This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: Thinking Outside the Bubble: A Pairs Trade On The EU Experiment

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by JM

Thinking Outside the Bubble: A Pairs Trade on the EU Experiment (pdf)

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 09/10/2010 - 20:59 | 575352 bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Someone in the EU is throwing the pennies in front of the steamroller.

Well its easier to catch falling knives with a flattened set of fingers!

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 21:17 | 575364 putbuyer
putbuyer's picture
EXCLUSIVE: Outlook Gloomy at Secret Billionaire Meeting

http://www.cnbc.com/id/39097299

 

And 4 you catch the man

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPpUFBVSyWs

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 21:19 | 575366 ??
??'s picture

?

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 22:37 | 575445 AUD
AUD's picture

Garbage, the only reason Treasuries are 'liquid' is because central banks buy them outright or loan against them.

One day people will realise that the dollar, euro, pound etc is just the 'more marketable' form of the treasury bond, bill, note. Which is to say it is the same thing.

'Selling' your bond for a 'profit' means you are rolling over the obligation of the government.

One day.....

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 07:25 | 575606 jm
jm's picture

Hey.  At least I agree with your understanding of the bond/currency relation.  Currency is a bearer bond that pays no interest.  In the past it has been redeemable for a fixed ammout of metal and such.  Now the decision as to what it is redeemable for is market-based.

The only way I can understand why the things people hate- Treasuries- are so desired is because the liquidity of the market makes them the only cash market where you can drop and pull effectively unlimited amounts of capital with vritually no transactions cost.  And the intrest rate reduces carry. I'll say it again... nobody thinks Treasuries have Fort Knox fundamentals.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 09:27 | 575639 hugolp
hugolp's picture

He is saying exaclty the same.

Treasuries are not a flight to quality at all. But when debt reduction is the prevailing wind, what really matters is liquidity. 

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 22:49 | 575456 prophet
prophet's picture

Not to mention that in a margin account treasuries give you the maximum buying power of any security.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 07:08 | 575607 jm
jm's picture

Just to clarify...

Gov securities take the least (or no) haircut while say HY paper has taken up to a 40% haircut. If you want to buy cheap risk on margin, this makes Treasuries beautiful creatures, yes?

 

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 07:24 | 575612 AUD
AUD's picture

What does it matter? When you sell you get given the bond straight back since the dollar is the obligation of the issuer, being the 'more marketable' form of the bond.

One day....probably won't be Monday.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 07:38 | 575615 jm
jm's picture

It matters because people want them.  This is classic don't fight the tape.  One day they may make dollar redeemable for a fixed amount of metal or such again.

Credit money (is that the right name?) means labor markets don't have bear the brunt of adjustment.  It makes financing cheaper so that technological advance makes good phase transitions to better living.  Insufficient controls made leverage system threatening.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 19:33 | 576137 Andy
Andy's picture

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

Sun, 09/12/2010 - 07:18 | 576666 jm
jm's picture

This is denial of reality.  Look at what the long bond did in late 2008 and early 2009.  Then look at t-bills... the interest rate was negative for a time.

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 23:36 | 575481 Pillage
Pillage's picture

Hey Tyler, time for an article on China raising rates after CPI hit 3.5%?

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 23:51 | 575495 Oracle of Kypseli
Oracle of Kypseli's picture

"Long Greek short German". What if Greece defaults and rolls in the drachma? how big of a loss would that be?

"Bureaucrats with a deep line of taxpayer's credit to distort reality" 

I just have to say: What a line! 

 

Greek civil servants are now the masters of the private sector as they make more money and have more benefits while producing nothing. Something has got to give.

Why is it that in most governments public employees can not be fired? the answer is simple, long time ago when you could fire them, every time the government changed, almost everyone was fired only to be replaced by the new government friends and relatives.

At some point, parliamentary members or other officials decided that it was in the interest of both parties (two major ones) that rather than total replacement to just keep adding and adding and only replace key high positions.

However, the early days, salaries for government workers were very low and only the meek and poor in spirit wanted them. As the years went by and they unionized, the demands for support of re-election came at a price. (Higher salaries and more benefits) on and on to today's reality.

Government workers, work less, make more, have more benefits and the system is at its elastic yield point at which plastic deformation occurs and the process is irreversible. Something has got to give.    

Love ZH and most ZHedgers

   

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 23:57 | 575497 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

Greek civil servants are now the masters of the private sector as they make more money and have more benefits while producing nothing

US civil servants are now the masters of the private sector as they make more money and have more benefits while producing nothing.

There, I fixed it for you...

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 01:43 | 575548 Oracle of Kypseli
Oracle of Kypseli's picture

Indeed. My last paragraph was meant to imply that the same applies universally including the US. But I guess it is not clear enough.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 03:54 | 575576 edotabin
edotabin's picture

Unless you had lived through the transformation of the Greek culture since the early 80's, it is hard to explain how much damage has been done. Most Americans want to work. They can't find a job but that doesn't negate the fact that they still want to work. On the other hand, about 2 generations of Greeks have been completely destroyed. It is a truly sad situation.

Fri, 09/10/2010 - 23:58 | 575499 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

What if Greece defaults and rolls in the drachma? how big of a loss would that be?

EPIC FAIL

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 15:51 | 575876 Azannoth
Azannoth's picture

When the dominos start to roll it will be everybody for him self

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 00:00 | 575500 goldsaver
goldsaver's picture

*

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 08:15 | 575621 Which is worse ...
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists's picture

Government workers, work less, make more, have more benefits and the system is at its elastic yield point at which plastic deformation occurs and the process is irreversible. Something has got to give.  

 

Not true when the government is no longer controlled by the people. 

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 15:54 | 575881 Azannoth
Azannoth's picture

Can you name 1 Government in modern history(since Julius Cesar) that was controlled by the people ? And even if 'people' could control the government I am not sure I would want that either

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 06:38 | 575603 MrTrader
MrTrader's picture

Note on Monday : long 10 year Greek bonds, short 10 year German government bonds. For the fun of it let´s say long SIN: GR0124028623 and short ISIN:DE0001135291.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 07:21 | 575611 jm
jm's picture

Here's more financial Sudoku.  You have to hedge SEK/EUR for it.

Sweden doesn't play games with banks... they nationalize 'em if it all goes down.  Buy Swede bond spot forwards.  Germany will instead play the zombie love game with their banks.  Sell bund through futures.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 08:19 | 575623 tom
tom's picture

Good piece, especially these two points:

"Treasuries are not a flight to quality at all. But when debt reduction is the prevailing wind, what really matters is liquidity." 

Short-term Treasuries are practically cash equivalents. For the marginal buyers, medium- and longer-term Treasuries are short-term bets (<6 months) on no recovery and QE, and if that doesn't work out they can be sold quicker at less loss than other kinds of debt.

"Liquidity policies are designed to obscure insolvency and illiquidity."

This is a similar point to the one I'm making talking about delayed deleveraging and the latent debt burden. The weight of >200% of GDP in private sector debt is being held off the economy's shoulders by near-zero rates. To recover, the economy doesn't just need to get through the debts that are so bad they can't be refinanced even in optimal liquidity conditions, it needs to strengthen enough to be able to bear the weight of the latent debt burden as rates rise. We needed more deleveraging in 2008-2009 than we got, and so we're stuck in this mud.

http://keynesianfailure.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/delayed-deleveraging-meets-the-keynesian-endpoint/

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 15:01 | 575810 jm
jm's picture

Tom:

I read your blogpost.  I agree that we are pretty much at the endgame of wealth redistribution through fiscal and montary policies (your Keynesianism). As much as I hate what Chimerica is doing, it is largely a symptom, not the problem.  You nailed the problem:  private sector debt reduction.  The game will not last, but Mother Nature has its own cures: time and shared sacrifice.

I'm not convinced that this implies a deflationary dollar collapse nor a hyperinflationary debt jubilee in "core" nations.  The periphery is toast.

 

 

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 20:48 | 576252 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

jm-

"The periphery is toast."

any new information in that assessment?

TPMB been trying to make it better, (well, advise ptb to help in that direction) but, well, ... not so much.

maybe DDT would keep more alive, maybe certain practices ... ?

- Ned

 

 

Sun, 09/12/2010 - 07:32 | 576672 jm
jm's picture

By "periphery" I mean countries that must absorb a disproportionate amount of sacrifice vis-a-vis their creditors.

It is frankly not Greece's choice whether they stay in the EU or otherwise.  Once the dust settles with respect continental money center banks, Greece will face their future. 

This is just an example, and I believe in decoupling to some extent.  Just as some people emerge from recessions much wealthier and some emerge much poorer, so it is with nations.   

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 21:03 | 576280 tom a taxpayer
tom a taxpayer's picture

Tom - I read your blog post. Great insights. In the conclusion, the blog says:

"At that point, the Fed could choose to increase QE and also monetize the rolling-over of maturing federal debt, which would spur hyperinflation and fiscal collapse. Or, the Fed could call off QE, forcing the government to default and sharply cut spending."

If the government is forced to default, what would it default on? Can you give some examples? And in anticipation of government default, are there any investments to ride out the storm?

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 09:25 | 575637 hugolp
hugolp's picture

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant.

I dont know if many people will read the whole thing but its one of the best I have read here.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 11:30 | 575689 jm
jm's picture

Wow.  I owe you a bong hit.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 13:14 | 575737 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Here's how smart the Fed is.  The rest of the article is well worth a read.

Several years ago when he was still Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Alan Greenspan publically puzzled over the “conundrum” that was the US Treasury bond market. While the Fed raised short-term rates from their low of 1% as the economy recovered following the tech bust, long-term rates stayed relatively low. Even as the stock market and the housing market continued their rise, yields on long-term Treasury bonds fell below short-term rates in 2006 —a yield curve ”inversion” that foreshadowed the recession that began in late 2007.
Although many have looked at the specific reasons why rates on long-term Treasury bonds remained relatively low (trade deficits, the “global savings glut,” etc.), with hindsight it is clear that the bond market was pricing in an extended period ahead of low inflation. Now that we have been through the bust of the housing and credit markets, we can see that the bond market was correct in anticipating a recession and a low inflation environment. In fact, there was no “conundrum”—only a market forecast that didn’t fit the Fed’s expectations.

http://www.sitkapacific.com/files/Sitka_Pacific_Capital_Management_July_...

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 13:57 | 575770 Dismal Scientist
Dismal Scientist's picture

Sadly though, the Fed has the biggest guns and all the liquidity bullets. How smart they are (or not) has become irrelevant. I will refrain from posting Arnie and his mini gun again to visualise the statement, but here's another classic that occurred to me...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDLQg8ZKBS8

1:09 into the clip.

Sat, 09/11/2010 - 16:50 | 575937 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

I highly recommend the Sitka Capital newsletters.   They are chock full of good stuff.

You can subscribe for free and they come out every month or two.

Sun, 09/12/2010 - 15:25 | 577037 Gromit
Gromit's picture

Thank you for the brilliant analysis that US Treasuries are a flight to liquidity rather than to quality.

I've been wondering for a while about money market funds - it's hard to stop brokers investing idle cash in them - but really they represent the worst of all possible investments. Zero yield plus potential illiquidity in a market meltdown.

Maybe I'll hold idle cash in T Bond ETFs from now on!

 

Sun, 09/12/2010 - 16:04 | 577073 jm
jm's picture

As it is, I suspect the bond bubble is nothing more than retail taking greater term risk and credit risk because money market returns are so low.  MMMFs returns will stay low because banks are pouring idle cash in money markets (in addition to reserves).

I did some market intel when there was talk of the Fed not paying interest on reserves.  If that did happen, high likelihood tier 1 banks would pour so much money in MMMFs that the return would become even more of a joke.

Ultimately ZIRP will thin out MMMFs.  This creates its own problems via roll risk.

 

 

Sun, 09/12/2010 - 19:05 | 577274 Gromit
Gromit's picture

Roll risk indeed!

There's nowhere else to put the crap they stuff into broker's money market funds.

So, friends, don't be lazy, fight the inertia, don't be stuck in money market funds when the music stops.

Mon, 09/13/2010 - 11:36 | 578439 Grand Supercycle
Grand Supercycle's picture

Updated DOW weekly chart:

http://stockmarket618.wordpress.com

Tue, 09/28/2010 - 02:59 | 609294 Herry12
Herry12's picture

Thank u, i found this for a long time.
cheap site hosting | windows web hosting | windows vps hosting

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!