This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Global warming exposed as UN-funded fraud
Global warming exposed as UN-funded fraud
by Project Mayhem
Russian computer hackers have published emails and source code from the UN-affiliated Climate Research Unit showing profound corruption, fraud, and criminal activity. What's really behind the Copenhagen treaty?
Recently, Russian hackers published over 160mb of scientific emails and source code taken from the primary 'climate research unit' -- the University of East Anglia, which is the center of UN/IPCC-promoted global warming alarmism. What the emails and data prove is shocking, and may represent the greatest scandal in the history of science.
In the emails, these UN-funded scientists talk about deleting data under FOIA request, faking data for journals such as Nature, conspiring to keep opposing science out of peer-reviewed journals (which they controlled the editorial boards), using "tricks" to "hide the [cooling period]" etc.
A picture emerges of big science funded to the tune of billions of dollars for the purposes of an underlying international political agenda. The degree of collusion between big media, the UN, and corrupted scientists involved in frank criminal activity is deeply disturbing. As I have detailed before, the purpose here is a political one. Global warming, or now abstractly identified as 'climate change', has been chosen by international banks and think tanks as the method of induction of vast political and social engineering never before seen in the history of the world.
We see based on the activities of criminals representing themselves as 'climate scientists' that the politics came first, and the science came second. They were more than happy to represent the political interests of the UN and international banks -- as long as their lab was well-funded. But there are politics behind this indeed. Here is a small sample of the underlying political agenda: Billions in new taxes, International regulatory control under the UN, Goldman Sachs/CCX carbon trading, Obliteration of national sovereignty, extreme forced austerity and reduction of the standard of living, deindustrialization of the First World countries, and implementation of Orwellian state policies for the purposes of "carbon tracking". The science does not matter -- the politics does.
Let us consider for a moment the cynical political objectives behind 'global warming' before we delve into the mountain of evidence thanks to the leaked emails and source code.
Global Warming and Orwellian State Policy
The Dutch government attempts to introduce GPS tracking units in everyone's cars under the pretext of 'climate change'.
THE HAGUE — The Dutch government said Friday it wants to introduce a "green" road tax by the kilometre from 2012 aimed at cutting carbon dioxide emissions by 10 percent and halving congestion.
"Each vehicle will be equipped with a GPS device that tracks how many kilometres are driven and when and where. This data will be then be sent to a collection agency that will send out the bill," the transport ministry said in a statement.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iYPTOtIepVKcGL_AcCZFe1ht99UQ
Global Warming and New Taxes
One of the primary political aspects of the global warming fraud is the imposition of a massive and bewildering array of new taxes. Obviously it is plain to see how this is in the interest of governments and banks, particularly if such taxes are imposed on an individual level.
Carbon Insurance For Your Car May Be Down The Road [Green Gas Taxes at Pumps] by Terry Tamminen (cnbc.com) - Nov. 13, 2009.
"A carbon insurance premium could easily be included in such a gas pump surcharge so drivers pay the true cost of operating their vehicles in terms of all relevant risks, including their fair share of creating both fender benders and climate change collisions."
http://www.cnbc.com/id/33906802
Carbon ration account for all proposed by Environment Agency by Ben Webster (timesonline.co.uk) - Nov. 9, 2009.
"Everyone should be given an annual carbon ration and face financial penalties if they exceed it, under a proposal by the Environment Agency"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6909046.ece
Global Warming and Personal Autonomy
Selling your house? It could be a green crime
Queensland’s flailing government has now made it a crime to sell your house without first doing a big green audit:
QUEENSLANDERS selling their homes will soon have to complete a 56-point questionnaire detailing the property’s environmental credentials
Global Warming and Forced Austerity
The UN has advocated funding global birth control initiatives [read: 'population security'] in order to 'reduce CO2 emissions'. Of course now we know the connection between CO2 and temperatures is based on fabricated data . . . So where does that leave such UN population initiatives?
UN says Birth control the most effective way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions [UN Wants More Abortions and Sterilizations to cut Co2] by Ben Webster (timesonline.co.uk) - Nov. 19, 2009.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6922245.ece
The population control objectives of the global warming fraud do not end there. Andrew Revkin, an NYT correspondent identified in the leaked CRU emails exhibiting a very cozy relationship with the corrupt scientists, advocates restrictions on the number of children couples are permitted to have via the issuance of 'carbon credits'. This is similar to what was advocated by Obama's chief science advisor John Holdren in his book Ecoscience. There is a political agenda behind global warming.
"Should–probably the single-most concrete and substantive thing an American, young American, could do to lower our carbon footprint is not turning off the lights or driving a Prius, it’s having fewer kids, having fewer children,” said Revkin. “So should there be, eventually you get, should you get credit–If we’re going to become carbon-centric–for having a one-child family when you could have had two or three,” said Revkin.
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=55667
The above is significant because Revkin is identified in the leaked emails corresponding with the corrupt Climate Research Unit (CRU) and has written many pro-global warming articles for the New York Times.
Global Warming and Systemic Financial Fraud
Where would we be in a Zerohedge article without mention of the fraudsters at Goldman Sachs. No doubt they are present in almost every evil or fraudulent enterprise known to man and global warming is no exception. Certainly these charlatans plan on making billions trading hallucinated carbon credits on Maurice Strong's Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX).
Al Gore's "Carbon Trading" Scam Reeks of Who Else? Goldman
http://www.goldmansachs666.com/2009/05/al-gores-carbon-trading-scam-reeks-of.html
These examples illustrate how the global warming fraud is used to push a far-reaching political agenda -- an agenda born out of the unholy fusion of governments , banks, and corrupt scientists. But let us consider now the content of the leaked emails.
Scientific corruption at the highest levels:
From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow. I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH nd N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
source: http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7810
Obviously the above email speaks for itself. Despite the glaringly obvious fraud, Phil Jones and his collaborators across the world would have you believe that "trick" and "hiding the decline" are simply normal procedures in any scientific laboratory. The FORTRAN source code tells a different story.
Climate Research Unit FORTRAN code backs up claims of fraud and corruption
Neal from Climate Audit writes:
"People are talking about the emails being smoking guns but I find the remarks in the code and the code more of a smoking gun. The code is so hacked around to give predetermined results that it shows the bias of the coder. In other words make the code ignore inconvenient data to show what I want it to show. The code after a quick scan is quite a mess. Anyone with any pride would be to ashamed of to let it out public viewing. As examples [of] bias take a look at the following remarks from the MANN code files:"
function mkp2correlation,indts,depts,remts,t,filter=filter,refperiod=refperiod,$
datathresh=datathresh
;
; THIS WORKS WITH REMTS BEING A 2D ARRAY (nseries,ntime) OF MULTIPLE TIMESERIES
; WHOSE INFLUENCE IS TO BE REMOVED. UNFORTUNATELY THE IDL5.4 p_correlate
; FAILS WITH >1 SERIES TO HOLD CONSTANT, SO I HAVE TO REMOVE THEIR INFLUENCE
; FROM BOTH INDTS AND DEPTS USING MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION AND THEN USE THE
; USUAL correlate FUNCTION ON THE RESIDUALS.
;
pro maps12,yrstart,doinfill=doinfill
;
; Plots 24 yearly maps of calibrated (PCR-infilled or not) MXD reconstructions
; of growing season temperatures. Uses “corrected” MXD – but shouldn’t usually
; plot past 1960 because these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to
; the real temperatures.
;
"Spin that, spin it to the moon if you want. I’ll believe programmer notes over the word of somebody who stands to gain from suggesting there’s nothing “untowards” about it.
Either the data tells the story of nature or it does not. Data that has been “artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures” is false data, yielding a false result."
-Anthony Watts, Meteorologist
Discussion
The source code above shows that the scientists involved manipulated their data in order to achieve a predetermined outcome. This is fraud, plain and simple. What is worse is these scientists also deliberately deleted the paper trail showing their research was fraudulent when the FOA requests arrived. This is criminal activity at the highest levels, and these people should be investigated and prosecuted. The massive amounts of funding they were provided with was used to lie to the public , in order to achieve the objectives of the UN and its affiliated think tanks, whether these scientists were aware of the implication of their corruption or not. The point is these entire 'climate change' claims need to be thrown in the trash heap and evaluated by competent scientists without financial or political interests in the outcome of their research.
And above all, the UN's Copenhagen treaty for dramatic forced austerity and international political control should be exposed for the vicious and cynical hoax it actually is. Copenhagen is the culmination of these fraudulent policies. National sovereignty will once again be reduced under a treaty conceived and funded by think tanks and international banks. Massive taxes will be imposed. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan will make billions trading hallucinated carbon credits. Orwellian state policies for tracking individuals and interfering in personal autonomy will become acceptable under the pretext of 'stopping climate change', despite the entire rationale being fraudulent. Monopolistic international finance capital and the billionaire elitists behind it believe they are about to achieve another victory over the unwashed masses with the Copenhagen treaty.
The true political objective behind global warming was proven beyond a doubt in the Club of Rome publication The First Global Revolution. Keep in mind Al Gore is a member of this elitist group of policymakers, and even chaired a full Club of Rome meeting in Washington DC in 1997.
"“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
-Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991.
We should understand that the international political agenda underlying the falsified global warming scandal is, at its core, an ideology of corrupt banks and politicians intent on framing humanity as the enemy , in order to achieve purposes of social control. Thus, it is no surprise that the 'science' behind global warming has been exposed as fraudulent.
For in-depth coverage of this growing scandal, see:
You can download the full copy of the leaked documents and source code here:
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_emails%2C_data%2C_models%2C_1996-2009
»
- advertisements -
Phospherous weapons using pieces of slime trash scum.
You probably saw the news (by the stock price), but if not:
Origin Agritech Announces Final Approval of World's First Genetically Modified Phytase CornChina’s First Transgenic Corn Introduces the Next Generation of Agricultural Products
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Origin-Agritech-Announces-bw-2754575064.html?x=0&.v=1
Thanks Gilgamesh. The phosphorus issue is huge as most large livestock producers are limited on how much phosphorus can be applied to land via manure. Phytase has become an important tool limiting phosphorus entering into waterways...see "dead zone, Mississippi Delta." Pretty much everyone I know in production uses it from cattle to hogs to poultry, etc.
so in effect this would make the phosphorus in the corn more available to the livestock, thereby requiring less phosphorus to be applied, yes?
is this why farmers are using manure to provide phosphorus right now, cuz the cows are crapping most of it out?
"Phytase is currently used as an additive in animal feed to breakdown phytic acid in corn, which holds 60% of the phosphorus in corn. Phytase increases phosphorus absorption in animals by 60%. Phosphorus is an essential element for the growth and development of all animals, and plays key roles in skeletal structure and in vital metabolic pathways."
holy glowing cowshit, batman
Mayhem...
I would seed and harvest 4,000 acres a year (wheat, canola, soybean, oats in rotation) with my cousin in Manitoba each year until he sold the farm this spring.
Seed issues loom large with all the local farmers. In an escalating "Yield War" we require planting the highest yielding, drought tolerant, and fastest growing strains of GMO seed around just to survive. Once you do however you must sign contracts to "deliver" the crop back to them at harvest. You don't even own your own crop.
The "terminator seed is the "Holy Grail" of agricultural bioengineering. Forget about all the GMO issues with splicing 'pesticide' and even animal genes into your food crops... with the literal control over the ability of the planet to feed itself there will certainly be dark days ahead for all.
The masses are sleepwalking into uncharted territory here... will they ever wake up before it's too late?
not to mention the farmers that choose not to use terminator seeds but whose fields are contaminated by stray airbornes and who are then are visited by monsanto's legal jackboots for patent infringement.
It does occaisionally occur through pollen contamination (usually on the outside of the fields) however (sorry guys) most farmers just don't wish to pay. If you are selling a GMO-free certified crop however you are screwed... and I think it would be difficult to sue for the losses... hey... the wind blows right?
"most farmers just don't wish to pay"
Why should they, just because some patent clerk granted crazed monopolists power to call in murderous thugs.
They are being Americans, preserving their livelihood and their culture, as is their Right.
Agreed. (mostly)
You can get a patent for any retarded thing that is as common in the collective conciousness as water is in the ocean if you simply have a big enough army of assertive lawyers, bribers and rhetorik speakers.
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7423643.html
this is really interesting stuff zero...thanks for sharing.
ZerOhead,
Could you write more on this topic? Perhaps even submit a piece to ZH for posting as a "Contributor"? Your real world knowledge of what we are all facing would be valuable (and as it also has economic implications would be appropriate for the site). In a nutshell, if you could write on how this impacted your own farming, what farmers in general face, how it impacts you from a profit/loss standpoint, and what the environmental considerations are. There is a lot of alarmist writing out there, but word from someone who truly knows would be useful in letting us know just how alarmed we should be. I fear we should be quite alarmed, but reserve final judgement.
I agree.
Zerohead, I would very much appreceite it if you shared more of your knowledge in this subject in the sort of an expanded article or comment. This is a matter of extreme importance and your education of this forum could prove invaluable.
Precarious situation of global food supply due to deterioration of quality farmland and potential inability of access to farm credit due to credit/future currency crisises are the number one and two bullets IMO right now...
There hasn't been many years with an increase in grain inventories in case anyone cared to notice... if you want I can do something... but who do I contact?
How does this sound. There are no "masses". There are, however, a lot of people, in a lot of professions, and each profession requires so much specialized knowledge today that if you are in one profession, you really don't have time to find out what is going on in the other professions. But the Masters have many think tanks and the think tanks have many computers, and they can crank out new programs aimed at steering every profession toward imposing more shackles on the citizenry. Your example may be farming, where the new program is genetically altered seeds, which do not reproduce, therefore making farmers share-croppers even if they own their own land. Here is another example: in simple land ownership, two new programs are "Low Impact Development" and "Surface and Groundwater Protection". These two thought is okay, but the new programs require you (including you a simple homeowner) to get a Landscape Architect to design, and the local government to permit, anything you do to your own property. I bet everyone on this board can name some new program in his particular profession that is being pushed down from he knows not where, and which will spy on, require permits of, and tax his customers. I don't know what the solution is, but it seems that we cannot wait for "the masses" to understand what is going on, but rather each profession must band together and fight the new programs being pushed at it. So everyone has a job to do.
P.S. In the USA, fighting such regulations is one thing the Republicans preach, while they actually impose just as much new government regulation as the Democrats. Not that I trust those guys either. I trust neither. Truly, there seems to be really only one party, and "we control all sides".
excellent post
A bit of fun.
"Hide the Decline"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk
I could but my problem is that I wouldn't know how to stop once I got started.
I could rant on about quality and performance issues with the GMO seed that we've had delivered itself... (we've had some huge 'insurance' payouts) to the operational clusterfucks that occur when you are contracted to deliver to only one specific elevator during harvest... (you usually don't have enough bin storage to store your entire crop so you have to take it to the elevator.
Often the elevator you are contractually required to deliver to is full until the next train of grain cars arrive to clean it out. So you are stuck with 3 combine harvesters ($300/hr operating cost each), one grain cart and four or five trucks and 8 guys sitting idle while your crop is exposed to the inevitable rain and weather that diminishes the grade quality and $$ faster than you can say Monsanto.
(Hint... we just usually take that days harvest to another elevator and say nothing... and you think you are buying GMO free... see I can't really tell you what goes on until the statute of limitations expire... 2 years I think.)
Then there are the issues about the nature of what we doing by eliminating much of the natural biodiversity in the strains themselves... and yes contamination through crosspollination is a threat... but only for those who clean their own seed. Most buy the newest "hot" seed anyway... you can't afford to give away yield.
If there is a real desire here to know about what goes on in the business I'm sure my cousin will be happy to oblige you with the nightmares... he's currently in the Netherlands or France nursing his peptic ulcers...
anonymouse, while awaiting zerohead's response, try this for anecdotal accounts from farmers:
http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/11/worst-harvest-season-ever-seen.html