You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Guest Post: When Will Inflation Really Hit Us?

Tyler Durden's picture




Submitted by Terry Coxon of The Case Report

 




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:23 | Link to Comment Hondo
Hondo's picture

Hard to inflate when the economy is deflating.  Domestic goods and economy deflating.....foreign goods inflating due to deflating $$........net result...lower standard of living for Americans.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 18:30 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

Inflation will strike like lightening if the Fed continues with QE.  I'm not talking about house price inflation, I'm talking about commodity and import inflation.  See the article below:

http://jsmineset.com/2009/08/19/the-countdown-to-the-implosion-of-the-dollar/

The Chinese, Russians, and others are looking for verification from Bernanke the QE is done in early November.  If not, better buy your rice and beans fast!  I'm betting that the author is wrong and that Bernanke is not stupid enough to continue - the implications would be totally disasterous for the economy, the bond market and the stock market.  Giving up on QE just takes out the stock market and hurts the bond market but doesn't destroy it.  Pick your poison - there is no free lunch.  I believe the market is topping out if it hasn't already and will tank imminently.

Sun, 10/25/2009 - 04:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 19:14 | Link to Comment Clancy
Clancy's picture

M3 supply is deleveraging.  M2 supply (printed) is going up.  So deflation in the short term, inflation in the long.  Or maybe they'll just cancel each other out creating some weird eye-of-the-hurricaine like stability.

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 03:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:31 | Link to Comment asdf
asdf's picture

no inflation until deleveraging stops. That will take years.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=a5682ThUSwY4

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:35 | Link to Comment Prophet of Wise
Prophet of Wise's picture

Tyler, as your previous post verifies. Today's "inflation" is not quantified in the fraudulent CPI calculations but rather in destroying the underlying value of the coin of the realm. We're only doubling down on history:

http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/8/saupload_purchasing_power.png

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:36 | Link to Comment geopol
geopol's picture

Inflation is already out there,, it's looking for a place to settle. It's already hit in segments. oil,food,stocks... But just begining.. Hyper inflationary depression over the horizon..Get out of dollar denominated anything.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:48 | Link to Comment Internet Tough Guy
Internet Tough Guy's picture

Agreed. These things take years, even the Weimar inflation got a slow start. Once started though, impossible to stop, and we have started.

Watch the big money move out of the country, government impose soft and hard currency controls, people begin to cast about everywhere for a place to save their wealth. The bubbles in stocks and real estate show this; ever more sudden, sharp rallies in asset prices for no discernable reason as the circle gets smaller and smaller.

After that there is only the sudden stop.

 

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:57 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

The current stock bubble is inflation.  Weimar was hyperinflationary.  Please note the crucial difference between the two.

Inflation is the effect of printing money.  More money = more supply = falling demand = falling value of currency = debasement.

Hyperinflation is the effect of a loss of confidence in that currency.  No confidence = increasing velocity of money = falling value of currency + feedback loop = expired currency.

Two different concepts.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:00 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

The stock market is currently up because of all the money printing.  More money in equities means more dollars in circulation.

Weimar happened because of a loss of confidence in the currency.  The same as happened in Zimbabwe.  Nobody wanted a note that was backed by nothing that the government kept printing more of.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 18:55 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

How about all the hundreds of billions/trillions that went overseas?  The winners of the OTC derivatives?  Etc?  The money is out there.  Maybe not the trillions printed, but inflation has occured.

I am Chumbawamba.

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 15:18 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

All your points are excellent, of course, and spot on, but, I'm wondering if we can draw at least some parallels between the future several years in the American economy and what transpired in the Hong Kong economy back in the '90s, after China took it over, and HK experienced hyperinflation, with deflation (if I'm recalling correctly) due to China's offshoring HK jobs to their mainland, while folding the HK dollar into China's currency?

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:01 | Link to Comment Internet Tough Guy
Internet Tough Guy's picture

Thanks for the tip, chimichanga, but the Weimar stock market was initially just like ours; it had a positive real return over certain periods. Eventually everthing became consumed in hyperinflation.

 

p.s. Mexican food gives me ignitable gas.

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 19:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:42 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

New Gold bug shopping for an opinion.

I have been offered 17 1/10 fractionals @ $125 each. Never done fractionals before. Spot is now 1053.50.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:47 | Link to Comment geopol
geopol's picture

Are you talking American eagles??? I'll take all of them,,,@that price.

 

B.T.Y.  Fractional's demand higher premiums. as they are more easily bartered..

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 10:33 | Link to Comment NumisEX
NumisEX's picture

Screw the premiums on fractionals. Stick to 1oz  or greater with gold. Silver is the fractional.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:48 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Hi MsCreant.

That's not a terrible price.  You're basically looking at a premium of $20 per coin.  For denominations of that size, it's not out of the question.  I was paying $30-50 over spot on 1ozt coins (Maple Leafs, American Eagles, etc.) over the past year at varying times in varying economic conditions, so you could do worse than $20 per coin over spot.

I say buy.

Yours, Chumbawamba.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:06 | Link to Comment Internet Tough Guy
Internet Tough Guy's picture

Brilliant, pay $200 per ounce in premium as oppsed to $30-50. I have some fractionals to sell you.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 18:53 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

You pay for the fungibility.  These are easily tradable, and will only go up anyway.  Based on what others have said, it seems she's getting a deal anyway, so go drink a six pack and punch yourself in the face.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 20:21 | Link to Comment Marge N Call
Marge N Call's picture

"so go drink a six pack and punch yourself in the face."

LMAO. Holy shit that was funny. I want to have your baby.

 

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 15:26 | Link to Comment Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

Chubby, you fucking rule, dude!

That was tha shiiiiiiiiiiiiit !!!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Q1G76_ysNo

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 15:33 | Link to Comment Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

Dude, you just got served by someone's chubby!

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=563C6C7DB3F8E846&search_query=cr...

All kidding aside, Internet Tough Guy, you completely lived up to your name, to which I say, "BRAVO!"

Authenticity is it's own reward.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:49 | Link to Comment Internet Tough Guy
Internet Tough Guy's picture

Skip the high premiums and buy ounces. If you are worried about divisibity buy silver.

Gold is for wealth storage, silver is for spending, IMO.

 

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:31 | Link to Comment starfish
starfish's picture

Ah Hah...i think i learned something...

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment geopol
geopol's picture

So you don't get kiled, if they are American Eagles, they are at +premium $142.34 Kitco @16:51:00

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:02 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

You're great MsCreant.  You have an answer to last evenings ?

ATB

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:30 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Yes, I checked back a few times on that one. I would say you are doing very well! :-) Wish a nice fat dooby was legal, I'd surely buy, roll, and share!!

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:39 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

And compare some notes on how to spoil a kid that is responsible and respectful.  I would love some additional insights. Lord how I wish it were here as well. I am considering going back to Cali after graduation in May just because. When it is we will.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:27 | Link to Comment Gunther
Gunther's picture

Always something to learn…
Small coins are good to buy something if no other money is available.
As long as you think there will be paper as medium of exchange in the future question is if you want to pay the markup.
On that thought, offer bullion price; that is what the dealer would pay the seller.

Some prices:

Kitco: 0.1 oz Eagle $142.52
https://online.kitco.com/bullion/completelist.html

An usually expensive German coin dealer:
83.50 Euro (=126.25 US$) for 0.1 oz Nugget (other 0.1 oz coins sold out)
http://proaurum.de/edelmetallshop/gold/muenzen_anlage.jsp?action=showPro...

To compare: 1oz maple

Kitco 1140.16$
proaurum 752.5 Eu= 1129.65 $

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:37 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Thanks to all for your answers. All your opinions were helpful. Everyone. I lost out on one Krug and 16 Eagles because I was too slow. I learned a lot from this experience and your input and feel like I will be ready to pull the trigger when it is right next time.

That was cool having all that support so fast. Thanks again.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 19:00 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

Oh well, take the money and go out and find some nice Pamp Suisse or Credit Suisse 1ozt bars.  You'll pay a much smaller premium (in line with the deal you just passed up) and you'll have metal in hand now, which is crucial.  It may not be available in another few weeks.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 20:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 06:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 13:18 | Link to Comment Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

MsCreant-

APMEX almost always has better prices than Kitco and they frequently offer fractional Maple Leafs that have "abrasions" (lightly scratched, not "mint condition -- who cares?) at an even lower preimum.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:44 | Link to Comment curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

Round 2 of deflation about to happend.  Dollar time to rally!

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:50 | Link to Comment californiagirl
californiagirl's picture

Couldn't part of the increase in M1 be due to money coming out of the M3 category? Since M3 is no longer reported? How do we know?  Not being an expert or a Wall Street finance wizard, any insight would be welcome.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 15:21 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Of course no one knows what will happen - obviously this is completely new territory, with over 3,000 categories of credit derivatives and untold layers and levels of securitization, one can only surmise that deleveraging will take ten, twenty, thirty plus years.

It require complete transparency, several miles of supercomputers and some fairly intelligent analysts to deduce even a modicum of guesswork.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:52 | Link to Comment chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

My opinion is that inflation is already here in the form of equities.  The rise in the Dow just happens to coincide with "Quantitative Easing" (how come that term conjures up intimations of anal sex?  maybe it's just me...)

I believe SOME of the rise in basic commodities (particularly the metals) is the inflationary effect of all this money printing.

I think the post just below this one where Tyler says "Either this is another headfake, this time without a Dick Bove scapegoat, or a dollar renaissance could finally be in the making, with a subsequent drubbing of all dollar-denominated assets" is another clue that the wheels are starting to fall off.  But that's a hyperinflationary indicator.  Because this time, when the shit hits the fan, it's not going to be a repeat of Fall 08.

I am Chumbawamba.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:52 | Link to Comment vreporter
vreporter's picture

The deleveraging that has taken place - and continues - is in a way, the saving grace here. Because of this phenomena, it's very difficult to convert all that printed money into spendable or loanable money; all this while credit standards have been permanently adjusted. Commodities, real estate, art and other "hard" assets have more room to drop. Inflation has many fights to go before it can even win one round!

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 16:59 | Link to Comment Printfaster
Printfaster's picture

The Chinese control inflation in the USA.  When they dump their Ts, inflation begins

Until thin, inflation is theoretical concept.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:06 | Link to Comment asdf
asdf's picture

and China can't dump their treasuries because 

- it would kill their savings

- it would kill their export oriented economy and trigger a chinese depression

 

therefore, inflation is a theoretical concept.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:25 | Link to Comment rek
rek's picture

They don't even need to "dump" their treasuries all they have to do is not buy as many new ones as we need. In this way our economy is a lot like a ponzi scheme: we rely on constant new investment to pay off the old investment because in reality we can't afford to do anything else. While I agree that our economy and currency collapsing is clearly not in the best interest of China, that doesn't mean it cannot happen.

At the rate we are racking up debt it's highly likely that China and other foreign countries will not be able to afford to support our debt - even if they want to. Even if everything goes according to the governments best case scenerio plans we're going to rack up trillions more in debt over the next decade. Right now China holds "only" about 800 billion. They have their own economic problems to deal with, think they can really afford to double, triple, quadruple, or more? Not for long.

Exponential growth, in anything, is simply unsustainable. We'll find that out eventually.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:37 | Link to Comment geopol
geopol's picture

I think the chinese have a very interesting plan for the U.S.. It goes like this... We no longer need your market Yankee dog. Our currencies are going to rise....we buy own stuff.we have 1.2 billion consumers who are now able to by our own washing machines..get it, we no longer need Yankee dog....

 

P.S. Walmart in drastic price reductions for the holidays... =blood bath

 

BTW Where is Walmart going to get it's inventory... not the Chinese anymore....hummm

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:28 | Link to Comment Printfaster
Printfaster's picture

Not necessarily.  If payments for resources or food come due, then the dollar goes.  Basically the buck is OK unless the Chinese cannot drive a sufficient export economy.  The Chinese are trying to hedge that by buying foreign productive assets.

 

 

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:08 | Link to Comment ChickenTeriyakiBoy
ChickenTeriyakiBoy's picture

as cashin reminded this morning, mind velocity. $800+ billion excess reserves. yikes

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:15 | Link to Comment Biff Malibu
Biff Malibu's picture

One thing I've noticed is that Dow Transports have gotten totally uber pwnaged that last few days.  Sign of things to come?

 

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:26 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Not bad for a link into an investment product-short and smooth. Appears to be in line with J. S. Kim's investment strategy. Not sure though, clicked on the link but got nowhere.

Waiting 36 months to start making some real money still bums me out. Like old Ian says, life is a long song, but the tune ends to soon for us all.

If it was not for all the criminals being rooted out of their snake holes by the weasels, there would be no reason to blog for another 3 years.

And while we are on the subject of making money, I want to ask you guys to stop making fun of us little guys who buy on the dips. Believe it or not, some of us are not independently wealthy. We attempt to make costs by working for low wages because or skills are no longer needed. We race home each night hoping we have not been stopped out of our AUY 100 shares.

I need these guys to keep buying and selling. I have resold and repurchased seven times the same five stocks I bought in May. The paltry amount (as weighted by the effluent members of this blog) I have made during this time has, carpeted my living room, replaced my tires, bought a root canal and cap and, paid for my girl friend to never come back.

I have property taxes, homeowner’s insurance and flood insurance due in 90 days. If you cause these hard working slow grasping friends of mine to stop purchasing hope, then I will have to go to the pound and get a sickly puppy, rent a wheel chair, put on nasty looking clothes, paint a sign that reads, homeless vet, any help would be appreciated, sit at a major corner, and stare blankly at the poor people in the car.

Do you want that on your conscience? I hope not- but I bet Cheeky does.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:33 | Link to Comment Biff Malibu
Biff Malibu's picture

Waterdog, I thought I was reading my own profile.  I think there's more of "us" here than you think.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:43 | Link to Comment geopol
geopol's picture

paid for my girl friend to never come back

 

Ah shit, and you said you weren't making any money. The above had to cost you the price of a Buick..

 

Priceless

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 15:47 | Link to Comment Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

Q- Why does a divorce cost so much?

A- Because it's worth it.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 10:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 13:35 | Link to Comment Oxytan
Oxytan's picture

Simple, really?

Ask the good Dr. G. Gono if no jobs means price deflation!  Deflation alright, but for you're refering to the currency!  Got 100 Trillion Z$ framed to prove you WRONG!

 

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 15:25 | Link to Comment sgt_doom
sgt_doom's picture

Well...yes and no.  Figure into the equation that the dollar is being moved away from its reserve currency status, they hyperinflation sets in on a number of items - leading to a mix of hyperinflation with deflation.

Curiouser and curiouser.....

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 16:08 | Link to Comment Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

I believe that the future of our economy is best explained by using the Teller-Ulam theory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teller%E2%80%93Ulam_design

Hyper-inflation doesn't just spontaneous occur- sort of like nuclear fusion.  BUT, a deflationary cycle to jump-start a macroeconomic revolution (dollar loses reserve status, etc.), like using a  fission detonator to establish the critical mass for a fusion reaction, and you have this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwlNPhn64TA&NR=1

Have a nice day.

 

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:48 | Link to Comment Apocalypse Now
Apocalypse Now's picture

Interesting that nobody ever talks about the trillions in derivatives - nobody knows the details of these, and if they start to lose value through deleveraging I believe deflation can last a long time.  I still believe a GDII or Japanese scenario is the most likely.

What is the jobs outlook?  Until you can even begin answering that question in the positive, the inflation already occured (prior bubbles) and we are still in deflation.

I agree with the 50/50 allocation and like pre-1922 swiss francs for collectors.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 17:53 | Link to Comment geopol
geopol's picture

Glad you brought that up.. I thinks it's at $650,000,000,000.000.00, It looks to me like jubilee time.

 

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 00:29 | Link to Comment Assetman
Assetman's picture

Excellent observation, Mr Brando...

As amazing as $800 billlion in reserves are, it's even more amazing to be that there is a heavy incentives for banks to be hoarding them.

Sure some of the reason is bad debt-- but for the 5 largest banks-- it's those finanical weapons of mass destruction.  People just do not appreciate how concentrated and massive even these net exposures are...

Now that being said, the Fed was testing the waters for the reverse repo for a reason... and it wasn't deflation.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 18:19 | Link to Comment PAPA ROACH
PAPA ROACH's picture

I vote deflation in the near future. The trouble with stats like M1 is they do not tell you who sits on that, in this case mostly the upper 1% of the population, meanwhile the real consumer is not fattening his checkbook by 17%+; job losses continue etc etc. If Bill Gates gets 5% more cash, it creates no velocity and no inflation.

I think we are on the cusp of this inflation bandwagon and all the long gold/commodities/equities trades going south in a mass game of musical chairs, with only a small fraction of chairs vs. players. As they say in Vegas, "good luck sir".

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 18:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 20:45 | Link to Comment Renfield
Renfield's picture

SO weird reading about 'dee...fla...shun'. What is this word you speak of?

Here in Aus, our family food shopping budget is about double what it was three years ago; our petrol prices are the highest in the world; house prices and rents are stagnating at their bubble highs; what else is there? Oh yes, stock market has enjoyed a 60% rally (thanks USA) and our government is passing out 'cash for clunker homes' stimulus packages like it's going out of style. Ever-increasing commodities prices will pay for all this dontcha know.

Our central bank just raised rates and seems set to consecutive rate rises through July:

"Markets now predict that the Reserve board will raise rates at seven consecutive meetings, lifting its cash rate from 3 per cent 10 days ago to 4.75 per cent by May and 5 per cent by July."

http://www.theage.com.au/business/seven-rate-rises-in-a-row-tipped-20091015-gz64.html

Credit card rates meanwhile hover between 15% and 30% depending on how compliant a debtor you are, and oh yeah, let's not forget the paucity of interest rates on CITIZEN SAVINGS accounts (yes, in many accounts at 0.01% here too). Wages are stagnant, but not cut (yet) and even if they are, those aren't prices are they?

Deflation in what? Flat-screen TVs and Christmas shopping? Or does deflation/inflation pertain now only to global credit markets and doctored CPI?

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 19:15 | Link to Comment Hammer59
Hammer59's picture

The Fed wanted to monetize the debt, forced to by Bush-league malfeasence and two expensive quagmires we will never win. Try as he might, try as he may, The three stooges have done everything to make us pay. (For the sins of Greenspan/Bush/Paulson/GOP).  Yes, some stimulus has driven equities, but look at the earnings. This American Economy is headed for the Great Depression that the fools have claimed we will avoid. Japan ala 1989. They thought the bailouts and stimuli would bring back the economy, but banks and consumers are shell shocked, hoarding, grabbing Gold/Silver. Housing, labor, energy, food, employment--and soon comodities, all going down hard all over the world.

Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 10/25/2009 - 01:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/23/2009 - 21:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 06:08 | Link to Comment Hunch Trader
Hunch Trader's picture

By the time inflation starts to happen, the market will have priced it in already. I believe the current rally to be a combination of that, dollar debasement and search for interest yield. 'Investing' is dead, it's all a speculative gamble now, and this has fooled many who believe in fundamentals. Yes they're important, but by the time fundamentals turn, casino gamblers will have reaped most of the benefits... I do not like this setup, however that's the way it is.

Besides I have this funny feeling in my tummy that an important part of the inflation has already happened, and the stock market did *not* keep up with that momentum; it's called the $5 coffee.

 

Discl: long SPY, not because I like it, but because I have to.

 

Sat, 10/24/2009 - 08:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 11:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 13:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 14:37 | Link to Comment Lexington Duffet
Lexington Duffet's picture

If we define inflation as the value of the $ to a basket of foods, talking just about the money supply neglects an important point:  the velocity (celerity) of money, defined as  speed at which money is being used.

For example, if we have $1000 stuffed in one matress, that has less actual effect on inflation then $10 being circulated quickly through the economy--something zero as compared $10 to the restaurant at 8 am, $10 to the food supplier at 10 am, $10 to the accountant at 12 am, $10 to the accountant's bookkeeper at 4 pm, bookkeeper to the bookstore at 9 pm. In this example, $1000 has a total net effect of zero while the ten dollars has a net effect of $50 because its used five times.  

In a large example, I'd bet big $ the velocity of money measures are way down, which adds to how deleveraging should cause deflation in the current cycle.  And I think the fact velocity basically dropped to zero as the financial markets seized up caused Bernancke's freak out from fear and  his subsequent committment to showering $ into the market place.  B seems to me a pretty calm man but he physically shaking as he testified before Congress begging for $.  (not saying he used it all wisely, if anyone could)

Of course, the market disagrees with me as it has risen apace so let us see what occurs. 

Don't see how one can argue with the fact that the price DROPS show we are in a deflationary period even with the Fed and Gov pouring $ into the economy. 

Notice International Paper had another set of plant closures and layoffs.  There is a lot of pain out there at the moment.

 

Sun, 10/25/2009 - 03:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 16:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/24/2009 - 19:02 | Link to Comment time123
time123's picture

I believe inflation has been hitting us for a decades now, it is just that it has been a slow process and that is why it has not been very noticeable. 

What we have been experiencing over the last couple of years is a short term reversal in this long term inflation process. It will likely resume as soon as the economy starts growing again in any significant way.

 

time123

at http://invetrics.com

Sun, 10/25/2009 - 00:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!