You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Guest Post: Will Ignoring The Mistakes Of The Past Result In A 20 Year Bear Market?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:01 | Link to Comment Whizbang
Whizbang's picture

Could be twenty years. I've been talking about the bull thats coming out of the media to anyone who will listen for months. Also, denninger has the much more believable labor data at over 1 million people leaving the labor force, not 260,000.

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/2009/10/02.html

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:22 | Link to Comment IE
IE's picture

Turning Japanese I think we're turning Japanese I really think so.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:10 | Link to Comment rigger mortice
rigger mortice's picture

an excellent piece of work.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:39 | Link to Comment kevinearick
kevinearick's picture

The next step:

The new global output gap information system
measures output gaps for the entire global
population, with several million investigators
adding data in real time. It's much like this
website, only it does not require the Internet.
The filters and kill switches on the Internet
make it unreliable.

But you do not need a big system for day
trading. On your trading preference, oil, whatever,
build a fulcrum of fulcrums with data initially
populated out of good resource and production
atlases, and update like you update everyday,
until you match the existing equilibrium action.

Then build a matching system with participation
output gaps. First estimate whole population output
gaps to get it in synch, then move into sub-
populations. Make estimated guesses for the
output gaps.

What you learn from one system will reveal
adjustments necessary to converted the other,
so you have a self-reinforcing mechanism.
It is not dissimilar to the relationship
between the balance sheet, and the income
statement.

Here's a basic algorithm you may find helpful:

Egrowth = (C + I) / G
B/S(I)
/ talent development --- idea holders --- ideas --- B/S(I) ---
I/S(I)(real labor) --- B/S(I) retained talent investment +
profit taking;
Multiplier Effect - B/S(C) w I/S(I) feed
/ profit taking --- alternative talent development B/S(I) +
consumption (surplus / waste);
/ consumption --- I/S(C) --- B/S(C) + G
/ B/S(C) inflation = retained earnings + dividends +
interest + salaries --- I/S(C) --- B/S(C) + G
B/S(C) deflation, I/S(I) short-circuit --- decomposition
/ monetary misdirection --- B/S(C) bubble reflation ---
real asset liquidation --- I/S(C) --- insolvency
/ until, unless I/S(I) circuit restored,  talent emigration

/ magnetic side - effective allocation of talent
/ gravitational side - efficient allocation of capital

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 15:19 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

I think I'd find it even more helpful just to use yours... output that is.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 19:37 | Link to Comment kevinearick
kevinearick's picture

that would be like using a sledge hammer

to install siding. Possibly interesting, but ....

(or chasing a butterfly with a sledge

in cases like gold)

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:48 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Mistakes, as egregious as they have been, will not result in "a 20 year bear market", but in NO MARKET (for paper assets i.e.).

Sun, 10/04/2009 - 11:11 | Link to Comment Marge N Call
Marge N Call's picture

Agreed. We'll be LUCKY to have a 20 year bear market if this keeps up.

At this point, with the die cast, I just can't imagine how the markets/economy can heal themselves without a major disruption, e.g. total meltdown, WW III, civil war.

While I want to believe it will all be OK, every day brings more evidence that a major disruption is inevitable. We are on a path that has never been taken before, and the pilots of the ship are not only clueless, but incredibly corrupt and incredibly powerful. Seems like a recipe for a world-class clusterfuck of the highest magnitude.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:51 | Link to Comment DBLTapViper
DBLTapViper's picture

To be so bold - this guy(s) (Gals?) missed a very large point,  Japan had the U.S. to support it's economy.  Who supports the U.S. during this deflationary depression?  Answer:  No one.  Maybe, just maybe if Uncle Ben starts putting money into our checking accounts every month (I'd like 1 Billion dollars, thank you very much) that may make us feel a little better about what is actually happening.  

 

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:08 | Link to Comment OrganicGeorge
OrganicGeorge's picture

I maybe be full of shit, but I need more data to fully buy into this parallel with Japan.

I don't disagree with the premise that resolution of debt is paramount to ending this financial crisis.

There just something that doesn't feel right about the data.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:52 | Link to Comment tewkatz
tewkatz's picture

Suggestion:  Fannie and Freddie offer 1% 30 year mortgages to anyone who has a mortgage as of 10/1/09.  All liquidity needed to provide these mortgages is provided by the Fed printing-press.

We'd be paying $20 for a loaf of bread/gallon of gas, but we'd be out of expensive debt and the banks get paid back many loans that are going bad???

Heck, let's go for 0 to .25% like the big boys get!

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 15:16 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

Awesome post... but what we are in now is an order of magnitude larger than Japans problem. The starting points were also much more favorable to the Japanese situation.

We need more people manning the oars (jobs) rather than just finding a new way to refi the slave galley.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 16:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 16:34 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

Something for all inflationistas to pounder:

We are sitting on piles of unfunded liabilities:  social security, medicare, public and private pensions.  Inflating the currency does not eliminate these unfunded and unspecified liabilities.  They will have to be paid back in future, inflated terms.

Sat, 10/03/2009 - 09:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 09:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!