You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

It’s Tough to Put Lipstick on this Pig

madhedgefundtrader's picture




 President Obama could not have looked more morose in reacting to the news that the December nonfarm payroll showed a further loss of 85,000 jobs, taking the unemployment rate to 10%.

It’s really tough to put lipstick on this pig. Some 4.2 million have lost jobs on Obama’s watch, and 7.2 million since the recession began in December, 2007. Total unemployment now stands at 15.3 million, and 25 million if you used the U6 figure that includes discouraged workers. Some 661,000 dropped out of the workforce, the duration of unemployment lengthened, and what real hiring did occur, was only among temporary workers, who gained 47,000 jobs.

These are not exactly the sort of numbers that are going to send you shooting out of the blocks in the sprint towards the midterm elections. It is screamingly obvious now that while big business has stopped large scale layoffs, they are just plain not hiring. Perhaps they see the same thing as me, the deadening impact of a slowdown in government spending, or worse, a double dip recession, that would kill them if they started adding overhead now.

They have also probably figured out that starving, bankrupt consumers don’t buy much. Perversely, this means that productivity will keep soaring, as will corporate profits, which is how the stock market was able to hold its own today, despite the dismal figures.

There is no doubt that the administration will take the message home that not only was the last Keynesian inspired stimulus package too small, another one is needed immediately. But you can bet the next one will be far more jobs focused than the last, which had more pork than a Chicago slaughterhouse. How about a new interstate system? That would be nice. Conservatives will be outraged, insisting that the only way to economic salvation is to put more money in consumers’ pockets though tax cuts.

This will certainly mean bigger deficits, followed by more borrowing, and then higher taxes. It also makes the Fed’s public discussion about winding down quantitative easing a bit awkward. Expect zero interest rates to take on a new lease on life.

 

 




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 22:04 | Link to Comment RoastingBankers
RoastingBankers's picture

you cant put lipstick on it but you can slaughter it and have a bbq

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 21:50 | Link to Comment john_connor
john_connor's picture

O presidency = higher unemployment and higher energy and food prices.  Complete bond and equity collapse to follow.

EPIC FAIL.

On another note, Madhedgefundetrader, where was your house in Tahoe?  I lived on the north shore for almost 3 years.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 21:20 | Link to Comment Winston Smith 2009
Winston Smith 2009's picture

It was too much to ask to have the last stimulus dedictated 100% to an area that would be most beneficial in the long run, infrastructure repair, and it will remain too much to ask for the next one.  Pork rules our bought and paid for "representatives" in government.

If you haven't watched "The Crumbling of America" on the History Channel, you should.  Our infrastructure is literally rotting away.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 12:43 | Link to Comment TruthHunter
TruthHunter's picture


"unless someone quickly invents a technology to harvest heavy oil economically (eg at break even of $50) - our time is up.  game over."

 

Actually a cheap, portable, safe reactor technology was developed in

the 60's(LFTR Thorium reactor).  This passive regulated cycle without the need of

a pressure vessel, creates  very little long term waste.

This compact low pressure system could

be used for a heat source to extract heavy oil.  

I also remember hearing about a promising Fusion Reaction that was suppressed.

I'm  not talking "Cold Fusion" either.  Apparently, its better to be dependent on imported

energy and create Jobs Programs for Physicist than solve the energy crisis.

 

We are sitting on huge reserves in North Dakota and (rumor has it) on the North

Slope.  Could it be that someone decided that Energy Independence wasn't

good for America?

 

Maybe Christopher Story's and other Conspiracy Theories are right.

THEY are out to get us!

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 20:55 | Link to Comment dnarby
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 12:21 | Link to Comment primus
primus's picture

The US is already failed state. 30 years of 'kick the can' policy is coming home to roost and it won't be pretty. SS, Medicare & gluttonous pentagon budgets have already bankrupted us.

There is no way out. More Keynesian money drops from Time's Man of the Year will eventually lead to higher interest rates or currency implosion and austerity now will send the country into a real depression. To top that off, peak oil, the China / Russia / Middle East complex will make it all irrelevent anyway.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 10:47 | Link to Comment smokeybear
smokeybear's picture

The only alternative to government spending at this point in the cycle is an instant hyperdeflationary depression -- which is the eventual outcome regardless of these temporary machinations.

The end of a fiat money system looks much like the beginning.....

Except for the bottomless abyss.

 

0.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 10:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 10:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 10:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 10:13 | Link to Comment virgilcaine
virgilcaine's picture

Obama needs to Fire his Economic team, this is the worst performance of any President by far. They've made the situation worse not better. 

2 Trillion spent and he couldnt create a single Job?  pathetc.

 

Not to sound too harsh but they decided to become the gatekeeper of the Economy so  it all goes back to them. 

 

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 11:51 | Link to Comment TexasAggie
TexasAggie's picture

Why fire his economic team.  They have given us exactly what he campaigned on: Hope and Change.  Hope to keep your job or change in your pocket because you don't have a job.

He is trying to destroy the economy so that his team can remake it as a communist economy that will supposedly work this time.  Remember, all of the communist loving professors after the fall of the Berlin wall said that the Russian version didn't work but that our version would work.

 

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 17:13 | Link to Comment Andrei Vyshinsky
Andrei Vyshinsky's picture

What kind of a schmendrik are you, anyway? Spare us, please, the all-too-obvious Republican agit-prop. Most adults past emotional age 21 today understand that the contention of political parties in this country simply serves to mask the reality of the common interests driving them both. Obama is about as much of a Communist as Hjalmar Schacht. He and his Democratic Party entourage are simply the tool of the corporate and foreign policy interests that paid his way in the last election. Do you really think that McCain and the Republicans had they been elected would have been any different? If so, you've been asleep for eight of the last nine years. If you're going to take Obama to task - and he deserves to be taken to task - at least take off that brownshirt you're wearing. No one's conned.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 19:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 10:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 09:46 | Link to Comment sbmeder
sbmeder's picture

Not sure why it is so hard for many folks to understand why there are no jobs being created, when the goal of corporate America for the last decade was to outsource the jobs and find new cheaper overseas suppliers they destroyed the infrastructure needed to create jobs, the only jobs that were kept in America were the realtors, mortgage bankers and builders that were paid for with easy money and fraudulent transactions. Most of these jobs will not be coming back. We are about to lose another 8K jobs here in the space coast of FL when the shuttle stops flying, can't wait to see what that does to housing values here.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 09:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 08:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 17:08 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

1. Do we kow what the effect of the massive growth in both the size and length of term of unemployment benefits?  yes, more deficit spending, greater debt.

It's starting to look like a reasonable lifestyle to go on foodstamps, unemployment, other govt benefits, and quit looking for work altogether. Most Americans do NOT want this lifestyle.  They would rather work. 

I know a couple in NY (considered a very liberal state) and the income levels to receive food stamps are very low, somewhere around the mid 20k per year range for a couple with 2 kids.  This couple was getting unemployment insurance, one at approx 200 per week, the other at the NY max of 430 and they did not qualify for food stamps and they have 2 kids.  they lost unemployment for a while (before it was just restarted) and got food stamps.  as soon as the unemployment benefits kicked back in, their file was reworked and they were disqualified.

I don't know all the details about Medicare in NY, but my limited understanding is you have to be pretty close to broke to qualify.

Interestingly, assets are taken into consideration for qualifying for Medicare but assets do not count for food stamps.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 04:49 | Link to Comment George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Putting lipstick on a pig to make it look like it can fly?  Do we understand the GRAVITY of the situation?

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 03:58 | Link to Comment jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

if i remember correctly, tyler had a post indicating the potential for this jobs number to be positive, possibly big positive, based on the seasonal adjustment factors and other technical stuff, as opposed to actual job creation, with the months following winding down and into negative territory again based on same.  does this mean the numbers are slated to be even worse in the coming months (again ex the actual job creation/loss)?

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 03:30 | Link to Comment torabora
torabora's picture

ponzi

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 03:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 01:14 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Businesses and individuals have also no doubt figured out that at some point someone is going to have to PAY for all the stimulus, and guess who that is going to be?

Nothing kills economic incentives more than a high federal debt that promises to impose more and higher taxes in the future, regardless of the tax burden today.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 01:07 | Link to Comment glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

We can't afford stimulus 2, we couldn't afford stimulus 1. I think this time the public outcry will be deafening and if it actually passes will be the dealth knell for many congressional positions.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 00:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 00:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 00:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:45 | Link to Comment delacroix
delacroix's picture

1800 layoffs @ ups, what does he consider large scale layoffs. and more at berkshire hathaway.unemployment, is as close to a bottom, as real estate.  obama's jobs program, will probably include a massive recruiting drive, for the military.job security, until a bomb or a bullet ruins your day.the benefits, always sound better going in.

Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:11 | Link to Comment Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

Agree with your take madhedgefundtrader except for the part about a new interstate highway system.  That would actually add productive capacity.  Stimulus is about 1) paying off benefactors, 2) adding debt, 3) raising taxes, and 4) extending the recession.

Stimulus 3 will be like stimulus 2, used to subsidize states and buy cheese for the ever-growing ranks of shelters.

It's all about power. Never waste a good crisis.

Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 19:13 | Link to Comment A Nanny Moose
A Nanny Moose's picture

It works for the politically connected that is.

Even WWII did not end TGD 1.0. It largely was our intact productive capacity afterward, and giving up on failed programs to artificially prop up prices in a deflationary environment.

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 16:12 | Link to Comment walküre
walküre's picture

Do we need a massive war effort first is the question.

WW2 was mainly about securing oil supplies. Make no mistake.

With oil surging, dollar declining, new emerging power threatening US dominance.. you do the math.

Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 17:48 | Link to Comment sepmeier
sepmeier's picture

WW2 was a great stimulus, no doubt, since the entire product of industry here was used to blow up the rest of the then-developed world's industrial capacity, leaving the US standing without competition when the dust settled.  Oh, and we imported no energy then.  And we were a creditor nation, even going in, not the largest debtor.

That you state the "private sector doesnt create money" indicates you don't understand  fractional reserve banking and how it has worked for the past few hundred years.  Banks - private sector banks - create money every time they fund a loan and created far more money than government during that time.  Creating money is what banks do.  See "M3" ...

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 22:58 | Link to Comment Orly
Orly's picture

It has been proven that there is a fairly strict Law of Diminishing Returns in regards to stimulating the economy.  Once most of that infrastructure has been built (i.e., gun factories and tank factories...), it takes more stimulus to stimulate per basis point of GDP due to sheer enormity.

Kind of like a drug addict has to have more each time to catch a buzz, it is the same with fiscal stimulus.

There is no WWIII that can possibly get us out of this mess without billions of people being killed and destruction the likes of which have never been seen.

Either option won't work.  The only thing that will get us out of this mess is retiring this deadwood overhang, allowing well-connected banks to fail and bringing equilibrium to the housing market by allowing prices to fall to a natural level.

That is going to be painful enough.

Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 22:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 22:51 | Link to Comment sepmeier
sepmeier's picture

A new Interstate Highway System? 

How about some support of enhanced interstate passenger rail service, spur lines and turning those stupid bike paths that were laid down on rights of way back into track?  Establishment of local / regional rail freight warehousing, so when JIT warehousing on wheels falls apart with $10/g diesel we can keep some products moving?  How about felling the millions and millions and millions of standing-dead beetle-killed lodgepole pines covering the Rocky Mountain west - now that would take some people off the UI rolls - so we can chip the dead wood while it still has some energy content, then gasify and burn it - carbon neutrally - in coal fired power plants? 

How about let's stop bullsh!ting ourselves about global oil production rates and if we're going to blow the Treasury, spend a little money and time getting civilization ready for life with less fundamental liquid energy input?

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 16:58 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

It is you Bill.

How is GF doing these days?

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 17:38 | Link to Comment sepmeier
sepmeier's picture

I left there a year ago to teach solar technology at CMC.  GF went offline as an operating division on 8/1/09, though fortunately, the parent firm's satcom distribution business is still breaking records - Via Satellite has a great interview with Fred in this month's issue!

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 00:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 20:53 | Link to Comment dnarby
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 23:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 22:47 | Link to Comment spanish inquisition
spanish inquisition's picture

End of the year... load up (or account shift) more unemployment into December and use the excess to declare future victories well into the new year!

Sat, 01/09/2010 - 00:55 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 01/08/2010 - 22:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sat, 01/09/2010 - 01:16 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

You would think someone would figure that out by now.

Keynesianism is a real mental disease, isn't it?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!