This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Internal BP Document Confirms Matt Simmons' Worst Case Prediction Of Spill Rate Of 100,000+ Barrels Per Day

Tyler Durden's picture




 

An internal BP document released by the chairman of the Energy and Environment Subcommittee in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Ed Markey, discloses what the vast majority already know - that a "worst case" gusher scenario could be as high as 100,000 barrels of oil per day. According to an exhibit discussing flow rate probabilities, BP says that "If BOP and wellhead are removed and if we have incorrectly modeled the
restrictions – the rate could be as high as ~ 100,000 barrels per day
up the casing or 55,000 barrels per day up the annulus (low probability
worst cases)
." This is getting very close to the estimate presented previously by Matt Simmons that the flow rate could be as high as 120,000 bpd. As Markey notes, "This number is in sharp contrast to BP’s initial claim that the leak
was just 1,000 barrels a day. At the time this document was made
available to Congress, BP claimed the leak was 5,000 barrels a day, and
told Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee that the worst
case scenario was be 60,000 barrels a day.
This document tells a
different story." It is stunning to discover that a major multi-national corporation could be so daring as to lie to shareholders, Congress and taxpayers. The next question that Congress may want to look into is why the Obama administration swallowed BP's lies hook line and collapsing GoM floor bed, without using an independent 3rd party verification, and what the liability to the firm would be if the official flow rate is revised to be twice higher than the current worse case scenario. We are confident that as more of the structural integrity of the seabed collapses, that even Simmons' estimate will prove to be conservative.

More from Ed Markey:

“Considering what is now known about BP’s problems with this well prior to the Deepwater Horizon explosion, including cementing issues, leaks in the blowout preventer and gas kicks, BP should have been more honest about the dangerous condition of the well bore,” said Markey, the chairman of the Energy and Environment Subcommittee in the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

On Thursday, Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen was asked in his daily briefing about the condition of the well bore.  He said there, “So what I would tell you is we don’t know exactly the condition of the well bore. And that’s one of the unknowns that we’re managing around in terms of risks.  And that’s the reason we didn’t go, didn’t go to excessive pressures on the top kill and decided that we’d deal with containment and then go for the final relief well.”

According to Admiral Allen: "I think that one thing that nobody knows is the condition of the well bore from below the blowout preventer down to the actual oil field itself.  And we don’t know, we don’t know if the well bore has been compromised or not."

What the BP document suggests that if the well bore is compromised or becomes compromised, we now know we could be looking at a flow rate 100 times BP's initial estimate.  Even if we can't know for certain the condition of the well bore, we should have known how much oil could flow from it--BP did.

“When the oil spill started, BP said it was only 1,000 barrels a day. Now we know it could end up being 100 times larger than that in a worst-case scenario,” said Markey. “This document raises very troubling questions about what BP knew and when they knew it. It is clear that, from the beginning, BP has not been straightforward with the government or the American people about the true size of this spill. Now the families living and working in the Gulf are suffering from their incompetence.”

“BP needs to tell us what it will do if the well bore is compromised and 100,000 barrels per day of oil spills into the ocean.
At this point, we need real contingency planning, not a plan with dead scientists and walruses,” said Markey.

 

Smoking gun BP exhibits:

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 06/21/2010 - 08:57 | 424789 Garbo
Garbo's picture

With news that there were problems with the oil rig weeks before the explosion, and the fact that Halliburton bought a oil spill company days before the explosion, it sounds like it was rigged to fail! 

Mon, 06/21/2010 - 09:36 | 424834 yabs
yabs's picture
by RichardP
on Mon, 06/21/2010 - 06:46
#424215

 

You are commenting and you think there is at least a billion barrels down there?  The conventional wisdom about the size of the oil field has been posted here and at theoildrum.com many times (and it is much bigger than what you state).  But you don't know??  Yet you speculate anyway.  Why should we pay attention to what you say?

There are facts available about what is going on in the gulf.  It would probably be good if you found some of them so they can inform your opinion

 

so my speculation was correct

I work in the industry so unless it was at LEASt a billion it would not be worth drilling there

thats all I said AT LEAST yet you get angry when you say its more

i havn't got time to read everything

so it proves that left unstopped it will flow for years

so whats your problem?

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 17:47 | 447697 tooppy
tooppy's picture

After so many months I am surprised and sick everybody still swallow BP story & videos. I am surprised that none of the countless off-shore drillers / pundits all around the world have expressed their view on this. So here are mine, after a bunch of years working on drilling rigs.

You have a blow out !!!! This means you have a crater down there !!! There is no more BOP, drill pipes, reiser or base plate, the all thing has sank into the hole !!! Worse still where is the rig ???? BP is so good at showing such nice videos at this lightless depth in the middle of the fat sticky oil, SHOW ME THE RIG !!!!!!!!!

WHERE IS THE RIG  ???    SHOW IT TO ME !!!!

Example of a blow out in Nigeria in the seventies, sea bed at 180meters, gas blow out for a week, back to location the sonar limit 500meters had NO echo back. This means the sea bed was then deeper than 500m, so the minimum crater diameter was 960m.... !!!!  Big enough ??? Big enough to swallow three rigs  !

Now stop all these stupid articles, there is no technical solution, the only one is to pump, pump, pump as much as possible and as long as it will last. This leak will stop when both pressures equilized .

All the best

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!