You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Greenspan: Worst Financial Crisis EVER, INCLUDING the Great Depression

George Washington's picture




Greenspan just said that the current credit crunch is "by far the greatest financial crisis, globally, ever" -- including the 1930s Great Depression.

Bloomberg notes:

Greenspan
said that while the economy was in worse shape in the Great Depression,
the recent financial crisis was potentially more harmful than that in
the 1930s because “never had short-term credit literally withdrawn.”

Greenspan also said “fiscal affairs are threatening this outlook” for recovery.

As I pointed out last May:

The following experts have said that the economic crisis could be worse than the Great Depression:

Unfortunately, virtually everything the American government has done since the crisis started has been counterproductive. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

The same is true of most other governments.

In
the understatement of the day, Greenspan also called the recovery
"extremely unbalanced," driven largely by high earners benefiting from
recovering stock markets and large corporations.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 06/19/2010 - 02:13 | Link to Comment lumpenprole
lumpenprole's picture

Please, I just hear the same general doom moaning: Too much debt-- we're doomed-- QE--" on and on.

 

Sorry, it's just too easy and the argument "You'll see I'm right"

is not an argument, it's essentially a threat.

 

I had a friend who about four years ago KNEW avian flu would cause chaos and end civilization. If not that, there was ALWAYS something that would do that according to this guy. And then doomsday DIDN'T happen, the prediction was forgotten and the next theory was espoused.

I can do arithmetic, I know the money supply is bigger etc, but show some diligence and attempt to QUANTIFY YOUR ARGUMENTS in numbers and time.  Real science seeks disconfirming information, so specifically say "x" will happen by "y" so you can show you're right,  or be proven wrong. People have been screaming "the end is near" since classical Greece.

If you want to say " Inflation will go crazy," grow a pair and say  "By June 20xx, the money supply will be xxxx and the oil price will be xx, imcreasing food prices by xx % , and transport prices for truckers by xx%,  so the summer of 20xx it will be impossible to keep food in the supermarkets."

 

If you CAN'T  at least make a numeric argument with signposts, then really all you can say is "I'm worried and I don't like xxxxx"

All this "Everything's gone crazy , it's doom!" without quantified, date bound frameworks is just like the damn Chicken Little story.

You do know in the year 1000, doomsday predictions abounded just like in 2000?

They didn't really need them. Things were bad enough in 1000, hahaa...just like already, people are so concerned with American Idol we really need some serious catastrophe to make things worse...

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 11:15 | Link to Comment trav7777
trav7777's picture

This is a worse financial crisis because it is an existential crisis facing the very thing that bankers have spent 500 years peddling - debt.

Running an entire monetary regime on debt only works mathematically as long as it can grow.  Again, it's very important that everyone understands this.

Our currency is backed by a promise to pay in the future plus interest.  Once a deflationary spiral sets in, the math makes the destruction of the money supply via cannibalization from interest servicing needs inevitable.

This is as simple as when someone gets in over their head with credit cards against a level or declining income stream.  If the growth of servicing costs exceeds their growth in income, interest begins to capitalize and eventually consumes their entire personal money supply.

There is no way out of this other than devaluation/default.

Peak oil is the end of the growth and debt era.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 09:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/24/2010 - 09:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/24/2010 - 08:10 | Link to Comment THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

If Greenspan was Japanese he would have done the decent thing a long time ago.

Simply put the man has no honour or shame.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 08:43 | Link to Comment ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

Greed is good, Greed clarifys a predatory culture that kills its own and fouls its own nest. The people who think Seven Generations ahead rather than profit from HFT will take what's left and let Nature heal the wounds.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 07:53 | Link to Comment Observer
Observer's picture

we should 'cashier' all the central banks and central bankers first and return the right to print currency to the treasury departments of elected governments in order for people to be able to hold on to their cash! currencies also have to backed by something of value. paper is not exactly the most valuable commodity. Silver is a good bet as it is a store of value and has industrial uses. we can use various percentages of silver in coins to denote fractional value, today's cents or pence. there is no need for crazy expansion of 'money supply'. Silver and for that matter gold eliminate price instability as their supply is relatively inelastic. Then price rises or decreases will reflect the actual dynamics of the market rather than those of manipulation by the bankers, central or otherwise. relatively constant prices will mean the growth has to be real to register like more people becoming prosperous. If wealth becomes concentrated in a few people it will also show up rather quickly and it is very difficult to manipulate that data,. that is if we still live in a relatively free society.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 11:19 | Link to Comment trav7777
trav7777's picture

Gold and silver are bad ideas.

Gold is in supply decline; it peaked in 2000.

The only solution now - and will be the eventual outcome here - is currency backed by production.  This means Real Bills Doctrine writ large.

Bills could be gold, oil, wheat, anything.  We already have markets which fix the relative prices between these things.  Banks will serve the purpose to discount these bills.

Either way it won't matter.  Until/unless we get fusion solved, we face INEVITABLE sustained global recession.  This is what I said 7 years ago when I first began analyzing outcomes from the oil peak.

Right now we are at the moment of choice where we either let our debtmoney strangle our entire economic system or we simply repudiate.  There is NO future for economies run on debt.  Debt GROWS.  It's built into the math of it.  That is what interest is.  Your obligation grows over time.  The real economy, without additional energy inputs, will NOT be growing.  So how can it backstop debt which is?  Mathematically impossible...

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 01:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/24/2010 - 06:50 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Extend, pretend, loot one more time  . . . and a bigger bubble will burst down the road. See How We Are. That is exactly where we are.  Obama the Janitorial President, 100% owned by Goldman Sachs. But no different from the Bush presidency in that respect. 

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 01:27 | Link to Comment moneymutt
moneymutt's picture

wtf? wasn't he the one saying everything was wonderful a few short years ago....these guys are rich...

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 00:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:49 | Link to Comment Grand Supercycle
Grand Supercycle's picture

 

Alan Greenspan has been judged the economist most responsible for causing the Global Financial Crisis. He, and 2nd and 3rd place finishers Milton Friedman and Larry Summers, have won the first–and hopefully last—Dynamite Prize in Economics.

In awarding the Prize, Edward Fullbrook, editor of the Real World Economics Review, noted that “They have been judged to be the three economists most responsible for the Global Financial Crisis. More figuratively, they are the three economists most responsible for blowing up the global economy.”

http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2010/02/23/greenspan-wins-dynamite-prize-in-economics

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 08:39 | Link to Comment ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

Greenspan should escape to Paraguay before it is too late. Andrea Mitchell can still send him some checks after she pays her makeup artist.

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:10 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

President Obama had to reach back into the campaign to bring back on board David Plouffe, the campaign manager of Obama for America and Obama-Biden 2008, because the administration’s message is in trouble. 

Is it Plouffe who helped push the jobs priority emphasis off the front pages and brought back health care?  An accomplished tactician would obviously suggest that this is a bad time for the Obama Administration to be running on a jobs program when unemployment continues to worsen and nothing is working.  The summit on health care between the president and the Republicans this week was probably Plouffe’s idea. The idea is to put health care all over the networks and front pages and force something, anything, through the Congress to make it look as if the Dems are accomplishing something, and the Republicans are bad.

Had I been Obama’s adviser, that’s what I would have done

But we need to begin with the truth.  And that is that the oligarchs are doing everything they can to turn over all government power into their hands.  They’ll use every trick, every lie, all government authority to reward their friends and take care of their supporters--the financial industry, the healthcare industry, the insurance industry, the corporatists, the illegals, the welfare recipients, the minorities, the public service unions—to accomplish that goal.

They need more power to get everything they want.  But they now are telegraphing their intentions. In other words, it’s no longer hard to see just who Obama is and who his neoliberal and neocon supporters are and what they want.  Fortunately, the American people have gotten their backs up, including a lot of small corporations and small businessmen who stand to get hurt in this.  Government can’t do all these things and still reward Finance, PhRMA, the American Hospital Association, the AMA, Unions, Insurers... There just isn’t enough tax money to go around and the tax- and healthcare-payers--paying more and more for less and less--are going to fight.

It now looks as if the Anthem/WellPoint/Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association decision to raise premiums as much as 39% on its California customers was done totally to help Obama tell his healthcare story—otherwise, why do it just when the parent company has made lots of money, i.e.,  at a difficult time to prove it needed a rate increase?

The Democrats have all these plans, but the word is they’ve telegraphed their intentions, as Econophile and Tyler have so aptly pointed out in every detail.  Obama and Co. simply is looking for money in order to finance its schemes for central control and to pay back Goldman Sachs and all those people who hold the debt.  You can’t count on both hands the number of things this administration has come up with in the past ten days in terms of trial balloons looking for money—cutting Medicare, revenue streaming for 401(k)s and IRAs while telling you that you are "investing" your money in U.S. Treasury bonds when they are going to use your money “immediately to pay for their unprecedented trillion-dollar budget deficits, leaving nothing to back up their political promises, just as they have raided the Social Security trust funds” (as Investors.com put it) and, of course, saving America, i.e., the banks, by Saving With Sheila…

(Reposted from  today’s short-lived (technical difficulties?) contributors’ article by Econophile on Obama’s new Healthcare Plan)

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:49 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

Gs , the proxy now raping multiple countries at once. All Hail Blankputz

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 22:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:59 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

You cannot borrow your way out of debt.

Loans are supposed to be supported by assets.

Lending money to "Frankenbanks" at zero cost, leads to dangerous misallocation and waste of scarce resources.

The nation (perhaps most nations) are being destroyed by stupidity and greed.

If Greenspan had one ounce of honor, he would commit seppuku.  I, and I am sure many others, would gladly be his second.

Greenspan, Bernanke and all the other dangerous money-men seem blissfully unaware of the lives and families they have destroyed.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 01:46 | Link to Comment dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

if you are the reserve currency ... yes you can..  devalue the dollar and pay back the debts... then fuck the world a new one and raise the dollar, because you can.

 

.... well until you can't  but we still got bombs

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 04:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:35 | Link to Comment Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

Worst. Thread. Ever. I will only read it three more times.  Today.

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/24/2010 - 08:36 | Link to Comment ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

Who was Publius in the Federalist Papers? Why was W. Mark Felt using the moniker, "Deep Throat"? Shut up with your useless queries and get to work. "If you don't like the news, go out and make some of your own." (Wesley "Scoop" Nisker, K-SAN  newscaster in late 60's in SF) You have two ears to listen, two ears to hear, but only one mouth for a reason.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 06:24 | Link to Comment jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

it is funny.  especially the way you put it.  imo the actual solution involves time travel and none of us (including the "masters of the universe") has a time machine.  the mistake (deficit spending during an expansion, leaving little ability to run deficits without currency debasement/higher interest rates in a contraction) was made from, generally, the late sixties until 2007 and with a particular vengeance since 1980.  the solutions (as opposed to the critique) generally offered here are, again imo, a hideous combination of politically impossible, economically agonizing and possibly unavoidable, given the wretched box we have been put in (with our own connivance to varying degrees).

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 01:44 | Link to Comment dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

because we are too busy fucking bitches on our piles of gold

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 06:29 | Link to Comment jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

have we no straight, sexually active females with piles of gold?  one would think so. in the trust business i was told that women had more than half the money (and all the pussy).

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 00:01 | Link to Comment seadragonconquerer
seadragonconquerer's picture

It's called a power-structure, you blathering idiot. They're a long time building but, in certain circumstances, they can collapse quickly. See Russia, 1917;  Germany, 1933;  America, 2012.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 00:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:03 | Link to Comment Gimp
Gimp's picture

Really scary part is that you realize that the people in charge do not have a clue on how to fix anything and they are just hoping that time will cure all. 

 

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 00:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/24/2010 - 08:30 | Link to Comment ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

Tomorrow never comes, but death is certain; get over it. "We look at the present through a rear-view mirror. We march backwards into the future." - Marshall McLuhan,The Medium is the Massage, pp. 73-74) 73-74)

 

 

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 20:47 | Link to Comment docj
docj's picture

An arsonist, admiring his handiwork.

Disgraceful.

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 20:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 20:15 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

There is no way he would say this before a catastrophic "collapse".  Look, it goes either way, but hyperinflation would hide the problems for a year or so.  If the doelar goes down (which it will) then gold goes up, economic professors worldwide will say, "So?  Imports will go up."  I always ask, "What imports?"  You can get them by pointing out energy prices (oil) will have a similar effect. 

I say jobs bill happens, hiding the inflation once again with butterflies and unicornsHYPE officially sets in (so it is not just ZHers saying it), and then they have another year to institute their police state.

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 01:42 | Link to Comment dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

don't worry when the dollar goes down our exports go up!!   (and all we export is the dollar!!)  wheee!

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 19:07 | Link to Comment DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

we export consumption

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:49 | Link to Comment Almost Solvent
Almost Solvent's picture

True hyperinflation ala Zimbabwe would collapse not only the US economy, but most of the world. $100 loaves of bread will lead to mass panic and riots.

What will happen is extended period of high inflation.

Don't shorthand hyperinflation unless you really mean the end of civil society.

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 23:42 | Link to Comment merehuman
merehuman's picture

All of you are more financially informed than I.

Yet i have heard for some time how the market should fall, have certainly expected it as did many of you. Yet here we still are awaiting the crash and allowing more time yet to pass.  Meanwhile we are being raped by lies , if nothing else. As a society , how long can we avoid looking in the mirror, how long can the sheriff not do his job, the sec, CFTC and others . Do they not shave? How can one sleep well while murdering a country?

Why are so many people (millions) on the East coast going along with this? Surely they must be aware of this as you and I

I would like to NOT be the next Argentina

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 19:31 | Link to Comment walküre
walküre's picture

You know what i remember.. this is a while back.. going back about a year now... the down talking of the economy.. Warren Buffet seeing the economy falling off a cliff only to rattle the nerves of investors.

Ladies and gents, we are being served the prelude to QE and Stimuliti 2.0 here.

Nothing else. Their script is so lame !

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:15 | Link to Comment pak
pak's picture

Where's the fix? Why are they dragging their feet??

QE bitches!!

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 19:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/23/2010 - 19:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/24/2010 - 01:40 | Link to Comment dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

that wasnt simple

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 06:06 | Link to Comment jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

but far simpler than the real world.  such calculations cannot be made.  one can guess that such different tax schemes would lead to different growth rates, point to historical examples that may seem to support same, but calculate -- no.  and of course politicians rarely see past the next election much less the next century.  but one has to admit that bush and obama certainly pissed away the first few trillion with so little to show for it that it makes you cry, boggles the mind, blows one away (fill in the blank).

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 19:23 | Link to Comment painequalschange
painequalschange's picture

If things are so bad, why is a decent house around here ( San Jose ) still $1,000,000?  That's what I can't figure out.

 

 

 

 

Wed, 02/24/2010 - 08:18 | Link to Comment ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

Just like Nasdaq after hours, they are waiting for an idiot to put in a "Market" order and lift them.

Tue, 02/23/2010 - 21:49 | Link to Comment Al Gorerhythm
Al Gorerhythm's picture

And that's supposed to be good!?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!