This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

I Thought Quantitative Easing Ended?

Phoenix Capital Research's picture




 

Well, it’s
options expiration week again and as usual Wall Street is gunning the market
for all it’s worth. The bulls are falling for this shenanigan yet again, just
as they did in June.

 

How’d that
work out?

 

 

Tracking
options week manipulations isn’t easy because there are no strict rules: the
action all depends on where the market is and the number of outstanding
contracts at given price points.

 

For
instance, back in April investor bullishness was at extremes. Consequently,
Wall Street ramped stocks first upwards (the usual predilection) to shank the
puts… only to swiftly reverse the action in the middle of the week to shake out
the calls.

 

 

This whole
system occurs courtesy of the Federal Reserve which openly and blatantly pumps
the market on options expiration week. I’ve shown the below chart before. It’s
staggering that no one in Congress or any of the regulators actually bother
following up on this. How much more obvious does Bernanke need to get?

 

Options expiration weeks in bold


Week

Fed Action

July 8
2010

+$1
billion

July 1
2010

-$13
billion

June 24
2010

+$175
million

June 17 2010

+$12 billion

June 10
2010

-$4
billion

June 3
2010

+$2
billion

May 27
2010

-$16
billion

May 20 2010

+$14 billion

May 13
2010

+$10
billion

May 6 2010

-$4
billion

April 29
2010

-$1
billion

April 15 2010

+$31 billion

April 8
2010

+$420
million

April 1
2010

-$6
billion

March 25
2010

+$5
billion

March 17 2010

+$25 billion

March 11
2010

+$2
billion

March 4
2010

-$5 billion

February
25 2010

+$8
billion

February 18 2010

+$21 billion

February
11 2010

+$7
billion

February 4
2010

+2 billion

January 28
2010

-$4
billion

January 21
2010

-$39
billion

January 14 2010

+$56 billion

January 7
2010

+$1
billion

December
31 2009

-$1
billion

December
28 2009

+$35
million

December 17 2009

+$49 billion

December
10 2009

-$17
billion

December 3
2009

-$2
billion

November
27 2009

-$2
billion

November 19 2009

+$73 billion

November
12 2009

-$30
billion

November 5
2009

+$3
billion

October 29
2009

-$39
billion

October 22
2009

+$8
billion

October 15 2009

+$54 billion

October 8
2009

-$3
billion

October 1
2009

-$17
billion

September
24 2009

+$18
billion

September 17 2009

+$51 billion

September
10 2009

+$4
billion

September
3 2009

+$8
billion

August 27
2009

+$14
billion

August 20 2009

+$46 billion

August 13
2009

+$25
billion

August 6
2009

-$11
billion

July 30
2009

-$38
billion

July 23
2009

-$33
billion

July 16 2009

+$80 billion

 

Notice that
on non-expiration weeks the Fed either pumps the system slightly or, more
commonly, removes money.

 

However,
once options expiration week hits, it’s PUMP time. To whit, the Fed has NOT had
a single options expiration week in which it HASN’T pumped the market in nearly
one year.

 

Moreover, note that despite the Fed’s
Quantitative Easing Program ending in March, the Fed continues to pump $10+
billion into the system EVERY month when options expiration week rolls around.

 

Didn’t
Bernanke say he wouldn’t continue buying assets from Wall Street after QE
ended? More importantly, didn’t QE end? Why is the Fed still pumping money into
this system?

 

And finally…
how many times does this have to happen before someone in power actually
notices it? Seriously, we’re talking about the Fed going 12 for 12 in the last
year. And it’s not like the pump jobs are even subtle: they’re DRAMATICALLY
larger that any other capital infusions the Fed makes during non-options
expiration weeks.

 

Good
Investing!

 

Graham
Summers

 

PS. For more hard-hitting investment insights revealing the real reasons the market moves as it does, join me at www.gainspainscapital.com

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 07/29/2010 - 23:44 | 495535 Bertie Wooster
Bertie Wooster's picture

#1  the two biggest increases on your list don't fall in the options expiration week.  These two increases are bigger than all the others combined.  Explain that.

#2  If you're going to make an accusation that the Fed'l Gov't is buying stocks, you'd better document just what data you're tracking.   An increase in the Fed Reserve's balance sheet doesn't mean that increase is spent on stock purchases which go against put options.  You've skipped steps.  I shouldn't have to read in the comments where your data came from, it should be supplied in the article.  Also, if you're trying to imply that increases in Fed balance sheet indirectly boosts stock buying in the week the balance sheet is expanded, please explain to all of us how that happens; you know, so a 4th grader could understand it.  Cuz I for one don't know how it happens.   In the Alan Grayson video cited in the comments, I appreciate him trying to nail down why the Fed'l Reserve is loaning money to foriegn govts like New Zealand, but swaps lending and stock buying are two different things.

#3  Options expiration was last week, not this week.   So you need to either properly date your article at the top (appropriate LAST week, not this week) so as not to confuse the reader, or determine why the author thinks options expiration is tomorrow instead of a week ago.

So overall, this is sloppy reporting typical of ZeroHedge.  Your blog would be much better off if you better specified which areas are cloudy, instead of overstating your case for the benefit of effect.  Maybe you're right, our gov't is buying stocks during options week to aide investment banks who sell the puts, but this article is just as much smoke and mirrors as the Fed'l Gov't.  So I hold both you and the Fed'l Gov't are in the same degree of skepticism-- and that's a shame bc ZH I'd like to believe.

Fri, 07/30/2010 - 08:13 | 495729 mephisto
mephisto's picture

1. The data is ok, I checked - dont confuse millions and billions

2. Agree.

3. This is an old post from the contributors blog 2 weeks ago.

Its a contribution not a ZH piece.

Thu, 07/29/2010 - 01:42 | 493606 gerryscat
gerryscat's picture

Someone in power? The Fed runs the government, not the other way around.

Thu, 07/29/2010 - 01:30 | 493595 tyler
tyler's picture

Ron Paul?

Thu, 07/29/2010 - 00:33 | 493558 DavidRicardo
DavidRicardo's picture

You thought, Graham, because you don't have the slightest idea what is going on.

 

Mellonesque liquidation is what is going on.  In case you hadn't heard, that's government removing itself from the society at the behest of the powerful.

 

It means looting.  It does NOT mean

 

1.  government spends less;

2.  government gets smaller;

3.  government gets less intrusive.

 

Mellonesque liquidation is a serious, complex discipline.

 

Too bad you don't have the same intellectual discipline.

 

You do a disservice to everyone who wants to understand, by your own willful failure to understand.

 

Shameful.

Thu, 07/29/2010 - 00:03 | 493545 tony bonn
tony bonn's picture

i have been reading graham summers for quite some time and am a huge fan....this article should be mass mailed to everyone in america....that would be an opportunity to expose the lying scumbag shitpiles who charade as banksters, politicians, and bildebergers and incite voters to burn these punks into oblivion....

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 23:19 | 493509 wgpitts
wgpitts's picture

We need to initiate a class action lawsuit

The Federal Reserve Bank on Thursday April 1, 2010 admits it secretly and illegally purchased tens of billions of dollars of equities in companies, from their co-conspirators/insider traders, and did not disclose this information to investors. This was material information that affected the financial stocks that was undisclosed. This is a felony offense for the following reasons.

1. They were not authorized by law to purchase these stocks or equities

2. These were material transactions that effected entire market segment and investors were not made aware of these material transactions.

3. Only insiders knew of these purchases and invested accordingly

Additionally, the owner’s of the Federal Reserve Bank are the same banks and institutions that received this illegal money. They obtained personal benefit from these illegal/insider transactions.

Investors who had short positions or purchased “put options” were defrauded of billions. I purchased short positions and was defrauded. I want to prosecute.

Those guilty by their own admission should be arrested. Those who lost because of this fraud should be compensated for their loss.

Below is my complaint.

Fed Releases Details on Bear Stearns, AIG Portfolios
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aymTlczlMmpA&pos=1

Fed in hot water over secret bailouts
http://www.csmonitor.com/Money/Robert-Reich-s-Blog/2010/0401/Fed-in-hot-water-over-secret-bailouts

The Fed Admits To Breaking The Law
http://networkedblogs.com/21Xqv

Geithner: Pickpocketing Trillions from the People to Give to the Oligarchy Was "Deeply Unfair", But We ... Um ... Had To
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/04/geithner-looting-country-for-trillions.html

Why Is The Fed Actively Managing A $25 Billion Maiden Lane MBS Portfolio When Its $2.4 Trillion SOMA Holdings Have A $1 Billion DV01? (And Are Unhedged)
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/why-fed-actively-managing-25-billion-maiden-lane-mbs-portfolio-when-its-24-trillion-soma-hol

Dylan Ratigan MSNBC exposes Federal Reserve Con
Part 1 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACm1ntw_4dM&feature=player_embedded
Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSpCSzgB4MA&feature=player_embedded

Dylan Ratigan states that US Attorney’s office in New York investigating. Re: Lehman Brothers
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/35841681#35841681

April 9 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. banks masked their true risk levels by temporarily lowering debt before reporting it, the Wall Street Journal said, citing data provided by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aXNVR4sYxMKU&pos=6

4/9/10 Major U.S. banks masked risk levels: report
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE63813R20100409

The SEC Complaint filed is below

My complaint below was filed in December.

Investors have lost billions of dollars taking short positions on financials while you allowed the private central banks to manipulate the banks financial positions without disclosing to investors. Only the bank insiders knew. They made a killing. This is fraud. What are you going to do about it? My complaint that I filed is below.

So how can the central banks secretly loaning banks hundreds of billions of dollars and not tell the public? How can one make market investment decisions when this info is not disclosed?

How can the central banks secretly provide hundreds of billions of dollars to banks and not disclose this information to investors? Isn’t this market manipulation? Where is the SEC? All those with put options or short sales were defrauded. I am one of those persons!

Barnanke admits they gave $1/2 Trillion dollars to foreign banks...then the foreign banks did this...the fed subornated fraud in the financial markets through the ECB and with direct undisclosed purchases...everyone who purchased put options or shorted the banks was defrauded

Alan Grayson: "Which Foreigners Got the Fed's $500,000,000,000?" Bernanke: "I Don't Know."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0NYBTkE1yQ&feature=player_embedded

BoE Secretly Loaned $102.9 Billion to RBS
http://www.cnbc.com/id/34126826

Bank of England tells of secret £62bn loan to save RBS and HBOS
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/6646923/Bank-of-England-tells-of-secret-62bn-loan-to-save-RBS-and-HBOS.html

Bank of England advisers not told about secret £62bn loan to HBOS
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/dec/03/bank-england-secret-loan-hbos

Bank gave RBS and HBOS 'secret' £62bn loan
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article6929451.ece
Fed Refuses to Disclose Recipients of $2 Trillion
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=apx7XNLnZZlc

Fed Fights Request To Disclose Who Got $2 Trillion In Bailouts
http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/3775032

Is Obama manipulating the stock market?
Economist claims president 'jawboning' economy to boost Dow
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=92100

VIDEO: Federal Reserve Manipulating Stock Prices?
http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/09/video-federal-reserve-manipulating-stock-prices/
Does The Government Actually Manipulate The Stock Market?
http://www.businessinsider.com/does-the-government-actually-manipulate-the-stock-market-2010-2

Thu, 07/29/2010 - 01:33 | 493538 DrLamer
DrLamer's picture

A class action lawsuit?

C'mon, dont You see this is not a court "US People vs. US .gov". This is a court "God vs. USA". Today the US Government is simply a punishment for stupido idolatro americano (no personal offense for honourable readers of ZH).

If You are going to win a court vs. USA .gov, first win the court vs. Creator.

Do you need a list of USA' sins ? (Again ?!)

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 21:22 | 493336 laosuwan
laosuwan's picture

the real issue here is not that the market is corrupt; we all know that. The issue is, when will the market collapse? The Fed has been keeping this game going for decades and during that time analysts have been warning of the end, advising to stock up on guns and butter, buy textured vegetable protein, move to Alaska, bury gold in the ground, etc. And yet the market and the west keeps going its merry old way. What will it take for the house of cards to collapse? I would guess it will take either (a) a military that can no longer be sustained due to its cost of corruption, (b) the dollar / euro collapses, or (c) social collapse in US, Canada and Europe due to taxation, muslim immigration and birth rates, and / or  crime. Experts have been predicting and warning about all of these for decades and still the machine keeps limping along. Personally, the only solution that seems to make sense to me is to move, and that's waht i did (not Alsaka, too many flies in the summer) but Asia, with a back up place in South America. As I have posted before, the only good investment at this time is to get out of the US or Europe while you still can. 

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 20:54 | 493305 daverinda
daverinda's picture

The derivatives market-making community, including the major Wall Street dealers, have an enormous need for capital to support expiration week trading demands, and the Fed activity reflects that.  The week following, the extra liquidity is removed.  It's really pretty benign.  The trend is down as Anonymouse has pointed out.  And, that fits with an overall downward trend in equity markets volume, including options, during the analysis period.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 20:45 | 493294 Trifecta Man
Trifecta Man's picture

Sure looks like the Fed is directly affecting the stock market during options expiration week, or they are buying (dubious?) assets from .... banks or trading firms .... who then affect the stock market.  Or could they be "LEASING" those assets to the Fed for some quick trading cash?

Holy smokes!  No wonder the Fed does not want to be audited.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 20:36 | 493282 Nikki
Nikki's picture

St. Louis Fed has all this data downloadable. A colleague at work downloads sp from yahoo all into excel and shows how fed monetray expansion and contraction leads the market for the last 30 years !!!!

Recently the action only takes days before you see the effect. How do you think Doug Kass called the bottom a few weeks ago ?. He got a tip the pump was back on and voilà 500 points just like that...

Don't believe ???, due your own research then. The data is available with two week time delay.... So you goyem don't get the signal in real time. That is reserved for the kosher nostra of course. Lol.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 20:14 | 493260 Hang The Fed
Hang The Fed's picture

Hahahaha!  Brilliant analysis...it only goes to show that there really is only a thin tissue of lies between what's reported by the moronic hacks at CNBC or (more deplorably) CNN Money, and what is actually occurring on the ground and behind the scenes.  As I said once before...the fact that a "shadow economy" exists is a bald-faced indication that we are being bought, sold, and swapped, so long as there's a sufficient number of good little sheep who will continue to buy the lie presented by continous buggering of the numbers...lies, damn lies, and statistics, in descending order of credibility, so long as they happen to be furnished almost entirely by a political-corporate aristocracy that only cares for themselves, and no one else.

"And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all."  In the present context, you could substitute "the Federal Reserve," or, "the IMF" for "the Red Death," and it would be contemporarily accurate.  What a sad bunch of fucking clowns.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 20:09 | 493255 freshman
freshman's picture

Where did you get the "Fed Action" Numbers? If you can verify this, the Fed really needs to be prosecuted for openly manipulating the equity market.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 19:23 | 493173 mephisto
mephisto's picture

Market makers hae been pumping options week since Black & Scholes were babies. No Fed intervention was ever necessary before, don't see why it would be now. 

Note the volume on op ex day is now multiples of the average daily volume, and it's concentrated in fewer hands - so options are now a more important feature of market dynamics. In this world simple hedging, with no manipulation, can get you some systematic moves. I don't know of any way they can offload the risk to the Fed. Even if the Fed was funding them, the banks wouldn't like the delta risk on the scale of the "Fed Action" here. It's bigger than Kerviel. Doesn't make sense to me.

However, the data pattern is odd. Like others here, am curious what the "Fed action" column is...

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 18:53 | 493108 egdeh orez
egdeh orez's picture

Thanks for the info Graham Summers!

Quick question: where do you get the stats for the "fed action" column?

Seems like they dumped a lot of money into the markets in the week of June 24!

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 20:52 | 493303 Trifecta Man
Trifecta Man's picture

See my note above.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 18:18 | 493048 Miss American
Miss American's picture

It's the same with the PM market.  What I can't figure out is what sucker, at this point, even buys PM call options.  

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 18:03 | 493006 intrinsic_value
intrinsic_value's picture

Hello, just a question to the author -- is the number called "Fed Action" repo transactions, securities purchases of some sort, or some other expansion of the Fed balance sheet?  Just trying to understand where the numbahs come from.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 20:50 | 493301 Trifecta Man
Trifecta Man's picture

In each week's link:

See table 10, row Total assets,  column Change Since Wednesday {prior week date}.

http://federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/

Yes, they added over $8 billion of assets during the week of July 15th.

Rich

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 17:47 | 492978 Goldenballs
Goldenballs's picture

Either the Feds out of control or there is a section of the Government out of control or probably both.This action seems to amount to institutional fraud,or is it that the finanancial system is so irretreivably broken that this is the only way it can be kept limping along.Smoke screens and funny money can,t last for ever,if you drop a stone in water you get ripples,what will the long term effects of all the ripples be,and who will ultimately pay the price,won,t be the people dropping the stones thats for sure ? I am pretty sure if we knew the whole truth there would be a run on the banks and people would be converting everything they could to Gold and Silver. Just check the ever growing list of insolvent US banks,growing day by day,imagine the outflow of funds from these institutions,where is this cash ending up,certainly not back in the banks with interest rates so low.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 18:49 | 493102 lumen ex lumine
lumen ex lumine's picture

the finanancial system is so irretreivably broken that this is the only way it can be kept limping along . ( "irretrievably" actually, but what difference does it make? )

 

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 19:17 | 493163 Goldenballs
Goldenballs's picture

Sorry about that,I think "knackered" just about sums it up....

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 17:46 | 492973 Shell Game
Shell Game's picture

Nice article, Graham, thanks.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 17:47 | 492979 Shell Game
Shell Game's picture

It's a matter of national security now, the proxy is all they've got..

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 17:42 | 492964 Leo Kolivakis
Leo Kolivakis's picture

Very interesting article, thank you for posting your thoughts. Always wondered about this.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 17:30 | 492937 johngaltfla
johngaltfla's picture

That's one hell of an article. And what is sad is we can never analyze the overnight balance sheet of the Fed. I'll bet it is quite interesting if not disturbing.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 17:29 | 492933 Quinvarius
Quinvarius's picture

Numbers are getting bigger too.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 18:19 | 493052 Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

I think you are reading the data backwards.  The numbers are getting smaller, not larger.  While there has been activity since April, the overall position has not really changed since then.

Even so, plotting it out shows it even better than a data table.  The trend is quite blatant.  It would be intereting to see this against SP500 performance

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 17:10 | 492893 bxmckenna
bxmckenna's picture

Outstanding analysis and reporting.  I would love to see the actual assets on the Fed's balance sheet if we were ever allowed.  Then again, they're probably not much more than IOUs written on some Post It notes anyway. 

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 16:59 | 492866 metastar
metastar's picture

Excellent Article!

Thanks.

Wed, 07/28/2010 - 22:25 | 493429 tictawk
tictawk's picture

This has been going on for 20 years.  What you need to watch is the P/C Open Interest totals for the front month on the options on futures contracts.  The P/C ratio is 2:1 average.  It has been a little lower in the recent months but usually 2 or 3:1.  The put sellers are the primary dealers and I am sure that their interests are well looked after.  The Fed covers them in every way.  I still remember the time the market tanked big time on the day before option expiry and the Fed lowered interest rates one hour before settlement the next morning and the SnP ran up 80pts.  Greenspan was the crook in charge. So yes, it is a stacked deck.  Know your enemy if you are buying puts because they are out to screw you. I have been trading and watching this market for 25 years.  

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!