Guest Post: A Global Tsunami, Courtesy Of The Fed

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Chris Martenson

A Global Tsunami, Courtesy Of The Fed

The Fed is in a bind.  No matter which way it turns, utter failure is a risk.  Putting more money into the system risks no less than the dollar itself.  Stopping quantitative easing (QE) risks plunging the economy and financial system into another period of turbulent decline.  It looks like they are going to choose the latter.

In a recent report, I made the case that pressure was building on the Fed to end its QE 2 program in June, and that if it did, there would be an enormous rout in the stock, bond, and commodity markets. That analysis still stands.

This new two-part report will analyze the many competing factors, both for and against, that will determine whether QE 2 really is the end of the Fed's efforts at printing up a recovery, or merely the event that precedes QE 3. The factors are numerous and polarized. On the one hand there are many signs of economic recovery - the very best that a few trillion can buy - and on the other hand there's $108/barrel oil and a deeply uncertain future for Japan over the next 3-12 months.

Fed Adopting Tougher Posture

Recently the Fed has trotted out several of its governors to make the case that they are serious about ending QE 2. Strangely, they chose Friday and Saturday to go on a publicity tour -- days of the week normally reserved for news that is being buried, not exposed.

I found the following news snippets odd, not just because of their Friday/Saturday timing, but because they are all versions of the story purporting that the Fed is "thinking about tightening."

Fed’s Fisher Says He Backs Ending Central Bank’s Jobs Mandate

March 25, 2011, 2:45 PM EDT By Vivien Lou Chen and Jennifer Ryan March 25 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard W. Fisher said he supports the idea of dropping the central bank’s congressional mandate for achieving full employment.

Fed's Plosser: Funds rate should hit 2.5% in year

March 25, 2011, 12:38 p.m. EDT By Greg Robb WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The Federal Reserve should hike interest rates from current range near zero to 2.5% within a year under a plan unveiled Friday by Charles Plosser, the president of the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank. Plosser did not give a specific time when this exit would begin but said it would have to start in the "not-too-distant future." In a speech to economists from the monetarist school on Friday, Plosser laid out an aggressive plan where the Fed would sell $125 billion of assets for each 25 basis point increase in the funds rate.

Fed Policy Makers Should Review QE2 Strategy, Bullard Says

March 26, 2011, 9:00 AM EDT By Scott Hamilton March 26 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Federal Reserve policy makers should review whether to complete a second round of quantitative-easing purchasing due to end in June because of strong U.S. economic data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said.

All of these are part of a carefully choreographed PR campaign by the Fed to signal to the market that it is serious about ending QE efforts.

A week later, in another Saturday release (April 2, 2011), Bill Dudley offered up perhaps the clearest view of what the Fed is thinking:

Faster-than-expected payroll growth last month shouldn’t alter the U.S. central bank’s plans to buy $600 billion in Treasuries through June to prop up the recovery, said William C. Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

“I don’t see any reason to pull back from that yet,” Dudley said to reporters after a speech yesterday in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Market expectations are for the Fed to complete its planned bond purchases in June and not to announce additional buying, he said. “I don’t view those expectations as unreasonable in any significant way.”


So the messages given a week earlier were digested by the markets, and the Fed decided to sharpen things up a bit by saying that the $600 billion program would be completed, but that's it.  It seems clear they want us to prepare ourselves for a sudden termination of QE at the end of June.

To further drive the point home, the Fed recently conducted a couple of "reverse QE" transactions, a.k.a. 'tri-party reverse repos,' which are nothing more than the Fed doing the exact opposite of QE -- putting Treasury bonds out and taking cash back in.

The scope of these operations was quite small, $1.75 billion in one instance and $0.75 billion in the other. But their true importance lies in their signal to the market that the Fed may someday not only stop the QE program, but reverse it.

Altogether, the Fed is sending out very strong signals that it intends to at least halt QE2 on schedule and not immediately move to QE3. There will be a pause.

What happens if the Fed abandons QE?

The reason we should all be quite concerned about the Fed ending its QE efforts is that the asset markets will take quite a dive if it does, but each for their own reasons.

Let's be clear about what the Fed has been doing with its QE programs: it has been printing up high-powered money out of thin air and exchanging it for Treasury notes (and bills and bonds). This shows up beautifully in the monetary base charts dutifully kept over at the St. Louis Fed:


The monetary base has gone up by some 300% since the start of the crisis. This is the money that has been sneaking out into the commodity, stock, and bond markets.

We can appreciate the scale of this in the amounts that are now being funneled into the capital markets on a near-daily basis:


What we need to consider is what will happen when an average of $4.4 billion dollars per business day are no longer flooding into the markets. Will asset prices be at risk of falling without these massive daily infusions of liquidity? You bet.

And add to this an unexpected threat that's just entered the picture: Japan.

A Disturbance In The Force

The biggest risk here, aside from parts shortages and supply chain difficulties, is what happens when the flood of liquidity that has emanated from Japan over the past two decades reverses course and flows in the other direction. This is a major transition (which I expounded upon more deeply in a recent post for my enrolled members) for which both Japan and the world economy at large are wholly unprepared.

If we add the idea of the Fed terminating QE, which has been enormously supportive of Treasury prices (and therefore low interest rates) to the idea of Japan suddenly becoming a net importer of funds instead of an exporter, we can quickly arrive at the risk of a rather unpleasant period for US Treasuries -- and, by extension, many other government bonds.

Already the governments of Portugal, Greece, and Ireland are paying rates on their sovereign bonds that are way above their nominal rates of GDP growth, which is a certain recipe for financial disaster. It's as if to survive, you need to borrow by using your credit card, even though your rate of interest on the card is several times larger than your yearly salary increases. Eventually that ends badly, and everyone knows it.

Along with that, we have to consider the idea that rapidly rising interest rates in the US Treasury market are destabilizing in other ways, but especially to the $600 trillion dollar derivative market - a significant portion of which is tied to US Treasury interest rates. Who knows what sorts of accidents await in a market that is too complicated to grasp in its entirety?

Of course, the US housing market, still struggling from poor sales, a massive shadow inventory, falling prices, and far too much negative equity, will perform especially poorly if interest rates rise.

If the Fed terminates QE on schedule, then I think a tsunami metaphor is apt. First, all of the liquidity will drain out of the bay, leaving countries, governments, and institutions to flop about in the mud. Then the Fed will panic and resume the liquidity flood, feeding the wave that will rush back in to destroy the lives and portfolios of those who positioned their wealth in harm's way.

The biggest problem with the current situation is that there's practically nowhere to hide. To an unprecedented degree, all of the world's markets and all assets classes are now trading in synchrony. If all of the assets in all the world's markets are moving up and down together, where does one go to sidestep the policy foibles of the Fed?

In Part II of this report, Finding Shelter From the Storm, we delve into specific strategies to consider for preserving wealth during these very turbulent times - as well as offer trading guidance for those willing to put risk capital into play. We explore what is likely to happen to the major asset classes (stocks, bonds, precious metals, housing, commodities) as the Fed attempts to tighten, and what is then likely to transpire if it later throws in the towel and begins printing again.

There are treacherous waters ahead. Liquidity will leave of the system and then come crashing back in. The unwary will lose nearly everything in the process, and so will some of the wary. Beating this current period of financial disruption by preserving your wealth will not be an easy task. Those looking to do so should consider reading Part II of this report  (free executive summary; paid enrollment required to access).


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
TruthInSunshine's picture
Go ahead and file the above headline and underlying denial by The Bernank's minions under LULZ or #losing.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”


-- Mahatma Gandhi


Let me also take the opportunity to use the Nikkei as a prime example of BOJ interventionism running rampant to support the index now, only to find every measure of interjectionism currently undertaken met by two or more steps of reality taking over at some point later (and what could possibly go wrong?; just chart the Nikkei from 1989 to present). And this is what really causes cataclysmic events, much to The Bernank's chagrin.

disabledvet's picture

not bad for a country lawyer.  Gandi that is.  And i see Japan as "at risk of splitting in two" if this "pathology" continues.

Herd Redirection Committee's picture

We all know how this ends.  It ends with the death of the US dollar.  They want it SO bad, and they are going to get it.

As usual, the folly of man, we don't know what we want.  The public is complicit in all of this, but no one will react until the collapse is under way.   Aah, the wonders of herd behavior.

Check out the latest from the Capital Research Institute "Don't Trust the Frontmen":

At the forefront is the issue of world reserve currency, as the global economic system hinges on it. China sees the Fed printing money, and in general making the rules up as it goes along, and of course, they want to be able to do the same. Who wouldn’t want to be able to print their own money, and make up the rules as they go along??? Unfortunately, that is no basis for a global economic system, as it would quickly degenerate into a world awash with dozens of useless and devalued fiat currencies. No one would use another’s paper currency, knowing it to be intrinsically worthless, and so trade would be very difficult. Doesn’t this seem eerily similar to the world we currently live in? The solution would be for someone to come along and decides to make their paper redeemable in gold, at a fixed rate. As long as gold was redeemable at that rate, confidence, honesty, and trust would be restored...

dizzyfingers's picture

It also seems eerily similar to the one we had in the 50s and early 60s, with trade tariffs, labor strikes/murders/bombings, etc.

Has there really been something else in between then and now, or does it just seem to be all the same?

Maniac Researcher's picture

What Herd has linked to [capital research institute] is not analysis. It is simply another rant filled with ad hominem attacks and straw men - sprinkled prodigiously with all-caps derisions. That and it is simply just another goldbug's blog.

Just like "capital research institute," this comment is true to the ZH ethos - whatever is making your life difficult at the moment becomes the biggest problem in the world. a bunch of affluent, mostly white, mostly male, mostly American investors are losing money in a world dominated by corporate finance organizations who don't play fair. Thus, their solution becomes a simplistic and symbolic attempt to rein in the chaos they perceive in their own lives: buying precious metals. Then -- and here is the fun part -- they decide to project this problem/solution construct as *the* pressing issue in the world.

Unfortunately for Herd, "captial research" bloggers, and the rest of the ZH crowd, their own narrow, lazily-constructed view of history - the one that hinges primarily on personal experience rather than empirical research - informs their opinion.

Maniac Researcher's picture

Note: before your little fingers start typing away saying, "HA! Maniac Researcher just created a strawman out of ZH!" - I'd like to cite the context for every one of my comments as evidence that yes, in fact, the ZH crowd *is* in fact, intellectually narrow and lazy. Sorry, but a wider world exists beyond your embittered complaints of Federal Reserve conspiracy theories.

I love the coming response though - it's become such a stock signifier of internet fools everywhere - the "accuse the person who is calling me out on my bullshit of the same thing" method is quite popular on Zero Hedge.

You're the same people who honk at the person they've just cut off in traffic after almost causing an accident.


I just thought I'd jump on and tell you and your friends to go to hell. You *are* the tormentors you lambaste: the bigoted, the selfish, the embittered armchair losers. The banksters you claim to hate are just more powerful versions of yourself.

You couldn't care less about the impoverished, those stricken by disaster, or the historically screwed-over populations. So why pretend to play activist? I'll answer that -- because you need to validate your petty, vicious little life. You only see disaster and apocalypse because it provides you an escape from your impotence. I pity you and all the other ZHers - the foolish regulars and the new Stormfront add-ons. You've got nothing but your misdirected anger. It clouds what little analytical ability you have developed in each of your narrow experiences. Thus, you're simply talking to yourselves because you can imagine few options to improve your lives and/or the world. Feel free to pass on the message and have a nice day.


Landrew's picture

Pardon me, you didn't say anything yet again. So what is your point? You don't like what the community has to say? If so, why come here other than to be part of the community that you hate. Strange, you attack as though you said something worth responding to.

 Usually, some one has at least one point in their debate, however at this point I will respond with

he who asserts must prove! You lose and I will now do a victory dance!

Maniac Researcher's picture

let's unpack Landrew's statement now --

A) I did say something and I believe it came through loud and clear: Zerohedge is rife with hypocrisy. You cannot scream for justice while deriding others.

B) I was part of your community for the last two years. I started posting many months ago because I noticed a [steep] downward trend in the quality of commentary.

C) Repeating the falsehood [In this case that I don't have a point] doesn't make it true.

D) Feel free to feel like you've "won." Narrow-minded thoughts tend to boil down to winning and losing in order to protect themselves from the inherent complexity of the world. Hug that winning feeling, little Landrew - let it bring you comfort on those cold nights when things seem less black and white...and careful not piss yourself during your victory dance.

Maniac Researcher's picture

A conspiracy around every corner! So pray tell, what company do you think I work for - this ought to be good...

Herd Redirection Committee's picture

This is for Maniac:  Do you find yourself projecting much?  The analysis has been done, the system is corrupt, now is the time to inform people.  If using emotion drives home the point more so than logical arguments, then ask is it effective at reaching a new audience, or not?

"world dominated by corporate finance organizations who don't play fair"

The world is run by people, not 'finance organizations'.  There are two sets of rules in the world.  That is a big problem.  Trying to make a better world for my grandchildren (and by extension, all of humanity) is my only goal, please don't project motives onto me.

Maniac Researcher's picture

Right...and you've chosen to "inform" people on a forum that is filled with victim-blaming hate mongering. That's sure to end well.

And since you are currently apologizing for it - I *will* project that conclusion on to your motivations.

Herd Redirection Committee's picture

What are you doing right now exactly?  Trying to do an ad hominem attack on the entire ZH community? 

There IS some groupthink on ZeroHedge, and there IS also influence from paid posters.  That is to be expected on any sizable forum.  To imply that the forum is then effectively useless is not only a logical fallacy, but a direct insult directed at everyone here who is trying to raise awareness, have intelligent discourse. 

It is possible you are just here seeking attention, so that would not have occurred to you.

Maniac Researcher's picture

Right...ZH has utility in the same way a peace rally is sure to go over well when someone is raped in the crowd.

Actually, I'm here to call bullshit on the assumption that Zerohedge is somehow useful commentary without the inclusion of the bile-filled morons who babble their incoherent conspiracy theories every day. Oh yeah, that and Tyler has been screaming the sky is falling for *years*. When someone can't stop screaming fire in a crowded room, eventually you do want to punch the son of a bitch.

Let me ask you a couple of questions Herd, since we're on the topic of Zerohedge's so-called 'merits' -- how do you manage to overlook the bigotry when you read this blog? Do you think of puppies? Perhaps a small grinning aryan child? Question two: when the collapse fails to come on each predicted date, do you feel pangs of disappointment? Do you pine for food riots, arson, and looting? Feel free to let out your best apocalypse fantasy. All the ZH fans are listening in, lathering it up. They'll climax at your lush imagery of food lines and the killing of innocent passerbys. Let it fly, Herd.

StychoKiller's picture

You couldn't care less about the impoverished, those stricken by disaster, or the historically screwed-over populations. So why pretend to play activist? I'll answer that -- because you need to validate your petty, vicious little life. You only see disaster and apocalypse because it provides you an escape from your impotence.


Put yer muny where your mouth is, alleviate some suffering:,

then find some smaller paint brushes.

Maniac Researcher's picture

Yes, Stycho. Feel free to repeat your lame solution. I've already pointed out why worldvision is a poor choice for a charity. Aside from being fraudulent to the point where even Oxfam is deriding them, since when is a Fundie charity the only option for activism? You have a pretty narrow conception of such things.

How about putting your time where your mouth is? Try digging through mounds of corporate memos for years on end in order to nail white collar criminals and then call me back, Stycho. You know nothing about the institutions you whine about. In fact, you know less than nothing - at least if you knew you know nothing that would be something. I think that void was probably filled with rosy images of Jesus giving bread to Africans.

You've still got nothing. And you have nothing on me. I'll keep the brushes, thanks - I'll make better use of them than you will.

Thomas's picture

I told Dudley to his face he had an inflation problem. He laughed (knowingly, IMO).

Hugh G Rection's picture

Whats the over/under on the Fed's demise? I dont think they celebrate 100 yrs of oppression.

dizzyfingers's picture

Are the Chinese buying commodities?

Rusty Shorts's picture

Exactly. Which is why most people I know think they can ignore the math and everything will be okay. They fight the very idea that there is a real decline in quality of life, that it is permanent, and that it will continue to deteriorate.  "Apres moi, le deluge." Everyone else will get screwed but not me, I got mine.

It's a tsunami. Previous paradigms no longer apply.
Teevee, junkfood-addled Amerika could not withstand a currency collapse. The Black Plague made human capital valuable again - in modern application we have tens of millions on the gov't teat with no recovery.

All those 99-weekers waiting for jobs. What jobs? Doing what? The service economy is a fiat lie and our infrastructure is based on a constant flow of cheap oil.
Mortgage? WTF for? Prices are artificially high because of 1) shadow inventory 2) who can say they will be employed in their profession to make payments for 30 years anymore - no man is an island.

Stay nimble. Stay quick. This is no time for white picket fences. Going back to the sad, miserable, drugged-up state of our Nation it ain't a stretch to imagine that the Mandarin speakers are planning to make use of their raw (war) materials and spouse-less young men for "real estate acquisition". Hasn't anyone read a history book around here? The Chi-Coms have openly spoken of how they deserve North America. This kind of scenario isn't discussed because it is the worst-case scenario outside of nuc-bio-chem warfare, and then subsequent invasion.

"Oh, but China needs us and we need them." Bullshit. Everyone is buying time. The Chinese aren't stupid and they know they aren't getting their money back. Some finance guy over there said US bonds are not safe medium and long. In other words "We are trying to buy as much time as possible to acquire tangible assets that matter!"
All the survivalists from the 70's were wrong because they didn't understand the "Nixon" trick/effect of taking us off the gold standard and taking paper money to its extreme utility. It would have been better to face this shitstorm back then. Back when Americans were still eating meals that had real nutrition, no obesity epidemic, actual human interaction, strong infrastructure with less bureaucracy. Today it's all bloated beyond recognition.

When the Fed finally makes a move that has a visible and real effect on Amerika even rationing of supplies won't keep the interurban areas content. We are at the brink of a f.u.n.d.a.m.e.n.t.a.l. shift. Be far away from the millions that require a weekly check for their very survival. Do you think the owners of the Fed care if millions starve?


 - ZH comment

samsara's picture

Dead on as usual Rusty.

We are at the brink of a f.u.n.d.a.m.e.n.t.a.l. shift. Be far away from the millions that require a weekly check for their very survival

billhilly's picture

Excellent comments Rusty!  Thanks.

ColonelCooper's picture

If there was such a thing as a "Thunderous Applause" button on this site, I'd be pushing it.  Thanks, Rusty.

dizzyfingers's picture

All frighteningly true. No exit. No place to go. No way to "prepare".

Ancona's picture

If the Fed stops QE, then who will buy our bonds? With Japan in a position of needing huge sums of cash, their hoard of treasuries might just be on the market soon, requiring further monetization.

It looks to me like we're terminally fucked.

Got gold and silver? You are going to need them in very short order.

alexanderstollznow's picture

when the Fed stops QE, the buyers will be the same people who have been buying UST for some years, but the Treasury will be paying a higher interest rate.  the whole purpose of QE is to lower interest rates further out along the curve, beyond where Fed Funds has any affect.  in this overall regard and purpose, QE is no different to OMO to affect the Fed Funds rate. 

as regards Japan, i must say i think it is a very silly notion to look at the cost of the tsunami, and assume that the Japanese gov will just write a cheque for that amount.  in any case, given that Japan is a prolific JGB seller, i would reckon they would just sell more of their own, rather than start selling UST.

alexanderstollznow's picture

when the Fed stops QE, the buyers will be the same people who have been buying UST for some years, but the Treasury will be paying a higher interest rate.  the whole purpose of QE is to lower interest rates further out along the curve, beyond where Fed Funds has any affect.  in this overall regard and purpose, QE is no different to OMO to affect the Fed Funds rate. 

as regards Japan, i must say i think it is a very silly notion to look at the cost of the tsunami, and assume that the Japanese gov will just write a cheque for that amount.  in any case, given that Japan is a prolific JGB seller, i would reckon they would just sell more of their own, rather than start selling UST.

alexanderstollznow's picture

when the Fed stops QE, the buyers will be the same people who have been buying UST for some years, but the Treasury will be paying a higher interest rate. the whole purpose of QE is to lower interest rates further out along the curve, beyond where Fed Funds has any affect. in this overall regard and purpose, QE is no different to OMO to affect the Fed Funds rate.

as regards Japan, i must say i think it is a very silly notion to look at the cost of the tsunami, and assume that the Japanese gov will just write a cheque for that amount. in any case, given that Japan is a prolific JGB seller, i would reckon they would just sell more of their own, rather than start selling UST.

HubbleBubbleBenLovesTrouble's picture

Problem with too much money in the system, is that you will only get rid of it, when it becomes more expensive. Which is exactly what happens when the Bernank stops buying toilet paper. While the paper will get flushed away, price of money will go up, which will impact our leveraged friends in HF's, which will eventually pull the plug out of the markets, and let's everything fall like a tombstone. QE only postponed D-day...which will come...eventually

raya123's picture

Buy SDS and DOG.

SwingForce's picture

Federal Reserve's Mandate 2011 The first & foremost objective of The Fed is to pump as much money into The Banks as it possibly can. That is the ONLY objective. Once you see this, then failure to prosecute fraud, the phony irritation that the banks aren't lending or lowering interest rates to customers, all this becomes clear. The Fed doesn't care what China does, they care that we pay our old higher-rate mortgage, and our higher-rate credit cards, because that helps The Banks. And bail out The Municipalities? Not on your life, they are not banks. Understand that The Fed is a private corporation owned by The Banks, so why do charity work for The Taxpayers? The Benbernanke has only 1 clear mandate, for as long as he's able to get away with it.

alexanderstollznow's picture

perhaps you could outline exactly how QE 'pumps money into the banks'?

ColonelCooper's picture

Are you being serious, or sarcastic?

dizzyfingers's picture

Can't understand why he's still above ground.

ak_khanna's picture


There are only three final outcomes to debt :

Part repayment part default

The FED is trying to solve the problems of excessive debt and leverage by taking on more debt and encouraging additional leverage through their bankster buddies. The ponzi scheme can only go on till the US has someone willing to lend it the money to pay the previous debts. The game stops when the cost of borrowing becomes exceptionally high or there is a shortage of lenders willing to lend.

 Madoff  Multiplied


ivana's picture

There's one more way out of debt combined with others stated and that one is available only to FED.

Destroy lenders. Destroy competition. Remain as "last bank standing"

TruthInSunshine's picture

Bernie Madoff says:

Bernank's gonna get his shit pushed in, fo sho!

JollyRoger's picture

"The monetary base has gone up by some 300% since the start of the crisis."


Quick correction:

The monetary base has increased 200%, not 300%.

bania's picture

I'm sticking with the theory the Fed will officially announce the end of QE, but will continue in stealth to monetize debt through the annuities on their massive balance sheet.  Therefore, unofficially, QE in Perpetuity.

(and when the official announcement comes ending QE, this should be a great time to load up on PMs)


poopyjim's picture

+1 This is what I think will happen as well. Even if they actually stop QE, it will be a great buying opportunity for PMs because they will capitulate eventually and turn back to the printing press. Without QE, the Ponzi collapse hastens.

Rogerwilco's picture

Aren't we forgetting something? There are over $10T sitting in various pension, 401K, and IRA accounts. That piece of driftwood must look quite tempting to Messrs. Geithner and Bernanke as they flail about in the stormy seas.

pslater's picture

The Administration has been 'taking' public comments on this for more than 18 months.  Make the only allowable 'investments' in ALL retirement accounts TIPS or a new Series R (for 'retirement') Treasury note.  Bingo, just like that, all retirement assets go to the govt.

Ever heard BHO mention that "...people's retirement shouldn't be subjected to the volatility of the stock market"?  Far better that they should have inflation protected bonds....oh, wait, who caclulates the inflation rate? /sarc off

MrSteve's picture

Some market observers have suggested taking al. your money out of government controlled retirement accounts. Pay penalties if that is required; in order to avoid a change in rules which effectively confiscates your account balance. One of those observers is Robert Prechter, who is one of the unloved (mostly) here on ZH.

ruffian's picture

IMHO Martinson is wrong....Fed will not choose rising rates and imploding risk assets. The fed will destroy this country by further fiat debasment via QE whatever # we're on.

TruthInSunshine's picture

At some point, the Fed doesn't get to choose.

As for the theory that a rollover of the Fed's balance sheet can maintain QE in anything remotely close to its current force, the math says it's not possible, and rates are already rising despite full-fledged QE policy for some time now.

Once this not-so-virtuous circle for the Bernank really takes hold, the Fed's balance sheet literally implodes.

What is the Fed going to do? Hold to maturity? Half their balance sheet (almost) is treasuries bought near record low yields.

Maybe an exogenous event like an asteroid hitting the earth will allow them to unload their treasuries for a profit.

ivana's picture

Not hold to maturity. Buyback at huge discount from distressed lenders begging for some cash

Hearst's picture

Ruffian I agree with you.  Additionally, historically, this is what all countries have done.  It is much harder this time because with the internet 'inflation expectations' can circulate the globe in seconds.


I have a few thousand saved if the end of QE is announced, but I'm not holding my breath for it.

disabledvet's picture

I agree with TD.  QE 3 already here.  "Answer" is reverse repo.  "QE is politics by another means."  Move along....

DosZap's picture



Of course its here, and its staying.

There is NO way the Fed can stop QE.

IF they did, we have two scenarios.

Default and or Bankruptcy outright.

Either way in the end it will be one or the other.

As soon as the American people start getting $0.10 worth of goods for $1.00, and no raises to compensate...........

We go HyperInflation............0-100 in a nano second.