Guest Post: Captain Obvious (S&P) vs. Captain Oblivious (Tim Geithner)

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Nomi Prins

Captain Obvious (S&P) vs. Captain Oblivious (Tim Geithner)

Last week, President Obama
driveled on about nothing of consequence in his budget speech. Yeah, he
said he’d push to roll back tax cuts for the wealthy and close some
off-shore corporate tax loopholes, but he’s said both (many times)
before and neither happened, so in terms of revenue enhancement, it’s a
non-starter.

Today, S&P – that beacon of toxic
asset rating foresight (which has yet to be slapped with any monetary
accountability for its collusive role in bringing down our economy) came
to the astonishing conclusion that
the United States has a debt problem, and tagged the country with a
'negative watch' label. The S&P report proceeded to highlight fiscal
spending issues, related political debating, and our ridiculously high
debt vs. GDP percentage, which is only a few points below 100, as points
of main contention. It paid minor lip service to the ‘financial crisis’
as being a factor. It surprisingly (not) shied away from blaming
ongoing and potentially further devastating fallout from the
overleveraged mortgage related assets still clogging the books of the
Fed, housing agencies and financial firms as the banking system
maintains the appearance of solvency only through federally supported
accounting gimmickry and an exceedingly generous and ‘easy’ Federal
Reserve keeping assets bid and rates low in the face of inflation it
chooses to ignore.

Meanwhile, the media and Washington have been laser focused on $38 billion worth of budget cuts,
a whopping 1 percent of the entire budget, which as slight as it is in
the scheme of things, disproportionately chops public good buckets.
Rather than the excruciating time sink and mind-numbing arguments, it
might have been best to just lop 1% off the top of everything
proportionately, but that would have been too easy, and not political
enough. Maybe then we could have shifted focus to the real cause of our
budget woes – which is that our economy continues to deteriorate and the
people with the power to do something about it are lying about its very
cause and thus its remedies.

The flashing fuchsia elephant at the
core of our economic, and thus budget problems – remains the response to
the financial homicide imparted by the big-banks and abetted by the
Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. There was a choice to be
made in Washington in the fall of 2008 - smack Wall Street into place,
do a good-ole free-market – you fail if you deserve to fail, we’ll
protect consumer assets and that’s it maneuver - and deal with possibly
intense, but definable fall-out for a short period.  Or - lavish bailout
upon guarantee upon subsidy upon asset purchase upon the lowest rates
in our nation’s history on Wall Street, and wring the very possibility
of a recovery out of the general economy from the get-go. Of course, the
brilliant minds of our exceedingly-privileged, out-of-touch, economic
leadership decided on the former, and are acting their asses off to
pretend that that decision, in itself, wasn’t the cause of the economic
problems that followed, from Main Street anemia, to commodity inflation
to international disdain and a weak currency that has no right to even
have the purchasing capacity it still does.

And, yet Tim Geithner had the audacity
of job-security to take his debt ceiling ‘plea’, on the Sunday Morning
talk show circuit – really, we will be in crisis and other countries
will think poorly of our ability to pay our debts if we don’t raise the
ceiling and increase our debt. In truth, it is Tim Geithner’s ego on the
line, while his boss, through staggering absence of mention, is fine
with assuaging it. Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke remained
silent about the topic, not least because between the Fed and the
Treasury department, more debt has been racked up and issued in the past
two years than ever before.  Of course, the debt cap will get raised,
just as it got raised under Treasury Secretaries Paul O’Neil, John Snow
and Hank Paulson.

When Geithner got elevated from the NY
Federal Reserve head position of aiding Wall Street in its time of need
to the Treasury Department, from where he could rubber stamp the entire
bailout notion as being essential to our survival as a nation, the
amount of Treasury Security debt outstanding was $5.7 trillion (in
tradable securities, and $591 billion in nonmarketable ones.)  In August
2008, just before the most powerful banks sucked the soul out of the
country in every manner possible, Treasury debt outstanding was  $4.9 trillion.

Today, outstanding Treasury debt stands at $9.1 trillion,
an increase of $4.2 trillion since the big bailout began, most of which
occurred under Geithner, though it started under Hank Paulson, who in
2007 and recently on Tim's behalf,
has used all of Geithner's current arsenal of reasons to request a
sizeable debt cap increase. All of it, allegedly to avoid a Depression
and propel us to what has been deemed a slow recovery by none other than
the Treasury Department, the White House and the Federal Reserve.

Geithner can (and will) keep pretending
that this seismic debt increase was a requirement to fix our main
economy, even though the actual fiscal stimulus package of the Obama
administration accounts for only 18% of this increase, so the numbers
just don’t fly.  Indeed, they only make sense if you take into
consideration other diversions, like the $1.37 trillion of
Treasuries, about a trillion of which is in excess bank reserves, and
the nearly $1 trillion of mortgage-related securities parked at the Fed,
the $142 billion of mortgage-related assets at the Treasury deparment,
and various remaining FDIC guaranteed bank debt hangover from the
bailout period, and sundries like JPM Chase’s ongoing Fed backing for
its Bear Stearns’s acquisition.

Meanwhile, our debt interest will be more than $430 billion this year,
or more than ten times the amount being quibbled about by the elected
partisan politicians that are debating it, as the value of our debt and
debt-worthiness diminishes.

Anyone can make promises that at some
time in the future, some of any budget will be more in check, or even
that unicorns will overtake the oval office and do a better job running
the economy, but the fact remains – misguided, larcenous policies
created a boatload of debt to float a financial system that continues to
suck us dry (near zero borrowing costs from non-zero lending through
mortgage, personal loans, credit cars, or whatever), and until this fact
is given even an iota of a percentage of the time that the smaller
bantering is given, we will continue to sink further into a financial
abyss of the Fed’s, Treasury department’s, bi-partisan Congress’ and
executive leadership’s making, no matter who’s in charge. For now, there
are those excess reserves at the Fed - just saying.