A Guest's Contrarian Take On Dennis Kucinich's Recent Attempt To "End The Fed"

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Arkady Kamenetsky of Right Condition

Dennis Kucinich finally shows the world why the Left is also against the Federal Reserve, gains support of Tea Party activist?

I have always mused and wondered out loud about the peculiar alliance
between the likes of Ron Paul - a small government sound money advocate
and people like Alan Grayson and Bernie Sanders who are admitted
socialists.  What is it about these two completely polarizing political
viewpoints that brought them together to fight the Fed?  In fact, I was
utterly shocked that some libertarians mourned the defeat of Alan
Grayson this past November citing his defeat as a loss in the battle
against the Federal Reserve.

At the time my speculation was rather simple.  Socialists resent the
Federal Reserve just as much as we do, however for entirely different
reasons.  We resent the Fed for several basic reasons.  The Federal
Reserve is a monopoly and controls the supply of money.  It centrally
plans interest rates and has a flawed mandate to create full employment
which is an illogical desire - because employment should always be
liquid.  Finally the Federal Reserve has a mandate of steady inflation
which erodes the value of the money we hold and crushes savings bringing
about a 95% decrease in the value of the dollar since the Federal
Reserve's inception.  Leftists like Grayson, Sanders and Kucinich hate
the Fed because it is a private bank and usurps the power of Congress.  I
concede that this is indeed a problem as the Federal Reserve actually
controls more of the US budget than Congress and does so through
unelected officials!   Yet the solution to our fiscal woes is to return
to sound money and to break down the monopoly, something the Left will
surely balk at.  Indeed, here comes a proposal from Rep. Dennis Kucinich
that finally confirms my speculation.

Read full bill at Kucinich's website, which he cleverly and so predictably in true liberal fashion dubs "the National Emergency Employment Defense Act of 2010".

To create a full employment economy as a matter of national economic
defense; to provide for public investment in capital infrastructure; to
provide for reducing the cost of public investment; to retire public
debt; to stabilize the Social Security retirement system; to restore the authority of Congress to create and regulate money,
modernize and provide stability for the monetary system of the United
States, retire public debt and reduce the cost of public investment, and
for other public purposes.

There you have it folks.  Dennis wants the power of the Federal Reserve
in Congress.  His ambitions are actually quite disturbing because he is
also pursuing the flawed concept of full employment, but now he has
added even grander ambitions - the one thing that the horrible Federal
Reserve prevented Congress from doing - creating money for the purpose
of spending it.   Granted with QE2 in full swing it becomes difficult to
make that argument, because buying US debt so that the US Government
can continue functioning is essentially the same thing, but at least our
total debt grows and Americans are still aware of the cost.  With
Kucinich's bill this aspect disappears as money will appear whenever
Congress wishes it to be so and the value imbued in this money will come
through Congress alone - a Chartalist dream come true.

The bill also offers an end to fractional reserve lending, a key
inflationary engine where banks lend to other banks at a fraction
thereby creating mountains of credit on top of a very small amount of
money.  On page 40 of the bill, money in deposit institutions must :  be held for the exclusive use of the account holder; and may not be used by a depository institution to fund loans or investments.

Yeah, that can work when the exclusive lending power now falls to
Congress!  Ironically, there are two ways to stop fractional
reserve lending.  One is to use sound money and prohibit paper from
being pyramided on top of the sound money much like it was done in the
1800s in America (and for 20 years under the Federal Reserve) and the
other way is for Government to take over lending.   Indeed on page 11,
the bill explicitly calls for:

To enable the Federal Government to invest  or lend new money into
circulation as authorized by Congress and to provide means for public
investment  in capital infrastructure.

So not only will the Government take over lending as a whole, but they
will do so for what they dub to be 'good investment' or infrastructure! 
A central planner's dream come true.

This bill also has the support of blogger Karl Denninger a Tea Party
activist from Florida, who in my opinion seriously undermines his
credibility by not only defending the bill out of principle, but also on a Constitutional basis! 

But it would be a monstrous improvement over what we have now, and I
will remind Mush that in point of fact we had Colonial Script some
rather long time ago, and further, there is nothing in The Constitution that prohibits the Federal Government from issuing and fixing the value of fiat currency.  In fact, such is explicitly contemplated and expected by The Constitution. 

Bigger nonsense cannot be found.  Now unless Dennis Kucinich proposes a
return to the gold standard, the entire bill fails along Constitutional
grounds and in fact, this is the very reason the Federal Reserve
exists!!  The Fed has the power to create fiat money BECAUSE it is a
private institution, Congress could never do it and if they could -
there would have been no Fed in the first place.   There are two clauses
in the Constitution that completely disprove Karl's notions.  There is
also the history of the Continental which saw America's first paper
currency go up in smoke due to inflation. 

Keep in mind, anything not specifically enumerated in the Constitution is not allowed. 

Article 1 Section 8 contains the following:

[The Congress shall] To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of
foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

As you can plainly see, Congress has the power to create coins or
regulate other coins and ensure standards in weight.  Nothing about
paper here.  In fact, they go on and in Article Section 10 state:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant
Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make
any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass
any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the
Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Which explicitly bans paper money on a State level or what they call
Bills of Credit and in fact go on and actually demand that payment of
taxes be performed in coin. In fact one could aptly call today's dollars
Bills of Credit. So by not enumerating the power to create paper money
for the Federal Government, while explicitly banning paper money on a
State level the Constitution packs a 1-2 punch that flat out destroys
paper money and insists on money as something that has tangible value.
Does that make me a gold bug? Not at all, use whatever you want for
money, just make sure it has value because as long as money has value
then no institution (Fed, Congress) can make it out of thin air.

Yet Karl insists that this bill is exactly what the country needs
because it promises to be neither inflationary or deflationary. His
faith comes from page 26 of the Bill:

pursue a monetary policy based on the governing principle that the
supply of money in circulation should not become inflationary nor
deflationary in and of itself, but will be sufficient to allow goods and
services to move freely in trade in a balanced manner.
The Monetary Authority shall maintain long run growth of the monetary
and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy’s long run potential
to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of
maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate longterm interest rates.

 Oh ok, so because Congress promises to make sure that the supply of
money and prices remains stable then instability will not happen? If
they promised us unicorns that crapped skittles within a bill does
everyone go out and buy a stable? In fact, Karl dubs this bill 'Delete
the Fed' yet the bill creates a new office called The Monetary Authority
which will have a chairman and appointed members (10 of them) chosen by
the president that will meet on a regular basis and determine the
correct supply of money. Whiskey-tango-foxtrot, we already have that and
it's called the Board of Governors. Instead of getting rid of the Fed
though, Kucinich is going to move the entire reserve system into the
executive branch. What a joke.

Essentially this bill takes the Federal Reserve, renames it, makes it
part of Congress and moves a private monopoly into a public monopoly. So
instead of having the spending habits of Congress show up on the
national debt, everything will now quietly happen through the power of
Congressional members who can order money creation any time they feel
like making an additional investment or building a Bridge to Nowhere.

As one last step before the final takeover, Kucinich plans to eliminate
our debt. Sounds lovely does it not? Page 19 describes the process:

Before the effective date, the Secretary shall commence to retire all
outstanding instruments of indebtedness of the United States by payment
in full of the amount legally due the bearer in United States Money, as
such amounts become due.

Elsewhere in the bill, Kucinich introduces a new money, called the
United States Money although I suggest we just call it a Zimbabwe Dollar
because that is it's destiny and we can save on printing costs. This
United States Money will invariably have a conversion rate to the
current US Dollar. In order for us to retire about 14 Trillion dollars
of private and public debt, imagine for a second just how many new USM
notes must be created? What will be the value of these USM notes? What
happens to the dollar's reserve status that we enjoy now? Let me answer
that for you: a metric ton, value will be non-existent and the one
remaining reason why America is protected from hyper-inflation will be
wiped out.

Mike Shedlock has also written a summary
about this bill and called out Karl Dennginer's support which has now
the potential to escalate into a blog war. This prompted Karl to call
Mish 'mush' and make wild statements about the Constitution.  Karl also
believes that if Ron and Rand Paul are for real than they will support
this bill otherwise they are empty suits and fakes.  I will tell you
this right now, Ron and Rand will never ever support this bill because
it is a hideous and disgusting piece of legislation.

Yes this will will destroy the top banking elite and their easy money
access through inflation, but this is no different than what North Korea
did to it's currency - a gigantic devaluation of the dollar along with
massive takeover by Congress over the last remainings parts of our

This is central planning on steroids and yet a Tea Party activist and well known blogger supports it. I am speechless.