You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Hundreds of GM Franchises May Get a Second Chance. Saab? Probably Not.

Travis's picture




The 1,350 GM dealerships, which were allowed to stay open until October of this year, were targeted as part of an effort to dump poor performers and to better align the General's dealership base with a much lower consumer demand for autos, especially domestics like Chevy, Buick, GMC and Cadillac.

Many of the dealerships in question were often too close to each other, competing on price, on a product with such a thin profit margin these days anyway, to sell a domestic car, you're surviving on dealership "minis" or "flats" (small commissions of under $100, in some cases) or factory "spins" (small amounts of money offered to the salesforce as an incentive based on volume).  It sucks to sell these things, if you call it selling anyway.

Congress passed legislation late in '09 that forces GM and Chrysler Group LLC, which shed almost 800 dealers last year, to give franchises a chance to appeal closure decisions. 

CEO Ed Whitacre said GM had a "pretty arbitrary cutoff point" for shedding dealers, and that it probably made mistakes in getting rid of some of them according to an article written by the Associated Press.

According to Whitacre- "Hundreds of dealers..." (pretty assuring, no?); but it's a "substantial number."  Again, assuring?

When the franchises were revoked early last summer, GM officials said dealers were judged on the metrics of meeting sales goals, customer service scores, the condition of their buildings, etc, etc.  They are allowed to stay open through October of this year to sell their remaining inventories.

Pressure from dealership groups and lawmakers have led GM and Chrysler to put out proposals that have allowed dealers to challenge closures in arbitration.  But a bill passed by Congress allows dealers to bring a much wider range of proof that they are "profitable," whatever angle the dealer of the government will want to call "profitable" these days.

Dealers have until the 25th of this month to notify the automakers if they will appeal.

As for Saab, will it get an appeal and another lease on life, saved by a potential suitor? 

Probably not.  CEO Whitacre put it like a real, down-home car salesmen to the Associated Press- "It's real easy. Just show up with the money and you can have it..." 

I wonder if, like the deal of a few months back, that if you bought a GM car and didn't like it, you could get your money back applies to the entire brand and manufacturer itself?

It could work... 

 




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 01/06/2010 - 20:13 | Link to Comment ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

Whitacre's Maverick reputation proceeds him. Give him a go based on past experience. 

Wed, 01/06/2010 - 20:17 | Link to Comment God
God's picture

Vanity is a sin Travis.

Wed, 01/06/2010 - 21:38 | Link to Comment Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

God damn it!  ...Oh, sorry.

Wed, 01/06/2010 - 20:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/06/2010 - 23:39 | Link to Comment ZerOhead
ZerOhead's picture

In store for Hummer you ask?

Apparently a 2010 order from the... wait for it... U.S. military for 10,000+ units for a grand total of $1.7 billion.

The Chinese are initiating a 2010 cost cutting model change which removes most of the armor and offensive capabilities in addition to renaming the brand "CHummer".

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/The-USAs-2009-Hummer-Orders-05278/

Wed, 01/06/2010 - 22:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/06/2010 - 23:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 11:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/06/2010 - 23:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/06/2010 - 23:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/06/2010 - 23:23 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

Whitacre is the consummate backroom guy - his SBC/Cingular maneuvers are textbook deal making - His appointment of William Daley (brother of Mayor Daley, Clinton Commerce Sec., Gore campaign mgr etc.) back in the day  speaks to his political savvy - as for this move with the dealerships - I think of Saab and the killing of the Magna/Opel deal along with the canning of Fritz, which all have Eddy's stamp on them - as do the TV commercials.  His job is to make this a win for the administration, which will be a successful public offering and he will likely pull it off.  Fritz was/is a car guy who  knew what needed to be done to give GM a fighting chance at survival and was offed for that reason. Ed needs to make two or three  quarters and create a story that Leo's pension pals will buy into.

Wed, 01/06/2010 - 23:29 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

This is so ridiculous.  It looks very unlikely that GM will ever again be a for-profit corporation in the ordinary meaning of the term.  More like one endless welfare roll for a stream of special interests with lobbyists.

Wed, 01/06/2010 - 23:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 06:06 | Link to Comment Mongo
Mongo's picture

The different turns around Saab is a f-n joke. Come on! Koenigsegg? The plastic-padding-manufacturer. Was only in it for the publicity. Spyker?.. Haven't even heard about that company before a couple of weeks ago when negotiations with Koenigsegg failed. And then there is that group of investors claiming interest.

 

WTF, this is like the display of the elephant boy and anybody who is first in line gets to be photographed with it!

 

Ah well.. Good riddens when Saab is put down. Feel sorry for the workers but hey.. this wasn't a surprise!

 

Now the union is going out in media claiming that the words from the CEO and the dead-line is just a show and that GM is REALLY REALLY committed to saving Saab even after deadline. Good luck with that!

 

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 08:29 | Link to Comment koaj
koaj's picture

Jerry Seinfeld will be very disappointed

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 08:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 11:03 | Link to Comment trav7777
trav7777's picture

Dealers that don't sell cars made by a company that nobody wants to buy from but is owned by the government.

GM will incentivize every car at a taxpayer loss until the side-effect is that all competition is driven out of business.  And then they will proclaim success, look how many cars we're selling.

Politics has just taken over business...the gov controls the car market, financing market, housing market, mortgage market.  If you like Affirmative Action's decision tree as far as how "benefits" should be apportioned, you will really love this.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:01 | Link to Comment cmalbatros
cmalbatros's picture

Those at SAAB could go and make records, as at their height ABBA was making more money than SAAB & Volvo put together.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!