This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

HR 1207 Now Has The Support Of 290 Voters: Guarantees Passage

Tyler Durden's picture




 

In a critical development for the future of the Federal Reserve, Ron Paul has confirmed that today HR 1207 has garnered the elusive one vote to bring it to a total of 290, or a two-thirds congressional majority. At this point passage of the bill is guaranteed, and hopefully some long, long overdue transparency into the Wall Street-pandering machinations that occur every day within the Fed's four walls at the expense of the American middle class and unmitigated destruction of the US Dollar will finally become a fact.

 

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:17 | 71437 andy55
andy55's picture

I hate to be a downer, but there's that pesky bank-owned senate still to get through.  Sigh.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:23 | 71455 Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

Good point. Only 25 co-sponsors over there.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-604

 

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:04 | 71508 TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

time to start blazing those telephone wires.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:16 | 71524 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

We need a "Go Ahead, Make my Day" petition; If you Mr. Senator screw this up I will finance your opponent. NO ifs, NO ands, and NO buts about it, you will be displaced, this will be your last term.

So go ahead Mr. Senator, MAKE MY DAY.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:25 | 71531 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Do you have more money than Goldman and JPM? Are you ready and willing to spend it on political campaigns? If not, how scary do you think such a threat really would be?

The US has come to resemble a banana republic.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:24 | 71621 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

It takes a few million to win a Senate race. We the people can get that done.

Rand Paul is getting there:

837,000 dollars raised to date, No special interests

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:28 | 71816 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I hate to rain on the parade, but that you finance an
opponent is no concern to any of them in Congress. They
have the big bank funding. Really, it is time to do what the Colonist did at Concord Bridge.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 00:11 | 72032 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

What did he do?

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 02:27 | 72065 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

yar, i thought it was the brits that famously fired the 'shot heard round the world'.? admittedly, it's been a while since i read up on the history.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 19:02 | 71751 optionswriter
optionswriter's picture

Is Madame Speaker on board?  W/O her ok, it's doubtful the bill will go anywhere.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:17 | 71444 mule65
mule65's picture

Yay!  Another overpriced Govt program that won't work.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:18 | 71445 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

How far is the Senate willing to go to thwart the overtly-expressed will of the people?  Let's find out.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:37 | 71473 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

To the ends of the earth, or to quote Buzz Lightyear, "To Infinity - and BEYOND!" We may well be the first nation whose government accounting standards require the use of imaginary numbers. Hopefully we won't have greenbacks with denominations of "5x10~-10" too soon.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:07 | 71597 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Good point!

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:18 | 71446 john_connor
john_connor's picture

white house will veto unfortunately

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:30 | 71465 Mr. Anonymous
Mr. Anonymous's picture

How'd you solve the Captcha?  435/290=66.6%

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:43 | 71483 john_connor
john_connor's picture

my understanding is that white house can veto unless senate also has 2/3 majority, which I find very unlikely.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 19:05 | 71754 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

and the day when that bill lands on his desk will be the day when our fair leader will have to finally make the fateful decision of whether to side with the bankers or side with the people once and for all.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 22:07 | 71904 Andrei Vyshinsky
Andrei Vyshinsky's picture

Huh? When our fair leader will have to finally make the fateful decision of whether to side with the bankers or side with the people? Son, that decision was made long ago. You haven't been following things?

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 08:28 | 72153 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

correction: when our fair leader will finally make the decision to fully REVEAL whose side he's really on.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:23 | 71447 Crab Cake
Crab Cake's picture

If you guys think this is going to pass the completely corrupted Senate, after clearing the mostly corrupted House; you're crazy.

However, the rejection in the Senate should be an open invitation to the citizens of this country to raise holy hell. 

When this doesn't pass the Senate, and it won't, we as a people (at least several million) need to shut down DC.  Not a march, a week long camp out, and feel free to openly bear arms when you show up if you want.  Shut down DC.

There is no way the powers that be will allow this bill passage, they will fight, and we must too.  Bring grandma, bring the kids and the dog and the barbecue, and let's go show these aholes in Washington who is running the show here.  They can gan get with the program or they can resign. 

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:05 | 71510 VegasBD
VegasBD's picture

Id come to the east coast for that. As long as its during summer. F the snow

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:17 | 71526 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

That is the exact sentiment I have been expressing online, in both liberal, libertarian, conservative blogs. Most of them on all sides simply don't 'get' it, but those that do are growing in number - with each layoff is a new pissed-off recruit.

The time is now to shut that place down. Block all entry points, I don't care - just bring it down to its knees and make them do the people's bidding.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:05 | 71799 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

when you're down there, we thought it might be a neat creative act of civil disobedience for everyone to collect their trash neatly and bring it down to the federal reserve building and dump it at their gate.

why? well, since the FED is a public/private 'partnership' and the private end of the rope has seen it proper to use FED's balance sheet as a toxic waste dump, one could make a logical argument in court that the public has the right to use it a trash dump as well, yes?

even if not, the worst one could get is a ticket for littering.

we'll bring the compost bins.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:20 | 71449 alien-IQ
alien-IQ's picture

This is congress you're talking about. There are NO guarantees.

The only guarantee from them you can bank on is that whatever they do..."We the People" will get fucked and have to pick up the tab for "They the Banksters".

And so it goes....

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:25 | 71458 Yossarian
Yossarian's picture

Tyler, can you start and "Abolish The Fed" or "Sound Money" PAC? 

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:25 | 71459 Brian Griffin
Brian Griffin's picture

the senate will piss all over this parade

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:30 | 71463 Crook County
Crook County's picture

Thank you Zero Hedge for your continued support of the Bill.  Yesterday was Audit the Fed Mass Action day and thousands of petition signatures were delivered to Senate offices across the country and in Washington.  We should see more senate co-sponsors in the coming weeks. 

 

Dr. Paul's new book "End the Fed" comes out this week:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amUtCmpwf6A

 

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:31 | 71466 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

This criminal institution we call the Federal Reserve should have the most ignominious end. I am hoping HR1207 will speed things up to that end. I wish Ron Paul the very best. Good luck and Godspeed gentlemen!

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:36 | 71470 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

The dollar should not be the personal plaything of wall street.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:50 | 71472 waterdog
waterdog's picture

It will make it. Many Senators lost big time as did House members. Also, most of the really big losers blame it all on Bernanke. This is not about the Fed, it is about Bernanke.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:40 | 71477 Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

A delivery of boxes full of markers is on its way to the Senate.  If it makes it out of committee, the final version will look nothing like HR 1207 and won't be reconcilable (virtually no one will want to go on record with a No vote).

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:56 | 71498 maff
maff's picture

I think you just got it in a nutshell. An outright veto might be useful in a slap-in-the-face kind of way, but a quiet neutering...

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:01 | 71505 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Everyone read the above if you really want to understand what will happen.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:46 | 71486 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The message should be clear. Vote for HR 1207 in its original form or you can forget about getting re-elected.
Vote for anybody but an incumbent whether it be Republican or Democrat.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:47 | 71487 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The message should be clear. Vote for HR 1207 in its original form or you can forget about getting re-elected.
Vote for anybody but an incumbent whether it be Republican or Democrat.

Sorry if this is a double post.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:48 | 71489 mbielik24
mbielik24's picture

Little BBerg article that popped up. 

Goldman Lobbyist Barred From Financial Services Panel Democrats
2009-09-16 18:19:07.959 GMT

By Robert Schmidt
     Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) -- The head of Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s Washington lobbying office has been barred from communicating with the Democratic majority on the House Financial Services Committee as the panel seeks to overhaul financial regulations.
     Representative Barney Frank, chairman of the committee, issued the edict in a memo yesterday. Michael Paese, the Goldman lobbyist, was a top staffer on the committee until last September; he was hired by the New York-based bank in April.
     “As we move through the regulatory reform process, making sure that former members of our staff here don’t have undue influence is very important to us,” said Frank’s spokesman, Steve Adamske. “He wanted to make things as clear as possible.”
     The ban comes as the Financial Services Committee begins next month to put together legislation that would set out the most sweeping changes of Wall Street oversight in 75 years.
Banks, including Goldman, have become a target for lawmakers critical of the excessive risk taking that helped lead to the financial crisis.
     In his memo, Frank said that under House rules, Paese had been prohibited from lobbying the panel for one year after his employment there -- a period that expired on Sept. 11. To avoid the appearance of any conflict of interest, Frank said he would extend Paese’s recusal time until the end of the congressional term next year.
     “Neither I, nor full committee nor subcommittee staff, will meet, or otherwise communicate with, Michael on any issues related to committee business or jurisdiction,” wrote Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. “I ask that subcommittee chairs abide by this same rule.”
     Frank said he was notifying the Republicans on the committee about the decision.
     Goldman spokesman Lucas van Praag and Paese didn’t immediately return calls seeking comment.
     After leaving the Financial Services panel as deputy staff director, and before joining Goldman, Paese worked at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association as a lobbyist.

For Related News and Information:
On finance: NI FIN <GO>
On the credit crisis: NI CRUNCH BN <GO>
Most-read stories on the U.S. Treasury: TNI MOSTREAD TRE <GO> Credit crunch page: WWCC <GO> Government relief programs: GGRP <GO> Mortgage payment calculator: MP <GO> Winners, Losers in TARP: BTCPP <Index> MRR4 <GO>

--Editors: Brendan Murray, Jeremy Torobin

To contact the reporter on this story:
Robert Schmidt in Washington at +1-202-624-1853 or rschmidt5@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Chris Anstey at +1-202-624-1972 or
canstey@bloomberg.net
 

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 22:30 | 71930 Andrei Vyshinsky
Andrei Vyshinsky's picture

Oh, I wouldn't get lathered up over a little populist showboating by the poseur, Frank, young man. I mean this is "if-we-don't-bail-them-out-the-whole-economy-will-go-to-hell", Barney Frank, right? His deal was cut years ago. Why he probably called the man privately to explain what he was going to do in advance. If Frank were worth two dead flies, his taking this step never would have been necessary, capisce?

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:51 | 71494 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

What are the chances of the Audit being a watered down white-wash like the bank stress tests? I mean like when Peter Schiff commented the bank stress tests were like running a few gerbals across a bridge and calling the bridge safe.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 22:43 | 71939 agrotera
agrotera's picture

if Barney Frank has his way, this is exactly what would happen---GOD FORBID!

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 15:59 | 71502 taraxias
taraxias's picture

An audit of the FED will NEVER happen. 

After all, what are we trying to prove that the FED is insolvent?

If the Chinese don't know that by now, then they're not as smart as we give them credit for.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:48 | 71556 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

The American people have a right to know where their money is going, and for what purpose it is going there.  The American people may need to go to some extra measure to ensure that this information is forthcoming.  There is a blooming willingness to do so.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:22 | 71529 economicmorphine
economicmorphine's picture

I have spoken with staff in both Texas senators' offices and both support the Senate bill.  Of course, Texas is like a whole 'nuther country.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:35 | 71541 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

It used to be but what has happened to it? It looks like Perry is more fascist than the Feds.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:32 | 71539 E Thomas St.
E Thomas St.'s picture

What a bunch of defeatists.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:49 | 71561 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

It has to get out of committee to even come up for a vote. Does Barney Frank gay it up first?

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:50 | 71564 straightershooter
straightershooter's picture

Unless the senate got the dreadful "Pitchfork" warnings from every direction, there will be no transparency anywhere near Federal Reserve.

It is high time to let the Senate decide: Pitchfork or audit.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:19 | 71612 Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

Will the puppets find a way to turn control on their masters?  Boy, that has to be awfully tempting to some of these career pols.  Probably time to proactively bring out an example of what happens if you try; let's say, Spitzer?

 

Curious to see about tracking some incoming illegal contributions for life.  The Senators have to feel like 5 year-old kids thinking about what they want for Christmas from their step-father who was just accused of abuse.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:52 | 71577 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Gentlepersons:

SPX was ~ 1.3 points higher at the close than at ~ 2 PM and only ~ 4.3 points higher than the afternoon low. Not the usual ramp.

Could it be that someone is beginning to become concerned with all the recent attention?

Keep it coming ZH team!

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:57 | 71587 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The FED is sitting on the largest collection of worthless junk in the world - (I've just done the audit for you). The real numbers will never see sunshine - that's way too cleansing. Most people think the FED is the government anyway and working in the best interest of the common man. The BILL may pass but will be missing any authority to audit.

I've read much about "The Black Swan" and have come to think of it more as "Murphy's Law" - the market casino is crazy but I see so much gold advertising that it's in bubble mode as well. Nothing will be fixed because the next election cycle is coming followed quickly by the next election cycle.
That's the real issue.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 19:24 | 71772 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

wise anon,

your audit is full of juicy metaphors we find tasty.

if you could, please answer us this:

of this worthless junk, how much you think is backed by at least partial ownership of land (give or take say 10%)?

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:32 | 71823 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

agreed, nothing will be fixed because americans will be electing the next batch of politicians, equally tainted, into congress; there's just no way out guys, except kill the system or ship out. probably easier to do like jim rogers, have your children learn mandarin and hindi

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:00 | 71589 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Ron Paul may die before the bank owned Senate passes a real audit of the Fed, Mint or Treasury...

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:07 | 71595 Charley
Charley's picture

Hopefully they installed fire sprinklers in the Reichstag...

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:11 | 71602 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

People don't care, all the new primetime shows are back on.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:58 | 71662 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

What is the status of the Bloomberg FOIA request? Has the Fed filed an appeal yet?

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 19:13 | 71760 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

goddess bless crinkly cagey doc paul for continuing to stick the needle in.

darn good soap there doc

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:09 | 71803 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Want to know about the FED? Find info on this book!!!

VERY IMPORTANT READ THIS BOOK!!!

The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:32 | 71824 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I believe the bill will be watered down enough to the point where no real auditing of the Fed will occur. Maybe some vague and broad data but nothing specific. For example, Fred's nonperforming home loan is sitting there in the electronic vault of the Feds asset side and will remain there for perpetuity.

Regarding the Senate, i have always been curious as to how the big players control it. I know there is implied control by threatening to withdraw campaign funds if the senator doesnt do as the player wants him to. However, my guess is that there is a group of 10 to 15 senators that are "in" with the elites. These 10 to 15 senators exert a certain amount of control over other senators and keep the senate in line with regards to the elites wishes.

Not to sound too conspiratorial but there is obviously some element of control of the senate by behind the scenes persons and industries. How centralized and systematic it is i dont know. I would say that the Fed is largely controlled by the wall street kings. I think the senate in general is too stupid to have much knowledge about the inner workings of complex and highly illegal finance. Most of these congressmen are self centered fools that are happy to be part of the popular Washington club.

They get to attend meetings with high level people, eat at the best hotels, get to fly around in jets, and will live rather wealthy lives. Some of them are ideologically motivated while others just like being in the club. Others believe they have a duty to america. Very few of them really know what is going on with the economy and wall street in particular. So the elities basically tell them to do (enact) or not to do certain things and this is basically how they control the senate.

In the end, the people can still win over the banking elite and the main reason is because the bankers dont have control over the military, believe it or not, the president does. Were the president to ever break out of his bankster induced spell, he could turn on the Fed and have the marines confiscate all papers and documents and there is nothing any lawyer could do about it. The odds of this happening are 1/100000000

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 22:07 | 71905 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Civil Disobedience 2009-style: Publish a list of names and home addresses of all WS lobbyists in Washington. Add to it home addresses of all Congresspeople and their staff.

Let the People know where they can go to 'discuss' their differences.

America isn't just for lobbyists anymore.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 23:02 | 71959 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Congress will pass it. FED will engineer market crash . Senate would use that excuse for not passing

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!