You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Guest Post: Financial Markets Begin To Repudiate Green Shoots Story, 30 Year Poised For New Q3 Highs

Tyler Durden's picture




Submitted by John Bougearel of Structural Logic

Green shoots are no longer producing bullish signals for the stock market. At best, they are a mixed signal. On yesterday’s Consumer Confidence upside surprise, the high tick for the day was at exactly on the announcement at 9:00 am. The market “gets it” that the green shoots have been but a temporary elixir for the consumer. What now, brown cow that the Clunkers program ended Aug 24 and the new homeowner tax credit has largely been used up (those that wanted to take advantage of the tax credit would have done so by July for the new school year).

The bond market of course has been all over the waning of the green shoots story long before the stock market as it bottomed on August 7. This is GDP week. The chart below shows a correlation between this GDP week and last month’s GDP week. The correlation is weakened by the fact that we will not have an ECI number. But the fact remains that the rate of change off this Monday’s GDP week low is faster than the rate of change off of last month’s rally off the Monday July 27 GDP week low.

As such, the time and price model suggests the 30 year can breach the Q3 highs at 12109-12111 set on Alcoa’s earnings and Meredith Whitney’s bullish banking call on July 8-11 (when the stock market bottomed in Q3). The upside target is the upper 122 handle by Friday. The catalyst for a bond rally/equity selloff would presumably come on this Friday’s Personal Consumption or PCE report for July. Personal consumption is expected to decline from 0.4 n June to 0.2 in July. Personal Income is expected to be flat at 0.0 from a -1.3% decline in June. However, Michigan Sentiment out 45 minutes later that day should rebound and upside surprise economists given the upside surprise in Consumer Confidence which had upticked from the govt’s Clunker incentive program.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 18:55 | Link to Comment BM (not verified)
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:00 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

Woulda been happy with a link...

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:20 | Link to Comment Missing_Link
Missing_Link's picture

You are hit by Wall of Text.

Wall of Text hits you for 1000 damage.

You die.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:21 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Look pal, I told you three weeks ago that these people are not going to go for this type of stuff. Take it from the fool of this site. They do not like it and, do not take long to realize they do not like it. ( about 3 lines). I appreciate the time you put in on this thing. I went to the middle and read one line and knew it was you. Not only are we cutting off your country's food stamps, but, we are also no longer sending de-wormer to your women.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 18:56 | Link to Comment Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

Can't the Fed (or some proxy thereof) just buy Uncle Sugar's 30y and suppress the yield using their magical balance sheet trash can?  Will they?

 

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:11 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

They can simply print alternate currency that buys up the bonds that the fed have printed. Do it over time suck up the fractioning that is inherent in the system. But probably wouldn't take long as so much of it is defaulting anyway. It wouldn't affect anything other than removing all the horsing around that is going on. Then you simply keep the currency based on population. Inflation and deflation then occurs only for very very short period of times as it's not sustainable due to either supply constraints or demand constraints.

Watch the movie "The Money Masters" it explains everything about currency.

 

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:37 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

They should change the name from engraving to enzombying and enresurrecting.

Thu, 08/27/2009 - 14:12 | Link to Comment darkness (not verified)
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:02 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

*sigh* Why are people still so scared of the 30 year???? At least you'll GET your money back.... Especially when half of the companies out there issuing paper still have a high probability of failing..... Funny. I bet Rates drop into the 2's again before they launch into the 8s

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:34 | Link to Comment Hansel
Hansel's picture

Maybe the Chinese would love to sell you those treasuries too.  You might get your money back over 30 years, but will it be worth anything?  If rates spike in the meantime you will be sitting on some ugly mtm losses until you "get your money back".

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:45 | Link to Comment VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

The only thing scarier than holding a large amount of US Dollars is holding a promise to get paid a large amount of US Dollars in 30 years...

Thu, 08/27/2009 - 14:13 | Link to Comment darkness (not verified)
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:03 | Link to Comment RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

The higher bond prices go...

The cheaper speculators can borrow...

And more and more vast quantities of deficit spending can be financed....

Its pretty much Nirvana for the Fed.

And Nirvana for the quadrillions of interest rate swaps out there, luxuriating in record low volatility throughout the curve...

 

Thu, 08/27/2009 - 07:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:06 | Link to Comment Steak
Steak's picture

I have a somewhat divergent thesis.  In a world awash in liquidity (for financial players at least) folks are now seeking higher yields.  I see the appreciation of the 30-year as more of a money looking for a home theme.  PBs don't want all this overpriced short duration debt while the steep yield curve gives people opportunities in longer durations (one would think if they've drunk the kool-aid).

I'm watching 2's n 10's.  Looks like we've got a trend toward flattening which I would actually expect to continue in the face of higher equity markets.

So we can have appreciating longer dated govt debt w/o that indicating deflation expectations.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:06 | Link to Comment OrganicGeorge
OrganicGeorge's picture

History Will See Bernanke As Worst Fed Chairman Last update: 8/26/2009 6:48:00 PM FORT LEE, N.J., Aug 26, 2009 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -

You are pimping a news release off of a PR wire?

Please

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:10 | Link to Comment Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

stupid fat fingers....

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:11 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

*sigh* We are in an "inflation" bubble...... When inflation hits too hard too fast, people seeking yield cause malinvestment, businesses continue to pursue unproductive activities that are not sustainable going forward.... I'm so glad we paid for all those new cars to be built :)

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:32 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Have you ever read the descriptions of hyperinflation in Argentina?  People spending money they received in the morning because prices would rise by evening?  It is scary, far scarier than the Great Depression scenario.  there will be panic when it hits here.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:39 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

We've had a little bit of that here. During the 70's if you were a contractor on anything that occured slowly by the time you bid on a job and then got the go ahead you couldn't afford to do the job. Everything kept getting delayed massively. You literally couldn't do any very large project because it wasn't stable enough to price.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:35 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

And we could 25 to 50 percent inflation easily once the distortions crack.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:22 | Link to Comment PD Quig
PD Quig's picture

I was there in 1977-78. It was a total mess, especially when they lopped four zeroes off the peso. Half the stores had stuff marked in old prices and half in new prices. Everybody was living like there was no tomorrow...which made for some great unexpected intimate liaisons.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 19:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/27/2009 - 01:42 | Link to Comment Assetman
Assetman's picture

I didn't hear that... but I did hear that Uncle Ben will be taking a few days off for a new portrait.

Apparently, rumor has it Benny will be the new face on the new Trillion Dollar Bill.

You heard it here first.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:14 | Link to Comment Jeanbon
Jeanbon's picture

To comment past macro data with the actual 

stock market trend is nonsense, if you start

to trade on macro data, you are always behind

the curve. Like those folks who start to buy

the good news this week, when the market

has rallied already 50 %. 

 

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:25 | Link to Comment Missing_Link
Missing_Link's picture

I agree completely with your insight that attempting to factor in macro data with the current market trend, as this always puts you behind the curve.

The lion's share of the technical indicators, though -- and here I mean the GOOD technical indicators, not mystical nonsense such as Fibonacci retracements -- indicate that this rally at least has a few more days to go.  It's still too early to short.  We can't see the whites of their eyes yet.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 20:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 21:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/27/2009 - 01:49 | Link to Comment Assetman
Assetman's picture

If that's the case, the options markets will be reeling it in.

The FED should know by now how gosh awful ineffective halting shorts has been.

As for inverse-ETFs, one only needs to find another exchange.  I hear Vancouver is nice in the fall.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 21:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:23 | Link to Comment Fruffing
Fruffing's picture

queued for moderation?  wtf!

Since when was a two line comment on the long end of the yield curve potentially scurillious?

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:25 | Link to Comment Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

all anon posts are moderated.

Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 08/27/2009 - 14:11 | Link to Comment darkness (not verified)
Thu, 08/27/2009 - 14:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!