- advertisements -
"Market Surveillance Department"
Orwell would struggle to come up with a more authoritarian sounding name
MARKET GUARDIAN ANGELS
Hugo Chavez was already here.
Sounds like price controls...
First limit quantity, Then limit price.
"Why do you need to buy that much cotton?" "What are you going to do with that much gold / silver? you can't possibly USE it for anything, so we're going to cancel your contract."
Let em', they do that, and PM's WILL really skyrocket, one way or the other black market.
What happens when anyone had done similar controls before?.
They really are trying to stop the tide.
They should try constructing levees out of all the cash they're printing.
Closed within the channel
can we get a comment ben. oh, you have nothing to do with this - ok
did u see egypt
The Messiah sees no evil and hears no evil.
ES margin requirements were hiked in Sep/Oct 2008 if I recall correctly.
If specs temporarily liquidate commods and put those profits to work in unloved gold and silver, watch out. Margin hikes will surely come but the specs are mostly gone at this point so the effect will be minimal... For now.
Sell de kottin mon!
Let me guess....JPM will get an exemption.
yes, and if u got an obamacare waiver, it comes with a cotton exemption
What?, no more free tampoooons?
ES? ...sure who feckin needs it?
This is Riganomics.
hilarious exchange between CEO of NEM who just offered cash for FRG and the clowns on fast money who are short.
Perfect....now we can have limit up days in other commodities.
CME cotton close off .049 on the close
Establish a position limit of 0 for all longs and just be done with it
sorry but can anyone explain what's wrong with position limits, especially in soft comos ?
I believe it's the timing of these position limits that's questionable. Why now? One answer is because the prices are rising due to inflationary monetary policy and that's not acceptable for the Central Bankers as one of their goals is stable prices. Establishing position limits instantly throws cold water on the price and produces the low/stable prices CBs love to see. Had the limits been in place all along no one would object. To put it crudely: Policy = Good, Volatile Policy = Bad
The other reason generally proffered for suspiciously timed margin hikes and position limits is that the House (i.e., ICE, CME, etc.) is protecting itself as the wager and pot size increase (sorry for the over use of gambling terminology but I think it fits well).
Ok I see your point and actually concur. Was under the impression that Tyler was somehow upset by the actual principle.
Supreme move in cotton position limits with the silver cftc investigation nearing 3 years now!! What a bunch of vampire squidding bastards all the live long day!! Sucking the ever livin life out of the host working class! rat bastards all!!
I dunno why these fuks are so obsessed with long specs ramping futures and having limits let em ramp em to the moon and let high prices cause producers to add capacity, hire workers and sell forward to the specs WTF is wrong with that?
In the case of food commodities, ramping = starvation.
Yeah, Free Market Capit=lism at its finest...
The Energizer Bunny?
Tyler I Love you and your Blog Zerohedge, but this is borderling worthless information. Who cares what the margin requirement are on anything. They could increase the margin requirments on all products to infinity, the truth of the matter is that its behind position limits. And when it comes to position limits, they only limit the amount of short contracts you can have. Never the longs. Never. What if you are a shirt producer in China, shouldn't you be able to buy all the cotton in the world to produce Justin Beeber Concert T-shirts?
The anwser is Yes you should be able to buy all the cotton in the world to produce Justin Beeber T-shirts, but its a horrible, terrible future expectation of society.
Cotton and rice are jumping on the cyclones in Australia, not because average Americans are getting squeezed on commodity prices. And not because people are there on both sides to create an equilibrium in that commidity's price.
Moreover, I doubt the average reader and blogger here coult tell me the difference between a cyclone and a hurricane without looking it up on Wikipedia.
Henry: I missed the part of the ICE statement above that mentioned this position limit was *only* on the short side. It states it's for positions "in excess" of 300 contracts. Sounds like a long-only position limit to me. Please clarify your statement.
Ohh Darn I made the Mistake of venturing into slightly responded into ville. Think long and Hard before you post here again. I have a question for you. What is the difference between h-1 and m-5. Thank you.
Mark this post !! ;-)
It will all be blamed on those evil speculators....
Nice pickup TD, when they raise the ES margins, look for a PM flight to safety!!
My understanding is that the limit applies only to the front month and then only up to the first notice (which is five days prior to the first business day of the month). So, you can still hold 5000 contracts in the front month, but you have to roll them before the first notice.
This is designed to avoid spqueezes and manipulations.
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.