- advertisements -
The only thing growing in this country is the size of Michelles ass
Whole country has too much junk in the trunk!
I'd rather have junk in the trunk so when shit hits the fan you might be able to miss quite a few meals and still be ok.
Unless your body is able to burn fat efficiently the extra weight you have to carry around while "gathering" will actually speed up your demise. The thing is most people can't burn fat efficiently; it is good to keep at least a routine of one long walk once a week.
LA face with the Oakland booty.
the trunk don't pack itself.
That gorilla faced bitch is one disgusting waste of oxygen. But that Barack...he's so eloquent, a great speechist. I mean, it totally changed what I thought about black people. I'm so glad I voted for him. And no, it wasn't to prove I'm not racist: I have lots of black friends! I don't care how much money he has to spend to pull this ditch out of the car! We need our unions and you mega wealthy yacht owners need to pay your fair share. Spread that wealth around like jam on lamb.
I never had any hope there would be real change until I saw what that poor Kenyan/Indonesian/Muslim/Christian-American had done with himself. It was the first time in my life I was proud to be an American. My only regret is that I can't send my kids to a school where they sing songs of praise to our dear leader all day long. I sure hope little Jenny finds a stud of a fella like Barry O. He's really a game changer on the race-mixing front going forward.
Hey- fuck off, okay?
you do realize you're complimenting him by giving him the cause. He's just another crooked pawn.
Anyone who says or writes "I'm not racist: I have lots of black friends!" has proven that he is in fact racist. But if your post was a parody, then, well, never mind.
Anybody bringing up such crap as reasoning to claim the moral highground for himself is just otally ucked.
Edit: oh ford, I am one myself as I didn't write himself/herself
Maybe zerohedge needs some kind of a basic intelligence test before people are allowed to post or junk comments. Hope this helps.
[sahr-kaz-uhm] Show IPA
harsh or bitter derision or irony.
a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.
too bad you couldn't see the sarcasm in what I wrote.
You're brilliant. OUCH! (I didn't junk you though)
"I never had any hope there would be real change until I saw what that poor Kenyan/Indonesian/Muslim/Christian-American had done with himself."
Now that's change you can believe in! I mean, that's change you can see!
Thanks for the tongue-in-cheek, Conrad. Priceless!
Long grape soda and fried chicken
Oh come on. Include links to before and after pictures so we can compare.
By the looks of it, it appears that when Michelle proclaimed that in order to get the things she wants “someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie (that’s you) so that someone else can have more,” she took most of the pie.
Reminds me of Charlie Rangel’s philosophy in that old joke when he got a call from his banker telling him his account was overdrawn. Yelled Charlie: “Whaddya mean, I’m overdrawn? I still have my checkbook!”
Nothing like lining up for “your share” of a pie someone else baked.
And the awareness that the Federal Reserve "system" is a cartel and primarily exists for the benefit of government "solvency" and the already wealthy.
I'm glad someone else finally put this type of article out there. GDP "growth" is a really silly measure of how good life is getting for people when it is measured in currency units that are worth less in real terms on a daily basis.
How about real wealth growth per capita? Or purchasing power growth per capita?
When facing unacceptable reality, all you have left is pretend, isn't it?
We can go down a list of "truths" people in this country cling to, just think about what's politically correct versus what is real. Things which people emotionally react to, etc. Just go down and list them; it's huge.
I like John Williams' analysis at Shadow Stats...
2% GDP growth = 0% Real GrowthMassively understating inflation by manipulating the CPI overstates GDP on the PCE side by about 2%...
lets not forget the importance of manipulating the price of PMs to hide inflation.
I just automatically subtract 3% from the headline GDP number. The first 3% is the NBER "gimme" which doesn't count. Like my first 90 strokes on an 18-hole course.
Just a freakin nightmare someone let me off this stupid cheap carnival ride!!
and the best part of the analogy is that the operators are low class criminals.
Hilarious. Hitler rants about Anthony Weiner.
His name is WEINER!Wasn't it only a matter of time before he posted a picture of his Johnson (albeit, a Photoshopped enlargement) on the internet???
I saw the pic. He ain't packin' much.
b_Blythe - Apparently Weiner sent the pic to the coed and asked, "Do you know what this is?"
Coed replied, "It looks like a penis, only smaller".
I think she will have a good chance to sue in Small Claims court.
wonder what his wife thinks about this:
Traveling the world with Hilary must give her a 'smaller' perspective on things
"Don't worry, Barney Frank has begun tweeting him."
The only chart you need to see: http://market-ticker.org/uploads/2010/Jul/debt-to-gdp.png
THanks Charles H.S.
Im expecting a sp between 1220-1250
Tyler, look at last 2 days decorrelation between Uprising EURUSD and bearish Silver... (VERY STRANGE)
I noticed that also, but am unable to pattern any FX pairs - and that is strange.
It's like removing any traces of intention.
We could pretend, but there's a super election cycle coming up in 2012.
Of course the real GDP of the United States is shrinking, given that a larger share of it is comprised of services which derive their value, in large part, from wages paid, and these wages will be under continuing pressure in both real and even nominal terms.
And then there's the big fact that more of the U.S. GDP is a function of deficit spending by government (adding to our heaping national debt year after year) than at any time since the core years of WWII, which when viewed in proper context, is a wasteful and counterproductive exercise that only subtracts from future GDP, as it will only create higher costs and a higher drag on growth in the private, real, organic economy.
One private business owner's miserable experience in a banana republic is some governmental employee's, or especially, government contractor's banana split sundae.
It's astonishing how much bullshit backs up the GDP data - hedonics, substitutions, price deflators. My gut tells me that the productive economy has been in contraction since at least 1999, hidden by public and private debt growth and dodgy adjustments..
The importance of the price deflater used by the BEA cannot be overstated. In calculating the "real" GDP the BEA continued to use an overall 1.9% annualized inflation rate, which is substantially lower than the inflation rates being reported by any of the BEA's sister agencies. The mathematical implications of the deflater are simple: a lower deflater creates a higher ‘real’ GDP reading. If April's CPI-U (as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics) of 3.2% year-over-year inflation is used as the deflater, the reported 1.84% annualized growth rate shrinks to a 0.56% annualized rate, and the ‘real final sales of domestic products’ is actually contracting at a 0.63% rate. If instead of the year-over-year CPI-U we were to use the annualized CPI-U from just the first quarter (5.7%), the ‘real’ GDP would be shrinking at a 1.82% annualized rate, and the ‘real final sales of domestic products’ would be contracting at a recession-like 3.01%.
So far the script is following classic austrian economic theory that krugman derides so much.
It is requiring increasing levels of debt to generate each marginal dollar of gdp growth.
If growth is not self sustaining by now then a double dip is in our future.
Bennie has no intention of qe3 by the way. The market has yet to price it in.
The market has yet to price in that there is no qe3 contemplated for now. To clarify.
"Bennie has no intention of qe3 by the way."
I wonder if this is part of the reason for the dramatic and sudden deterioration in the data releases. Has the Treasury has been trying to push the Fed to keep monetizing their borrowings, but Bennie's been resisting? Once you get addicted to something like printing money, politicians find it very hard to break the habit, which is one of the most powerful arguments for an independent central bank..
Yes good point.
Bennie doesn't make the decisions, he's merely the public face for the cartel. Never forget, he works for the cartel, not the other way around. The cartel OWNS the Fed, remember?
The Austrian's prescription - liquidate everything! - is an equally hopeless failure.
So it's fine to rip on Bennie, Turbotax Timmy, and Krugman. But to suggest genocidal deflation as a serious alternative rather than a deranged one is more than problematic.
What the... @down - what are you doing here? This blog is only for Tea's, etc.
Bennie has no intention of qe3 by the way.
Bennie has no intention of qe3 by the way.
So, you're a mind reader now? I doubt very much that you actually know what goes on inside Ben's bankster-programed head. Wait, you're not sleeping with him, are you?
Ok, you could easily be right (hell, the odds are 50/50 aren't they). However, when the withdrawls from removal of easy money start we will find out for certain. I'd wager that we see some kind of fed action to prop up things no latter than Labor Day - regardless of Ben's current intentions or desires.
You're correct in that it's a guessing game.
Some feel confident that the trend and the economic math and political calculations make it more certain than not.
The real questions that should be asked by more people, and given a deeper analysis, is whether it will matter, and if so, in what ways? What about the law of diminishing and even negative returns? What about the size, scope and type of collateral damage resulting from such distortion and suppression of free market forces?
These are the better questions.
No doubt, Sunshine. Those are better questions.
Even asking questions like that requires a state of mind that I doubt exists in the circles that will make the decisions. But, for those of us on the outside, how we answer will suggest some obvious courses of action.
World GDP isn't growing. UK, Australia, Japan, Europe.
World oil production is also not growing. Guess which way the causation goes.
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.