You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Here Is Why The Fed Needs To Cut The Dollar In Half Over The Next 14 Years

Tyler Durden's picture




Just in case you thought Tim Geithner was telling the truth about desiring a strong dollar, here is an opinion by Jim Rickards on why the US is getting increasingly wrapped up in its stock market bubble, middle class and imports be damned, and why the dollar's value will get cut in half in the near future. 

h/t Ian




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:24 | Link to Comment RagnarDanneskjold
RagnarDanneskjold's picture

Not true. This argument is bunk due to the Triffin Paradox. Once a single nation's currency becomes the reserve currency, it must spend more than it saves. This is what so many miss about bashing the U.S. consumer culture, it is a necessity due to the closing of the gold window.

The U.S. is the world's money supplier. The only way for foreigners to get dollars is for the U.S. to invest overseas, hold foreign currency, or consume foreign made goods. No matter what path is chosen, massive imbalances will develop in the global system. (There is the solution of empire. If the U.S. started absorbing nations, or they dollarized their economies and harmonized economic, tax, regulatory laws with the U.S., the problem could be averted.)

Under a gold standard, no nation needs to run a persistent deficit or surplus, in fact it is impossible as long as they don't go off the standard. Gold will flow in and out in response to trade flows, and vice versa, holding international balances in a equilibrium range.

The idea that SDRs are a solution is nuts. The governments of the world obviously want to use SDRs because it puts them in control of the money. But it's the same solution as the creation of the Fed, it kicks the inherent failures of the system up a level in order to delay reform. And as Rickards points out, the U.S. will lose its ability to operate in the world.

Under gold, only the U.S. government loses freedom. The people are as free as ever, though the welfare-warfare folks may dislike the restricted options for government. Under an SDR standard, the U.S. government retains some currency control, but under the control of foreign governments. It will reduce freedom.

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:40 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

Going to do some weekend thinking Ragnar ...

Thanks for the box of 38's.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 15:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 16:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 04:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 10/04/2009 - 01:44 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Great post. SDR's are nothing but an attempt to completely globalize the savings based eastern economies into an illusionary debt based system.

SDR's are as NUTTY as nutty gets. It's divorcing every economy from itself and putting everybody else in control which will eventually be slippery sloped to a completely divorced global banking system that nobody can revolt from as it structures co-dependency into the global sphere. Nobody will end up with the farming or factory or food or enegry resources it needs to be independant. It'll be chess moved into as complete co-dependancy as it can achieve.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:23 | Link to Comment Mos
Mos's picture

Theoretically they can cut the dollar in half every 14 years forever.  San Fran Fed has probably devoted countless hours of time and money to researching this strategy.  Trial run of said strategy currently undergoing implementation.  Success of the program will result in a published paper that 14 people will read.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:24 | Link to Comment stoverny
stoverny's picture

middle class?  what's that?

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:29 | Link to Comment shargash
shargash's picture

I don't buy the argument. Devaluing your currency only solves a debt problem if you don't layer new debt on the old debt faster than you devalue the old debt. If you have 60 trillion in unfunded liability, halving your currency only reduces your debt to 30 trillion AFTER you have borrowed the money. If you devalue before you borrow the money, you just have to borrow twice as much, and THAT at a higher interest rate.

Edit: And, once the dollar isn't the world's reserve currency, will the US still be able to borrow in dollars? If not, the decline in the currency will crush your old debt, not deflate it.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:26 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

Chicago eliminated in the first round

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:30 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

OK Ben, the world just gave the US the proverbial Olympic middle finger. You can let go now.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:36 | Link to Comment I am a Man I am...
I am a Man I am Forty's picture

I am sooooooooo surprised.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 16:43 | Link to Comment DrPsycho
DrPsycho's picture

"Dope, alcohol, left wing ideology, "do your own thing" , gangsta rap, atheism..."

 

    ...right wing nitwits........

 

 

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:30 | Link to Comment Daedal
Daedal's picture

Cut in Half -- Does that make Jim Rickard a pessimist or optimist? I vote latter.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:30 | Link to Comment pigpen
pigpen's picture

Why does Ben and Timmy hate in no particular order?

Savers

Old people

Main street

Non speculators

Future generations who had no say in assuming all this debt

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:52 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Pigpen, I love your comments but you're asking a question of morality when in their minds it doesn't apply at all.

They don't hate "Savers, Old People, Main street, Non speculators and Future generations who had no say in assuming all this debt" in the same way you don't hate that ant you just stepped on.

All those people you mentioned (of which I am one) are simply in their way. When you don't value something, it's very easy to destroy it without a second thought.

Do you ask yourself this type of moral question after stepping on that ant? If you do, good for you. But most people would not and would think you silly (or worse) for asking.

Sat, 10/03/2009 - 09:11 | Link to Comment Marge N Call
Marge N Call's picture

Sad as it is, you are correct CD. We are merely fodder. I am sure Timmay and gang don't waste a millesecond of thought on us, the people who pay the bills and fuel the US economic engine.

"It's good to be the King".

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:49 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

You're da man, pigpen.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:31 | Link to Comment Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

This has been the plan for some time.  People reflect on Weimer Republic's hyperinflation as a mistake but it wasn't.  The easiest way to get rid of a debt you can't pay is to create hyperinflate it to nothing.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:45 | Link to Comment shargash
shargash's picture

That only works if you stop borrowing. What are the odds of that happening?

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:02 | Link to Comment Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

Agreed.  The US lacks a manufacturing and exporting base.  How it is going to transition from being the reserve currency... no idea.  If the IMF is going to slowly take over from the USD... tough times ahead.

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:14 | Link to Comment pigpen
pigpen's picture

Yes didn't the Germans have treasury notes as opposed to a federal reserve system? The banking oligarchs and powers to be hated the idea of Germany not having a central bank.

History is much better from the vanquished perspective.

 

Cheers,

Pigpen

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:32 | Link to Comment Hansel
Hansel's picture

I'm having a hard time understanding what the dollar will depreciate against when nearly all assets seem overpriced and people continue to lose jobs.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:47 | Link to Comment fxguy
fxguy's picture

For one close by, just look at the Canadian dollar (CAD)
It was only a year or two ago that a single USD was
worth $1.35 CAD, now it's $1.08. Go back a few more
years and USD/CAD was $1.40, maybe even $1.50!

Since the US imports most of its oil and natural gas from
Canada, this is not good for US consumers.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_l...

The same is true for EUR/USD, which means travel to
Europe will be very very expensive for anyone from the
US. On the other hand, Europeans will be able to come
to the US and purchase everything for what amounts
to a 50% discount.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 17:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:56 | Link to Comment Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

The dollar will continue to depreciate against everything with REAL value. That excludes other poorly managed fiat currencies of course.

This means higher prices for everything (except other garbage fiat currencies) and translates into a much lower standard of living for the unfortunate inhabitants of "dollar land".

And yeah, most asset prices will rise -- which is "good" for those who already own them, but "not-so-good" for those that don't, because their inflated prices will make them completely unaffordable for most.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Hansel
Hansel's picture

The S&P is already trading at 129x ttm earnings.  Maybe commodities rise.  Domestic bonds won't.  Like someone else said in this post, even if we devalue 10:1, the gov't will only want to borrow 10x as much.  IMO the dollar value isn't the problem, it's the balance of payments.

Sat, 10/03/2009 - 09:19 | Link to Comment Marge N Call
Marge N Call's picture

+100. Bingo. It doesn't matter whether:

a) you earn 100 fiatscos and spend 200 fiatscos, or

b) you earn 100000 fiatscos and spend 200000 fiatscos.

In the end you will be either:

a) -100 fiatscos with a ratio of roughly 1 fiatsco/1 oz useless metal.

b) -100000 fiatscos with a ratio of roughly .001 fiatsco/1 oz useless metal.

 

Of course, along the way the rest of the world will prefer useless metal or useful gooey black liquid in payment instead of your crappy fiatsco.

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:34 | Link to Comment Mos
Mos's picture

Who'd have thought the printing press would be the greatest invention of last millennium and reinvention of this millennium.  Gutenberg would be proud.  Charles too.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 21:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:35 | Link to Comment Chumly
Chumly's picture

There are too many good morsels here - wow!!!

The cat's out of the bag - the USD ain't worth ^*#@ per the FED.

We will replace one ponzi scheme (USD world reserve currency) with another (IMF-SDR's).

Gold is good but you have a battle with the CB's suppressing its price in order to gradually phase us into various stages of becoming a third world banana republic.

and so forth...

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:50 | Link to Comment Translational Lift
Translational Lift's picture

Gold is good but.....You had better be holding physical gold because there is so much paper floating that when the $hit hits the fan there won't be enough physical to cover all the paper!!!

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 16:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 19:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:35 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

"They inflate the dollar in order to support the banks."

Breaking News.....The center of the universe has a different black hole than previously thought.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 15:00 | Link to Comment TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

"Even the central banks are not bigger than the markets."

That quote pretty much sums up my view. The galaxy will overwhelm that central black hole by destroying the singularity which is the Fed.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 17:32 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

It's core-periphery. No matter how well organized the core is the periphery will just do all the things that people do when they are controlled and abused.

Transform the core. - Transformation strategy

Ignore the core be self reliant, create blackmarkets. - You can't use me If i'm detached from you.

Karmic Control- Brutal unrelenting assault on the cores inadequacies and weaknesses in a crushing intellectual and emotional assault. Think billions of scorpio chics slashing the tires on your bentley, smashing it's windshield and painting you have a small penis on it with lipstick.- Control Strategy.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:36 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

Is the almighty dollar, now that it wears the shadow cloak of fiat, to go on forever--  durable, manipulable and invincible?  Afterall, its very existence on earth is now in the care of mere mortals and, in this case, the emphasis must be placed on the word “mere.”

In that prior to and during most of the 1800s, international trade was denominated in terms of currencies that represented weights of gold,  it has only been since the 1944 meeting in Bretton Woods that the world’s then most prominent socialists  – John Maynard Keynes and Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Harry Dexter White (a member of a Communist espionage ring in Washington who became the first Executive Director for the United States at the IMF)—established the IMF and the World Bank as mechanisms for eliminating gold from finance.  I am not so sure that this short time table has established the Fed’s paper note as so invincible that it can withstand devaluation ad infinitum at zero interest rates at home and still dominate as a global currency.  In fact, I think Bernanke long ago lost the handle on this economic mess--the first of its kind in mankind’s history.

The goal, of course, is to continue to use money power to create and extinguish the nation’s money supply against the public for the personal gain of those who control it.  The problem, of course, is the nation was brought to its knees too early for total manipulability and is not quite ready to totally submit to outside control.   I shudder to think of the wealth already transferred to the oligarchs--without one outcry from the Congress.  The collateral damage is all about us—millions of jobless Americans and college graduates with bleak employment outlooks,  millions of famlilies hit with negative interest rates on their savings of past earnings, millions of retirees trying to subsist on an annual return of $1500 on a $100,000 IRA while paying exorbitant prices for gasoline, heating fuel, food, property and sales taxes, telephone,  house/car/Medicare/Drug/Supplemental insurance premiums, services, credit card debt…using their homes as reverse mortgage collateral, forced to give up their children’s inheritance to the bankers.

The idea behind removing the discipline of gold (stable value) from the dollar, of course, was so that governments could create money out of nothing without their currencies dropping in value on world markets, all inflating together at the same rate—never mind the devastation at home.  But things never do work out too well without at least a little discipline.  Capital for the IMF and World Bank was to come from the industrialized nations with the U.S. putting up the seed corn, but the boyz got greedy and ate most of it.  They sold off the industrial base before they had totally deprived “the people of all their property…on the continent their fathers conquered.”  And, now, revolution is in the air.

Keyne’s dream, of course, was for the IMF to gradually evolve into a central bank for the world, with the World Bank serving as its lending arm, as the engine for transferring the wealth from the industrialized nations to the underdeveloped nations.

His ultimate goal, however, the building of world socialism, seems to have hit a snag.  It not only lowered the economic level of the donating countries, with much of the money simply disappearing down the drain of politcal corruption and into the deep pockets of the investment bankers, but it has about knocked out the U.S. economy—before schedule. And now we have former Fed chair Paul Volcker breaking the sad news to the sheeple that in the “balanced world” he and the masters have envisioned, “all labor is created equal” and under the present leveling course we must accept the Fed’s downward inflationary pressure on our U.S. wages until we are reduced to the world’s common denominator plantation wage.  We are labor, of course; they are management, where the common denominator, say at Goldman Sachs, is $700,000 a year and up.

As has been mentioned on this blog not more than three days ago, these men are conducting no less than the murder of a nation.  But IMO, as the nation goes, so goes the dollar.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:21 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

Hope so.  What a comeuppance it would be to TPTB! Voters on Zero Hedge certainly are in the deflation camp—and the economic IQ here certainly is in the top of the top centile. 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 18:04 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

Actually I think we all agreed on something like Hyperstagdisinflation a couple of weeks ago.

And they don't discriminate against us in the low of the low centiles either.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:45 | Link to Comment futboller04
futboller04's picture

so it sounds as if there's still a diconnect between the outcomes?  Or is it possible to get deflation when the dollar been flushed down the toilet?

Sat, 10/03/2009 - 09:21 | Link to Comment Marge N Call
Marge N Call's picture

I believe the issue not either/or, but more if when each will come.

Personally, I am inclined to say deflation first, followed by nasty, nasty inflation.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:37 | Link to Comment pigpen
pigpen's picture

DXY has fallen 17% since March highs of 92. Annualize that - they are way ahead of schedule on the devaluation express.

Cheers,

Pigpen

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:40 | Link to Comment Chumly
Chumly's picture

All of us tin hats are having our day in the sun, our "see I told you" moment.  The Fed kills the USD and sets the stage for the IMF (the same players) to replace the currency they destroyed in order to create another so they can further consolidate their power.

Barry-O the little messiah is just a pawn, who are the next pawns waiting in the wings??

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:40 | Link to Comment pigpen
pigpen's picture

Non sequitor - but glad Obama and Oprah and Chicago didn't win Olympic bid. I hate celebrities.

I know I am jealous as a former child star I harbor tons of resentment - I was big in the 70's.

Cheers,

Pigpen

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:48 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

maybe they know something - 2016 is a long way off

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:01 | Link to Comment Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

Yes, the USA as we now know it most likely will no longer exist by 2016 and the IOC realizes this. "Sorry Chicago, but we can't be holding Olympic games in what is likely to be a gigantic, anarchic urban wasteland by 2016."

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:48 | Link to Comment LoneStarHog
LoneStarHog's picture

Celebrity?  What is that?

Oh, yeah! I remember.  It is another SCHUMK with a job, but an EGO to boot.

I do not adhere to the term CELEBRITY!

It also applies to any and all politicians, including the President, as ALL are just SCHUMKS with a JOB!

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:41 | Link to Comment SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

Won't happen. There will be revolution in the USA before the Fed is allowed to destroy the currency, as much as they would like to.

Deflation.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:12 | Link to Comment Iceobar
Iceobar's picture

I hear you, but they've already had a practice run since 2002 to "test" the people's reactions....and how many times have you heard Bernanke say to Ron Paul, "It doesn't matter if you stay at home"....?? The more times that "line" gets "Fed" to the lemmings, the more will believe it.....unfortunately.... 

When you're down 96% since 1913, what's another 50% of 4 cents anyway??....;>)

 

http://tfc-charts.w2d.com/charts/USM.GIF

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:44 | Link to Comment Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

This also explains why they control the value of gold.  Gold is a hedge against inflation and its value is a representation of inflation.  If you can control the value of gold, you control people's perception of the truth of the existance of inflation.

 

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 11:49 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

A graph of DXY vs SPY would be quite amusing this morning - the R^2 has to be close to 1.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:11 | Link to Comment Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

Yup. A trademark of a "Banana Republic" stockmarket. Ala Weimar Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Zimbabwe and a host of other socio-economic basketcases. Welcome to the "club" America.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 16:55 | Link to Comment Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

Or you buy commodities and hope their value increases, relative to the fiat currency, and that it isn't being manipulated into underperformaning.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:15 | Link to Comment CB
CB's picture

it's fascinating to see an outlet like CNBC giving any time whatsoever to talk like this

don't recall them giving much serious consideration to this sort of thing before last year.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 17:00 | Link to Comment Harbourcity
Harbourcity's picture

It's fascinating that anyone (period) is fascinated by anthing those douches at CNBC do...

Sat, 10/03/2009 - 09:26 | Link to Comment Marge N Call
Marge N Call's picture

FATAL ERROR: Process Terminated

EXCEPTION 2009: [INFINITE RECURSION DETECTED] See stack trace for details.

This event eill be reported to uber_ops@skynet.net.

 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 12:56 | Link to Comment trader1
trader1's picture

Saw this also on JSMineset.com earlier this week. 

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:01 | Link to Comment Prophet of Wise
Prophet of Wise's picture

Only one solution remains....

"While you were dragging to your sacrificial altars the men of justice, of independence, of reason, of wealth, of self-esteem -- I beat you to it, I reached them first. I told them the nature of the game you were playing and the nature of that moral code of yours, which they had been too innocently generous to grasp. I showed them the way to live by another morality-mine. It is mine that they chose to follow.

All the men who have vanished, the men you hated, yet dreaded to lose, it is I who have taken them away from you. Do not attempt to find us. We do not choose to be found. Do not cry that it is our duty to serve you. We do not recognize such duty. Do not cry that you need us. We do not consider need a claim. Do not cry that you own us. You don't. Do not beg us to return. We are on strike, we, the men of the mind.

We are on strike against self-immolation. We are on strike against the creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties. We are on strike against the dogma that the pursuit of one's happiness is evil. We are on strike against the doctrine that life is guilt.

There is a difference between our strike and all those you've practiced for centuries: our strike consists, not of making demands, but of granting them. We are evil, according to your morality. We have chosen not to harm you any longer. We are useless, according to your economics. We have chosen not to exploit you any longer. We are dangerous and to be shackled, according to your politics. We have chosen not to endanger you, nor to wear the shackles any longer. We are only an illusion, according to your philosophy. We have chosen not to blind you any longer and have left you free to face reality -- the reality you wanted, the world as you see it now, a world without mind." -- John Galt, Atlas Shrugged 1957

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 13:43 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

"Inflation is what the Fed does best."

Now there's an understatement.

"If you had a nickel and three pennies in your hand that's the value of the dollar relative to 1913 when the Fed was created."

Yes, I think Mr. Rickards is correct that the only political way out of this mess (for the gov) is inflation, but it will wreck our economy big time.

Sat, 10/03/2009 - 09:30 | Link to Comment Marge N Call
Marge N Call's picture

Someone posted this a while back, it's worth repeating (paraphrased):

"In 1970 my Silver Dollar bought me about about 4 gallons of gasoline. In 2009 my Silver Dollar buys me about 4 gallons of gasoline." My paper dollar, on the other hand, buys me about 1/3 gallon of gasoline in 2009.

I'll take the Silver Dollars please.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 14:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 18:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 10/02/2009 - 23:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 01:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 11:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 20:59 | Link to Comment JR
JR's picture

Finally, someone has jumped right in to give us a clear solution to our problems.  And named them.  It’s Whining!  Whining! Whining! Whining!  If we could just stop whining, the skies would clear…

People with net worth are upset because there is no decent-return investment that is guaranteed to be secure against all present and future possibilities (including dollar devaluation, inflation, deflation, too-low interest rates, too-high interest rates, asset bubbles, asset collapses, yadda yadda yadda).” 

 

Congratulations!  You just described the Fed.

Sat, 10/03/2009 - 11:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 13:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 10/03/2009 - 13:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 10/04/2009 - 09:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 10/04/2009 - 23:11 | Link to Comment mkkby
mkkby's picture

I've put a lot of thought into this because I have savings to protect. In a devaluation event savings are trashed, as are lenders. Debtors get a free ride.

The US will NOT devalue quickly. I once thought so but it is impossible. Why? The Chinese would simply retaliate by confiscating US factories/property. Also, this would kill banks and be a huge gift to the typical over borrowed consumer. Therefore, the fed's only alternative is the slow death we have going on right now.

However if you still believe there will be a quick devaluation, your best store of value/defense is commodities. Also, borrow as much money as you can now because repaying it with inflated dollars would be a huge gift to you.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!