This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: How Hyperinflation Will Happen

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by Gonzalo Lira

How Hyperinflation Will Happen

Right now, we are in the middle of deflation. The Global Depression we are experiencing has squeezed both aggregate demand levels and aggregate asset prices as never before. Since the credit crunch of September 2008, the U.S. and world economies have been slowly circling the deflationary drain.

To counter this, the U.S. government has been running massive deficits, as it seeks to prop up aggregate demand levels by way of fiscal “stimulus” spending—the classic Keynesian move, the same old prescription since donkey’s ears.

But the stimulus, apart from being slow and inefficient, has simply not been enough to offset the fall in consumer spending.

For its part, the Federal Reserve has been busy propping up all assets—including Treasuries—by way of “quantitative easing”.

The Fed is terrified of the U.S. economy falling into a deflationary death-spiral: Lack of liquidity, leading to lower prices, leading to unemployment, leading to lower consumption, leading to still lower prices, the entire economy grinding down to a halt. So the Fed has bought up assets of all kinds, in order to inject liquidity into the system, and bouy asset price levels so as to prevent this deflationary deep-freeze—and will continue to do so. After all, when your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

But this Fed policy—call it “money-printing”, call it “liquidity injections”, call it “asset price stabilization”—has been overwhelmed by the credit contraction. Just as the Federal government has been unable to fill in the fall in aggregate demand by way of stimulus, the Fed has expanded its balance sheet from some $900 billion in the Fall of ’08, to about $2.3 trillion today—but that additional $1.4 trillion has been no match for the loss of credit. At best, the Fed has been able to alleviate the worst effects of the deflation—it certainly has not turned the deflationary environment into anything resembling inflation.

Yields are low, unemployment up, CPI numbers are down (and under some metrics, negative)—in short, everything screams “deflation”.

Therefore, the notion of talking about hyperinflation now, in this current macro-economic environment, would seem . . . well . . . crazy. Right?

Wrong: I would argue that the next step down in this world-historical Global Depression which we are experiencing will be hyperinflation.

Most people dismiss the very notion of hyperinflation occurring in the United States as something only tin-foil hatters, gold-bugs, and Right-wing survivalists drool about. In fact, most sensible people don’t even bother arguing the issue at all—everyone knows that only fools bother arguing with a bigger fool.

A minority, though—and God bless ’em—actually do go ahead and go through the motions of talking to the crazies ranting about hyperinflation. These amiable souls diligently point out that in a deflationary environment—where commodity prices are more or less stable, there are downward pressures on wages, asset prices are falling, and credit markets are shrinking—inflation is impossible. Therefore, hyperinflation is even more impossible.

This outlook seems sensible—if we fall for the trap of thinking that hyperinflation is an extention of inflation. If we think that hyperinflation is simply inflation on steroids—inflation-plus—inflation with balls—then it would seem to be the case that, in our current deflationary economic environment, hyperinflation is not simply a long way off, but flat-out ridiculous.

But hyperinflation is not an extension or amplification of inflation. Inflation and hyperinflation are two very distinct animals. They look the same—because in both cases, the currency loses its purchasing power—but they are not the same.

Inflation is when the economy overheats: It’s when an economy’s consumables (labor and commodities) are so in-demand because of economic growth, coupled with an expansionist credit environment, that the consumables rise in price. This forces all goods and services to rise in price as well, so that producers can keep up with costs. It is essentially a demand-driven phenomena.

Hyperinflation is the loss of faith in the currency. Prices rise in a hyperinflationary environment just like in an inflationary environment, but they rise not because people want more money for their labor or for commodities, but because people are trying to get out of the currency. It’s not that they want more money—they want less of the currency: So they will pay anything for a good which is not the currency.

Right now, the U.S. government is indebted to about 100% of GDP, with a yearly fiscal deficit of about 10% of GDP, and no end in sight. For its part, the Federal Reserve is purchasing Treasuries, in order to finance the fiscal shortfall, both directly (the recently unveiled QE-lite) and indirectly (through the Too Big To Fail banks). The Fed is satisfying two objectives: One, supporting the government in its efforts to maintain aggregate demand levels, and two, supporting asset prices, and thereby prevent further deflationary erosion. The Fed is calculating that either path—increase in aggregate demand levels or increase in aggregate asset values—leads to the same thing: A recovery in the economy.

This recovery is not going to happen—that’s the news we’ve been getting as of late. Amid all this hopeful talk about “avoiding a double-dip”, it turns out that we didn’t avoid a double-dip—we never really managed to claw our way out of the first dip. No matter all the stimulus, no matter all the alphabet-soup liquidity windows over the past 2 years, the inescapable fact is that the economy has been—and is headed—down.

But both the Federal government and the Federal Reserve are hell-bent on using the same old tired tools to “fix the economy”—stimulus on the one hand, liquidity injections on the other. (See my discussion of The Deficit here.)

It’s those very fixes that are pulling us closer to the edge. Why? Because the economy is in no better shape than it was in September 2008—and both the Federal Reserve and the Federal government have shot their wad. They got nothin’ left, after trillions in stimulus and trillions more in balance sheet expansion—

—but they have accomplished one thing: They have undermined Treasuries. These policies have turned Treasuries into the spit-and-baling wire of the U.S. financial system—they are literally the only things holding the whole economy together.

In other words, Treasuries are now the New and Improved Toxic Asset. Everyone knows that they are overvalued, everyone knows their yields are absurd—yet everyone tiptoes around that truth as delicately as if it were a bomb. Which is actually what it is.

So this is how hyperinflation will happen:

One day—when nothing much is going on in the markets, but general nervousness is running like a low-grade fever (as has been the case for a while now)—there will be a commodities burp: A slight but sudden rise in the price of a necessary commodity, such as oil.

This will jiggle Treasury yields, as asset managers will reduce their Treasury allocations, and go into the pressured commodity, in order to catch a profit. (Actually it won’t even be the asset managers—it will be their programmed trades.) These asset managers will sell Treasuries because, effectively, it’s become the principal asset they have to sell.

It won’t be the volume of the sell-off that will pique Bernanke and the drones at the Fed—it will be the timing. It’ll happen right before a largish Treasury auction. So Bernanke and the Fed will buy Treasuries, in an effort to counteract the sell-off and maintain low yields—they want to maintain low yields in order to discourage deflation. But they’ll also want to keep the Treasury cheaply funded. QE-lite has already set the stage for direct Fed buys of Treasuries. The world didn’t end. So the Fed will feel confident as it moves forward and nips this Treasury yield jiggle in the bud.

The Fed’s buying of Treasuries will occur in such a way that it will encourage asset managers to dump even more Treasuries into the Fed’s waiting arms. This dumping of Treasuries won’t be out of fear, at least not initially. Most likely, in the first 15 minutes or so of this event, the sell-off in Treasuries will be orderly, and carried out with the idea (at the time) of picking up those selfsame Treasuries a bit cheaper down the line.

However, the Fed will interpret this sell-off as a run on Treasuries. The Fed is already attuned to the bond markets’ fear that there’s a “Treasury bubble”. So the Fed will open its liquidity windows, and buy up every Treasury in sight, precisely so as to maintain “asset price stability” and “calm the markets”.

The Too Big To Fail banks will play a crucial part in this game. See, the problem with the American Zombies is, they weren’t nationalized. They got the best bits of nationalization—total liquidity, suspension of accounting and regulatory rules—but they still get to act under their own volition, and in their own best interest. Hence their obscene bonuses, paid out in the teeth of their practical bankruptcy. Hence their lack of lending into the weakened economy. Hence their hoarding of bailout monies, and predatory business practices. They’ve understood that, to get that sweet bail-out money (and those yummy bonuses), they have had to play the Fed’s game and buy up Treasuries, and thereby help disguise the monetization of the fiscal debt that has been going on since the Fed began purchasing the toxic assets from their balance sheets in 2008.

But they don’t have to do what the Fed tells them, much less what the Treasury tells them. Since they weren’t really nationalized, they’re not under anyone’s thumb. They can do as they please—and they have boatloads of Treasuries on their balance sheets.

So the TBTF banks, on seeing this run on Treasuries, will add to the panic by acting in their own best interests: They will be among the first to step off Treasuries. They will be the bleeding edge of the wave.

Here the panic phase of the event begins: Asset managers—on seeing this massive Fed buy of Treasuries, and the American Zombies selling Treasuries, all of this happening within days of a largish Treasury auction—will dump their own Treasuries en masse. They will be aware how precarious the U.S. economy is, how over-indebted the government is, how U.S. Treasuries look a lot like Greek debt. They’re not stupid: Everyone is aware of the idea of a “Treasury bubble” making the rounds. A lot of people—myself included—think that the Fed, the Treasury and the American Zombies are colluding in a triangular trade in Treasury bonds, carrying out a de facto Stealth Monetization: The Treasury issues the debt to finance fiscal spending, the TBTF banks buy them, with money provided to them by the Fed.

Whether it’s true or not is actually beside the point—there is the widespread perception that that is what’s going on. In a panic, widespread perception is your trading strategy.

So when the Fed begins buying Treasuries full-blast to prop up their prices, these asset managers will all decide, “Time to get out of Dodge—now.”

Note how it will not be China or Japan who all of a sudden decide to get out of Treasuries—those two countries will actually be left holding the bag. Rather, it will be American and (depending on the time of day when the event happens) European asset managers who get out of Treasuries first. It will be a flash panic—much like the flash-crash of last May. The events I describe above will happen in a very short span of time—less than an hour, probably. But unlike the event in May, there will be no rebound.

Notice, too, that Treasuries will maintain their yields in the face of this sell-off, at least initially. Why? Because the Fed, so determined to maintain “price stability”, will at first prevent yields from widening—which is precisely why so many will decide to sell into the panic: The Bernanke Backstop won’t soothe the markets—rather, it will make it too tempting not to sell.

The first of the asset managers or TBTF banks who are out of Treasuries will look for a place to park their cash—obviously. Where will all this ready cash go?

Commodities.

By the end of that terrible day, commodites of all stripes—precious and industrial metals, oil, foodstuffs—will shoot the moon. But it will not be because ordinary citizens have lost faith in the dollar (that will happen in the days and weeks ahead)—it will happen because once Treasuries are not the sure store of value, where are all those money managers supposed to stick all these dollars? In a big old vault? Under the mattress? In euros?

Commodities: At the time of the panic, commodities will be perceived as the only sure store of value, if Treasuries are suddenly anathema to the market—just as Treasuries were perceived as the only sure store of value, once so many of the MBS’s and CMBS’s went sour in 2007 and 2008.

It won’t be commodity ETF’s, or derivatives—those will be dismissed (rightfully) as being even less safe than Treasuries. Unlike before the Fall of ’08, this go-around, people will pay attention to counterparty risk. So the run on commodities will be for actual, feel-it-’cause-it’s-there commodities. By the end of the day of this panic, commodities will have risen between 50% and 100%. By week’s end, we’re talking 150% to 250%. (My private guess is gold will be finessed, but silver will shoot up the most—to $100 an ounce within the week.)

Of course, once commodities start to balloon, that’s when ordinary citizens will get their first taste of hyperinflation. They’ll see it at the gas pumps.

If oil spikes from $74 to $150 in a day, and then to $300 in a matter of a week—perfectly possible, in the midst of a panic—the gallon of gasoline will go to, what: $10? $15? $20?

So what happens then? People—regular Main Street people—will be crazy to buy up commodities (heating oil, food, gasoline, whatever) and buy them now while they are still more-or-less affordable, rather than later, when that $15 gallon of gas shoots to $30 per gallon.
 
If everyone decides at roughly the same time to exchange one good—currency—for another good—commodities—what happens to the relative price of one and the relative value of the other? Easy: One soars, the other collapses.

When people freak out and begin panic-buying basic commodities, their ordinary financial assets—equities, bonds, etc.—will collapse: Everyone will be rushing to get cash, so as to turn around and buy commodities.

So immediately after the Treasury markets tank, equities will fall catastrophically, probably within the next few days following the Treasury panic. This collapse in equity prices will bring an equivalent burst in commodity prices—the second leg up, if you will.
 
This sell-off of assets in pursuit of commodities will be self-reinforcing: There won’t be anything to stop it. As it spills over into the everyday economy, regular people will panic and start unloading hard assets—durable goods, cars and trucks, houses—in order to get commodities, principally heating oil, gas and foodstuffs. In other words, real-world assets will not appreciate or even hold their value, when the hyperinflation comes.

This is something hyperinflationist-skeptics never quite seem to grasp: In hyperinflation, asset prices don’t skyrocket—they collapse, both nominally and in relation to consumable commodities. A $300,000 house falls to $60,000 or less, or better yet, 50 ounces of silver—because in a hyperinflationist episode, a house is worthless, whereas 50 bits of silver can actually buy you stuff you might need.

Right now, I’m guessing that sensible people who’ve read this far are dismissing me as being full of shit—or at least victim of my own imagination. These sensible people, if they deign to engage in the scenario I’ve outlined above, will argue that the government—be it the Fed or the Treasury or a combination thereof—will find a way to stem the panic in Treasuries (if there ever is one), and put a stop to hyperinflation (if such a foolish and outlandish notion ever came to pass in America).
 
Uh-huh: So the Government will save us, is that it? Okay, so then my question is, How?

Let’s take the Fed: How could they stop a run on Treasuries? Answer: They can’t. See, the Fed has already been shoring up Treasuries—that was their strategy in 2008—’09: Buy up toxic assets from the TBTF banks, and have them turn around and buy Treasuries instead, all the while carefully monitoring Treasuries for signs of weakness. If Treasuries now turn toxic, what’s the Fed supposed to do? Bernanke long ago ran out of ammo: He’s just waving an empty gun around. If there’s a run on Treasuries, and he starts buying them to prop them up, it’ll only give incentive to other Treasury holders to get out now while the getting’s still good. If everyone decides to get out of Treasuries, then Bernanke and the Fed can do absolutely nothing effective. They’re at the mercy of events—in fact, they have been for quite a while already. They just haven’t realized it.

Well if the Fed can’t stop this, how about the Federal government—surely they can stop this, right?

In a word, no. They certainly lack the means to prevent a run on Treasuries. And as to hyperinflation, what exactly would the Federal government do to stop it? Implement price controls? That will only give rise to a rampant black market. Put soldiers out on the street? America is too big. Squirt out more “stimulus”? Sure, pump even more currency into a rapidly hyperinflating everyday economy—right . . .

(BTW, I actually think that this last option is something the Federal government might be foolish enough to try. Some moron like Palin or Biden might well advocate this idea of helter-skelter money-printing so as to “help all hard-working Americans”. And if they carried it out, this would bring us American-made images of people using bundles of dollars to feed their chimneys. I actually don’t think that politicians are so stupid as to actually start printing money to “fight rising prices”—but hey, when it comes to stupidity, you never know how far they can go.)

In fact, the only way the Federal government might be able to ameliorate the situation is if it decided to seize control of major supermarkets and gas stations, and hand out cupon cards of some sort, for basic staples—in other words, food rationing. This might prevent riots and protect the poor, the infirm and the old—it certainly won’t change the underlying problem, which will be hyperinflation.

“This is all bloody ridiculous,” I can practically hear the hyperinflation skeptics fume. “We’re just going through what the Japanese experienced: Just like the U.S., they went into massive government stimulus—hell, they invented quantitative easing—and look what’s happened to them: Stagnation, yes—hyperinflation, no.”

That’s right: The parallels with Japan are remarkably similar—except for one key difference. Japanese sovereign debt is infinitely more stable than America’s, because in Japan, the people are savers—they own the Japanese debt. In America, the people are broke, and the Nervous Nelly banks own the debt. That’s why Japanese sovereign debt is solid, whereas American Treasuries are soap-bubble-fragile.

That’s why I think there’ll be hyperinflation in America—that bubble’s soon to pop. I’m guessing if it doesn’t happen this fall, it’ll happen next fall, without question before the end of 2011.
 
The question for us now—ad portas to this hyperinflationary event—is, what to do?

Neanderthal survivalists spend all their time thinking about post-Apocalypse America. The real trick, however, is to prepare for after the end of the Apocalypse.

The first thing to realize, of course, is that hyperinflation might well happen—but it will end. It won’t be a never-ending situation—America won’t end up like in some post-Apocalyptic, Mad Max: Beyond Thuderdome industrial wasteland/playground. Admittedly, that would be cool, but it’s not gonna happen—that’s just survivalist daydreams.

Instead, after a spell of hyperinflation, America will end up pretty much like it is today—only with a bad hangover. Actually, a hyperinflationist spell might be a good thing: It would finally clean out all the bad debts in the economy, the crap that the Fed and the Federal government refused to clean out when they had the chance in 2007–’09. It would break down and reset asset prices to more realistic levels—no more $12 million one-bedroom co-ops on the UES. And all in all, a hyperinflationist catastrophe might in the long run be better for the health of the U.S. economy and the morale of the American people, as opposed to a long drawn-out stagnation. Ask the Japanese if they would have preferred a couple-three really bad years, instead of Two Lost Decades, and the answer won’t be surprising. But I digress.

Like Rothschild said, “Buy when there’s blood on the streets.” The thing to do to prepare for hyperinflation would be to invest in a diversified hard-metal basket before the event—no equities, no ETF’s, no derivatives. If and when hyperinflation happens, and things get bad (and I mean really bad), take that hard-metal basket and—right in the teeth of the crisis—buy residential property, as well as equities in long-lasting industries; mining, pharma and chemicals especially, but no value-added companies, like tech, aerospace or industrials. The reason is, at the peak of hyperinflation, the most valuable assets will be dirt-cheap—especially equities—especially real estate.

I have no idea what will happen after we reach the point where $100 is no longer enough to buy a cup of coffee—but I do know that, after such a hyperinflationist period, there’ll be a “new dollar” or some such, with a few zeroes knocked off the old dollar, and things will slowly get back to a new normal. I have no idea the shape of that new normal. I wouldn’t be surprised if that new normal has a quasi or de facto dictatorship, and certainly some form of wage-and-price controls—I’d say it’s likely, but for now that’s not relevant.

What is relevant is, the current situation cannot long continue. The Global Depression we are in is being exacerbated by the very measures being used to fix it—stimulus is putting pressure on Treasuries, which are being shored up by the Fed. This obviously cannot have a happy ending. Therefore, the smart money prepares for what it believes is going to happen next.

I think we’re going to have hyperinflation. I hope I have managed to explain why.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:01 | 537645 kengland
kengland's picture

The inflation will come when debts are forgiven in mass. Until then...deflation bitches

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:03 | 537653 Azannoth
Azannoth's picture

REPENT!                                                (the debt)

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 17:03 | 537886 dlmaniac
dlmaniac's picture

As far as Japan goes, I think they only managed to delay the inevitable mass inflation as their savings have been drained by years of irresponsible fiscal policies. With little savings to back up that huge government debt, they are now in for either default or print as well.

 

As for hyperinflation in US, it will happen but not for very long as they'd quickly switch back to gold standard to end the madness as by then even the dumbest politicians would scream for gold standard to cover their behind.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:53 | 539313 hedgeless_horseman
hedgeless_horseman's picture

Thank you.  I appreciate both of your insights, and have learned from each of them.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:10 | 539322 tictawk
tictawk's picture

Massive Deflation will happen BEFORE Hyperinflation because the Fed CANNOT purchase all the debt out there.  The author is making the ASSumption that the Fed is in control of everything financial.   Events of the last couple of years just prove otherwise and Remember the ratio of "debt" to "cash in circulation" is 50:1.   I believe that nobody is bigger than the market and ultimately the market wins.  Politics inflate and Markets deflate.  The DEBT bubble has more latent deflationary power than all the Fed's ability to print.  The Fed is a pimple on the ass of a $100+ trillion dollar debt bubble and Bernanke is the prick that will burst it. A dash for the exits from any large bond holder will be enough to raise interest rates at the long end (remember the Fed does not control the long end, it can only influence it over the short term) making the debt burden untenable.  The spread between the long and short end will widen incredibly to a point where borrowing will cease and Cash will be king.  After a period where a significant amout of existing debt has been reconciled via default, restructuring or paydown, it might be politically expedient to inflate the rest but I doubt it.  I think once borrowing and lending cease, the Fed will be forced to make the dollar a hard currency in order to attract capital to our shores. 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:36 | 539365 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

hahaha, just when we though we might have made some progress with these deflationists along comes this tool.

If the economy contracts as much as you say it will, there will be no tax revenue to service the debt. The dollar is backed by this debt. The dollar will sell off as fast as the bond bubble bursts.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:14 | 539393 tictawk
tictawk's picture

The dollar is NOT backed by anything (it is fiat) but is a debt instrument.  It is a Debt based fiat currency.  There aren't enough dollars to satisfy the outstanding debt.  What is it that you don't understand about debt:cash ratio of 50:1?  Debt/credit is not the same as cash.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:30 | 539410 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

The dollar is backed by the full faith and CREDIT of the US government.

^I didn't make that up.

Why did the Euro inflate when it was on the cusp of debt destruction then ?

Why didn't the Euro gain in value(DEFLATION) when Greece was unable to service its debt ?

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 08:44 | 539774 ATG
ATG's picture

The dollar and the euro have two quite different central bank objectives and backings.

The primary objective of the ECB is to maintain price stability across the EEC, not in each member state.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Central_Bank

The Fed has multiple and sometimes conflicting objectives, including maximum employment, moderate interest rates, stable prices, averting financial panics and strengthening the US Economy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System

Meanwhile, the EC has far more gold than the USA and any other regional bloc in the world...

http://www.gata.org/node/104

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:20 | 539401 kengland
kengland's picture

What other liquid assets are there to buy? The world is drowning in dollars. CB's need the liquidity for a myriad of reasons. The debts of the world are net denominated in dollars. How are they going to pay those debts back? Yen?  Revenues or no revenues, they will covet the dollars until they can't.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 01:09 | 539448 tictawk
tictawk's picture

@kengland

"the world is drowning in dollars"

No the world is drowning in dollar denominated debt, i.e. dollar denominated IOUs that need to be satisfied with dollars /cash.   Debt / cash in circulation ratio = 50:1

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:43 | 537924 ATG
ATG's picture

Lord spare us from would-be Italian filmmakers and writers who, with limited market experience, somehow think they are smarter than Fed, 0 Advisers and Wall Street, who already made a muck of things with their failed national socialist central planning agenda.

There is absolutely no hyperfinflation evident like the Revolutionary War Continentals or Civil War Greenbacks. Zero. Zilch. No hedge.

M3 is -8%, the adjusted monetary base growth is -90%, total credit is declining at -9%, the real cost of mortgage money is the -35% decline in real estate plus the nominal 5% on mortgages, or 40%, and the money multiplier is less than 1, losing 15 cents for each additional dollar the Fed creates trying to prop up dead mortgages and insolvent Treasuries.

The Fed well knows if it monetizes all Treasury liquiditions, every banker, CEO or CFO will be dragged out of their corporate jet easy chair and crashed, defenestrated or piked.

Rather, the tipoff to any repudiation of the dollar will be interest rates going crazy as people sell everything in a mad dash scramble for cash.

Every single hyperinflation was preceded by runaway interest rates, from Argentina to Zimbabwe.

Meanwhile the 83 cent currency-weighted dollar is targeting 115 after a respite from 70.70 and 80.08 lows, still shy of 120 in 2001 before endless imperial wars became neoCon policy for both parties with their CIA candidates...

http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?%24usd

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:58 | 537991 Eternal Student
Eternal Student's picture

"Smarter than the Fed"? That's hilarious! You mean you're in awe of the same group who not only caused this mess, but couldn't see the disaster of 2008?

Goodness, man. My grandmother is smarter than the Fed, and she's been dead for over 20 years.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:21 | 538055 ATG
ATG's picture

Learn to read...

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 17:09 | 538617 Eternal Student
Eternal Student's picture

Sorry, but by your "Lord spare us from" comment I was under the apparently silly impression that you didn't like non-PhD Economists. I'll take them any day over those with PhD's. That includes the disparaged "Italian filmmakers and writers ... with limited market experience". Even a monkey with a dartboard is probably preferable.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 08:56 | 539810 ATG
ATG's picture

Fed, 0 Advisers and Wall Street, who already made a muck of things with their failed national socialist central planning agenda.

Usually, integrity and values more important than intelligence.

Anyone who understands Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson, may appreciate better economics than most PhD government economists, who create more blowback with central planning, than common sense practical Constitutional workable economic solutions like uniform taxes, gold and silver money, limited government and the protection of private property.

Anyone who thinks they can predict the markets to a T is kidding themeselves, as ZH comments and 0 Economists proved time and again, with their failed No more than 8% unemployment forecast...

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:12 | 538947 Bendromeda Strain
Bendromeda Strain's picture

He did. You said "somehow think they are smarter than 0 advisors". Once you stick a fork in Orszag and Romer, you are left with Summers, because we know he isn't listening to Volcker.

I'll take Sergio Leone over that crew...

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 08:59 | 539819 ATG
ATG's picture

Me too.

The present author is no Sergio Leone or Clint Eastwood, yet...

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001466/

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:48 | 538183 GoinFawr
GoinFawr's picture

M3 this, M3 that.

LvMises says,

"Hunh."

M2, TMS

Regards

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:08 | 538791 technovelist
technovelist's picture

The US hyperinflation will be accompanied by runaway interest rates, as the Fed becomes the only purchaser of Treasurys. I'm betting they won't stop before they destroy the dollar, as if they do make any attempt even to slow down the rate of purchase, it will cause a deflationary crash to appear immediately, which will cause them to panic and open the spigots wide.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:43 | 539293 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

well who buys the treasuries besides the FED during this dump off?  Why does the FED have to buy them?  They make the market since they are the only bidder.  So they can IGNORE all the ones the banks and asset managers are trying to dump...  NO SALE..    BUT the price of the new treasuries can continue as before since the buying is totally rigged anyway...

 

you are going to have to be more of a con man to con these cons

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 02:11 | 539488 bigkahuna
bigkahuna's picture

you are going to have to be more of a con man to con these cons

That is the best way I have seen that stated. People just do not get that though. I tell people all the time that everything down to legal tender laws will be, as a previous commenter said, defenestrated, meaning "thrown out the window". We are so darn crafty to be ahead of the wave of people who will be blind-sided by all of this, but even most on this forum do not understand that the rules are optional right now--and they will certainly not be followed during ANY kind of destabilization. People think they will be able to use dollars to pay for anything? Including a mortgage? Nope. The bank is just going to say, "We'd rather take your house/land/car/whatever". This will get very ugly if/when it happens.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 04:16 | 539568 mophead
mophead's picture

Aren't you over stating things? It doesn't take everyone to dump their treasurys to cause a collapse, no more than it takes a few traders to pump up a stock. There will likely be enough buyers and sellers to crash the treasury bond market.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:25 | 538838 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Dude...let's take a step back and look at this.  Deflationists seem to miss the forest for the trees.

The USG is the most heavily indebted entity on the planet.  How would THEY be able to tolerate deflation?  It'd kill them as surely as it nearly killed every levered player in 2008.

The USG can incontrovertibly not repay ITS debts.  How the hell can the FRN maintain worth in the face of that?  I understand that the "math" says that the FRN becomes more worthful as deflation sets in, but this simply defies any common sense or intelligence, because the FRN is the note of a bankrupt sovereign and a bankrupt central bank.  Only in bizarro world can that become more worthful.

Eventually as deflation continues to grind, confidence in the FRN will evaporate.  Military or not.  Nukes or not.  Reserve currency or not.  And then it is all over in a heartbeat.

Is that TODAY?  No.  Obviously not.  Is it coming?  Of course, just as surely as a Pound Sterling is a fraction of a pound now (11 pounds to the ozt of Ag) despite the UK having suffered "deflation" in the 1930s and god remembers how many wars and the South Seas bubble and all that shit along the way.

The Pound's march toward ever-smaller fractions of an ACTUAL pound of sterling silver has been RELENTLESS.  So shall it be with the dollar.  By hook or by crook man.

Study freakin history.  Deflation precedes devaluation as surely as night follows day.  It is the ONLY way to make the math work.  I marvel at precious dollar FRNbugs, I really do, thinking that this time will be different from every other time in history and the FRN will simply live forever.  It won't.

So, you can either prepare now for that or try to be a vulture and pick up wallets and cellphones and watches DURING the panic stampede out of the burning nightclub.  FRNbugs must fancy that there is some exit that the rest of the patrons don't know about, or that they are fireproof, or Batman.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:49 | 538903 boiow
boiow's picture

well said,  that man.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:12 | 538945 sid farkas
sid farkas's picture

I feel bad for you son...

The economy's got 99 problems and inflation ain't one.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:57 | 539234 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

I can tell by that comment that you have a mind that is not well suited for investing. You are one of those people that cant precive time. Your mind is always in the now, it is stuck there. You are fucked up

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:03 | 539239 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

well, i don't know about that.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:22 | 539263 sid farkas
sid farkas's picture

Yeah, that's why I rode the gold bull from '03-'09. Now I'm long USD, you'll realize I was right in about 6 months, until then there's no point in arguing.

I pity the gold bugs that are about to lose their ass, but I see there's nothing I can do to help.

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:29 | 539270 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

Well, Sid, differing opinions make a market.

Thank you for selling me your gold. Lose my ass or not, I'm glad I have it.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:18 | 539348 w a l k - a w a y
w a l k - a w a y's picture

well said Mr. Ferguson

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:44 | 539377 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

The real unmolested low for gold, when you discount Gordon Brown dumping the UK gold like shit, was about $480 to $500.

So you think that a price that goes from $500 to $1200 over 10 years is an over heated market ?

Is that really bubble territory in your mind ?

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:59 | 539434 sid farkas
sid farkas's picture

Overheated, not one bit, gold doesn't change in value (much). Saying that gold has gone from 500 to 1200 is really saying the USD lost value. I was long PM's to be short USD, but I don't think USD will lose anymore value over the next few years due to a reduced supply of dollars (i.e. deflation).

My current shorts on PM's (among other shorts) are a way to be long dollars against something of constant value. It really says nothing about my view of gold.

 

While I hold austrian school in high regard I don't think they got everything right. Specifically I disagree with their definition of money. If you want to calculate real interest rates I think M3 is closest to the true definition of money. We'll see shortly, if you use M1 or M2 or TMS you're going to come to the conclusion that real interest rates are low or negative, in which case long gold would be a great idea. I use something close to M3 which leads me to the conclusion that real interest rates are positive (and pretty high), which tells me I should be long USD.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 07:16 | 539626 Escapeclaws
Escapeclaws's picture

Sid, I'd be interested to hear what you have to say about gold vs euro. Currently, gold seems to be in perfect negative correlation with the euro. Does that mean that real euro interest rates are negative?

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 08:00 | 539670 sid farkas
sid farkas's picture

I'm no expert on the euro, but it seems like there is a whole lot more going on over there which you would need to take into account.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:46 | 539375 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

"I can tell by that comment that you have a mind that is not well suited for investing. You are one of those people that cant precive time. Your mind is always in the now, it is stuck there. You are fucked up"

 

 

I am not in a position to comment, but that may be the funniest thing to come out of your spitzer in a while. LMAO

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:00 | 539386 RaymondKHessel
RaymondKHessel's picture

99? That's it?

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:08 | 539145 wake the roach
wake the roach's picture

Deflation precedes devaluation as surely as night follows day.

 

Yes, and this is because modern economic ideology does not appreciate the fact that the value of money is determined by each monetary units energy value (the slice of the energy pie, energy consumption that allows the production and exchange of goods and services within an economy). 

Deflation is a loss of energy value per monetary unit (purchasing power) just as inflation is.

Both are a loss of energy value per monetary unit as a result of the increase (inflation) or decrease (deflation) in the total supply of monetary units  within an economy, without a relative increase or decrease in the supply and consumption of energy within an economy (as a result of overproduction or as a result of a nominal increase in the price of energy, pick your cause, energy supply or demand?).

However, it is only through the destruction of these non existent fantasy monetary units known as credits that gives the word deflation any meaning to us at all. Yes, when credit units are destroyed, the real energy value that each credit "represented" is transferred to the pure money supply.

This increase in the energy value of the base money supply via deflation can only be maintained if it once again leads to a sufficient increase in economic activity (energy consumption) that allows the total money supply to return to its previous energy/credit equilibrium and within a time frame that does not lead to a  further serious fall in economic activity (reduced economic activity=reduced energy consumption per monetary unit= less energy value/mon-unit=inflation).

But, if the destruction of debt on balance sheets does not occur allowing asset prices to fall to regain a monetary energy value equilibrium that leads to real economic growth (energy consumption and so increased demand for credit units), people will begin to lose faith in ever regaining the market value paid for the assets they purchased with credit.

Hyperinflation is as much as a result of a loss in faith of asset values as it is the loss of faith in the value of the currency. Obviously, this trend is picking up momentum.

I rushed this explanation but I hope it made sense to someone besides myself and Frederick Soddys ghost. Hyperinflation is assured unless the public has trust that the assets they purchased with credit will regain the previous real market value, or unless uncle Ben can somehow increase the supply and thus lower the nominal price of energy to the point that sustained the previous two decades of credit bubble growth (economic growth can only be produced through an increase in energy consumption, or an icrease in energy efficiency)

Oh, and Mr. Lira mentioned the distribution of credits/ration cards . THAT IS THE END GAME! And let me add that these credits will be given purchasing power not by the energy value each credit buys, but by the carbon units each credit buys. Welcome to the new world folks, if we don't blow the world to hell first.

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:08 | 539249 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

i get what your sayin.

I have some issues with the reasons you think people will lose faith in the currency unit. The spenders in the closed economy will not have as much of an effect on the loss of value of the unit of currency as the holders of debt denominated in the currency will.The debt holders will get the ball rolling before the peasants in the closed economy knew what happened.

 

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:52 | 539364 wake the roach
wake the roach's picture

Yes I agree with you... I've already waxed the old longboard, all set for the bond mega tsunami ... Just trying to make a point on deflation but I have always been a useless writer ;-).

 

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 02:17 | 539495 superuser
superuser's picture

This is after a few glasses of wine, so please be gentle (I realize that's not possible on ZH).

Based on your first sentence, are you assuming "energy" = consumption towards some production of a "useful asset"? i'm a bit of a plebe, but if that's your definition of "energy," then doesn't pretty much the consumption of "pure entertainment" shrink your "energy pie?" And if that's the case, don't things like virtual goods accelerate deflation at an even more rapid pace, assuming they gain scale (give a signal) w/o mass adoption (not sustainable)? Sounds like our economy for the past n years...but I'm a plebe.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:46 | 539422 BobWatNorCal
BobWatNorCal's picture

No, I think he has a point.
Inflation: economy running too hot.
Hyper-inflation: everyone trying to get out of fiat currency.
The trigger could be widespread collapse of CRE, causing a domino of regional bank failures, the FDIC is overwhelmed and payoffs are slow.
People withdraw from weak banks, the domino becomes a firestorm, and we've reached the 3rd gate of financial Hell.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 08:11 | 539686 The Alarmist
The Alarmist's picture

I dunno ... there is potential energy and there is kinetic energy. 

Inflation is like when you pour a little more water into the glass and thereby increase the potential energy.  Hyperinflation is when you break the glass and find yourself awash in cash that you wish could be contained rather than simply sloshing all around anything that will hold it.

Wait ... maybe inflation is like an electron jumping from one orbit to another ... same mass, but perhaps a different charge to that atom.  Hyperinflation is when the whole atom breaks apart.

Nah ... never mind. Too theoretical for me.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 09:04 | 539833 ATG
ATG's picture

They may have no choice.

Markets are bigger than the Fed and government,

as derivatives already proved several times in panics.

Unfunded agency mandate liabilities dwarfing the GDP may be about to prove that again,

with default, not inflation.

Repossession is not inflationary... 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:45 | 539208 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Are you aware that we need no money printing and no QE to have hyperinflation ? Looks like not..

When the treasury goes bust because the real economy cannot service the debt, the dollar will go bust. Its that simple.

If there was no bailout in 08, the dollar would have been done by May of 09

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:55 | 539228 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

yup

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 09:22 | 539876 ATG
ATG's picture

Spitz, arrogant tone does not become you or cover up for lacunae.

Maybe you could tell us how many dollars are actually in circulation, as opposed to virtual credits on the internet that can disappear with the flick of a switch?

Hint: currently a whole lot lot less than inflationary amounts, less than a trillion in a $14 T GDP.

In fact, the average life of a paper dollar is 21 months.

The reason Jefferson and other founding fathers feared Central Banks was their ability to inflate the economy with debt, and then secretly deflate and foreclose it for controlling ownership.

That's what the IMF and World Bank did with a large part of the world, coming soon to a country near US.

Bailouts and stim programs only accelerate the process.

Every inflation since 1776 relied on the dollar as de facto currency when times got tough and dollars got scarce. Argentina, China, Germany, Hungray, Japan, Mexico, Thailand, Vietnam and Zimbabwe were no exception.

Assuming the Fed can and will print its way out of trouble indefinitely might be quite an expensive portfolio mistake.

Currently, all money supplies are slowing or contracting, and the USD is targeting 115, hardly the harbinger of inflation, let alone hyperinflation...

http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?s=%24usd

 

 

 

 

 

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 10:32 | 540118 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Tell me how the U.S. will service its sovereign debt in your scenario.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 16:43 | 541292 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

I would like an answer to this too.

Fri, 08/27/2010 - 10:16 | 541426 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

hey seet pea do you think we can get up to a 1000, and celebrate with a party? i will help and leave lots of dumb and stupid comments about off topic things of course.

Wed, 08/25/2010 - 14:26 | 543601 ATG
ATG's picture

Even Morgan Stanley says we cannot service sovereign debt.

The Fed and Treasury already failed to reinflate the economy.

Pushing on a string twice in two years may not work,

why 0 advisers jumping the ship of state.

Debt default deflationary for gold, benefits scarce paper dollar cash in hand.

Do an experiment: Ask your bank to give you your full balance in cash.

See what happens. Lots of hems and haws and government forms.

Then dirty old tattered bills, not new.

Cash is disappearing...

 

Fri, 08/27/2010 - 08:45 | 547844 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Now tell me what happens to USD when U.S. can't service sovereign debt.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:05 | 537661 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

You can't forgive debt. That would be communisme!

Debt will inflate also. Mark my words.

In Germany, the people who had debt still had debt. It only got worse.

That's why the weimar period got us to WOII. People where really giving up.

Hitler was their only hope, and that's why they follow him en masse.

And in that point of view, I understand completely. I think everybody here would have followed him.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:29 | 537882 dlmaniac
dlmaniac's picture

As far as Japan goes, I think they only managed to delay the inevitable mass inflation as their savings have been drained by years of irresponsible fiscal policies. With little savings to back up that huge government debt, they are now in for either default or print as well.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:26 | 537703 redpill
redpill's picture

lebensraum, bitchez!

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 16:24 | 538494 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

But which way will the U.S. aim their elbow?  Mexico, Venezuela, or Iran? 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:58 | 537792 A Nanny Moose
A Nanny Moose's picture

"I think everybody here would have followed him." As in everybody here on ZH? Or everybody in the US? 

Perhaps so, but "Everybody" is a bit of a stretch, isn't it? Even now, I have trouble reconizing any authority which is dishonest, coercive, and divisive, and must wrap everything in fear to chase its people into the loving arms of the high priests, who will make it all magically go away.

I believe that people so depise Hitler, in hindsight, because they fear their own capacity to follow such a man. This is the real horror. Even still, there were some in Hitler's own inner circle, who hated, and tried to destroy him.

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:16 | 539214 Incubus
Incubus's picture

of course the lemmings in this country would follow him.  These downies don't care about policy, they just want a show, they want charisma, Hitler would have them all chanting, in unison:

Ja wir können

Ja wir können

Ja wir können

!! I used google translator, so I don't know if it's correct, but you get the idea.  You can't expect much out of large groups of people, more specifically,  populations of nations. Address them individually or in smaller groups, you might get somewhere --otherwise, it's all about herding them in the direction you want, and you do it by song & dance, lightshows, entertain them and speak with a silver tongue, and they'll love whatever you tell them, they'll follow you anywhere, eagerly accept any policy. 

Just say that you'll save them, or protect them, ease their pains, whatever, just make it sound good--the wide-eyed masses will give you anything.

 

 


Tue, 08/24/2010 - 07:21 | 539629 Escapeclaws
Escapeclaws's picture

Hail Obama!

If we just make the Bush tax cuts permanent, that will save the economy.

Hail Obama!

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 07:52 | 539657 MaximumPig
MaximumPig's picture

If you have any doubt that it people would and do follow racist demagogues, try building a mosque anywhere in the US.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 08:12 | 539691 The Alarmist
The Alarmist's picture

Start by looking on Martha's Vineyard.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:59 | 537797 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Um..I think the hyperinflation event in Weimar Germany had a little bit to do with industrialists in the Ruhr Valley who were blocking wage/labor reforms and ended up getting their industrial heartland occupied by the French - which hampered their ability to pay reparations and thus caused the system set up by the US to go haywire. Slightly different situation now. Yes, I agree that a hyperinflation event is possible in the US - but not for the same reasons as Weimar.

Also sorry to be contrary on your analysis of everyone following Hitler in the states - that was also just not true. While radio evangelists like Charles Coughlin were certainly beating the drum for Hitler to a wide audience, just as large groups protested in US major cities throughout the early 1930s. I know ZH readers like to paint the New Deal as completely ineffective - but a lot of people were too busy building roads and national parks to be too concerned about the Third Reich.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:25 | 537867 EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

The central government refused to cut the deficit as it would have led to mass unemployment. With limited access to debt markets following WW1, the Germans resorted to printing.

There's a bit more to it than the reparations. In fact, inflation was already very high, when reparations kicked in.

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:24 | 538058 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

My point is that there were more than economic causes for Weimar hyperinflation. There were also unique historical reasons which make comparing Weimar to the US now a bit of a stretch.

Even talking about the Weimar "central government" needs a few qualifiers. This was a shaky coalition that did not have much of a choice when if came to creating stability and employment. 'Refuse' is not a word I would use.

In this analysis I am still going to side with J. Freiherr Kruedener, who stated, "It was no so much the objective result of the depreciation of the currency up to 1922, especially the consequences of its distribution, but rather, its subjective effect, and above all its effects on everyday life in the wild year 1923 [ie touched off by the Ruhr crisis], which allowed to come into being the trauma which for a long time afterwards narrowed the scope for decision-making in German economic and financial policy."

why am I harping on this? because I observe a decent amount of history re-writing on ZH - especially when it comes to throwing around Weimar.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 15:54 | 538373 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

Truly. There is NO comparison to anything, including Argentina 2001.

Americans are obese and malnourished, simultaneously! Millions commute for an hour or more. Families are separated and neighbors hardly know each other. There is every sort of previously unimaginable addiction. Individuals that need the pharma will go without and become unhinged.

How do you ration what will diminish in availability because it just isn't produced inside US borders anymore? All those "essentials" won't be available, not to mention life-sustaining materials.

How, Mr. Lira, how do you avoid mass starvation? What set of unprecedented inputs do you include in your analysis and what progression of events do you envision to reach your irrational conclusion that we will "make it through"?

No, we won't make it through. The Neanderthals will be safe and well fed, however. Their seed will be passed on. Ironic, no? Do you happen to have a PhD, Mr. Lira?

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 17:28 | 538680 johnnynaps
johnnynaps's picture

This one is too easy to answer! There are 2.2 MILLION farms in the US. The average farm is 400 ACRES! I don't think starvation for the entire population is in the cards unless there is some climate catastrophe or nuclear war!

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 17:44 | 538716 Citxmech
Citxmech's picture

...and if diesel runs up to $20/gallon, what happens next?

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 20:17 | 539069 johnnynaps
johnnynaps's picture

Then the dollar menu becomes the 3 dollar menu, and the barter system/black market thrives! Gas more than tripled in price before, and my McDonalds Double Cheeseburger price stayed the same!

Fortunately for the US, we export a shit-load wheat and corn to nations that dictate/control oil. If I was a gambling man, I would bet that we need oil less than they need food!

Also, don't forget that the dollar is the reserve currency. Not too many countries, if any, will survive the type of dollar crash we are talking about here. Luckily for us here on the mainland, we have resources!

 

 

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 10:26 | 540088 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

Luckily for us here on the mainland, we have resources!

Also, don't forget that their price won't be in FRN$.

Katrina was that little drop of rain on your nose. Those look like very dark clouds.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:58 | 539017 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

The FRN$ is the climate, in this case. Or a nuclear warhead. Whichever analogy you prefer.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 20:20 | 539075 Thomas
Thomas's picture

Distribution of food can become very haphazard. For example, during the depression we were remarkably ineffectual at using the "land of plenty" to feed the folks.

PS-Adam Ferguson traces German inflation back much earlier than reparations and suggests reparations are a total red herring.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:02 | 539144 -1Delta
-1Delta's picture

cmon.. starvation... seriously we pay farmers not to farm

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:15 | 539397 Things that go bump
Things that go bump's picture

Yes, and to prop up food prices during the depression they dumped milk and slaughtered pigs and burned the carcasses.   Farmers dumped trucks full of oranges in the fields and poured oil over them so that they were inedible and there were people going hungry.  There is a famous picture of a dirty-faced skinny woman sitting with her two dirty skinny little girls hanging on her, and she told the photographer that they had been trying to dig frozen turnips out of a field for something to eat.    

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 10:25 | 540077 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

did you know that KROGERs has a policy of throwing away, not giving to poor or homeless, any fruit that might just have a nick, cut or bruise from a customers finger nail or key. they constantly go through all fruit or other fresh produce and just throw it away. company policy throughout all of their chains, king soopers, city markets etc. supposedly health reasons. boxes of pears a day.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 12:20 | 540508 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

Because some poor person would buy a litigation lottery ticket and sue them for an upset stomach.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 17:31 | 541438 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

hey, that is what is all about. the system is broke.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:36 | 538120 wareco
wareco's picture

According to O. Parssons, (google him if you never heard of him) Germany, from the end of the war to the end of the inflationary period only paid 2.4B gold marks as reparations, which was just about 5% of one-years GDP.  Reparations was not the catalyst for Germany's hyperinflation.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:39 | 538133 wareco
wareco's picture

Oops, actual name is Jens O. Parsson.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 16:04 | 538434 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Again, I never said reparations were the only catalyst. I said the Ruhr crisis was. This event, of course, involved reparations - but this was only one among many reasons.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 16:08 | 538444 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Also - Germany was paying reparations in ore and timber - not just gold. The halting of these shipments to France was the reason the Ruhr was occupied in 1923.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:39 | 537916 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

"You can't forgive debt. That would be communisme!"

You know, I always knew that Bono character was a pinko...


Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:47 | 537948 DosZap
DosZap's picture

SD,

"I think everybody here would have followed him".

No, the people here, the vast majority will be the one's snagging real estate for pennies on the buck.Or, if smart, leaving enmasse............no one want's a Chavezite Gv't here, after HIS scenario, Here, there would be a Civil War.

Many people did not follow him, they knew what he was, and his agenda,that's why the Brownshirts, and the SS were formed.

To drag away the non participants in the lie.

They will be the one's with Gold & Silver in HAND.

They will be the one's that stocked up, and looked ahead.

WE see the signs.

Anyone who does not prepare for this, even the remote  CHANCE for it, is a Fool.

And will deserve what hit's them, sadly their families will not,but they will be the recipients of a severe fudgepacking.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:12 | 538029 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

Imagine you lost everything.

You can't feed your children

Your wife needs to prostitute herself to get some food on the table

And that goes on for years to come.

 

Suddenly: There comes a man who says: I'll FIX it all! (1933)

The next years  that came till 1940 (7 years) ALL WAS IMPROVING

Everybody got a job, Everybody could feed their children again.

And the man that did it, is the same man you would hate?

Right...

I understand why Germans followed him.

If you don't, you don't mind letting your wife get fucked by strangers, let your children starve. Because.... you're that kind of man right?

WRONG

You would follow him to.

And I'm not saying Hitler was right in our eyes, because you clearly can't make the differnce.

And if you ask me: If people here on ZH would follow. I say: 99%

Hitler didn't start killing jews or other people till 41 and most germans didn't even know.

And to make it a bit easier: Bush ingaged America into so many wars, fighting almost everybody. He killed millions.

Do you know there are European countries that wanted him on trial at Geneva?

And if you would respond: I wasn't for bush: Did you protest? Did you say: I will quit being a American?

Guess not.

Don't act like your a saint. Nobody is, and he who says he is: I don't trust him. AT ALL!

And for your information: In my family, 3 men died in that war. And when you're German, you'd better not show op in my house.

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 17:18 | 538656 merehuman
merehuman's picture

junked you on account i am german in the USA since age 12 in 63. Been in the US army. Willing to fight for this country, protect you and yours, would share my food with you and never care where you are from.

So you would shoot me , your neighbor more or less? Where are you from...

Jews presently run and ruin our country. They have hurt our country repeatedly as well as other countries. There are jews in my community and they are welcome in my house. It aint the race dude, its the character.

I love you just the same

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:04 | 538928 boiow
boiow's picture

too true.  the german race learned a great lesson because of hitler and won,t be repeating it anytime soon. i know a lot of germans ( my girlfriend and her family) . anyway for a laugh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-Xvy1r4Pm8

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 12:25 | 540528 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

The ultra-rich ruling class who suckle on the govt teat, robbing the middle class are the enemy.  Who gives a fuck how many might be Jewish, Persian, Irish, or English?

Sick of you racist assholes diverting attention to a single race versus the ruling class.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 20:22 | 539083 Thomas
Thomas's picture

If my wife needs to prostitute herself for food, we are gonna starve.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:37 | 539195 hungrydweller
hungrydweller's picture

Not if she looks like your avatar!

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:42 | 539415 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

deleted for inappropriateness

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:44 | 539206 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Does this mean you wouldn't let her? Or does it mean, I don't mean to be rude, that she is not the type to do it, or cannot do it, or make a market for her services (lacks skill set or how she presents herself)? You would be shocked at the people who can make a living in this manner. If you can suck, you can make a buck.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:54 | 539227 merehuman
merehuman's picture

Hoover, bitches!

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:12 | 539253 dukeness
dukeness's picture

Eureka bitchez to that!

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 00:49 | 539419 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

"Does this mean you wouldn't let her? Or does it mean, I don't mean to be rude, that she is not the type to do it, or cannot do it, or make a market for her services (lacks skill set or how she presents herself)? You would be shocked at the people who can make a living in this manner. If you can suck, you can make a buck."

 

 

Only if you can enjoy it too - you little MsCreant.  I'm sorry if I scared you.

 

fwitw - If I was left with the choice of having to prostitute myself out to woman for food, or cigarettes, I would have to do it.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 02:30 | 539505 aka_ces
aka_ces's picture

or, blow/dough.  

Talk about (hyper?)inflation.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:28 | 539356 Auric Goldfinger
Auric Goldfinger's picture

+10

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 17:33 | 541445 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

well said thomas. if it was up to me to bring home the bread, it would be suck for a buck.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:56 | 538210 Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

The anti-democracy power elite of Germany who backed Hitler and fascist gangs from the very beginning engineered the collapse of Weimar. Hyperinflation was the byproduct of loss of faith in the currency AND the government. 

The power elite were the old German aristocracy, still very much in power, still holding land and controlling industry , with most Germans working for them as poor tenant farmers since feudal times. There had never been anything but aristocratic rule in Germany for centuries until 1919, just 4 years before the start of hyperinflation. There had never even been a nation known as Germany until the German Empire in 1871. 

The threat to the elite was the communist insurgency in Germany of 1918-1919 which threatened to seize aristocratic property. Entire regions of Germany became communist. The aristocrats wanted to end democracy and all threats to their power and wealth. They wanted a return to the old ways. Hitler played into their game with radical anti-democratic ideals and anti-communism. He used his armed gangs. Regular people elected him out of fear, confusion and a belief that democracy can't succeed. 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 17:36 | 538697 TrulyStupid
TrulyStupid's picture

He was backed by the farmers, the industrial workers and the provinces. Derided by urban sophisticates (like Berliners) as the "bavarian corporal", he rose from the blue collar beer halls. His anti-semitism was in part anti-bank (Jewish families were prominent in banking then) and pre-dated by his anti-communist, anti-socialist, anti-intelluctal, anti-liberal, anti-immigrant, anti-handicapped and homophobic rantings.

Anyone out there in America trying to fill his shoes?

 

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:05 | 538930 Snake
Snake's picture

... tea anybody?

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 01:26 | 539466 aka_ces
aka_ces's picture

Recall that Hitler never received a majority of votes from the  German people. 

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 09:27 | 539900 Lednbrass
Lednbrass's picture

Yep, you cant ignore the Civil War which followed the end of WW1.  Communist revolutions occured in several parts of Germany (Kiel revolts, Spartacist revolt in Berlin, Munich Soviet, Red Army of the Ruhr) whose stated goal was to wipe out the middle class along with the power elite- mass arrests of anyone deemed bourgoise were not uncommon and in Munich there were quite a few executions.  The issues were not just monetary, there were political and cultural divisions too big to ignore.

This is also the case here in the US, this is of course a financial site and there is a definite tendency to see events through a prism of charts and graphs but the larger social picture cant be ignored.  The readership here amongst Americans has a definite urban and northeastern slant, but don't forget there are tens of millions of heavily armed people below the Mason Dixon who don't want to share a country with the likes of New York, Massachusetts, Illinois, and California under the best of circumstances. The only thing holding this country together has been a mutual liking of having lots of things and cool toys- once the financial system unwinds and that disappears I fully expect secession and I dont think the northeastern and left coast urbanites will be able to do a thing about it.

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:40 | 538880 trav7777
trav7777's picture

What was so bad about Hitler compared to all the other leaders back then?  He didn't do anything the rest of them wouldn't and didn't do.  Germany wanted rid of their banking clan and all their cousins.  Had Ben Gurion not been interested in making a political play for international recognition, they all would have moved to palestine.

Now, it turns out that Germany has a saner fiscal posture and policy, is not a warmongering imperial nation, they've gotten back to essentially protestant values of work and community.  They are one of the pillars of stability now in the world.  Nations with large tribe contingents are still warmongering and running confetti ponzis.

I mean, how many Germans did WE kill?  How many did the Soviets?  It was bad to be a polish woman during any part of this war, and the Soviets invaded, occupied and pillaged most of eastern europe for 40 years after the war.  Looking at the relative carnage, Hitler just doesn't make the grade as far as psychopathic dictators go, not compared to some of his contemporaries and many others throughout history.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 20:21 | 539082 unununium
unununium's picture

"In Germany, the people who had debt still had debt. It only got worse."

 

Factually incorrect.

 

Debts, and therefore savings, were inflated away in Weimar Germany.  This destabilized the country and sidelined many of the more stable elements of society.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:30 | 537709 Vampyroteuthis ...
Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

Kengland....... we have a winner!!! After debts are defaulted upon, then it is hyperinflation bitchez.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:37 | 537910 Steaming_Wookie_Doo
Steaming_Wookie_Doo's picture

I for one welcome our Hyperinflationary Ant Overlords.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 15:25 | 538308 masterinchancery
masterinchancery's picture

Another asset to hold is "hard" currencies, if you can find any.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 16:27 | 538506 MrSteve
MrSteve's picture

Master, beware that a global reserve currency bust might take out all paper currencies. Otherwise, hard assets would be converted into ever-decreasing-value paper holdings. Gresham's Law will kick in big time and all good money will be held while the trash circulates.   A look a Twigg's Money Flow indicator shows outflows from all global bourses, except India right now. The whole world's stock markets are moving like one, following the pressure of the global reserve currency. Your only alternative is PM.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:44 | 539000 bruiserND
bruiserND's picture

$5,000 an OZ gold will have it's own triggers.

 http://www.tavakolistructuredfinance.com/Gold.pdf

 

Although no one knows exactly when we all know there will be a reckoning very soon that will forever change the world.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 20:13 | 539056 Moneygrove
Moneygrove's picture

+ 1 Trillion !!!!!!

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 21:27 | 539180 rawsienna
rawsienna's picture

correct

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 22:43 | 539294 Gully Foyle
Gully Foyle's picture

At least the articles are cycling through the three most popular choices, Deflation/Inflation/Stagflation.

Unfortunately they are repititous and by now rather tedious.

Wake me when the world ends cause this shit is putting me to sleep.

YAWN

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 02:43 | 539514 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

People still keep hoping that inflation will wipe out their debt.

And every time I hear this, I remember some articles I read about the inflation forecast that will never happen. People will become debt slaves.

People dream of hyperinflation, but don't realize what that would mean.

It's like little children hopping for a war so they can play soldier. And if you've been in a conflict situation as some here will have been, you know you don't want to be in a domestic war.

Same for hyperinflation. That period is the forgotten period in Germany. Misery, death, hunger... you won't see funny and rozy movies about that period, don't you ever wonder why that is?

If you're in debt before the hyperinflation, you'll have NOTHING when it happens. People why have something, will be able to buy ALL the remainders of what's left!

In Germany, people who transferred all their money away, bought up EVERYTHING when hyperinflation kicked in. What was worth a million the day before was traded for a chicken.

And the smartest people, who transferred their money to France and Switzerland in the prewar period happened to be... mostly Jews.

And that was the reason Germans where so mad about them. They took their houses for peanuts, they fucked their wives for a sandwich.

If you don't have a reserve now, and hyperinflation kicks in: YOU ARE IN TROUBLE!

 

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 12:35 | 540561 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

"the inflation forecast that will never happen."

<three inches down, ON THE SAME POST>

"If you don't have a reserve now, and hyperinflation kicks in: YOU ARE IN TROUBLE."

 

I think I just got whiplash from your post.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 11:17 | 540299 Holden Caulfield
Holden Caulfield's picture

The deck is stacked against us. I don't put it past them to confiscate our gold and silver in the near future. We are in trouble in three areas, (energy, economy and the environment), any one of which can cause serious problems all three can send us back to the dark ages. Ideological subversion is alive and well in our government as well as in Wall Street. Most people nowadays are told black is white and believe it. How else can you explain how the majority of people believe the government’s explanation of the collapse of WTC building 7 being caused by an ordinary fire, when concrete is turned to dust, steel to molten metal, and the building coming down at free fall speed. Weapons of mass destruction, the illegal alien mess, and the Federal Reserve are just more of the same. Do you think do you think The Zeitgeist Movement and the Venus Project offer a viable solution?

Tue, 04/26/2011 - 13:29 | 1208269 william.smith61
william.smith61's picture

SWR, I followed your comments over at KD's site and found I usually agreed with you. That was a prescient article especially for it's time. 2 trillion stands on the Fed's balance sheet currently, add another $4 trillion and we do in fact arrive at $6 trillion. But that is most likely a low estimate, they will in fact be forced to further devalue the dollar, probably until it just snaps one day in a crisis of confidence. Again, you have stated this over and over in KD's site. Kudos. ABS Control Module

Tue, 04/26/2011 - 13:27 | 1208273 william.smith61
william.smith61's picture

SWR, I followed your comments over at KD's site and found I usually agreed with you. That was a prescient article especially for it's time. 2 trillion stands on the Fed's balance sheet currently, add another $4 trillion and we do in fact arrive at $6 trillion. But that is most likely a low estimate, they will in fact be forced to further devalue the dollar, probably until it just snaps one day in a crisis of confidence. Again, you have stated this over and over in KD's site. Kudos. ABS Control Module

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:02 | 537646 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

Tyler, what is the difference between the price of goods inflation and inflation of the currency.

At first I thought they where the same, but they aren't.

Goods are already rising in price. And still the currency is deflating.

I know it's because other currencies don't want the $ to inflate first and therefore they also deflate.

But this was the same in the fist depression.

I just wonder where the tipping point is and which products still tell the true values.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:19 | 537692 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

You have it backwards.

when the Euro went from 1.5 to 1.2, it was inflating, not deflating.

Bernanke printed money in late 08 to temporarly stop hyperinflation because if the economy crashed that bad, there would be no tax revenue to service the treaury market. Treasury selloff=dollar selloff=hyperinflation.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 12:53 | 537770 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

Oh, I see.  They printed a bunch of money to STOP hyperinflation, but printing money will cause hyperinflation too.

No matter what happens in your view, we will have hyperinflation.

Nevermind that the money supply does not equal prices and that more money is needed just to keep prices steady.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:15 | 537845 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Reread those definitions Johnny Bravo. Hyperinflation is not an inflation on steroids. It is a loss of faith in the currency and a dumping of that currency for anything else solid. Printing money could be a strategy in the short term to restore faith. Printing money could also result in spooking folks. Context. 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:39 | 537917 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

You are asking Bravo to apply critical thinking and allow for context.  Good luck with that.  No matter what the topic, if it's not "green shoots", the Boy's a little too eager to go off.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLnWf1sQkjY

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:58 | 537989 merehuman
merehuman's picture

Lol

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:21 | 538961 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

ok, you win‡

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 15:11 | 538258 optimator
optimator's picture

It's a state of mind that gives hyperinflation its velocity.  Assume you knew the price of new cars was going to be double in six months and your car was a few years old?

You'd get the new car, but the showroom would be crowded, you'd have to wait in line, and the dealer wouldn't be open to much negotiation.  But, you'd get that car.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:15 | 538815 Dr. Sandi
Dr. Sandi's picture

It's a state of mind that gives hyperinflation its velocity.  Assume you knew the price of new cars was going to be double in six months and your car was a few years old?

You'd get the new car, but the showroom would be crowded, you'd have to wait in line, and the dealer wouldn't be open to much negotiation.  But, you'd get that car.

No, actually, I'd keep my old car and drive it another year or three. Waiting in line to buy a hyperinflated car when I already have one that works fine is the ultimate dumbass move.

And this is part of why we have some extra silver rounds in the bunker instead of a pile of credit card invoices. Honda bitchez!

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 20:25 | 539085 Thomas
Thomas's picture

Think beanie babies: They stopped making them. Did they retain their value (price)?

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 09:35 | 539920 ATG
ATG's picture

No. Beanie Babies fads were more counterfeited and volatile in price than the dollar.

Beanie Babies made $6 B for Ty Warner and a whole lot less for most buyers...

http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/beanies.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beanie_Baby

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 15:26 | 538311 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

I would have replied sooner, but it seems that posting like five times blocks my account or something.  How annoying.

At least you have something to say, unlike the people underneath you, MsCreant.

Changing the definition of an event does not change the event.  That's all that I'll say about the definitions.

So how does this person suppose that the world's reserve currency will no longer be used or be worth anything?
There will be war long before that happens.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 16:10 | 538450 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

Nobody blocks your account, Troll. Now go change your pants.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLnWf1sQkjY

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:01 | 538768 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

Bullshit they don't.

Why don't you contribute something relevant, instead of being a lame ass bitch posting the same link over and over?

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:04 | 538780 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

See, I think people have asked you the same question for a long time.  Now I'm just fucking with you because I'm easily amused. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLnWf1sQkjY

 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:32 | 538858 tmosley
tmosley's picture

You've reached the last boss of Zerohedge, JB, and you've won!  Now, it's time to put Childish things away, and go do something productive.  Go talk to the neighbors about the weather.  Go join a charitable organization.  Go plant a tree.  Whatever you want, just GO.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 23:31 | 539358 Frank Owen
Frank Owen's picture

He needs to go find the bunny-boiler who lives in his state, start off with a blowie, get married and spend the rest of his life trying to grow grapes and teach their children how to read.

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 10:33 | 540125 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

what's a blowie mean, frank?

if i can suck, i could make a buck?

never thought about that line of work.

Wed, 08/25/2010 - 14:45 | 541451 kathy.chamberli...
kathy.chamberlin@gmail.com's picture

anyone, what is a blowie?

no answer use your imagination, kathy ok i am going to start using it.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:47 | 538894 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Um, JB, the "reserve currency" has no intrinsic value.

All it has presently is our stranglehold on the House of Saud and our occupation of the ME.  Neither of these is immutable.

Perhaps we will see a roman-esque multicentury decline, but that's anybody's guess.  But the fact that the FRN is reserve is meaningless.  It has no value beyond confidence in it and our military extortion racket.

As WW2 proved, nations can rise from poverty to world military power in relatively short timeframes.  A few better strategic concessions here or there and the Axis powers could have easily avoided destruction.

ALL paper currencies go to zero; this is an axiom.  The Pound Sterling...you know why it's called that, right?  It's what it originally was.  READ it.  Now tell me how much sterling a GBP fetches today.  It went from reserve to not, has survived the death of the Empire, depressions, bubbles' bursting, etc., sure it's still worth something, but it ain't buying you no pound of sterling anymore.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:09 | 538796 giddy
giddy's picture

Wow... am girl-crushing you... women that understand monetary policy are totally hot!

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:29 | 537881 hugolp
hugolp's picture

Why do you want to keep prices steady?

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:55 | 537977 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Yes this is an indebted fiat regime and every indebted fiat regime ends in hyperiflation.

If the bailout didn't happen, would you hold on to treasuries that you knew would be defaulted on, or would you sell them ?

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:12 | 538027 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

If the bailout didn't happen, would you hold on to treasuries that you knew would be defaulted on, or would you sell them ?

Is there a third choice? Pretty please with a cherry on top?

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 09:42 | 539933 ATG
ATG's picture

The US had serious inflations, including the Continental of the Revolutionary War, the Greenbacks of the Civil War and Carter/Nixon's Iran/Price and Wage Controls. None ended the regime in hyperinflation, although a lot of true believers in gold lost a lot of money.

Gold in fact went down in dollars from 1980 to 1999....

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:00 | 537988 taraxias
taraxias's picture

You've been so right time and again on this forum, posters better stand up and take notice <sarcasm off>

 

 

by Johnny Bravo  on Thu, 07/01/2010 - 15:47 #447313

It still is.  Look at the big rising wedge in the charts above.  It took that long for the wedge to play out.

It's still going down to at least the 900s based on the wedge you see above.  I don't have a timeline, but that's the technical pattern's resolution.

Also, note that my call was right at the time.  Thanks for proving how right I was.


 

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 15:24 | 538304 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

I've called pretty much every directional action in the price.  (I even called this new bull ru in it, but it went higher than I said it would.  It hit the 61.8 fib instead of the 50 fib)  If you can't understand the difference between short term and long term, what else is there to say?

I like how you only show up to repost my old posts (that will be proven right) or to bash the Jews (as is the case on Mish's board).

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 18:15 | 538814 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

You're a hoot.  At least your repetitive posts have some socially redeeming value -- unlike Johnny's.

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:59 | 539021 Bendromeda Strain
Bendromeda Strain's picture

Yeah Bates, you hit that Liberace retrace right on the money...

Tue, 08/24/2010 - 01:07 | 539444 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

"or to bash the Jews (as is the case on Mish's board)." 

 

Taraxias is a Jew basher?  Those are some harsh words...

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 13:58 | 537990 ATG
ATG's picture

CPI was 18% in 1980, 13% in 2008, and 8% now, a disinflationary downtrend.

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts

When banks eventually write off bad mortgages and go broke, stiffing depositors, with further collapsing tax reveues and insolvent FDIC, GSEs, OPIC, PBGC, SIPC as well as the Social Security Trust, that will be deflation with a capital D, as in Depression, when few may be able to afford a chicken, let alone an egg.

The wealthy may have some chicken coops like Frank Perdue. The rest may be free range gleaning homesteaders.

Welcome back to the Wild West Days, when Brinks and Wells Fargo moved gold coin payrolls by ship, stage or rail and were robbed or sunk...

Mon, 08/23/2010 - 15:03 | 538202 GoinFawr
GoinFawr's picture

Heh, congratz on your taste in sites

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/6199

Regards

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!