Governments From Around the World ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror

George Washington's picture

Preface: Please skip to the end of this essay (entitled
"Why Should I Care?") if you want to see why this issue is important to
the economy, civil rights, and the political causes which are most
important to you.

Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror:

  • A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that - under orders from the chief of the Gestapo - he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.  Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson
  • The CIA admits
    that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage
    bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its
    democratically-elected prime minister
  • Israel admits
    that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in
    several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left
    behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the
    bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the
    bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
  • As admitted by
    the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the
    1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with
    the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News
    Tonight with Peter Jennings. Official State Department documents show
    that - only nine months before - the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
    and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country
  • The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found
    that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the
    South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked
    him "to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the
    African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the
    investigating officer into the murder incident", thus framing the ANC
    for the bombing
  • An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit
    that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian
    civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author)
  • According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that
    the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and
    blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that
    group listed as a terrorist organization.
  • The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings
  • As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit
    that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and
    pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate
    Macedonian police, in order to join the "war on terror".
  • Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo
    suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having
    “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It
    could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and
    fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and
    claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion
    within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities
    and to question the validity of communications.”
  • United Press International reported in June 2005:

    intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq
    are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have
    had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been
    physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line
    without any serial numbers. Analysts speculate
    that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as
    U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of
    the illegitimacy of the resistance

  • Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers
  • At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence

Why Should I Care?

You may ask yourself "why should I care?"

You should care because terrorism harms the economy. Specifically, a study by Harvard and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) points out:

an economic standpoint, terrorism has been described to have four main
effects (see, e.g., US Congress, Joint Economic Committee, 2002).
First, the capital stock (human and physical) of a country is reduced
as a result of terrorist attacks. Second, the terrorist threat induces
higher levels of uncertainty. Third, terrorism promotes increases in
counter-terrorism expenditures, drawing resources from productive
sectors for use in security. Fourth, terrorism is known to affect
negatively specific industries such as tourism.

The Harvard/NBER concludes:

accordance with the predictions of the model, higher levels of
terrorist risks are associated with lower levels of net foreign direct
investment positions, even after controlling for other types of country
risks. On average, a standard deviation increase in the terrorist risk
is associated with a fall in the net foreign direct investment position
of about 5 percent of GDP.


Terrorism has contributed to a decline in the global economy (for example, European Commission, 2001).

And see this.

In addition, you should care because terror causes governments to strip liberties and civil rights from the people:

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector."
- Plato

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
- U.S. President James Madison

"Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death".
- Adolph Hitler

of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders
of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple
matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ...
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.


easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of
terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal
security is threatened".
- Josef Stalin

the political causes you hold most dear will be derailed if false flag
terror is carried out. To see that this is true, let's take a step back
Imagine, if you would, that you were a citizen in Germany
right after the example of false flag terror by the Nazis discussed
above had occurred. Do you believe you could have stopped the
government from invading Poland by reminding Germans that war is bad
and peace is good? Do you imagine you could have stopped the
brownshirts and loss of domestic rights by writing about the
desirability of civil liberties? Do you think that you could have
convinced people that protecting the environment, or addressing human
or civil rights, or helping the poor, or education, or equality, or any other political crusade was more
important than "protecting the Fatherland" when Germans were terrified
for their safety?

Please think about it.

The German
people were whipped up into a state of hysteria and fear, because they
thought they were under attack by Poles and other "bad guys". The
Germans were in shock, and rallied around their "strong" leader (it
wasn't just the bad economy). Without first exposing the truth that the
attacks were false flag attacks - which were largely the source and root cause
of the German people's fears, and which allowed the German parliament
and other institutions to hand Hitler total power - the sweeping away
of good political causes by the wave of fear could not be stopped.

the Nazis might have been derailed and perhaps brought to justice well
before the Nuremberg trials if the false flag hoaxes had been exposed
at the time. The German people could have been spared from the horrors
inflicted on their nation and the world by the Nazis. And sanity and
positive political changes might have prevailed in 1940's-era Germany.

Please think about it . . .

Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.