• Tim Knight from...
    04/28/2016 - 00:27
    I was expecting a few boring candidate statements of the U.S. Senate - AKA the World's Most Exclusive Club - but, boy, was I wrong. Just take a look at some of these gems.
  • Tim Knight from...
    04/28/2016 - 00:27
    I was expecting a few boring candidate statements of the U.S. Senate - AKA the World's Most Exclusive Club - but, boy, was I wrong. Just take a look at some of these gems.

Guest Post: Past Peak Oil - Why Time Is Now Short

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:13 | 1318692 ElvisDog
ElvisDog's picture

Methane is CH4, a simple molecule. Oil is a much more complex hydrocarbon chain.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:33 | 1318704 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:31 | 1318713 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

 

Some more reading for you the next time you pull your head out of his ass

http://www.livescience.com/9404-mysterious-origin-supply-oil.html

In the 1950's, however, a few Russian scientists began questioning this traditional view and proposed instead that petroleum could form naturally deep inside the Earth.

 

This so-called "abiogenic" petroleum might seep upward through cracks formed by asteroid impacts to form underground pools, according to one hypothesis. Some geologists have suggested probing ancient impact craters in the search for oil.

 

Abiogenic sources of oil have been found, but never in commercially profitable amounts. The controversy isn't over whether naturally forming oil reserves exist, said Larry Nation of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. It's over how much they contribute to Earth's overall reserves and how much time and effort geologists should devote to seeking them out.

 

If abiogenic petroleum sources are indeed found to be abundant, it would mean Earth contains vast reserves of untapped petroleum and, since other rocky objects formed from the same raw material as Earth, that crude oil might exist on other planets or moons in the solar system, scientists say.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:58 | 1318808 trav7777
trav7777's picture

WOW...srsly?

Do you HONESTLY suppose I don't know who Thomas Gold is or haven't heard the abiotic oil bullshit a million times by now?

Pull your fist out of your lover's ass and smack yourself upside the head with it and knock some sense into yourself.

It doesn't MATTER where oil comes from, dipshit.

What is the expected PRODUCTION RATE of methane from Titan?  About the same as your IQ

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:51 | 1318911 tmosley
tmosley's picture

 

Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

 

 

 

Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

 

link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

 

More eugenics bullshit:

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

#1024940

 

You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

 

The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

 

Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

 

Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

 

My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

 

NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

 

Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

 

For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

 

reply flag as junk (0) 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

#1024972

 

the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

 

So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

 

The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

 

Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

 

link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

 

___

 

Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

#839016

 

YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

 

WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

 

Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

 

They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

 

WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

 

The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

 

People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

 

 

 

 

 

Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

 

I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

 

99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

 

WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

 

Login or register to post comments

 

link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

 

___

 

More racism: 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

#1012036

 

huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

 

This is what we call a "hate fact."

 

Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

 

reply flag as junk (3) 

 

 

link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

 

___

 

So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

 

Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

 So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

 

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 10:56 | 1319210 HedgleeDooRight
HedgleeDooRight's picture

Sunny,

 

Did you ever hear of Stanely Miller?  And what was the earth's atmosphere like a few billion years ago?

 

Did you know that gasses are much less dense than liquids and solids?

 

Do not make great leaps of faith based on ignorance.

 

You need to start by discussing biology, physics and chemistry with your neighbor's 8th grader...

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:31 | 1318542 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

 

Some more reading for you the next time you pull your head out of his ass

http://www.livescience.com/9404-mysterious-origin-supply-oil.html

In the 1950's, however, a few Russian scientists began questioning this traditional view and proposed instead that petroleum could form naturally deep inside the Earth.

 

This so-called "abiogenic" petroleum might seep upward through cracks formed by asteroid impacts to form underground pools, according to one hypothesis. Some geologists have suggested probing ancient impact craters in the search for oil.

 

Abiogenic sources of oil have been found, but never in commercially profitable amounts. The controversy isn't over whether naturally forming oil reserves exist, said Larry Nation of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. It's over how much they contribute to Earth's overall reserves and how much time and effort geologists should devote to seeking them out.

 

If abiogenic petroleum sources are indeed found to be abundant, it would mean Earth contains vast reserves of untapped petroleum and, since other rocky objects formed from the same raw material as Earth, that crude oil might exist on other planets or moons in the solar system, scientists say.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 20:07 | 1318499 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

Oil does not exist in significant quantities anywhere other than where we've been drilling, for the somewhat obvious reason that if it were there, drilling would be there.

 

That is absolutely the stupidest comment ever made on ZH. Oil does not exist anywhere that we've been drilling. Therefore, nobody will ever discover a major oilfield again. I'm sure there were plenty of dumbasses saying the same thing in the 1940's before oil was discovered in Saudi Arabia. Vast new oilfields are found every decade. The Cantarell Field wasn't discovered until 1976 off the coast of Mexico. The Tupi Field off Brazil was just discovered a few years ago. They are just starting to drill in Central Asia and haven't even started yet in the Artic. The Orinco Belt in Venezuela has three times more oil than the Ghawar Field in Saudi Arabia. There is even more oil available in the Athabasca Fields. It all depends on the price of oil. 

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:34 | 1318897 trav7777
trav7777's picture

ah...Cantarell.  The 2nd highest producing field in the world, which crashed down to sub 500kbpd in the span of a few years.  As high as 33% YoY production declines.

Oh, but Peak Oil isn't real.  Because if wells peak, and fields peak, and nations peak, the collection of nations we call the "earth" won't.

Makes total sense.  LOL

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:16 | 1318939 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

 

 

 

Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

 

link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

 

More eugenics bullshit:

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

#1024940

 

You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

 

The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

 

Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

 

Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

 

My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

 

NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

 

Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

 

For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

 

reply flag as junk (0) 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

#1024972

 

the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

 

So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

 

The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

 

Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

 

link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

 

___

 

Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

#839016

 

YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

 

WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

 

Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

 

They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

 

WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

 

The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

 

People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

 

 

 

 

 

Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

 

I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

 

99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

 

WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

 

Login or register to post comments

 

link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

 

___

 

More racism: 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

#1012036

 

huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

 

This is what we call a "hate fact."

 

Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

 

reply flag as junk (3) 

 

 

link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

 

___

 

So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

 

Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

 So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:41 | 1318904 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

In the eightees we started consuming more than we found and produced. We have never looked back

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:13 | 1318937 Urban Redneck
Urban Redneck's picture

@CrashisOptimistic - this is a non-sequitur...

Oil does not exist in significant quantities anywhere other than where we've been drilling, for the somewhat obvious reason that if it were there, drilling would be there.

Why do boundary disputes exist?  Are you suggesting that that there are no significant quantities of oil in Nigeria's or Equitorial Guinea's disputed boundaries?  There are dozens of other contested boundaries that revolve around disputes over mineral rights access and ownership, as well as areas deemed "off-limits" for reasons that have nothing to do with the economics of oil.

 

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:01 | 1317941 Shell Game
Shell Game's picture

If you do a bit of research yourself, you'll find there is no 'dinosaurs=modern oil' theory.  What you will find is a strong argument for zooplankton as the carbon source for our modern oil.  Like the wind and rain can tear down mountains, the constant accumulation and biochemical transformation of plankton over eons made the black gold we use and fight over today.

Also, I wonder how much more domestic oil we would produce w/o the handcuffs?  ;-)  And remember too, our reserve currency status make foreign oil much cheaper than the cost to produce domestic oil.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 20:25 | 1318519 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

Whatever the origins of oil, we're finding huge deposits much deeper than what was previously thought possible. Nobody knows how much oil is down there that hasn't been found. 

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:35 | 1318899 trav7777
trav7777's picture

and while you're talking about these fields, you stupid homo, why don't you go and tell us what the PRODUCTION RATE will be from them, instead of what their reserves projections are?

Soon as you figure that one out, you will realize how stupid you are right now.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:00 | 1318922 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

Despite his homophobia trav is right. Our entire society and most of our economic principles are based on the presumption of ever expanding sources of.cheap crude. None of what you claim solves our problem that these easy sourcess are running dry fast

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:15 | 1318938 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

 

 

 

Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

 

link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

 

More eugenics bullshit:

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

#1024940

 

You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

 

The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

 

Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

 

Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

 

My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

 

NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

 

Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

 

For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

 

reply flag as junk (0) 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

#1024972

 

the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

 

So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

 

The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

 

Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

 

link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

 

___

 

Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

#839016

 

YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

 

WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

 

Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

 

They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

 

WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

 

The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

 

People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

 

 

 

 

 

Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

 

I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

 

99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

 

WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

 

Login or register to post comments

 

link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

 

___

 

More racism: 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

#1012036

 

huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

 

This is what we call a "hate fact."

 

Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

 

reply flag as junk (3) 

 

 

link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

 

___

 

So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

 

Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

 So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 20:54 | 1318567 D1eeeeeNAHHHHH
D1eeeeeNAHHHHH's picture

Good call.  Let's not forget prior to Lybia's war there was a much bigger geological find in oil there amounting to trillions of barrels!  Anyone heard of the Bakkan Ridge from South Dakota to southern Canada?  That adds nearly another trillion barrels.

 

The only thing that's peak about peak oil is peak bs in all of our lifetimes.  Why don't we hear about global warming anymore?  Because no one believes in the peak BS theories of a nonscientist Al Gore who owned and may still own a huge share of the carbon trading system we were to subscribe to until hackers blew the lying scientist out of the water by making their con game public by exposing their emails.  Where is Al Gore now?  Is he fighting the BP oil spill?  Is he lobbying and demanding the US and Japan to cement in all those blown nuclear reactors?  No, he's all about the money.  Until OPEC and other cartels controlling oil are broken, we won't have the oil at $25 a barrel where it makes oil companies a small profit due to competition.

 

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 04:25 | 1319001 Seer
Seer's picture

"As a long time believer in Peak Oil, I can tell you that it has been next year since about 2005."

And people diagnosed with cancer weren't previously diagnosed with it.

Logic, fail!

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 20:01 | 1318492 G-R-U-N-T
G-R-U-N-T's picture

Good lord...Not this "Peak Oil" crap again!

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:09 | 1317287 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

EROEI anyone? 

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:21 | 1317331 Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

NATURAL LAW

update:

I just heard that the planet Pluto is hollow and full of Light Sweet Crude. If we run out here (HA!) we can always build space tankers and get it from there.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:43 | 1317459 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Let's get on it!  That makes me think...didn't George Herbert Walker Bush promise me we would be living on the moon and Mars by now?

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:27 | 1317542 That Peak Oil Guy
That Peak Oil Guy's picture

Anyone else here think that perhaps the timing of the EIA ending their energy analysis is just a bit suspicious? And if they stop doing this, how will they do their jobs?  Isn't this vital baseline data for making strategic decisions?

Looks like pressure has been applied to keep the Ponzi going that much longer.  The fact that they are ending it rather than fudging makes me think the game is just about up...

TPOG

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:32 | 1317705 trav7777
trav7777's picture

EIA is full of shit.  IEA's data doesn't jibe and neither do other production figures which show no magical new record high in C&C.

EIA is USG

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:00 | 1317999 That Peak Oil Guy
That Peak Oil Guy's picture

Yeah, I know.  But now they are completely giving up the disinformation campaign?  Seems odd.

TPOG

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:50 | 1318913 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

Odd but predictable. Just shows you who's in charge

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:28 | 1317669 DosZap
DosZap's picture

Spastica,

Silly rabbit, don't you know Pluto is no longer a planet.

It's been reclassified, it's an Asteroid.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:15 | 1318045 Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

That's what the Peakers want you to believe; it makes it seem like there is less oil available if it's only an asteroid.

Mon, 05/30/2011 - 05:41 | 1322061 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

It's a kuper belt object.

Mon, 05/30/2011 - 09:49 | 1322265 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Quibble.... Kuiper

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:42 | 1318233 Nels
Nels's picture

Pluto? I know you are just trying to be a smartass, but you simply come off as ignorant.

Saturn's moon Titan has a huge pile of hydrocarbons in the form of methane.  Try to explain that with biology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_(moon)

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 18:05 | 1318293 Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

Exactly, and the space tankers can go there, too. Not that there is any limit to hydrocarbons on the Earth (can you imagine God creating the Earth like that?! not likely!)  But if there were limits here are on Earth there are hydrocarbons all over the solar system, just as you say! We just need to figure out that little problem of moving them in and out of gravity wells. Should be no big deal. Limits are for pussies.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:45 | 1318671 FrankDrakman
FrankDrakman's picture

Silly Rex. The gravity well on Titan is a lot smaller than the one on earth, since Titan is only about 25% of the Earth's mass. And when the tankers get back to earth, we'll be finished building huge vertical pipelines. The tankers will go into LEO, unload, and head back out using their nuclear engines.

What could possible go wrong?

Mon, 05/30/2011 - 09:50 | 1322270 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Do the following calculation. Compute the escape velocity on Titan and Earth, next look up the formula for the average velocity of a molecule as a function of surface temperature and molecule mass. Then compare Titan and Earth. Discuss your observation here at the Hedge with all of us 

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:09 | 1318173 Slim
Slim's picture

For what it's worth most E&P are looking at top ranges of $60-$80 maximum for projects to be viable.  With $80 as their very top...what does that say about the conviction in pricing they have about the commodity which is absolutely central to their entire reason for being in business.  Certainly they may be wrong but it's a data point I'd consider.

I'll also point out the obvious that as price rises supply massively expands in a non-linear fashion.  The supply of oil that can be profitably extractred at $150bbl is MUCH more than 50% greater than the supply of profitable $100 oil.  I'm not going to tell you that oil is limitless but a lot of people seem to be missing that key. 

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:06 | 1317254 Zing
Zing's picture

Well someone failed Econ 101

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:11 | 1317294 CPL
CPL's picture

http://gregor.us/fossil-fuels/speculator-ghosts-in-the-oil-machine/?utm_...

 

Yes he did.  he's talking just like a suburbanite slob that thinks $100 dollars a barrel is expensive.  It's cheap, because even if it does slip a couple of pennies, the buyers are no longer Americans and Europeans.  They are the 80 million people in China that own cars, the 120 million trucks to transport food and materials.  70 million buses.

I'm not even going to mention India since the author is convinced NG, Electrical is in the future, even though it would require a 10 trillion dollar infrastructure overhaul.

 

All because he doesn't like his dollar losing value and the fact is oil is cheap already.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:25 | 1317347 Abitdodgie
Abitdodgie's picture

You have to love the" Tata nano"

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:03 | 1317813 pops
pops's picture

Doesn't that mean "tiny tit?"

 

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:06 | 1317272 bigdawg
bigdawg's picture

I think he means you should get short.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:10 | 1317277 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture
Peak oil and the Fall of the Soviet Union: Lessons on the 20th Anniversary of the Collapse:

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7878

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:21 | 1317328 Turkey
Turkey's picture

+1 for all relevant oildrum links.  A+ site.  (along with zerohedge, of course)

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:26 | 1317374 samsara
Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:53 | 1317512 tarsubil
tarsubil's picture

Of course! LOL.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:04 | 1318742 jdrose1985
jdrose1985's picture

The collapse of the USSR and the link between grain and oil.

http://www.aei.org/docLib/20070419_Gaidar.pdf

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:07 | 1317279 NidStyles
NidStyles's picture

Go long horses.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:59 | 1317800 Rusty Shorts
Rusty Shorts's picture

Hunter Gatherer Bitchez's

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:58 | 1318010 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Yeah but if that happens women will want their rights back, considering that gathering produces as much nutrition as hunting (if not more).

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:20 | 1318888 Rusty Shorts
Rusty Shorts's picture

good   sweet jesus !!! every little bit helps.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!