This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Goodbye David Sokol

Tyler Durden's picture



And next, David Sokol takes down Charlie Munger.

From Reuters:

Hathaway on Wednesday said David Sokol misled the company in the way he
disclosed his financial interest in Lubrizol Corp before pushing
Berkshire CEO Warren Buffett to buy it.

Berkshire said in a statement
its audit committee was still considering the possibility of legal
action against Sokol as a result of his behavior and that it would
cooperate with any government investigation.

We are not sure how the massive report released jives with the Oracular's once pathetic disclaimer: "Therefore, if questioned about this matter in the future, I will simply refer the questioner back to this release."


Full BRK report (link):

Apr 2711


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:04 | 1213295 Double down
Double down's picture

The day is just full of good news.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:04 | 1213311 Alienated Serf
Alienated Serf's picture

interesting, i thought it was the bernank who ordered the birth cert. released today. must have been uncle warren.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:11 | 1213333 Hedgetard55
Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:52 | 1213575 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

Not specifically about the birther thing....
Word to the wise: Be very careful about following what Denninger says. Especially when it comes to investing, moneyness and the law. He supports the system (that works against you) with such a blind faith that it will eventually be his undoing. Denninger does try and indeed hits some good things now and then, yet he is off the mark on the very large picture. This is normal as micromanagers get the large picture wrong all the time, so they hire independent consultant(s) who easily see the problem. Again, Denninger hits on some good things, yet has major problems on a large scale basis.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:06 | 1213647 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Obama's social security number is bogus as well. It was assigned to a Connecticut woman who was born in 1890.


Much more in this:

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:51 | 1213813 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture

socialist security did not exist in 1890. 

you got junked for that.

i you were being sarcastic (i doubt it), you need to indicate it. 

otherwise one's iq shows.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:02 | 1213840 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

No, but someone born in 1890 would've signed up after it was created.

Now, please junk yourself, and make amends.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:15 | 1213875 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

ol' Tony can't spell, but can't do math either.  newbie half life < 6 weeks. - Ned

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 19:24 | 1214107 FrankDrakman
FrankDrakman's picture


Socialist security was introduced in the 1930's, when said woman would be in her 40's. do you think they only issued SS numbers to newborns?

I'm not commenting on whether Bambam's SS number is real or not; I have no freakin' clue. I'm just saying your argument is full of it.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 20:49 | 1214378 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture

correct.  it is all shit.  subject is socialist security. yeah, what a shit for freedom arguement.

goverment is daddy and you can't be a big boy (or girl).  so daddy protects you.  but daddy has bankers he owes money to.  so you see daddy's eventually protecting you soooo damn well that you can't do anything without a permit or license for permission from daddy.  you don't own your car, you have a certificate of title because daddy state owns it.  now the push is on to destroy our property rights with fraudclosure.  and to think it all took a major hold on america back with fdr and socialist security...

socialist security - unconstitutional - end of arguement.

congress was supposed to meet "at least one a year".  WHY DO THEY NEVER GO HOME!  Could it be that are busy creating benefits for us that fuck us over?  yeah, that could well be.

time to go for a redress of grievances.

read the Constitution.  it is our duty.

a republic, if you can keep it.


Wed, 04/27/2011 - 22:01 | 1214577 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

Social Security #s are recycled (for some idiotic, bureaucratic reason!)

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:42 | 1213517 riley martini
riley martini's picture

 I took a long time for them to age the paper to make it look authenic. Acording to Bloomturd it's humiliating to have to show your birth cert. Funny I have always found it a simple non-event that takes about a minute.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:55 | 1213580 Dr. Richard Head
Dr. Richard Head's picture

No shit.  It is pretty much required for every forced permission to drive I have to seek.  WTF?

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:16 | 1213879 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

"that takes about a minute."

how do you make it last that long? - Ned

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 20:40 | 1214332 Hot Shakedown
Hot Shakedown's picture

Laughing my ass off; I can see old warren scratching is head with a bewildered "Mr Magoo" look of disbelief..what? ... What.. .? ..ahhhhh what? ....what ?

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:03 | 1213300 Popo
Popo's picture

>  "and next he takes down Charlie Munger..."

... or the old man himself.  Don't tell me Buffett's not knee deep in crooked deals.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:30 | 1213437 Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

Sokol is know as the "Fall Guy"... the Victim... Somebody has to go down when the time comes...

And it ain't going to be Uncle "Geritol" Warren...

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:54 | 1213817 Andy Lewis
Andy Lewis's picture

Hey Charley baby, suck this up.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:35 | 1213935 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

Buffett always has a Buffer

Thu, 04/28/2011 - 01:24 | 1214864 i-dog
i-dog's picture

"Don't tell me Buffett's not knee deep in crooked deals."

According to Alice Schroeder, author of 'The Snowball' (Buffett's authorised biography), he was really pissed the day after 9-11 when he found out that his wholly-owned reinsurance arm (General Re) hadn't unloaded their terrorism exposure to the WTC before 9-11 ... because he had specifically told them to unload the WTC about a year before 9-11 and they had not done it!!

Oh, wait ... I guess he is just prescient........ (@17:30)

(FWIW, and from what I've been able to find so far, planning for 9-11 seems to have started around mid-1998).

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:05 | 1213303 Cleanclog
Cleanclog's picture

But was he born in the USA?

Crazy nutty world.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:04 | 1213312 SunBlaster
SunBlaster's picture

All that trouble for $6m?!

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:32 | 1213453 Fake Jim Quinn
Fake Jim Quinn's picture

For a lot less! Remember the after hours mutual fund trading scandal? Multimillionaires getting trashed for making a few hundred grand. These people love money and so even if one of 'em is worth hundreds of millions, a few extra million is a lot of money and skimming it as often as they do adds up. What if Sokol did this a few times already. Pretty soon you'd have a lot more than $6M, maybe 3x that -- and that's alot for anyone.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 19:10 | 1214044 Judge Holden
Judge Holden's picture

This is absolutely true.  This just shows how rotten the system is to the core.  Which is more likely: (1) that Sokol made one illegal trade to make a few million on top of his billions, or (2) that he made his billions by doing this type of bullshit all the time without getting caught before now?


From the Bloomberg story, "Buffett learned of Citigroup’s role introducing Sokol to Lubrizol only when a representative from the bank called to congratulate him on the deal, according to the report." So in other words, Buffett came very close to never finding out about this deal.  I wonder how many other situations were like that?

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 20:26 | 1214289 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Wasn't this the third time Sokol did this and every time Buffett gave him a pass.  Buffett gave him a pass on this one until it got worse.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:05 | 1213314 israhole
israhole's picture

I thought you're  supposed to go to prison for this.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 19:34 | 1214128 Judge Holden
Judge Holden's picture

That whole "rule of law" thing is nice in theory.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:07 | 1213315 LongSoupLine
LongSoupLine's picture

suck it up Munger, you fuck.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:08 | 1213320 crosey
crosey's picture

We'll see how long the "nobility" remains "noble" in their reaction and retribution.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:36 | 1213941 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

Retribution?  Google "Elizabeth Monrad".

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:09 | 1213326 Joe Davola
Joe Davola's picture

What kind of tread prints does that Berkshire bus leave?

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:11 | 1213331 digalert
digalert's picture

CNBS Becky Quick reporting live from the Buffet massage parlor.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:44 | 1213519 ZippyBananaPants
ZippyBananaPants's picture

Not able to talk now because she has Warren's balls in her mouth.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:09 | 1213337 Cone of Uncertainty
Cone of Uncertainty's picture

WTF took them so long.

This guy is a smegma lick.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:35 | 1213470 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

i think you just dissed smegma

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:13 | 1213341 gkm
gkm's picture

The Bernanke may have to bail BRK from all the attorney fees they`re about to incur.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:16 | 1213356 duncecap rack
duncecap rack's picture

Well, duh.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:17 | 1213362 Re-Discovery
Re-Discovery's picture

Should've bought silver (I couldn't help myself.)

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:20 | 1213378 tmosley
tmosley's picture

I'm sure you couldn't, with that hand up your ass.

Being a sock puppet, registered 2 weeks and 1 day ago, and already talking trash about silver, right off the bat.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:15 | 1213678 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

You dont own any south of $30. Jackass.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:36 | 1213734 Re-Discovery
Re-Discovery's picture

Stick and stones may break my bones, but you'll never kill my silver position.

Started in SLV at 21.37 (want the ticket?)  Now mostly physical.  Yeah, I just started posting.  I mean, why waste good trades on knuckleheads like you.  And I share my trading thoughts, unlike bashers like you who just show up when you're right. Read me.  Maybe I'll make you a few bucks (naaah, I'd rather you just stay my bitch on the other side of the trade.)

Most longer term posters are more friendly and . . .well . . .intelligent.  But you can't say they all haven't tried to enlighten you.  I do not envy your 'posting length' so don't envy my PM length.  Or the length of other things I have.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:38 | 1213757 Re-Discovery
Re-Discovery's picture

and I almost forgot.  Fuck off.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:18 | 1213886 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

telling yourself to fuck off?  lovin' it! - Ned

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:36 | 1213904 Re-Discovery
Re-Discovery's picture

How can you really get in touch with reality if you can't tell yourself to Fuck Off every once in a while.  Try it with me "Ned, Fuck Off .. Ned Fuck Off . .Ned Fuck Off."  Now, don't you feel better.  I know I do.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 21:10 | 1214442 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

tell yourself to fuck off until you feel better.  rinse and repeat. - Ned

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 22:47 | 1214679 Re-Discovery
Re-Discovery's picture

Very original, Ned.  Keep up the valuable posts.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:24 | 1213405 Ese Pinche
Ese Pinche's picture

Welcome to the forum... you have almost been initiated.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:26 | 1213705 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

moseley's new poodle. go fuck off

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:16 | 1213366 Cdad
Cdad's picture

Munger Take-down party at Dog's house!  Woot!!

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:16 | 1213368 Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Really, the casual way in which Buffett handled the Sokol affair is a real joke.   Now, they'll eat each other alive.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:19 | 1213375 AG BCN
AG BCN's picture

Will this stop Munger banging on about BYD?

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:19 | 1213387 riffraffy
riffraffy's picture

Bus, meet David Sokol. David Sokol, meet bus.

Now, get under get under it, before you are thrown there.

Oh, too late...

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:29 | 1213445 Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

Sokol: Let go of Charlie while we are shoving you under the bus...

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:23 | 1213391 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

So will this asshole go to jail and be left penniless?


Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:37 | 1213478 Calculated_Risk
Calculated_Risk's picture

He's in line for Turbo timmy's spot. Jail is for the little people.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:28 | 1213403 Threeggg
Threeggg's picture

What is this from Bullionvault regarding a withdraw declaration note of many tonnages of Silver ?

I am a little slow based on my captcha record. Can someone explain this ?


Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:26 | 1213412 Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

Good-bye Munger
Suck it up, Charlie...

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:06 | 1213634 treemagnet
treemagnet's picture


Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:40 | 1213758 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

The new phrase is "Bellow Your Diaphragm, Charlie!"

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:26 | 1213430 riley martini
riley martini's picture

 If  the (Fascist of Omaha)Warren Buffet was half as honest as Charlie Munger, Buffet wold be twice as hated. Most People will believe a big lie over a little lie every time .

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:29 | 1213434 doubleplusgood
doubleplusgood's picture

Buffett, that eugenics globalist, is going to the same place lucifer will end up.

Amazing how they dress up that sociopathic scumbag into some sort of folksy man of the people.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:34 | 1213461 Josh Randall
Josh Randall's picture

Lets see if he is so distressed he takes to doing something rash, like 86'ing himself with a thousand stabs to the back, after he's already poisoned and hung himself...or he may turn State's evidence

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:32 | 1213464 riley martini
riley martini's picture

 Sokol has to have alot dirt on those Fascist criminals at Berkshire .  You know they already have deal for Sokol to keep his mouth shut about selected criminal activity . Since the fascist at Berkshire are exempt from prosecution with a direct line to the White House Maybe they would't even bother.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:35 | 1213737 WonderDawg
WonderDawg's picture

I think you're probably right. He won't go to jail, and he'll be well taken care of to keep his mouth shut. He's the fall guy, and probably willing and well-paid-off.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:39 | 1213490 equity_momo
equity_momo's picture

I dont give a flying fuck about Sokol. Just let me know when that corrupt old fuck himself gets his dues.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:07 | 1213650 treemagnet
treemagnet's picture

Becky must be nervous....something tells me she's uttered "Oh! - Uncle Warren!" once or twice.....

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:39 | 1213492 web bot
web bot's picture

It will be amusing to see how Mr. Suckitup deals with this.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:45 | 1213522 rockraider3
rockraider3's picture

Maybe Munger will go back to the business that bears his name: Munger, Tolles & Olson.  Then again, the firm wouldn't want the publicity.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:50 | 1213557 HEHEHE
HEHEHE's picture

But Buffet said he didn't think Sokol did anything wrong?

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:38 | 1213748 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

I'm sitting here wondering if his letter makes him culpable in any way? (not that it will matter, of course)

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:51 | 1213571 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

Imagine lawyers "just a press release."

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 16:57 | 1213594 honestann
honestann's picture

Sokol is just below the cutoff line.  You know:

Too big to fail.
Too rich to fial.
Too famous to fail.
Too connected to fail.
Knows too much to fail.

His bosses are definitely "too [all the above] to fail".

Of course, Sokol didn't "fail".  He remains rich and free.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:28 | 1213922 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture

great outline!

like i always have said - no real convictions, just an escape goat once in a while like madoff. 

attention : rule of Statutory Law is NOT ! 

attention : Common Law must now preside !

attention : Common Law is based on property and rights.

Yes, that is why they say that Common Law does not exist.  If that was the case, then all property rights are completely gone.  Nobody owns anything but the STATE (read: CORPORATION).  the facist police state.

For fuck's sake people, let's get a grip on this bitch asap as it isn't that complicated.  i'm doing my part.  i was in two court buildings today.  i am most often mistaken for an attorney, and get told to bypass security.

i know that's another trap though.  once i'm in, only those security persons know the wiser.  amazing how far one can walk into a courthouse dressed as they dress.

today's war on my end was great.  got a few things done.

1 - filed objection into fraudclosure case.

2 - had a bailiff mistake me for an attorney and he ran to personally deliver my letter warning the judge about the magistrate.

3 - drop by the law firm and hand them the filing.  (i love that)


rinse, new filings for tommorrow, repeat.

they will learn Common Law is real and has standing or they will literally have to kill me.  great people died to found this great country and i will not sit idly by as liberties are stripped.

f^ck you, i have no need for your governance, i can manage my own affairs.  so you do not say what i can or can't do.

i seem to recall monty pylon having it something like -

i burst my pimples at you.

i blow my nose in your general direction.

learning is fun!

silver bullets and shields bitchez !

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 19:05 | 1214019 honestann
honestann's picture

Yeah, you are one of the few heros.  You probably know about a friend of mine (Rob Menard) who is trying to make headway in Canada along similar lines.

The core understanding is the most important.  You know.  Like understanding that all organizations including "government" and "corporations" are fictions... and therefore literally and lawfully do not exist.  Hell, that's why the most fundamental and oldest law calls them "fictitious entities" for anyone and everyone to see.

Which is why no human has any right to take any action on behalf of "government" that is not ethical to take on behalf of an individual man (woman included in that term).

Which is why "consent to be governed" is required to be subject to any act or statute or regulation.  And by the way, in case it isn't obvious yet, I do not consent to be governed by anyone or anything, real or fiction.

My only worry with the "common law" approach is possible [ancient] baggage it might carry.  Sure, I agree that the core notions that "to harm or destroy a human or his property, or fail to comply with contracts" is unethical.  How can anyone dispute that core idea that is commonly associated with "common law".  However (not being a history buff or well-read history wise), I have a feeling that "common law" was something "granted" by some self-proclaimed "king" or "royalty" a long time ago.  I reject any and every notion of royalty, or of anyone who came before me having any authority over me (or you).

So I worry a bit about invoking "common law" for these reasons, even though what you understand as "common law" is infinitely more honest, ethical and rational than anything practiced today anywhere on earth.

I prefer to invoke reality... the real nature of reality and the nature of modern man (as producer, not predator).  That plus the obvious simple logically consistent fact that no man can be somehow born with authority over any other man (since they are equivalent in every significant respect).  Thus, without contract between me and someone else, I have zero obligation to comply with their wishes or demands or acts or statutes or regulations, or to pay their so-called fees and taxes.  Period.  End of story as far as I'm concerned.

I worry that good folks like you accidentally get sullied by dealing with predator-scumbags like those in the so-called "legal society" AKA "legal system"... or start to believe that anything they do is legitimate.  None of what they say or do is legitimate, because none of it is voluntary.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 21:02 | 1214417 lilimarlene1
lilimarlene1's picture

A darling friend alerted me to this! Thanks, nurse!

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 21:23 | 1214486 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture

thank you.  that was classic! 

first truth is ridiculed, then vehemently opposed to be finally concluded as the truth all along.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 21:16 | 1214460 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture

oh yes, truth is feared in bank-owned-courts.

the most interesting thing my collegues and i notice is they sell our counterclaims on the market within a day of being filed.  they even hedge them.  lol.  that proves to us what you mention of the fact of the fiction in legal-land.  kind of like - create a story with evidence and we'll sell it and bet on it.

exploring the rabbit hole is very time consuming.  however, the farther i go, the closer i feel to our founding fathers.

our founding fathers would have LOVED to have the internet!  things would have moved in weeks not years.  so i ask wtf is keeping us back?  is there not more of us, even just the few enlightened, than there is of them?  i believe so.

peeps need to understand we are all sovereigns, but the majority of us have been subject to a contract (remember the Consitution says we have unlimited right to contract) we were not told about.

that is the hook that hangs us.  i took myself off that damn hook.  i am busy, but now i feel the stress relieves itself as you fight for truth and justice.

yes, it is EXTREMELY HARD to avoid the use of Facist Retard Notes.  But the point is it can be done.  Don't tell me no way because America lasted with tiny bouts of inflation all the way until the bankers took control of the currency for good.

keep a silver eagle (or your 1 ounce coin of choice) in your pocket as a constant reminder you are worth more than the entire paper ponzi facade played before you in full fictional realism complete with smoke, mirrors and a bonus dog and pony show.

you can't see the picture if you're in the picture.

evil triumphs when good men do nothing.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 22:31 | 1214644 honestann
honestann's picture

Yeah, I totally agree about FRNs [and pretty much everything you say].

Personally I've had 98% to 100% of my savings in gold and silver for the last few years.

About 3 years ago I started an experiment to see how much of what I need and want to buy I could buy with 1oz gold and silver bars.  At the start it was a bit difficult and my first few months came in at about 27% of products I could buy with the physical gold or silver bars I had (pamp).  Over time that increased and recently has reached 96%.  Note that at all times I refused to "pay more" for anything just so I could pay with gold or silver (that would have been a "cheat").

So yeah, we definitely can do without FRNs... and I am.  I wish everybody lived this way.  That would be the end of FRNs.  No need to end the federal reserve or get any "laws" passed.  Unfortunately, humans are dumber than rocks today.

Question:  What form does that "selling counterclaims on the market within one day" take?  Is there visible paperwork involved that you can prove the courts and "legal societies" are simply predatory corporations [beyond a reasonable doubt, to regular dimwit folks]?

Keep up the good work!

Thu, 04/28/2011 - 00:51 | 1214876 1fortheroad
1fortheroad's picture

I,ll take a stab. Courts are now for profit. Every claim and counterclaim requires a bond.

The bonds are what is sold on the market. Im still doing more reashearch on this.


Thu, 04/28/2011 - 20:11 | 1218475 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture

hi 1fortheroad, you have stabbed it spot on.  yes every claim or counterclaim has a bond associated with it.  also, all the agents of the system have bonds.  that is what you go after when they act in corrupt manners.

ah, the depth of the rabbit hole......

Thu, 04/28/2011 - 11:49 | 1214854 1fortheroad
1fortheroad's picture

another day

Thu, 04/28/2011 - 15:57 | 1217433 honestann
honestann's picture

Tell me your opinion to the approach proposed here:

Do you think the courts will respond (as they're supposedly required to)?  Do you think they'll just deem it "inappropriate" or delay it indefinitely?

And what do you think of the specific questions he wants to have them "clarity"?  Boy, if any court did clarify these things, that would give us a launching pad to attack the predators-that-be.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:03 | 1213603 nontaxpayer
nontaxpayer's picture

Munger, fucking smelly old xxx piece of xxxx, burn in xxxx.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:01 | 1213623 nontaxpayer
nontaxpayer's picture

---my solicitor was getting nervous, hence the xxx's...

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:02 | 1213611 No More Bubbles
No More Bubbles's picture

How about the crooks start getting DECAPITATED?

When the fuck do I get to use my Guillotine?  I've lubed it up and sharpened the blade.  It's time to get busy!

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:18 | 1213681 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

How did he steal from you?

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:04 | 1213636 bania
bania's picture

Goodbye David Sokol.  And hello Berkshire Hathaway stock chart priced in silver since 2006!

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:05 | 1213849 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture


Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:25 | 1213708 kentfinance
kentfinance's picture

making money honestly is hard, which is why so many guys end up just cheating

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:02 | 1213845 FIAT_FixItAgainTony
FIAT_FixItAgainTony's picture

yes.  why?  because we are taught incorrectly.

go to school.  study hard.  get a job.  work real hard.  get two weeks of retirement before your fatal heart attack.

rich are rich because they view living and money differently.

there's a reason for the saying of "it takes money to make money."

if you are already buying physical silver, you are starting on the right path.

it requires a complete change of thought patterns.  stuff we were never taught.

real money is for learned honest people.

let the crooked and shady players suffer with their ill gains.

karma's real and it's a beotch!

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:27 | 1213711 kentfinance
kentfinance's picture

making money honestly is hard, which is why so many guys end up just cheating

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 20:42 | 1214343 Freddie
Freddie's picture


The country is filled with puppets who go to Omaha to hear the old con man.  They thought and still think he is a clean.  Buffett is as crooked as they cum. The true believes will still fawn over him and they think he will make them rich.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:49 | 1213796 Pez
Pez's picture

Sorry Charlie:

The Fed only wants fraudsters that fake good.

Wed, 04/27/2011 - 18:22 | 1213911 unclebill
unclebill's picture

golf applause.....

Thu, 04/28/2011 - 09:27 | 1215507 Man with no name
Man with no name's picture

Just another front running POS. Next up, A-hole Munger.

Thu, 04/28/2011 - 09:35 | 1215551 snowball777
snowball777's picture

<Oracular>Well, David, as you can see, we all drew straws and you got the shortest one, so...</Oracular>

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!