This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
It's Going To Implode: Buy Physical Gold - NOW
For previous articles by the author go to: Gordon Gekko's Blog
Evidence seems to be mounting that we are headed towards some sort of implosion in the paper Gold market, and perhaps the currency/bond markets in general. Let’s take a look:
Jacksonville, FL based EverBank – a bank with approximately $8 billion in assets and 1800 employees according to the company website – recently sent this notice to customers (courtesy of Warren Bevan):
"Non-FDIC Insured Metals Select Changes" -
Section 6.3.7. General Terms: We have added language clarifying our right to close your account. We may close your Metals Select Account at anytime upon reasonable notice to you. If we believe that it is necessary to close your account immediately in order to limit losses by you or us [GG: We really don’t give a s**t about you; it’s us that we care about], we may close your account prior to providing notice to you. Notice from us to one of you is notice to all of you [GG: the nerve of these people!]. If we close your account, we reserve the right to convert your Precious Metals to U.S. dollars and tender the balance to you by mail [GG: I am willing to bet my entire Gold stash that when you receive these "converted" dollars, they will be nowhere near the market price of physical. What did you think that whole "limit losses" thing meant?] .
If you have a "Non FDIC Insured Metals Select" account with these people, you can pretty much say goodbye to any chances of ever seeing your metal. This is a clear sign that the (already tight) availability of physical metal at the manipulated Comex futures paper price is in danger of vanishing altogether. Think about it. What is the scenario in which they avoid catastrophic losses while at the same time sending you the US dollar value of the metal? When the official or Comex price has fully decoupled from the physical price. Expect to see more such notices from banks offering Metals "Investments".
Citibank recently issued this notice to its checking account (remember the type of account where you thought you could withdraw your money whenever you wanted? Well, not anymore) customers (via Market Ticker):
Withdrawal Notice:
We reserve the right to require seven (7) days advance notice before permitting a withdrawal from all checking, savings and money market accounts. We currently do not exercise this right and have not exercised it in the past.

Hmm…let me see. Why would a bank need to impose withdrawal restrictions? Has this kind of a thing happened before somewhere? Could it be because of the danger of a bank run/capital flight from the United States? Why would Citibank fear bank runs? Why would money flee the US banking system/US? Could it be because the entire US banking system and the US Government is INSOLVENT and people - fearing a collapse in the dollar’s value (in terms of real goods i.e. for all you Prechterites out there) - rush to withdraw money convert it into real goods such as precious metals? You tell me. Also, could they maybe increase this notice period from seven to whatever the hell they want whenever they want? What will you do then? Even if you don’t buy Gold with it, withdrawing your cash from America’s insolvent banks is a very wise strategy at this point.
One of Mish’s readers Construction Insider recently sent him this little nugget:
Hi Mish
I work in the construction business and something has been creeping to the forefront of my attention for the past few weeks and now it seems to be moving full steam ahead.
Banks are forcing developers/builders (especially smaller ones) to give up their properties (unsold homes and lots).
Banks say the reason is that the properties in question are no longer performing assets. I am sure there are some loans out there that are not performing and the owners are going under. I am equally sure that there are plenty of developers that are still selling homes - just not at the pace originally planned on the pro formas.
Having inside information on one of these scenarios that happened today, I cannot help but wonder what is really going on? The bank told a small developer/builder I work for that they were taking back his ongoing subdivision.
He is selling houses and updated pro formas would indicate that the current sales pace would exhaust all remaining lots within 33 months. Yet the bank stated they would only give him until April 15 to find alternative financing. The bank is also willing to let him buy the subdivision at a 33% discount to what is currently owed.
If he is unable to obtain this backing, the bank will let him walk away without penalty or consequence so they can write it off.
I have been on the phone trying to put some of these pieces together. It seems there are many banks doing the same thing. However, there is apparently no interest [or ability - Mish] from anyone wanting to pick up land/lots at 30% - 50% discounts to today's prices.
Another interesting point is that the banks all state that they must have these situations written off or taken care of by the end of Q2.
Looks to me like DaBoyz are calling in the loans while the currency still has some value. Does the government plan some type of overt currency devaluation or expect the dollar to collapse on the currency markets of its own sorry weight? The cracks are already appearing in the Bond market. Foreigners are increasingly fleeing the Treasury auctions. The only thing keeping them going is manufactured "deflation" fears from time-to-time. A recent 30 year auction (10th February, 2010 to be precise) practically failed. This is what Mr. Denninger had to say about it:
Bad. Actually, let's go worse than bad and call it what it is - by any definition this is just one step off from "Failed."
The more-worrying factor here is that we've got this "mystery" direct buyers out here again taking nearly 25% of the offered amount (who is bidding for that undisclosed?) and another 11% taken down by The Fed for the SOMA account.
Yet even with this Treasury had to pay up to get it to go and the bid-to-cover was anemic at best.
Given the Primary Dealer system we have in this country, any BTC under 2.0 is an effective fail. To get an auction that behaves in this sort of fashion, complete with mystery direct bidders and heavy SOMA (Fed) participation, yet Treasury has to pay up in the form of a significantly higher coupon is not a good sign at all.
And this is what happened on 23rd February, 2010 for a 4-week $37 billion Treasury Bill auction (Per Graham Summers):
There are times in life when one witnesses something so outside the scope of normal experience, that at first you don’t see it.
Captain Cook’s diaries tell us that upon first seeing his ships offshore in Australia, the aborigines expressed “neither surprise nor concern.” Cook notes that it was not until he and his men approached the shore in smaller, more familiar vessels that the villagers reacted, arming themselves as “the sight of men in small boats was comprehensible to them: it meant invasion.”
Well, I had a similar experience during yesterday’s bond auction.
Roughly, 27% of the auction took place at the highest rate. This means nearly one third of the demand from competitive bidders (those who care about yield) came at the HIGHEST yield that was accepted. In plain terms, this alone tells you that investors want higher yields from Treasuries since nearly a full third of the debt issuance took place at the highest REQUIRED yield.
Of the competitive bids (meaning those bids coming from folks who care about yield), roughly 70% went to Primary Dealers (investors who HAVE to buy the debt and who usually turn around and try to sell it afterwards). To put this number into perspective here is the percentage of competitive purchases made by Primary Dealers in the last four 4-week Treasury issuances:
...yesterday’s auction featured MORE buys from Primary Dealers than almost any of those occurring in 2010. Remember, Primary Dealers HAVE to buy Treasuries. So to see them buying a high percentage of Treasuries at debt auctions means that few investors who can pick and choose what to buy are actually looking to buy US debt.
Of the remaining competitive buys (about $8.86 billion), only 32% came from Direct Bidders or those who bought debt directly from the Treasury: orders that can easily be tracked. The other 68% ($5.9 billion) came from Indirect Bidders: folks who we cannot track.
Even more bizarre, only $5.9 billion in Indirect Bidder competitive buys were ACTUALLY OFFERED. So we had a 100% acceptance rate for Indirect Bidder competitive buys.
Let’s put this in perspective:
This means that the Treasury took up EVERY single cent of competitive bids coming from indirect buyers. Remember, indirect buyers are usually assumed to be foreign governments (even the Treasury website admits this).
If this was the case yesterday, then foreign governments barely bought much of anything in yesterday’s auction (only 19% of total debt issued). Moreover, it implies that Primary Dealers (those having to buy) had to gorge on the auction to make up for the fact that few if any foreign governments are interested in buying our debt anymore (including even short-term debt).
So basically the demand from the indirects (i.e. foreigners) for US Debt is drying up and the Treasury is taking all of whatever miniscule amounts they are offering. As if that was not enough, we had another similar auction on 9th Match, 2010 (via zerohedge):
Two weeks after the indirect hit ratio in the 4 week auction came at a record 100%, today it was once again at almost at the all time possible high, with Indirect Bids of just $6.744 billion taking down $6.683 billion, resulting in a 99.1% hit ratio. The chart of the recent Indirect hit ratio in recent 4 week bill auctions is attached:
Dear Extended Family,I believe the most important event at our Toronto CIGA meeting was the testimony of two attendees.Two men spoke independently. One is a Canadian resident from Russia and the other from Poland.
Both said the same thing, "All the signs that preceded our inflation of more than 100% per year are here now in the West."
What more do you need to know?
Regards,Jim
Fast approaching is the event of GAME OVER for London, a condition that has already reached critical level, according to a key reliable source of information with London connections and direct experience with its market events. How long can a major metals exchange sell contracts but have miniscule supply of gold in their vaulted possession? The paper gold market and the physical gold bullion market have finally separated in a practical manner, meaning actual gold has almost no role anymore in London paper contract settlement. The absence of gold in London requires extraordinary tactics to settle contracts and to obtain gold bullion. Red tape procedures delay delivery for individuals, and bribes accompany gold delivery demands as standard practice. The London Bullion Market Assn has almost zero gold, its supply having been drained in high volumes since early December, a process currently in acceleration. The opportunity to convert fiat money into precious metal at prices considered reasonable is also vanishing. The London gold banker said,"There is going on a lot more than meets the eye. The physical system is actually consolidating bigtime and is organizing itself with lightning speed, totally hidden from pretty much anyone, even the so-called insiders. The paper precious metal market and the physical precious metal market have defacto disconnected. The paper and physical gold markets currently operate in parallel universes. The outflow of physical metal from bank vaults is happening at a mind bending pace."
- Gordon_Gekko's blog
- 105505 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -





yep, a whole lot of people will become lead farmers.
What's the endgame? Do they inbreed on these islands? Do they just die out after x years?
Are you implying that inbreeding would be new to them?
Do you have a direct line to the Fed? Din't think so. And just because you see people at ZH saying something doesn't mean you should follow it blindly without doing due diligence.
Good Point!
Must be nice to be smarter than John Paulson, George Soros and other who own GLD. They certainly have deeper resources than you and therefore have a more informed edge than you. And in Paulson's case, the credibility to say they called the crisis.
Do you seriously think you know more than these guys? All I read here is stridently expressed opinions.
My money is with the guy plunking down $3 billion on GLD - not the guy with the Michael Douglas avatar.
Sorry.
Mr. Paulson owns more GLD than is required to have "a basket" (from the GLD prospectus). Owning a basket or several baskets allows MR Paulson to convert his "baskets to the real gold in the GLD warehouse. Do you own enough GLD to convert to real gold? If you don't then perhaps you might want to consider the tip of John Exeter's pyramid. The less counterparty risk in this time might be a better choice.
PTAUAG
And do you not think Soros and all are not going to jump off the train when it heads off the cliff? They'll ride this thing to the very end. Put two and two together, you see. Soros thinks gold is in bubble state, and goes in feet first-why would he? Aha, there is much to gain while the train is a movin and you know when to jump off...
Soros never said gold was in a bubble, he said gold is the Ultimate Bubble.
ul·ti·mate
1.
last; furthest or farthest; ending a process or series: the ultimate point in a journey; the ultimate style in hats.
2.
maximum; decisive; conclusive: the ultimate authority; the ultimate weapon.
3.
highest; not subsidiary: ultimate goal in life.
4.
basic; fundamental; representing a limit beyond which further progress, as in investigation or analysis, is impossible: the ultimate particle; ultimate principles.
5.
final; total: the ultimate consequences; the ultimate cost of a project.
6.
not to be improved upon or surpassed; greatest; unsurpassed: the ultimate vacation spot; the ultimate stupidity.
In lizard speak, he's saying the same thing as GG/AN/FOFOA.
Crowd stands and applauds.
Won der ful catch Anon.
Do not equate wealth with intelligence, if that were the case the Australian Aborigine and the Canadian Inuit would be the smartest races on earth. While I am definitely not insulting their intelligence by any means, they do not stick out with their per capita intelligence as much as they do with their per capita wealth
Do not equate wealth with intelligence, if that were the case the Australian Aborigine and the Canadian Inuit would be the smartest races on earth. While I am definitely not insulting their intelligence by any means, they do not stick out with their per capita intelligence as much as they do with their per capita wealth
Do you honestly think these parties don't have physical too? If they have 30% physical and 70% paper gold, and they lose all their paper in the rise, they're still going to do VERY well. Also, note that through the manipulation of paper, they can ensure physical rises to the moon. You're right, they aren't dumb. They have strategies you've not thought of.
Anon-
Do you really think Sorros and J Paulson arent on Geithners speed-dial list?
So, have you decided to ignore the first part of the essay regarding banking and Treasuries?
Do you think Paulson and Soros never made a wrong call?
Do you think they actually do not have any Physical?
I also remind you that most of the heavyweights didn't see our
current crisis coming. let alone the one currently building up.
I have found that the big boys are strictly in the box thinkers,
which has served them well in the past, but no longer works,
because this time, it is different. I also sense that the in the box
thinkers are just now coming to the realization that this time,
it really is different.Gov't RFC on confiscation of retirement funds
has awaken a few that I know... The current budget deficit just can't be ignored, and I fully expect it to increase as the financial load on our welfare state continues to get bigger. I see no sign
of Congress becoming fiscally responsible, none at all....
Congress is spending like Drunken Sailors.
Show me the guy plunking down 3 billion on gold.
Soros has 487 MILLION, or 1/6, or 16.6% of what you claim.
Less than 2% of his assets...
I've got a great investment tip for you MB. Convert ALL of your holdings to pound sterling, take possession, and stuff them in your mattress.
Soros dips his balls in gold for fun.
that would make golden sacks wouldn't it?
HAHAHAHA! I'll set 'em up, you knock 'em down! sheeet.........
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA FAG!
I am Chumbawamba.
As has been said before--- Soros is going to do his famous grab onto the last tree branch as he leads all of you stupid little lemmings right off the clif!!
Have fun with that!!
Paulson and Soros can effectively control GLD and if there's any shortage they will certainly be paid first. If you're also a billionaire, go ahead.
David Einhorn sold his GLD stake and bought physical (I forget when). You can expect these guys to switch at a moments notice too - unless they have CB guarantees on the metal - without giving you any advance notice, mentioning it in some obscure corner of some filing long after the s--t has hit the fan.
Hey GG, not to rain on your parade, I like the idea of some phisical...But David Einhorn is the same who bought himself a good chunk of New Century and sat on his board just right before it crashed and burned. J.P. Paulson was on the other side of that trade...I wouldn't quote Einhorn as an unfettered, unblemished genius...in MHO.
What about CEF which I believe actually purchase 60% gold and 40% silver?
make sure you have some physical first.. but yes, CEF seems like you can trade as it rises more than the rest.. at least for a while
What about the Aussie one?
http://www.asx.com.au/products/pdf/etfs_fact_sheet_physical_gold.pdf
http://thelastcanary.blogspot.com
CEF is my only paper holding for my Roth 401K. I believe it will be one of the few paper gold securities to stand up to this coming divergence that GG speaks about.
From what I've heard, it might be better than GLD, although I can't say for sure. Still doesn't beat personal possession IMHO.
Any take on IAU?
I've actually read the entire prospectus and they do say that the agreement with the custodian is to have no more than 400 ounces unallocated at the end of the day, and any sub-custodians used must have adhere to the same requirements (if I recall, GLD didn't really care what happened with those).
Thanks.
They will be made whole, or nearly so. You will not!
These guys are leveraged gamblers, with loads of cash to put to work. They couldnt' get $3Bn of "physical" exposure if they tried, I would vouch.
Therefore, paper leverage is the way to go, with a direct bailout guaranteed by the Fed, for "systemic" reasons of course, in the case of failure.
Paulson converted his GLD position into physical.
Kinda defeats the argument of GG dontcha think?
No it does not.
GG is right: Buy.Gold.Now.
In these awful and weird times, anyone who does not have, say, AT LEAST 3% of his net worth in gold, better yet the 5% - 10% commonly advocated, is unwise. Physical gold only under your own possession.
3% ??? You must be kidding, right? Even 5% to 10%... you must be kidding. Beyond what you need for spending money, why hold totally bogus worthless pieces of paper when you can hold real, physical, eternally valuable yellow metal? Those low numbers for gold were invented by stock brokers who, when faced by an investor who ***demanded*** to hold gold, wanted access to at least 95% of his suckers wealth when he couldn't get 100%.
What is the appropriate precentage to have in physical gold today? At least 100%.
"What is the appropriate precentage to have in physical gold today? At least 100%."
Really?! That's your MINIMUM? What's your maximum then I wonder?
Well, I don't like leverage, and I never borrow on my credit card other otherwise. So 100% is right for me, but perhaps some brave folks would be very wise to buy gold or silver on any big pullback with one of those "6-months no interest" credit cards they keep trying to jam down our throats.
Personally, I'm alergic to debt.
Not if you're not named ONE OF THOSE GUYS. You think they don't hold some physical? Really? You think they are "smarter" than Jim Rickards? Jim Rogers? Marc Faber? Really? Don't confuse greed with intelligence.
"You think they are "smarter" than Jim Rickards? Jim Rogers? Marc Faber? Really? "
Unfortunately, I must answer "Yes".
GG: The global economy is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.Chopper Ben: What do you mean, "biblical"? Tyler Durden: What he means is Old Testament, Benny, real wrath of God type stuff.
Marla: Exactly. Tyler Durden: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling! Marla: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes... Mish: The dead rising from the grave! GG: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria! Chopper Ben: You better buy physical gold then, I'll have Timmy fix you up round the back ... not!
Another excellent article GG.
GLD paper gold:
Excerpt from recent FOFOA post:
The problem is very simple indeed. This week alone the U.S. Treasury is borrowing 1 1/2 times the entire annual global production of Gold. And how much have they borrowed the week before that and the week before that...? The math is impossible and the lifeboat far too small to accommodate anyone even 1 second too late! What could "never happen" 2 or 3 years ago has already happened and then some. Now we wait for sovereigns, U.S. states and cities, even the U.S. Treasury to default...........or hyperinflate.
Beware believing the illusion:
The control grid includes the media, banking, education system, cross corporate initiatives (CFR), and the entertainment industry. These often promote propaganda/specific agendas meant to mold public opinion and make them receptive to change and provide direction from a handful of powerful individuals. Fear and greed, the carrot and the stick are used to motivate human behavior.
Santa Claus is a good figment of the imagination for children, while grown "adults" are afraid of people living in Aristotles cave in the middle east convinced that they are trying to kill us because they "hate our freedom". Kissinger stated, "Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."
As honest money leaves the system (going into physical as trust in paper logically falters due to irresponsible monetary and fiscal policies) they will change the system to be based on reduced consumption using the false global warming argument and CO2 tracking/carbon credits which is just another tool to control the masses (requires transaction information on all your activities - of course so that we can "save the world").
All the information will be on an implantable microchip, they will continue to plan events (PRS) to justify moving to this system. National health care fits into this agenda, property rights on your own body. Likewise, global H1N1, global warming, and a global financial system (IFM calling for one currency and IBS global oversight power grab) are all "global" problems created to justify a centrally controlled solution, operative word control. Tyranny can take any apparent form of governance regardless of what it is called dictatorship, republic, communism, socailism, fascism as long as power is centralized.
Don't listen to individuals telling you how you should think, feel, or respond but trust your gut (not your fear or greed, ask your head a question and your heart a question). GG's statement that the market is a distraction of moving numbers resonates, it looks like the biggest money laundering scheme ever created. What is imagination and what is real? Those things that require multiple senses to experience are real (physical). Rothschild recently stated he was in gold bars and secure (military) government bonds, and I think he knows a thing or two about real wealth.
Where we are and why implosion is possible:
Take a look at this shocking chart, it would appear this metric has led GDP:
http://link.businessinsider.com/view/bir.5gb/480303dc
http://dshort.com/charts/bears/four-bears-large.gif
http://dshort.com/charts/guest/gold-fibonacci-100311.gif
The most valuable commodity of all
"This thing all things devours: Birds, beasts, trees, flowers; Gnaws iron, bites steel; Grinds hard stones to meal; Slays king, ruins town, And beats high mountain down,"The answer is time, I'm sure Warren Buffett would trade it all to be 20 again. You and your time are more valuable than gold, you can never get one minute of your life back. The richest man in the graveyard (gold or other asset) can't take it with him. How is this relevant to the discussion about gold? Because dear friend, you have traded your labor (time) in exchange for something. The reason people value gold is because they value their time and personal property, and they want to have a sense of control regardless of irresponsible political policies.
It is disrespectful to not honor the contributions of laborers by reducing the value of what they agreed to exchange their labor for ($). That is a violation of the political contract between the government and the people. This is how a republic falls, through high taxes and inflation - it reduces production because of natural behavioral motivation.
Research on happiness shows that marginal increases in happiness are small for increasing incomes over $50k ($50k is enough to make most people "happy"). Enjoy your life, protect what you traded your time for, and focus on real things. On death beds, people rarely talk about their wealth, they talk about their experiences and the people they love. Carlos Slim, now the world's wealthiest man, stated in some ways wealth is a burden and that the more wealth you have, the more you worry about it losing value and what to invest in.
Balance is necessary and obsessing over gold or any other inanimate object, and guarding a gold stash with weapons is a waste of time. Focus on needs including food and shelter. At the same time, leaving wealth in a form that can be easily stolen legally through legaleze contracts and questionable investments is a recipe for disaster and dishonors your parents or their memory, your siblings, your children, and yourself. Your time is meaningful, there is nothing more meaningful.
In short, gold is freedom and debt notes are slavery.
+100
AN, thank you.
Your comment was as good as GGs' post.
I'd be very keen to read more of your thoughts, and those of a few other regulars here.
Exonomic Halfbreed has some very interesting thoughts added, way, way further down the comments.
We need to start GETTING REAL, in every sense.
WHO YA GONNA CALL - GOLD BUSTERS!
The dead rising from the grave........interesting proposition....my years of fake zombie killing have not been entirely wasted.......my shelves of double aught and .45 acp will come in handy.