This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

House Passes Legislation To Somehow Revalue Chinese Yuan

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Just because somehow it is the Yuan's fault that America has exported its entire manufacturing industry over the past 30 years to lower cost countries, our idiot leaders have decided to take the next big step toward an all out trade war. The House of Idiot Representatives has approved legislation designed
to combat the manipulation of currency by China that results in
unfavorable trade conditions for the United States. As CNN reports, the
legislation, which authorizes the Commerce Department to impose duties
on imports from countries with undervalued currencies, passed by a vote
of 348 to 79. Somehow, because it was framed as a "jobs issue", everyone in Congress went full retard and confirmed they have not the first clue about how Economics actually works. But yes, please revalue the Yuan: the next thing will be exploding prices at Wal Mart, which have so far successfully masked the fact that the US has been exporting staple product inflation. We wonder how those same "workers" on whose behalf this law was allegedly passed will feel when their bill anywhere is double what it used to be... Not to mention that their currently unemployed status will certainly not have changed.

More from CNN:

"We can talk, or we can act. International trade is a high stakes, cut-throat business, and every time we simply talk, the other side acts, and every time they act, an American loses a job," said Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-California.

China said this year it would allow its currency, the renminbi, to trade in a wider range against the dollar. But the currency, also known as the yuan, has scarcely appreciated since then, inflaming critics who charge the undervalued renminbi helps steal U.S. manufacturing jobs.

The House vote caps years of frustration for lawmakers as the United States has continued to shed manufacturing jobs, and promises of reform from the Chinese have failed to result in policy changes.

The legislation now moves to the Senate. Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, says the body will act quickly to move the bill to the president's desk.

"We must take decisive action against China's currency manipulation and other economically injurious behavior," Schumer said on Tuesday, noting that the Senate will take up the issue when it reconvenes later this year.

"China is merely pretending to take significant steps on its currency," Schumer said. "This sucker's game is never going to stop unless we finally call their bluff."

But not every member of Congress is convinced, especially after China raised tariffs on U.S. poultry producers earlier this week and accused them of dumping product into the Chinese market.

Our question is what happens when 1.4 billion Chinese pass legislation that the Fed's QE is currency manipulation as well? Does that particular law go hand in hand with the one that states it is now illegal to hold US treasurys (because, of course, Congress realizes that when the dollar falls in value to the Yuan, all those Chinese-held USTs don't really increase in value...)

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:32 | 613879 Forbes
Forbes's picture

Because ZIRP is not manipulation...

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:38 | 613908 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

"our idiot leaders have decided to take the next big step toward an all out trade war..."

BRING

IT

ON!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:40 | 613913 knukles
knukles's picture

Legislation Ho!

Headline News

Law of Supply and Demand Repealed!

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 03:55 | 614900 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

Next up:  Congress considers repealing the Law of Gravity in order to get people "moving" again!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:59 | 613957 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

Really Tyler, what's all this bedwetting about rising staples?

I'll bet you're also in the "keep my tomatoes cheap" camp with regard to illegals.

You don't really give a damn about american workers do you globalist.

Sea level in the global wage arbitrage game is a modern feudalists' wet dream...Give it up Tyler..it aint gonna happen.

Manufacturing bitches.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:05 | 613985 Shameful
Shameful's picture

ROTFLOL!!!  That's so cute you think this will bring jobs back.  Well I was a small child at the time but remember a little something something called NAFTA? So where are those manufacturers going to go, the realm of high wages and infinite regulation (health care anyone?) and bureaucracy or maybe build up in Mexico.

There should be a cheer coming from Mexico.  This keeps up they won't need amnesty we'll just move everything down there to them...man I need to learn some Spanish!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:26 | 614033 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

THIS bring jobs back?? No.

But for the right reasons or the wrong it could be a start....

NAFTA? What's that got to do with it?

The whole global wage arbitrage regime is a scam of parasitic global elites perpetrated on Mankind. NAFTA was the 1st major salvo fired at Americans.

I know your kind, (apt screen name).

Pliant slaves, NO regs, grinding poverty, cheap, shoddy and dangerous, rivers of pollution, oceans of waste, strip mining, the Company store, child labor, happy armed forces recruiters, Potterville, the whole "nasty, brutish and short" nine yards.

 Never had you pegged as a self exalted bitch till now....Shameful

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:51 | 614084 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

Keep spiting vile without understanding what exactly is going on. This is the on set of hyperinflation. We will have less imports coming to this country in short order and with no manufacturing industry in this country prices for everything will sky rocket. 

Welcome to Keynesian hell.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:11 | 614125 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

It's coming anyway dumbass...

Bring    It    On!

America FIRST.

Fuck all the globalists and political partisans of ZeroHedge

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:26 | 614290 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

Take it easy. Here, have some Obama Bread(TM).

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:43 | 614325 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

Have some W dick...

put on yer bifocals and LOOK at the avatar

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 01:04 | 614679 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

Spotted dick. No thanks.

20/20 vision here. Your avatar can jump off the bridge I want to sell you.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 02:23 | 614767 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

pffft..too deep republican gramps

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:00 | 614242 hardmedicine
hardmedicine's picture

"we will have less imports coming to this country in short order..........prices for everything will sky rocket"

 

how about not being able to get it AT ALL.  I've had a back order for some dental supplies for going on 2 months now.... something that is vital!!  and without which I cannot operate.  last year it was a key anesthetic used for complex surgeries...... I tell you I am going back to research that "most favored nation status"  given out about 15 years ago.  That and NAFTA and GATT..... all of it should be impeachable offenses for having voted in favor!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 22:26 | 614396 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

anesthetic?? we talkin bout anesthetics??

 

just show them their portfolio and watch them passout

 

 

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 01:48 | 614736 SoCalBusted
SoCalBusted's picture

Even in basic retail, don't you notice that there are more "empty pegs" - stock outs?  How about the rearranged floor plans? - wider aisles and a sparser assortment of product.  Retail has cranked their inventory way back and are only making bets on the high turnover, "A" items.

You can have any color you want as long as it is black.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 10:14 | 615324 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

Good. At some point we'll start making it here again.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:08 | 614123 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Yeah I'm for no regs, have they ever worked?  The simple fact is all regulators will be captured, or at least the reg system.  There is a TON of regs in banking did that help, nope.  Ton of regs in finance did that help, nope.  All regs do is allow the illusion of safety and a fair playing field.  The world we live in is unfair, and we have to treat it as such.  There is no utopia where people get high wages cheap goods clean environment and live in paradise.  The closest to was America post WW2 and that was because the rest of the world was a smoldering husk.

And how did you draw the company store model out of my statement in particular?

I'm for people being free to do what they wish with their labor and not having to oblige some strong man, and the company store system is directly against that.  If you think the tyranny of the state can be used for the common good, good luck with that.  The state you empower to protect you will be the state that enslaves you.

Also funny that I point out that NAFTA is killing us and you immediately think I'm for it.  But by all means relish in your victory of the Congress trying to bring inflation back home, because this sure won't bring jobs back.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:29 | 614180 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

"Yeah I'm for no regs, have they ever worked?"

Republican boilerplate. Corporate propaganda.

"There is a TON of regs in banking did that help?"

Regs are meaningless without men of integrity to enforce them.

Amerika is now a riddled corpse of corruption and embezlement...This too shall pass....in the fire to come.

Regs and LAWS come into being because at some point in time someone scammed, lied, cheated, defrauded or otherwise committed acts deleterious to the common good. Are there excessive regs on the national books? YES. Even, "Hell YES".

You want to live in a world with no regs? Move to Somalia. It's a Libertarian paradise by your lights.

"The world we live in is unfair, and we have to treat it as such."

THIS is the ethos that has brought america to its present pass.

"There is no utopia where people get high wages cheap goods clean environment and live in paradise."

You just gave it all away there Sparky. Your "Realist's" Dream. Complete bullshit of course....

"because this sure won't bring jobs back."

But they WILL come back.....the Hard way or the Harder...but they will. Don't bet the farm on your dream Shameful, it'll be burned to the ground.



Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:55 | 614234 Shameful
Shameful's picture

So where will these men of integrity come from and where have they been for the last 50 years?  That's one hell of a coffee break.

Oh under a totalitarian regime jobs will be plentiful, but prosperity will be in short supply.  After all not to much unemployment under Stalinist Russia, and Mussolini made the trains run on time, heck I'm pretty sure people work hard in NKorea trying to scratch out a living.  Have your dreams that with the right rules and Angels from Heaven to support them that the nature of man will change.

And if mine is a realist dream can you point to a real world example of this utopia you speak of.  It need not even exist today feel free to pull it form the pages of history.  And my dream?  I have no belief whatsoever that we will live in a free society.  Far to many love tyranny.  They may rail against it when it harms them but in their hearts they dream to be it's master.  Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

You will not address my points with anything but bile and derision, not facts or reasoning.  You look for a society run by men dominating other men, but expect them to have integrity.  Power corrupts, so unless every man in charge is a saint and remains a saint the system will just turn into what we have now or worse. I can tell that hte idea of a man keeping his own work and making a decision for himself is anathema to you.  Good luck sir. And Might I suggest you join up with the Alphabet Soup, surely a man of your "integrity" can show the way.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:47 | 614543 merehuman
merehuman's picture

nobody can be as dumb as you pretend to be, bananaman

Your thinking is wishful. I wish too things would straighten.

It will get much, much worse and i am so sure of that i have sold truck and equipment and downsized myself to where i can hardly be found. 

best you research some more and leave the emotional (Americafirstuberalles) content out of it. have a grand eve

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 02:17 | 614751 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

I'm obviously a mirror then>

I never said things were gonna be peachy. YOU projected that bit.... My own view is that we are heading for a collapse, a reset, a much NEEDED reset...The kind that enveloped our grandparents 80 years ago....a point at which americans can finally SEE the extent to which they've been SOLD OUT, get "wise" and hopefully get back to 1st principles again.

As to "America First"...Globalization is the pipedream. 

You wanna see True despotism, deep, wide and eternal...keep working for that "One World" singularity. It's just as batshit crazy as when the hippies had a hold of it....only in the hands of the Right it would take on the guise of global Fascism.

How many of you here see yourselves as Ubermen, the "managers" of a brave new feudalism to come? "At least I'LL get paid", isn't that the way it works? that Wall Street ethos ....or have you simply been brainwashed by the people for whom this is much more likely to be a Reality?

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 04:01 | 614906 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

Remember, rulers have no right to do anything that you have no right to do on
your own.  If you shouldn't do it, you shouldn't ask others to do it for you.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 09:51 | 615285 rwe2late
rwe2late's picture

 Yeah I'm for no regs, have they ever worked?  ... All regs do is allow the illusion of safety and a fair playing field. - Shameful

 

 Unless you are a complete anarchist. your statement is misleading and inherently self-contradictory.

There are regulations (laws) regarding child labor, worker safety, food processing, disposal of wastes, contract fraud, private property, taxation, business incorporation, patents, liability, etc. and etc.

Do you wish to abolish them all?

 

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 14:46 | 616211 tmosley
tmosley's picture

You don't have to be an anarchist to want to repeal all those things.

Private property exists whether the government recognizes it or not.

All that other crap is just that, crap.  We didn't have most of it prior to 1900, and the US THRIVED.  Now we've got it all (minus the private property), and we are being smothered.

Things like child labor disappeared on their own decades prior to their being made illegal, and now those laws are used to stop teenagers from working.  What is wrong with a 14 year old having a part time job?  Why is it alright for a 16 year old to have a part time job?  Worker safety is also something that comes about naturally, and without regulations.  Look at China.  The workers got pissed off, and now their conditions are improving.  This is how things work.  You can't just point a gun at someone and say "You have to live without the wages your child brings in".  The children had to work until society saved enough capital that they didn't have to.

Fri, 10/01/2010 - 02:47 | 617593 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

what a goddamned fool you are Tmosley

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:36 | 614314 undereducated
Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:23 | 614164 knukles
knukles's picture

(Read with imaginary high kinda squeakie voice, like Ross Perot's)

Fuuuupppshhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Hear that sound?  Ya'll hear that big suckin' sound?  It's American jobs going overseas.  Now listen, I'm a talkin'.  Shut up.  Yer' not listen-en to me.  Shut up.  I'm all ears.  That's NAFTA.

Fuuuuuupppshhhhhhhhhhh.  

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:44 | 614213 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Perot was famous for his charts -- and he's still doing them.

Damn nice ones and current.

http://perotcharts.com/

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:30 | 614253 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

In addition, there is nothing FREE about NAFTA.

I did a quote for a supplier that was selling product to an American auto maker in Mexico. He told me there would be a 17% tariff on my machinery if he bought it and put it in the factory. I said to him: "What about NAFTA?" He shrugged his shoulders and said our product is taxed at the border. Yours will be too!

We are getting fucked so hard we will never walk straight again. Bastards never even gestured the courtesy reach-around.. :)

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 03:22 | 614866 bigkahuna
bigkahuna's picture

Thanx Rocky. These charts do a good job of illustrating how lopsided the tax situation is. "Beggar thy neighbor" is not simply a Euro or world phenomena - we are beggaring each other on our own block. 'Round here lets call it "buggar thy neighbor".

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:05 | 614115 SimpleSimon
SimpleSimon's picture

When tomatoes go to $10 per pound, it will help the unemployed and the poor put food on the table for their families.  Basic economics can not ignore comparative advantages.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:21 | 614158 1100-TACTICAL-12
1100-TACTICAL-12's picture

I will quadruple my tomato planting this spring. Now is the time to spray roundup, on those pretty green lawns & start workin that dirt.....

Gardening Bitches....

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:30 | 614184 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

whooop!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:50 | 614553 merehuman
merehuman's picture

Starting your garden with poison? Ah , i forgot, its the american way.

Dumm and dummer.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:54 | 614231 perchprism
Wed, 09/29/2010 - 22:44 | 614414 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

Dems haven't, smoot has too many letters.  Joe-Bite-Me knows that what we need is a three letter word J O B S.

yep, here we go again.

And raising taxes too, that'll work.

- Ned

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:02 | 614422 Lord and Master
Lord and Master's picture

NO, DOG SHiiT.

Schumer's a slick cunnt and knows full well EXACTLY what hes doing.  He sees the economic/ fiscal situation in the US falling apart, and they are striking out at China because they feel the searing heat of whats coming over the next 18 months, and they know they will need that common enemy real bad.  This is a cokksucker's legislation-- any self-respecting country doesnt give a fcuk who pegs to it's currency.  If China wants to bitch out and peg thats there prerogative.  When you are a strong and self-respecting nation, you produce and , export and import with no regard for other nations' currencies.  If the import is too expensive you dont buy it.  If they dont wanna pay the price of your export you dont sell it.  ANY INVOLVEMENT IN THE CURRENCY OF ANOTHER NATION IN THE MANNER OF THIS LEGISLATION SHOULD BE A VERY VERY BIG RED FLAG TO THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA THAT THE C***SUCKERS THEY WERE FOOLISH ENOUGH TO ELECT FEEL THE HEAT OF THE DOMESTIC ECONOMIC PROBLEMS THAT ARE COMING.  THEY ARE NOW ANTAGONIZING ANOTHER NATION PURELY TO DISTRACT FROM THE RUIN THAT THEIR MISDEEDS AND INCOMPETENCE HAVE AND WILL INCREASINGLY BRING.  Schumer: "China's manipulation of their currency is the boot on the neck of the American people."  Me:  "No, Bitch, yours is the boot on the neck of the American people!" ... SCHUMER FEELS THE HEAT AND HIS FLINGING OFF A NON-SENSICAL-IN-ALMOST-EVERY-WAY PIECE OF LEGISLATION TO PRESERVE HIS POWER, PERIOD.  This stuff would only pass as acceptable among a nation of morons.  Either way, BIG BIG red flag.  Rocky Raccoons got a post below from Yardeni about the stimulus-pushers jumping ship.  Chuck is damning the torpedoes prancing up to the bow and stepping up the charge against the chinese and at the same time all of america.

"a sucker's game which will only stop when we call THEIR bluff" indeed!

 

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:07 | 614465 hedgeless_horseman
hedgeless_horseman's picture

flag as vehement (1)

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:11 | 614473 Lord and Master
Lord and Master's picture

wait, can i not be vehement?  or is that a joke

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:22 | 614503 hedgeless_horseman
hedgeless_horseman's picture

A compliment, friend.  You can be whatever you want as far as I am concerned.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:31 | 614513 Virginian
Virginian's picture

More vehemence, Bitchez!  Your rant was highly cathartic, thank you.  Right up there with one of my favorite scenes from Animal House:

 

Blutto:  "When the going gets tough....................................................................................................

...........the tough get going!  Now, who's with me?"

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 00:09 | 614591 Clayton Bigsby
Clayton Bigsby's picture

"Did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?!"

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:46 | 614540 Hansel
Hansel's picture

+10, f'n warmongers.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 01:36 | 614719 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

Jump on the Hansel-train.

I stand all amazed.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 01:39 | 614723 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

No, really, that post was pure water down my throat. Please. Please. Please.

Continue.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 00:08 | 614589 Clayton Bigsby
Clayton Bigsby's picture

I like it!  Schumer needs to get fucked with Shaq's dick.  He is an ass-monkey cock-eating shitstain cumlunch gutter sperm burping gutter whore fuckbucket asslunch with herpes on his face and barkney frank's dick in his mealy little mouth - that cuntshitstainfuckhole!!!"

or, something like that... :-)

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 00:46 | 614644 SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

It's so weird.  I was thinking the exact same thing.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 02:50 | 614812 Lord and Master
Lord and Master's picture

yeah then theres fuckin barkney...

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 03:05 | 614841 Lord and Master
Lord and Master's picture

yeah i mean its over-the-top totally nonsensical stuff they are firing up.... "china must be punished and forced to revalue their currency! it is the boot on the neck of the american recovery! its not really anything In america! .... CHINA!.... BOOT!!!!!... on our necks, i tell you!! .......AAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!...

to schumer, et al-- like gimme a goddamned break for ONE fucking second guys!!! come on man .... like this is amazing amazing stuff.....

One thing everyone should watch out for is big chutzpah... bernankes gonna do it... theres a guy who will show madman-like chutzpah.... same with schumer apparently.... you think you are going to take chuck out of power, do you think chuckie is gonna step down when the country collapses, because he was intimately involved by virtue of being a senior senator from nY.... chuckie has the answer.... its a brilliant one.... the Boot of CHina!  the rhetoric is like something from 100 years ago or something... next chuckie is going to be saying america must "SPEAK SOFTLY AND CARRY A BIG STICK."  boot of china... like everything else... just way too dumb to work for very long... im TELLING you this shits too dumb to work out in any way nearly as successful as theyd like... im sorry... i know crony capitalism and democratic politics doesnt have much to do with intelligence etc, much less rocket science etc..... but im sorry this shits too dumb, its too dumb and its gay... boot of china on necks of americans.... thats like a fuckin 1930s phrase or some shit... from street scenes in chuckie's childhood on the streets of tin pan alley in nYC... "get ur boot off that poor lad's neck you hellion!"...

 

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 03:44 | 614889 bigkahuna
bigkahuna's picture

This type of rhetoric...."boot of the (insert identifier) on the (insert the manipulated) people/economy ..." etc --- has been used specifically by old racists (hitler types) and contemporary hate groups to stir up emotions of their followers.

It has not been used effectively for more than seventy years - thats why it sounds like a throw-back.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 11:54 | 615622 Lord and Master
Lord and Master's picture

it wont be used effectively in the intermediate to long run now... reason?  simple enough-- it sounds like a throwback and the people who are putting out rhetoric that sounds like a throwback dont realize how it sounds... so its a symptom of kind of being psychologically disconnected in an important way... the policies/ actions of people who are psychologically disconnected WILL BE OVERRULED by more psychologically connected people and their policies/ actions... more to the point:  hot bitches will be like "ehhh i dont like that", and as stupid as that may sound, it is huge when you want the general population on board with something... 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:32 | 613880 LePetomane
LePetomane's picture

Hyperinflation, bitchez!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:36 | 613886 Racer
Racer's picture

US says, we want, we want, we want, we want, we want, we want, we no pay, we no pay, here give credit card.....

China sells cheap wanted goods to US

China buys US treas..

 

US says we can't afford cheap goods.. put the price up

China says..

Here, is a book of Inverse Sun Tzu for Dummies...the really uneducated morons edition

ROFLMAO ...go take a hike sucker.....

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 22:46 | 614421 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

know your  enemy, know yourself, in 100 battles you will never be in peril.

- Ned

(Griffith translation was his PhD. Thesis at Oxford in... NOT ECONOMICS!)

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:34 | 613887 The Rogue Trader
The Rogue Trader's picture

The term "asstards" comes to mind....not sure why...

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:35 | 613892 Raymond K Hassel
Raymond K Hassel's picture

Hoot-Smalley, bitchez

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:19 | 614013 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

Exactly.

The USA 'forcing' a revaluation of another country's currency...
BWAAAAAaaaahahahahahahahah!!!

Go ahead, send in the US military and see how far that gets 'em.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:27 | 614177 cossack55
cossack55's picture

At an average expenditure of 436 rounds (all calibers) per kill, let's see, 436 x 1.4 billion =  ...  Oops. My calculator doesn't go that high.  I see a shortage of .223 at Walmart soon.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:46 | 614217 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

I see a shortage of .223 at Walmart soon.

I do my part when in the neighborhood.  My Mini-14 loves 'em.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:35 | 613894 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

and every time they act, an American loses a job

... and then they kill a puppy, I suppose.

No. "Acts of job loss" would be General Motors exporting production jobs to China to boost the bottom line. Even Henry Ford knew better than this.

Everyone in government is set to become demagogues. Race to the gutter, running over orphans and grandmas in the process. This is what "end of empire" looks like folks. Devoid of logic, immoral and insane.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:20 | 614024 Ricky Bobby
Ricky Bobby's picture

"This is what "end of empire" looks like folks" Spot On!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:11 | 614127 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

+1

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:37 | 614058 Bob
Bob's picture

Exactly.  Dickwads!  Really, those jobs will come back?

If that ship hadn't already sailed on its one-way journey so long ago--financed, built and operated by the congressional-corporate complex of the USA--this might make some sense.  But really.  What a lurid joke now. 

Now we ask for further consequences.  This kind of shit worked when we were the rich kid--everybody wanted to play our games, laugh at our jokes, follow us around, etc.; seems that now that Daddy's broke, the fat kid without toys has no clue that he's a domineering bore who nobody really likes.  It isn't just the Chinese.  The entire world feels that way. 

This is gonna get so ugly. 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:02 | 614245 thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

Democracy has always been about demagoguery. Read Mencken's Notes on Democracy and dispel your ignorance.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:35 | 613895 trav7777
trav7777's picture

what the fuck is the problem with trade war?  When faced with a mercantilist ponzi, this sort of thing is inevitable.

EVERYthing the economists tell us about the cause of the Depression was wrong, why should we fucking believe Smoot-Hawley protectionism was a cause?

GFD, China is wantonly protectionist as is Japan.  Maybe we should just buy yuan.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:01 | 613973 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

+ plus

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:20 | 614020 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Maybe you should move to North Korea if you like protectionism so much?

Free trade does no evil.  It merely lays bare the evils of domestic policy.  Trade barriers do nothing but make a prison out of the nation that imposes them.

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:57 | 614083 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

Maybe you should move to the interior of my anal cavity Tbitch.

We don't HAVE "Free Trade™" or "Fair Trade" any more than we have "Free Markets"...We have a global race to the bottom.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:56 | 614559 merehuman
merehuman's picture

You still got room in  your anal cavity? I need a place to park my car

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 00:30 | 614624 Clayton Bigsby
Clayton Bigsby's picture

fuckin awesome.  well played, sir.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 02:35 | 614779 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

I thought you were still taking the bus...

well, you'll have to ask Tmos...

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:09 | 614102 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Maybe you should move to North Korea if you like protectionism so much?

Free trade does no evil.

Maybe you should try to sell a web press into mainland China from the good old USA, that will cost you a 40% mark up'... Free ~ Trade, are you mad?

*UPDATE ~ They do this to force you into entering a *partnership* with them, nike,cat, ect.... for the right to sell goods into China you must build it their.Or you get hammered with tariffs.


Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:44 | 614274 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

2 junks for the Truth??

 


Wed, 09/29/2010 - 22:04 | 614364 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Who cares?  If they have an environment that is oppressive towards business, I won't open a business there.  You never here Americans bitching about how unfair the trade practices or Cambodia are.  Why is that?  Because their crappy economic policies have made them pariahs for international business, and stunted their own growth!

The problem here is that certain people have penis envy.  They see China's big export led trade dick, and they try to cover up the fact that our own formerly massive export-led has been obliterated by our fast food diet of excessive government regulation, which has caused our governments waistline to grow from 2% of GDP to 40%.

It's not China's fault that we are losing jobs.  If it was just a matter of cheap labor, then Africa would have taken over all world production decades ago.  No, it is a matter of government bloat.  Our government spends twice as much as China's as a percent of GDP, and even less per capita.  They are frugal, and we are spendthrifts.  THAT is the cause of our decline, NOT this DEYTUKRJBS fantasy.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 23:50 | 614552 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

It's not China's fault that we are losing jobs.  If it was just a matter of cheap labor, then Africa would have taken over all world production decades ago.

 

Classic Stupidity', Wow.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 09:04 | 615197 spartan117
spartan117's picture

Yes, attack the poster without any rhyme or reason as to why his position was "stupid".  Your debating skills are stellar.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:56 | 614351 Quantum Noise
Quantum Noise's picture

Where the fuck did you see free trade with China? Free trade implies intellectual property rights, free economies, and above all, free people.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:26 | 614173 1100-TACTICAL-12
1100-TACTICAL-12's picture

Might as well, these incompetent, bought & paid for motherfuckers running the show, ain't going to do nothing but keep digging the hole....

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:06 | 614252 thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

Trade war inevitably leads to military war; the loser (in this case, America) inexorably resorts to using his guns.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 22:48 | 614426 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

Trav, Milton and Anna were economists and, well, weren't wrong. - Ned

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:37 | 613901 jmc8888
jmc8888's picture

Woo hoo, we just told the Chinese our rigging is better than yours.  Except, they weren't rigging it.

They just didn't start rigging themselves like we did....i.e. float their currency.

We shouldn't of either. 

So instead of asking them to float, we should get the world to PEG.  Bretton Woods style. 

Or continue to look like idiots that cannot be reasoned with to the Chinese.  Probably too late on that one though.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:43 | 614075 Bob
Bob's picture

Or continue to look like idiots that cannot be reasoned with to the Chinese.  Probably too late on that one though.

We're clearly determined to stay the course on this.  It will play here on the home field as Yankee spirit and backbone. 

So clueless. 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:37 | 613902 H. Perowne
H. Perowne's picture

Man, somehow this seems so familiar. Country in the midst of a massive economic downturn made worse by imbecilic fiscal policy, increasing foreign tensions, and now an incendiary piece of legislation which threatens to touch off a powder keg . . .

It's on the tip of my tongue . . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot-Hawley_Tariff_Act

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:37 | 613904 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

"China is merely pretending to take significant steps on its currency," Schumer said. "This sucker's game is never going to stop unless we finally call their bluff."

 

Seriously, how can he be this dumb?

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:47 | 613938 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Not dumb. Tough! Tough-talk for the cheese-doodle crowd glued to the nightly news. Grrr! See? Me tough! Argh!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:55 | 613962 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Grrrr!  I'm a tiger!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:38 | 613909 Azwethinkweiz
Azwethinkweiz's picture

Full retard bitchez

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:46 | 613931 LePetomane
LePetomane's picture

Excellent.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 00:32 | 614626 Clayton Bigsby
Clayton Bigsby's picture

is that the hoff?

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:45 | 613910 Nihilarian
Nihilarian's picture

Too late, CAT already building more plants in China. See, the thing is, currency war at this point is moot, since there's nothing that China would buy from the USA.

The only reason China is not depegging on its own, is b/c it wants to continue its own frenzied/ponzi'ed growth scheme not too dissimilar from Brazil/Petrobras, with America being the middle man to allow China to buy from itself.

The sooner Hugh Hendry's predictions come true, the sooner Gonzalo Lira's predictions will come true, and the sooner this Keynesian catastrophe will end.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:02 | 613980 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

fuck CAT

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:23 | 614028 Id fight Gandhi
Id fight Gandhi's picture

I agree!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:14 | 614138 -1Delta
-1Delta's picture

CAT is full retard

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:22 | 614280 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

full greedtard...oh well, tis but a Chinese lure....

"Please to leave blueprints on table..."

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:46 | 613916 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

How the hell did we elect these people?  Oh yeah, we didn't, "DIEBOLD" did.  Congressionals are stupider and crazier than your average American, and that is saying a lot!  Sorry average American, sorry to bring you into this, but you are leaving those who go full retard to dictate your fate.  Oh, and in reality, this whole full retard thing, it is more like covertly (sometimes not) psych manipulation MK style on these dudes.  Check out Bob who obviously had just come from his weekly goat sacrifice.

Congressman Bob Etheridge (D-NC) Assaults Student on Washington Sidewalk:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oqIP9yagkQ

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:25 | 614074 FASB 666
FASB 666's picture

People Against Goodness And Normalcy

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT_QRKfv8H4&feature=related

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:30 | 614301 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

LOL

Poor goats. If only they knew they are essentially training wheels.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:42 | 613918 Chemba
Chemba's picture

Total fuking ignorant retards in Washington D.C.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:58 | 613966 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

Thats the first thing you have said that i'd agree to.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:42 | 613919 jippie
jippie's picture

Best commentary on this debate I've read so far from

China Bashing in High Gear Again
It began with a NYT editorial by Paul Krugman, who appears to have a number of hobby horses that occupy most of his efforts – demanding more deficit spending, more money printing, raising taxes and bashing China for currency manipulation.

Now, don't get us wrong – we also tend to think that China's exchange rate policies are harmful – alas, they are mostly harmful for China.

Krugman asserts that the yuan's exchange rate would increase if it were allowed to float as though that were an incontestable given (he does not explicitly demand a floating, fully convertible yuan however – he just wants China to keep 'manipulating' it, albeit in an upward direction):

If discussion of Chinese currency policy seems confusing, it’s only because many people don’t want to face up to the stark, simple reality — namely, that China is deliberately keeping its currency artificially weak.

How do we know whether the yuan is 'artificially weak'? As a matter of fact, we do not know that, and there are many arguments in favor of the yuan weakening if it were allowed to float. ....

In addition to these considerations, think about the fact that China's citizens had to live with a closed capital account for an eternity. How would they react if it were to be opened? We tend to think that citizens with large savings who have heretofore been forced to invest those savings within China – a major force in driving China's real estate bubble to absurd heights – would begin to divert a lot of capital to investments abroad. While we can not be certain how big a flood of money would leave China in the event, it's a good bet the markets are not prepared for it. The consensus is after all congruent with Krugman's assertion that the yuan is too weak.

Let us however step back for a moment from this discussion and for argument's sake accept the notion that the yuan's exchange rate is too low and would rise if left to float. How can that harm the US? Krugman asserts that a trade deficit is 'negative', but why should that be so? Trade is after all a voluntary economic activity. When people engage in trade, they do so because both parties to the trade deem it to their economic advantage. It follows that there can be nothing 'negative' about this. China's merchants wouldn't sell their goods for dollars if they did not prefer these dollars over their merchandise, and conversely US consumers would not trade their dollars for Chinese merchandise if they thought the trade harmful to their economic well-being. Just because there is a national border between these sets of traders this basic economic fact is not magically suspended. If trade deficits were worth worrying about, why not also worry about the trade deficit between, say, New York and Philadelphia?

The fact that Krugman does not even mention this basic facet of trade anywhere in his articles is tantamount to a red alert. Frederic Bastiat lampooned protectionism back in 1845 when he penned his 'Petition of the Candle Makers'. The candle makers are incensed that the light of the sun can be had for free. The sun's 'unfair trade advantage' surely needs to be curtailed somehow!

We are suffering from the ruinous competition of a rival who apparently works under conditions so far superior to our own for the production of light that he is flooding the domestic market with it at an incredibly low price; for the moment he appears, our sales cease, all the consumers turn to him, and a branch of French industry whose ramifications are innumerable is all at once reduced to complete stagnation. This rival, which is none other than the sun, is waging war on us so mercilessly we suspect he is being stirred up against us by perfidious Albion (excellent diplomacy nowadays!), particularly because he has for that haughty island a respect that he does not show for us.”

Replace 'perfidious Albion' with China, and you have Krugman. Krugman makes the same mistake he always makes – the one mark of a truly bad economist if you will – he neglects the 'unseen' effects of his policy advice. It may well be true that a small group of domestic producers would benefit from a higher yuan (which ones? We're not quite sure, actually…). Alas, every single consumer would suffer for their betterment by having to pay higher prices. This in turn means that consumers will either have to cut back on their consumption, or lower their rate of saving. It seems obvious that this entails a lower standard of living for everyone but the favored few. Since less money will be available for either consumption or saving, there will also be less money available for investment. Capital formation is thus likely to slow, further impinging on future growth.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:10 | 613997 Bananamerican
Bananamerican's picture

"Trade is after all a voluntary economic activity"

So is freebasing.

 So is the slave trade...as long as you're the slave trader

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:23 | 614030 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Great!  Let's turn the US into a prison!

Hi there, Mr. Obama.  How's Michelle?

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:39 | 614065 LePetomane
LePetomane's picture

Too late.  The US has the most jailed per capita in the world.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 07:03 | 615016 docj
docj's picture

After having read through this thread (slow morning) it's my considered opinion that this is parody.

Nobody could be this stupid unless it's on purpose.

You may now continue with your regularly scheduled "JUNK" parade.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:43 | 613921 Mr.Kowalski
Mr.Kowalski's picture

Nice.. I think I'll just head over to my bank tomorrow morning, walk over to my banker, and b!tchslap him with my spilling, iron coffee cup. That'll teach him to loan me money ata ridiculously low interest rate.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:46 | 613936 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Yeah but the question is, does your mug say, "Gold, bitchez!"

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:16 | 614147 -1Delta
-1Delta's picture

No mine says KCA <cmdy> go lol

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:44 | 613923 cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Going forward, I'm just going to mentally end every statement by a Congress-critter with "... so I can get reelected in November."

"We must take decisive action against China's currency manipulation and other economically injurious behavior ... so I can get reelected in November" Schumer said on Tuesday.

See? Doesn't that help a lot?

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:19 | 614015 Kali
Kali's picture

Word

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:30 | 614045 -Michelle-
-Michelle-'s picture

It all makes sense now.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 04:14 | 614915 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

Blindingly BRILLIANT!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:49 | 613937 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture
The politics of Chinese adjustment

China can raise the value of the renminbi. An undervalued currency affects the domestic and trade imbalances by shifting income from households (who are net importers) to net exporters.  This automatically increases the gap between what is domestically produced and what is domestically consumed, and so expands the trade surplus.  By increasing savings (savings is equal to production minus consumption), an undervalued exchange rate increases the excess of savings over investment, which is by definition equal to the current account surplus.

By revaluing the currency, Beijing reverses this transfer and helps rebalance the economy.  So who benefits?

Clearly households in the aggregate, as consumers, benefit because the reduction in import prices implies a real increase in their income.  The greater the import component as a share of income, the greater the real increase in income.  My guess is that middle and lower middle classes benefit most since the very poor (especially the rural poor) are likely to have a relatively low import component in their consumption, and the rich consume a very low share of their total income.

A second group of winners includes companies that sell imported goods (for example large retailers) and companies that otherwise benefit from an increase in domestic consumption but who don’t have an important export market.  This includes most importantly the labor-intensive service industries.

The losers are, first and most obviously, the export sector, who will see a rise in their costs relative to their revenues, and second, if these rising costs lead to bankruptcies, households to the extent that they are employees of the export companies.  Part of the rise in unemployment in the export sector will be mitigated as new workers will in fact be employed by the winning industries, but a rapid rise in the currency could cause unemployment in the export sector to rise faster than employment in the other sectors, and so any change in household income could itself be constrained or even negative.

This, of course, is the big problem China faces.  By now nearly everyone recognizes that raising the value of the renminbi is a necessary part of the process of raising the real value of household income and improving the balance between producers and consumers, but if the currency rises too quickly and so leads to rising unemployment, it will actually cause household income (and with it household consumption) to decline as unemployment rises.  The imbalance will still improve, but it will improve in the “wrong” way, in the form of production declining faster than consumption.

Finally any entity that is long dollars and short renminbi will lose.  The most obvious example is the PBoC, which loses greatly from revaluation.  Investors who have stockpiled significant amounts of commodities funded by renminbi borrowing will also lose.

Michael Pettis

http://mpettis.com/2010/09/the-politics-of-chinese-adjustment/

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:48 | 613941 Kali
Kali's picture

Just another source of madness.  I think they are losing control, this will be the distraction to keep people from burning down the Capitol/al  : )

Wow, is global war on the doorstep?

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:08 | 613965 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Wow, is global war on the doorstep?


 

A quick look over your shoulder at recent history would tell you the answer is yes. Now think about all the morons drunk on debt in the US. Is it really hard to imagine a crazy man winning the vote in the future, running a campain on "return to glory" at any cost.

22 year old kids can fly waves of drones into china,iran from kansas, while eating donuts, like they did on playstation3 and bombs away with no remorse. All in the name of ,entitlement.IE~ dibs,be in line for,comeuppance,deserts,privilege,rights,vengeance, what is coming to one.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:52 | 614086 Kali
Kali's picture

"crazy man", or woman.  Dose wimmen like Palin, Bachmann and that new tea party chic out east are plenny crazy for me.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:58 | 614219 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

 

 

Ya something like this fucking wacko- ...Koo Koo..Koo..Koo..Bing,Bing,Bing, Koo..Koo

Phil Davison, GOP candidate ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7XwV_h9wWM&feature=related

 

 

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:09 | 614255 Kali
Kali's picture

This guy had me laughing for days.  Haven't seen this version of it.  The thing that scares me is I'm seeing this same kinda behavior in the gen pub.  Everyone/everything is spiraling outta control!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:15 | 614265 thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

Petraeus. Not crazy.

1) Replaced McChrystal.

2) "Succeeded" in Iraq.

3 Will soon "succeed" in Afghanistan.

American people will love him. He is "pure," a military man, probably Christian. Unable to be bribed. The Tea Party will love him. LOL.

Geopol is correct; he is our next president.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:50 | 613947 geopol
geopol's picture

These are the probabilities that are consuming Tim..

The Chinese currency reserves could also be used internationally. The Chinese have been intensely focused on Africa as a source of raw materials for their future growth. Beijing would therefore be well advised to solidify its position in Africa by launching an ambitious Marshall Plan for that continent in the form of comprehensive infrastructural, agricultural, and industrial development. This could involve the creation of a Sino-African Development Bank from which many states could benefit. In effect, the Chinese could offer the Africans an alternative to the hated and discredited policies of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which could not survive a competitor that would respect national sovereignty and offer the Africans equitable terms.

The result would be a new African market for Chinese exports, mainly in the area of modern capital goods. Until this is done, the Chinese will have a very hard time escaping their excessive reliance on the US consumer market and U.S. Treasury paper.

As for Geithner, he had better come home and start working on his federal income tax return due April 15, since we know how much trouble he has had with paying his taxes in the recent past.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:54 | 613959 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Africa unite!  'Cause we are moving right out of Babylon!

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 00:42 | 614638 Clayton Bigsby
Clayton Bigsby's picture

"Viva Nepal!"

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:10 | 613995 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Africa is China's future.  That writing has been on the wall for a long time.  The Anglo-American establishment has helped make sure all those goodies have been unharvested, and China is of course sniffing around for untapped resources.  It won't be good for the average African.  If China plays it smart and ruthless they will just buy off dictators and strip the resources out to boost their economy.  Africa will not be a destination for goods, for that they would still be looking elsewhere.  However should a war start they would be able to direct excess capacity and African resources to a mobilized war economy.

I see you can post pics, so when can we expect to see articles here?  I love reading about your analysis of geo-politics even if I vehemently disagree with your economic policies.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:09 | 614101 geopol
geopol's picture

Hi Shameful,

That writing has been on the wall for a long time. 

 As it is history of sorts..not relevant??

I don't believe John Perkins will play a role in this scenario or Chas T. Main..

China has us buy the balls,,,it won't work,,in simple terms..When asked by Kissinger what he thought about the French revolution,, He responded  "It's early to asses.. They are patient...

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:42 | 614210 Shameful
Shameful's picture

I'm not sure I get what you are saying.  I was not thinking along the lines of a John Perkins soft takeover.  I was thinking more direct pay off of petty dictators and warlords and moving Han Chinese to Africa.  I'm an amateur student of history and the Han Chinese get around, so wound not be surprised if a portion of them settled Africa.  The Anglo power in Africa will wane, the Chinese will offer at least a degree of improvement.  Even just providing resource extraction jobs will improve the lot of many Africans, but I doubt they will be provide the tools to truly lift themselves out of poverty.

Totally agree that China has us dead bang.  They are not only a creditor but our industrial base.  They have their own problems but from my perspective they can quell some dissent with a minor conflict or skirmish particular if it at least looks like they defeated the great America.  The jingoistic moral boost would in my estimation let the CCP keep control of the situation.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:11 | 614251 geopol
geopol's picture

 The jingoistic moral boost would in my estimation let the CCP keep control of the situation..

Shameful,

They are not succumbed by the over zealot sense of patriotism  as it would manifest in America... And as that would prevail no CCP expanded control.

They are not going to overreach they will be very careful..   Their mantra..

I find you a fun antagonist,,, and someone that will provide a clue as to what is going on....We are not as diverse as you think on the economy...I will explain later...

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:22 | 614281 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Are you sure?  Now it's only personal experience but talking to people from China, and having friends who have spent time there, the are very proud of China.  They are porud of their achievement and the eventuality of having the same things as America.  The pride they have is similar to the pride I read about in America past.  They are watching modern infrastructure come out of no where and experiencing a rapid industrialization.  I can only imagine the setup would come presented as the USA trying to cheat them or harm them in some way.  I'm not saying they would take on the US lightly, but my guess is the Angle-American faction would fire the first shot forcing their hand.  And it need not even be a real war, simply forcing the US to back down in the current Vietnam row or a reunification with Taiwan would do the job.

As to economics I'm vehemently pro private holdings, and from the Austrian school.  However I hate the corporate structure.  On it's face it exists to remove liability, which is crazy if one expects responsibility.  I'm all for private business and enterprise but I'm not for these corporations having more rights then people.  So in that we most likely agree, my concern is when the state takes hold, it wastes resources and destroys the little guy.  Almost universally the state is the enemy of small business and the common man. So I'm loathe to support state action even in infrastructure, though I would find it more palpable if it was done on the state or local level.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:26 | 614032 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Wow, geopol became a contributor.  Congratulations.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:33 | 614050 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Upgrade bitches!!!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:36 | 614176 geopol
geopol's picture

CD, Do I owe you a PM of sorts,,,Maybe as a result of my misguided attempt at skate boarding in Europe...Did you see the VID??

http://vimeo.com/10555652

 

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 02:29 | 614775 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

Either cyborgs or aliens will thank you for this link someday.

Just as I.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 05:14 | 614944 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

CD, Do I owe you a PM of sorts,,,

Nope, you were drunk at the time you made the bet.

Did you see the VID??

Yes I did, three times. All I can say is Very Thin Guardrails, Very Long Drops!

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 09:28 | 615248 geopol
geopol's picture

Nope, you were drunk at the time you made the bet.

Work is the curse of the drinking class. 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:22 | 614161 geopol
geopol's picture

Hey,,tmosley,,,

Thankx

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:01 | 614109 Bob
Bob's picture

Thanks for illuminating one of the implications in the international arena, Geo. 

People seem to still think that we're the center of the universe.  We could only reasonably expect this trade war mongering to accelerate existing trends in common-sense fashion.  If the Chinese are smart, they'll help those EM countries develop more equitably than we have, capitalizing on the worldwide ill will we have cultivated so tirelessly over such a long time (though the past ten years have truly been our crowning glory) while replacing lost US consumers with new ones (in addition to their own citizens.)  This would also accelerate the abandonment of the dollar as reserve currency.  Etc, etc, etc. 

It's a slow motion train wreck of hubris. 

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:06 | 614116 geopol
geopol's picture

It's a slow motion train wreck of hubris. 

Perfect!!!

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 04:21 | 614918 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

Pretty sure Rome and the Romans were none too pleased when the Goths and Visigoths rode over them!

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 22:56 | 614443 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

geo-Thomas P.M. Barnett has been on this thesis for years, projecting that China-U.S. partnering with occasional squabbles, is a natural course of events.  He might be right.

http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/

He's pretty good, not too partisan, and Art C. ('bout the sharpest blade in the drawer) leaned on him before he (Art) died.

Worth a look.

- Ned

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 18:58 | 613967 gdogus erectus
gdogus erectus's picture

What part of "pegged" do people not understand?

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:00 | 613968 DoctoRx
DoctoRx's picture

Recently read a book about China from about 4 years ago by a Brit business journalist based there for years.  He described what must have been the world's biggest ongoing site bringing buyers and sellers together.  His point was the Chinese mfg costs were so low that the surprise was how high Wal-Mart's U. S. selling prices were.  So even if the yuan went up a bit more, WMT/TGT don't need to raise their prices at all.

Just as Tokyo can have had years of real estate deflation and still be the most expensive developed city for rents, we could in theory see price deflation here even if input prices rise.

Not made in China (I hope!) and thus slightly OT, but just consider how much mouthwash or toothpaste, which are almost all water, really cost to produce and get to a store shelf.  The margins are gigantic.

Who knows, but just sayin' . . .

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:00 | 614241 Bartanist
Bartanist's picture

The growth paradigm dictated by Wall Street, that actually caused the move of all manufacturing to China and the monumental acceleration of CEO salaries will not allow lower margins.

The US would need an entirely different paradigm ...

Decrease margin? Decrease CEO salaries? They'd rather sell the company ... which is what is happening now.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:24 | 614283 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

>The growth paradigm dictated by Wall Street, that actually caused the move of all manufacturing to China

And how does the Wall Street growth paradigm differ from other kinds of peaceful, human striving for greater prosperity?

>The US would need an entirely different paradigm ...

>Decrease CEO salaries?

You sound like a pay czar.

The problem is that USA is too socialist - by some measures, it is more socialist than China. Basic freedoms are lacking. For example, the freedom for two adults to exchange a certain amount of money for a certain amount of labor. Or, the freedom to keep more than half the money you've earned. No wonder business is fleeing.

Confucious say, "wise man not try to trap jobs in country by taking freedoms away".

 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:03 | 613971 Anarchist
Anarchist's picture

<sarcasm on>

Wow it is amazing how once Germany and Japan were forced by the US to devalue their currencies in the 80's, US exports took off. Yep the US started exporting up a storm once commodity prices spiked for US manufacturers and dropped for Germany and Japan.

<sarcasm off>

The Yen was 240/$ in 1985. It is now 90 yet their exports are still strong especially since they use China..etc. to hold down labor costs.

The Chinese will suffer pain if their currency rises too fast but they will also be able to buy commodities, foreign real estate and companies for less.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:05 | 613986 The Credible Hulk
The Credible Hulk's picture

Perhaps the motivation is to build up the scapegoat for after the catastrophe; it was all China's fault, lending us money with impudence and all that.

"We're going to need a bigger Ahmadinejad."

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 20:06 | 614117 Bob
Bob's picture

That looks like the larger political picture. 

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 21:21 | 614277 thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

I often fear that those fucking apocalyptic doomsday cultists (Christians) are right.

The Jews believe that the world has ended many times before, and will end again.

Jews control a large percentage of American power. A scapegoat may be unnecessary.

Thu, 09/30/2010 - 02:05 | 614755 SoCalBusted
SoCalBusted's picture

Exactly.  We suckered China, just like the folks that lent money to people that would never pay it back to buy their McMansions.

It's called Managing Up.

Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:06 | 613989 pauldia
Wed, 09/29/2010 - 19:27 | 614031 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Thanks.... shoe shine boy', can you say *Top*

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!