Goldman On Gold: $1,450/Oz

Tyler Durden's picture

And forthwith, the oracle speaks. The much awaited 2010 Commodity Outlook is out. Here is the 2010 summary breakdown:

Some commentary:

As we start a new decade with the global economy emerging from the worst recession of the post-war era, we expect the commodity supply-side constraints of the past decade to once again reemerge, reinforcing the sustainability of higher long-term commodity prices – a theme we first began discussing at the turn of the current decade. However, the inability to grow supply after a decade of sharply higher prices turns the question of the sustainability of higher long-term commodity prices into one of the sustainability of higher long-term growth. Anemic supply growth of energy and basic materials runs head-on into the ongoing revolution in emerging markets generated by more than a billion people rising into the ranks of the middle class over the next decade.

We maintain that this undesirable outcome is not the inevitable result of dismal Malthusian logic, but rather the result of deliberate choices as expressed through policy. At the beginning of the current decade, we argued that decades of inadequate investment in commodity productive infrastructure were leading to a "Revenge of the Old Economy", where a constrained supply base would sustain higher commodity prices. Toward the end of the current decade we argued that the "Revenge of the Old Economy" had turned into the "Revenge of the Old 'Political' Economy" where significant policy constraints on the free flow of capital, labor and technology were substantially constraining supply growth for many commodities, regardless of price or expected return. Furthermore, these protectionist policies caused capital not to flow to the most efficient commodity investment but rather to the most freely accessible one that was usually inefficient, extremely high cost/tax with poor rates of return, which put more upward pressure on prices, or in some cases the capital did not flow at all, creating outright physical shortages.

But not all commodity markets finished the decade supply constrained. Impressive supply growth in several key commodities in recent years proves that many of these supply-side problems can be alleviated through well aimed policy that motivates investment in resource constrained sectors. For example, the ability to freely invest in US domestic natural gas production has led to the technological breakthrough of unconventional shale gas plays, which has created a global glut of natural gas. In addition, investment in petroleum refineries and ferronickel pig iron technologies has led to sharp declines in petroleum product cracks and substantially lower nickel prices.

Moreover, in many of these cases, policy served to encourage rather than to discourage investment. For instance, while the United States and Europe opposed petroleum refinery investments owing to environmental concerns, India incentivized this investment through tax breaks, but maintained strict environmental standards, creating a "nearly zero-emission refinery" that uses state of the art technologies with a cost basis that has even driven some less sophisticated western refineries into closure.

Overall, these developments suggest three emerging themes that are likely to continue to dominate in 2010 and beyond:

  1. Differentiation between commodities driven by the extent of supply constraints that will likely drive greater price dispersion across the commodity complex;
  2. Resource realignment as emerging markets are forced to bid away scarce commodities from the developed economies, especially when supply constraints are more restrictive, which shifts the focus away from the sustainability of higher prices and towards the sustainability of higher growth;
  3. Increasing macroeconomic correlations as resource realignment will likely increase the relevance of commodity prices and supply to the broader macroeconomic environment.

Differentiation between commodities driven by the extent of supply constraints will likely drive greater price dispersionOver the past decade a substantial amount of investment and technological innovation has taken place across the commodities complex with widely varying degrees of success. As we emphasized at the beginning of this decade, it was precisely this uncertainty in the success of different technologies that generated a premium in commodity prices above the observed marginal cost of production.

During the first part of this decade, almost all technological advances in commodity production failed. In energy, oil sands failed to deliver owing to energy and water constraints, gas- and coal-to-liquids proved too costly, biofuels used too much land and drove up agriculture prices, solar parks proved too expensive and wind used up too much real estate. All of these problems made scaling up these technologies too difficult. In metals, environmental impacts restricted the widespread use of otherwise productive technologies, while in agriculture GMO was simply additive to Borland and hybrid technologies.

By the end of this decade, however, some of these failures started to turn into successes, such as the technological breakthroughs that occurred in natural gas and nickel, which started to create differentiation in commodity pricing, especially when the ability (or inability) to grow supply was matched against emerging market demand growth.

Overall, the more binding the constraints on investment and supply growth and the more leverage to emerging market demand, the stronger the commodity price recovery has been this past year and the stronger the outlook is into 2010 and beyond. In particular, natural gas, refined petroleum products, nickel, wheat and aluminum have all seen significant growth in production capacity and with the exception of aluminum all have limited exposure to emerging market demand growth. Accordingly, these commodities have experienced far more modest price recoveries and have a much weaker forward price outlook. In sharp contrast, crude oil, copper, zinc, platinum, corn and soybeans all have binding supply constraints with far greater leverage to emerging market demand.

In the past, these types of shortages were largely dealt with by intra-commodity substitution. This behavior generated fundamental tightness across the commodities and drove the commodity price convergence that has been a key feature of the markets over the last five years, making the consumer indifferent to the specific commodity. For example, corn could be used for transportation like oil, for power generation like gas and for material like aluminum, so if the prices of these commodities were the same on a Btu basis, we were indifferent to the commodity.

However, the nature of the current shortages limits the ability to substitute, suggesting the likelihood of increased price divergence in coming years. For example, we expect that the substantial disconnect between oil and natural gas prices will likely be sustained over the medium term. When natural gas was in tight supply, oil could be used as a substitute to natural gas in the generation of electricity. However, substitution in the other direction does not work given current installed technologies and infrastructure.  In other words, oil can substitute for natural gas in power generation where it is predominantly used by combined cycle units that can burn both fuels, but natural gas cannot substitute for oil in transportation where oil is predominantly used without massive investment in infrastructure. The avenues to convert natural gas into an oil substitute are wide ranging but all very expensive – gas-to-liquids to turn natural gas into diesel, compressed natural gas (CNG) as a direct automotive fuel and electric cars. Until these investments are made or the gas glut is resolved, which is unlikely in the next three to five years,  natural gas is likely to trade at a steep discount to oil.

And while you can read the oil propaganda on your own (maybe just pull the summer 2008 report: same shit, different day), here is what Goldman had to say on Gold.

With the US Federal Reserve expected to keep its short-term nominal interest rate target near zero through 2011, we expect the low US real interest rate environment will continue to provide strong support for gold price in 2010 and 2011. However, as we also expect US inflation to remain subdued, we expect that gold prices will come under significant downward pressure once the US economic recovery strengthens and the US Federal Reserve begins to raise interest rates. Consequently, an earlier than expected tightening of US monetary policy is the primary downside risk to gold prices in 2010 and 2011, in our view. In the interim, however, we expect the low US real interest rate environment, continued gold-ETF buying and reduced Central Bank gold sales will allow gold prices to continue to move higher. Consequently, we raise our gold price forecasts to $1200/toz, $1260/toz and $1350/toz on a 3-, 6- and 12-month horizon, respectively, with a 2010 average price forecast of $1265/toz and a 2011 average price forecast of $1425/toz. While an earlier than expected tightening of US monetary policy presents a substantial downside risk to gold prices in 2010 and 2011, we believe the near-term risk to our gold price forecast is skewed to the upside.

While gold prices denominated in US dollars continue to march steadily high, looking at the price denominated in other currencies is a healthy reminder that gold prices remain creatures of their financial environment. For example, Australian dollar denominated gold prices peaked on February 20 of this year at 1563 AUD/toz and are currently 17.5% off of their highs. Meanwhile euro-denominated gold prices have only recently returned to their February 20 high of 789 E

While Exhibit 32 highlights the view of gold as a currency, we continue to believe that the impact of the financial environment on gold prices can best be understood by viewing gold as a commodity. As discussed in detail in our March 25, 2009 Commodities:

Frameworks: Forecasting gold as a commodity, US dollar-denominated gold prices are driven by different market fundamentals over long, medium and short horizons.

  • Long-horizon: Over long horizons (often more than a decade), the price of gold keeps pace with inflation. In 2008 US dollars, the long-run price of gold is near $420/toz.
  • Medium-horizon: Over medium horizons, the real price of gold fluctuates around its long-run price: pricing higher in low US real interest rate environments and lower in high US real interest rate environments.
  • Short-horizon: Over short horizons, fluctuations in the monetary demand for gold, notably gold-ETF buying and government central bank selling drive the price of gold relative to its medium-term real interest rate equilibrium.

This implies that the outlook for US inflation and interest rates is the key determinant of gold prices in the medium to long term. Our US Economics team expects that a slow US economic recovery will keep inflation rates low in 2010 and 2011 and lead the US Federal Reserve to maintain it short-term nominal interest rate target near zero. In our view, this has two important implications for gold prices in 2010 and 2011.

  • A continuing low US real interest rate environment will likely allow gold prices to continue to rise higher in 2010 and 2011.
  • The widening gap between current gold prices and their long-run inflation-adjusted average price of $420/toz combined with a benign US inflation outlook suggests that when the US economy strengthens and the US Federal Reserve tightens its monetary policy, the convergence of inflation-adjusted gold prices to their long-run average in a rising real interest rate environment will likely come through falling nominal US dollar denominated gold prices, not inflation.

This suggests that for the gold investor, US dollar-denominated gold will likely continue to rise in the expected low real US interest rate environment of 2010 and 2011. However, the widening gap between current gold prices and their long-run inflation-adjusted average price of $420/toz combined with a benign US inflation outlook suggest that an earlier than expected tightening of US monetary policy is the primary downside risk to gold. In short, we expect that the gold price-real interest rate cycle will turn when the US Federal Reserve begins to raise interest rates, but do not expect that to happen this year or next.

A continuing low US real interest rate environment will likely allow gold prices to continue to rise higher in 2010 and 2011

Gold prices have continued to drift higher since a surge in net speculative long positions first pushed prices through the $1000/toz mark in September (Exhibit 33). This surge in net speculative length preceded a decline in US real interest rates, with the yield on 10-year US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) falling more than 50 basis points to 1.20%, highlighting the strong relationship between US real interest rates, speculative positions and gold prices (Exhibit 34).

The ongoing decline in the 10-year TIPS yield has been suggesting ongoing upside risk to our gold price forecasts, which were based on the view that yields would move back closer to 2.00% as the economy emerged from recession. However, with the US Federal Reserve expected to keep its short-term interest rate target near zero through 2011, with US inflation expected to remain low and with 10-year nominal US Treasury bond-yields expected to range from 3.00%-3.25% in 2010 and only reach 4.00% in 4Q2011, we now expect that US real interest rates will remain near current levels at least through the first half of 2010 (Exhibit 35). With current US 10-year TIPS yields near 1.10%, this would imply a medium-term gold price of $1350/toz, if Central Bank sales were strong enough to offset investment demand (Exhibit 36). However, we expect that the buying from the gold-ETFs will continue to outweigh Central Bank selling over the next two years, leading us to expect gold prices to move even higher.

An earlier than expected tightening of US monetary policy presents a substantial downside risk to gold prices in 2010 and 2011

While movements in US real interest rates have dominated US dollar-denominated gold price movements in recent months, the increasing gap between current gold prices and the long-run average inflation-adjusted price of gold requires one to think about how the price of gold will converge to its long-horizon equilibrium when the US real interest rate environment begins to normalize. More specifically, the long-run inflation-adjusted price of gold is roughly 420 USD/toz in today’s prices (Exhibit 37). To return to this equilibrium, either US inflation must rise dramatically – a three-fold increase in US consumer prices – or we must expect a sharp decline in nominal gold prices when US real interest rates rise back toward more normal levels. Given our US Economics teams view that US inflation will likely remain subdued, falling to a rate of only 0.3% in 2011, this convergence must come from falling nominal gold prices.

Consequently, the key question for the gold investor becomes when will US real interest rates rise, pushing gold prices back towards their long-run average levels? In our view, US real interest rates will rise when US economic recovery strengthens and the US Federal Reserve begins to tighten US monetary policy, raising its short-term nominal interest rate target. The last gold price spike in the early 1980s ended as the dramatic tightening of US monetary policy under Chairman Paul Volcker drove US real interest rates dramatically higher and drove gold prices down substantially (Exhibit 38).

In the interim, the balance between investor buying and central bank sales suggests that the balance of gold price risk remains skewed to the upside

Buying by the gold-ETFs surged during the first four months of 2009 by 13 million toz, far outpacing the total 2008 total of 8 million toz (Exhibit 39). Since this initial surge, ETFs inventories have remained stable and we expect ETF buying to revert to its long-term pace of 6 million toz per year. However, we see upside risk to this assumption. Over the past decade total overall gold investment demand, including bar hoarding, coins and gold-ETFs, has averaged 11 million toz per year. Given the growing size and popularity of gold ETFs, they now represent a larger portion of this total investment demand suggesting a potential shift higher in investment flows. Should the buying from gold-ETFs continue at this faster pace of 11 million toz per year, we would expect gold prices to rise to $1,400 /toz by the end of 2010 and over $1,550/toz by the end of 2011.

Although central banks have historically been net sellers of gold, we have witnessed a significant slowdown in the pace of sales since 2008 with the latest data suggesting an outright halt in aggregate sales. Compared to the late 1990s when many central banks viewed gold as a low-yielding asset and their gold sales put downward pressure on gold prices, the more recent movement among central banks is to view gold reserves as an important source of diversification away from the US dollar in their reserve holdings.

Furthermore, emerging market central banks have explicitly stated their intentions to gradually diversify reserves into gold as well as currency reserve assets other than the US dollar. From a positioning point of view, Asian nations as a group hold only a small percentage of their reserves in gold vs. the major European nations holding more than half their assets in gold (56% as of October). China, for example, holds only about 1.49% of its reserve assets in gold and surprised earlier this year when it announced that it had increased its gold holdings by 76% since 2003 to 1,054 tons, mostly from buying from their domestic mine production. Similarly, only 4.7% of Russia’s reserves are in gold and it has stated its intention to increase its gold holdings and has done so by 19% this year alone. Furthermore, the recent announcement that India was to purchase 200 tons of the 403 tons of gold the IMF plans to sell has substantially reduced the outlook for central bank sales in 2010 and 2011. Net, we expect selling by central banks and other official sector institutions to remain near subdued, less than 100 tonnes per year on net (0.25 million toz per month, Exhibit 40). Should Central Banks continue to be net buyers of gold in the next two years, the upside risk to gold prices would be considerable.

With gold-ETF expected to buy 0.25 million toz per month more than the central banks sell on net and with US real interest rates expected to remain depressed near current levels at least through the first half of 2010, we raise our gold price forecasts to $1200/toz, $1260/toz, and $1350/toz on a 3-, 6-, and 12-month horizon, respectively, with a 2010 average price forecast of $1265/toz and a 2011 average price forecast of $1425/toz (Exhibit 41). While this represents a 12% move to the upside in the next 12 months and a 20% move to the upside in the next 24 months, the last time US real interest rates declined to these low levels on a sustained basis was in the late 1970s, gold prices spiked to $1870/toz in today’s US dollars in January of 1980. While we view an earlier than expected tightening of monetary policy by the US Federal Reserve as the primary downside risk to gold prices in 2010 and 2011, we see the balance of risks as remaining skewed to the upside.

Full report:


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Hondo's picture

They have a poor track record at predicting, especially commodities.

Cow's picture

Didn't GS call Gold at $1200 for 12/09?  Not too shabby.

qrs521's picture

Women in summer would like to become beautiful. Everything can grab other's eyes is their best friends.Products make them beauty and confident is their favourite. Look in the street,you can see many different types of make up to show women's personality.

Welcome to the shop, the following is our products, free shipping.

Soccer Shoes Cheap Soccer Shoes Nike Soccer Shoes Adidas Soccer Shoes Nike Soccer Shoes sale Adidas Soccer Shoes sale UGG UGGs UGG Boot UGG Boots UGG Boots Sale Cheap UGG Boots UGG Boots Cheap Women UGG boots ugg boots cardy ugg cardy boots Timberland Timberland sale Timberland boots Timberland boots online Timberland on sale New timberland boots UGG UGG boots UGG boots sale UGG boots short Short ugg Short ugg boots Ugg boots tall Nike Air Nike Air Max Nike Air Max Shoes Nike SB Nike Dunk Nike Dunk SB Nike Dunk SB Shoes Nike Shox Nike Shox Shoes Women Bags Women Bags Sale Women Handbags Women Handbags Sale Women New Bags Cheap Bags Cheap Bags On Sale New women bags New women bags sale New women bags sale online Louis Vuitton Handbags Gucci bags Nike Nike Shoes Nike Shoes Sale Nike running Nike running shoes Nike trainers Nike trainers shoes Timberland Timberland boots Timberland boots sale Timberland boot Timberland boot sale Timberland boots cheap Men timberlands MBT MBT Shoes MBT Chapa GTX MBT Men Shoes MBT Women Shoes Discount MBT Shoes LV Handbags Gucci Handbags Chanel Handbags Chloe Handbags D&G Handbags Dior Handbags Fendi Handbags Hermes Handbags Jimmy Choo Bags Marc Jacobs Bags Miu Miu Handbags Mulberry Bags Prada Handbags Versace Handbags Yves Saint Laurent Balenciaga Bags Burberry Handbags LV Handbags Gucci Handbags Chanel Handbags Chloe Handbags D&G Handbags Dior Handbags Fendi Handbags Hermes Handbags Jimmy Choo Bags Marc Jacobs Bags Miu Miu Handbags Mulberry Bags Prada Handbags Versace Handbags Yves Saint Laurent Balenciaga Bags Burberry Handbags

Those who want to become most beautiful in the world should try them. Just ones can make you different. Girls who want to grab your boyfriends's heart is necessary to use them.

Careless Whisper's picture

@Hondo    Do any professional traders or hedge fund managers actually make trades/investments based on GoniffSachs research?

Seems to me someone at Zero is wasting a lot of keystokes and vaulable web space re-publishing this garbage.

Unscarred's picture

Are you suggesting that Goldman is trying to help nugde this rally so that they may sell into it?

AnonymousMonetarist's picture

What if the Black Swan is just, hope upon hope, muddling through?

Never fast enough with the mute button after Santelli comes on CNBC, I caught one of the canuckleheads on Hee-Haw muse that golly gee willikers maybe we have to destroy the currency in order to create jobs! Destroy your standard of living to improve it? Nancy Capitalists in a Sovereign Democracy that are hell bent to seek rent.

AnonymousMonetarist's picture


Here's a nugget from Taleb:


A few researchers have examined the work and attitude of security analysts, with amazing results, particularly when one considers the epistemic arrogance of these operators. In a study comparing them with weather forecasters, Tadeusz Tyszka and Piotr Zielonka document that the analysts are worse at predicting, while having a greater faith in their own skills. Somehow, the analysts’ self-evaluation did not decrease their error margin after their failures to forecast.

Last June I bemoaned the dearth of such published studies to Jean-Philippe Bouchaud … one of those quantitative scientists who apply methods of statistical physics to economic variables, a field that was started by Benoit Mandelbrot in the late 1950s … Unlike economists who wear suits and spin theories, they use empirical methods to observe the data and do not use the bell curve.

He surprised me with a research paper that a summer intern had just finished under his supervision and that had just been accepted for publication; it scrutinized two thousand predictions by security analysts. What it showed was that these brokerage-house analysts predicted nothing—a naïve forecast made by someone who takes the figures from one period as predictors of the next would not do markedly worse. Yet analysts are informed about companies’ orders, forthcoming contracts, and planned expenditures, so this advanced knowledge should help them do considerably better than a naïve forecaster looking at the past data without further information. Worse yet, the forecasters’ errors were significantly larger than the average difference between individual forecasts, which indicates herding. Normally, forecasts should be as far from one another as they are from the predicted number. But to understand how they manage to stay in business, and why they don’t develop severe nervous breakdowns (with weight loss, erratic behavior, or acute alcoholism), we must look at the work of the psychologist Philip Tetlock.

There are those people who produce forecasts uncritically. When asked why they forecast, they answer, “Well that’s what we’re paid to do here.”



My suggestion: get another job.

This suggestion is not too demanding: unless you are a slave, I assume you have some amount of control over your job selection. Otherwise this becomes a problem of ethics, and a grave one at that. People who are trapped in their jobs who forecast simply because “that’s my job,” knowing pretty well that their forecast is ineffectual, are not what I would call ethical. What they do is no different from repeating lies simply because “it’s my job.”

Anyone who causes harm by forecasting should be treated as either a fool or a liar. Some forecasters cause more damage to society than criminals. Please, don’t drive a school bus blindfolded.



Ivanovich's picture

Was this before or after Blankfein said "We're not bullish on gold."?

etrader's picture

Thanks as usual for the full notes !

B9K9's picture

That's all? Why no mention that the price of gold will simply increase in proportion to currency devaluation?

Sigh, this is all becoming rather mundane. Many ZH space monkeys seem to possess righteous indignation about our current situation, as if corruption & manipulation has just occurred over the last 10-20 years.

Look, boys & girls, the fight between stable & inflationary money systems is as old as the ages. Murry Rothbard wrote an excellent primer on this subject years ago. You can download/read from here:

While Rothbard argues against the Fed, others might take away the knowledge that the inflationists won. That means that the current debt overhang (which, of course are assets held by savers) needs to be reduced in proportion to income (ie the carrying ratio that Denninger constantly blathers on about) so that another credit induced inflationary cycle can be launched.

To achieve the necessary debt reduction/reset, one can either default and/or devalue. Either way, savers must get hosed. Guess which course was selected? So, if you're a saver, get out of currency.

Stable or inflationary money policy - which group is in power? That's all you need to know. We'll never see (widespread) deflation unless we have a change in political control. If not, then don't be surprised to see the dollar lose another 80%.

AnonymousMonetarist's picture

Those that fail to stand for something will fall for anything. 

B9K9's picture

Then go right ahead and make a stand. As for myself, I happen to suscribe to the Malibu surfer theory of life. Maximize personal enjoyment while profiting from society's never-ending quest for "solutions".

AnonymousMonetarist's picture

Have the luxury of exceeding or meeting my personal expectations.

Not worried about my kids.

Padmé: [to Bail Organa] So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause...


Gordon_Gekko's picture

Increasingly, I am beginning to subscribe to that theory. It appears to be the most optimal strategy to lead life and I think it also relates very nicely to the concept of zen.

Missing_Link's picture

I don't see the point in picking one or the other.  There's no reason not to enjoy life and get rich while also fighting to reform the system.  Just avoid destroying the economy while getting rich, and avoid destroying yourself while encouraging reform.

B9K9's picture

From the preface:

The drumfire of propaganda that the Fed is manning the ramparts against the menace of inflation brought about by others is nothing less than a deceptive shell game. The culprit solely responsible for inflation, the Federal Reserve, is continually engaged in raising a hue-and-cry about "inflation," for which virtually everyone else in society seems to be responsible. What we are seeing is the old ploy by the robber who starts shouting "Stop, thief!" and runs down the street pointing ahead at others. We begin to see why it has always been important for the Fed, and for other Central Banks, to invest themselves with an aura of solemnity and mystery For, as we shall see more fully, if the public knew what was going on, if it was able to rip open the curtain covering the inscrutable Wizard of Oz, it would soon discover that the Fed, far from being the indispensable solution to the problem of inflation, is itself the heart and cause of the problem.

WaterWings's picture

Good stuff.

Inflationists win, savers get hosed. Rinse, repeat. You're right, nothing new.

¡Viva la Revolucion!

Anonymous's picture

Excellent. (Or not, since it looks like there is only one way this thing can go).

Till now I considered a deflationary spiral the only possible outcome. But hosing savers seems to be ever more clearly the route the FED has decided to follow.

What's ironic is that of all people, Barney Frank was a co-sponsor of a more open FED and now has switched 180 degrees stalling and lying his ass off. What he must now know is that if the truth ever comes out about the FED, officially,
it would be abolished and EVERY politician who ever supported it would lose their jobs, be recalled for the damage they have done singularly to the Middle classes.

Shameful's picture

If gold/commodities only hit those prices I will be out of my mind happy.  No chance those figures are right unless the Fed breaks the printing press and can't drown the world in dollars.

Anonymous's picture

If I owned gold or gold etf or stocks I would sell them today RIGHT NOW!

Brak82's picture

i would buy them from you RIGHT NOW.

SilverIsKing's picture

But since you've admitted that you don't own them, you've exposed the fact that your investing prowess is quite poor.

Cow's picture

If you were smart enough to have earned enough to own gold, or gold etf or stocks, you wouldn't make such inane statements.

Unscarred's picture

@Anonymous - You just got owned by a Cow.

Anonymous's picture

While I agree your statement may hold water with a newbie I am an old-timer. Stocks and metals can be fun to play with I have found that buying things they do not make anymore make you more money. Think T206 Wagner, 1909s vdb, bought 25 years ago. Now check these gains to yours.

Gordon_Gekko's picture

Which is precisely why you don't have the fortune of owning them right now.

Anonymous's picture

All that bullshit analysis and they don't know that the next decade starts in 2011 not 2010?

PWD Lover's picture

Sold some GLD this morning; still have the vast majority of my meager net worth in PMs. I'll probably hate myself, but for now, in the wake of GS's gold-pimpin', I feel a little better about taking some profits. In for good since the $400s.

jm's picture

Don't forget Goldman's "peak oil" $200 barrel call pretty much ended the party.


Anonymous's picture

Nice! Thanks for reminding. First they called $30 oil, then a few months later they called $200 oil, then it was over.

Anonymous's picture

the comex. the next madoff type scam in progress.

if you have GLD, sell it and get out of it soon.

Anonymous's picture

Why have you disabled the download function for this report on scribd?

Hammer59's picture

...A billion people from the emerging markets rising into the ranks of the Middle Class in the next decade. Sorry GS, not gonna happen. People with money are hoarding it, not investing it--bye, bye growth. People without money are desperate--hello, civil unrest, crime and violence. I-pods, 400 dollar i-phones, x-box etc. will follow Prada handbags into the dust bin of history. The world collectively collapses under the weight of 6 billion people and their hubris.

Anonymous's picture

They can hoard cash all they want, but if the purchasing power of that money declines it is not going to mean anything.

Anonymous's picture

Please pose the GS report in its entirety. Thank you.

johngaltfla's picture

As I said yesterday on my blog, a 10-15% correction from here would be healthy and expected. They have to try one more time to save the American Peso before it dies once and for all.

luckylee's picture

Buying ETFs are for trading vehicle only. Physical gold - the real deal.

Anonymous's picture

why is this unprintable?

Anonymous's picture

If you have MORE gold than anyone, then you WANT the price to go up...and the USA has more gold than anyone. The King wants the price of gold to rise because it strengthens him and weakens the peasants... the run up is intentional but they have to act like they don't want it or the peasants will revolt.

Grand Supercycle's picture


The Dollar rally is getting closer (when the Dow resumes it's downtrend)

Anonymous's picture

The trouble is the us Goverment Gold is all fake, tungsten filled.