Israel Knesset Member Declares "We Are Preparing For War"

Tyler Durden's picture

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sudden Debt's picture

Obama will wait until the first nuclear bomb explodes in New York.

After that, he'll decided that every America should excuse them self to Iran and offer 60square miles at the centre of Washington for Iranians to build a peaceful army base to show they mean well.

And as a second peace offering he will allow all Iranian men in America the option of first choice of American woman.


= sarcasm off =

nmewn's picture

I'm glad this little trivial matter didn't interrupt Obama's tenth vacation this year...LOL.

jeff montanye's picture

he and w. have more in common as time goes by.

BobWatNorCal's picture

Disagree heartily.

Obama is making Bush look good.

themosmitsos's picture

Bush shoulda done it. DEFINITION of bullshit chicken-hawk. Where was Cheney? Israel won't succeed. Escalation.

Rapture bitchez

barkingbill's picture

why on earth should anyone "do it". isn't it time we moved on from the neoconservative pipedream of spending billions and losing soldiers and killing civilians just to eliminate israels tin pot enemies?

knukles's picture

He holdeth my head under deep water,
He stealeth my soul.

Bearster's picture

Good luck explaining it to all the hair-shirted "pacifists" who believe in peace in our time, peace with honor.  Mr. Achmadinejad's sense of reason can be appealed to, and surely there are moderates in his regime.  I am sure they just want electrical power generation.  Pay no heed to their constant threats or their ballistic missile program.  Or their low-level proxy war against Israel via Hezbollah.  Or that Mr. Achmadinejad talks about the apocalypse the way geeks talk about the latest product from Apple...

Hedge Jobs's picture

are you going to sign up for this war bearster since you feel so strongly about it? They could put you on the front line and you can post a comment from one of those ditches the Iranians dug a few weeks ago.

zaknick's picture


Well put. F@ck the Zionist big noses.

citationneeded's picture

I don't know what's with your nose fetish man. Bringing it up twice in one weekend now? I mean, Ahmadinejad has got one as big as any.'s picture

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad revealed to have Jewish past

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's vitriolic attacks on the Jewish world hide an astonishing secret, evidence uncovered by The Daily Telegraph shows.

citationneeded's picture

I can link to random UK newspapers too!


Ahmadinejad has no Jewish roots

Rumours that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's family converted to Islam from Judaism are false. In fact, they are proud Shias's picture

I can link to random UK newspapers too!


But you didn't link to a random UK newspaper. You linked to a Guardian article which does a pretty good job of disputing the Telegraph article I referenced.

Both articles would seem to have their merits and I could not say with confidence that one or the other can be called definitive. I thank you for sharing the information.

Village Idiot's picture

I think ol' Crockett may have really just been making the suggestion that there is a reason for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's big nose.  "Disingenuous at best," isn't that one of your lines, Crockett?


on Sun, 08/22/2010 - 19:43


Well put. F@ck the Zionist big noses.

by citationneeded
on Sun, 08/22/2010 - 20:00

I don't know what's with your nose fetish man. Bringing it up twice in one weekend now? I mean, Ahmadinejad has got one as big as any.

on Sun, 08/22/2010 - 20:19

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad revealed to have Jewish past

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's vitriolic attacks on the Jewish world hide an astonishing secret, evidence uncovered by The Daily Telegraph shows.'s picture

What does disingenuousness have to do with it?

Village Idiot's picture

I re-read the thread - you are right.  You were just pointing out a reason for the man having a big nose.  Question:  Why bother getting mixed up with a "nose" issue, Crockett?'s picture

My priorities begin with "anything for a laugh." Of course, I say that as an American of German Irish descent with a well proportioned proboscis.



Now listen to me, you smooth-talking son-of-a-bitch! Let me lay it on the line for you and your boss, whoever he is. Johnny Fontane will never get that movie! I don't care how many daigo guinea WOP greaseball gumbahs come out of the woodwork!




I'm German-Irish...




Well let me tell you something my Kraut Mick friend, I'm gonna make so much trouble for

you, you won't know what hit you!

quintago's picture

yeah having a big nose has nothing to do with the persian empire being over-run by Muslims and their big noses. Perhaps they were over-run by the jews before that in a 300 type of takeover.

dkny's picture

Both articles would seem to have their merits and I could not say with confidence that one or the other can be called definitive.

Yes, but apparently once suspected for being a Jew there is no way back.
Kinda like being labeled a Communist by McCarthy, isn't it?'s picture

Why do you believe that such a conclusion is apparent?

RichyRoo's picture

Because the first article make a lot of claims which the second article demolishes. Hence the first article is worthless, and yet someone claims they 'both have merit'. No they dont, the first makes claims which the second effectively refutes, leaving us back where we started, with no reason to belive he is Jewish.'s picture

If nothing else, the first article tells us that Imadinnerjacket's family made some change in their identity which is interesting in and of itself and therefore has merit. Did you know this before you read the article? If you fear Imadinnerjacket don't you want as much background as possible on him?

Also, can you prove that everything in the first article is false and everything in the second is true? Just because one attempts to refute an argument does not mean that one has refuted an argument. If you really believe that than this refutation of your argument by me proves that you are wrong and without merit.

dkny's picture

Like I said: once suspected as a Jew, there is practically no way to remove the suspicion.
Alas, who am I kidding? You're the guy who believes that the Wehrmacht was packed full of pure, practicing Jews.'s picture

But you know for a fact that 150,000 jews and half-jews did serve in Hitler's army. Why do you so despise the truth?

dkny's picture

And how many full/half/etc Italian and Germans served in the US Armed forces in WW2, conspiracy boy?'s picture

What makes you think there is a conspiracy? It's just a historic fact. Why does this fact make you so angry?

dkny's picture

Amazing how you avoid commenting on the makeup of the US Armed forces in WW2. Keep up the charade that you're merely stating facts without any opinion behind them.'s picture

What's so amazing? Lots of German American and Italian Americans and Japanese Americans served in the US armed forces in WWII. It's a fact. Would you like confirmation that that water is wet, too?

Why does the fact that 150,000 jews and half jews served in Hitler's army enrage you to so much?

dkny's picture

LOL @ "enrage".

Then I suppose that your brain is as devoid of opinion when you state that fact, just as when you state that water is wet. Or are you merely in the habit of dropping "facts" out of nowhere in certain kind of discussions and that one just happened to be next on the list, as opposed to, for example, "the sky is blue"?

Like I said: keep up the charade.'s picture



Please consider going back on your medication.

dkny's picture

LOL @ you classic avoidance tactic.

I can't wait for your next context-free "fact" spewing session.'s picture



The context will be there for those wise enough to see it.

dkny's picture

More empty words from the world greatest fact book.

Can't wait for the next time you turn tail when I push you about your "facts".'s picture




You can't even post a readable message. How damned dumb are you, anyway?

drB's picture

How about Pakistan? They already have the bomb. Want war also there? Why only Iran? Why not, for example, North Korea? Ah, forgot...neither Pakistan nor North Korea have OIL!!!

rawsienna's picture

Perhaps because Pakistan has not threatened to wipe another country off the face of the earth.  North Korea - well they may be isolated and impoverished but they are controlled by China .  

AnonymousAnarchist's picture

Neither has Iran. Do you believe all nonsense spewed by the statist media? Let me guess... you also think the war in Iraq is over.

assembler's picture

You are the one deceived by your holocaust denying, revisionist friends.

AnonymousAnarchist's picture

Your comment posted before you were able to complete your point and explain to me how I have been deceived.

luigi's picture

Agreed, or that Iraq had WMD to start with... (maybe he was that sure because he saw Hallyburton's delivery bills?)

Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle's picture

If you remember, we used to talk a lot of smack to the Soviet Union, and they'd reply likewise, back in the day.  Besides, Israel already has 200 nukes.