• rc whalen
    02/09/2010 - 08:06
    At our firm we frequently receive calls from clients and readers asking about the likelihood of the passage by the Congress in Washington of reform legislation regarding over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, financial regulation and/or mortgage securitization. Our answer is small to none given the political trends and the state of the lobbies in Washington, most specifically the large bank lobby that protects the Sell Side monopoly in OTC derivatives and securities. The fact that Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) is still apparently not comfortable with the entirely watered down House proposal to reform OTC derivatives, for example, tells you all you need to know. Stick a fork in it.
  • Leo Kolivakis
    02/09/2010 - 08:44
    Greece just implemented pension reforms in an attempt to shore up its public finances and others will follow suit...
  • smartknowledgeu
    02/09/2010 - 02:23
    Today, casinos have much more integrity in their business dealings than do banks. In general, casinos have more cash and more transparent business dealings with their clients than do banks. That's why it's so ironic that most large commercial banks, as part of their "moral code", do not allow private bankers to do business with casinos. It appears today, that the bankers got that one entirely wrong.

Guest Post: I Sold Short My Neighbor's House

Tyler Durden's picture




Submitted by Damien Hoffman of Wall St. Cheat Sheet

This evening I was sipping on some California wine when I had the most American of entrepreneurial ideas (to get rich): short sell my neighbor’s house.

That modern cave has been on the market for several months and we’re about to head into the seasonal slow period. I’ve seen some glossy graphs and charts in the local paper showing prices should dip at least 5% in the winter.

I quickly walked outside to get the real estate agent’s number off the For Sale sign. I’ve passed it a trillion times, but I have a neurological-type popup blocker protecting me from anything with Glamor Shots and a sales pitch.

After some extremely brief haggling (i.e., the agent asked for a high price, and I said, “No.” The agent came down 10%, and I said, “No.” Etc.), we arrived at what I considered a great deal. As a sweetener, I even told her to forgo any improvements or an inspection. I am short-selling this house …

So, to make a short story shorter, the agent created a legal agreement with me by which I borrowed the house to sell now, I could buy it back for less in the winter, and then return it to the current “owners” (such a frail term).

Sure, there were issues about who would occupy the house and when, what if I can’t buy back the house later, am I artificially driving down the market if I am selling something I do not “own”, etc. But the agent and I consider those pesky deal-breakers only lawyers would get neurotic about. Besides, if this financial scheme works with stocks, why not houses? This is America. It’s a free country.

So, if you are up this way sometime between Christmas and late February, give me a call. I have a risk-free investment you might be interested in seeing …

4.5
Your rating: None Average: 4.5 (2 votes)



by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 15:45
#101275

This doesn't really work for non-fungible assets. There is no "market" in the house, it's very illiquid. No real comparable transactions that occur with any regularity (assuming the other neighbors are also not selling their houses). The price is set by a single bid.

So later in the year, when it comes time for you to "buy" the house back, you can sufficiently lowball to ensure an excellent return.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 21:19
#101616

This is timely, because I'm pretty sure he was serious.

by koaj
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 15:55
#101289

even better...take out an insurance policy on the house then burn it down

by bonddude
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 17:28
#101393

Naked short ??? teehee

by bugs_
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 15:57
#101294

There was a case several years ago of a scammer

who put up other peoples' empty, undeveloped land

as colateral for loans.  He only got caught when two

banksters were talking to each other about recent

customers and realized they had both done business

with the same scammer.  I read that he had obtained

roughly 1.7 million in loans before getting caught.

A similar idea!

by ozziindaus
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 16:06
#101300

Here's a better idea. Buy the house for a steal and orginize for a deadbeat buddy to buy it off you, at an over inflated price of course, and then have that buddy default with 12-18 months free rent to look forward to. So what's a FICA score worth anyway, eh? Win-win

by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 16:26
#101325

Straw man purchases are also illegal...

by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 16:29
#101330

Goldman already did it.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 16:52
#101353

Why not go out and get a FHA loan for 3% down and if the house price goes up then you you make money; if it goes down on the otherhand, then walk (after squatting for 24 months free of charge, of course). Not a bad investment... actually it's a tax-payer financed, risk free put.

by Emmanuel Goldstein
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 18:53
#101484

Why stop at houses?

My neighbor has a SUV that's been sitting in his front yard for sale for the last 7 months...

by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 19:11
#101498

The bank still has a lien on the property - foreclosure risk

by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 21:06
#101601

.

Excellent analogy for the casino that our financial system has become!!!!

.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 21:19
#101615

Great satire. :^)
"Think naughty. Act nice."

by Anonymous
on Sat, 10/17/2009 - 03:08
#101860

Title should be "I'd LIKE to short my neighbors house, and have obtained borrow in order to do so".

Good luck getting someone to lift your offer.

by Anonymous
on Sat, 10/17/2009 - 11:37
#102045

Is that you Bernie?

by Anonymous
on Sat, 10/17/2009 - 11:39
#102048

Is that you Bernie?

by Anonymous
on Sat, 10/17/2009 - 14:05
#102130

Why didn't you just buy a CDS on the house, er, I mean fire insurance?

We could end this depression quickly if everybody bought fire insurance on their neighbor's houses [The way the Banks bought "insurance" on mortgage backed securities they didn't own...]

After all if you bought fire insurance on all your neighbors houses - the local Fire Department would have full employment, they'd be adding "shifts," and the local builders wouldn't be able to keep up with the demand. ....just think of the economic stimulus.... new refrigerators, ranges, carpet, tile, linens, cloths, TVs.... virtually every sector of the economy would be thriving!

by torabora
on Sat, 10/17/2009 - 15:02
#102180

WTH happened to PMI???? Isn't PMI supposed to pay off defaulted loans and become the owners? Why is there a problem? People STILL pay PMI...is somebody taking PMI and scurrying off with the loot?

by Anonymous
on Mon, 10/19/2009 - 15:36
#103733

PMI only covers a small portion of the loan. The portion that has the highest likelyhood to not be repaid once the house is liquidated.

Think the last 20%...

Anyway, the private mortgage insurers are in deep with all these defaults. Check out the FHA and their losses with 7% of loans in default

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This problem is intended to determine if you are a machine- or not sufficiently intelligent (or determined) to participate at Zero Hedge.
28 times equals 112
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".