This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: The "Other" Real-Estate Issue Revisited

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by Contrary Investor

The “Other” Real Estate Issue - Revisited…

It was in early February of this year that we penned a discussion about the state of the commercial real estate markets.  Of course at the time the Street’s eyes were collectively glued on the near free fall in residential real estate values and general activity.  Our suggestion at the time was that CRE (commercial real estate) was about to make a very prominent guest appearance on the economic stage as being yet another meaningful real estate related issue for the financial sector, the economy, and for those holding significant investment positions in the asset class such as institutional pension funds.  You know what has happened since, but the reality is that CRE will continue to be a problem child issue for some time to come.  As we’ll see in just a minute, relative to prior historical CRE reconciliatory cycles, we’re just getting started.  Will this be yet another “challenge” for the banks ahead?  You bet.  But the miracle of the eraser the government allowed the banks to invoke sidestepping mark-to-market activity may delay the true realization of asset value declines.  As you’d guess, we have a lot of charts that together tell quite the story of deflation in values and activity, both now and we expect also yet to come in the current cycle.  And why is this issue important to really the broader US economy as we look ahead?  Simple - its implications for bank lending and normalized functioning of credit markets ex the massive baling wire and duct tape support of the financial sector the Fed/Treasury/Administration (none of which has been removed as of yet, or can be if asset values such as CRE continue to deteriorate) has engineered.  We believe the CRE issue will forestall a return to credit flows from the banks as they privately (no mark-to-market) continue to nurse balance sheet wounds for some time to come.  Let’s get started.

We want to kick off this analysis with some data we have never shown you before.  But it is certainly very timely right now.  Why?  Because this data is both current and market value based.  We’re NEVER going to see this type of data coming from the banks as they will lie as long as they can about CRE values on their books.  They have the blessing of the government, so don’t hold your breath in terms of trying to find truth coming from the financial sector.  Alternatively, and very importantly, the institutional investment community still marks their real estate assets to market each quarter in terms of keeping integrity in calculating ongoing total rates of return for their funds.  Thank God someone is willing to tell the truth, right?  It seems there’s less and less of it around each day.

The National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF) is an association of institutional real estate professionals who share a common interest in their industry.  They are investment managers, plan sponsors, academicians, consultants, appraisers, CPA's and other service providers who have a significant involvement in pension fund real estate investments. They come together to address vital industry issues and to promote research.  The NCREIF was established to serve the institutional real estate investment community as a non-partisan collector, processor, validator and disseminator of real estate performance information.  Now you know what we are talking about in terms of integrity of the data.  No tier I, II and III assets for these folks to manipulate and massage in terms of values, just honest third party actual quarterly appraisals of real properties.  The NCREIF publishes a National Property Index (NPI) on a quarterly basis that gives us some very good insight into what is happening quarter by quarter with the value of institutionally held commercial real estate investments.  And you can be darn sure they are much closer to the truth of what is happening with CRE values than the banks in this country will ever let on.  The NPI covers all “classes” of institutional investment in CRE including, office, retail, hotel, industrial and apartment properties.

The NCREIF Property Index is a quarterly time series composite total rate of return measure of investment performance of a very large pool of individual commercial real estate properties acquired in the private market for investment purposes only. All properties in the NPI have been acquired, at least in part, on behalf of tax-exempt institutional investors - the great majority being pension funds. As such, all properties are held in a fiduciary environment.  NCREIF requires that properties included in the NPI be valued at least quarterly, either internally or externally, using standard commercial real estate appraisal methodology.  Each property must be independently appraised a minimum of once every three years.  Because the NPI is a measure of private market real estate performance, the capital value component of return is predominately the product of property appraisals.  As such, the NPI is often referred to as an "appraisal based index."  At the moment there are roughly 6000 individual properties in the index whose value approaches $300 billion.  Sorry for the knock down drag out description as to who these folks are and how the index is calculated, but we believe it is one of the most “transparent” pieces of data regarding ongoing CRE values we can find.  Of course it seems the government alternatively believes that by wiping away mark to market we can just go back to lying to ourselves and everything will be just fine.  That worked out really well in the prior cycle, no?  In terms of honesty and integrity, we’ll take the NCREIF data any day of the week, thank you.

Finally to the point, below is the three decade-plus history of quarterly returns for the NCREIF property index.  Get the picture as to current trends? 

Of course you do.  We’re currently looking at the most significant period of consecutive quarterly drops in value in what admittedly is the short history of the data (going back to 1978).  Although we do not detail the quantitative numbers in the chart, over the last four quarters (3Q 2008-2Q 2009) the index has recorded a 22.5% contraction in value.  And just what does this infer about bank holdings of CRE loan paper?  Thanks to the current Administration’s financial sector “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for bank assets, we’re not going to really know any time soon.  Good thing the US banks can simply move forward reporting record earnings and ignore the current inconvenient truth of declining CRE values, no?  We only see some glimpse of the truth in asset values every Friday when we see that week's US bank failures.  Did you catch how BB&T wrote down Colonial Bank asset values by 37% after Colonial's essential failure and melding into BB&T?  The write down never happened until Colonial hit the tarmac nose first, yet asset values had vaporized long ago.  And this is the "transparency" we've been promised?

In the next chart we’ve taken CRE individual asset class quarterly returns from the NCREIF data and produced a compound rate of return series for each asset class since the beginning of the current decade.  Please be aware that the NCREIF rate of return data includes two components - an income return and capital price change.  Although we will not drag you through the specific quantitative data mud, you’ll just have to trust us in telling you that income returns have been positive each and every year.  That means the capital return (price change) both primarily drives the direction of the data in the chart below plus is a bit worse than the actual numbers in the chart show due to the positive influence of the income flows.

In short, we are looking at some very substantial price declines to produce these compound annual rate of return trends for each property type.  In the table below we delineate the NCREIF pure prior four quarter rate of return by property type for the period ending 2Q 2009. Again, it is the true reality of actual property price appraisals that is driving these numbers.  C'mon, can't we allow the pension funds to simply make up "fair value" numbers like the banks do?  It just doesn't seem fair they should have to take these types of asset value hits, right?  They can't convert to bank holding companies, can they?

Certainly the numbers you see above are breathtaking, especially given that they only cover the prior four quarters through 2Q of this year.  And to be totally honest, value declines in the third quarter of last year for all property types were less than 1%.  Meaning that 95% of the price damage you see in the table above has occurred since September month end of last year to the present.  Just how meaningful is this historically?  How does the present CRE down cycle compare to historical cycles?  We only wish we had the very long term data.  But what we do have is a copy of a presentation done by Ken Riggs, President and CEO of Real Estate Research Corp. (RERC) given at the summer 2009 conference of the very same NCREIF.  RERC bills themselves as “one of the first, and one of the most recognized, independent  and objective commercial real estate research, valuation and consulting firms in the nation. For more than 75 years, RERC real estate research, publications, market studies, property valuations, investment criteria and trends analysis have proven visionary”.  Anyway, the following is some data Mr. Riggs presented to the NCREIF crowd literally seven weeks ago in terms of prior CRE cycle character.

As you can see, his numbers for current magnitude of decline are not too far off what the NCREIF property index tells us.  As we look at the data above, what is most striking is that it has only now taken really three quarters in the current cycle to produce 41% of the decline seen in the 24 quarter down cycle of the early 1990’s.  And of course the early 1990’s CRE collapse was in good part driven by the vaporization of the S&L industry.  Seven quarters of CRE decline early this decade produced a “rounding error” of price decline magnitude relative to the present cycle.  And unfortunately, as we see it, we’re still in the first few innings of the current CRE cycle reconciliation game for now.  And as far as the banks and their CRE assets are concerned, the national anthem has not yet even been played.  We’ll just have to see how it all unfolds from here.

Final chart from the good folks at the NCREIF.  As is often the case in any asset class where a very meaningful decline in values takes place over a very short period of time, activity simply dries up.  You may remember our personal near and dear mantra courtesy of Ray DeVoe - “Liquidity is a coward.  There’s always too much when it’s needed the least and it’s never around when it’s needed the most.”  Please be aware that the 2009 number in the chart below has indeed been annualized.  Quite the collapse in activity, right?  In no way will this help "price", quite the opposite.

It’s a shame all the buyers have vanished, because as you may remember close to $300 billion-plus of CRE mortgage loans are up for renewal or reset this year.  And as of now the asset backed market for commercial real estate loans is contracting as opposed to expanding.  Much like the residential asset backed markets, the commercial asset backed markets are no longer open 24/7.

That really leaves the banks as the potential saviors for commercial real estate finance.  But here unfortunately again, the banks are nursing their CRE wounds in the privacy and blackness of their non-mark to market balance sheets.  What we do know is that per the most recent bank loan officers survey, over 65% of banks were still tightening standards for commercial real estate loans when these folks last answered the phone (a quarterly survey).

So just where does that leave CRE owners who need to refinance this year or early next?  In trouble, that’s where.  And if this were not enough, we can tell you from first hand knowledge that bank regulators have been crisscrossing the country examining bank CRE loans intently.  They do not want another mortgage debacle as was residential real estate on their current watch.  Like they have a choice, right?  In many cases current CRE appraisals are being conducted against existing bank property loans and capital calls are going out to CRE owners who have always been model credits and have never missed a payment in their lives.  And CRE values will improve in this type of a regulatory and available capital environment?  Quite the opposite, as you already know. 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 09/01/2009 - 10:31 | 54951 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Moin from Germany,

from London via FT

Nomura Gets 6 Years Free Rent For London HQ -

Japanese investment bank Nomura has secured a rental deal on its new London headquarters allowing free rent for almost six years, the Financial Times reported, citing the terms of a deal to be announced on Tuesday.

The FT said the bank will confirm plans to move its UK business, including the staff taken on as part of the Lehman Brothers acquisition, into a new office development on the Thames.

Up to 4,000 banking staff will move into the 12-storey Watermark Place next year, many relocating from the former Lehman Brothers building in Canary Wharf.

The landlord, Oxford Properties, is the property arm of an Ontario pension fund and UBS

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:00 | 54974 zeropointfield (not verified)
zeropointfield's picture

That wouldn't be the same pension fund that buys a stake in Skype?

The group buying Skype also includes London-based Index Ventures and the Canada Pension Plan, in addition to Silver Lake and Andreessen's firm Andreessen Horowitz.

Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE58016S20090901

 

Wed, 09/02/2009 - 00:25 | 55853 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The Ontario Pension Fund mentioned is a provincial provincial teacher's pension fund.

The Canada Pension Plan is the equivalent of Social Security in the US.

so no, they aren't the same pension funds.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:14 | 54987 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

So does The Law require corporations to maximize profits to their stockholders, but not require pension funds to protect the savings of the workers whose pensions the funds are managing? If so, then The Law appears to be purposed at stealing from the poor to give to the rich.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 14:46 | 55063 sigmadelta (not verified)
sigmadelta's picture

This was clear to me when reading the Economist's interpretation of the annualized growth rates in Asia a couple of weeks ago.

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 10:37 | 54956 crzyhun
crzyhun's picture

Grim....

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 10:42 | 54961 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The real damage occurs when tenancy drops below 85%. Equity, evaporates, cash flow dwindles and landlords can't even afford to pay the property tax and insurance.

This should happen mid-2011.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 12:09 | 55069 Strom
Strom's picture

Not sure where you got that occupancy number, but plenty of properties operate at 85% or less occupancy and cash flow just fine (even after debt service).

Granted, there are many owners who overleveraged from 2003-2007, but there's no hard and fast rule on occupancy as compared to cash flow.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 10:52 | 54966 Assetman
Assetman's picture

And if this were not enough, we can tell you from first hand knowledge that bank regulators have been crisscrossing the country examining bank CRE loans intently.  They do not want another mortgage debacle as was residential real estate on their current watch.  Like they have a choice, right?  In many cases current CRE appraisals are being conducted against existing bank property loans and capital calls are going out to CRE owners who have always been model credits and have never missed a payment in their lives. 

That's a primary reason why you are seeing so many banks on the FDIC Problem List.  A lot of these are smaller Federally chartered community banks that have to get their CRE portfolios in shape in a hurry.

Ironically-- because entities like the OCC are being so proavctive in pushing for new CRE appraisals-- many of these banks are having to provision for loan losses very conservatively and are pressed have reserve ratios in the 12% to 14% range.  Those that can't get there will likely be in deep kimchi.

And yeah, we've seen some "capital calls" on CRE owners with not only good payment histories-- but with sizable trust (investment) accounts.  After telling a customer his loan is not good enough, it's nearly impossible to keep any other earning asset.

Just as ironic, is that it's likely that many of these smaller community banks are in much better shape than their larger brethern.  Why?  Because the government has (1) been more proactive on CRE risks and forcing the issue on reducing CRE portfolio exposures and provisioning for losses; and (2) they are simply not going to bailout smaller banks.

What gets overlooked are all the STATE chartered banks that should make the FDIC Problem List but don't-- due mainly to many state regulators being way behind the 8-ball on tracking CRE portfolio risk (though a handful of state regulators are doing okay). 

It's these banks that are likely to make the headlines, in a not so good way. 

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 10:58 | 54970 bbbilly1326
bbbilly1326's picture

Wow, this is a dynamite presentation of data that not many people apparently have thought to look at.

 

Great job, as usual, turning over rocks and pointing out nasty creatures thereunder..........

And even I could understand it, with the pains you've taken to explain.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:05 | 54975 KeyserSöze
KeyserSöze's picture

Look for the Accounting cheating to continue UNEBATED well into next year 2010.  I suspect the real value will NEVER be realized as the Fed will put these garbage securities onto its books via the tax payer printing machine.  That is of course if they can't get the perma bull REIT buck shops to continue to issue more equity to dumb institutional money who believe Goldman's call about "the recession is over".

Tyler put the link up in "Frontrunning today" but several things in there are worth pointing out:

(read the full article for the Japan esk spin to the accounting 'change'-yep there is that F**king word again)

 

From the article:

"In such cases, fair value can be determined only through "unobservable inputs" — information that reflects a company's own ideas about the assumptions market participants would use in their valuations of the asset or liability. "

FASB also cleared it with Wall Street before ANY change is made. 

"FASB did a field test with more than half a dozen financial-statement preparers, most in the financial-services sector."

Conclusion: More upgrades to come from our BFF bank prop desks  to help finance the second biggest ponzi scheme besides the US Federal Debt.

http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14346038

Wed, 09/02/2009 - 02:00 | 55883 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

You guys DO NOT understand the FED. The FED will take these loans good bad or ugly, let the bank fee and pump them at usury rates till the loans get blown to massive make believe losses. Stick them on the national debt balance sheet and pretend that american people owe the money. They made the president pay to rebuild germany during the great depression while americans starved because they wanted germany flushed with cash to build a war machine society.

You just don't get it. Someones $500 credit card that got blown up to a $2500 loss through usuary and fees and then finally allowed to default is going to become national debt. The FED never forgives debt no matter how silly convoluted or scammed those debts were built.

WHY DO YOU THINK THEY WON"T LOAN CREDIT WORTHY PEOPLE MONEY? Because they only want fake debts that have to default to move it to national balance sheets and pretend it's national debt.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:04 | 54977 Ruth
Ruth's picture

Besides, aren't all the cre lo's on a private beach right now vacationing? 

 

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:04 | 54978 ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

Why do I fear a TALF II...

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:25 | 54995 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Wait you're saying there have been 600 billion in new CMBS issuance in 2009? I don't know where you got that number because it's plain wrong.

-- see PDF page 5
http://www.cmsaglobal.org/uploadedFiles/CMSA_Site_Home/Industry_Resource...

And man he really pounds you in the face with his disdain for accounting rules.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:26 | 54999 Anonymous
Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:51 | 55032 ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

This isn't a pretty picture here... and it doesn't look like it's going to get better anytime soon.

Great report... thanks for the link!

 

 

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:41 | 55015 Mos
Mos's picture

Enter the Federal Reserve, buyer of all garbage CRE related.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:49 | 55030 Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

Close, but that's a bit off yet.  First the T has to take the losses.  In no small way.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 11:53 | 55034 They steal from...
They steal from us everyday's picture

Nothing to see here!!!!!

 

Move along!!!!!

 

Green shoots, green shoots, green shoots, green shoots, green shoots...

 

Come on everybody say it together.....

 

GREEN SHOOTS GREEN SHOOTS GREEN SHOOTS!!!!

 

I CAN"T HEAR YOU!!!!  LOUDER NOW!!!

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 13:50 | 55198 ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

... green shoot me now!

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 14:46 | 55055 sigmadelta (not verified)
sigmadelta's picture

wow look at stocks crash

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 12:13 | 55074 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Haha, I hope my ex-landlord takes it in the ass on his properties.

I'm trying to find information on the CRE exposure of First Republic Bank (previously acquired by Merrill Lynch in 2007, now a wholly owned bitch of Bank of America).  Since the buyout by ML in 2007 they no longer publish their financials publicly.  Is there some other way to get at this data?

I am Chumbawamba, and I am grateful in advance for a clue.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 16:31 | 55414 pros
pros's picture

The NCREIF numbers are submitted by the owners of the properties on a "blind basis" they are always stale

 

The MIT transactions based index is a little better than NCREIF and tells a much worse story-the below MIT link compares the two:

http://web.mit.edu/cre/research/credl/tbi.html

Lots of Luck

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 18:58 | 55581 ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

Mucho gracias amigo...

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 17:17 | 55471 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I wonder if using a warehouse as a parking lot diminishes its value?

http://merrillovermatter.blogspot.com/search/label/cre

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 18:43 | 55563 ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

That's nothing... how about a theatre?

http://detroityes.com/downtown/38michtheat_pan.htm

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 18:48 | 55566 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Damn, got me beat on that one.

Tue, 09/01/2009 - 21:47 | 55727 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

ejh

Wed, 09/09/2009 - 07:57 | 63298 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Thanks to everyone. This information is really helpful.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 23:16 | 201761 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

You should make a video about all of this and post it everywhere.

http://www.americanvideoproductions.net/

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!