- advertisements -
There are regulators that need to be appeased? What?
"McKinsey estimates the liquidity shortfall of meeting this requirement is ~$800billion."
So? Bernank will need additional liquidity pumping
in the "system" near 1 trillion $. QE3?
Funny money shell game.
Another try to find a bullish reason to buy CCC treasuries. Banks outside the US with lower inflation will rather deposit the cash at 0% at the national bank than going into this experiment... Apart from that there are also good quality gov. bonds available like "Deutsche Bundesanleihen" or SGS.
Bullshit. This isn't going to be implemented until2015! The house is on fire NOW! Even if they want to move to liquid assets the default of soverign and US debt is a very realistic event. Even if you wanted to add liquidity the FORM that takes is in question right now. Whats the dollar or the Euro or treasuries going to be worth in two years. Even in a deflation if you can't pay your debt the debt instrument will be worthless and no one will want to deposit that turd in their banking toilets. We all know where the safe long term haven is right now no matter how many times they extend and rig the markets. Math is a bitch.
2015? If it doesn't suit the banks it will be pushed back another couple of years anyways.
Yes the house is burning to the ground, but no problem theres word a tiny firetruck driven by 2 spider monkeys will show up 4 years from now!
So, we're talking about tying up additional capital in US debt instruments? Debt that is defaulting? Or, is this just a deal to absorb Japanese and Chinese bond sales?
Europe is talking about reducing Basel III capital requirements because their banks are not able to meet the new standards, but US banks won't?
They just suspended the derivative market requirements from DonginFwank, but they will require these?
I won't hold my breath.
So, can anyone recommend a good, basic Swiss Bank account? I sure as hell don't want my money here.
Thanks swissinv, I'll take a look!
This is old news and poorly reasoned
Banks are unlikely to buy govt debt outright to meet the LCR (too much duration risk and no desire to hedge in case they might need to sell quickly)
Maybe they will reverse repo govt debt for short term. This won't suppress yields
Most likely they will hold cash at central banks.
Nobody wants to own that toxic sovereign stuff
Any argument that the market floor for sovereign debt is greater than zero long term... is not based in reality.
The Bernank has outsmarted us again! Currently FedR buys 70% of treasuries.... this new move will create demand for treasuries. Banks will start loading up now to meet 2015 deadlines for "on hand liquidity" HOWEVER... in the NEXT systemic crash... what then happens to price of treasuries? In a Major Banking Event, you WANT treauries to keep stable as a "safe haven" They cannot be a safe haven if everybody sells en masse to CYA. BOOM... treasuries implode instantly. THAT is how the Treasury Bubble will implode. Holy Shit. They've been PLANNING to pop the bubble!
And Treasuries will be worthless.
Really incredible ... create you own demand through legislation and tell everyone it's about making the banks more stable.
The Force is strong with you.
snake eating tail
That's why they pay these guys the big bucks.
PHDs in Ponzinomics and Sleight of hand.
Unlike those pesky inedible metals, the new form of ponzi wealth is unlimited.
Everyone a millionaire, gotta love that ponzi....
The governments and the banks have never done a good job estimating liquidity. More importantly, if they all hold the same 'liquid' assets and all need to sell them at the same time, what are the chances they will be so 'liquid' at the time? About zero.
Then in the meantime, banks will find some way to create the riskiest investment possible that still meets the legal definitions of the liquidity requirement and that is all they will own.
AAA CMO's did not invent themselves. They got created because they were the cheapest AAA paper out there and risk departments viewed them as very safe and very liquid so banks and others could build massive positions.
Even if these rules ever get implemented, they will likely fail to work when finally required.
Wouldn't this demand only be temporary? 500 billion of treasuries...the Government prints that in a couple months.
Sounds more like me that capital and risk-- especially relating to liquid/safe assets are grossly mispriced and understood by Dodd-Frank, regulators, and banks.
Hahahaha....its hilarious. No one can take this seriously...Basel III is 2019 and hybrids are still being allowed. PDs R trying to lure people in and buying 10s at ridiculous prices
well we all know sovreigns carry zero risk.
I hate when they do stupid stuff like this. that is one of the ain problems with the system is a "risk free rate". that does not exist!!!
oh, I think the next potential s and P short is about 1325!!
no f... way.
You need Basel MCMVXIII for that
Anyway any of Basels don't apply for TBTFs, correct?
Could someone explicate how in the world these ad hoc Basel agreements gain the force (or color) of law in U.S. jurisdiction without a ratified treaty and or why no Fed member banks complain about such arbitrary regulator discretion in adopting the same?
Because it's crap. Imagine all your friends from college getting together and having a party. There is no DD so you all agree not to drink too much, and write up a contract that states you will all be sober in 4 years. In the meantime, kegs are tapped and shots are shat and someone drives into a tree. But hey, you agreed to get your shit together in 2015, so it's all good.
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.