This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: The US Economy Is Extremely Vulnerable To Recession in 2011

Tyler Durden's picture





 

From Toni Pallotta Of Macro Story

The US Economy Is Extremely Vulnerable To Recession in 2011

"Everything should be made as simple as possible..." - Albert Einstein

You don't need a degree in macro economics to understand an economy. Just because an economy is complex, the analysis need not be. I've been studying the change in GDP from Q4 2010 to Q1 2011 to get a sense of where the economy is regarding contraction or expansion. I have a sense the economy stands today where it stood in December 2007 the very month the great recession began.

I've shared various technical charts showing striking similarities with the 10 year treasury market and equity markets comparing the price action between May 2011 to present and October 2007 through December. The big component though was the macro picture. You could easily argue it is far closer to recession now than it was in 2007 when Q4 07 GDP was 2.9% only to print (.72)% the very next quarter. With Q1 2011 GDP at 1.9% the margin for error is far less than in 07.  But that is not enough to base an investment decision upon.

2007: Imagine in December 2007 asking the question if Q1 2008 would contract. It would be hard to say yes as a 2.9% print is pretty solid. That is until the consumer rolled over. 

2011: Few if any economists are calling for recession in 2011 but why? One can argue making that call today is far easier than December 2007. Look at the fall off in consumer from Q4 to Q1. Many would argue it did fall but still well above contraction. Additionally the investment component showed a strong resurgence in Q1.

 

So is the US economy vulnerable to recession as early as Q2 of this year? July's drop in the  University Of Michigan Sentiment would say yes.

In comparing University Of Michigan Sentiment readings with various components of GDP I was amazed at how well it tracks both the Total Consumer component (goods and services) and the Fixed Investment component.

Consumer: The charts would say the consumer is ready to contract, possibly as low as (1.0)%


Fixed Investment: The charts would say the Fixed Investment component also is set for some serious contraction.


The remaining components Net Foreign Trade and Inventory seem to offset one another over time as shown below (they oscillate for the most part between plus or minus 1%).  What has been trending lower though is the Government portion. The question then becomes when the next recession comes just how able is the government to stimulus spend. We know they will try but at what point will the bond market even in the face of Fed printing limit their ability? 


Apparently the US economy never watched the movie Field Of Dreams.  For they have in fact built it but based on consumer sentiment, they have also failed to come.

 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 07/17/2011 - 10:51 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

No offense intended, but I don't need those charts to buy into the idea that there might be a recession. Try depression. This is missing the forest because you are focused on some leaves. Dude the Forest is on fire!!! The leaves look kinda smoky for a reason. AHHHHH!!!! Run away, run away!!

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:07 | Link to Comment Bang Dae Ho
Bang Dae Ho's picture

I know, I know, I would like to run, but where to?

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:58 | Link to Comment CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

I chose Alaska ... J. Tainter lives in Utah now, so that might be another good option (he is no dummy!) ... just sayin' ...

Regards,

Cooter

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 14:28 | Link to Comment Ahmeexnal
Ahmeexnal's picture

In Cuba, you need a permit to do most about everything.

Welcome to Marxist America:

http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/georgia-police-shut-down-lemonade...!F530F842-2057-4315-A47E-157EAB89B8E3

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:45 | Link to Comment Tuco Benedicto ...
Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez's picture

Unfortunately, besides Japan, Alaska is now about the worst place in the world to be in order to avoid radiation.

 

Tuco

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:37 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

@MsC

+1  Why are we even debating a recession?  It's a depression.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:20 | Link to Comment Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Zigackly! My first thought as well. SInce 2008 to boot.

Whut a yoke.

Yesterday was an important anniversary by the way, still good to pay heed!

ORI

http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/66th-anniversary-of-trinity-and-thoughts/

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:11 | Link to Comment Pure Evil
Pure Evil's picture

It's good to know that the mainstream sentiment is finally catching up reality.

To quote Einstein, the simple truth is such:

If the government, ie. the FED and the Treasury, have to prop up the economy through quantitative easing for 3+ years, then you're smack dead in the throes of a depression.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:55 | Link to Comment PY-129-20
PY-129-20's picture

3 years of quantitative easing, trillions of Dollars spent, and all you got was a lousy pink slip.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 13:45 | Link to Comment Popo
Popo's picture

We're only *not* in a recession because we're spending like drunken sailors on the Government credit card.  

We're basically running electricity through a corpse to make it wriggle,  and warning that the corpse has a high possibility of passing away in the coming months.

It's idiocy.   The economy is dead without stimulus.   ie:  The economy is dead.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 10:54 | Link to Comment Coke and Hookers
Coke and Hookers's picture

Is it possible to subtract all the printed and borrowed-from-abroad money dumped into the economy from the GDP for the last 10 years or so to see how much the negative growth is? ;-)

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:40 | Link to Comment Tuco Benedicto ...
Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez's picture

I am sure it is but we will have to do it ourselves!  Now "that" would be an article!

 

Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 16:40 | Link to Comment malek
Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:03 | Link to Comment espirit
espirit's picture

2011: Few if any economists are calling for recession in 2011 but why?

Perhaps it is the transitory nature of the definition.  The baseline measurement (standard) eventually changes.

I'll need more pixie dust and kool-aid to believe "everything" is getting better, and that debt default (reduction, write-off, foregiveness, et al) including repatriation of profits from multinationals at reduced income tax rates - are not the ultimate goals of the Republicrats.

Bring it on.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:42 | Link to Comment espirit
espirit's picture

Cash without trash, bitchez.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:14 | Link to Comment Apply Force
Apply Force's picture

"What has been trending lower though is the Government portion. The question then becomes when the next recession comes just how able is the government to stimulus spend. We know they will try but at what point will the bond market even in the face of Fed printing limit their ability?..." 

The government will spend through the people - more checks will go out.  Stagflation for more and more... and timing is everything, especially trying to escape a dying but for-now-tradable currency.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:19 | Link to Comment RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

Virtually every Wall Street "expert" is predicting a depression and more pain for the consumer.

The XRT is saying otherwise.  In fact, the XRT is forecasting a consumer spending boom of unparalleled proportions in 2012 - 2013.

Recessions do not last forever.

In fact, this recession is not nearly as bad as the 1990 - 1991 recession in California.  I knew lots of aerospace engineers and bankers who were driving cabs, or working construction for $15/hr. back then.  Real estate transactions completely collapsed.  I remember the house across the street from me, brand new custom home, was sitting for sale for 2 1/2 years.

Well, the economy came back with a vengeance.

And after the "bond scare" of 1994 when interest rates went up to the moon and everyone was predicting an economic collapse, the stock market commenced the greatest rally of all time.  That was exactly 4 years after 1990.

If you don't believe me, see for yourself:

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&symb=SPx&...

The $SPX rallied from 450 to 1200.

And we are now 3 years out since the 2008 meltdown, and everyone is predicting gloom.

Things are never as bad as the media hypes it up to me.

For example, "Carmaggeddon" was a no-show here in Los Angeles.  There is virtually no one out on the freeways this weekend.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:21 | Link to Comment markar
markar's picture

At least when you post idiocy, keep it short.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:32 | Link to Comment mt paul
mt paul's picture

no one

could afford gas

to drive any where...

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:26 | Link to Comment moonstears
moonstears's picture

@ mt paul....you made me laugh...simple truths are humorous!

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:34 | Link to Comment espirit
espirit's picture

"In fact, the XRT is forecasting a consumer spending boom of unparalleled proportions in 2012 - 2013."

Roblot- What you fail to understand is that we do not make it here in the US anymore, unless you count "Double Quarter Pounders w/ Cheese."

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:39 | Link to Comment QQQBall
QQQBall's picture

And did the market come back b/c the gov't bought bad paper at 100 cents on the dollar? Did they pay people's mortgages? The RTC was was swift and brutal and that is why the market came back; because prices reached a clearing level and provided good risk-adjusted yields. The bigger the bubble, the bigger the pop.  

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:55 | Link to Comment Nostradumbass
Nostradumbass's picture

*

"Carmaggeddon" was a no-show here in Los Angeles.  There is virtually no one out on the freeways this weekend."

 

Gee, do you suppose the non-stop media blitz- including billboards, radio and teevee before this weekend and during the work could have had anything to do with people in cars not going out on freeways? Hmmm?

The Coast-To-Coast program on 640 KKKFI was preempted two hours on Friday to keep the endless "news" about carmageddon going until zero hour... I nearly went into convulsions not having my pre-bedtime fix of UFO's, Aliens, 2012 Catastrophe and other such info. to guide me into peaceful psychedellic slumber...

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 14:52 | Link to Comment Tater Salad
Tater Salad's picture

Robot, I agree with some of your assessment however, I think the point is that we may enter a "new" [re-de]pression.  Technically, government led or not, we've been out of depression as GDP has been positivesince the middle of '09.  I think the realization is now that we truly have a crisis in confidence (as we should with this administration), a severly wounded consumer and a secular shift in consumption behavior.  All of this not to mention the greatest deleveraging cycle the globe has ever experienced and that has in fact just begun. 

Truly, we've not been to this party before.  I might go out on a limb and say this time it's different. I don't see any reasonable way out of this other than austerity and by the time we get to that, it may just be too late.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:36 | Link to Comment Tuco Benedicto ...
Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez's picture

What is inflation adjusted GDP!?  What is "real" GDP!?  It is negative! 

 

Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:33 | Link to Comment Tuco Benedicto ...
Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez's picture

I hope you are right!

 

Tuco

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:36 | Link to Comment steve from virginia
steve from virginia's picture

 

The booms won't come back.

The cars will go b/c the fuel to run them will be too expensive and car makers won't sell enough to keep the factory doors open. Decline feeds on itself just like expansion feeds asset value increases.

A non- flow economy will not have price spreads to arbitrage. No booms or busts, more like JP Morgan's "fluctuations".

No cars, no finance: I'm looking forward to it, maybe see some bankers on trial.

 

One can only hope, right?

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:36 | Link to Comment smithcreek
smithcreek's picture

"Things are never as bad as the media hypes it up to me."

 

I'm at a loss to recall the media hyping negative things over the past couple years.  So, by things do you mean the "we stopped the freefall" of early '09, "green shoots" of late '09, or the "stimulus is working and creating millions of jobs" and "we're in a recovery" of early '10, the "things are really starting to pick up" of late '10, the "might have hit a tiny soft patch, but don't worry" of early '11 or the "we got by the soft patch" of mid-'11?  If anything there has been an absolute lack of anything but rosey bullshit for 3 years.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:34 | Link to Comment Long-John-Silver
Long-John-Silver's picture

Great Depression II Bitchez!

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:00 | Link to Comment snowball777
snowball777's picture

+++

What's behind that wallpaper?

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 17:58 | Link to Comment knowless
knowless's picture

more wallpaper, but after that there's these weird scribblings with doodles of mushroom clouds...

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:46 | Link to Comment Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

I think the patten is set for at least a decade: stimulus measures followed by modest growth lasting about 3 quarters, followed inevitably by a grinding slump that threatens to go "GDP-negative", only to be rescued with more stimulus. 

And that will pass for "Growth", at least on paper, so that the Fed, politicians and TPTB can pat themselves on the back and go clink glasses filled with Crystal. 

But the endless daisy-chained monetary stimulus obscures the underlying decay: declining trade, declining consumer, continued exporting of jobs and industry, government layoffs, reduced government spending on research, declining individual net worth and cash flow. 

Most of the stimulus is going "supply-side", meaning to benefit corporations, not individuals. It will permit corporations to borrow more through bond issuance and to dilute their stock. The financial sector will be kept afloat, but as it becomes more clear that the American investor is not coming back, look for a gradual head count reduction on Wall Street and all major banking, asset management and hedge funds. Shrinking retirement funds such as social security won't help.

 

The pattern is clear: The Downsizing of the US economy continues for as far as the eye can see 

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:03 | Link to Comment oldmanagain
oldmanagain's picture

+1

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 13:27 | Link to Comment Ricky Bobby
Ricky Bobby's picture

Were turning japanese, turning japanese. I really think so.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 19:01 | Link to Comment AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

no we are turning into 1930s Germany. Except we are the jews and jews are the nazis.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:45 | Link to Comment Economic Darwinism
Economic Darwinism's picture

I couldn't get past the horrible misuse of a popular quote often attributed to Einstein. The full quote should be:

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."

It is generally used when there has been a gross oversimplification rendering an idea/model meaningless.

Leaving out the "but not simpler" completely changes the intended meaning.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 16:42 | Link to Comment malek
malek's picture

+c squared

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:47 | Link to Comment mess nonster
mess nonster's picture

Who the FUCK put Roundup all over my green shoots?????

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:30 | Link to Comment Tuco Benedicto ...
Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez's picture

That was Monsanto!  They have developed some grass that is resistant to roundup (no kidding).  If some roundup happens to blow in your yard which has non-resistant grass too bad for you.  Monsanto is a good corparate fascist citizen.

 

Tuco

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 11:48 | Link to Comment Dre4dwolf
Dre4dwolf's picture

so consumers aren't spending/they are cutting back on debt/ they are not buying luxury items/ they are scared to shit.

 

70% of economic growth is based on consumption by consumers.

No consumers = No economy

 

What happens when people collectively decide not to buy things? the economy implodes.

 

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:19 | Link to Comment DeltaDawn
DeltaDawn's picture

After we collectively stop buying, we will be left servicing each other.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 13:13 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Circle jerk?

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 13:10 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Apparently what happens is the government forces you to spend by taxing you and then giving your money away to asshats who will spend it on bonuses for themselves and sending jobs and business overseas. They have the nerve to call it capitalism. Economy declines some more, govt. creates debt for your children, gives it to more asshats, wash, rinse, repeat. 

I owe, I owe,

it's off to work I go!!

Tho I have no debt,

but I must work still yet,

I owe, the Ho. 

 

Going Japaneese, going Japaneese...Some stimulus please...;-D

 

If only we had socialism, there might be some hope...(Capitalism is too much to dream for when you live in a fascist state).

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:26 | Link to Comment Tuco Benedicto ...
Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez's picture

Did you forget that this is a "jobless" recovery!?

 

Tuco

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 21:16 | Link to Comment Bobbyrib
Bobbyrib's picture

Anyone who paid attention over the past ten years knew that the economy was going to be shit for years to come.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:23 | Link to Comment Clay Hill
Clay Hill's picture

Thank you for the chart porn, Mr. Pallotta, much obliged.

We're not looking at Recession, or even Depression.

I'm seeing collapse buddy, and so should you, if you're looking at the same Macro I am.

 

Refusal to develop domestic oil production, and turn the revenue generated towards researching sustainable alternatives... Check.

Refusing to wean ourselves away from Militarily adventurism sold to the masses as protecting freedumb, that in actuality is solely for the purpose of providing access to cheap oil in rigged markets for the benefit of Corporations like GS, and JPM... Check.

Refusing to go after the criminals in the financial realm who have plundered and bled this country dry because they own the politicritters... Check.

Sitting on our thumbs for 70 or 80 years refusing to accept the fact that "yes it is my guy that's the problem" every November when it's time to pull the handle... Check

I could launch into the subject of entitlements, or the Fed, but this is getting my pressure up, so I'll quit now.

We're facing mathematically ensured financial failure coupled with politically unchangeable expectations of relief from the Gov't. by half of the populace.

Expect Collapse Bitchez.

 

 

 

 

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 13:03 | Link to Comment lawrence1
lawrence1's picture

Very well put.  This is obviously a depression and

the Fed cartel will ensure a collapse as they steal the last billions in the name of austerity, robbing the remaining pensions, etc.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:25 | Link to Comment DeltaDawn
DeltaDawn's picture

I like that term freedumb, that is an exact description of the American people at this juncture.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 12:49 | Link to Comment Imminent Collapse
Imminent Collapse's picture

Printing money out of thin air and buying government debt and worthless assets with it...check

Promising more benefits than we can afford...check

Reducing taxes and increasing spending...check

Refusing to live within our means...check

Pissing off a large portion of the world...check

Yeah, I think that we are on the brink of collapse.  The most surprising thing is that it will surprise so many people when it happens.  Sheeple!

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 13:28 | Link to Comment Clay Hill
Clay Hill's picture

You said it better than me, thanks.

In my mind's eye, I can envision a 3,000 mile wide version of "A Brave New World". You know, the part where a serious brou-ha-ha erupts when one of the Deltas breaks the queue for their daily dose of Soma?

Now multiply that times 100 million.

 Oh, and we're fresh out of Soma, Bitchez.

 

Fun times ahead fer sure.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 13:51 | Link to Comment DoctoRx
DoctoRx's picture

Robo must be so ZH-oriented that he forgets that the mainstream is still predicting an acceleration of growth in Q3 and Q4.

Nice post by Macro Story IMO.  Succinct, tells a story, and of course the "recession" call can be understood to be a new "recession" in the greater depression.  Still worth analyzing from an investment standpoint. 

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 14:33 | Link to Comment HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Recession. I am sick of that word.

It is a Depression we are living right now and so far so good.

If not for the Food Stamps and other things by our Government, we would have daily news coverage of soup lines and what have you as happened back in the 30's

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:23 | Link to Comment Tuco Benedicto ...
Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez's picture

What a heroic and prescient title to this nonstory!  If real monetary inflation is 5% and economic growth is 2.9% then we are going ass backwards.  Unless economic growth data is adjusted for inflation it means shit to a tree!

 

P. S.  According to the establishment media in June, 2009    the recession is over!

 

Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 19:27 | Link to Comment AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

neither.

Disinflation. Another term invented by bankster's marketing team to hide the fact that we are screwed for a long time while banksters become billionares.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 15:32 | Link to Comment cosmictrainwreck
cosmictrainwreck's picture

Recession is a technical term that sites regressive growth = "shrinking", hence we are NOT in "recession" at the moment. I'm not sure they have a term for this un-charted water [and nobody will 'fess up]. Best thing I can think of is a chart of a stock that DROPS 20% one day then flounders around a while a that level, then drops another 10% and flounders around at that level, then........

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 16:05 | Link to Comment guidothekp
guidothekp's picture

Can somebody explain how the following gels with the recession-coming-soon hypothesis? Everybody talks about the coming recession/depression, but I am not sure I understand the drivers clearly.

1. GDP is still in the +ve territory. 

2. Assuming an unemployment of 25%, the number of people working has gone down

1 and 2 => those still employed have taken home more. 

Isn't it possible that there are 2 systems in play now? One (the employed) goes up and down and causes the GDP to vary. Another (comprising of those who are out of work) has no effect on GDP any more since this segment has stopped contributing. 

Put another way, the '07 chart may be reflecting what happened when there was one system. The current one may have two systems, which means the current chart may reflect different underlying dynamics.

Isn't it possible that those employed may be able to provide just enough momentum to overcome the drag from those unemployed, from happening? In free market terminology, isn't it possible that the resources have now found a better opportunity?

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 16:05 | Link to Comment guidothekp
guidothekp's picture

Can somebody explain how the following gels with the recession-coming-soon hypothesis? Everybody talks about the coming recession/depression, but I am not sure I understand the drivers clearly.

1. GDP is still in the +ve territory. 

2. Assuming an unemployment of 25%, the number of people working has gone down

1 and 2 => those still employed have taken home more. 

Isn't it possible that there are 2 systems in play now? One (the employed) goes up and down and causes the GDP to vary. Another (comprising of those who are out of work) has no effect on GDP any more since this segment has stopped contributing. 

Put another way, the '07 chart may be reflecting what happened when there was one system. The current one may have two systems, which means the current chart may reflect different underlying dynamics.

Isn't it possible that those employed may be able to provide just enough momentum to overcome the drag from those unemployed, from happening? In free market terminology, isn't it possible that the resources have now found a better opportunity?

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 16:11 | Link to Comment guidothekp
guidothekp's picture

Can somebody explain how the following gels with the recession-coming-soon hypothesis? Everybody talks about the coming recession/depression, but I am not sure I understand the drivers clearly.

1. GDP is still in the +ve territory. 

2. Assuming an unemployment of 25%, the number of people working has gone down

1 and 2 => those still employed have taken home more. 

Isn't it possible that there are 2 systems in play now? One (the employed) goes up and down and causes the GDP to vary. Another (comprising of those who are out of work) has no effect on GDP any more since this segment has stopped contributing. 

Put another way, the '07 chart may be reflecting what happened when there was one system. The current one may have two systems, which means the current chart may reflect different underlying dynamics.

Isn't it possible that those employed may be able to provide just enough momentum to overcome the drag from those unemployed, from happening? In free market terminology, isn't it possible that the resources have now found a better opportunity?

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 16:34 | Link to Comment sasebo
sasebo's picture

If I may speak practically -

I forget who all said workers produce wealth. Wealth is stuff not paper money. Food, clothing, shelter, transportation, energy & health care. That's all that really counts. That's what consumers consume. They don't consume paper money. And with less workers there's less of this stuff & less wealth.

 Money is not wealth - it's just a medium of exchange & store of value. And what does the banks & government produce? Money. They produce no stuff or wealth. They just consume it.

And in our case our wealth is produced not only by American workers but also Chinese, Japanese and other foreign workers. Of course these foreign workers are expecting some of our wealth or stuff in exchange for their wealth they're sending us. But our slick guvmunt & bankers decided they would trick the foreign workers & just send them some of our medium of exchange instead of stuff so they could lay off our workers & make more profits. And when the bankers laid our workers off the workers had less wages & money to use to consume stuff. So the money printer, the Fed started printing more money & gave most of it to the bankers at 0% interest. The bankers are hoarding a lot of it, using some of the free money to buy the Guvmunt's debt & make 3-4% free interest and using the rest of it to gamble on meaningless financial inventions such as CDS, CDO & other derivatives that contribute hardly anything to producing our wealth .

So the bankers & guvmunt are giving the cheaper foreign workers more & more paper money for all the wealth they're producing for us & laying off more & more American workers who aren't needed any more to produce our wealth. In essence the bankers & Guvmunt are using cheaper foreign workers to produce the stuff the bankers & guvmunt consume & thereby make more profits.

Who knows, maybe some day the bankers & guvmunt can get rid of all American workers. Think about how much profits they can make & how much paper money they can print & either give it to foreign workers to produce wealth for them or use to gamble with on their worthless derivatives they sell to the foreign workers.     

    

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 18:05 | Link to Comment rsnoble
rsnoble's picture

In my world everything is still fucked, as so are most of my friends. But we don't count.

Sun, 07/17/2011 - 19:06 | Link to Comment AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

Jewish grandmother in Israel tells the truth about fake bankster Jews in America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjqN4dtbSOA

 

Jew: "They say there are lots of anti-semites out there"

Grandma: "Where? Abroad? Then why don't they come here? If there are anti-semites, why don't they come here [Israel]? Are they waiting to get killed?"

Jew: "Why don't they come?"

Grandma: "Well, they love money.Jews love money. Jews are crooks. A Jew is a crook. They make money there. Why should they come here [Israel] and work for money if they can make money there without working?"

Jew: "Don't they work there?"

Grandma: "They don't work. That's what I'm saying. They have money without working. If they come here, they have to work"

Jew: "How do they have money without working?"

Grandma: "How do they make money? Interest. lending money at high rates...selling liquor....wine...Jews know this monkey business. Jews know all about monkey business"

Grandma: "I tell you, I am the real Jew. Money does not blind me."

Jew: "But you talk like anti-semites saying Jews don't work"

Grandme: "No I don't...if they want to stay abroad...Are they waiting for another Hitler to come and kill them before they run away?"

 

Even jews are ashamed. There are many decent jews. They know if they don't police themselves, then world will give rise to the second coming of Hitler.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!