You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.
Insider Selling Only 28 Times More Than Buying In Prior Week
The prior week's insider transaction indicated a significant moderation in insider selling, with insiders selling only 27.7x more than they bought, at $106.1 million vs $3.8 in buys versus sells, respectively. Obviosuly insiders are catching wind that things are now truly back to normal.Source: finviz.
»
- 4820 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:
- Insider Selling To Buying Surpasses 1,400-1
- Insider Selling To Buying Update: 2,019 To 1
- Insider Selling Hits All Time Record Of $4.5 Billion In Prior Week As Everyone Is Getting Out Of Market
- Insider Selling To Buying Ratio Doubles To 147x; Big Selling In Autozone, A&F, Chipotle
- Insider Selling To Buying: 2,341 To 1
as i said before...just wait till all those sellers become buyers again. if after all that selling, the market has only retreated a few percent, there could be a meltup coming before the next truly big meltdown comes.
The maggots cashing out stock options in droves is hardly cause for optimism.
You have no call tearing down maggots by comparing them to corporate execs. Please apologize to our little friends.
Agreed. Maggots make a contribution to society.
Exactly, maggots do everyone a service by eating up filth, while corporate execs do the opposite by creating and peddling filth.
Oh, it's even worse than that, buzzsaw.
The level of stock option issuance and acquisition is as low as its been in years. The maggots that are acquiring these options really don't "lose money" on them, but can "make money" if they sell options higher that the price of acquisition.
What it implies is that the maggots that purchase these things are holding back. And why would they holding back for?
Lower prices. Much lower prices.
Is everybody aware of all the nuances of the macro-economic implications for the entire planet based on this news?
Climate fears based on lies, Calgary told Think-tank adviser says CO2 not a threat; Warming science called flawedhttp://www.calgaryherald.com/health/Climate+fears+based+lies+Calgary+told/2058176/story.html
If anyone has read State of Fear by Crichton, they will know that global warming is just fear mongering. NASA had some news out last year about the polar caps on Mars melting more than expected, not due to man made pollution, but due to variences in the sun's temperature.
Cap and Trade is just another way for someone to make money at the expense of others.
The world does not need saving. It will be here a long time after we are all dead.
"polar caps on Mars melting more than expected"
que?
There is evidence that temp/Co2 here follow sun spot activity. If true, studying ice on other planets provides some insight into +temps not being an earth-only phenom, thus not necessarily man-made
Sorry for not having links...google knows them though.
I had to acknowledge this post since it irritates me that zerohedge has obviously become significant enough to appear on the radar of interests that would like to spread misinformation and bolster their causes. What you are doing seems to be antithetical to the raison d'être of this website. Your comment had nothing to do with the original post, it was a negative contribution.
Your article had nothing scientific to refute so I will stick primarily to the messenger. An issue as complex as anthropogenic climate change requires you to be very particular about where you get your information. It being complex makes it ripe for manipulation by nefarious actors or groups. Rather than giving a course on the subject I will take the low route and suggest that you and everyone look at the apparent consensus amongst scientific bodies around the globe and read the summary or the entire report published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change www.ipcc.ch
Contrasted with the source that you cited, Christopher Monckton who has only a "degree in classics and a diploma in journalism and...no further qualifications." According to http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Christopher_Monckton
Whereas, the consensus on anthropogenic climate change is bolstered by the following reports:
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
U.S. Global Change Research Program
Arctic Climate Impact Assessment
The following scientific bodies recognize the conclusions of the IPCC report:
European Academy of Sciences and Arts
American Meteorological Society
National Research Council (US)
Geological Society of America
Royal Meteorological Society (UK)
American Medical Association
World Health Organization
International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences
Joint Science Academies: Since 2001, 32 national science academies have come together to issue joint declarations confirming anthropogenic global warming, and urging the nations of the world to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.
American Association for the Advancement of Science
European Science Foundation
American Geophysical Union
European Federation of Geologists
You can find more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
Scientific consensus and peer review is on the rocks and is discredited due to this news.
Please do a little more research, and anyone who relies on wikepedia is a dope.
Thy these sites;
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7168
http://www.climatedepot.com/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
It is amazing that thousands of PhD level scientists and the scientific bodies that they are members of have not jumped all over your 'news' that discredits their years of work. Anyone who could show that anthropogenic climate change was non-existent would win a Nobel Prize. Everyone, scientists included, wish this was the case. We would be permitted to continue recklessly consuming and producing with dirty forms of energy for centuries to come and hopefully develop solutions to our energy problems in the meantime. If you believe that these scientists are purposefully ignoring your claims, then you have no clue how the scientific process works or have no faith in it. Strange since it is likely the basis for the work done by your sources.
I relied on wikipedia for information regarding the opinions of scientific bodies. This information is indisputably correct and is cited in the article. I challenge you to dispute the citations if you really want to tackle the credibility of wikipedia.
Those sites are garbage. I read through them and one has a vampire doll with blood spraying out of its mouth and a stake through its heart as an icon for an article entitled 'Steve McIntyre is Driving a Stake Through Global Warming'
This is especially comical since there is ZERO debate regarding whether global warming is occurring. It is a fact that the earth is warming. Steve McIntyre is completely insane if he denies that the planet is warming. There is a debate over to what degree humans are influencing this warming.
Sorry dude. When you guys gave Al Gore a nobel prize for An Inconvenient truth. You completely lost my wilingness to listen to your crap.
I watched Al Gore grapple with basic math concepts while listening to someone try to explain bandwith diffferences between a T-1 and an OC-3. HIs mind has all the scientific capabilities of mold slime.
Fuck God. It's not just that the guy is an asshole. It's just that he's an asshole with a God complex.
Fuck Global Warming Scientists. It's not just that they are assholes. It's just that they are assholes intent on turning limitations into profits.
The earth's temperature fluctuates. All we are doing is converting more hydrocarbons and carbohydrates back into more hydrocarbons and carbohydrates. Plus a bit more limestone on the ocean floor.
http://khqqdw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1p5HO9wC6wY5kHiBbfb17Iu06alSN9Q8hJz...
I just had to add. I hope you hate limestone too. Cause that means you hate marble and if you ever break a hip and fall on a marble floor you set the bone yourself and then lick the floor to heal it. But since you hate throwing carbon out and letting it combine with stuff. You just lay there on the linoleum and DIE. LOL
I just had to respond to this.
You got to be kidding me. You said, "Anyone who could show that anthropogenic climate change was non-existent would win a Nobel Prize." And you are right and that person is mild mannered Stephen McIntyre.
And how many people on the entire planet do those scientists you speak of are enumerated at? Lets just agree that number would be .001% of the entire population. So you are telling me that .0001% of the population hold sway over my life without a debate?
Does this mean the earth is not flat? nefarious actors indeed
Anthropogenic? F*ck off.
ROFL @ the AMA having an opinion on climate change. They cannot even succeed at their chose profession, because they are a bunch of Drug Co lackeys treating symptoms.
Other official "science" gems from the past:
"The earth is flat"
"Sun revolves around the earth"
Temps now aren't even near the ultimate highs. Given the choice, you would rather be too hot, than too cold. Cold is far more deadly because sh!t doesn't grow when the ground is frozen, and when the ground is frozen, guess what all the white sh!t around you is made out of (HINT: something else that food requires to grow, and humans cannot survive without)
Then again, we are overdue for the next mass extinction.
As an environmentalist, I don't play the Global Warming card. I further don't agree on carbon cap and trade(another ponzi). Personally, I just want a cleaner, less polluted environment to live in and for others to live in. I don't despise coal use because of melting polar caps, but because of the effects of coal mining/burning on it's surrounding areas. If industry has to be held over the fire to get them to change (via pollution taxation of some sort) I'm fine with that.
Michael -
FYI, not that I am a global warming alarmist, but Monckton (the guy in the article) is a bit of a loon.
Don't shoot the messenger because the information is 100% accurate.
What if the messenger just needs shooting?
Edit: Michael, you post obsessively on this topic at Mish's and on this site. Occassionally you will say something relevant to the discussion. But it is mostly on how climate change is a hoax. I don't have an opinion to express here about it. But I do know you do this.
I will not shoot you but I will be direct. Are you paid to spread this info on these kinds of websites that might have sympathetic readers? Or are you enthralled to the topic?
I've been posting off topic on this subject for more than a year now because it has economic implications. I am not paid for this but I will pay if Cap-And-Trade passes. My main goal is to kill Cap-and-Trade with truthful scientific observations. Climate and weather are my hobby, just as economics and politics are my hobby. I am a machinist by trade.
I am flattered you recognize me. Can you ask Mish and CR to un-ban me when you post over there again? At least when I get banned I know I am doing my job.
P.S.
I've been banned at Huffington Post, Democratic Underground, Town Hall, and Red State as well.
I wonder why...
Assetman. He knows both correlation and causation. He can spot it like an owl.
Actually the whole article is just an opinion with the only factual information presented being the discussion of how the DDT ban increased the cases of malaria by 20 times, and even that misses a critical point that the ban itself had no direct impact on mosquito populations as DDT has always remained legal for waterways applications, but due to the lack of economies of scale for the manufacturers once it was banned from use on certain common crops, it became too expensive to use for killing off mosquitoes in the third world. So basically the only factual information he utilizes as a comparison to justify his opinion in an unrelated field that he has no prior experience in, still misrepresents the facts to fit his argument.
It's accurate because he says it is? Did he name any of these new studies? I actually would love to hear about them - I have my doubts about climate change and would love to read whatever he is referring to.
The article certainly doesn't say what they are. Hard to claim it's 100% accurate without knowing what information the messenger is providing.
Glad to oblige. All the information can be found here.
http://www.climatedepot.com/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
Makes sense.
Does NBC have the Olympics is 2016? Those fcukers are pimping again.
It could be that they've already sold most of what they could and are now just running on fumes, with the market having gone way higher than they expected. Their level of selling and buying is close to 10x smaller than the average week in August.
Exactly. They're all already in gold and silver.
I am Chumbawamba.
They sold early because they knew the shares were fundamentally over-valued, one penny is more than many are worth.
So, if you couple this info,with the ever increasing uneployment numbers, and Keals(whatever his name is)famous shouting "the recession is over"(which incidently came a couple of days before the last leg to the 1000 territory,so that might have been the buy signal for some gs companies),what can we deduce?That to MSM,it was recession only when the elites (all those insiders+some others)networth was down by 50%(due to stocks and not the declining dollar,lol). And since they mostly recovered their losses,or added some networth(if they managed to buy at the low,like the famous nyfed and gs board member),then the conclusion is that recession is over. Why do you,TD,keeps on bothering us about middle class,and other irrelevant subjects(as in subjects of a queen or king)?
Mr Spin Says:
This is so bullish. The pent up demand for equities must be coiling up like the world's tightest spring. When insiders start to buy, the purchases will mirror the sales and that quarter will make the past two look like a poverty level market. You have to get out ahead and Buy now and buy hard. Dow 15,000, we're back!
Is the plan to debase the dollar in jeopardy?For the longest time I suspected that the Euro zone is petrofied about a weak dollar and a strong Euro,despite the German fear of hyperinflation. I can't imagine Greece,Italy,Spain Portogal,who probably are living off of German exports,like a strong Euro. So here is a food for thought till tommorow http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=am.KozKbfbEI
If they are selling someone is buying...definitely a grass root, green shoot!
Banks in Spain are following the scrited book of tha banks in the U.S.Here is a link(of course banks here are not even foreclosing)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aXWVn3mlVH4c
Corps switched from option awards to share awards. So its free money no matter where the price has gone. Can even use the loss to offset other gains.
Share awards (restricted stock) have not been a total replacement for stock options. The former has become a greater % of total compensation, but option programs remain at most public companies. I know, because I vote on a boatload of proxies.
Beleive me, when the timing is "right" there will be a flood of option issuances. It's just a matter of time... and price.
Ban management options. Corporations must pay incentives in some form of restricted stock. What the hell is so hard about that?
Oh ya, corporatism rules, not common sense....silly me.