that showed where printing money has led to prosperity.
Lets be honest here,as far as the US goes we are in very bad shape. Bernanke is NOT doing the right thing by printing money to inflate the only asset he can the US stock markets and this is not helping anyone in the long run. He is creating another bubble along the lines of bubble past and this bubble will be the worst of all. As far as taxes go this countries tax base is not that great and i am not talking about income taxes,we are taxed in this country if we blow our noses and this is killing the middle and lower income families and we are and will become a third world country the RICH the POOR and nothing inbetween. Have you been to the grocery store lately? Inflation is rampant in this country and i am not talking about the BS numbers the GOVT gives you real inflation is much much higher. Stap yourself in! Buy 6 months supply of food,water and gold and silver and you will be fine. MAYBE
yes you could...you just did!
Well, I can link to numerous ZH articles that prove all of the points I made - i.e. I can prove my claims. Do you claim that all my points were "made up"?
It looks like you're an english person and that explains your slant on things which i'll explain to you and the uncomprehending yanks.
You want folks to discuss your points.
' The desire of providing health-care to citizens (which in most civilized countries is provided as a natural form of personal security) is being derided...'
This shows the classic british culture of dependency nurtured by socialist post-war left wing governments. after ww2 germany spent its loans on industry, the uk created its welfare state and national health service, the nhs.
while these were meant to be a safety net they soon became election winners were the population were bought off with promises of expansion. the nhs is now a bottomless money pit where foreigners put their relatives on a plane to the uk, with kidney failure to get free dialysis when they arrive.
the UK was bankrupt until north sea oil was discovered.
the oil revenue pays just enough to cover the nhs and it will soon be gone.
then what.... free health for all? even if 1/3 of its dr's are foreign?
the recent labour government brought in 3 million, mainly unskilled, immigrants and kept 2.8 million people on welfare.
the brits have gone soft and only a severe, total shock will keep them from their freebies.
can you see this? the uk is going to pay for its high and mighty, holier than thou attitude of its politicos - that is the ordinary bloke on the street will.
you can't blame people here for getting nervous about that sort of largesse - in a perfect world yes, but sadly not in the real world.
I've never used the NHS so I have no first-hand experience with it. (I do know that it's a migration magnet for young european doctors so its quality must be pretty good.)
Mind pointing out problems you can see with the german health care system?
It works splendid from a citizen's point of view and it is also a good deal for taxpayers: the per capita health costs of german citizens is almost 50% less than that of US citizens.
Except that germans get an infinitely better deal for their money: coverage is a birthright to every citizen. Your spouse and your children are also covered. No 'recissions' no 'you lose your coverage if you lose your job' kind of idiotic nonsense.
As a side note, this is probably a productivity boon as well: the worst thing you can do to a freshly unemployed citizen (who is spending as much energy on finding a new job or creating a new business as possible) is to make him or her worry about lost health care coverage for the family ...
It's also not an open-ended tax: costs are cut off at around 500 euros and scale up to that maximum contribution amount on an income-scaled basis. It's more like an income-scaled insurance fee with a maximum.
So yes, the US health care system is borderline inhuman. It is not worthy of a modern, developed society. You can do better!
Your avatar looks as freaky as your economic political point of view sounds. I will guess you are a trust fund non-contributor. GFYSLF
I'm glad you were unable to dispute the facts I listed - if the only concrete complaint you have about my posting is my avatar I must be doing something right :-)
Some more food for thought, here's a historical graph of past UK recessions:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2009/nov/25/gdp-uk-1948-growth-e...
Check the '90-93 recession graph, and see that that shortly after Soros broke the Bank of England in '92, the UK economy took off, partly fueled by UK corporations getting more competitive export-wise, due to the weaker, post-Soros pound.
Of course Soros did it not out of philanthropy but out of pure speculation - but the interesting fact is still that this was a (massive) act of currency speculation that broke the BOE old-guard policy and turned out to be hugely beneficial to the UK, all things considered.
i was wrong above as I realize that guy says same thing about raise taxes on rich if Soros wants that so I sorry and i idiot today.
Monday and my bad as ususal.
40 lashes matey.
Look you 'City' Rothschild Banking Mafia Shill STFU! Yea if you nuke Nagasaki and rebuild it it looks newer than before. Its still radioactive and growin' 6 fingered babies so that is why the English are all have inbred horse faces. (a queen actually was killed once when the ropes broke holding the donkey being lowered on top of her to fuck her good). Go figure!
Goldman Sacks was the 'Disintegration' tool used to kill the tax protesting middle class who pay the majority of taxes relative to their income. You hi rollers on this site could give a rats ass cause you all earn so much that sales taxes and income taxes no longer eat up your 'discresionary income'. So the DHS = Stasi = Secret Citizen Spy Agency. Just like Stasi were supposed to stop external terrorists and spys, DHS is to do the same but only spys on USA citizens. When was the last time a big fat machine gun toten bro workin fer DHS was nice to your skinny white ass. If little Napolean's DHS was really DHS they would be chasin wet backs jumpin into El Paso instead of hiring her fat gay cousins to work as fanny fingerin TSA agents.
Don't you sheep get it? Oh I see, the CIA took all the E.German Stasi files in 1990. So nobody can figure out the stuff in the book NDCIC about NYC Jew Mafia funding Bolshevicks for the Rothschilds Shell Oil Co to drill in Siberia against Tzars wishes. Jews were mostly all of Stalins Komizars who killed 60 million Ruskies. Jews were running the Stasi in Poland and E. Germany apparently according to reports from me shipmates from that neck of da woods folks. When Kaptin Krunch say Jew Mafia running the world, we back up what we say with facts.
Here is Stasi in E.Germany website showing disintegration is used to destroy someone secretly. The USA middle class has secretly been killed by the Jew Mafia cause we hate the Federal Reserve the most since it makes middle class pay the highest tax (total % tax to discretionary income ratio).
http://www.runde-ecke-leipzig.de/cms/Section-9-Room-109.238.0.html?&L=1
Fuck and then Burn Bernanke!
Ben Burnyankee say: "We wacked Jesus & JFK for Bank Bustin' and walked, and have a 40 foot container of Gringo Bar-B-Q sauce"
Read Best Bank Book "None Dare Call It Conspiracy":
www.filefactory.com/file/b422gc9/n/ndcic.pdf
Video shows CIA & LAPD Import Cocaine:
www.filefactory.com/file/b42304b/n/crackthecia.wmv
Kennedy was right when he said to bust CIA into 1000 pieces. They the hitmen for the Jew Mafia at the Fed Reserve (aka Goldman Sackers)
STASI VIDEO:
part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb7B1fHB_0I
part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDwNO_hGJFM
part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMnrK7jYi-M
part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-ZPI-aaOjg
part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkSVWMDm5i0
part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8h9E6s85GYg
You're a piece of shit.
oh sorry I read the guys post wrong or jumped in wrong so i take it back that dude is on same side as me.
Sorry my bad
If the UK economy is so great, then why the austerity we hear about? Why are the students rioting over increased fees? From what I hear the UK is sucking wind wind just like we are.
Wrong decade dude. Soros broke the BOE in 1992. There's been at least two global cycles since then.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
But shouldn't the world's people have something to say about all of this?
Perhaps the world's people do want a "managed decline" of the U.S. dollar.
Perhaps the world's people do want an end of the old "global currency".
Perhaps the world's people do want a "New World Order" that's not based on the dollar or any other FIAT money.