You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Gold Price To Double As China Prepares To Increase Its Gold Holdings Tenfold

Tyler Durden's picture




From Rosie's morning update:

Gold just capped off its best month in a year — up 14% in November and 34% so far in 2009. Not even the S&P 500 can compete with that. Helping drive the latest gains was the news out of the China Gold Association that the country’s gold demand is on pace this year to exceed 450 metric tonnes, a 14% increase over the 395.6 tonnes in 2008. (In contrast to India, jewelry sales are up double-digits in China so far this year.) By way of comparison, China, which recently surpassed South Africa as the world’s largest producer, is on its way to 310 tons of newly mined output this year, or more than 30% below its level of demand.

It’s not just the middle-class in China that is starting to buy gold, but the central bank, which has very deep pockets, is going to do likewise. We just came across a Bloomberg News article quoting an official from the state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (Ji Xiaonan, the Chief) as saying “we recommend China increase its gold reserves to 6,000 metric tons within three-to-five years and possibly to 10,000 tons in eight to 10 years.” China’s reserves, after a 76% buildup since 2003, currently stand at 1,054 tons, so we are talking here about the prospect of some pretty heaving buying in coming years.

If China were to lift their gold reserves to 5,000 tonnes, which is equivalent to about two years of global production, that shift in demand would boost the gold price by $800/oz to around $2,000 ($1,978) based on our models. If China moves towards 10,000 tonnes, well, that would end up taking the gold price to $2,623/ounce if our calculations are in the ball-park.

Make no mistake, we are gold bulls. Central banks have deep pockets and production of gold is stagnant so the demand-supply backdrop for bullion is bullish. At the same time, we have to pay respect for market positioning over the near-term. The market for precious metals is overextended right now after the parabolic move of the past two months. The net speculative long position has swelled to a record 273,552 contracts (100 ounces each) on the COMEX. Open interest has never been higher, at 693,661 contracts. So this is one crowded trade — as is the short-trade on the USD against all the major currencies, especially the commodity-based units.

So, we could get a meaningful gold correction at any time, and we are talking about a correction in what is still a secular bull market — the 200-day moving average is $970/oz, which means we could get as much as a 20% pullback and no fundamental trendline would be violated. We remain long-term gold bulls, and our commentary remains fundamentally bullish, but anything that could spark a countertrend rally in the U.S. dollar, which is our principal near-term concern, would put gold at a much better price point for investors than the peak we are at today.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:36 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

The tiny size of the gold market should scare the crap out of anyone who is not long gold.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:57 | Link to Comment estaog
estaog's picture

If you don't own gold and there is short supply and it increases to $2,000 you should be scared? Perhaps 'annoyed' to have missed the rally, but 'scared'?

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:27 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

"The tiny size of the gold market should annoy the crap out of anyone who is not long gold."

It just doesn't make sense, does it?  The tiny size of the gold market enables massive moves in short time periods, and anyone who wants to not be "annoyed" by severe loss of buying power during a USD event should be....apprehensive?  After all, it is not that gold is going up, but that your dollars are going down.  Are you wealthy enough to be merely annoyed by a 40% loss of your real wealth?  What's your point?

Wed, 12/02/2009 - 05:42 | Link to Comment aus_punter
aus_punter's picture

i'm not sure he has a point though your assertion that dollars are going down is only partly correct....gold is rallying in most currencies not just USD and in any event USD is broadly unchanged over the last month

I think THE trade for the next year is long gold in terms of $AUD, both in terms of being hedged in the low volatility scenario and being a spactacular winner should both legs perform

look at the performance of aussie FI .... next move aint a rise

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 13:09 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Yes. Scared is absolutely the correct word to use because it means that ALL paper financial assets including the fiat money you call "dollars" have had their value cut in half in real terms without any sort of nominal "crash" happening. Physical Gold will be the only asset safe from the fire that is about to engulf all paper assets.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:37 | Link to Comment Ivanovich
Ivanovich's picture

Great, so in the short term, it could go either up or down.  Got it.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:11 | Link to Comment BobPaulson
BobPaulson's picture

Hmmm, sounds like 95% of forecasts you hear.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:43 | Link to Comment Thaisleeze (not verified)
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 13:45 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

london would be effed

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 17:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:50 | Link to Comment order6102
order6102's picture

again... 20% correction... and who cares... there r some people here who buy from BOE 10yr ago at 250... 20% here, 20% there... whatever. I honesty think, anyone who been buying gold and who is not 15yr old, should have their average somewhere in 500-600 range, well within any 20% correction... and if you are 15 - trade SPX..

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:03 | Link to Comment Zro
Zro's picture

Stock market up, GS down. Was the same yesterday but flipped until EOD when both converged. Weird price action lately.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:10 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Tungsten?

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:21 | Link to Comment NRGTDR
NRGTDR's picture

i think they really mean months and not years. the dollar wont last that long. also they have bid again for a gold-copper mining firm is OZ too. glad i doubled up yesterday.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:28 | Link to Comment KeyserSöze
KeyserSöze's picture

This is China's way of saying to the oligarchs that they will not float their currency but they will destroy the relative value of the dollar in the process...

Rememer every dollar that is spent on gold is NOT SPENT ON TREASURIES, OR USD ASSETS.

essentially a middle finger to the oligarchs and western central bankers

This is equivolent to a financial soap opera...what isn't funny is that everyone around the world is suffering as the power struggle continues

 

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 14:11 | Link to Comment Mark Beck
Mark Beck's picture

If China remains on this course, this is a huge sign that they have lost confidence in the USD, and as such, will mean divestiture from USD holdings, albeit gradual. With the China trip, what the administration was attempting to do was increase USD confidence, not decrease it. I know I will be watching to see if China significantly reduces Treasury holdings over the next year.

Mark Beck 

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:46 | Link to Comment geopol
geopol's picture

Gold           $1200.90

Silver         $    19.19

Platinum   $1491.00

Palladium $  390.00

11:29:30 EDT

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:37 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Retail gold- $ 1,196.90/oz

100 oz. Dec. delivery- $ 929.90

200 tons purchased by India- about $ 385.00/ oz.

Keep blowing that smoke boys.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 22:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 12:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 13:33 | Link to Comment asdf
asdf's picture

no, under a gold standard, the chinese can't have an artificially low currency and they think they need it to import employment from other countries.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 13:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 14:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 13:38 | Link to Comment topshelfstuff
topshelfstuff's picture

"""Gold Price To Double As China Prepares To Increase Its Gold Holdings Tenfold"""

[[[ and do so at a huge Discount if The Crooks prevail ]]]

I call this RED HERRING
The coup de grâce

I posted my view on this here before. I'm waiting for People to awaken...to The Crooks who have been hammering the thought of China having to ReValue the Yuan. the Crooks all use the same Script, of course, they all say a 40% Raise in the value of the Yuan is needed, for starters.....the Fact that this would allow China, and The Crooks to then buy Gold and Silver, along with any other Commodity, at a 40% Discount, has, so far, slipped by...even those who otherwise see Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner, the Corp. Elite, the MSMedia, etc., for what they are, haven't acknowledged that this is the largest Scam of all. Haven't the Warning Flags raised seeing that this comes from the very same Gang ?

Look at it this way. I'll use a $1,000 Piece of Gold, through to June 2005 it took 8,280 Yuan to equal $1,000/USD, it now takes 6,282 Yuan, The Crooks want it to be 4,000 Yuan for $1,000/USD...Who Benefits? You get the picture now ? This also Increases the Purchasing Power of the Workers in China, and haven't this same group been hammering the table for them to Spend, Spend, Spend, and stop saving so much.....so this way they get the equivelent of a Huge Pay Raise w/o the Companies actually having to numerically raise the Pay rate...the new consumers of the World; China and the EastBloc Nations, the BRICettes. The BRICettes = BRIC plus Asia, x-Japan, most of South/Latin America, and assorted other countries.

Geithner Warning on Yuan May Renew U.S.-China Tension

Jan. 23 (Bloomberg)
================================

Paulson promotes letting yuan rise
Martin Crutsinger ASSOCIATED PRESS
Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said Tuesday that China must continue allowing its currency to rise in value against the dollar as part of reforms to address trade tensions with the United States.

Mr. Paulson praised the Chinese for allowing their currency to rise in value by more than 20 percent against the dollar since July 2005, but said it's critical that currency reform process be allowed to continue.

American manufacturers contend that undervalued Chinese currency puts them at a competitive disadvantage and is a key reason for the huge trade gap between the two countries.

"Making this shift will take bold leadership and decisive structural reforms to boost demand among households," Mr. Paulson said in a speech previewing his upcoming trip to China. "As I have said in the past, continued reform of China's exchange rate policies is an integral part of this broader reform process."

The U.S. and other major trading partners have long complained that the yuan is undervalued.

American manufacturers contend that the yuan is undervalued by as much as 40 percent even with its increase in value since the summer of 2005. They argue that the Chinese government is manipulating the yuan's value to gain unfair trade advantages against U.S. companies.

[[[ deduct 40% and you get 4 to $1 ---up to June 2005 it was 8.28 to $1]]]

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 19:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 13:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 12/01/2009 - 17:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!