Guest Post: Pocket-Change SEC Fines: Barely A Bark And No Bite

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Nomi Prins

Pocket-Change SEC Fines: Barely a Bark and No Bite

There's a reason yesterday's
announcement that JPM Chase would 'settle' for a fine of $156.3 million,
while neither admitting nor denying any wrong-doing, thereby forking
over the whopping equivalent of a normal person's weekly grocery budget,
pisses people off. Because it's a marginal fleabite on the teflon hand
of the nation's second largest bank in terms of punitive pain, and
absolutely meaningless in altering the grand scheme of toxic securities
creation or  complex financial institution business as usual. 

The trivial settlement appears even
tinier in comparison to the financial aid JPM Chase received in the wake
of its financial crisis. Despite all of CEO Jamie Dimon's disingenuous,
though fervently delivered, remarks to the contrary (he didn't need a
bailout, he took it for the 'team' to ensure no bank would be singled
out to sport a scarlet 'B' of bailout shame), JPM Chase at one point,
during the height of the bank's federal subsidization program, floated
on nearly $100 BILLION dollars worth
of - exceptional assistance. That figure included: $25 billion from the
TARP fund, which has since been repaid, $40.5 billion dollars of new
debt backed by the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP),
which has since been retired, about $6 billion through various aspects
of the TARP HAMP program which aided a fraction of underwater borrowers,
and $28.8 billion behind its Fed-backed, Treasury-pushed acquisition of
Bear Stearns, which is still in place. That's aside from its government
aided acquisition of Washington Mutual.

There are those that believe that the
bailout program (which they continue to equate to just the $700 billion
TARP program) was a success (like the Fed, Treasury Department, any
Administration, and Andrew Ross Sorkin).

Yet, subsidizing Wall Street's most
powerful creatures, altered nothing for the banks that survived, while
promulgating ongoing economic pain for the general population caught in
the wake of a $14 trillion dollar asset creation machine, which became a
globally leveraged $140 trillion still-decaying mess, spurred by
rapacious speculation, that sat on just $1.4 trillion of sub-prime loans
and various other properties. 

Banks want us to believe that widespread
economic pain has nothing to do with them, that they were innocent
participants. Maybe they made a few mistakes - for which they're paying
SEC directed fines, but hey, we all do.

Meanwhile, the budget bantering that
drones on in Washington keeps missing the fact that part of the bank
subsidization process remains on the Fed's books. This includes $1.6
trillion dollars in EXCESS bank reserves - i.e. reserves for which the
Fed is paying banks 0.25% to NOT lend, about $900 billion worth of
mortgage-backed securities, and $1.5 trillion worth of Treasuries,
partly from the QE2 program. That's an awful lot of captive
non-stimulus. It sure isn't helping drive job creation or small business
expansion sitting there.

Of course, this latest SEC settlement is
not the first non-punishment for a bank's role in producing or
promoting a leveraged mountain of faulty assets. The hush money action
is part of a now-two-year SEC program to address, in the commission's
own words, 'misconduct that led to or arose from the financial crisis.'

Leaving aside, the tepid
characterization 'misconduct' instead of say 'racketeering', these fines
don't, and won't, change the banking system. And nowhere does this
fining regulatory body suggest a way to do so. It would be refreshing
for the SEC, founded in conjunction with the Glass-Steagall Act that
separated banks into institutions that dealt with the public's deposit
and financing needs from those that created and traded speculative
securities for private profit purposes, to suggest a modern equivalent
of that act. It might help the commission do its job of protecting the
public before unnecessary devastation, not years afterwards, or
at the very least, untangle the web of layered borrowing and debt
manufacturing at the core of these complex giants.

But, that's not going to happen. Not as
long as small fines, absent any form of attached probation, stringent
monitoring, or cease-and-desist requirements, can slowly make the issue
go away. Seriously, it takes longer to argue a traffic ticket than it
took Goldman Sachs to 'agree' to a $550 million settlement on July 15,
2010, after the SEC charged the firm with defrauding investors only
three months earlier. People caught with minor amounts of crack or pot
undergo stricter plea processes, probationary measures and detainments. 

To date, the SEC has charged four firms
with CDO related fraud, including Wachovia, Goldman Sachs, and JPM
Chase, who settled for $11 million, $550 million and $156 million
respectively. A case against ICP Asset management remains open. 

The commission has charged five firms
with making misleading disclosures to investors about mortgage-related
risks, including American Home Mortgage, whose former CEO settled for a
paltry $2.45 million fine and a 5-year officer and director bar,
Citigroup, that settled for a $75 million penalty, Bank of America's
Countrywide, whose former CEO, Angelo Mozilo agreed to a $22.5 million
penalty and a permanent officer and director bar (a fraction of his
pre-crisis take), and New Century, whose executives paid $1.5 million
and agreed to a five-year bar. There is an ongoing case against IndyMac
Bancorp.

In addition, the SEC charged six firms
with concealing the extent of risky mortgage-related assets in mutual
and other similar funds. Those included Charles Schwab that settled for a
$118 million fine, Evergreen that settled for $40 million to mostly
repay investors, TD Ameritrade that settled for $10 million, and State
Street that settled to repay investors $300 million.

Separately, Bank of America agreed to a
$150 million settlement for misleading its investors about bonuses paid
to Merrill Lynch and not disclosing Merrill Lynch's mounting losses.
This didn't stop the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department from
remaining steadfastly behind the Bank of America/Merrill Lynch
make-a-too-big-to-fail-bank-bigger merger, upon which the settlement was
based.

In total, the SEC, mildly policing the
vast financial system that pushed a criminal musical chairs game of
last-one-holding-a-toxic-asset-or-underwater-mortgage-loses, charged 66
entities and individuals with 'misconduct', imposed 19 officer or
director bars, and levied $1.5 billion of penalties, disgorgement, and
other monetary relief fines. Put that in perspective, say, with the $28 billion in bonuses that JPM scooped up for just 2010, or the $424 billion in total bonuses the top six banks bagged between the crisis book-end years of 2007-2009, or the $128 billion
of bonuses Wall Street got last year. Now, consider that not only is
the penalty amount a pittance, but the impact of these fines, is even
smaller. And, that's the bigger problem with fines, particularly tiny
ones. They offer this illusion of a fix that leaves us worse off from a
stability perspective than we were before.