This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: Past Peak Oil - Why Time Is Now Short

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by Chris Martenson

Note:  With so much going on with Europe's debt crisis, the continuing disaster and economic contraction in Japan, and the potential for a very hard landing in the Chinese growth miracle (which is in the running as my favorite "black swan candidate" for 2011), I am going to return our attention to oil in this report.  The next report will assess the developing and unfolding debt crisis that will drag down most of the developed economies at some point, and this report will provide essential context for understanding why this result is inevitable and when it will occur.

The Next Oil Shock

The only thing that could prevent another oil shock from happening before the end of 2012 would be another major economic contraction.  The emerging oil data continues to tell a tale of ever-tightening supplies that will soon be exceeded by rising global demand.  This time, we will not be able to blame speculators for the steep prices we experience; instead, we will have nothing to blame but geology.

Back in 2009, I wrote a pair of reports in which I calculated that we’d see another price spike in oil by 2010 or 2011, based on some assumptions about global GDP growth rates, rates of decline in existing oil fields, and new projects set to come online.  Given the recent price spike in oil (Brent crude over $126, now at $115) and recent oil supply data, those predictions turned out to be quite solid (for reference, oil was trading in the low $60s at the time). 

One part I whiffed on was in my prediction that the world community would have embraced the idea of Peak Oil by now and begun adjusting accordingly, but that’s not really true except in a few cases (e.g. Sweden).  Perhaps things are being differently and more seriously considered behind closed doors, but out in public the dominant story line concerns reinvigorating consumer demand, not a looming liquid fuel crisis.

How the major economies can continue proceeding with a business-as-usual mindset given the oil data is really quite a mystery to me, but that’s just how things happen to be at the moment.

At any rate, with Brent crude oil having lofted over $100/bbl at the beginning of February and remained above that big, round number for four months now, we are already in the middle of a price shock.  It may not be a perfect repeat of the circumstances of the 2008 oil shock, but it's close enough that the risk of an economic contraction, at least for the weaker economies, is not unthinkable here.  Japan, now in recession and 100% dependent on oil imports, comes to mind.

Looking at the new data and reading even minimally between the lines of recent International Energy Agency (IEA) statements, I am now ready to move my ‘Peak Oil is a statistically unavoidable fact’ event to sometime in 2012, which tightens my prediction from the prior range of 2012-2013.

Upon this recognition, the next shock will drive oil to new heights that are currently unimaginable for most.  First, $200/bbl will be breached, then $300, and then more.  And these are in current dollar terms; any additional dollar weakness will simply be additive to the actual quoted price.  By this I mean that if oil were to trade at $200 but the dollar lost one half of its value along the way, then oil would be priced at $400. 

Stampeding Into a Box Canyon

In 2009, I wrote a special report on oil that explored the interplay between energy and the economy.  At that time, the stock market was in the tank, global growth was in a freefall, and things looked gloomy.

But I knew that thin-air money is not without its charms and that we’d experience a rebound of sorts.  Here’s what I wrote:

I am of the opinion that these trillions and trillions of dollars, which, along with their foreign equivalents, are being applied to “ease the credit crunch,” will eventually find their mark and deliver what feels like a legitimate rebound in activity.  All those trillions have to eventually go somewhere and do something. 

For now, debts are defaulting faster than the various central banks and governments can inject new money and borrowing activity into the system.  Banks aren’t lending because there are very few compelling loans to make, especially if future losses have to actually be carried by the bank making the loan. 

But this won’t be true forever.  Sooner or later, all the trillions of new dollars will trot out of the barn, begin to gallop, and then thunder off, creating the appearance of a healthy advance.

It will be a cruel illusion, though, as this stampeding herd of money is headed straight into a box canyon.

Money is only one component of growth.  As we’ve strenuously proposed, energy is a necessary prerequisite for growth.

(Source)

Well, here we are a couple of years later, with those trillions and trillions out of the barn and stampeding off trying to create some real and lasting economic growth.  As we score these efforts, it appears to us that the amount and type of growth that has been achieved is underwhelming, to say the least. 

Housing remains in a serious slump, wage-based income growth is poor, Europe remains mired in a serious debt crisis, Japan has slumped back into recession, and the US fiscal deficit is a structural nightmare.  Worse, GDP growth is relatively tepid and would be negative, deeply negative, without all the deficit spending and liquidity measures. 

As predicted, all that thin-air money, once released into the wild, had a mind of its own and created a serious bout of commodity inflation, especially in food and fuel, which is now seriously impacting the poor and middle classes. 

So it’s hard to call the trillions and trillions ‘well spent.’  I was hoping for better results.

Yet we can’t call the re-flation efforts a complete failure, as we are not in a serious, destructive deflation, and we’ve all been granted a bit more time to get ourselves prepared in whatever ways make sense. The gift of time has been invaluable, and for that I am grateful.  But in terms of creating a true and lasting economic miracle?  It turns out, once again, that 'printing' money electronically is no more effective than calling in the silver coin of the realm, making each unit slightly smaller, and then re-issuing it.  Real economic growth has not been created.

What has happened is that false demand, spurred on by trillions in thin-air money, has also spurred on renewed demand for oil, hastening the day that a geologically inspired supply/demand mismatch will finally arrive. 

We are driving at a high rate of speed into a box canyon.

World Crude Supply

Before we get into the specifics of where I think the immediate trouble lies in the world oil data, let's take a moment to look at the big picture.

There are a number of ways to look at the petroleum data.  The one I prefer to look at is something called 'crude + condensate' (C+C), which leaves out things like ethanol and natural gas liquids, both of which are converted to 'barrel of oil equivalents' (BOE) and added to the C+C to yield total liquid fuels.  The reason I like to focus on C+C is that this is mainly conventional oil, the cheap and easy stuff, and it gives us a better idea of where we are in the Peak Oil story.

Note:  This next cluster of charts comes from data from the U. S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) that I am, frankly, uncomfortable with, so take them all with a grain of salt.  The EIA upwardly revised the data for 2010 and added between 750,000 and 800,000 barrels per day of production to each month.  This is the largest upward revision of which I am aware, and it's not yet clear to me why this occurred.  Further, the EIA obtained some of that data from IHS, which is the parent company of CERA, the organization that best qualifies for the 'influential Peak Oil deniers of the decade' award. 

And somewhat ominously, as suspect as the data may be, it has been an important source for decades for analysts, myself among them.  Quite recently, the EIA has announced that, due to budget cutbacks, it will immediately terminate the collection and distribution of international energy statistics -- right at the exact moment they are needed most.  Ugh.  Very disappointing, and all due to a $15 million budget cut. (Source). This echoes the loss of the M3 monetary statistic, which turned out to be a perfect gold-buying signal.  If this is a parallel event, it means that now is a great time to take Peak Oil more seriously.

A chart of C+C reveals that the world has been bouncing along in a channel roughly between 72 and 74 mbd since 2005:

Yes, a new high was made in December 2010 and was exceeded in January 2011, offering hope that the world could break out of this limiting band of production, but then production fell back in February due to the Libyan conflict.  I have added a purple dotted line to reflect where the data will most likely be for March after subtracting out the Libyan losses and the Saudi cutbacks.  As you can see, we will be right back in the 72-74 channel.  

Some will be tempted to write this off to a temporary setback due to the unrest in North Africa, but such unrest has always been part of the equation: Iraq, Nigeria, Kuwait, and many other countries have experienced supply disruptions along the way due to war and/or civil unrest.

Note also in this chart that oil production fell off by more than 2 mbd as a consequence of the global recession between 2008 and 2009.  From the lows in August 2009, it has since climbed more than 2.4 mbd to its current level.

Where did those gains come from?  Can we expect more? 

There's a very interesting story in here if we dig down one more layer. This next pie chart shows each region's relative contribution to the gains of 2.4 mbd that happened between August 2009 and February 2011: 

In the above chart, I had to include negative percentages for two regions, which is an odd way to display things (how does one draw a negative pie wedge?), but it still all sums to 100%.  I've included the negatives for comparison purposes and because they are important to keep in view.  It's clear that the Middle East is the most important region; no surprise there. North America is about evenly split in gains between the US (Bakken) and Canada (tar sands), and Russia and China are the major players in their respective regions.

Taking the analysis one level deeper, here are the seven major countries that contributed 88% of the August 2009 to February 2011 gains (in thousands of barrels per day): 

Saudi Arabia is the hands-down leader, being responsible for 700,000 barrels per day, or 29%, of the entire gains logged in that period.

There is a variety of interesting sub-stories that could be told across each of the other countries, but it's time to focus on the big fish.

Saudi Arabia – Where There's Smoke, There's Fire

Something is seriously wrong with the signals coming from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and I am of the opinion that KSA is having geological difficulties that are preventing it from pumping more oil.  Said plainly, I am of the mind that the KSA is already at peak.

One troubling bit of information is that Saudi Arabia justified its lowered oil output for March by claiming that the oil markets are oversupplied, even as Brent crude was perched above $120/bbl. There are several possibilities here:

  1. There really is an oil glut, and the KSA is being truthful.
  2. There is an oversupply, but only of the heavier, poorer grades of oil that the KSA has in relative abundance.
  3. The KSA can produce more, but doesn’t want to, preferring to withhold oil production in the interest of receiving higher prices.
  4. The KSA is already past peak and cannot pump more, despite its best efforts, and the oversupply issue is really just a cover story for the fact that the KSA cannot pump more even if it wanted to. 

Let’s start at the beginning of this odd tale.  Early in May, the KSA said this:

Saudi lifts April oil output to 8.5 mln bpd-sources

May 01, 2011

DUBAI/KHOBAR, Saudi Arabia, May 1 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia's crude oil output edged back up in April to around 8.5 million barrels per day (bpd) from roughly 8.3 million bpd in March as demand picks up, Saudi-based industry sources said on Sunday.

The kingdom slashed output by 800,000 bpd in March, due to oversupply, oil minister Ali al-Naimi said last month, adding that he expected production in April to be a little higher than March's level. 

So the story here is that the KSA claims to have 12.5 mbd of total capacity.  Therefore, meeting the Libyan shortfalls of 1.3 mbd should be simple enough; just open the taps and let it flow.  Yet the KSA barely cracked the 9 mbd mark, briefly, before falling back to 8.3 – 8.5 mbd, telling the world that this was a purposeful response to markets that were oversupplied.  That's one possibility.

Several analysts thought that perhaps the KSA was simply gaming the markets and trying to obtain the best possible prices:

Saudi unlikely to lift oil output quickly

May 3, 2011

WASHINGTON — Saudi Arabia is unlikely to boost oil production quickly to ease the rise of crude prices, because it needs high prices for its own increased spending, analysts at an international banking think tank said Tuesday. 

After producing 8.6 million barrels a day in 2010, the world's leading oil supplier will only kick up production to about 8.9 million barrels this year, said analysts at the Washington-based Institute of International Finance. 

"So far the production of crude oil in Saudi Arabia for the first quarter was around 8.7, 8.8 (million barrels a day). And recently some unconfirmed reports said that production dropped in March," said Garbis Iradian, the IIF's deputy director for Africa and the Middle East. 

"So we don't expect crude oil production in Saudi Arabia will rise over nine million barrels a day," he said.

While it's possible that the KSA production limitations are a matter of trying to engineer higher prices, one person I trust is Sadad Al-Husseini.  The former Aramco engineer, who has a lot of credibility in these matters, thinks that the production limits have more to do with the grades of available oil rather than any mercenary market tactics on the part of KSA.

Saudi Sweet Oil Supply Too Low to Offset Libya, al-Husseini Says

May 17, 2011

Saudi Arabia, the world’s biggest crude exporter, won’t be able to produce enough low-sulfur blends to replace lost Libyan output for refiners in Europe, said Sadad al-Husseini, a former Saudi Aramco executive. 

The country doesn’t have enough Arab Super Light to create sufficient amounts of low-sulfur, or sweet, oil similar to Libya’s grades, al-Husseini, Aramco’s former executive vice president for exploration and development, said today by e-mail.

The basic problem is that each refinery is geared for a specific and relatively narrow band of crude oil feedstocks, with the specific gravity and sulfur content being the most critical factors.  So it is not as simple as the KSA pumping more heavy sour crude to offset the lost Libyan production.  This is yet another possible explanation, and it is far more believable to me than either oversupplied markets or a pricing strategy.

The somewhat shocking news that followed just a few days after the above article was the begging by the IEA for OPEC to lift production.  Such a frank admission or plea has never been made before.  Reading between the lines, we can suspect that a serious supply shortage is looming if more oil does not find its way to market soon.

International Energy Agency Urges Oil Producers to Lift Output

May 19, 2011

PARIS — Expressing “serious concern” about elevated crude prices, the International Energy Agency on Thursday called for an increase in world oil production. It was an unusual move that highlighted consumer countries’ frustration at the failure of oil-producing nations to lift output in the face of rising demand and tighter supply.

(...)

The agency’s monthly Oil Market Report, respected by industry practitioners, has recently been warning about tightening market conditions as supply has not caught up with strong demand.

Despite commitments from Saudi Arabia, the biggest producer, to use its spare capacity to increase output and replace the supplies lost because of the uprising in Libya, the cartel’s production is now running 1.3 million barrels a day below the level seen before the crisis, according to the I.E.A.

Although the New York Times has positioned this unusual call by the IEA as perhaps a bit of political maneuvering, I feel they missed the real picture by not spending more time characterizing the mismatch between supply and demand.  If that's true, then we have a near-perfect repeat of the 2008 situation, where, in the six quarters preceding the oil price spike, demand exceeded supply in five of those quarters.

Confirming this view recently was Goldman Sachs' energy division, which said:

While near-term downside risk remains as the oil market negotiates the slowdown in the pace of world economic growth, we believe that the market will continue to tighten to critical levels by 2012, pushing oil prices substantially higher to restrain demand.

Events in the Middle East and North Africa are having a persistent impact, which leads us to increase our oil price targets. We expect that the ongoing loss of Libyan production and disappointing non-OPEC production will continue to tighten the oil market to critically tight levels in early 2012, with rising industry cost pressures likely to be felt this year.

We are now embedding in our forecasts that Libyan production losses will lead to the effective exhaustion of OPEC spare capacity by early 2012. Consequently, we are raising our Brent crude oil price forecast to $115/bbl, $120/bbl, and $130/bbl on a 3, 6, and 12 month horizon.

(Source)

There’s a lot in there, including the idea that the unrest in the Middle East will be persistent, that non-OPEC production will continue to disappoint (which it should, as nearly every non-OPEC country is past peak), and that the more globally relevant Brent contract is the right one to quote now when discussing oil, not the US-centric WTIC contract.

So count Goldman Sachs among those that are now calculating an imminent supply-demand mismatch.

The End of Easy Oil

The really big news is that the Wall Street Journal finally ran an oil piece (on the front page, no less) acknowledging the difficulties involved in Saudi Arabia regarding oil production and the extraordinary efforts that are now underway to boost production by unlocking their remaining heavy oil reserves. 

The critical parts in this story revolve around the costs of getting this oil out of the ground (in terms of both energy and money), the decades it will take to get the oil out, and the clear implication that going after such oil tells us everything we need to know about where we are in the Peak Oil story in general (and specifically in Saudi Arabia).  All the better, easier, cheaper grades are already drilled and in production.  This is what's left:

Facing Up to End of 'Easy Oil'

WAFRA, Kuwait—The Arabian Peninsula has fueled the global economy with oil for five decades. How long it can continue to do so hinges on projects like one unfolding here in the desert sands along the Saudi Arabia-Kuwait border.

Saudi Arabia became the world's top oil producer by tapping its vast reserves of easy-to-drill, high-quality light oil. But as demand for energy grows and fields of "easy oil" around the world start to dry up, the Saudis are turning to a much tougher source: the billions of barrels of heavy oil trapped beneath the desert.

Heavy oil, which can be as thick as molasses, is harder to get out of the ground than light oil and costs more to refine into gasoline. Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have embarked on an ambitious experiment to coax it out of the Wafra oil field, located in a sparsely populated expanse of desert shared by the two nations.

That the Saudis are even considering such a project shows how difficult and costly it is becoming to slake the world's thirst for oil. It also suggests that even the Saudis may not be able to boost production quickly in the future if demand rises unexpectedly. Neither issue bodes well for the return of cheap oil over the long term.

The whole story is worth a read.  I’ve excerpted quite a bit because there’s so much important information in there that I wanted you to see.  Most importantly, the mainstream media in the US is finally waking up to the idea that all of the cheap and easy oil is gone.

They’ve not yet gotten to the appreciation of the idea of Net Energy, which is the real key to understanding why the future will not resemble the past, but they are edging ever closer. And they are beginning to circle around the idea that depletion in the fields that have driven the world’s economy for the past 50 years is a critical reality.

It’s not much of a hop, skip, and a jump from there to seeing it finally named for what it is:  Peak Oil, otherwise known as the geological reality that will resist all efforts at human ingenuity and technology because it is a matter of finite limits, not of willpower or optimism.

One thing I thought the article did an especially good job of was actually delving into the engineering realities involved in the project.  The article continues:

The Wafra project, however, is far more of a challenge than traditional steam projects. As in most of the Middle East, the oil at Wafra is trapped in a thick layer of limestone that also contains minerals that can build up inside pipes and corrode equipment.

An even bigger challenge is getting the two crucial elements for generating steam: water and a source of energy to boil it. Most successful steam projects are in places with easy access to relatively pure water and a cheap fuel source, usually natural gas. Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have little of either.

With no fresh-water sources in the Arabian desert, Chevron has been forced to use salt water found in the same underground reservoirs as the oil. That water is full of contaminants that must be removed before it can be boiled and injected into the ground.

Finding the energy to boil the water will be even tougher. Chevron could use oil instead of natural gas—literally burning oil to produce oil—but that would burn profits, too. So the company likely will be forced to import natural gas from overseas, an expensive process that involves chilling it to turn it into a liquid, then shipping it thousands of miles.

Some experts are shaking their heads.

The hurdles include mineral buildups, corrosion, water impurities, and the energy costs of heating all that water into steam.  In short, getting this stuff out of the ground is going to be far more difficult and costly than prior efforts.  End of story.

The reality involved in getting at the non-conventional oil is really just a story of declining net energy; the red curtain will extend down into the luscious green space that represents the surplus energy available to society. Less net energy means less economic activity and complexity.  It means less growth.  Below a certain level, it means no growth at all.  And eventually it means persistent negative growth, a possibility not yet priced into any financial markets.

In some cases I have my concerns about whether these heroic efforts are worth the trouble at all.  Perhaps we should invest the same amount of energy, talent, and expertise in energy conservation efforts and technological development.

At this point in the timeline, it's imperative for each of us to ask ourselves: how well prepared are we for this post-Peak Oil future? Part II of this report: How To Position for the Next Oil Shock explores the probable impact the next energy crisis will have on key asset classes, employment, and society in general. As we've shown above, we likely have little time left. Use it wisely.

Click here to access Part II: How To Position for the Next Oil Shock (free executive summary; paid enrollment required to access).

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:33 | 1317931 tmosley
tmosley's picture

You have clearly never grown bacteria before.

Here's a hint--they don't just keep doubling forever until they run out of resources.  They reach a saturation point, form a biofilm, and mostly go dormant until they become less crowded, either by peeling off from the colony (as slime), or until new nutrients become available.

Humans don't have to grow forever, nor do they have to all die next Thursday just because trav said.  Numerous resources upon which we have based our civilization have "peaked" in the past, and it has not ONCE been the end.  There has never been a "permanent depression".

Basically, you pull this shit out of your ass and disregard any possibility of technological progress because you didn't think of it.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:50 | 1318248 ElvisDog
ElvisDog's picture

At the same Boeing biofuels talk, I sat next to a woman who was convinced that peak oil was a non-issue because some unknown new miracle resource would save us. She gave the example of the people of England. When they cut down most of their trees, they discovered coal. When the coal ran out, they discovered oil. When the oil runs down, she was convinced something else would save us "because it always had". I thought of saying something snarky like "past performance is no guarentee of future results" but didn't.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 18:21 | 1318320 malek
malek's picture

But if you turn that argument on its head
   "past performance is no guarantee of future failures"
it is true too.
So exactly what conclusions can you draw from those?

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 19:36 | 1318458 tmosley
tmosley's picture

The coal didn't run out.  What are you talking about?

But then, if you are just looking for defeatism, if you don't want to investigate new technologies, if you don't want to grow, learn, or evolve, then you have chosen death.  I hope for your sake that there is something on the other side.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:59 | 1318683 goldenrod
goldenrod's picture

For UK the coal production did peak around 1914.

 

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:37 | 1318901 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Don't confuse Tmosely-claven with the difference between "run out" and "peak."

He's too busy curing cancer n' shit

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:53 | 1318915 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

 

 

 

Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

 

link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

 

More eugenics bullshit:

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

#1024940

 

You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

 

The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

 

Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

 

Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

 

My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

 

NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

 

Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

 

For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

 

reply flag as junk (0) 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

#1024972

 

the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

 

So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

 

The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

 

Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

 

link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

 

___

 

Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

#839016

 

YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

 

WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

 

Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

 

They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

 

WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

 

The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

 

People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

 

 

 

 

 

Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

 

I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

 

99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

 

WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

 

Login or register to post comments

 

link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

 

___

 

More racism: 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

#1012036

 

huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

 

This is what we call a "hate fact."

 

Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

 

reply flag as junk (3) 

 

 

link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

 

___

 

So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

 

Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

 So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:26 | 1318709 ElvisDog
ElvisDog's picture

Assuming that perpetual growth is possible on a finite planet is illogical to quote the eminent Mr. Spock. Nothing in nature grows infinitely. Everything moves in cycles. Even 3% annual growth of anything is impossible over the long term (just plot y=x**1.03).

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:22 | 1318759 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Yeah, so?  Who, EXACTLY said we were going to grow forever, while constrained on this planet?

All I'm saying is that peak oil isn't the end of the world you people keep screaming about.  This depression was NOT caused by it.  PERIOD.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:21 | 1318623 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Who ever said anyone had to die next thursday, you moronic retardafuck?

You are so poorly-regarded around here not only for your stupidity but your shameless and ridiculous use of strawmen like this die next thursday, which came out of YOUR ass, or this "permanent" depression, which came out of YOUR ass.

ONLY YOU think there is a binary outcome here.  I have been PATENTLY fucking clear on what peak oil means; it is not my fault that you are too stupid to understand it.

Technological progress?  Jevon's Paradox? 

Look, do you waste a SINGLE opportunity to make a fool out of yourself?

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:14 | 1318831 tmosley
tmosley's picture

lol, you keep saying I am "poorly regarded" or some such gibberish, but that is not the case.  You are the one who constantly accumulates junks, not me.

And yeah, your dumbshit argument is that "PEAK OIL IS HERE OMFG WERE ALL GONNA DIE NUTHIN U CAN DO!"

You are the one who CONTINUES to frame the argument around "Peak Oil is the only thing that matters, and it's here now".  I have demonstrated new technology that will bring production up to fucking warp speed.  Sure, oil production will "peak", the way candle production peaked, and the way whale oil peaked, and the way charcoal production peaked, but it won't be the civilization ending travesty that you seem to be claiming all the time with your incessant shouting and calling people idiots.

And no, YOU are the one who said peak oil would bring about a permanent depression.  Not me.  I told you that technology would advance, and it fucking HAS, in the short time since we had that conversation.

I can't find where you came out and said it to me in those exact words, but here is you expressing the same sentiment:


by trav7777 
on Mon, 05/31/2010 - 13:47
#384127

There won't be a return to growth; there is no recovery.  Energy supply has peaked and EROI continues to decline; this is ALL you need to know.

Every single deflationist has announced their intention to get out of paper and into real at the height of the deflation.  All of them.

http://188.126.66.68/article/mr-denninger-and-gold-or-why-dollar-deflati... Then we have this gem:
Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 |  trav7777 (Total Score:1) wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins. genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE
http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi... Fuck, even with confronted with some radical new technology (which was probably a fraud), ie nickel fusion, you went on and on about how we would run out of nickel!  Fucking NICKEL!  You know, the shit the core is composed of!  And this is a material that had such an enormous energy density, you could run a home off of four nickels per year!  You are so god damn fixated on resources not being infinite that you seem to want us all to die!  You literally said that even with a thousand galaxies, we would just increase our population until we all died.  Christ, it's like you don't even live on the Earth.  According to you, every fucking thing on the planet should be eating like crazy and shitting out babies until everything is gone.  But that's not what happens, is it?  We fucking ADAPT to the level of resources available to us.  And we humans go a little further, and use out MINDS (which you refuse to use for anything but thinking up new and fanciful ways of starving to death), and discover NEW resources. Why don't you go pray to Ba'al for a quick death, and leave life to those who are alive, rather than fucking cowards like yourself, for whom the whole of existence must either be handed to you on a platter in infinite abundance, or you will have none of it.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:45 | 1318906 trav7777
trav7777's picture

You have demonstrated NOTHING OF THE KIND.

You have ONE university that recently did ONE experiment and you already have penciled in a MASSIVE rise in production...only a stupid prick would try to be so shamelessly dishonest as you have been.

Your strawman claims are pathetic.  I never said ANYBODY was dying next fucking tuesday...those are YOUR CLAIMS.

YOU are the one who gave Tokyo a fuckin WEEK "tops" before everyone was dead or evacuated, you hysterical moron.  I have said "no growth."  Simple as that.  I've been RIGHT!  As documented by ZERO fking HEDGE itself, there IS NO GROWTH.  We are in aggregate contraction, EXACTLY as I have predicted.

The reason I and so many others call you an idiot is because you ARE one.

And for the ELEVENTY BILLIONTH time, I did NOT SAY nickel would RUN OUT.  I said its production would PEAK.  Do you fucking YET get the difference, you depraved mendicant?  And the core is composed of it...so we will mine the motherfucking earth's core now?

JFC, GET TO YOUR MEETING, the village you came from is missing its idiot.

I don't want us all to die, people like YOU need to die, fucking idiots.  You are STUPID, get it?  Irretrievably STUPID.

As far as eugenics...wtf does that have to do with Peak Oil?  Answer: nothing.  You cannot even compose a cogent or rational argument.  Everything is strawmen, ad hominem, ignoratio elenchi...you are a tour de force of logical fallacy, Cliff.

Now get your stupid ass back to your 12-step idiots program

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:54 | 1318916 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

 

 

 

Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

 

link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

 

More eugenics bullshit:

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

#1024940

 

You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

 

The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

 

Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

 

Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

 

My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

 

NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

 

Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

 

For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

 

reply flag as junk (0) 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

#1024972

 

the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

 

So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

 

The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

 

Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

 

link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

 

___

 

Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

#839016

 

YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

 

WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

 

Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

 

They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

 

WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

 

The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

 

People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

 

 

 

 

 

Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

 

I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

 

99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

 

WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

 

Login or register to post comments

 

link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

 

___

 

More racism: 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

#1012036

 

huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

 

This is what we call a "hate fact."

 

Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

 

reply flag as junk (3) 

 

 

link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

 

___

 

So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

 

Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

 So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:48 | 1317629 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

We have to learn how to use it (energy).

In the meantime sit back and let OPEC lie about their reserves, let a pastor tell you Alaska has so much oil it will mitigate the world's demand of 80 million barrels a day, and pretend like EROEI means nothing!  Great thinking by everyone.  Finite resources?  What finite resources?  The world is flush with oil!

Solar voltaic is made out of petroleum.  Do you understand?  It is made from oil.  Algae is not a proven source of energy, and there is no way it can mitigate 80 million b/d of demand.  And if technology is improved it will quicken output and the peak will come sooner.  And oil sands...you want to destroy our forests to get a commodity that has a low EROEI.  So let's destroy nature for a wee bit of energy.  Fucking brilliant.

Seriously though, do you have a time machine or some other form of technology that will help mitigate peak oil, or are you sassy for nothing?

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:38 | 1317939 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Oil sands CURRENTLY have a low EROEI because you have to heat them to get the oil out.  Ionic liquids extract the oil with ZERO energy input.  The solvent is recovered, and you have your oil.  This is very simple, and it is happening, as much as your Luddite brain wants to deny it.

But then, the Cult of Death Worship has taken deep root here on ZH.  Any threat to the ideal of impending death for all is shouted down, no matter what it is.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:06 | 1318024 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

If gold goes to $15k and America backs its monie constitutionally then oil producers will buy our bonds, and oil will trade to those who deserve it.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:21 | 1318627 trav7777
trav7777's picture

sure they do, Cliff.  One research team from one university and you have PENCILED IT IN as a savior.

This is why people call you a moron.  Ionic liquids won't obviate Peak Oil, you fuckin dipshit.  If oil production doubles again...then what?  You think it will continue to double forever?  Are you really that stupid?

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:16 | 1318833 tmosley
tmosley's picture

You keep yakking, and you keep proving yourself to be a fucking idiot.  There are other energy sources on the Earth.  More oil buys us more time to do more research and capital investment.  But fuck that, you just want us all to admit that we have to start eugenics and fucking murder each other because you're a fucking sociopath.

lol, I guess we should throw out Newton's laws--they only came from a single guy at a single university.  Same with Einstein.  Fuck, let's throw out any form of information that disagrees with your dumb shit hypothesis that we are all going to die next Thursday from peak oil disease.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:50 | 1318908 trav7777
trav7777's picture

look, how many ways can you be bitchslapped on this topic before you realize that everyone is laughing at you?  We are LAUGHING at you, Cliff.

There's a HUGE difference between Newton's Law and a minor experiment at a university that bears some relevance to oilsands.

Only a dishonest, dissembling IDIOT like you would try to make this analogy.  I mean, GFD, are you expending effort to look this stupid or is it like your one natural talent?

"there are other energy sources on the earth..." LOL...so WHAT?  WTF does that have to do with whether oil will peak?

More oil buys us more time...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...you don't understand exponential compounding, do you?  GFD you are dumb.  Just plain, flat, seriously DUMB.

Predictions of dying next thursday come from hysterics like you with your calls for the ENTIRETY of Tokyo to be dead by April 2, in a "week, tops."  You freakin clown.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:52 | 1318917 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

 

 

 

Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

 

link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

 

More eugenics bullshit:

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

#1024940

 

You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

 

The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

 

Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

 

Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

 

My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

 

NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

 

Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

 

For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

 

reply flag as junk (0) 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

#1024972

 

the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

 

So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

 

The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

 

Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

 

link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

 

___

 

Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

#839016

 

YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

 

WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

 

Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

 

They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

 

WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

 

The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

 

People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

 

 

 

 

 

Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

 

I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

 

99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

 

WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

 

Login or register to post comments

 

link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

 

___

 

More racism: 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

#1012036

 

huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

 

This is what we call a "hate fact."

 

Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

 

reply flag as junk (3) 

 

 

link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

 

___

 

So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

 

Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

 So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:13 | 1319227 trav7777
trav7777's picture

you've LOST IT.  Now you're going to spam a bunch of shit on a completely different topic rather than face the music that you are an idiot?

Make another prediction for us, Cliff.  Silver to 49 by 2 weeks ago?

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:11 | 1318693 FrankDrakman
FrankDrakman's picture

When the first CAFE regulations were put in place in the 70's, the Big Three (remember them?) all said it was ridiculous to expect cars to average 25 miles to the gallon. Now, there are plenty of cars that routinely get 40-50 MPG.

There are plenty of buses running around that use LNG instead of oil, and we've got plenty of gas (you should excuse the expression).

Finally, hybrid electric cars which run on electric motors but have a gas motor to charge the battery have the potential to make another big leap in fuel economy. The biggest reason is in stop and go city traffic, electric cars use very little energy when they're not moving. And a gas engine powering a generator can run at a constant rpm, which also maximizes efficiency.

I'm not saying we should be complacent, but there are plenty of existing technologies that we're not using that would reduce the amount of oil we use. When gasoline gets back up to $6 a gallon, there will be lots of demands for hybrids. As a free market believer, I'm for letting  the market send us price signals. I like that idea a lot better than energy czars.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:48 | 1318910 trav7777
trav7777's picture

two words:  Jevon's Paradox.

Ok, a few more words: DO NOT SPEAK if you are ignorant.  Stop assuming your opinion is worth a shit.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:57 | 1318919 tmosley
tmosley's picture

There is a reason Trav doesn't want you to post:

Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

 

 

 

Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

 

link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

 

More eugenics bullshit:

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

#1024940

 

You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

 

The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

 

Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

 

Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

 

My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

 

NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

 

Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

 

For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

 

reply flag as junk (0) 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

#1024972

 

the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

 

So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

 

The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

 

Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

 

link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

 

___

 

Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

#839016

 

YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

 

WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

 

Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

 

They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

 

WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

 

The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

 

People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

 

 

 

 

 

Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

 

AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

 

I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

 

99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

 

WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

 

Login or register to post comments

 

link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

 

___

 

More racism: 

 

 

 

by trav7777 

on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

#1012036

 

huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

 

This is what we call a "hate fact."

 

Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

 

reply flag as junk (3) 

 

 

link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

 

___

 

So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

 

Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

 So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:14 | 1319229 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Godwin's Law....you lose.  Again.

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 21:56 | 1320123 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Godwin's Law doesn't apply when the party being compared to Nazis or Hitler is literally advocating their exact policies.

You fucking mass murdering sociopath.  Pray we never meet in person.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:23 | 1317642 gorillaonyourback
gorillaonyourback's picture

do you have any idea how much energy replacement you need to make up for from oil.  its not only the stuff in your cars gas tank. its plastics, pesticides,food production,,,, etc the list goes on and on.  there is not plenty!   the only hope is cold fusion but its 50 years away and that will take a huge infrastructure investment,  and its not proven possible yet

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:34 | 1317718 tarsubil
tarsubil's picture

Fusion has been 50 years away for over 50 years. Of course, the Sun is a fusion reactor and it may put out more energy than current oil production. I'm not sure because I cheated on my tests in Laws of Thermodynamics class.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:52 | 1318245 Pope Clement
Pope Clement's picture

Don't worry Tar you haven't missed much as theoretical physics and other scientific disciplines (i.e astronomy, astro-physics etc.)have been intellectual backwaters for a hundred years. Actually much more likely that the sun is an anode on a galactic circuit rather than fusion driven (see electrical engineer Don Scott's tome 'The Electric Sun' and http://www.electric-cosmos.org/. Probably a good idea to pay more attention to research and theories based on laboratory experimenters such as the above rather than the 'denk' experiment mathematicians and the beautiful equation crafters...

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 17:34 | 1319798 tarsubil
tarsubil's picture

Thanks for the link. Pretty cool.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:26 | 1317663 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Tom,

The scarcity argument is wrong.  What people need to consider is how much energy is used to extract the oil.  If the energy in the oil that is extracted is less than the energy used to get the oil, NO ONE will make that investment. Econ 101.  We will stop using oil long before the supply is gone because it won't be worth investing the gold.  

Don't feed the trolls,

Of course, if there isn't something else to replace oil maybe we should fatten the trolls up a bit.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:43 | 1317959 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Yes, the energy invested IS important.  What people fail to understand is that that quantity is NOT SET IN STONE.  It can be changed.  You apply capital to make it easier to extract.  You commit capital to research and come up with ways to sidestep the problem.  Ionic liquids are one such advance which have come about only in the past few months (or rather, they have only been applied to this problem in the last few months).

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:37 | 1318222 Toxicosis
Toxicosis's picture

The presence of capital does not make oil easier to extract.  Just because you throw money or capital at a problem does not equate with the desired result.  Geology will impose limitations on technology.  We may be able to circumvent obstacles even for awhile, however, if the oil is not there to be found then efforts are fruitless or insane.  Oil being finite is accepted as reality.  Dribs and drabs found here and there from existing or exhausted oil fields will not by any strectch of the imagination meet the demand of more for energy, no matter how much money we throw at it or how much we want it.  Diminishing returns on technology will be noted when the EROEI becomes less and less viable, and heavy sour crude is the dominant oil extracted.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 19:44 | 1318465 tmosley
tmosley's picture

The presence of capital doesn't make oil easier to extract?

What, you think we dig oil up with our bare hands?  Are you fucking retarded or something?

Just like pumps make it easier to extract oil than digging with bare hands, so does fracturing and anionic liquid make that which is trapped in rock pores flow easily.  Ionic liquids will at least double the total recovery on ALL oil wells that have ever been drilled, and at a high rate on any given one.

I suggest you learn a little something about the world before you spout off about how capital doesn't aid extraction.  You sound VERY stupid, even though I am sure you, and others here are not.  You are just caught up in the cult of Death Worship.

There is ALWAYS a way forward.

Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:27 | 1318628 trav7777
trav7777's picture

wow...we have one university publishing results from a set of experiments, and you already have oil recovery DOUBLING "at least"

Do you ever think to yourself, "Cliff, now, you went and made a complete fucking idiot of yourself yesterday, so just shut the fuck up today so it doesn't happen again"?  Or do you charge right in here and just fall off the wagon?

You need to form Idiots Anonymous and do some 12-steps

Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:24 | 1318841 tmosley
tmosley's picture

What the fuck are you even talking about?

You just keep repeating that everything that I say is wrong because I constantly own your dumb ass on every fucking subject we cross swords on.  

You know, I spent some time going through your old posts, and I found a few gems that seems to explain your true motivation (obsession) with this peak oil nonsense:

 

by trav7777 
on Sat, 03/05/2011 - 19:35
#1022572
  • flag as junk (7) 
  •  

    there's adequate genetic diversity WITHIN individual races and far more than sufficient within the high IQ races that we do not need the diversity of the others.

    A global sterilization of everyone with an IQ less than 100 would still provide beyond ample genetic diversity.  There would be a pretty sharp dropoff in the population numbers of certain protected classes, but those could rebuild over time.


     

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

    You are a genuine god damn sociopath that wants nothing more than to sterilize 95% of the human race (further down in your threat you wanted to set your "bar" at 140).  THAT is the reason for your fearmongering.  THAT explains your god damn racism.  THAT explains your utter HATRED for me, someone who offers a real path forward.

    You need to fucking kill yourself.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:56 | 1318918 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    HAHAHAHAHAHA...so were you owning me when you made a half a dozen ABSURD predictions that fell completely the fuck apart within a week?

    Or were you "owning" me when you spouted shit about oil not peaking only to retreat off that and try to reframe the discussion into your field of strawmen about people "dying next thursday"?  And who can forget your bold silver price predictions?  You're not owning anything, Cliff, other than the title of Stupidest Idiot.  Your village must really miss you, because you are a goddamned jester.

    I need to fucking kill YOU, not myself.  the world ain't short on idiots, Cliff; we don't need more of you.  You offer nothing except the same old cornucopian bullshit.

    Nothing I said on eugenics is untrue.  NOTHING.  You just don't like it and you are a mindfucked lemming.  Probably because you know you would be sterilized.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:56 | 1318921 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Trav isn't joking when he says he wants to murder me.  He is a sociopath, as I have ow proven:

    Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

     

     

     

    Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

    trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

    genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

     

    link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

     

    More eugenics bullshit:

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

    #1024940

     

    You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

     

    The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

     

    Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

     

    Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

     

    My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

     

    NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

     

    Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

     

    For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

     

    reply flag as junk (0) 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

    #1024972

     

    the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

     

    So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

     

    The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

     

    Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

     

    link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

     

    ___

     

    Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

    #839016

     

    YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

     

    WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

     

    Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

     

    They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

     

    WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

     

    The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

     

    People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

     

     

     

     

     

    Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

     

    I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

     

    99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

     

    WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

     

    Login or register to post comments

     

    link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

     

    ___

     

    More racism: 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

    #1012036

     

    huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

     

    This is what we call a "hate fact."

     

    Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

     

    reply flag as junk (3) 

     

     

    link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

     

    ___

     

    So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

     

    Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

     So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

    And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:36 | 1318715 ElvisDog
    ElvisDog's picture

    But assuming that the anionic process you describe does work as advertised. That only increases the depletion rate. The field produces more oil for awhile, but doesn't increase the ultimate amount of oil in the field. That field is still going to run dry even all these fancy extraction techniques, which still leaves us with the situation of how do we achieve permanent growth with declining oil?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:46 | 1318727 FrankDrakman
    FrankDrakman's picture

    That only increases the depletion rate.

    Huh?! It enables you to get oil out of fields that you would have considered depleted before. It increases the total amount of oil recoverable, and extends their life at the same time. 

    30 or 40 years ago, there were tremendous problems getting usable oil out of Alberta's tar sands. Now, new technologies make it easier and less expensive every year. This has made a resource that wasn't economical to extricate cost-effective. Fracturing rock is releasing huge amounts of oil in the Bakken field.

    Thomas Edison was famous for saying "There's a better way - find it". What has happened to America that so many of you are now defeatist?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:39 | 1318779 Toxicosis
    Toxicosis's picture

    Not defeatist under any circumstance, but realistic. Take for example a stage 4 bone cancer(osteosarcomic) patient. No matter how much chemo or radiation you may provide for the patient, or possible technological endeavour you wish to introduce into said patient's care, chances of success are slim to none. Acceptance that death and not living forever are inevitable consequences and that we as humans also have limitations is a realistic, not pessimistic attitude. In fact it is a grown-up attitude. I'm not happy that oil is on a steady decline, but denying it just induces more pain and distress which will be horrifically ratcheted up in its intensity if you wait until the last minute before accepting and dealing with the reality setting in.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:32 | 1318844 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Bullshit.  Identify a protein on the surface of the cancer cell that isn't on the others, and I'll combine my company's antimicrobial technology with targeted phage display peptide technology and make you a cure in a year.

    THERE IS A WAY.  You just have to be willing to look for it.  And when it is staring you in the face, like this ionic liquid technology, you have to recognize the potential and apply it.  That is why my company is finally starting to move on drug development, rather than a focus on antimicrobial materials for medical, commercial, and industrial purposes only.  Trials on prostate cancer are about to start.  This particular compound will work on prostate cancer even after metastasis.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:55 | 1318920 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    yeah, sure, Cliff, you are going to cure cancer in a "year, tops."

    Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

    Is there ANYONE here who still thinks you have an ounce of credibility?  You're so stupid you are a danger to anyone around you.  Your life savings lost 30% in a couple of weeks and you are desperate to lash out at anyone who disagrees with you, as well as to hope that everybody just forgets the manifold absurd predictions that you made.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:00 | 1318923 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Yes, sociopaths project their own failings and characteristics onto others:

    Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

     

     

     

    Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

    trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

    genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

     

    link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

     

    More eugenics bullshit:

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

    #1024940

     

    You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

     

    The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

     

    Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

     

    Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

     

    My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

     

    NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

     

    Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

     

    For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

     

    reply flag as junk (0) 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

    #1024972

     

    the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

     

    So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

     

    The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

     

    Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

     

    link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

     

    ___

     

    Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

    #839016

     

    YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

     

    WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

     

    Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

     

    They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

     

    WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

     

    The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

     

    People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

     

     

     

     

     

    Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

     

    I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

     

    99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

     

    WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

     

    Login or register to post comments

     

    link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

     

    ___

     

    More racism: 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

    #1012036

     

    huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

     

    This is what we call a "hate fact."

     

    Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

     

    reply flag as junk (3) 

     

     

    link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

     

    ___

     

    So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

     

    Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

     So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

    And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 01:13 | 1318881 FrankDrakman
    FrankDrakman's picture

    How realistic is to just accept that oil is declining when we can 1) expand the supply through new technologies, and 2) reduce use by just using EXISTING technologies? As I said in an earlier post, just letting the prices rise for gas will expand the demand for hybrids considerably. Here in Toronto, we have a reasonably effective transit system, and yet I see buses pulled over in terminals for the drivers' breaks AND THE BUSES ARE RUNNING ALL THE TIME. We just waste oil in hundreds of ways, and it isn't rocket science to correct them. Look at the new nozzles on gas pumps; they create a mini-seal so no gas is spilled. I worked in a gas station as a teenager; we probably spilled a quart or so a day. Doesn't sound like much, but multiply by the year, and by tens of thousands of filling stations. Toronto has a pair of streets that could easily be made into one-way streets with synchronized lights (one north, one south), which would greatly reduce the amount of gas wasted idling at stop lights, but the anti-car Nazis here constantly refuse to consider it.

    Like I said, we can't afford to be complacent, but at the same time, there are simple measures and existing technologies we can use, and we just don't.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:45 | 1318232 samsara
    samsara's picture

    What people fail to understand is that that quantity is NOT SET IN STONE.  It can be changed

    Hey,  if you're hunting this weekend,  bring me back some Passenger Pigeons,    I heard just because their gone,  their quantity can be changed back to a positive number...

     

     

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 19:47 | 1318466 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    So you are saying that because EROEI is not a constant, that I can bring the dead back to life, and that if I can't bring the dead back to life, then EROEI is constant?

    Do you understand how retarded your argument is?  Do you understand that you have abandoned logic, reason, and fact for the sweet embrace of death?

    I suggest you go pray to Ba'al for a quick death, and leave life to the living, you zombie fuck.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:31 | 1318637 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    and in the same breath you throw up a strawman of the binary outcome of "status quo or death"...

    go to your meeting, Cliff

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:32 | 1318847 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Uhhh, where did I say THAT?

    I said technological advances exist, and you say that it's one university doing it, so it doesn't count, or some stupid shit.

    Face it, your fucking jerk-off fantasy of killing all the niggers based on IQ scores is going to have to be put off a few centuries.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:37 | 1317715 DosZap
    DosZap's picture

    TM, Right on.

    Only problem is that provides a solution.

    As stupid as I am , I understand the energy sources you alluded to.

    at 93 million miles away, there is a free source of energy, all we need do is put it to work.

    And how easy it would be to harness it.

    The issue is if they did, they LOSE control.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:55 | 1317795 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    you just don't understand the difference between energy and power

    the oil production curve is a measure of POWER, not energy.

    Reserves are a measure of energy, the rate of extraction is what we care about- nothing else.

    So what if the sun rains down energy?  It took about a billion years to condense that into something we'll pump dry in 200.  And you morons want to again double our power rate....wow.

    How easy would it be to "harness" the fucking sun, then, genius?  Go rope a unicorn while you're up.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:23 | 1317886 tarsubil
    tarsubil's picture

    The peak oiler's motto: yes, we can't!

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:49 | 1318260 Toxicosis
    Toxicosis's picture

    Geology, not peak oil.  No man or woman is ever more intelligent than the facts.  When you can bring back the dead, Jesus, you should let us all know so that we may be impressed by your defying of reality.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:44 | 1317967 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Yeah, so shut up and don't do any research and just sit there and DIE!

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:55 | 1318273 Toxicosis
    Toxicosis's picture

    If it turns out that you're wrong, and oil prices keep escalating in an upward direction, food becomes scarce, there is chaos in the streets, and gasoline products become out of reach or unavailable, will you still hold out for a miracle, or for technology to come to the rescue???

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 19:53 | 1318475 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    I didn't say those things wouldn't happen.  But they won't happen because "Peak Oil deemed such to be fate, now and forever".  It will happen because of hyperinflation.  It won't be forever.  Just a sickness, not a sickness unto death, as you Death Worshippers would have it.

    You don't even understand your own hypothesis.  Peak Oil doesn't mean that oil runs out.  It means that it gets more and more expensive until only the very few super rich can afford it any more.

    The thing is, there is a cap on that process, because you can PRODUCE oil for a price that is less than infinite.  Indeed, as such processes are adopted, and as money is poured into research, the price WILL come down.  Whether economies of scale reduce the price on currently known processes, or new processes are invented, prices WILL NOT rise forever.

    Technology is unlikely to "save" us, until government has moved its fat ass out of the way.  The current regime of environmental regulation and subsidy on energy production has made it impossible to make economic decisions on energy production.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:34 | 1318645 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    YOU don't fucking understand Peak Oil, you effing MORON.

    Peak Oil is NOT about price, it is about maximum RATE of net production.

    Please, GET TO YOUR STUPIDAHOLICS ANONYMOUS meeting; you're off the wagon again.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:48 | 1318728 Toxicosis
    Toxicosis's picture

    You might as well just leave it alone Trav.  He's living in a box of ignorance, arrogance, uneducatedness, and absolute misinformation and denial.  We can present evidence, facts, assessments, and clear direction based on science and the scientific method but his inability to comprehend such things as reality leaves much to be desired.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:36 | 1318850 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Say the guys who ignore the evidence shoved right into their stupid faces.

    Ionic liquids exist.  You don't get to kill all the blacks this time.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 16:50 | 1319724 tarsubil
    tarsubil's picture

    You don't understand Physics, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Fashion, Women's Studies, Social Justice Studies, Manbearpig Studies! You're a total dolt! Peak Oil killed my father and raped my mother! We need to save everyone by murder... err, I mean, sacrifi....err, I mean, liberating - yeah, yeah! that's the ticket! - liberating a couple billion people. Then we won't have to worry about Peak Oil... umm, wait...

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 18:49 | 1319910 SWRichmond
    SWRichmond's picture

    Peak Oil is NOT about price, it is about maximum RATE of net production.

    Unobtainium is in great demand and is inexpensive, therefore its production is in decline.  OMFG.  I rest my case.  I love you guys, I swear I do.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 22:44 | 1318729 ElvisDog
    ElvisDog's picture

    I won't be quite so abusive as my colleagues, but you, tmosley, need to articulate exactly how we can achieve permanent economic growth without a subsequent increase in cheap energy. The entire economic miracle of the past 150 years has been achieved for one reason - because up until now we had a continuing expansion of the supply of cheap, easy-to-extract oil. Even if your technological marvels can somehow maintain production rates (for a little while) it is going to be more expensive and more expensive energy means lower or even negative economic growth.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:35 | 1318851 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    You want me to chart out the entire course of human technological advancement from here to eternity?

    Are you serious?  I can see a few possible next steps.  Your default view seems to be that the world ends just beyond the horizon.  Pretty stupid, it seems to me, as we have crossed the horizon hundreds of times, and it has yet to end.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:17 | 1319232 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    You've never let ignorance stop you in the past, Cliff, why let it now?

    Chart it out for us like you did with silver.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:46 | 1318952 Urban Redneck
    Urban Redneck's picture

    @Toxicosis -

    If it turns out that you're wrong, and oil prices keep escalating in an upward direction, food becomes scarce, there is chaos in the streets, and gasoline products become out of reach or unavailable, will you still hold out for a miracle, or for technology to come to the rescue???

    Oil prices can easily continue escalating when measured in USD, food can become scarce, there is chaos in the streets, and gasoline products may become out of reach or unavailable - NONE OF THIS IS DEPENDENT ON PEAK OIL - Hell it happened in Libya recently and they have plenty of oil.

     

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 12:44 | 1319373 Toxicosis
    Toxicosis's picture

    I don't see your point here.  I'm indicating that on the other side of this peak virtually all of us in developed, developing, or underdeveloped nations dependent on oil and oil based products will suffer from an energy deficit.  Sure you don't need peak oil, but it sure as hell doesn't help.  Solutions to this would be great, however, substitution is not as easy for the amounts of BTU's we require all over the planet to run the things we do now in the way we do now.  Hydrocarbons are NOT electricity, thus peak oil and gasoline type products will put our modern western and up and coming societies at a great energy disadvantage to the point of severe contraction.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 13:07 | 1319400 Urban Redneck
    Urban Redneck's picture

    I see that now thanks, I missed a couple posts when scrolling through the trav/tmos running street fight for the nth time in the thread. 

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:30 | 1318642 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    there you go again with that binary outcome strawman, Cliff?  Will you EVER shut the fuck up?  Is it some genetic disease that makes you a stupidaholic?

    Go to your 12-step meeting and stop falling off the wagon.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:01 | 1318924 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

     

     

     

    Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

    trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

    genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

     

    link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

     

    More eugenics bullshit:

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

    #1024940

     

    You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

     

    The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

     

    Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

     

    Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

     

    My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

     

    NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

     

    Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

     

    For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

     

    reply flag as junk (0) 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

    #1024972

     

    the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

     

    So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

     

    The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

     

    Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

     

    link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

     

    ___

     

    Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

    #839016

     

    YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

     

    WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

     

    Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

     

    They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

     

    WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

     

    The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

     

    People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

     

     

     

     

     

    Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

     

    I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

     

    99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

     

    WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

     

    Login or register to post comments

     

    link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

     

    ___

     

    More racism: 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

    #1012036

     

    huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

     

    This is what we call a "hate fact."

     

    Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

     

    reply flag as junk (3) 

     

     

    link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

     

    ___

     

    So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

     

    Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

     So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

    And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:01 | 1318822 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    are you really this stupid that you think that the earth's not being a closed system somehow obviates the 1st law?

    WTF is next out of your ass, perpetual motion?  There is no free lunch, dipshit.

    Just chant "ionic liquids" over and over again, ok?

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:40 | 1318853 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Oh, you're so right.  I forgot that the Earth was a closed system, and there was no such thing as the sun.

    Look, you need to face facts, you little shit-eating sociopath.  Your dream of sterilizing all blacks in the name of saving humanity from peak oil is fucking OVER.  It isn't going to happen.

    So just fucking kill yourself.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:56 | 1317525 tarsubil
    tarsubil's picture

    Congrats on the PhDs in Geology, Physics, and Laws of Thermodynamics (you'd think these were covered in the Geology and Physics degrees but whatever) from Samsara Online University.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:12 | 1318037 Bicycle Repairman
    Bicycle Repairman's picture

    The problem is not technological.  It is political.  So put the geology 101 textbook away.  It won't help.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:19 | 1319234 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    3 idiots, all in a row...

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:38 | 1317420 Mr Lennon Hendrix
    Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

    Yeah because no resources are finite.  The earth's core isn't lava, it is oil!  And the moon does not have water in its crust, it has oil!  We will be able to send a man mission to the far reaching moons of other planets to get their oil!  We will rip open the Rockies and live in a hell hole for oil!  EROEI what?  Nay!  I say Nay!  Oil is everywhere!  Everywhere!!!  Natural gas will solve our problems, even though none of our infrustructure is prepared to use it!  Nevermind Natural gas' EROEI is half of what crude's is!  Nevermined!  And we have coal!  Dirty filthy, stinky coal!  We should enjoy living in filth!  Filth is good!  Woop woop!  Honk honk!

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:44 | 1317452 kito
    kito's picture

    now if we could only refine your heavy crude humor into light sweet oil our imaginary energy problems would be solved!!!

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:09 | 1317586 Mr Lennon Hendrix
    Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

    Considering that the swing producer, the House of Saud, is out of their easy to get light sweet crude (low hanging fruit theory) and are using salt water to pump their reserves, I would say we could use all the light sweet crude we could get.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:52 | 1317492 AZSovreign
    AZSovreign's picture

    Now if Comet Elenin turns out to be a failed brown dwarf we may all be living in filth...

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:57 | 1317518 Bicycle Repairman
    Bicycle Repairman's picture

    Running out of whale oil was the end of the world.  I guess I simply won't face facts.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:49 | 1317493 CrashisOptimistic
    CrashisOptimistic's picture

    There are so very many civilians who need protecting on those oil fields.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:17 | 1317309 Dr. Acula
    Dr. Acula's picture

    Peak oil?

    More like confetti glut.

     

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:29 | 1317388 Mr Lennon Hendrix
    Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

    Bernanke has not done enough?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:11 | 1317576 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    1. Design Dollar gasification process

    2. Make hyperinflation

    3. Enjoy infinite energy!

    I love me some troll physics.  Your avatar must bring that out in me.

    For more troll physics: http://trollscience.com/

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:18 | 1317312 Dan The Man
    Dan The Man's picture

     

    Can't we just grow more oil?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:22 | 1317345 Dr. Acula
    Dr. Acula's picture

    Yes, e.g. corn ethanol. There are a lot of economic substitutes which will be economically viable should oil become too scarce. Of course various governments will be there to subsidize the wrong ones and hamper entrepeneurs trying to find the right ones.

     

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:29 | 1317384 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    Never a good policy to have food sources compete as energy sources.  Especially when tall grasses yield much more ethanol than does corn.

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=grass-makes-better-ethanol-than-corn

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7120/full/444673a.html

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:38 | 1317424 Dr. Acula
    Dr. Acula's picture

    >Never a good policy to have food sources compete as energy sources. 

    Fortunately for you, entrepeneurs do what consumers want, i.e. they seek financial gains. If vegetables used as fuel yield a greater objective exchange value than when they are used as food, then entrepeneurs will act accordingly. 

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:41 | 1317435 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    Fortunately for you, entrepeneurs do what consumers want, i.e. they seek financial gains.

    I will grant you that.  But, I will save that trust for capitalism, not corporatism.  Edit:  Besides, this technology is just heating up and may vindicate us both in the not too distant future..

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:51 | 1317469 Dr. Acula
    Dr. Acula's picture

    BTW thanks for your article on grasses, I will check it out.

    Probably the best plant for producing fuel will turn out to be narcotic, noxious, invasive, endangered, patented or some other BS that gets you arrested for trying to help humanity.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:00 | 1317815 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    then what happens when every square inch of the planet is devoted to these grasses?

    You guys simply don't want to have to accept basic FINITENESS, do you?

    All real-world systems have FINITE headroom.  They cannot accommodate limitless geometric growth!

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:17 | 1317868 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    If that is your world, Trav, then why is every square inch of the planet not covered in corn?  You understand how much easier, and how much less water and fertilizer is required, to grow tall grasses, than corn?  So if X Giga-acres are used for corn ethanol, ~0.5X Giga-acres would be required for grass ethanol to produce the same net amount of ethanol.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:59 | 1318282 Toxicosis
    Toxicosis's picture

    Why is the Earth not covered in tall grasses or corn????  Cause we wouldn't have land to grow food on for us to eat.  Geology and ecology are not strong points on this board tonight.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:34 | 1318652 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    AND THEN WHAT?

    You simply DON'T GRASP the problem, do you?

    After you hit that point of ethanol production YOU STILL NEED TO GROW.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 14:13 | 1319520 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    You are conveniently overlooking the zero sum population growth we are currently in. The 'Green' freaks would have us believe we are in log phase growth.  We are not.  Due to debt,  feminism and perhaps flouride in the H2O - the world's population is in decline.  Imagine how much more decline when the SHTF..

    'Growth' is overrated.  Reversion to the mean is the new reality.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 14:22 | 1319529 Flakmeister
    Flakmeister's picture

    Last I looked world population is still growing and is expected to "plateau" at around 9 billion in ~2050...

    Your reasons for non-growth instantly identify your ideological bend...

    The SHTF well before 2050...

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 16:21 | 1319633 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    The SHTF well before 2050...

    Thanks for helping to make my point..

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/human-race-doomed-deutsche-bank-one-mos...

    That trend is the Green's freind.  I will grant you that a more accurate statement would have been 'the world's population is peaking and heading for a decline'.

    As to my ideology, I never need to hide it. Doesn't surprise me that you implicitly do..

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 18:45 | 1319902 Flakmeister
    Flakmeister's picture

    Umm... it's pretty easy to enter an echo chamber that reflects your views. Try doing doing the converse and get back to me....

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 21:08 | 1320083 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    Try doing doing the converse and get back to me....

    I fight confirmation bias every day, I wonder if you introspect and challenge your own views?

    Sun, 05/29/2011 - 09:17 | 1320439 Flakmeister
    Flakmeister's picture

    I have done it for many years... after a while you start to figure stuff out in an objective manner... It tends to go against the grain. You might want to brush up on the Stoics...

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:49 | 1317971 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Trav wants to control the future, and throws a fucking hissy fit whenever anyone tells him he can't.

    What a loser.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 21:36 | 1318648 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    you're siding with the guy who wants the entire earth covered in grass for ethanol?

    WOW

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:54 | 1318796 Texas Gunslinger
    Texas Gunslinger's picture

    lol

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:42 | 1318854 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Better than siding with the guy who wants to sterilize all the niggers.  That's you, Golgothan.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:18 | 1319241 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    you just think you can drop the N word like that...wtf makes you think you are entitled to use racist epithets the way you do, punk?

    I said "everyone with IQ under 100."  FYI, that would include you.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 15:43 | 1319527 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    When I converse I put thought into my words. Do you?  Don't misconstrue what I'm saying.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:45 | 1317473 LawsofPhysics
    LawsofPhysics's picture

    Sorry, algae is the only zero-sum game.  Everything else losses, nothing is profitable.  Thermodynamics is a bitch. Now if we could only get that nuclear fission thing going, just don't let Japan take the lead on that.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:54 | 1317500 Shell Game
    Shell Game's picture

    Scale, LofP, it's all about scale.  Though, I'm liking what I've been reading on the algae technology, neat little story.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:26 | 1317678 LawsofPhysics
    LawsofPhysics's picture

    No kidding, 6 billion of us are out of luck.

    They could always bring back the ABE process and we could once again start turning all forms of waste into acetone, butanol and ethanol.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:57 | 1317991 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Actually, algae is crap, but it is crap that is available now.  I say crap because it requires a LOT of post processing, starting with pressing, then filtering, then refining.  Makes a nice, clean fuel, though.

    The better solution is genetically engineered microorganisms that emit usable fuel as waste, like yeast emit ethanol.  These already exist, and are being used to produce a wide variety of fuels.  They just need to be filtered prior to use.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 18:34 | 1318318 Pope Clement
    Pope Clement's picture

    If the universe is electrically powered see Thornhill et.al. then new paradigms of energy production could emerge and perhaps be almost free. Perhaps something akin to the 'free' energy one could tap into by laying a length of wire under transmission lines, the magnetic fields produced induce an electrical current in your length of wire...Jeezus it just hit me that all that electical energy coming from the sun ('solar wind' bitchez) - maybe that technology already exists...The great Norwegian physicist Birkeland established that aurorae were electric currents from the sun which enter earth at the poles - Haarp anyone ?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 19:54 | 1318485 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Maybe, but highly unlikely.  There are too many people doing independent research on such things for no-one to have noticed such effects.  There is certainly no conspiracy to suppress such advances (too many eyes).  

    Such advances will certainly come, but I doubt if they have already occurred.  Or if they have and they have been suppressed, then they are not easy or obvious.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:18 | 1318756 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    I am going to assume you understand that inductive current isn't free.

    There are "plans" or whatnot to put satellites up with tethers to harvest inductive current from solar winds and the like.  They just require materials with tensile strength beyond that which we are capable.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:43 | 1318859 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    No such thing as technological advance.  Not in your world, at least.  Ie the world where we sterilize all the darkies.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene

    Go kill yourself, you fucking sociopath.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:15 | 1317594 AGuy
    AGuy's picture

    I doubt the estimates are anywhere near correct for switchgrass, except that switchgrass isn't food. Corn is used because of its high starch content which can be easliy converted into sugar which yeast coverts into ethanol. Cellolose requres energy input to convert cellolose into a starch - sugar.

    Second energy from alohcol will always have a negative energy return. simply because ethanol is water soluble, and it takes a lot of energy to separate them (aka distillation) vacuum or thermal distillation. Current ethanol distillation uses natural gas.

    As soon as oil becomes too expensive, the price of NG will rise as more industrial and transportation processes are converted to use NG as a source. NG can also be processed into liquid fuels such as methanol, DME, or even diesel. But like any conversion process there are loses. Since NG is already extensively used, only a small amount of oil displacment will have a significant effect on its price. Consider if 2 to 4 mpbd of oil was displaced by NG, demand for NG would increase significantly driving up prices. If we loose production in one energy source, the costs for other will rise as demand is made up by the other sources.

    The end of the Nuclear renaissance (which never really happened) will soon put pressure in NG as power companies switch over base-load nuclear power plants to base-load NG power plants. Is already in a semi NG crisis since it relies on Russia, and many unstable suppliers. Further more, Attempt to make up falling imports from the middle east will likely be meet (or attempted) by Candian tar sands, which required NG for processsing tar-sand oil into refinable oil.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:25 | 1319248 DaveyJones
    DaveyJones's picture

    well said

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:47 | 1317482 Mr Lennon Hendrix
    Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

    To grow corn, petro fertilizers and petrochemicals are used.  After the corn is grown, transported and turned into fuel, the EROEI is negative.  Ethanol is not a substitute for crude.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:08 | 1317578 tarsubil
    tarsubil's picture

    It wasn't meant to be. ADM execs, the crop report boys in Des Moines, and Chuck Grassley needed a new pair of shoes. See you at the tower club!

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:33 | 1317664 Dr. Acula
    Dr. Acula's picture

    >EROEI is negative.  Ethanol is not a substitute for crude.

    There are many plants that can be turned into ethanol apart from corn. There are many methods of transportation and many ways of growing these plants. The market prices for the factors of production change ceaselessly.

    EROEI is an ill-defined welding-together of concepts from the disparate sciences of physics and economics. This absurd amalgamation does not enable you to determine what is and is not economically viable now or in the future. Entrepeneurs measure gains and losses in dollars, not in Joules.

     

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:57 | 1317787 Mr Lennon Hendrix
    Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

    First of all, the dollar is an amalgamation of false logic and the need to fund war cheaply, but that is neither here nor there, considering EROEI is a good way to measure how ell energy is transformed and used.  And all plants use petrochimicals.  And it may be my opinion, but we should be eating our food sources.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:05 | 1317820 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    no, EROI is a strict measure of net energy, measured in joules.  It has jackshit to do with economics.  Perhaps you don't understand what "invested" means.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:58 | 1318012 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    If you think EROEI doesn't have anything to do with economics, then you have no idea what you are talking about on either subject.

    EROEI IS ECONOMICS.  Thing is, it IS NOT A SET VALUE.  If you could get that through your thick skull, maybe you could ditch the suicide pills you have hoarded up for your kids.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 17:59 | 1318290 Toxicosis
    Toxicosis's picture

    Does it take you more energy to scrape the bottom of the barrel or less than the standing water when the barrel was full.  The barrel by the way is 1000 ft deep, and you have to use a rope and harness to get yourself down.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 18:13 | 1318310 CrashisOptimistic
    CrashisOptimistic's picture

    True.  It's not a set value.

    It's going to get worse.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 19:57 | 1318489 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Why?  Because you prayed to Ba'al to change the laws of physics?  Or you prayed to the Prince of Darkness to make men forget their knowledge?

    Why don't you pray instead for a quick death, and leave life to the living?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:31 | 1318769 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    you stupid prick, oil development and production has had an EROI that has gone down steadily over the last 150 years of technology and advancement.

    Get back to your meeting.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 02:02 | 1318925 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    Ok, to start, Trav wants Eugenics to be practiced.  He wants to "save" us from starvation caused by peak oil.  This is why he will NEVER accept the fact that new technology can every be implemented, and will deny facts that  are shoved right in his face (ie ionic liquids), or acknowledge the possibility of any form of nuclear, wind or solar application--even with another 20, 50, 100, 1000, or a billion years of research.

     

     

     

    Fri, 02/18/2011 - 15:49 | 

    trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    wtf is wrong with eugenics?  Why should we condemn the cretins to a future of starvation?  Likewise, humanity as an institution, cannot afford to have itself breeded back into the stone ages by cretins.

    genocide of inferior populations is in fact an evolutionary MANDATE

     

    link: http://argo.zerohedge.org/news/guest-post-beyond-false-dawn-global-crisi...

     

    More eugenics bullshit:

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:18

    #1024940

     

    You're an idiot...you should not reproduce.

     

    The SB IQ test was not in ANY WAY intended to promote eugenics.  IQ tests have literally nothing whatsoever to do with a DESIRE to promote one type of person over another.  Some people may have seized on them in order to justify such a promotion- in case you didn't figure out by what I said earlier, moron, I AM ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.  I pretty clearly stated as much, so if you think you are going to say OMG RACISSS EUGENICIST and I am going to, what?  I'm gonna fuckin deny it when I JUST SUGGESTED IT?

     

    Does it occur to you that east asians have the HIGHEST average score on these exams?  WTF, reality shits on you again.  I am not east asian, btw.  But it doesn't matter, as a general case does not speak to a specific one. 

     

    Besides, the low IQ races underperform in every test of cognition, not just SB.  Pick a test.  The reality of subsaharan Africa is that intelligence there is exceptionally low, which is why people walk miles for water instead of building pipes and why it has no history of even the indigenous written word.

     

    My race or sex has nothing to do with me; I am an individual.  It is a matter of fact that whites and males have substantially higher sigmas to their IQ distributions than other groups...so what?  You may be a white male and you are still an idiot.  Being a white male doesn't endow you with the genius IQ of other white males by the virtue of the irrelevant color of your skin.  That skin covers an idiot.

     

    NO race norming would be performed for a reproduction threshold; the tests are race-blind.  The reason africans average lower scores is because africans have lower average cognitive capacity.  This is just simply the way it is.

     

    Math and abstract reasoning are not racist, you sniveling idiot, and IQ tests are not crafted to reflect memorization.  JFC, they give these tests the world over.  Do the world a favor and attempt to become educated.

     

    For you to claim that there is a "white" and "european" intelligence is utterly absurd.

     

    reply flag as junk (0) 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Sun, 03/06/2011 - 22:25

    #1024972

     

    the vast majority of people cannot understand geometric compounding.

     

    So maybe we need to set the bar at 140; whatever.

     

    The population needs to decrease and get smarter.  If at that point, we have to craft a BNW type outcome, fine.

     

    Grow OR die leads to death because growth CANNOT continue forever.  I am a bacteria at 10 minutes to midnight sounding an alarm.

     

    link: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/guest-post-there-are-no-good-outcomes

     

    ___

     

    Now, he brings up the fact that blacks have low IQs.  Funny, considering that was the explicit distinction he picked for forced sterilization.

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Thu, 12/30/2010 - 23:52

    #839016

     

    YES, some races are BETTER than others, if you want advanced medicine, electricity, the written word, the computer, the lightbulb and all the rest of that shit.

     

    WTF is wrong with you people?  Especially that uncle tom apologist with his "RACISSSSS" epithet in the previous post?  I mean what.tha.fuck??

     

    Look at HISTORY.  Which race is it that the people who invented EVERYTHING AROUND YOU came from?  And in the sickest of ironies, people from that race actually feel GUILT over the fact that it wasn't brown people who did everything!

     

    They welcome multiculturalism...wtf?  ALL cultures are NOT EQUAL.  I don't LIKE cultures of destruction and misery, of primitivity, like all throughout the brown world.  I don't WANT the ghetto culture of murder and criminality.  I don't WANT african culture that didn't possess the written word until it was oppressed by white people with it or the native american culture that ALSO lacked the written word and the fucking wheel.

     

    WTF is the matter with people these days that they think all cultures are equivalent?  Multiculturalism is a SICK JOKE and a crime against human progress.

     

    The more mexicans we get, the more we are like mexico.  The more the diversity, the lower the average IQ.  DO THE MATH, shit just keeps getting worse.  Diversity is a FRAUD and pretending that all races are equal is a crime.  For example, we continuously hear how bad the US is globally in terms of aptitude tests, but if you examine AT ALL the demographics breakdowns, you see that the bad aggregate score we have as a nation is ENTIRELY DUE to hispanics and blacks!  Yet NOBODY can mention these "hate facts" without having a white uncle tom condemn him as a RACIST.

     

    People who refuse to accept reality as it IS are suicidal fools.

     

     

     

     

     

    Thu, 12/30/2010 - 22:44 | trav7777 (Total Score:1)

     

    AWSUMZ...I mean taking philosophy and guidance from a fucking wal mart cashier.

     

    I truly WANT genes in my bloodline with average IQs of 85, I mean who wouldn't?

     

    99/100 would choose to have sex, wtf?  And get knocked up by some ghetto thug who will end up in prison and pass on his criminal and idiot genes to the little mulatto offspring who then grow up with a trash mom and no dad?  Sounds like a recipe for technological progress to me, right?  I mean, think of ALL THE INVENTIONS by the brown people over the centuries...all one of them.

     

    WOW...great advice wal mart.  99/100 would choose to doom their kids because they are incapable of constraining their sexual urges; what a fucking catastrophe.  Bunch of freakin whores.  When they can't throw on a pantsuit and go sit behind a desk and pretend to work but still get paid, more selectivity will be employed in mating patterns.

     

    Login or register to post comments

     

    link: http://188.126.66.67/article/guest-post-if-we-close-our-eyes-monster-wil...

     

    ___

     

    More racism: 

     

     

     

    by trav7777 

    on Wed, 03/02/2011 - 14:09

    #1012036

     

    huh?  Average brain size of blacks IS smaller.

     

    This is what we call a "hate fact."

     

    Oh and while I'm up, STFU you uncle tom racebaiting fuckstick

     

    reply flag as junk (3) 

     

     

    link:http://www.zerohedge.com/article/and-defense-secretary-gates-just-uttere...

     

    ___

     

    So, basically, this sociopath's whole thesis is "kill the darkies, and anyone I don't like because anyone who disagrees with me is clearly stupid".  He wants to sterilize/murder between 50 and 97% of the population, with the explicit goal of exterminating all blacks.  

     

    Can anyone really take this guy seriously with all the shit he has posted?  All he is doing is presenting a one sided argument to try to stir up sentiment in his favor so he can exterminate a bunch of people.  Basically, the guy is a petite Hitler, a fucking monster, waiting for an audience.

     So now the mystery as to why this guy so aggressively attacks anyone who denies peak oil, or indeed any of the garbage he spouts, is attacked VICIOUSLY, and without relent.  He will say literally ANYTHING, whether slight fudging of the truth, a half truth, outright lie that seems plausible, or a lie completely out of left field.  I have never seen such a dark purpose behind a series of posts, and the fact that these posts have been made over the course of more than a year is absolutely CHILLING.  This guy is a mass murderer looking for a victim.

    And Trav, so you know, I will post this response to every post I see from you from now on.  You're fucking dead to me, save for this post.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 23:30 | 1318766 trav7777
    trav7777's picture

    let me say this again, in a manner so blunt that even an idiot like YOU can get it:  EROI has NOTHING whatsoever to do with economics.

    It is STRICTLY a measure of energy returned on a process that has energy as an input.  It is a measure of exothermicity.

    Whatever your idiotic ass means about "it is not a set value,"...wtf does that mean?  WTF do you mean it is not a set fucking value?  Every process has a different EROI.

    Now, kindly STFU and get back to your 12-step

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 00:47 | 1318861 tmosley
    tmosley's picture

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_(mathematics)

    Sorry, no mass sterilization on my watch, you fucking sociopathic bitch.

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 06:09 | 1319037 buzzard
    buzzard's picture

    The point isn't whether it is economically viable or not. It needs to have a positive Energy Return On Energy Invested. Physics trumps economics every time.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:29 | 1317694 Gold Man-Sacks
    Gold Man-Sacks's picture

    Ethanol is for all the hypocritical greenies who want to consume to their hearts' content while feeling like they're saving the planet. 

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:13 | 1318047 Bicycle Repairman
    Bicycle Repairman's picture

    The ethanol 'thing' works like this.  Right now we feed corn to livestock.  It is not good for them.  It causes gastro-intestinal disorders and physical pain.   What to do?  Take the ethanol out and the remainder is healthy livestock feed.  But what will we do with that ethanol?  Hmmmm.....

    Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:33 | 1319261 DaveyJones
    DaveyJones's picture

    Myth 2: Food-based biofuels can replace a meaningful proportion of the world's fossil fuel supply.

    Reality: Nothing could be further from the truth. Consider that the total world supply of edible oils is currently at 125 million metric tons. World crude oil production is more than 10,000 mmt. Even if we could convert 20% of our current edible oil supply to fuel with no conversion losses, it would replace only 0.25% of current crude oil production.

    Food-based ethanol requires significant amounts of fossil energy for its production (see Myth 1). If we were to convert 20% of the world's 2007 grain crop to ethanol, it would produce about 138 million tons of ethanol. That 138 million tons would represent a net gain of only 45 million tons of energy due to the fossil fuels burned to produce the ethanol. Those 45 million tons are only 0.45% of the world's crude oil production and would supply an even smaller percentage of total world energy consumption.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:17 | 1317321 citta vritti
    citta vritti's picture

    who needs oil when we’ve got Greece?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:20 | 1317323 LawsofPhysics
    LawsofPhysics's picture

    "The only thing that could prevent another oil shock from happening before the end of 2012 would be another major economic contraction. "

    It is on its way, no need to read further.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:53 | 1317506 Mr Lennon Hendrix
    Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

    The only thing that could prevent another oil shock from happening before the end of 2012 would be another major economic contraction.

    This is a false assumption.  When the economy contracts, so does investment.  When investment contracts, then oil stays offline.  This means the peak comes sooner.  If it is put online before the peak, then maybe it mitigates it, but if it goes online post peak, then it matters not.

    I think the reason...the main reason that Paulson and Co. crashed the economy in the Fall of '08 was because they wanted to get one last push on beginning the New World Order before peak oil hit.We are so close to peak oil now, they will not try again.  There will be no more deflation before hyperinflation, only stagflation.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:25 | 1317656 aquagreen73s
    aquagreen73s's picture

    Spot on Mr. Johnnie/Jimmie. Spot on.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:45 | 1317750 aerojet
    aerojet's picture

    You really think they engineered the breakdown?  I wholeheartedly disagree.  Lehman and Bear collapsed because of derivatives and RE.  It was wild speculation, an attempt to shore up someone's balance sheet, that ran crude so high in 2008, not demand. 

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:10 | 1318036 Mr Lennon Hendrix
    Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

    I agree that the economy was going to collapse, but it was set up to do so long ago with NAFTA, derivatives, the tech bubble, the housing bubble, etc.  Paulson and Co. wanted it to collapse right before oil production peaked so they could pick the pieces up cheap one last time.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:27 | 1317683 LawsofPhysics
    LawsofPhysics's picture

    Sorry, I forgot my < sarc > flags.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:22 | 1317334 Stu
    Stu's picture

    debt is a substitute for the gaping void created by declining EREOI

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:06 | 1317831 CrashisOptimistic
    CrashisOptimistic's picture

    >>

    debt is a substitute for the gaping void created by declining EREOI

    >>

    In a very broad minded, non specific, offensively non detailed way . . . you're right.  Oil is the fuel of civilization and it's getting scarce and the party is now over.

    The Party's Over and the cops are coming.  On horseback.  Four of them.

    That will prove to be the only valuable text I've ever invented.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:20 | 1317336 Coast Watcher
    Coast Watcher's picture

    I share the skepticism about the mysterious upward revisions that IEA tacked onto its 2010 numbers. So far I haven't seen much in the way of a credible explanation of where the extra barrels came from. Given the way all statistics are being manipulated these days (BLS, anyone?), it's difficult to know what numbers are real anymore.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:54 | 1317515 CrashisOptimistic
    CrashisOptimistic's picture

    The revisions were in the EIA data, not IEA.  Easy error to make.

    Sort of like the Saudis pumping 8+ mbpd, which is 3+ BILLION barrels per year, but each year they declare their reserves to be constant, and have done so for about what, 15 yrs now?

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 16:40 | 1318103 Coast Watcher
    Coast Watcher's picture

    Yes, thanks for the correction. Fumble finger moment. And true that about reserves never changing despite constant pumping. Same holds true for most of the OPEC nations.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:21 | 1317337 samsara
    samsara's picture

    "...Below a certain level, it means no growth at all. "

     

    THANK YOU TYLER !!!

    Peak Oil = End Of Growth

    Period.

    As DeRonin(poster on another board) has as a byline.

    Our pending energy supply contraction = no economic growth = insufficient debt service = chaos + oilwars.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:24 | 1317361 Stu
    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 14:29 | 1317692 espirit
    espirit's picture

    Actually, the U.S. will probably be going to Venezuela in the near future.

    Only natural the oligarchs already have this one figured.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 15:07 | 1317836 CrashisOptimistic
    CrashisOptimistic's picture

    Yup.  There will be a lot of civilians in Venezuela that need protecting soon, too.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:24 | 1317344 kito
    kito's picture

    peak oil and global warming, neither happening.

    Fri, 05/27/2011 - 13:28 | 1317366 Spastica Rex
    Spastica Rex's picture

    Buckminster Fuller agreed with you. See "Ephemeralization." Also see "Dymaxion Car."

    Love Bucky.

    He was CRAZY.

    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!